"Beavers" against "Shells". Technical aspects of the Ukrainian attack

55
"Beavers" against "Shells". Technical aspects of the Ukrainian attack
The flight of a Ukrainian UAV over a village near Moscow. Photo Telegram / Dambiev


On the morning of May 30, the Kiev regime tried to attack Moscow using several unmanned aerial vehicles. The recently developed Drones strike purpose with a built-in warhead. Despite the novelty, they did not cope with the tasks. The devices were shot down or suppressed, as a result of which the damage from the attack was minimal.



Course of events


An unsuccessful attempt to attack Moscow took place on the morning of 30 May. Several Ukrainian UAVs approached the capital from a western direction; probably they were sent to important objects in the city. However, the devices fell into the zone of action of air defense and electronic warfare, as a result of which they did not complete the task.

Soon the Ministry of Defense revealed the details of this situation. According to him, eight aircraft-type drones were involved in the raid. Five air targets were shot down by Pantsir-S anti-aircraft missile and gun systems over the Moscow region. Three more suppressed unnamed electronic warfare systems. These UAVs deviated from the assigned course.

Unfortunately, there has been some damage. The suppressed aircraft, having lost their original course, ended up over Moscow and crashed into three residential buildings. The impacts and explosions damaged the external elements of buildings, knocked out windows and damaged apartments. Two residents of the affected apartments asked for help due to minor injuries.


The work of ZRPK "Pantsir-S" on UAVs. Photo Telegram / Dambiev

Specialists from the Ministry of Defense and law enforcement agencies studied the scenes of the incidents. The wreckage of Ukrainian UAVs was collected for the necessary examinations. The Investigative Committee opened a case under the article "Terrorism" and establishes those involved in the attack. The Ministry of Defense, in turn, is studying the downed UAVs to further improve the forces and means of air defense.

Objective evidence


Already on the morning of May 30, shortly after the raid, videos began to appear on social networks showing the overflight of Ukrainian UAVs and the work of our air defense. In addition, later in the major media there were photographs of the wreckage of the downed devices or those that hit the houses. All this allows us to determine the possible type of drones used and draw the following conclusions.

Most of the published videos show the flight of an aircraft-type UAV built according to the "duck" scheme. The fragments caught in the frame make it possible to estimate its size: the wingspan can be about 3-3,5 m. Apparently, it was precisely such devices that were used for the strike.


One of the damaged houses in Moscow. Photo Telegram / Dambiev

In hot pursuit, it was reported that the well-known UJ-22 Airborne unmanned aircraft was also used in the attack. As evidence, a video was cited with his flight somewhere over the Moscow Ring Road. However, this was a mistake - a Cessna 172 civilian aircraft, which had nothing to do with the whole situation, got into the frame.

Unmanned "Beaver"


Downed and suppressed Ukrainian UAVs were built according to the canard scheme, and their airframe was made of composite material. It seems that the Kiev regime has begun to use the Beaver-type attack drones developed and introduced in the recent past.

Judging by the available data, the development of the Beaver began last year. The main directorate of intelligence could act as the customer of this equipment. The performer of the work and the manufacturer of the finished UAVs are still unknown. It is reported that the development and production of such equipment was paid not only by the customer organization. 20 million hryvnias collected by volunteers were invested in the project.

In early May, one of the Ukrainian bloggers for the first time showed the finished product "Beaver" or its layout. It was alleged that only donations managed to build five such products. In addition, without any evidence, it was said about the beginning of the use of these UAVs and about the great damage that they allegedly already inflicted on the Russian army.


Blogger-donor and UAV "Beaver". Photo Focus.ua

However, all this was just baseless boasting. At the time of the first demonstration, nothing was known about the use of the Beaver. For the first time, such UAVs were noticed in the sky only at the end of May over Krasnodar - a few days before the events in Moscow. However, it can be expected that new drones will continue to be used, and our air defense will again have to repel attacks.

Recognizable appearance


Not too much is known about the Ukrainian UAV "Bober". Its appearance is shown and some design features are known. It is noteworthy that these details became known from the results of a recent unsuccessful application - they were able to establish them from the fragments found. At the same time, most of the performance characteristics have not yet been disclosed.

"Beaver" is built according to the "duck" scheme and has an elongated torpedo-shaped fuselage. In the nose of the glider placed horizontal tail of a small scale. The straight wing is shifted towards the tail. The length of the product can be estimated at 2-2,5 m, the wingspan is about 3-3,5 m. The take-off weight is unknown, but it is unlikely to exceed tens of kilograms. Takeoff is carried out using a three-point landing gear.

The UAV is equipped with an internal combustion engine located in the tail of the fuselage; propeller is used. The flight speed can be estimated at 150-200 km / h. The Ukrainian side claims that the range reaches 1000 km. Whether this is true is not yet clear - known attacks did not require a maximum radius.


Unoperated warhead type K3-6. Photo Telegram / Shot

The drone is equipped only with an autopilot that allows you to fly along a given route to a specified point. Navigation is carried out according to the signals of satellite systems. There are no means for detecting a target in the final leg of the flight. Probably, communication with the operator is also not provided.

"Beaver" has a built-in warhead and hits the target by direct fall on it. As a warhead, a standard Soviet-designed K3-6 engineering charge is used. An unexploded product of this type was found on one of the UAVs that got into a Moscow residential building. K3-6 is a portable shaped charge 240 mm long weighing less than 5 kg, of which 1,8 kg is explosive. Such a warhead is capable of penetrating at least 200-210 mm of armor or 500-550 mm of concrete.

Real results


Thus, the Ukrainian "Beaver" is another unmanned "aircraft projectile" designed to hit fixed targets with known coordinates. Its strengths include simplicity of design, the absence of complex and expensive components, as well as a high flight range. However, it has already become clear that such a UAV cannot fully realize its advantages in a real situation - the results of the May 30 raid showed its actual potential.

In theory, the widespread use of plastics/composites, the smooth lines of the airframe, and the correct flight profile should reduce the likelihood of detection and destruction. In practice, our Pantsir-S air defense missile systems were able to detect the Beavers and successfully attack them. Five of the eight flying UAVs were shot down.


Fragment of the UAV. Photo Telegram / Dambiev

Flying to a target using satellite navigation also has its limitations and problems. Our electronic warfare equipment suppressed the corresponding signals, due to which the enemy drones were unable to continue flying along a given route. Unfortunately, having strayed from their original trajectory, they ended up in residential buildings.

Damage to three houses shows the real level of power of such an attack drone. Two charges of K3-6 could only damage the external elements of buildings, break windows and injure several people, and the third did not work at all. What damage such charges could inflict on a protected military facility is a big question.

Task for defense


Thus, the Ukrainian attempt to attack Moscow failed. The drones were unable to reach important military or infrastructure facilities and hit residential areas, with minimal damage. All this shows that the Kiev regime is ready for any measures to counter Russia. At the same time, it does not have sufficient funds for a tangible or noticeable impact. As you can see, now great hopes are placed on the new Beaver UAV, but it does not justify them either - like a number of samples before it.

It should be taken into account that the recent attack on Moscow failed not only because of the imperfection of Ukrainian strike weapons. Our air defense and electronic warfare systems played a key role in this. They realized their advantages, and also used the shortcomings of enemy equipment and got the desired result. Obviously, air defense and electronic warfare will continue their work and prevent or stop the next such attacks.
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    1 June 2023 04: 29
    A somewhat optimistic article - this raid is only a test of the pen, reconnaissance, it will get worse further. There will be more UAVs, of different types and from different
    directions and I would not be so sure that the next attacks would also be repulsed with minimal damage. So far, no one has managed to build an ideal air defense.
    1. +12
      1 June 2023 05: 05
      Quote: Quiet Don
      So far, no one has managed to build an ideal air defense system.

      Tanks on enemy airfields, this is the ideal air defense, but its appearance and air defense contradict each other.
      1. 0
        1 August 2023 11: 01
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        Tanks on enemy airfields, that's the perfect air defense,

        First, it is necessary to knock out the manpower of the Ukrainian punishers and their means of fire destruction. Modern drones do this most successfully. Ukraine, represented by Zelensky and Avakov, will not abandon its war goal of exterminating the Russian language in Crimea and Donbas if it loses less than 1 million of its thugs killed.
    2. 0
      1 June 2023 05: 59
      Quote: Quiet Don
      So far, no one has managed to build an ideal air defense system.

      This is the factor we need to use. By the way, we use
    3. +5
      1 June 2023 07: 36
      Quote: Quiet Don
      A somewhat optimistic article - this raid is only a test of the pen, reconnaissance, it will get worse further. There will be more UAVs, of different types and from different
      directions and I would not be so sure that the next attacks would also be repulsed with minimal damage. So far, no one has managed to build an ideal air defense.

      If you pay attention - in general, all the speakers have now started the mantra “do not pay attention to the blow. The main thing is not that he was, but how they were able to recapture "...
  2. +7
    1 June 2023 05: 07
    One circumstance confuses me. If the shortest path was 1000 km, then it turns out they flew for about five hours. And not a single air defense point found them. I don’t believe it. And if they were aimed not at Moscow, but at the nearest villages? Something doesn't fit here. A gas tank flies into the apartment, and there are no consequences.
    1. +1
      1 June 2023 06: 04
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      Something here does not fit.

      There are versions that UAV elements and explosives were brought in advance through the Anglo-Saxon embassies in Russia, assembled and launched from territories adjacent to Moscow
      1. +8
        1 June 2023 06: 42
        Why through embassies? Why such difficulties? With our borders, this can be done much easier, the Crimean bridge will not let you lie.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +9
    1 June 2023 05: 21
    There are big doubts that the "Beavers" fly "low" and 1000 km. Rather, the work of the apparatuses assembled in the Moscow region and the “friendly activity” of the envoys from Zelensky manifested itself here ...
    In any case, the debriefing should be prompt and appropriate measures taken.
    The very fact of the frequent attacks on Moscow makes one wonder whether everything is fine in the Oblonskys' house...
    1. 0
      5 June 2023 22: 24
      Quote: ROSS 42
      There are big doubts that the "Beavers" fly "low" and at 1000 km.


      Light drones flying over such long distances actually carry a tailwind - with a wind of 60 km / h, in 8 hours of flight, an ordinary non-motorized glider-soaring glider will travel 480 km due to its action alone. The engine is needed simply to stay in the air and do without large elongation wings, and the wind itself can do the main work of moving in space. Given that they are much lighter than manned vehicles, their gliding and soaring properties should be better than those of light manned aircraft.
  4. +14
    1 June 2023 05: 29
    Did the attack on Moscow fail? The very fact that strikes on Moscow began in the 15th month of the NMD is already discrediting the Russian military-political leadership, for which everything is going "according to plan." The plan turns out to be very strange: to strike first, then show a "gesture of good will" and detachedly watch how the enemy turns the Belgorod region into Donbass and picks up the keys to strike at Moscow. By the way, attention was drawn to the fact that Ukrainian strikes on May 30 fell on areas adjacent to the control center of the Strategic Missile Forces. This, of course, is not a reason for the use of nuclear weapons - you never know what is written in the "Nuclear Doctrine of Russia"!
    1. 0
      1 June 2023 08: 46
      Quote: Boris Sergeev
      The plan turns out to be very strange: to strike first, then show a "gesture of good will" and detachedly watch how the enemy turns the Belgorod region into Donbass and picks up the keys to strike at Moscow.

      Mentally abnormal situation.
    2. +3
      1 June 2023 11: 01
      Did the attack on Moscow fail?
      IMHO: this is not an attack, in the language of the infantry - "reconnaissance in force" - "probing" missile defense systems (by the Anglo-Saxons).
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/А-135
      USSR missile defense covered Moscow, and US missile defense base Vandenberg. An adequate answer could only be "probing" the missile defense system of that base. In fantasy theory, in practice, the Chinese, with their stray balloons, showed that everything is possible (if with the mind, and not on the forehead).
  5. +6
    1 June 2023 05: 31
    Everything is somehow strange. Now Rust will land on Red Square, then a whole squadron has flown to Moscow. And where is the rest of the air defense? Or are we only guarding Moscow? The author is overly optimistic.
    1. +1
      1 June 2023 06: 10
      Quote from buv59
      Either Rust will land on Red Square, or a whole squadron flew to Moscow

      Do not specify how much time passed between these events?
      You can also complain: winked Either Genghis Khan and Mamai will look into Rus', then immediately Karl with Napoleon and Hitler, a disgrace ... do not let you fall asleep am
    2. -1
      1 June 2023 08: 40
      Quote from buv59
      And where is the rest of the air defense?

      In Moscow.
    3. +4
      1 June 2023 11: 19
      Now Rust will land on Red Square, then a whole squadron has flown to Moscow.
      After "Rust" - I just hung a piece of paper 10x10cm in the upper right corner of the radar screen, where it was written (remembered verbatim) in red letters: "Remember the operator! The incident with the West German aircraft must not happen again!" and... everything!
      And what about the operators - they saw and reported everything, but all decisions are made TOP. And there everything rotted long before that. Remember Damansky Island, where the decision was made by an ordinary lieutenant, and Moscow was silent for a week? If the Chinese had declared a note of protest, the flyer would have been nullified, but the note did not follow. After that, cleaning in those offices should have been done, there should be those who take responsibility, and do not evade it into the bushes. That's when Rust would not exist.
      1. +2
        1 June 2023 11: 38
        Yazov Dmitry Timofeevich was appointed to the post of Minister of Defense of the USSR by a decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of May 30, 1987, unexpectedly, 2 days after the flight of Matthias Rust and the subsequent resignation from the post of Minister of Defense Marshal of the Soviet Union Sergey Leonidovich Sokolov.
      2. +1
        1 June 2023 18: 15
        Remember Damansky Island, where the decision was made by an ordinary lieutenant, and Moscow was silent for a week?
        Of course we remember. The decision to use the Grad was by no means taken by the lieutenant, but by the deputy. commander of the DVO. The Chinese killed border guards who were not armed with this system. Then there was a big stink in the foreign press that since they used weapons that were not in service with the PV, it means that they themselves attacked the peaceful Chinese people.
        1. -1
          1 June 2023 19: 46
          History (the same Wikipedia) is rewritten 3 times a day by all and sundry. FULL NAME. I don't remember anymore. And the fact that they were silent for a week is a fact:
          1. 0
            1 June 2023 22: 11
            History (the same Wikipedia) is rewritten 3 times a day by all and sundry.
            And why did you dump this bullshit on me here? There is a book by Lieutenant General Babansky (in those battles he was a sergeant), where everything is described in detail.
            1. -1
              2 June 2023 01: 17
              This is not "bullshit", but decision speed - a week, i.e. 7 days.
              In 7 days, 7 "Mathiasov Rustov" can fly. In the future, this "speed of decision-making" by the center only fell, it took more than 7 years to make a decision on the Donbass (NVO). Well, where next? In modern warfare, 7 minutes is a lot, and sometimes even 7 seconds. Do you know how much 1 revolution of the radar antenna is 10 seconds (6 rpm), and how many targets can be given out for it (azimuth / range / identification)? You will learn in 1,5-2 seconds. one goal - then we will talk on the merits, and not discuss stripes.
              1. 0
                2 June 2023 08: 46
                This is not "bullshit", but the speed of decision-making - a week, that is, 7 days.

                There were two battles on Damansky - on March 2 and 15. I highly recommend reading this 2004 book in addition to the memoirs of the participants.
                Learn to read - then we will talk on the merits.
  6. +2
    1 June 2023 05: 36
    Practice shows that the best defense is an offensive: the destruction of the production of UAVs, attacks on command posts, launch pads and CPR.
    1. +3
      1 June 2023 06: 16
      Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
      Practice shows that the best defense is an offensive: the destruction of the production of UAVs, attacks on command posts, launch pads and CPR.

      Of course, only the offensive must be successful.
      And, for this, it is necessary to concentrate the necessary forces and means, work out coordination, interaction, logistics, communications, support services, military-civilian administrations and law enforcement officers in the liberated territories, means of ensuring social programs and payments ..., restoration of the destroyed ..., support medicine, work...
      And it's all about the budget...
      1. -1
        1 June 2023 22: 42
        And these territories should be considered liberated or captured? Many here believe that only enemies are on the outskirts. Burn to the ground and all for a short time. And you are talking about jobs, medicine. There are also some Nazis and Bandera, including babies. (For the especially gifted - sarcasm)
        1. 0
          1 August 2023 11: 10
          Quote: Essex62
          There are also some Nazis and Bandera, including babies.

          Now Ukrainians are more dangerous for Russia and the Russian people than Nazi Germany was in 1941-1945. The Germans did not seek to destroy Russian culture and the Russian language. They simply considered themselves more capable of governing the Russians and believed that the Russians would be happier under German rule. Ukrainians initially recognize the inferiority and backwardness of their culture and, on the basis of this, they are trying to completely destroy everything Russian. Lech Walesa generally announced plans to destroy 2/3 of the population of Russia, that is, all men and a significant part of women.
  7. +4
    1 June 2023 05: 52
    These UAVs have already been seen more than once in attacks on the Moscow region. Already fell in the area of ​​Kolomna and Noginsk. And no one beat them. They themselves fell. Or they extinguished "" by means of electronic warfare. They / Western curators / have long been working out optimal routes with a change in altitude, course, in order to bypass our electronic warfare and air defense in order to possibly deliver a serious blow to the rear.
    This is not the first and unfortunately not the last raid.
  8. -2
    1 June 2023 06: 04
    And what prevents us from using similar actions. Collect geraniums in the cellars of Kyiv and circle over the corteges of top officials and overseas advisers? You can also collect in the basement of London, draw a blue and yellow flag ... Mexicans and Colombians are generally pros in this matter, illegal drugs have been delivered across the border to mattress covers for a long time
    1. +2
      1 June 2023 06: 21
      Quote: Andrey1978
      And what prevents us from using similar actions. Collect geraniums in the cellars of Kyiv and circle over the corteges of top officials and overseas advisers? You can also collect in the basement of London, draw a blue and yellow flag ... Mexicans and Colombians are generally pros in this matter, illegal drugs have been delivered across the border to mattress covers for a long time

      If you think abstractly winked
      - not being afraid to make non-standard decisions, impudence, courage ... and the image of Naryshkin request
  9. 0
    1 June 2023 06: 33
    A very useful article... for Ukrainian specialists. They will study, take measures, eliminate shortcomings, make improvements ... Well, why so detailed? They would say - successfully shot down. It's enough. And, so, this is the work, as grandfather Lenin said - "useful idiots." Maybe I'm wrong, but I think that any hint to the enemy increases our problems in the not too distant future. And, for us, it is enough to be sure that these Ukrainian weapons of destruction will not fall on our heads. From the fact that we learn their technical details, it will only be easier for our enemies.
    1. 0
      1 June 2023 19: 07
      They made me laugh, but the enemy knows the situation better than you and me. The fact is that the district police officer of the Russian Federation was detained for cooperation with the SBU.
  10. +9
    1 June 2023 06: 34
    The author apparently took the hat-making factory by storm, now we’ll throw the whole of Ukraine
  11. 0
    1 June 2023 07: 13
    By the way, I will express a possibly naive thought. And why not remember the experience of World War II? Fight low-speed drones with low-cost, light-engine, possibly turbojet, aircraft. Air patrol of a certain analogue of the LA-5 or the Aircobra there, designed and manufactured using modern materials and technologies. Probably, their cost will not be too expensive than a sophisticated anti-aircraft missile and gun system. Are drones observed from the ground? Accordingly - VNOS posts. Mobile communication is working properly. Citizens are vigilant :). Radar facilities are available. Satellite intelligence exists. Of course, we need pilots, technicians, infrastructure, etc. But such are the challenges of the time.
    1. 0
      1 June 2023 09: 57
      Air patrol of Moscow? So there are other cities in our country - 4 planes for each?
      Let's say the plane found a drone - what's next? What to knock him down?
      I didn’t quite understand about vigilant citizens - call 02 and warn about a flying drone?
    2. +2
      1 June 2023 16: 19
      Excuse me! Has the Russian Federation already designed and put into production an aircraft that replaces the AN 2? And when will we develop and produce analogues of LA 5 and Aerocobra, which are still more difficult?
    3. 0
      1 June 2023 23: 10
      UAVs fly at an altitude of up to 200 meters. It is inconvenient to use aviation against them
  12. +5
    1 June 2023 07: 24
    Residents of Rublyovka can "throw off", the amount will be ridiculous according to their income, and buy themselves an electronic warfare brigade and a brigade of "shells")))
    1. +4
      1 June 2023 17: 15
      Quote: TermNachTER
      Residents of Rublyovka can "throw off", the amount will be ridiculous according to their income, and buy themselves an electronic warfare brigade and a brigade of "shells")))


      Taki already! But there were some difficulties. wassat laughing

      1. 0
        1 June 2023 19: 02
        Only in order of priority, you can sign up for a queue on the manufacturer’s website. Here, in addition to Moscow, they also want to buy air defense for protection. Why not create a private security company PROTECTION + PVO
        1. +1
          1 June 2023 21: 16
          Quote: Mikhail Maslov
          Here, in addition to Moscow, they also want to buy air defense for protection.

          The state should actually be engaged in the protection of airspace, which takes taxes and resource rent and not only air defense / missile defense, but also armor, uniforms, helmets, unloading, thermal imagers and first aid kits should not be bought by volunteers, wives and sponsors. Some offices in Moscow turned to the Moscow Region for help with air defense, to which they were told, they say, buy it yourself .. At first I thought it was a joke.
    2. +1
      1 June 2023 23: 14
      From the residents of Rublyovka, one can rather expect that they will chip in for these drones to Ukrainians, provided that they will not fly to Rublyovka :((
    3. +1
      2 June 2023 17: 28
      They didn't even have to take off. The electronic warfare machine arrived the next day, after they noticed the first flying UAV, and this was about two weeks before the attack. This is just what appeared. And the air defense was placed somewhere in the vicinity so that in the event of an attack, fragments would not fall on the head.
  13. +2
    1 June 2023 08: 35
    . Despite the novelty, they did not cope with the tasks. The devices were shot down or suppressed

    But they flew to Moscow. And three out of eight failed to shoot down.

    And if they didn’t fly to Moscow where there is no (so much) air defense and there is no suppression of GPS signals?
  14. 0
    1 June 2023 13: 34
    Quote: Stas157
    But they flew to Moscow. And three out of eight failed to shoot down.

    And if they didn’t fly to Moscow where there is no (so much) air defense and there is no suppression of GPS signals?


    They could not, because they themselves fell, but not without our help.
    Well, they would have raided some Muhosra ... k. Who would be interested in this?
    It is clear that the action is purely for the purposes of PR, publicity and nothing more. The element of information warfare has no practical significance.
  15. +3
    1 June 2023 18: 54
    What does it mean that they made an attempt? The very fact of flying over and attacking Moscow and the Moscow region is already a success. And all reports like "lost course, did not fly" are simply ridiculous. Yes, the attack was partially thwarted, but the very fact of the attack is a threat in the future. All reports of the Ministry of Defense about the creation of airspace control throughout Russia is simply a hoax. This is where all the mistakes must be taken into account.
  16. +1
    1 June 2023 20: 05
    The Investigative Committee opened a case under the article "Terrorism" and establishes those involved in the attack.

    Interestingly, after each raid on Kyiv and other cities, Ukrainians start a criminal case?
  17. 0
    1 June 2023 22: 56
    When terrorists blew up houses in Moscow and took hundreds of hostages (Nord-Ost), they solved the problem by flooding Chechnya with money and supporting the loyal Kadyrov teip. This will not work with banderlogs, they have long been on manual control due to a puddle. Soon these drones will fly by the dozens. This can only be stopped by martial law. The work of counterintelligence is not enough, there is too much freedom for citizens (mishandled Cossacks) to do whatever they want or on behalf of.
  18. +3
    2 June 2023 01: 07
    that the recent attack on Moscow failed not only because of the imperfection of Ukrainian strike weapons. Our air defense and electronic warfare systems played a key role in this.

    Why did these complexes of ours only work near Moscow? Are they just standing there? And at 800 km from the border with Ukraine and to the Moscow region, they are not at all? Unprotected space and a huge hole in air defense? So what happens? And if NATO decides to launch hundreds and thousands of cruise missiles with nuclear weapons, will they also be able to freely fly to Moscow and other cities? And we won’t even have time to answer with such an air defense system. How could this happen and why? And here you don’t have to pretend that nothing terrible happened, and our air defense worked out normally. This air defense system freely let through eight large enemy UAVs with explosives on board to the Moscow region and Moscow itself. This should not be the case and measures must be taken immediately to prevent such cases.
    1. 0
      2 June 2023 11: 34
      Quote: wladimirjankov
      This air defense system freely let through eight large enemy UAVs with explosives on board to the Moscow region and Moscow itself. This should not be the case and measures must be taken immediately to prevent such cases.

      It has already been reported that Moscow's air defense will be further strengthened. Nothing was said about the rest of the territory.
  19. 0
    2 June 2023 13: 53
    Quote: Mikhail Maslov
    The very fact of flying over and attacking Moscow and the Moscow region is already a success. And all the reports supposedly “lost course, didn’t fly” are simply ridiculous. Yes, the attack was partially thwarted, but the very fact of the attack is a threat in the future. airspace control, just a hoax. That's where you need to take into account all the mistakes


    And what, someone does not have such a threat? Do you think this is impossible in relation to the capital of another state?
    Well, maybe, excluding Tel Aviv / Jerusalem, and even that is not a fact.

    Control of the airspace is not equivalent to an air defense system capable of covering the entire territory of the country from all conceivable threats. There won't be enough resources to cover everyone. Especially if drones are also launched from our own territory (which most likely was).
  20. +1
    6 July 2023 00: 20
    The Ukrainians have already developed a bunch of drones themselves, when the Defense Ministry has still not mastered anything except Iranian shaheeds
  21. 0
    11 August 2023 08: 17
    Something similar to the fascist dances with the V against Britain. Which show that before death you will not inhale!
  22. -1
    11 August 2023 21: 33
    If UAV Beavers of this size flew almost to Moscow (the capital of a nuclear power), then this is the collapse of air defense, Panzerey and other things. That is, if their goals were not in Moscow, then they could hit anything on the way to it, no one bothered them. The article is kind of front.
    1. 0
      31 August 2023 11: 59
      "Panzer"?! Don't try to play analytics anymore. At least until you learn the rules of the Russian language.