Designs, technologies and materials: trends in the development of silent firing devices

42
Designs, technologies and materials: trends in the development of silent firing devices
Multi-chamber PBS type SOCOM300-SPS from SureFire. Photo SureFire


Since the beginning of the last century, the process of creating and improving silent firing devices (silencers) for small arms weapons. New designs and models of such products are regularly offered that have certain advantages. At the current stage, the further development of this entire area is facilitated by the emergence of a number of new technologies and materials. As a result, several important and interesting trends can now be observed that determine the further development of silencers.



Basic Ideas


As you know, the sound of a shot is formed from several components. The loudest wave is given by hot powder gases escaping from the muzzle behind the bullet. The Silent Firing Device (SFS) must contain these gases and prevent them from creating a sound wave. The basic principles of their retention were formed by the beginning of the last century. They are still in use today in one form or another.


Muffler with conical baffles in section. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

In general, it all comes down to installing a body with internal transverse partitions on the muzzle of the barrel, due to which the internal volume is divided into separate chambers. Partitions can be made of metal or in the form of rubber or polymer membranes with a hole / notch in the center. Baffles of any design allow the bullet to pass through the PBS, but retain gases. For better retention, the body cavities can be filled with mesh.

The principle of operation of the PBS is quite simple. The device passes a bullet through itself, but retains powder gases or makes it difficult for them to exit through the muzzle. As a result, the gases cool down and lose their ability to create a shock wave. The main component of the sound of the shot disappears.


Various options for the internal layout of the PBS. Graphics Wikimedia Commons

Partitions of various shapes and configurations, elastic membranes, mesh and various combinations of them were used both in early designs and in modern developments. At the same time, the development of science and technology in recent decades has provided new technologies and materials that help further improve designs.

Computer techologies


A significant contribution to the development of PBS at the current stage is made by computer development and design tools. With their help, the necessary research is carried out, as well as the search for designs with the optimal ratio of performance characteristics, manufacturability, etc. is carried out.


Muffler with mesh (visible in the holes in the front end). Photo Saimaa Still Oy

The key task in the development of PBS is the optimization of gas-dynamic processes inside the vessel. For quite a long time, software tools for simulating the flow of gases and their interaction with the internal devices of the silencer have been developed and improved. The use of computer models greatly simplifies and speeds up the search for optimal designs and subsequent development.

Just like in many other industries, computer-aided design systems are widespread. Digital systems allow faster and more efficient use of research results, preparation of technical documentation, and development of production processes. All these design features are useful both in the execution of army orders, and in the case of commercial products.


A disassembled Huntertown Kestrel product. In the background - the body, in front of it - partitions. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

Configuration complication


Computer simulation allows you to work out and study fundamentally new, bold and original configurations of chambers and baffles inside the muffler. Various foreign developers focused on the commercial market regularly present new PBS samples with some or other original features.

First of all, it was possible to move away from the traditional design with cylindrical chambers and flat or conical baffles. The new systems use inclined baffles and other elements that provide a more efficient redistribution of gases. The optimal size and volume of internal chambers is also selected.


PBS with partitions in the form of a single unit. Photo Gorilla Ammunition

Quite a long time ago, the idea of ​​replaceable partitions and membranes appeared, which makes it possible to extend the operation of the PBS. This modular approach has taken an interesting development in recent years. Several variants of silencers have been created, assembled from single cylindrical modules, each of which contains one partition. The modules are threaded into a single product of the required length with the required level of noise reduction.

Materials and production


Both in the past and now, various grades of steel remain the main material for the production of PBS. Both the body and internal partitions are made of them. Rubber was used for elastic membranes. Other materials have also been developed and introduced - various alloys to match the loads and polymers with improved characteristics.


Modular PBS MODX-45, printed from titanium powder. Sig Sauer Photos

In recent years, titanium has become quite a popular solution in the field of materials. This material allows you to make more complex structures that can withstand higher loads. At the same time, the finished product retains an acceptable weight. The main disadvantage of titanium PBS is its high cost. However, expensive products also find their buyers - such mufflers appeared in the product catalogs of almost all manufacturers.

Production technologies are also developing. The most attention is now attracted by the so-called. additive manufacturing. It is not always possible to manufacture silencer elements that have an optimal configuration in terms of performance using “traditional” technologies. XNUMXD metal printing, incl. titanium makes it possible to solve these problems. At the same time, a modern production method can be combined with new designs. For example, it is more profitable to print the elements of a modular PBS, and not otherwise manufacture and assemble from smaller parts.


Strange experiments: MP5 submachine gun with a modular PBS Erector 9 from the company Q. Using an excessive number of modules leads to bending of the entire structure, due to which the bullet can hit the partitions. Frame from video from Demolition Ranch

Results and prospects


Silent shooting devices of various kinds have long and firmly taken their place in the field of small arms, and you should not expect that they will ever be abandoned. On the contrary, this trend will continue to develop and produce new interesting results. Modern developments in the field of materials science, production, design tools, etc. will help to further improve the designs.

We should also expect the preservation or growth of demand for PBS from the armies and other customers. So, at present, a new set of small arms for infantry is being developed in the United States. It uses a high power cartridge with appropriate noise performance. In this regard, new rifles and machine guns are equipped with a standard silencer.


Automatic rifle NGSW from Textron with a standard silencer. Photo Vpk.name

Actual weapons may also need such equipment. Thus, the Russian units involved in the current Special Operation massively receive and use PBS of various types, created for Kalashnikov assault rifles. With the help of such products, greater convenience and efficiency in solving combat missions are provided.

In a number of foreign countries, the civil market also has a positive effect on the development of silencers. Moreover, it is often the commercial developments of different companies that contribute to the emergence and implementation of new technical solutions, technologies, etc. Often, projects for the market are converted into products for the armies and vice versa.

Thus, the PBS direction is actively developing, and finished products are widely used. Such trends will obviously continue in the future. What ideas and technologies will be introduced thanks to this, and what designs based on them will appear, time will tell. There are no prerequisites for a change in such trends yet.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    28 May 2023 04: 26
    The author wrote, but he did not write about "the trend in the development of silent firing devices".
    Today, "wet" mufflers are gaining popularity, in which expansion chambers are filled with ablation materials (ablation is the removal of mass from the surface of a solid body by a stream of hot gases flowing around this surface). Water, foam, gels, mineral oils are used as such materials.

    This design allows you to significantly increase the efficiency of the muffler without increasing the dimensions.
    Silencers have appeared that use the phenomenon of destructive interference. The design is made in such a way that the flow of muzzle gases is divided into two flows that extinguish each other.
    1. -3
      28 May 2023 06: 23
      "all this is from the evil one" because: it’s just that a lot of “engineers” (in quotes) have been born who, in all sorts of solidworks, conduct simulations of mufflers and release another “innovative” (in quotes) muffler, only the joke is that there computer models are designed for slow flows, and are unsuitable for calculating the processes of super-hyper-hydro-sound, and here, without a difference, the processes of cavitation, plasma-chemo-aggregation, or something similar from the same area, these models and ordinary computers are not suitable for all this.
    2. 0
      4 June 2023 20: 16
      trends? Truth ? and who adopted. who is this genius that gave his fighters enemas so that they fill silencers with oil, glycerin, foam and what else is there on the battlefield? the army does not need an overly silent weapon to the detriment of practicality, otherwise the Americans would not have accepted the XK MK23 45 caliber, they would have taken 9mm which are quieter for any reason, no one even uses silencers with rubber bands for the same reason they are simply not practical
  2. +1
    28 May 2023 04: 36

    Walter is handsome ... very convenient for concealed carry ... only the silencer spoils everything ... round and screwed to the gun is inconvenient and inconvenient to carry in your pocket.
  3. 0
    28 May 2023 05: 05
    Vote, don't vote... Even with "ablative" you will get something. Because It makes no sense to jam a supersonic bullet, with any silencer there will be a demand for AKM, if we are talking about Kalash. Because the subsonic bullet is heavier, and therefore at least somehow lethal.
    And it’s also funny that any clown who screwed a can on the barrel is sure that he walks with a silencer) The thing is also useful, but for a little for other purposes
    1. 0
      28 May 2023 05: 24
      Quote from Bingo
      Because It makes no sense to jam a supersonic bullet, with any silencer there will be a demand for AKM, if we are talking about Kalash. Because the subsonic bullet is heavier, and therefore at least somehow lethal.

      Agree Yes

      Quote from Bingo
      And it’s also funny that any clown who screwed a can on the barrel is sure that he walks with a silencer) The thing is also useful, but for a little for other purposes

      The "clown" may also consider that his "can" for a weapon with an equipped magazine: one cartridge with a tracer bullet through two with an ordinary one, and also a flash suppressor that does not unmask its position, especially at night. wink
      1. 0
        28 May 2023 07: 45
        Quote: Lynx2000
        his "can" for a weapon with an equipped magazine: one cartridge with a tracer bullet through two with an ordinary

        Oh yeah. Watched it too, love it :)
    2. +2
      28 May 2023 12: 28
      "PBS"-ki began to be used more often for another reason - it extinguishes the flash of a shot well.
      Yes, and it is not necessary to completely muffle the sound of a shot.
  4. 0
    28 May 2023 05: 23
    As a result, the gases cool down and lose their ability to create a shock wave.

    Interesting explanation...
    I thought that the exit of gases is stretched in time and, accordingly, there is no such velocity of outflow of gases at which a powerful sound wave is formed. And here it turns out it is necessary to cool the gases.
    1. +1
      28 May 2023 11: 56
      I thought that the exit of gases is stretched in time and, accordingly, there is no such velocity of outflow of gases at which a powerful sound wave is formed. And here it turns out it is necessary to cool the gases.
      About the cooling of combustion products. They cool themselves (adiabatic expansion), but this does not prevent them from creating a shock wave. In fact, when fired, two shock waves are formed - muzzle and ballistic. With a subsonic bullet, there is no ballistic one, as in this photo of a shot from a revolver.
  5. -4
    28 May 2023 05: 59
    For several years I have been offering the technology of an ultra-long sniper shot from 3 m to 000 m - 5 m and more. After firing a small charge (and this is silent); the bullet flies out of the barrel and a jet engine is turned on (instead of a tracer charge) or a vortex engine (suggested by Skolkovo, Batyr Batyrov for a long time), the bullet flies at over (hyper) sound speed (perhaps Daggers fly today); a tungsten bullet - titanium (composite) pierces a lightly armored target - these are infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers and others. Offered: Barnaul, Tula, Novosibirsk Cartridge Plant (offered TsNIItochmash), Kalashnikov Concern, Chukavin, Lobaev (they promised if there was demand they would contact) - alas, they are silent, they don’t even answer, the SVO is on (and you’ll think that only traitors, enemies of Russia are sitting there ) or have long been sent to their owners and chic in Bali or ... .
    1. +5
      28 May 2023 07: 23
      Watch Konev, a series of films "I want to be a weapons designer" well, so that delusional thoughts do not go into my head.
      1. 0
        28 May 2023 10: 08
        I personally know Kostya Konev. Note. in 2008 he was in Kyiv, hoping to hear smart thoughts ... I didn’t hear anything surprising from him. He considers himself an unrecognized genius. In Belarus, he was "not appreciated", he moved to Ukraine. Somehow I got hooked .. "Zbroyar", like, organized (in his words). You have to watch his movie.
        1. 0
          12 July 2023 14: 26
          Quote from Wolfskin1993
          He considers himself an unrecognized genius

          I have the same opinion after watching his videos. But as a gunsmith, I rate it a four with a minus. It has gaps and very significant ones. There is no real vein. Not only weapons, but even engineering.
    2. 0
      28 May 2023 19: 02
      bullet tungsten - titanium
      What to sharpen the barrel for such a bullet?
      Bronze zhakan and then breaks a smooth trunk.
    3. 0
      28 May 2023 21: 49
      Well, got it. Well, it hit. What's next? The bullet is small. The mass is small. It will not create a jet of micro-shards like a normal sub-caliber. AND?
    4. 0
      4 June 2023 18: 56
      Kolya, do you have a diagram of a jet engine, so that they don’t turn you around from the threshold and don’t laugh in the back? a jet propulsor that will operate 8km at hypersonic speeds and at the same time fit in a bullet, well, at least not even 12,7mm but 20mm, then with such a thing you can fly to Mars Elon you are our homegrown mask)
  6. +10
    28 May 2023 06: 09
    Some kind of clumsy translation of some foreign article.
    There is not a single word about BRAMIT (silencer of the Mitin brothers), nor about cartridges with a cut-off of powder gases, nor about engineer Gurevich's cartridge with "water" filling.
    When will VO admins return the "negative asterisk" to articles?
    1. +1
      28 May 2023 23: 43
      Victor, what does "admins will introduce" mean? Bees against honey chtol? Ryabov is their full-time copyist, who, with his content, dilutes reposts from various other translators and distributors.
  7. +6
    28 May 2023 06: 19
    3 m to 000 m - 5

    The question is ... how many seconds will the bullet fly 8 km, taking into account the variable and headwind, and how to point the bullet at the enemy with such a range?
    What is the meaning of such a development? what
    1. +3
      28 May 2023 10: 10
      So, as I understand it, we are talking about the mini "Dagger". Hypersonic, reactive homing bullet !!! GE!!! And once again Gee-Gee!!!
    2. +1
      28 May 2023 21: 51
      Sounds great for students! Titanium-tungsten active-reactive bullets!
    3. 0
      12 July 2023 14: 29
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      What is the meaning of such a development?

      Prove that the earth is flat. In flat terrain, the horizon goes beyond 5 km.
  8. 0
    28 May 2023 06: 25
    A shot of a supersonic cartridge, alas, cannot be drowned out by PBS with a supersonic pop of a bullet exit. That's why subsonic cartridges are used! Plus also cartridges like SPS and MPS!
    1. +1
      28 May 2023 07: 50
      This is not necessary. It is enough to reduce the sound of the shot from the side of the shooter and his neighbors to 140 dB so that the shooter is not deaf and can hear the commands of the commander or something else. And there will be less ringing in the ears after shooting.
  9. 0
    28 May 2023 08: 06
    In my subjective opinion, relying on "computer technology" is a delusion.
    Yes, it's good for marketing and sales - they showed a beautiful picture, an intricate form, promised super-characteristics, and now they "flooded" sales.
    But the very dominance of CADs turns the bulk of designers and developers in addition to this software product.
    A person stops thinking with his head.
    Mathematical models of such complex processes as gas dynamics in a silencer, with heat exchange and so on, are very approximate and primitive.
    The real test will never be replaced.
    And as a result, we have what we have, and not only in mufflers - a bunch of people have been modeling something for decades, showing beautiful pictures, mastering houliards of budget rubles, and T-54s are going to the NVO zone ...
    And the questions why? Complain about lack of funding...
    1. +2
      28 May 2023 09: 52
      But the very dominance of CADs turns the bulk of designers and developers in addition to this software product.
      A person stops thinking with his head.

      Apparently, you are informed about this issue in much the same way as the author of the article and similar writers who present the use of CAD as some outstanding modern achievement. Meanwhile, CAD has been in use for no less than seventy years, and the first commercially available computer-aided design system DAC-1 appeared on the market in 1963, that is, sixty years ago.
      And not a single CAD system by itself designs anything and cannot replace the head of a designer, just like full-scale tests. It just makes the job easier and faster. It's a tool, nothing more. And the fact that for some this tool gives only advertising pictures to the mountain - this is not a CAD problem, it is a problem of the one who uses it. Brushes and paints can also be used in different ways. You can paint the fence, or you can draw the "Ninth Wave".
  10. +3
    28 May 2023 08: 51
    Quote: nikolai55soot
    For several years I have been offering the technology of an ultra-long sniper shot from 3 m to 000 m - 5 m and more. After firing a small charge (and this is silent); the bullet flies out of the barrel and a jet engine is turned on (instead of a tracer charge) or a vortex engine (suggested by Skolkovo, Batyr Batyrov for a long time), the bullet flies at over (hyper) sound speed (perhaps Daggers fly today); a tungsten bullet - titanium (composite) pierces a lightly armored target - these are infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers and others.


    I'm not sure that with the current level of technology development it will be possible to develop such a bullet.
    To ensure that a small target is hit at such a distance, the flight of the ammunition must be correctable, controlled. Especially if the reactive principle is used. In fact, it will be a micro-rocket with a seeker. "Dagger" is, as it were, a guided weapon, right?
    E-mine, nanotechnology is indispensable here! And what kind of element base will it be, which will be so compact, but at the same time withstand enormous overloads (and temperatures)?

    Even if it is possible to create such a "miracle bullet", it will cost no less than the Krasnopol projectile.
    As a project for cutting the budget dough - very good. But from a practical standpoint... the "science fiction" section is upstairs. laughing
    1. 0
      29 May 2023 12: 22
      Offhand, fantasy.
      https://topwar.ru/1818-upravlyaemye-puli-uzhe-ne-fantastika.html
      https://topwar.ru/10779-samonavodyaschayasya-pulya-novyy-vid-intellektualnogo-oruzhiya.html
      https://topwar.ru/13277-v-chem-sekret-samonavodyascheysya-puli.html
      And someone called drones, also like a computer game, but that's how it turned out.
  11. 0
    28 May 2023 08: 56
    Quote from Bingo
    Because it makes no sense to jam a supersonic bullet,


    The meaning is still there. They already jam at sniper rifles (Lobaevsky, in particular), and they have supersonic bullets. It is clear that it is impossible to completely muffle the sound, but this is not required. It is enough that the sound of the shot (as well as the flame from the barrel) is not detected by the enemy at a distance of destruction (more than 800 meters, as a rule).
  12. +3
    28 May 2023 09: 11
    The author of this article did not bother to say a single word about exactly how many decibels the sound of a shot is reduced by different types of silencers. And also there is no comparison of what sound all other components of the shot give - for example, the mechanical impacts of the steel parts of the shutter against each other. And also the question of the strength of the sound of a supersonic bullet is unknown - how far will an enemy soldier hear this supersonic bullet from himself?
  13. +5
    28 May 2023 11: 52
    Quote: Amateur
    Some kind of clumsy translation of some foreign article.

    When will VO admins return the "negative asterisk" to articles?

    Why are we surprised, author Kirill Ryabov! The most unique writer on the VO website! When you read his masterpieces, you immediately understand whose signature under the article will be))
    1. +1
      28 May 2023 19: 08
      So here all regular authors have their own "handwriting". They are known not only in person. laughing
  14. -1
    28 May 2023 23: 01
    If we do not consider the design of the PBS for small-scale weapons intended for a small series of shots, then obviously there are natural requirements for the design:
    1. Easy dismantling and cleaning of the device from carbon deposits.
    2. The ability to replace the most worn out elements of the device, without throwing away even whole structural elements.
    Based on these requirements, it is logical to give preference to systems in which:
    A. The external forms of the hull are not cylindrical, but have turnkey planes.
    b. Internal elements are type-setting and of the same type, allowing them to be easily washed and cleaned.
    V. Internal elements are mass-produced, maybe. even stamping, because in some way it is a consumable.
  15. +2
    29 May 2023 06: 08
    Quote from Frettaskyrandi
    Apparently, you are informed about this issue in much the same way as the author of the article and similar writers who present the use of CAD as some outstanding modern achievement. Meanwhile, CAD has been in use for no less than seventy years, and the first commercially available computer-aided design system DAC-1 appeared on the market in 1963, that is, sixty years ago.

    I work as a designer, subordinate to a small design group (up to 10 people maximum), I know everything perfectly "from the inside". That is why I am writing. we develop and manufacture equipment. Not very complex - up to several hundred unique parts (that is, for each of its drawings) in the product - but not very simple either.
    Modern CAD - the same compass - in many cases greatly simplifies the life of a designer - it is enough to make a 3D model, indicate the entry - and he himself will form a package of drawings and specifications. The need for routine disappears, or it is largely reduced. But this also forces the designer to immediately start with the model. And if I have already thought of everything, roughly calculated the kinematics, all the parameters, and gave him the task - to do this and that - or even issued a prototype - a set of documentation - and said to make small changes - then everything works out.
    But when you simply give this designer - and in a simple way - a draftsman - a task - to develop this or that unit or assembly - he falls into prostration, and tries to find something to take as a basis and redo it - that is, to start his work anyway with 3D models. He's so used to it.
    This does not correlate in any way with the collection of information on similar products, the analysis of characteristics, and so on - that is, how, in accordance with the basic principles, a product is developed "from scratch".

    In the zero years, I myself very actively introduced all this computer graphics - starting with AutoCAD 14 - I also found drawing boards and drawing paper - and I will say that this (drawing boards and those designers) was not so bad. Even vice versa.

    What design experience do you have?
  16. 0
    29 May 2023 13: 19
    Quote: Goto
    https://topwar.ru/1818-upravlyaemye-puli-uzhe-ne-fantastika.html


    The article is almost 13 years old. Well, where are these "fantastic" bullets practically used? It seems that enough time has passed for the completion of R&D and for mass production.
    So who, where and how successfully used them in combat conditions?

    Or, as usual: they drank the budget dough, and then everything slowly died out?
    Like, the grapes turned out to be green again?

    Only 3-4% of such developments reach practical implementation and application.
  17. 0
    29 May 2023 15: 22
    Quote: Andrey Moskvin
    Bronze Jackan and then the smooth trunk breaks.


    so you make a plastic container for it - and there are no problems
  18. 0
    29 May 2023 15: 25
    [quote = Vladimir-TTT] [quote = Frettaskyrandi] C
    How much design experience do you have?[/quote]
    T-flex, Compass, AutoCad
  19. 0
    30 May 2023 14: 34
    Dulo. "There was a strong blow in the window, Stirlitz closed the window and the barrel disappeared." The muzzle will probably be more correct.
  20. 0
    18 July 2023 08: 48
    (PBS) must contain these gases and prevent them from creating a sound wave.
    And how will the device "keep" the gases? Will it be a balloon the size of a human head? Or will he show porn to the gases in order to keep them at the screen? God, shame...
    Mr. Ryabov, did you go to school? That is, in our country, and not in some Wisconsin? Oh, f... In general, let Mr. Ryabov stay in the editorial office on a Moscow salary for nothing. The task of the PBS is to reduce the power of the sound wave created by the powder gases. It seems obvious that there are two ways to solve this problem.
    The first way is to deprive the powder gases of some of the energy that they have after they finish their job of pushing the bullet out of the bore. Most of the structures in the photographs are trying to do just that - to slow down the gases by creating labyrinth structures, where the gases will lose energy when they collide with the walls of these labyrinths. Something works, although the efficiency of the BRAMIT device is much higher than the newfangled photogenic slums presented here. Due to the fact that photogenicity is the main goal of creating this junk.
    The second way is to try to break the front of the sound wave, to break its shape, by shifting the sound of the shot so that it is less perceived, at least by the human ear. This path is much more promising, but it requires very serious research, which is clearly not available to the suppliers of the Defense Ministry and special services. Since much more technological designs, drawn from the bulldozer, focusing solely on the capabilities of machine tools operated by low-paid personnel, also sell well thanks to the peculiar Ministry of Defense corruption that blooms around the world.
    Oh yes, I forgot. There are cartridges that really provide for the retention of gases inside the sleeve. If they weren’t a little more powerful than a shot from an average quality slingshot, it would be great ...
    In general, at the moment the most effective muffler is a gasoline filter from a car, which is a can filled with steel mesh of different sections. The grid package works many times better at extinguishing the energy of gases than all the presented designs)) Moreover, such a "silencer" can be freely bought at a car shop. You just need to drill a channel in it so that it is not torn off by the first shot))
  21. 0
    18 July 2023 22: 02
    My opinion, as a hunter who served 10 years and a hunter with 25 years of experience, is a normal long barrel and special cartridges with a closed sleeve like the PSS, but now you can work with a bullet and a sleeve, and all these PBS or jars are only for films.
  22. 0
    18 November 2023 12: 51
    Sorry, old crazy topic, didn't pay attention.