The most critical problem of our Armed Forces in the NVO is communication
"Telegram" channel "Revenge of Goodwill" June 12:
That is, what honest experts have long warned about happened: the enemy suppressed by means of electronic warfare (EW) not only “civilian” means of communication, but also supposedly “unsuppressed” military networks with Azart radio stations. Particularly noteworthy is the cracking of encryption and blocking of radio stations even with 256-bit encryption.
At the same time, it is necessary to note the very careful and restrained use by the enemy of radio suppression means, which clearly indicates the analysis of our means and radio communication networks - both for their opening and listening, and massive suppression at the right time (both by the forces and means of electronic warfare of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and the United States, and NATO). In addition, due to the low secrecy of our communications (including the "latest" Azarts), the enemy, having good electronic intelligence (RER), in many cases prefers not to crush us with electronic warfare, but to knock out headquarters, equipment and personnel with fire strikes.
NWO: "Baofeng catastrophe"
The beginning of the SVO revealed for the whole society what they knew about, experts discussed in smoking rooms, but only a few “sounded the alarm” - a critical backward situation with communications in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. At the same time, “above” they simply did not perceive all the alarming signals and reports - on the one hand, “I didn’t want to be burdened with problems and bad things”, and on the other hand, we “seemed to” had good means of communication, respectively, “spots on the Sun do not interfere with it shine”, etc.
Massive and simply shameful for the second army of the world was the forced massive use of civilian analog radio stations of the Chinese company Baofeng, including sometimes in special units, which the enemy freely listened to and crushed (if necessary).
Partially, in a highly abbreviated form, this issue has already been considered in the article. “The oncoming tank battle on April 3 rigorously raises the issues of command and control, reconnaissance, and UAVs”.
It is obvious that the consequences of the massive use of open, eavesdropped by the enemy means of communication (which he could suppress at any moment) were extremely severe. At the same time, this situation continues to be preserved until now for a number of parts where open analog communication is still used.
The obvious reason for this is the absence or problems with normal full-fledged military army communications, which forces the use of even such primitive and extremely weak and dubious controls as analog “buffs”. At the same time, there is a certain logic in this - even such control is still better than a complete absence (especially with a thoughtful organization of communication and the use of a table of conditional signals).
However, a logical question arises - what about a full-fledged military connection?
Regular army secure communications: 168 complex "Aqueduct"
The key requirements for the tactical system of military communications are noise immunity, secrecy of communications and ensuring the control of the entire "military organism" of the appropriate level - which can only be implemented in the form of a complex of various means of communication. For the first time, this was implemented here (at a level corresponding to the requirements of the battle) in the R-168 Akveduk all-army communications complex, whose VHF radio stations had a pseudo-random operating frequency hopping (PRFC) mode at a speed of 100 jumps per second.
Of live journal signalman of the people's militia of the LPR Andrey Morozov ("Murz"):
Note: this was written even before the Hymers appeared on the front, however, even then there were those who asked questions (because many means of destruction (the same Tochki-U) were “gotten” there too).
We will return to the mass knocking out of our headquarters below ...
The current situation on the "Aqueduct" for "infantry" and towed artillery:
At the same time, it is necessary to understand that all (once again - all) armored vehicles (tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, self-propelled guns, armored personnel carriers), new and upgraded (and those that have not passed it - have old Soviet analog radio stations R-123 and R-173) had radio stations 168 of the complex , which is incompatible in a closed mode of operation with the new promising Azart radio stations (more details below).
It should be noted that since the beginning of 2010, the facilities of the Aqueduct complex were no longer considered by the leadership of the RF Armed Forces as modern, and one of the key complaints against it was the low speed of the PRFC. At the same time, the question is of interest, but what about the enemy:
That is, we have that the rate of frequency hopping of modern enemy radio communications (Harriz and Arselan radio stations): 100, 300, 1 (up to 000 hops per second) - i.e., those values that some communication specialists declared as supposedly outdated. This was largely due to the active advertising of the new Azart radio stations.
Full-time army secure communications: "Gambling" roulette
The key feature of Azart was the increase in the speed of the hops to the "almost fantastic value" of 20 jumps per second.
Hardware and software solutions for this (for all their extremely high cost) have become a key factor in the catastrophe in which the tactical communications of the Russian army find themselves today ...
At the same time, such formally significant advantages of Azart as a large frequency range, the implementation of a software-defined radio system (SDR) and the possibility of implementing a MESH topology (a distributed radio network in which each station can become a network repeater) turned out to be implemented with certain technical flaws.
Advertising plans for Azart were grandiose:
Comment by Andrey Morozov (Murz):
What happened?
Note: the data transfer rate declared in the "advertisement" could not be realized (crossed out) and the double strikethrough of the UAV - the author, since such UAVs were literally in a single copy and were not used in any massive way (except for frank "ersatz" such as a quadrocopter with taped to it with an ordinary radio station "Azart").
Andrey Morozov (Murz):
That is, the system ... which is actually adopted by our army, really has no analogues in the world, it is unique. This is a monstrous dummy that is devoid of a base, devoid of a powerful network of repeaters and HF stations, devoid of radio stations integrated into tank intercoms.
Repeaters
Andrey Morozov (Murz):
In summary:
This is for stationary placement.
What about offensive or active defense? Let's just say that it is difficult to find censorship words to describe this.
Actually, this is one of the key reasons for the "Kharkov-Izyum disaster" in the fall of 2022 - the almost complete loss of command and control - which only due to gross errors of the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine did not lead to large encirclements of our units, but cost very large losses in equipment (left to the enemy) ...
An attempt to break this vicious circle (about the probable reasons for the failure to equip the army with “big Azarts” and repeaters below) was the closure of the “local networks” R-187P1 to satellite communication channels. Below is one of their examples (for those who are especially vigilant - a diagram from the magazine of the VA General Staff "Military Thought").
On the right is one of the ersatz options for increasing the communication range (retransmission) by raising the repeater to a height on a kite (participant A. Morozov).
For some time it worked ... But then it led to an overload of satellite communication channels (despite the fact that the speed of our satellites significantly "leaves much to be desired").
At the same time, it is necessary to understand that a communications repeater is a very noticeable radio-emitting object, the position of which the enemy can quickly determine with high accuracy (this includes questions about “tethered quadrocopters”, etc.), and knocking out ground-based repeaters collapses the entire communication system.
A separate and very underestimated problem for us is the visibility of ground-based satellite communication stations to the means of electronic intelligence of the “so-called partners” (with all the ensuing consequences of direct transmission of intelligence information to the Ukrainian side).
Here it is necessary to emphasize the extreme importance for our army of such UAVs as heavy copters and VTOLs, precisely as carriers of special loads (including extremely important repeaters) over their territory! Moreover, with a height of application that excludes their defeat by fragments from the ground. Alas, the small number of such UAVs that appear, the command very often tries to "throw into cavalry attacks" on the enemy - with the task of optical reconnaissance or as bombers (where they quickly die due to their size).
Relationship with armor
As mentioned above, all armored vehicles (tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, self-propelled guns, armored personnel carriers), new and upgraded, had radio stations of the 168 complex ... incompatible in closed mode with the new promising Azart radio stations. Only in the open, respectively, all negotiations with the "armor" are perfectly and far listened to by the enemy.
With all this, “Azart” is an SDR radio, and it would seem to be “elementary” to “flash” into it the mode of closed (with frequency hopping) compatibility with the means of the 168 complex ... But it has not really been done so far (for ten years )!
It should be noted here that the reaction to a number of the author’s speeches on this topic by the “Azart mafia” was extremely painful, with statements that the author allegedly “does not understand anything and is mistaken”, including the alleged presence of “ interoperability for frequency hopping” “Azart” and 168 VHF radio stations. Actually, the answer to this (and evidence of deceit) from the Azart documentation:
Note that the need for compatibility 168 and Azart has been talked about for a long time. It is very likely that it has already been solved in one of the latest "firmware" of "Azart" ... Only now the army did not see this (for example, the testimony of Andrei Morozov). Open hatches in the video from the NVO zone with the hand of the tank commander (BMP) sticking out of it with "Azart" - for the same reason (in the absence of a direct closed connection, infantry "Azarts" were given to tank commanders).
I will express my personal opinion (value judgment) on this situation: such a conscious sabotage (this is the correct wording) of a critically important issue on the scale of the entire Armed Forces was due to the fact that specialists (including the "Azart" ones) understood their "fantastic PPRCH ” in 20 jumps not only has no real advantages over 000 jumps of the Aqueduct, but in fact turns out to be worse than it. That is, the introduction of compatibility between Azart and Aqueduct HRPs led to a direct comparison of these two HRPs (with devastating conclusions regarding Azart), and therefore people who “creatively mastered huge budget funds” had to drag it out and disrupt.
As a result, Andrey Morozov (Murz):
Digitalization of communication in a volunteer way
In the conditions of an extremely difficult state with the means of communication of the units of the People's Militia of the LPR and DPR, volunteer organizations (such as OBPS and KCPN - the Coordination Center for Assistance to Novorossia) rendered great assistance in creating a relatively modern communication system.
Yes, you need to understand that it was civilian radio stations (in the vast majority) that were supplied (without special military requirements), but they provided the opportunity (due to repeaters and MESH topology) to form communication networks of units and formations and secrecy of communication from listening.
- tried to give the troops immediately repeaters and base stations;
– tried to provide all portable radios with spare batteries as soon as possible;
- as soon as a volunteer resource for this appeared, they launched work on a module for installing standard base radio stations in armored vehicles to work with tank intercoms;
- each batch was supplied not even at 20, but at 10-15 stations with programming cords.
The last one is worth a closer look:
The question of individuals and organizations claiming (of course, only for advertising purposes) nonsense that noise immunity is “determined by encryption” (or “the presence of a local oscillator and 8 watts of power”) requires a separate article in a good way (and in all the nuances of the meaning of this words).
Here and now, it must be emphasized that DMR civilian radio stations (including expensive and sophisticated samples of Motorolla civilian radio stations), even in military service, continue to be non-military radio stations - in the sense of special requirements for them (their absence), and first of all, noise immunity. Nevertheless, there is no alternative to their massive use in the army today - accordingly, a set of special measures is needed to ensure their use in the face of full-scale opposition from the enemy (albeit with reduced efficiency).
EW problem
Speaking of electronic warfare, it is necessary to understand both its capabilities (for reconnaissance and suppression) and its limitations. For example, the possibility of fire destruction of powerful jamming transmitters that are clearly visible to the REM equipment. In addition, there are physical limitations due to both the terrain and simply the physics of radio wave propagation.
And despite the formally civilian origin, the inclusion of electronic warfare by the enemy does not mean guaranteed suppression of DMR networks - this requires the appropriate interference power in the radio station's operating band. In addition, for an extended communication network, noise immunity is a complex parameter determined not only by the characteristics of individual radio stations, but also by the organization of the communication network itself.
The author believes that communication specialists should carefully look at the choice of the optimal frequency range for such means as UHF or VHF, precisely at the EW angle. But this requires the implementation of special tests and research exercises (because much depends on the organization of communication and interaction), the conduct of which is urgently and critically necessary, and even yesterday.
Now it is worth emphasizing that the safety claims for electronic warfare "1-2 watts" of power have no basis.
At the same time, the enemy not only quickly studies our DMR networks, but also actively deals with the issues of opening encryption in them and the possibility of blocking individual radio stations.
Some of the trophy of his internal documents "(far from new, more than 5 years old) - screenshots from the documentation of the electronic intelligence station (RER) "Plastun".
Note: the Arakhis radio station indicated in the documentation is the very first production model (long outdated) of a tactical radio station with a frequency hopping frequency of our law enforcement agencies, which was issued from storage, including to the corps of the NM LDNR.
In discussions on the subject, electronic warfare experts repeatedly expressed to the author:
Yes this is true! For example, for a long time, a rather weak commercial HackRF analyzer was used for analysis (the characteristics of which were initially not enough for full-fledged "military work"). But this is only formal. For the strength of "Plastun" is in its mass character - its total saturation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near the LBS (line of contact), and since 2017 it has an interferometer for accurate target finding.
In our country, the “correct developers” design the “correct electronic warfare systems”, which eventually turn into “golden” at the cost of “elephants” (extremely expensive large-sized complexes), and they simply “cannot be” deployed near the LBS, because “there immediately are killed." As a result, the situation in the EW LBS managed to be reversed largely due to private initiative and volunteers. But all this is the subject of a separate article.
Now it is very important to emphasize that communications issues cannot be considered outside the EW factor, and moreover, it is the enemy’s EW capabilities that are one of the key determining factors in the organization of communications and its technical saturation.
This is very important, but often underestimated by signalmen. Again, from the author's recent discussions:
- Well, where and when did the Ukrainians suppress our connection? I am ... and such cases are unknown to me!
At the same time, this signalman from the NWO zone does not even think that if the enemy, having the full opportunity to at least “significantly limit” our communication capabilities, does not do this, then the very fact of this is a serious reason to “carefully look around and think.” For example, is he sitting in our networks himself? And doesn’t he copy not just a communication system, but with an exact link to specific command posts and units for the “H” hour?
Note: to the specifics of electronic warfare in relation to "Azart" - below.
Separately for Wagner
Andrey Morozov (Murz):
The use of commercial radios (even Motorola with 256-bit AES encryption) as military communications is an obvious weakness of the Wagner, and why the enemy did not take advantage of it is a question that really deserves attention.
Nabat on communication and "Azartu"
The question arises: publicly, furiously and for many years only Andrey Morozov sounded the alarm (yes, the head of the Coordination Center for Assistance to Novorossia Alexander Lyubimov - see, for example, the well-known report according to the standing buildings of the NM LDNR 2019), but what about the communications specialists? Were they all silent? Most, unfortunately, yes (and here is once again confirmation that the Specialist (with a capital letter) is not only technical knowledge and experience, but also moral principles, and the latter is also extremely important.
However, there were also those who sounded the alarm.
The first example: the exhibition "INTERPOLITEX-2018", the article "The Cry of the Soul" by the director of the STC "YURION" Yuri Sofyannikov.
At the same time, after a public reference to this article in a number of speeches and publications of the author
its source on the IA website "Weapon Russia" was removed (original link), but remained in cache.
First, about the critical problem of Azart:
About the attitude to PRFC and noise immunity (see above - the enemy did not rush at all for the speed of the jumps). According to civilian radio stations in the war against the enemy with modern electronic warfare equipment:
And a hard and objective conclusion:
Note: it is precisely the capabilities of the US and NATO EW that are implied, the capabilities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are not so much lower as they are deliberately limited by their puppeteers. However, these restrictions can suddenly and en masse be lifted…
Second example from the website of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation (direct link to pdf file).
Military Order of Zhukov University of Radio Electronics, materials of the II All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference "Problems and Main Directions in the Development of Radio Electronics and the Educational Process of Training Specialists in Radio Engineering Systems for Special Purposes" November 7-8, 2019. From the article by M. Yu. Mamon “Directions for the development of communication lines with pseudo-random tuning of the operating frequency”:
And most importantly:
And now, after which, in relation to the corresponding “specialists” (in quotation marks), the question arises “is this stupidity or treason”?
I repeat:
What is behind this sabotage?
Once again, Yu. V. Safnyanikov:
And just “lethal” (essentially about sabotage):
A logical question arises - what about the responsible persons - military commanders and "specialists" (in quotation marks), who "still have to learn this", "do not press shoulder straps"? Are the chairs on fire? Due to their obvious incompetence (or conscious intent). And how did these gentlemen defend their dissertations and what are they like military "scientists" (in quotation marks), if they do not understand elementary questions on electronic warfare?
Only now they (the majority) understand this perfectly, and this is precisely the answer that the verdict on the real "noise immunity" of "Azart" is now brought to us by the enemy (and far from being the strongest), and not the experience of tests and training grounds. This is the real answer to a very strange delay in the supply of Azart-N and Azart-BV to the troops ...
"Shot Headquarters"
Andrey Morozov (Murz) writes, speaking about the joint use of the RF Armed Forces Azarts and analog Beofengs:
It was specifically about the video, the screen from the short one is given below - a meeting at the front of the father-commander (with "Azart" and "Beofeng") and son (with "Beofeng").
Actually, a similar situation (but with Azarts and commercial analog/digital Hayters) can also be seen in the autumn series of photos with Colonel General A.P. Lapin:
С Site manufacturer:
DMR, GPS. This digital walkie-talkie with a full-featured keyboard offers a wide range of features and innovative features with exceptional quality for reliable and secure communications. The UL913 rating makes it the preferred choice for factories, oil and gas applications and other environments.
They forgot to write - and the RF Armed Forces.
However, back to Azart.
The facts of mass destruction of our headquarters by the enemy are known. The details that surfaced in the media make one doubt whether there was any serious investigation into the reasons for this, because there were many violations. However, it is not a matter of neglecting camouflage measures in general, but specifically, taking into account the degree of importance of individual factors. And here we come to the factor of "Azartov" clusters (with their extremely specific nature of radiation - "extremely low rate of change of the center frequency of data packets with many sync pulses") in the areas of deployment of headquarters and active use of satellite communication channels. Given the capabilities of satellite DER, our respective controls are like "flies on glass".
Alas, the fact that the nature of the radiation of such important objects should not stand out against the general background of the radio-electronic situation is known and understood only by a few specialists and bosses.
A typical example - with the massive use of Baofengs, it was Azarts that flew in the first place - because the enemy was well aware that they were not with “ordinary mobiles”, but with command or “special forces”.
Broken trough of the Main Directorate of Communications
Andrey Morozov (Murz) writes:
That is, the “responsible signalmen” of the Ministry of Defense have been strenuously all these years (after 2014) shoving into service radio stations that had critical export components!
Let me explain: the real dependence of our electronics (including military ones) on the imported electronic component base (ECB) is very high, however, competent developers and responsible bosses put into products and complexes that ECB that could actually be obtained on the Western commercial market, even in tougher sanctions.
However, there was a whole string of “talented masters of budget funds” nearby, who did not just lay down the “strictly sanctioned” ECB, moreover, even disrupted work on sanctions, because this allowed them to safely write off any of their expenses, in the absence of results, hiding behind these sanctions. Actually, today the result is that any mass production of "Azartov" has now become impossible. Suddenly, it suddenly became clear that the opponent (even a weak opponent) of "Azarty" was crushing ...
As a result, thunder struck in the industry:
A new team of managers is now “strongly taking validol” there ...
In this regard, it is appropriate to recall a photograph from the "Army-2021", with the presentation to the command of the RF Armed Forces by the leadership of "Angstrem" (now dismissed) of their products.
“And tomorrow there was a war” ... And such familiar faces of the generals from the reports of the NMD (on the right - the city of Shamarin, unfamiliar to the public, and about him below).
In fact, the mass purchase of civilian radio stations for the RF Armed Forces in China was a recognition of the catastrophe with the technical policy of the RF Armed Forces in terms of tactical communications.
Writes Andrey Morozov ("Murz"), February 16:
Untrainable [censored].
20 May:
- Spare batteries have not yet been seen in any delivery of portable Kerosene stoves to the troops.
- Base stations, not repeaters, namely base stations for communication nodes, were not noticed at all ...
- Walkie-talkies for installation in equipment with integration into TPU are not provided (despite the fact that the Armed Forces of Ukraine successfully and massively began to do this back in 2015), there are an insignificant number of repeaters ...
That is, despite the year of hostilities and heavy losses, the responsible officials demonstrated not only a complete disregard for the experience of others and combat experience, but also an absolute lack of training ... Or is it a conscious intent?
That is, when the enemy in a brigade captures a radio station in battle, for example, a platoon leader - EVERYTHING, the whole brigade must collect all the stations, take them for flashing and distribute them again ... The fact that when the platoon leader station is captured, control in the battalion-brigade link should not be disturbed regiment, and the battalion must change their stations in one evening with their own lace - opening for these amazing people.
Are all channels in the radio programmed with the same key? Fine! So be it!
And here the question arises: is everything that happened really stupidity or self-interest? Or is it still a conscious intent to undermine the combat capability of the RF Armed Forces? Are there too many coincidences? And has anyone raised the question exactly in this plane? No? And why?
The country must know its heroes
And one more logical question: given all of the above (and the severity of the ensuing consequences), who is responsible for all this? Who are the responsible persons? Here they are.
Official statement from the Ministry of Defense:
I emphasize - not only means of communication, but also automation of control (for which huge funds were mastered, but in fact for the NWO we turned out to be practically naked with the automated control system). We will return to the issue and problems of automated control systems below and in a separate article.
• organization, control of the state and provision in the Armed Forces of stable functioning of communications and automated control systems (ACS) of the Armed Forces;
• organization and control in the Armed Forces of technical support for communications, automated control systems and computer networks;
• organization of construction and implementation of the unified automated communication system of the Armed Forces…
Accordingly, the Main Directorate of Communications (GUS) has chiefs responsible (at least declaratively and legally formally) for communications of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (and it is also necessary to emphasize the role and position of the deputy chief of the GUS for armaments).
Kommersant, 07.02.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX - “Counterintelligence took up the colonel general. Deputy Chief of the General Staff Khalil Arslanov arrested for fraud”:
This one (these) sits (sits). True, it is obvious that not for everything and not for the entire range of acute issues.
Let's move on and give the floor to Mr. Khalilov's successor. Head of the GUS of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Shamarin, an article in Krasnaya Zvezda (October 21.10.2022, XNUMX) “We act reliably, continuously, with Azart…”:
The R-187-P1 radio station has an extended operating frequency range, the ability to work with the radio stations of the old fleet ...
Once again, the chief signalman of the Armed Forces tells how everything is allegedly “good” with both communication and Azarty ... While at the front they run all the time next to civilian walkie-talkies (often analog ones in general), there are very serious questions according to the real noise immunity of Azarts (and in general the possibility of continuing their serial production), communication with the “armor” goes through open channels (and this is even for the latest technology!) ...
Having said about the “main responsible” officials - Arslanov and Shamarin, one cannot miss the deputy for weapons of the GUS Mr. Rubis (directly sitting on the topic):
“... at present, the most important is the automation of processes, we pay more attention to the automation of data transmission in order to greatly reduce the time for decision-making, command and control of troops, units, weapons ...”, - said Alexander Rubis ... even video communication in HD resolution is currently used ... with the help of high-resolution video recordings, it is possible to more accurately convey the situation, information, and various reference tables.
I emphasize that this technical nonsense, which speaks of a complete misunderstanding by this person of the topic of automated control systems, is not a fake, not enemy voices. This resource the Ministry of Defense itself.
And “transmission through HD video” of “situation, data and reference tables” - from a person directly responsible for the development of ACS (and not multimedia, photo and video reports) - is not only a complete failure in ACS (which, in fact, we we have), but also just the basics of organizing command and control and communications - which, in general, is decisive for the creation of a military communications system.
What to do?
There is a good rule - "criticize - offer!", However, it is not entirely and not always true.
At first, responsible persons who received huge funding, who had all the resources for the proper solution of the task, are obliged to personally answer (and answer) for the result.
Secondly, the situation where the responsible officials have brought us is not only shameful, but also extremely difficult, in fact, as a result of their actions, today the Armed Forces do not have a modern reliable stable command and control system (primarily at the tactical level).
Thirdly, there are solutions, both technical (alas, but in an emergency it will be an inevitable suit of patches - there are no ready-made solutions - which is a direct consequence of the "Gambling Scam"), and organizational (and here the same supplies by volunteer organizations played a very large positive role ), but today, given the ongoing hostilities, with proposals for the future in a public format, one must be extremely stingy and prudent.
Fourthly, and most importantly.
The key factor now is real noise immunity, and here real tests, research exercises are urgently needed (for a start, checking all available means of communication (and networks with them) with high-quality radio control equipment).
And here it is necessary to clearly understand that the requirements for noise immunity for our military radio equipment should objectively be higher than for Western ones - due to the significant superiority of Western electronic warfare (and the bar for requirements for it should not be set by the fact that overseas masters allowed the Armed Forces to use against us yesterday , namely, the real capabilities of the US and NATO electronic warfare).
Information