Combat use and losses of F-16 Fighting Falcon fighters

28
Combat use and losses of F-16 Fighting Falcon fighters
Fighter F-16C from the US Air Force. Photo by the US Department of Defense


In the early seventies, the American company General Dynamics developed a promising light fighter F-16 Fighting Falcon. By the end of the decade, he entered service with the US Air Force, and then export deliveries began. For 45 years of service, the Falcons of different countries regularly participated in various military operations and solved combat missions. At the same time, the fighters naturally suffered losses.



Development and records


Recall that the decision to develop the future F-16 was made in the late sixties, taking into account the experience of the Vietnam War. In 1972, within a few months, the US Air Force issued tactical and technical requirements for a new aircraft, received applications from aircraft manufacturers and selected participants in the competition. The winner of this stage in 1975 was the YF-16 project from General Dynamics.

By this time, General Dynamics had managed to build and fly a prototype aircraft of a new type. Tests continued until 1977-78, and in parallel, mass production was being prepared. Soon the deliveries of equipment to the troops began, and in August 1978 the first squadron on the F-16 reached initial operational readiness.

In the future, deliveries of the F-16 to the US Air Force continued, and orders from foreign countries soon arrived. Over the past decades, the Sokol entered service with approx. 25 countries around the world. To date, at least 4,6-4,7 thousand aircraft in various modifications have been built, and most of this equipment remains in service. Thanks to this, the F-16 is currently the most massive aircraft in operation.

First fights


By the beginning of the eighties, Israel received its F-16s, and it was its Air Force that first used such equipment in combat. The F-16 won its first aerial victory in April 1981 over the Bekaa Valley. An Israeli fighter jet using an air-to-air missile tried to hit a Syrian Mi-8 helicopter. The missile missed its target and the Israeli pilot used the cannon. In July of that year, another F-16 shot down an enemy aircraft for the first time.


An F-16 launches an AIM-9X air-to-air missile. Raytheon Photos

In 1981-82. there was another deterioration in the situation in the region, and several air battles took place. The Israeli side reported that its F-16s in total hit more than 40 enemy planes and helicopters in the face of Syria. The Syrian side only partially confirmed these losses. At the same time, they claimed the destruction of five F-16s and several aircraft of other types - although Israel predictably denies this.

The Israeli Air Force subsequently repeatedly used its F-16s and other fighters, but this use had its own characteristics. Thus, the main part of the IDF Air Force operations is carried out against formations that do not pose a threat to aviation. Operations against well-equipped forces, in turn, are planned to minimize risks. As a result, in the XXI century. only non-combat losses of fighters took place.

Pakistani experience


Another recipient of American F-16s in the eighties was the Pakistan Air Force, and in the second half of the decade their combat use began. Until 1989, inclusive, 10 air victories were recorded at the expense of Pakistani fighters - these were mainly combat and transport aircraft of the Afghan Air Force. In April 1987 one F-16 was shot down. The DRA Air Force called it their success, but the Pakistani side spoke of the defeat by friendly fire.

During the 1999 Kargil War, Pakistani F-16s regularly flew patrols and covered the border. There were meetings with Indian aircraft, but everything was limited only to escorting and irradiating the radar. There were no fights or losses.

During the next deterioration of the Indian-Pakistani relations in 2019, it came to air battles. The Pakistani side announced the defeat of several enemy aircraft; all successes were credited to the F-16. India initially denied this information, but then confirmed the loss of one aircraft of the old model. At the same time, one Pakistani Fighting Falcon was declared defeated.

In the US Air Force


The US Air Force, the first to receive F-16 aircraft, did not use them in combat for the first time until 1991, during operations in the Middle East. So, during Desert Storm, light F-16s were used only as fighter-bombers. The fight for the air was entrusted to the F-15 aircraft. The 250 involved Sokolovs completed more than 13 sorties and destroyed a large number of ground targets or provided target designation with another strike tool.


Israeli F-16I. Photo by AOI

The F-16 did not enter into air battles, and did not have victories. At the same time, they suffered minor losses. According to official data, the Iraqi army's air defense systems and MANPADS shot down three American F-16s. Four more were able to return to base, but were written off due to damage.

Later, F-16s from the US Air Force participated in securing a no-fly zone over Iraq. In December 1992, the American F-16 scored its first aerial victory - an Iraqi MiG-25 was shot down. A few weeks later they hit the MiG-23.

During the 2003 intervention, F-16 fighter-bombers were again used only in the strike role. This time it was possible to do without significant losses. During the main battles, only one aircraft was lost, and for technical reasons. Three more fighters crashed in 2006-2008. due to pilot error or technical reasons.

Fighters over the Balkans


F-16s from several countries at once participated in the hostilities in the territories of the disintegrating Yugoslavia. This theater was mainly operated by US aircraft. The air forces of Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and Turkey were also involved. At various times, the Fighting Falcon was used both for patrolling and combating air targets, and for attacking ground targets. At the same time, air battles took place quite rarely - due to the organization of a no-fly zone and the destruction of enemy aircraft on the ground.

The first air battle took place over Bosnia and Herzegovina in February 1994. Two pairs of American F-16s spotted six Yugoslav attack aircraft and shot down four. The next air victory took place only in 1999 - a pair of US Air Force F-16s engaged Yugoslav MiG-29s.

During operations in the Balkans, the United States lost several F-16s. The first in June 1995 shot down the Yugoslav Kvadrat air defense system. Three more aircraft were written off during that period due to damage or technical problems. In May 1999, another Sokol was lost, this time due to the impact of the S-125 air defense system. At the same time, the Yugoslav side spoke of a greater number of downed aircraft, although it could not confirm all the applications.


Turkish Air Force F-16 with Turkish-designed weapons. Roketsan Photos

F-16s from other countries also participated in the intervention, but did not show much success in air combat. They were mainly used as bombers, which did not contribute to the increase in combat scores. Only one pilot of the Netherlands Air Force on the F-16 in 1999 managed to shoot down the Yugoslav MiG-29.

Local conflicts


In the 16s and XNUMXs, F-XNUMXs from various countries were actively used in various low-intensity conflicts that took place in the Middle East and North Africa. All these operations are united by a small number of air battles, as well as minimal threats from enemy air defenses. Such factors limit the possible number of air victories, but at the same time reduce the risks for aircraft and their pilots.

In 2011, a number of foreign states participated in the intervention in Libya, and some of them involved F-16 fighters. Fighting Falcons from the Air Forces of Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, the United Arab Emirates and the United States participated in securing the no-fly zone and carried out air-to-surface strikes. At the same time, there were no air battles, victories and losses.

Another "international coalition" soon intervened in the war in Syria on the side of opponents of the legitimate government. A few years later, the same countries began to support Iraq in the fight against the newly emerged major terrorist organization. Again, it was mainly about strikes against ground targets with a minimum number of air battles.

Türkiye most actively used its fighters in the original role. To date, 5-7 aircraft and helicopters of the Syrian Air Force have been reported hit by Turkish F-16s. In particular, it was a pair of Sokolovs that shot down a Russian Su-2015 bomber in November 24. According to various sources, from 2013-14. at least 2-3 Turkish F-16s were shot down by fire from the ground or received damage incompatible with further operation.

Another group of states has been participating in the civil war in Yemen since 2015, supporting one of the parties. F-16 fighters from Bahrain, Jordan, Morocco and the United Arab Emirates take part in this conflict. Due to the lack of aviation among the Houthis, coalition aircraft operate only in a strike role. In 2015-17 the Moroccan and Jordanian air forces lost at least two aircraft.

Mixed experience


The General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon light multirole fighter was developed almost half a century ago and has been in service for 45 years. If necessary, various upgrades are carried out aimed at the growth of certain characteristics and capabilities. During the operation, the F-16s were repeatedly and actively used in real military operations and clearly demonstrated their combat potential.

In general, practice has shown that the F-16s of all modifications are quite capable of solving the assigned combat missions - to patrol, search for and hit air targets or attack ground targets. At the same time, certain successes are achieved and the combat score is growing. At the same time, the Falcon is not invulnerable. In real conflicts, such aircraft were even hit by obsolete air defense systems. There were no losses only in situations where the enemy did not have sufficient air defense.

Obviously, the meeting of the F-16 even with the latest modifications with modern anti-aircraft systems and / or fighters will be associated with even greater risks. It is for this reason that a few decades ago, the US Air Force decided to develop a new generation of fighter aircraft to replace the F-16 in the future. Such rearmament has already begun and is successfully moving forward.

Meanwhile, some foreign countries and regimes still tend to overestimate the rather old F-16. Despite the objective obsolescence, he is considered a kind of miracleweaponsthat could turn the tide of modern conflict. How long they will maintain such illusions is unknown. But measures are already being taken, the result of which may be another test of American fighters in practice - and the possible collapse of the hopes placed on them.
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    24 May 2023 05: 00
    And why did the British Air Force Typhoons drag it here? In the photo, where the Greek F-16Cs should be, there are two RAF Eurofighter Typhoons.
  2. +13
    24 May 2023 05: 29
    The F-16 had a bunch of modifications, I counted 15 on Wikipedia, it was constantly improved, the last one took off in 2003, so this aircraft is no more outdated than the Su-35 modification of the Su-27. You mentioned this in passing. Yes, it is outdated for the USA, but not for us.
    1. +2
      24 May 2023 17: 34
      F - 16 is good when it is used in accordance with NATO (Israel) tactics. That is, Avax rules everyone, an electronic warfare aircraft jams the enemy’s radar, a couple of “eagles” are on cover, if you need to “chop off” the tail flying for refueling. Where is all this in Ukraine? Not to mention airfields and ground staff. The Americans themselves say that without all of the above, the F-16 has no chance. That's why they don't want to give it.
  3. -6
    24 May 2023 05: 39
    The F-16 for NATO is like the Messerschmitt-109 for the Luftwaffe of Nazi Germany ... the machine is well-developed and relatively cheap ... but there is also a bolt for this nut.
    I was pleased with the message about the operation of our S-350 in automatic mode ... several enemy aircraft were shot down ... the operators only watched the operation of this system ... so the F-16 will be a guinea pig for our air defense.
    1. +13
      24 May 2023 07: 49
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      I was pleased with the message about the operation of our S-350 in automatic mode ... several enemy aircraft were shot down ... the operators only watched the operation of this system

      Are you talking about the Bryansk region?
    2. +4
      24 May 2023 15: 15
      Do not brag about going to the army (c) Folk wisdom
    3. -2
      24 May 2023 18: 05
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      Pleased with the message

      well, rejoice .... rejoice ...
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      of our S-350 in automatic mode ... several enemy aircraft were shot down ...

      according to Konashenkov, more than 400 out of 150 letaks have already been shot down with 40 confirmed photos / videos / obituaries of pilots as evidence ....
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      so the F-16 will be a guinea pig for our air defense.

      will be .... will be .... everything will be ...
  4. +18
    24 May 2023 05: 40
    A serious machine, in conjunction with Western air defense systems, even more serious.
    The application experience is gigantic, the statistics, although disputed, are still impressive.
    So you don’t need to throw hats on, you need to start preparing.
    So it didn't work out like in the Bekaa Valley
    1. +1
      24 May 2023 22: 29
      Well, soon. I'm glad a serious opponent - a serious game. Now the picture is emerging - what, where and when? It would be cool to see - the Crimean bridge, when and in what way?
      Let's be honest - we all understand that everything will come true soon))
  5. +3
    24 May 2023 06: 21
    Quote: kaufman
    So you don’t need to throw hats on, you need to start preparing.

    But to say that everything is gone is not the end for us either. smile
    Everything that is happening now has long been clear to serious analysts ... smile only the Kremlin's inappropriate behavior is incomprehensible ...
    After all, they warned that NATO would break all the promises and advance to the borders of Russia ... they warned that the Minsk agreements were a dead end and a great stupidity.
    Now we are witnessing the sad consequences of short-sighted decisions since the 1990s ... so to speak, the evidence of all problems ...WAR.
    Clearly this is a systemic problem...clearly this crisis will lead to a classic resolution. smile
    It is enough to open Capital or the works of Ulyanov-Lenin ... everything is said there about the current situation in the world.
    Although I am not a communist ... but I perfectly see all the flaws of our and the world system of states ... wars and crises are provided for us for life.
    Peaceful life is over ... a series of wars awaits us.
  6. +11
    24 May 2023 08: 25
    What a thing, it flies on one engine, and the penguin also over the seas, including no one screams about insufficient reliability!
    How so, and? wink
    1. +1
      24 May 2023 12: 03
      In short - so far they have done 4 thousand pieces - they have learned to do it reliably. But for 190 F-22, for example, they didn’t have time (even though there are two engines, but there are enough other problems). It's just that reliability has a high price in the form of lengthy tests and ... sometimes, losses. And, strange as it may seem, a single-engine aircraft is more reliable, because it’s easier (if it’s for failures), with proper operation, of course. If we analyze in terms of resistance to damage, spaced engines give some reliability (as, for example, on the A-10, Su-25, Tu-22), and even then only against MZA fire and fragments from afar, a good hit by a rocket leaves no chance. They put 2 engines not for reasons of reliability, but when exactly 2 times more thrust is needed (with high unification of power plants between light and heavy MFIs) for large performance characteristics. Sometimes you can't do without it - the F-16 "Dagger", for example, will not lift - but there are relatively few such aircraft needed. And the basis of the Air Force should be just such a relatively inexpensive, mass-produced and reliable aircraft, supported by the manufacturer throughout the life cycle.
    2. 0
      24 May 2023 22: 11
      The USSR Air Force also lacked single-engine vehicles. In the "new" Russia, the thesis was born that they are not necessary and unreliable. So in our "new" there are many paradoxical theses, and against their background, "single-engine" is far from the most ridiculous and obvious.
  7. -1
    24 May 2023 09: 17
    Author Respect drinks
    Thanks! Informative!
  8. +2
    24 May 2023 11: 58
    In the Afghan war, not only Afghan Air Force aircraft were shot down, but also Soviet attack aircraft. As elsewhere, there is a tale that one F-16 was shot down from a Mig-23im cannon.
    1. MSN
      +5
      24 May 2023 13: 11
      Rutskoy A.V. The GSS Major General was just shot down on the Su-25 by the Pakistani F-16.
    2. -1
      24 May 2023 22: 51
      Quote: Pavel57
      there is a tale that one F-16 was shot down from a Mig-23im cannon.

      This victory is written not for the cannon, but for the R-24 rocket. Although, most likely, there was neither one nor the other.
    3. 0
      25 May 2023 11: 39
      As elsewhere, there is a tale that one F-16 was shot down from a Mig-23im cannon.

      To be honest, it looks exactly like a "skaz".
  9. -6
    24 May 2023 13: 36
    Excellent peacetime combat training aircraft
    1. MSN
      +2
      24 May 2023 14: 56
      Undoubtedly. Operation Opera is a good combat training mission. Yes?
  10. +2
    24 May 2023 15: 06
    Quote: MSN
    Rutskoy A.V. The GSS Major General was just shot down on the Su-25 by the Pakistani F-16.

    Then Rutskoi was a colonel.
  11. +3
    24 May 2023 17: 25
    Why feel sorry for other people's planes? It is necessary to write down as many as possible. The commission will not fly to check who will let her out and let her in. Write more at home and in the pub tell how you are with their right and left hands, and your teeth flew out like frightened flies.
    1. 0
      25 May 2023 00: 12
      The commission is not going anywhere. It is enough to look at the data of objective control, everything is there - where did you shoot, what did you shoot at, who did you hit.
  12. -9
    24 May 2023 19: 04
    According to available information, the technical ability to detect and destroy enemy targets for Russian ground attack fighters is one and a half times greater than that of the F-16. The speed capabilities of Russian aircraft are higher. There are practically no pilots with combat experience left in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and the United States and NATO countries do not have many pilots with combat experience adequate to Russian pilots. And the air defense forces and technical support from Russia can be said at hand. So ....
    1. +3
      24 May 2023 23: 11
      Please list the types of aircraft of "Russian attack fighters". intrigued
  13. 0
    24 May 2023 20: 11
    it is considered some kind of miracle weapon that can turn the tide of modern conflict
    Who considers it a miracle weapon? But he may well influence (not reverse) the course of the conflict, if he is in sufficient numbers and with the necessary weapons ...
  14. 0
    25 May 2023 11: 49
    I think you need to analyze the aircraft separately by category, taking into account different sides
    1. Victories in air battles
    2. Shot down in dogfights
    3. It is possible to work on the ground
    4. Vulnerability from SAM.
    The aircraft has been used for a very long time, actively participated in hostilities, and many times. In this scenario, the analysis of real applications is more important than comparing numbers "on paper".
    He draws attention from the article that there are practically no cases of those shot down in air battles, although he repeatedly participated in them.
    In terms of losses from air defense systems and work on the ground, I think, in general, Israel's experience is comparable to the current situation (although not in all operations, of course). I think that in these categories the nomenclature of the weapons used, electronic warfare and tactics of use are important.
  15. 0
    26 October 2023 18: 37
    As an S-300 specialist, I can authoritatively state that the Falcon pilot has nothing to hope for except for the handle under the seat. And there is nothing to talk about about the S-400. Let them try. These thoughts make them pee like boiling water. In the late 80s, I personally accompanied such guys in the Baltic skies. I really wanted to press the red button, but I couldn’t!