Nuclear "Ding-Dong". kilotons of American air defense

22
In the late 1940s and early 1950s, the US military knew that the USSR had a nuclear weapon and there is a means of delivery in the form of a copy of the American bomber Boeing B-29 Superfortress - Tu-4. The issue of air defense of the United States itself has become more acute than ever. The bombers were getting bigger and faster, their defensive armament was getting stronger, while the machine guns and even the cannons of the interceptors were becoming less and less effective. Guided missile weapons, in fact, were just in their infancy. In addition, not a single air defense system could guarantee 100% interception of all bombers, and even one aircraft with an atomic charge that broke through could do things.

Nuclear "Ding-Dong". kilotons of American air defense

The heroine of our publication is a rocket - Douglas MB-1 (in an early configuration and with an early designation). Yes, it's a rocket, not a bomb...

Under such conditions, the option of solving the problem of "knocking out with a wedge" seemed quite logical. An unguided rocket with a nuclear charge was developed. The United States already had extensive experience in creating and using unmanaged aviation missiles, including large caliber ones. Such a rocket was powerful and at the same time reliable. And the presence of a nuclear warhead removed the issue of the lack of guidance systems.




A Convair F-106 Delta Dart pilot looks at a Douglas AIR-2 Genie rocket. F-106 at some point became the main and last carrier of this missile.

Development began in 1955. In 1956, tests of the rocket itself without a warhead began. It was supposed to install a W25 nuclear warhead with a capacity of one and a half kilotons on the rocket. As planned, an explosion of such a charge in the air was guaranteed to destroy any aircraft within a radius of 300 meters from the epicenter of the explosion.

The Thiokol SR49B solid-fuel engine made it possible to achieve a maximum range of 6 miles (approximately 9,7 km) at a speed of Mach 3,3. In 1957, the rocket was put into service under the designation MB-1, which was later changed to AIR-2A, the code name for the entire period of operation remained - "Genie" (Genie).


A shot from a US Air Force training film showing the installation of a combat charge on an AIR-2A missile.

In the same 1957, the rocket began to enter service. The first carriers were 15 Northrop F-89 Scorpion interceptors based at Hamilton Air Force Base near San Francisco. The very next year, 286 F-89s became carriers of the Genie. Over time, the carriers of the AIR-2 were McDonnell F-101 Voodoo and Convair F-106 Delta Dart.


The photo captures the moment of a single launch of a Douglas AIR-2 combat missile by a Northrop F-89 Scorpion interceptor during the Operation Plumbbob nuclear test.

Rocket production continued until 1963. A total of 3 missiles were fired. After 150, only inert training ammunition was produced in small batches. US Air Force technicians dubbed the missile "Ding Dong" (Ding Dong) for a certain similarity of late-series missiles with one of the male primary sexual characteristics.


The most beautiful photo of the launch of the Douglas AIR-2 Genie inert missile by the Convair F-106 Delta Dart interceptor.

The new weapon also required specific tactics for its use. If there were no particular problems with the launch and detonation of the warhead: the rocket became cocked at launch (thanks to overload sensors), the detonation occurred at the set range when the sustainer engine stopped working, then leaving the affected area was just that dangerous maneuver, which took the most time to complete.


A picture from a US Air Force training manual showing one of the Douglas AIR-2 missile attack options, and most importantly, the way out of the attack.

There were no cases of combat use of such a unique weapon, but once a nuclear warhead of an anti-aircraft missile was detonated over a test site in Nevada. This happened during Operation Plumbbob, a series of nuclear tests that took place in Nevada from May to October 1957.


Fireball from the explosion of the Douglas MB-1 rocket warhead, produced on July 19, 1957, taken from the runway 30 kilometers from the explosion site. In the foreground is the carrier of a nuclear missile - Northrop F-89 Scorpion.

The tests (the explosion of the Douglas MB-1 rocket, codenamed "John", John) were intended not only to test new weapons, but also to reassure the American public. Information appeared in the press that the sky over the United States is now reliably protected by the latest nuclear weapons that have entered service with the US Air Force. News had a side effect - people began to worry about the consequences of detonating a nuclear charge in the sky over the US mainland.


Close-up shot of a fireball from a Douglas MB-1 missile warhead explosion on July 19, 1957.

In order to dispel the fears of ordinary Americans, right under the site of the explosion of a nuclear charge (the explosion occurred at an altitude of about 6 thousand meters), five Air Force officers (three majors, a lieutenant colonel and a colonel) and a photographer were supposed to be at the time of detonation. In order for the public to be absolutely calm, all those present under the epicenter of the explosion were without hats - an unheard-of vulgarity and a violation of the charter by the standards of the second half of the 1950s.


US Air Force officers look at a fireball above their heads on July 19, 1957.

Of all the participants in this performance, Major John Hughes was the second to die first, however, this happened 33 years after the tests, in 1990. The rest died even later in the second half of the 1990s, in the 2000s and even in the 2010s. So the Americans really worried in vain. Although no one knows what would happen in the event of the mass use of these or similar ammunition over populated areas, we will not know for the benefit.


The same Northrop F-89 Scorpion model J that launched an air-to-air nuclear missile, installed as a monument near Great Falls Airport in Montana.

But the US was not the only country to exploit American nuclear weapons. This was also Canada.

You ask - how is it not a nuclear state, which is armed with a nuclear weapon, and even adopted in service in another state?

Yes, everything is simple, NATO has operated and is operating a program under which a country with nuclear weapons provides nuclear weapons for use in the event of hostilities to a country without its own nuclear arsenal. The so-called "double keying" mechanism.

The British also worked on the issue of using the Douglas AIR-2 rocket, but they could not (did not want to) make significant changes to its potential carrier, the English Electric Lightning.


A Douglas AIR-2 rocket next to its Canadian carrier, a McDonnell F-101 Voodoo model B.

The career of the nuclear air-to-air missile ended with the decommissioning of its last two carriers. In the US Air Force it was the Convair F-106 Delta Dart, in the Royal Canadian Air Force it was the McDonnell F-101 Voodoo. This happened already in the second half of 1980.

Surprisingly, such an archaic and primitive weapon in many respects lasted in service for so long. Air-to-air guided missiles had long been in service, semi-active radar homing was the norm in missile-aircraft, and the American arsenal still had a nuclear club to kill sparrows. The principles of "nothing will be superfluous" and "all means are good" played their role.

Only when it became clear that the old weapons system would have to be modified separately for new machines, it was decided to abandon the nuclear anachronism.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    3 June 2023 04: 02
    The author is not original. No. There were much more detailed and interesting articles on this topic on the Military Review. As for nuclear warheads, in the late 60s and early 70s, there were about 70% of them on American air defense systems.
    1. +6
      3 June 2023 06: 44
      Quote: zyablik.olga
      The author is not original. No. There were much more detailed and interesting articles on this topic on the Military Review. As for nuclear warheads, in the late 60s and early 70s, there were about 70% of them on American air defense systems.

      You probably mean the wonderful Bongo cycle about North American air defense?
      1. +4
        3 June 2023 14: 25
        Got to the point. I also remember that excellent and detailed cycle. Especially the section about Nike and others like them "strategic air defense systems".
        From SW. hi
  2. +4
    3 June 2023 05: 05
    In the 50s, "From a great mind and little knowledge" from the consequences of the use of nuclear weapons in many countries, exotic projects for the use of these weapons were developed.
    The USSR did not escape this either, in which, under the leadership of V. Chelomey, the "Taran" system was developed, based on the use of Chelomeev's UR-100 missiles with nuclear warheads of 10 megatons as anti-missiles (no enemy warheads are needed, their own will be enough for a complete * (end)) . Fortunately, these works have been stopped. Details at https://topwar.ru/90930-proekt-sistemy-protivoraketnoy-oborony-taran.html
  3. +6
    3 June 2023 05: 08
    Well, the Soviet Union developed anti-missiles with nuclear weapons.
    My father got leukemia at the training ground in Semipalatinsk, having arrived
    for testing a warhead product from the city of Priozersk (Sary-Shagan). The wind is not
    turned there. He died of a heart attack at 52.
  4. +7
    3 June 2023 05: 26
    Only when it became clear that the old weapons system would have to be modified separately for new machines, it was decided to abandon the nuclear anachronism.

    One got the impression that Mr. Supreme "priest" doomed Russia not only to abandon the history of the Soviet period, deleting and masking (retouching) elements that are still visible and having a physical embodiment, but also from the existing nuclear weapons ...
    This chivalry is manifested too clearly in relation to countries (and the regimes ruling them) that openly set the goal of destroying Russia and the entire Russian world.
    * * *
    It was nuclear weapons that were developed so that it would not occur to ANYONE to destroy Russians (Russians) so easily.
  5. +1
    3 June 2023 06: 19
    for a certain similarity of late series missiles with one of the male primary sexual characteristics.

    Secondary. Primary - the presence of testes / ovaries, but everything else is secondary.
    Involuntarily you will think - is censorship really necessary? I would just write - x ..., and there would be no mistake, no, they come up with rules, and then they don’t get out of the puddle with these rules ...
    1. +3
      3 June 2023 06: 40
      Yes, censorship is really needed - from people like you who do not know that the organ with which the American nuclear baton was similar refers specifically to primary sexual characteristics.
      The primary sexual characteristics include the gonads and accessory organs of the reproductive system. In male mammals, for example, these are the testes, vas deferens, prostate gland, penis, in females - the ovaries, oviducts, uterus, vagina.


      Yarygin's biology textbook, part one, chapter 6.1.2. The role of hereditary and environmental factors in determining the sex of an organism

      Under the primary sexual characteristics understand the morphophysiological features of the body, ensuring the formation of germ cells - gametes, convergence and connection of them in the process of fertilization. These are the external and internal organs of reproduction.


      "Sit down - two!"
      1. -4
        3 June 2023 07: 45
        Quote: Alt22
        "Sit down - two!"

        Go order one coffee. If they have changed it now, this is an indicator of the degradation of the Russian Academy of Sciences - and nothing more. Medically and biologically - only the presence of the gonads allows you to refer to a specific sex, for example, there is a diagnosis of "true hermaphrodite" - and only on the basis of the presence of the glands is made, exclusively! and whether or not there is an MPX - to the button, this is secondary.
        1. +1
          3 June 2023 08: 01
          "If they changed it now, this is an indicator of the degradation of the Russian Academy of Sciences"
          - this is your indicator of degradation, since you have confused the external and internal genital organs with secondary and primary sexual characteristics.
          And, I find it funny when one of the couch experts dares to argue not even with just one academician - but with the whole Russian Academy of Sciences. You, in any way, are the beacon of all times and peoples, an unrecognized genius, since you consider yourself smarter than the authors of all Russian biology textbooks? wink
          1. 0
            31 July 2023 08: 59
            , since you consider yourself smarter than the authors of all Russian biology textbooks? wink

            You know, I'm walking down the street and I immediately see: here is a male, here is a female. As that without research of primary sexual. I'm genius?
  6. +2
    3 June 2023 07: 12
    Development began in 1955. In 1956, tests of the rocket itself without a warhead began. It was supposed to install a W25 nuclear warhead with a capacity of one and a half kilotons on the rocket. As planned, an explosion of such a charge in the air was guaranteed to destroy any aircraft within a radius of 300 meters from the epicenter of the explosion.


    So how many bombers will be within a radius of 300 metro then ... 1 or 2 ... they are big themselves and do not fly close to each other
    Well, taking into account that she is not controllable ... and they will let her in ... approximately there ...
    1. 0
      4 June 2023 13: 16
      So how many bombers will be within a radius of 300 metro then ... 1 or 2 ... they are big themselves and do not fly close to each other

      So the S-75 warhead was also created for group purposes ...
      And she did the job perfectly!
      Almost TWO centners of warheads! There is something to surprise!
  7. +4
    3 June 2023 07: 38
    The nuclear air-to-air missile career ended... in the second half of 1980.
    Each time has its own principles and technical means of protection. But it turns out that in the United States this, as the author put it, "anachronism" really lasted too long. According to the principle - the place will not lie, but suddenly come in handy.
    1. 0
      4 June 2023 13: 19
      So how many bombers will be within a radius of 300 metro then ... 1 or 2 ... they are big themselves and do not fly close to each other

      Anti-aircraft missiles work on ships and other radio-contrast targets ... And if such an air-to-air missile and on a ground or ship ... ???????
      1. 0
        4 November 2023 23: 21
        In general, yes. It is simply an unguided missile guided by the entire aircraft before launch. It would work even better against ground targets or, for example, a bridge.
  8. +2
    3 June 2023 07: 41
    Those were the times! (c) Why didn’t they invent! And of all, only nuclear power remained, and nuclear charges, and even then as an initiator for thermonuclear. Yes, we are with a nuclear tug ... but even then there is no news again - they made some noise and forgot
  9. +2
    3 June 2023 17: 52
    Quote from Sith
    So how many bombers will be within a 300 metro radius then ... 1 or 2 ..

    But you don't need to vaporize the bomber! 1500 tons of TNT is not a joke. And there are a lot of them. Cheap and cheerful. And no interference is terrible. hi
    1. Alf
      +3
      3 June 2023 19: 29
      Quote: fa2998
      But you don't need to vaporize the bomber!

      What for ? Here, EMP is enough to turn off EVERYTHING on the plane ... And a modern plane plans no better than a brick.
  10. +3
    4 June 2023 11: 39
    The Soviet S-75 air defense system had a special product in the ammunition load. I saw it with my own eyes during the years of military service in the Air Defense Forces of the Country (1970-1972). During the year, they built a storage facility on their own and in 1972 received several products there, of which three were stored assembled on the TZM in readiness for refueling. The performance characteristics of the rank and file were not brought up.
  11. +1
    4 June 2023 18: 57
    We could use a nuclear warhead on the S200, it seems the radius of destruction is 900 meters.
  12. 0
    7 June 2023 15: 43
    Quote: ROSS 42
    One got the impression that Mr. Supreme "priest" doomed Russia not only to abandon the history of the Soviet period, deleting and masking (retouching) elements that are still visible and having a physical embodiment, but also from the existing nuclear weapons ...

    That's right.
    And the Priest's phrase about the fact that only galoshes could be made in the USSR confirms the hatred for the history of our Motherland.