Special operation experience: Tor-M2 air defense system on a real battlefield

63
Special operation experience: Tor-M2 air defense system on a real battlefield
SAM "Tor-M2" in position


In the zone of the Special Operation, the Russian army has deployed and maintains a developed layered air defense system. One of its main components involved in the military air defense are anti-aircraft missile systems of the Tor family. They are constantly on duty, detect and hit various air targets, including the most complex ones - small ones. Drones or high precision weapon.



SAM in combat


The units and formations of the Russian unit involved in the Special Operation have their own military air defense, built using various types of air defense systems. Thus, the Tor-M2 and Tor-M2U complexes are involved in the divisional and brigade level. They are designed to intercept air targets in the near zone and complement the more long-range air defense systems of the type of products of the Buk family.

Our air defense systems collide with air targets of various types. The enemy is trying to use tactical Aviation and aviation weapons, both Soviet-style and foreign. Unmanned aerial systems are widely used, from small commercial products to full-size reconnaissance and strike systems. Also, unguided and corrected rocket artillery munitions pose a threat, incl. foreign production.


"Tor-M2U" on the march

The crews of the Thors are on duty and cope with the tasks assigned to them. The exact indicators of the effectiveness of their combat work have not yet been disclosed, but almost every day the Ministry of Defense reports the successful defeat of various air targets. Various UAVs, TSAs and rockets are being hit and destroyed.

It should be noted that the effective combat operation of the Tor-M2 (U) air defense system contributed to the overall change in the situation in the air. For example, Russian air defense has inflicted critical damage on Ukrainian aviation, which is why planes and helicopters appear less and less in the sky, and the risks associated with them are reduced. In turn, UAVs and rockets are still quite frequent targets, mainly due to the presence of foreign supplies.

Obviously, the combat use of the Tor family air defense systems will continue, and the military air defense will retain an effective short-range weapon. Together with other complexes with longer-range missiles, they will protect troops and settlements from enemy air attack weapons. It is very likely that the effective work of the Thors will again force the enemy to reconsider tactics - due to the loss of one or another equipment.


Technical features


The 9K330 Tor anti-aircraft missile system has been developed since the mid-seventies in the interests of the air defense of the ground forces. The basic modification of the air defense system was adopted in 1986. Subsequently, it was repeatedly modernized, and new modifications were put into service. The last generation of complexes appeared in the troops in the tenth years - these were the Tor-M2 and Tor-M2U products.

In the course of consistent development, the "Tors" retained the overall architecture and principles of work. At the same time, certain components were replaced, new weapons were introduced, etc. Thanks to this, modern "Tory-M2 (U)" have serious advantages over the original 9M330 air defense system.

The main element of the modern Thor complex is the 9A331M2 combat vehicle. It is built on a unified cross-country tracked chassis. SAM can accompany troops on the march or on the battlefield; unification simplifies operation. A combat module-tower with all the necessary equipment and weapons is mounted on the chassis. Part of the equipment is located inside the building, at the places of calculation, including three people.


Older complex "Tor-M1", participating in the Special Operation

A target detection station (SOC) is installed on the tower module. This is a phased array radar designed to monitor the air situation within a radius of at least 30 km. SOC detects targets, with the help of an interrogator, checks their nationality and takes them for automatic tracking. Automation also determines the potential danger of targets and helps the operator of the complex to calculate the order of attack of targets.

For shelling targets, a guidance station (SN) and an optical-electronic sight are used. They provide accurate tracking of an air object before launching a missile, and also track the launched missile and provide its guidance. The radio command guidance method is used with the transmission of commands via CH. There are four target channels. Provides work on targets with EPR from 0,05 sq.m.

For later modifications of the Torah, the 9M338K anti-aircraft guided missile was developed. Due to the refinement of the rocket, its transport and launch container and the launcher in the tower, it was possible to double the ammunition load - up to 16 units. Rocket less than 2,9 m long and weighing approx. 163 kg develops speed up to 1000 m/s. Destruction range - 12 km, height - 10 km. The missile carries a high-explosive fragmentation warhead weighing approx. 15 kg.


Calculation "Tora-M2U" at work

The 9A331M2 combat vehicle can operate independently, fully performing all tasks, or as part of an anti-aircraft unit. In this case, the vehicles are assembled into firing batteries of three; four batteries make up one division. When deploying combat vehicles at a distance from each other, a battery or division can provide cover for a large area. In addition, the increased ammunition load allows the unit to cope even with a massive raid.

Realized potential


Thus, the latest Torah upgrades have resulted in the emergence of modern air defense systems with high performance characteristics capable of hitting all expected air targets. At the same time, the development process of the complex does not stop and is carried out taking into account new experience, as a result of which all the main capabilities are improved. Not so long ago it became known about the study of the next modernization.

A decisive contribution to improving the combat characteristics of the Tor-M2 (U) air defense system is made by the development of the radar and computer complex. The latest models of detection and guidance stations are characterized by increased parameters and are able to detect and track even complex targets with low visibility - UAVs made of plastic / composite, rockets, etc.


Air monitoring with ECO

In the course of combat work, the SOC determines the coordinates of the target and issues target designation to the SN. The latter also takes the target for escort, and also guides the missile. If necessary, the guidance station is assisted by the ECO. Interaction of stations, data processing, etc. provided by a powerful on-board computer.

In the course of recent upgrades, the characteristics of a standard missile defense system have not fundamentally changed. However, new radar and computing tools make it possible to more fully use the potential of the 9M338 product. Due to this, the rocket turns out to be a more accurate and effective weapon.

Of great importance is the ability to work as part of a multi-component air defense system. In this case, individual air defense systems are networked and can exchange data, receive target designation from third-party means, etc. Due to this, the overall area of ​​responsibility of the unit increases, and the risk of detecting a position by the enemy with subsequent negative consequences is also reduced.


The mobile version also has a positive effect on the safety of the air defense system. Torahs of all modifications can track the situation on the move and track targets. In recent upgrades, it also became possible to fire on the move with a confident hit on the target. In addition, having discovered itself by radar radiation and missile launch, the complex can quickly leave the position and not fall under enemy attack.

Proven in practice


Since February 2022, the Tor family air defense systems and other domestic air defense systems, both military and facility, have been tested by practice. They are used in the zone of the Special Operation and work with real air targets. The enemy uses a wide range of means of air attack, and countering a number of such threats is assigned precisely to Tor-M2 (U) products.

Over the past time of Special Operations, modern versions of the Thor have clearly shown their ability to detect and hit all current threats, from aircraft and UAVs to missiles of various types. At the same time, the enemy uses foreign assistance, and we can expect the appearance of new types of air targets. It is obvious that the Russian army and industry are already taking the necessary measures - and the Torahs will be ready for any challenges. Moreover, the air defense as a whole will have to show the same results.
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    2 June 2023 03: 36
    So it asks for the modernization of Tor1 to Tor2, if possible.
    1. +17
      2 June 2023 16: 31
      The text is about nothing... There is no new information, no analytics. wasted time
      1. +3
        8 June 2023 16: 17
        Wasted my time. Nothing - the detachment did not notice the loss of a fighter, and even when the cat has nothing to do, he licks eggs!
  2. -6
    2 June 2023 04: 06
    I wonder how realistic it is to put on Tor radar and electronics from Pantsir-SM? In terms of mass and dimensions, they should become, and according to the software, so to speak, can they be associated with Thor missiles?
    1. +9
      2 June 2023 04: 48
      Quote: JD1979
      I wonder how realistic it is to put on Tor radar and electronics from Pantsir-SM?

      Question from the place: what's the point? Was there an excess of REO for the Shell?
      1. -10
        2 June 2023 05: 00
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        Question from the place: what's the point?

        At a minimum - an additional target detection and illumination station
        1. +10
          2 June 2023 05: 16
          Quote from Bingo
          At a minimum - an additional target detection and illumination station

          In terms of?! Isn't his own Toru enough?!
          1. -6
            2 June 2023 06: 34
            In the sense spaced - tenacious. And in general, when both the Shell and Tor can work out for the target, it multiplies both the survivability of air defense, and response, and layering.
            1. +5
              2 June 2023 06: 43
              Quote from Bingo
              And in general, when both the Shell and Tor can work out for the target, it multiplies both the survivability of air defense, and response, and layering.

              The comment is not about collaboration, but about installing Tor REO from Pantsir ...
              Quote: JD1979
              I wonder how realistic it is to put on Tor radar and electronics from Pantsir-SM? In terms of mass and dimensions, they should become, and according to the software, so to speak, can they be associated with Thor missiles?
        2. +5
          2 June 2023 12: 08
          Quote from Bingo
          At a minimum - an additional target detection and illumination station

          And why "pantsirevsky" missiles with RKTU additional target illumination station? In general, why missiles with RKTU backlight goals? wink

          And the complexes (with a working surveillance radar) themselves must issue information about the air situation to the air defense system. True, they will not live in this mode for long: a surveillance radar operating on the air attracts a PRR, like a luminous lantern - butterflies. smile

          I'm not talking about the fact that the "Pantsir" is the air defense of the VKS, and the "Tor" is the military air defense.
          1. 0
            3 June 2023 12: 22
            Rather, the Shell is the air defense of the "last frontier" (although it does not like rain), while the Thor is the air defense of the protection of a moving object (devoid of weapons of the super-near zone).
            Completely capable of complementing each other, but by no means replace.
            1. 0
              20 August 2023 07: 58
              The shell is good at knocking down targets flying at him, and Thor knocks down all targets in his radius of action, that's what their main difference is. The shell directly covers the object on which it stands. Therefore, Thor is more expensive than the Shell.
          2. 0
            5 June 2023 22: 54
            Quote: Alexey RA
            And the complexes (with a working surveillance radar) themselves must issue information about the air situation to the air defense system. True, they will not live in this mode for long: a surveillance radar operating on the air attracts a PRR, like a luminous lantern - butterflies.

            You can turn off the radar when approaching the PRR. Or you can hit the PRR with missiles. For Buk up to M1 inclusive and any Wasp, this is difficult, but starting from the S-300 family, Buk-M2, Tor, PRR is a regular target.
            1. -1
              6 June 2023 16: 53
              If they COULD turn off the radar on time, then there would be no PRR in principle.
              The whole trouble is just that the enemy releases, for example, Harm, and the complex, even seeing it, does not understand that it is Harm and that work is already underway on it.
              And in those extremely rare cases when he manages to understand, then time remains only to answer.
              Shell or Thor is not a light bulb, it is not so easy to turn it off.
              And the last - well, ok, turned it off, managed it, so what? The PRR will still fly to where it was aiming. And 99% there will be a complex, even with the radar turned off.
              1. +1
                6 June 2023 21: 48
                Quote: Denis812
                If they COULD turn off the radar on time, then there would be no PRR in principle.

                If it were not for the radar to be turned off on time, then there would be no radar in principle.
                Quote: Denis812
                The whole trouble is just that the enemy releases, for example, Harm, and the complex, even seeing it, does not understand that it is Harm and that work is already underway on it.

                And what is there incomprehensible? High speed target with low RCS.
                Quote: Denis812
                And in those extremely rare cases when he manages to understand, then time remains only to answer.

                The reaction time of modern air defense systems is no more than 10-15 s. And what can be incomprehensible with a high-speed target with a low RCS?
                Quote: Denis812
                Shell or Thor is not a light bulb, it is not so easy to turn it off.

                Bulb. Even the transmitters of the old target illumination radars switched from antenna to dummy antenna and back again with one "click", like light bulbs.
                Quote: Denis812
                And the last - well, ok, turned it off, managed it, so what? The PRR will still fly to where it was aiming. And 99% there will be a complex, even with the radar turned off.

                Yes, nothing like that! PRR guidance to a ground-based radar is radar guidance under conditions of multipath propagation of radiation. PRR guidance is carried out with an error that grows with increasing distance to the radar. The sooner you turn it off, the larger the RRP miss will be. If the radar is not turned off, then with a probability of 0.8 the final miss of the PRR will be no more than 10-20 m. By the way, the PRR practically does not hit meter-long radars.
                Z.Y. HARM for the Shell and Thor is a regular target, in which there is nothing supernatural.
                1. 0
                  20 August 2023 08: 02
                  The PRR guidance, in addition to radiation, also has an INS, so when the radar is turned off, it is guided according to the established location using the INS.
    2. +6
      2 June 2023 08: 24
      Quote: JD1979
      I wonder how realistic it is to put on Tor radar and electronics from Pantsir-SM? In terms of mass and dimensions, they should become, and according to the software, so to speak, can they be associated with Thor missiles?

      What freon? belay What nonsense? stop
      1. -2
        2 June 2023 16: 33
        Well, the freon is obvious - in the armed forces there are two complexes with very similar characteristics, but at the same time they are completely different in design, components, ammunition, spare parts, etc. And if the differences are justified in terms of the running base, then the question is whether we are fattening ?
        1. 0
          3 June 2023 12: 27
          They have close dimensions and range, but completely different capabilities. Yes, their characteristics partially overlap (especially if you get hung up on the range numbers, forgetting about the rest) - but just as Thor is unable to "finish off" a small-sized kamikaze drone that has broken through the missile strike zone, so the Shell, in turn, will not help the one stretched out in the rain column.
          1. +1
            3 June 2023 19: 41
            Well, I don't agree. Let's leave the MZA alone, especially since there were questions about the Shell's guns. In fact, we have two (including Tunguska - three) anti-aircraft missiles of similar dimensions, performance characteristics and cost, and people's money is used to improve each. If the Shell could not work in the rain - why was it needed? Okay, "Tunguska", a military complex, but does the Pantsir work in the air defense of the Aerospace Forces - do KR and UAVs not fly in the rain? True, the adherents of the Shell write that the new options are dual-band and can work in the rain (at least sea ones). Moreover, they threaten to make a medium-range air defense system out of the Shell - if it is initially somewhat, um, limited in its capabilities - is this money down the drain? The fact that the two complexes complement each other is wonderful, but from a financial point of view, it is somewhat ruinous. Is it possible to somehow bring to mind one thing for the future?
            P.S. According to Thor, I was always surprised - why does he need a rotating tower? The missile launches vertically, it doesn't care which way the target is. Wasn't it easier to lift the missile guidance radar upstairs?
            1. 0
              4 June 2023 23: 54
              Well, why the tower rotates is just clear. The guidance station is fixed on the turret and rotates with the turret.
              1. -1
                9 June 2023 20: 04
                The guidance station is fixed on the turret and rotates with the turret.
                This is an engineering solution "on the forehead" and raises questions. Probably something more elegant could have been done.
                1. 0
                  7 December 2023 01: 02
                  For missiles that were originally placed on the Torus (which were in flat containers), the declination was essentially provided by the launcher (the missile necessarily fell in a certain direction). At that stage of development of chemistry for solid fuel engines, this was a justified decision.
                  The new generation was made with minimal changes to the proven “chassis” design
            2. +1
              5 June 2023 22: 45
              Quote: Sergey Sfyedu
              If the Shell could not work in the rain - why was it needed?

              Funny thing. For more than a year now, the fighting in Ukraine, where the Shell has been successfully operating in different weather conditions, including in the rain, but they still continue to write that "The Shell could not work in the rain."
              Quote: Sergey Sfyedu
              True, adherents of the Shell write that the new options are dual-band

              Guidance of missiles in the Shell is carried out by a mm-range radar.
              Quote: Sergey Sfyedu
              Moreover, they threaten to make a medium-range air defense system out of the Shell - if it is initially somewhat, um, limited in its capabilities - is this money down the drain?

              It is nonsense. Due to the use of missiles with increased energy in Pantsir-SM (S1M) and a guidance radar with a greater energy potential, it became possible to hit targets at a greater range. The increase in range is a consequence of the use of a new missile defense system and radar. The purpose of using the new SAM is to reduce the firing cycle of the SAM. In the SM (S1M), the range of hitting targets with a low EPR has also increased due to an increase in the energy potential of the SAM guidance radar. And due to the lack of a target sensor in the new missile defense system, there is practically no restriction on the minimum height of the target to be hit.
              1. 0
                9 June 2023 20: 12
                Wonderful. Which in no way cancels the presence in production, in the troops and in R&D of two completely different air defense systems with similar capabilities. Talk about the fact that these two systems complement each other is a so-so argument. In reality, either one or the other will work on a specific object, and almost never - both together. The dispute - which is better - "Thor" or "Shell" has been going on since their appearance, and apparently will not end while both of these systems are in service.
                1. 0
                  7 December 2023 01: 04
                  Three. The shell has 3 radars and 2 types of missiles. Of the 6 possible combinations, three are released.
                  And we haven’t even gotten to Thor yet...
    3. 0
      3 June 2023 12: 18
      Really. And it will even reduce the price of TOR.
      True, at the same time it will multiply half of its capabilities by zero.
    4. 0
      14 August 2023 16: 39
      And why, TOR is more efficient and cheaper than the Shell.
  3. +10
    2 June 2023 04: 54
    it’s hard for me to see from the sofa, but I got the impression that there are the least questions and complaints about the air defense component and the results of their work ..
    1. +14
      2 June 2023 06: 26
      There are claims to air defense, in fact, only one .... they are NOT ENOUGH, for such a large theater of operations. But this is not even a question for the military, but for those who "were not prepared for this"!
      1. -1
        3 June 2023 12: 31
        These are claims not to the air defense component, but to the organization of their work.
        However, the frankly low saturation of our air defense forces has been noted since the time of the Second World War, and, which was noted by foreign experts of those years (especially naval ones) with sincere surprise, the situation did not improve, not only during the war, but much later.
        1. +1
          5 June 2023 22: 28
          Quote: ailcat
          However, the frankly low saturation of our air defense forces has been noted since the time of the Second World War, and, which was noted by foreign experts of those years (especially naval ones) with sincere surprise, the situation did not improve, not only during the war, but much later.

          Does anyone in the world have a better saturation of the air defense forces?
        2. +4
          10 June 2023 13: 13
          Our country is already very large, you won’t get enough air defense
  4. +5
    2 June 2023 06: 20
    In turn, UAVs and rockets are still quite frequent targets, mainly due to the presence of foreign supplies.
    . This is exactly the "genie" that was released from the bottle and poses a threat, he can / will be EVERYTHING !!! Cheap and cheerful, which will not be said about the ways to deal with it, alas.
  5. -2
    2 June 2023 06: 34
    Quote: rocket757
    This is exactly the "genie" that was released from the bottle and poses a threat, he can / will be EVERYTHING !!! Cheap and angry

    So no one in the Defense Ministry seriously considered the danger from UAVs and Hymarsa-type missiles.
    The current conflict is a good opportunity to study the weapons of the future.
  6. +9
    2 June 2023 07: 34
    The Tor air defense system proved to be good and I think that it is worth learning from the Syabry experience and sending such a version of the Tor to the NVO zone in order to be able to quickly transfer additional complexes to the threatened direction
    1. 0
      2 June 2023 11: 48
      I saw an article yesterday, the "dome" showed models of tori at the exhibition, and there was a KAMAZ 8x8 base good
      1. -1
        3 June 2023 15: 29
        I didn’t see it on Kamaz, but I drove a car on a trawl.
    2. +5
      2 June 2023 12: 15
      Quote: svp67
      The Tor air defense system proved to be good and I think that it is worth learning from the Syabry experience and sending such a version of the Tor to the NVO zone in order to be able to quickly transfer additional complexes to the threatened direction

      And why scratch your right ear with your left foot and order through Belarus domestic universal Tor-M2KM modules (manufactured by IEMZ Kupol OJSC) for installation on any wheeled chassis of suitable load capacity and dimensions? wink

      Maybe it's better to order directly - at Almaz-Antey, since they also have their own chassis from BAZ?
      1. +3
        2 June 2023 15: 14
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Maybe it's better to order directly - at Almaz-Antey, since they also have their own chassis from BAZ?

        All our inertia and inertia, it is high time to have a wheeled version of the "TOR" and send them to be equipped in reserve air defense regiments, along with the "Shells"
        1. +6
          2 June 2023 16: 33
          Quote: svp67
          All our inertia and inertia, it is high time to have a wheeled version of the "TOR" and send them to be equipped in reserve air defense regiments, along with the "Shells"

          What's with the stiffness here? "Tor" is a military air defense complex that covers the battle formations of troops and columns on the march. In his TTT, the speed and patency were registered as in MBT and BMP. Accordingly, the chassis was made caterpillar - otherwise something like MAZ-543 would be required (ABM "Tora", i.e. all equipment and launchers, weighs 15-20 tons).

          Separate reserve air defense regiments are the air defense of the VKS. She doesn’t have “Thors” at all, and the “Shells” close the niche of the MD air defense system.
  7. +4
    2 June 2023 08: 11
    Destruction range - 12 km, height - 10 km
    TTX Zur 9M338K: range = 16 km; reach in height = 10 km ....
  8. +16
    2 June 2023 09: 14
    I thought there would be an article, as they say in the first person, about real operating conditions with all the pluses and minuses, but here again the agitation poster pours from empty to empty. He looked at the author and "And I recognize the sweetheart by his gait ..."
    1. +3
      3 June 2023 03: 55
      Quote: Alex 1970
      I thought there would be an article, as they say in the first person, about real operating conditions with all the pluses and minuses, but here again the agitation poster pours from empty to empty. He looked at the author and "And I recognize the sweetheart by his gait ..."

      Unfortunately, the VO editors do not heed the numerous requests from readers to indicate the author next to the title.
    2. -2
      5 June 2023 22: 25
      Quote: Alexey 1970
      I thought there would be an article, as they say in the first person, about real operating conditions with all the pros and cons, ...

      And why is it for you?
      1. The comment was deleted.
    3. -1
      8 June 2023 16: 02
      So forward as a volunteer to ... that's where you will get fucked in the first person or to ... a torn egg!
  9. +2
    2 June 2023 11: 46
    I just assembled such a model here 1/35 ☺️
  10. 0
    2 June 2023 12: 17
    If the TOPs of old modifications, which are in service with the Armed Forces of Ukraine, greatly interfere with the work of our Aerospace Forces, then what are its latest modifications?
    1. +1
      3 June 2023 06: 48
      All Soviet-made Torahs inherited by Ukraine are now not operational. No.
  11. -1
    2 June 2023 23: 11
    I like TOR with its futuristic design. And he seems to have some kind of caterpillar base (?).
  12. +4
    2 June 2023 23: 39
    The tor is a good air defense system, but to deal with small and cheap UAVs, it needs simpler and smaller missiles. Spending a three-meter rocket of 163 kg on a small drone is wasteful. It’s a pity to spend even small rockets on a new shell. For these purposes, it is more expedient to use 30 mm shell guns, Tunguska or 57 mm derivation guns with remote detonation of shells. By the way, for some reason, the use of tunguskas is completely invisible in the NWO. Written off and cut into metal or what? As well as Dots -U. Now they would come in very handy. But with us, as always, everything is done at the wrong time.
    1. -2
      3 June 2023 12: 38
      To fight drones, spending missiles is a waste in any case. Because even the most primitive missile (say, from Pantsir or MANPADS) will cost ten times more than any "flying moped" ... Nuance: the means of destruction is expensive, not the target to be protected. So the situation "the end justifies the means" can very well happen.
      But you are certainly right that a cannon can be more useful for hunting drones. But a cannon has an effective range of no more than a couple of kilometers, and it will simply be impossible to cover an entire column with it on the march! Which, in fact, divided the niches of TORs (columns of armored vehicles or rear units) and Pantsirs (compact accommodation facilities, primarily mobile ones)
    2. +1
      8 June 2023 16: 13
      You immediately feel a professional of a wide profile who shot and cut from everything without sliding off the sofa - you can see the eagle in flight and the chicken in the litter !!!
  13. 0
    3 June 2023 17: 50
    I just watched a video where Ukrainians destroy our air defense systems, including TORs, with kamikaze drones. Moreover, on one video, TOR shoots a missile at a drone and misses, as a result, the drone hits the air defense system.
    Rapid-firing cannons would be nice. Or at least in a bunch of "Shilka", so that it works in pairs and is guided in such cases automatically by a kamikaze drone.
    1. -1
      3 June 2023 19: 16
      let's post a link to the video .. otherwise you're a hollow.
  14. +1
    3 June 2023 21: 05
    .typical talker .. pulled out technical parameters from somewhere .. from somewhere else other journalism. I don't understand.. what drives people to post this nonsense..
  15. 0
    4 June 2023 18: 17
    It would be interesting to compare the combat effectiveness of Thors with Shells, the feasibility of producing almost identical systems
  16. 0
    5 June 2023 22: 23
    For later modifications of the Torah, the 9M338K anti-aircraft guided missile was developed. ... Range of defeat - 12 km, height - 10 km.

    Destruction range - 16 km, height - 12 km, heading parameter - 9.5 km.
  17. 0
    10 June 2023 08: 25
    On the next upgraded version of the Tor air defense system, perhaps it will be M3, it is necessary to introduce a radar with AFAR, this will improve performance in terms of detecting more targets at the same time, at even greater distances and with smaller dimensions, and the missiles need to increase the range of hitting targets even more for a couple of miles.
    1. 0
      11 June 2023 00: 07
      Quote: sgrabik
      On the next upgraded version of the Tor air defense system, perhaps it will be M3, it is necessary to introduce a radar with AFAR

      Where to implement? There are two radar detectors on the "Thor".
  18. -1
    28 August 2023 16: 57
    As I understand it, we read all these TTAs because in the course of goodwill these cars have already been seized by the Ukrainians, I guessed?
  19. 0
    23 September 2023 07: 53
    To work in tandem with the TOP, you need a tracked artillery system with shells with remote detonation (as an option in 57 mm caliber).
    In modern combat conditions, this pair will be ideal.
    1. 0
      23 September 2023 08: 40
      Again, the artillery system, within the boundaries of its responsibility, will be able to intercept not only enemy UAVs but also anti-tank missiles.