Ukraine received Storm Shadow cruise missiles

92
Ukraine received Storm Shadow cruise missiles
Storm Shadow missile in flight configuration


Britain continues to supply the Kyiv regime with modern weapons, which is in service with her own army. The other day officially announced the delivery of a batch of air-launched cruise missiles Storm Shadow. As was the case with other weapons, high hopes are now placed on this product and it is expected that it will affect the course of hostilities. However, the possibility of effective use of foreign ammunition is once again in question.



Waiting for the missiles


Back in November last year, foreign media, citing their own sources, reported that the UK could transfer modern air-launched cruise missiles (ALCMs) of the Storm Shadow type to Ukraine. Rumors also circulated about the possible integration of such missiles into the weapons complex of the Su-24M bomber. Allegedly, such a project was developed and is ready to be implemented in Poland.

In mid-December, the British Minister of Defense Ben Wallace, in another interview for the local media, said that his department did not plan to send Storm Shadow products to Ukraine. At the same time, he did not rule out the transfer of such weapons in the future - if there is a need for them.

A few months later, on May 11, the American news agency CNN again raised the topic of the Storm Shadow ALCM. It learned from unnamed sources that the UK had recently donated several of these missiles to Ukraine. It is assumed that such assistance will improve the strike capabilities of Ukrainian formations and help them fight the Russian army. At the same time, the exact dates and sizes of the transferred batch were not reported.


Rocket in production

Soon there was official confirmation. On the same day, B. Wallace made another speech in the British Parliament about the need to support the Kyiv regime. Among other things, in it he confirmed the fact of sending Storm Shadow missiles to Ukraine. Like CNN, the minister did not go into details and did not disclose the number of missiles transferred, plans for their deployment, etc.

So the UK has given Storm Shadow missiles to Ukraine in recent days or weeks and has also admitted to doing so. Whether these weapons made it to Ukrainian territory and whether the deployment process has begun is unknown. At the same time, the use of British ALCMs has not yet been reported. Perhaps the first attempts at missile strikes of this kind will be made in the very near future.

"Storm Shadow"


History Storm Shadow products date back to the mid-nineties, when the UK and France launched a joint program to develop advanced long-range ALCMs. In the future, the finished rocket received two names at once - the British Storm Shadow and the French SCALP.

Several European and American enterprises participated in the competitive stage of the program. One of the participants in the work was the Anglo-British consortium of British Aerospace and Matra, on the basis of which the modern company MBDA was subsequently formed. His project was considered the most successful by the customers, and in February 1997 a contract appeared for full development and testing.


RAF Tornado strike aircraft with Storm Shadow missiles (under the bottom)

Tests of the finished Storm Shadow / SCALP missile began at the turn of the decade and took several years. By the middle of the XNUMXs, the product fully confirmed the design characteristics and was adopted by the tactical aviation UK and France. By this time, the newly organized MBDA had begun mass production of missiles.

As early as 1997, France placed a pre-order for 500 SCALP missiles. British needs for such weapons at that time were estimated at 800-1000 units, and some of them were soon covered by the first order. Apparently, the first orders of the developing countries were fully completed already in the XNUMXs. In the future, the troops could receive additional batches of weapons to replace used missiles.

Since the late nineties, Storm Shadow has been purchased by third countries. Greece, Egypt, India, Italy, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia received such weapons in varying quantities. Now Ukraine has entered the circle of owners of such ALCMs.

The combat use of Storm Shadow began even before the official adoption. Such missiles were used by the British Air Force during the intervention in Iraq in 2003. Subsequently, British and French aircraft used them in Libya, Syria and Iraq. It was officially reported about the successful defeat of various ground and underground structures.


Italian Typhoon with Anglo-French missiles

In the middle of the XNUMXs, a modification of the Storm Shadow rocket was created under the designation MdCN. It is intended for surface ships and submarines, which is why it has some technical differences, is equipped with a starting engine and is delivered in a sealed container.

Technical features


The manufacturing organization positions the Storm Shadow as a low-observable, long-range cruise missile compatible with a wide range of airborne platforms. Fairly high performance is declared, although there are certain limitations in the case of the export version.

The missile is built in a composite fuselage with a characteristic multifaceted shape, which reduces visibility for radar equipment. There is a high-swept wing, folded in the transport position. The tail has a set of stabilizers and rudders. The total length of the product is 5,1 m, the wingspan is 3 m. The launch weight is 1300 kg.

The rocket uses a small-sized turbojet engine Microturbo TRI 60-30. With its help, speeds up to 1000 km / h are achieved. With a flight altitude of no more than 30-50 m, the rocket in the original version has a range of up to 560 km. The range of the export option to comply with international agreements is limited to 250 km.


Storm Shadow is equipped with a combined guidance system, which is claimed to be highly resistant to interference. The system includes satellite and inertial navigation devices, as well as TERCOM tools that compare the radar appearance of the underlying surface with a route map. In the final leg of the flight, an infrared seeker is used. Information about the route and target is loaded into the missile's memory prior to launch or prior to the sortie of the carrier aircraft. In recent upgrades, it became possible to communicate with the carrier after launch, for example, to retarget or clarify target designation.

The SCALP/Storm Shadow is equipped with a 450 kg high-explosive penetrating warhead of the BROACH type. To break through the protection of the target, a shaped charge is used, followed by the main warhead of a large mass.

Storm Shadow cruise missiles are compatible with a variety of carrier aircraft built to NATO standards. The British RAF use them with Panavia Tornado strike aircraft and Eurofighter Typhoon fighters. In France, the missiles entered the ammunition load of the Dassault Mirage 2000 and Rafale fighter-bombers. The possibility of integrating ALCMs into the ammunition load of other aircraft is not ruled out.

Weak spots


In general, the Storm Shadow missile is a modern aviation weapon and is capable of solving assigned tasks and destroying various ground targets with sufficient efficiency. Its advantages have already been demonstrated in practice, albeit under specific conditions. Often such ALCMs were used in the absence of any opposition from the enemy.


SCALP missile under the bottom of a Dassault Rafale aircraft

The strengths of "Storm Shadow" are high flight performance, primarily flight range, anti-jamming combined guidance system and a fairly heavy warhead. At the same time, the product differs in weight perfection and has a limited mass, which allows it to be used by tactical aircraft.

It is quite understandable why the Kiev regime is interested in obtaining such weapons. However, in his case, there are a number of objective factors that, at the very least, will seriously impede the operation and combat use of imported missiles. As a result, the effectiveness of such weapons will not live up to expectations - if they can be used at all.

First of all, problems with finding media are expected. Earlier it was reported that the British ALCM could be used by modified Su-24M bombers. Such aircraft are fairly easy targets for Russian air defense and fighter aircraft. Accordingly, the use of imported missiles can be stopped already at the stage of the launch vehicle flight to the launch line. The defeat of a bomber after a missile drop will also have a negative impact on the state of the Ukrainian Air Force fleet and the prospects for the use of aviation weapons.

There are currently no other air platforms for Storm Shadow in Ukraine and are not yet expected. There are no compatible ships either. Perhaps an attempt will be made to create some kind of improvised ground launcher. However, such an "ersatz" will create additional problems and limitations.


According to the manufacturer, the Storm Shadow missile is stealthy, due to which it should break through air defense. However, this has not been verified in practice. For example, in April 2018, the British and French Air Force and Navy attacked an object in Syria using Storm Shadow, SCALP and MdCN missiles. The Syrian air defense, armed with Russian-made systems and complexes, successfully repelled the raid and shot down all the ammunition.

Shortly thereafter, the Russian Ministry of Defense demonstrated the wreckage of downed missiles. Obviously, the fragments have been carefully studied, and our designers of air defense systems have drawn the necessary conclusions. Accordingly, the capabilities of Russian air defense systems and air defense systems to combat European missiles have improved.

Free advertising


Thus, foreign partners-patrons again provided the Kyiv regime with a “miracle weapon” designed to change the situation on the fronts and turn the tide of hostilities. However, the constant and systematic actions of the Russian army to demilitarize Ukraine have led to the fact that the use of new British missiles will be at least difficult. In this case, any attempt to use them will be stopped.

However, the Kiev regime will definitely try to use the received Storm Shadow, ignoring all the risks and restrictions. From this episode or episodes, regardless of their results, they will again try to create a sensation and “overcome”, but this will not help the current Ukrainian authorities. The only beneficiary in this situation will be the company MBDA, whose products will receive free advertising - albeit of a dubious nature.
92 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +28
    13 May 2023 04: 08
    The rocket is extremely dangerous. And although yesterday's successful attack on Lugansk, according to recent reports, is still not Storm Shadow (alas, Bandera now has a wide selection of high-precision weapons), but if they adapt it to the Su-24, there will be many problems. Even more if they get the F-16. All major rear bases and cities, the Kerch bridge, and fleet bases will be under threat.
    Countermeasures? With the current political component - NWO in order to negotiate with partners, there are few countermeasures that can be devised. Only work on carriers before launching and attacking airfields.
    1. +12
      13 May 2023 05: 37
      Countermeasures? Yes, to tear pipes from Norway and to England and Poland, along with gas, spirit is needed and that's all. And then you can yell loudly that the British, by their natural nature, rushed themselves.
      1. +9
        13 May 2023 06: 14
        The main countermeasure is the destruction of the military-political leadership of Ukraine, it has always been like this, I don’t know what kind of promises and to whom our leadership gave there, for me it is only responsible to the people of Russia and there is nothing to breed politeness with concern. The saying "winners are not judged" is still relevant today.
        1. +5
          13 May 2023 10: 02
          The main countermeasure is the destruction of the military-political leadership of Ukraine
          Yes, why are you so rude to respected Kyiv partners, you can’t touch them, but they gave guarantees, as the Prime Minister of Israel said, and no one refuted his words. And the author writes that it was not Storm Shadow that hit, but only what then: because, as they wrote under the news flight in the comments, you can look and see that the launch was carried out from an aircraft over Kramorsk. And made very high quality two missiles to hit the target, and a missile to suppress air defense. Apparently, it will soon be necessary to hide all objects for another 200-300 km, if this missile proves its effectiveness.
      2. +9
        13 May 2023 06: 40
        Yes, to tear pipes from Norway and to England and Poland, along with gas, spirit is needed and that's all.

        Well, go ahead and rip. See, the authorities don't want to?
        1. -1
          13 May 2023 09: 55
          I’m not the marine infantry they need, they have a beautiful passion uniform with a dagger, oh, let them rush with a dagger.
      3. +12
        13 May 2023 07: 59
        Do you really think that after the explosion of pipes, the supply of weapons to Ukraine will stop?????? And suddenly on the contrary - will intensify? Have you considered this option?
        1. -5
          13 May 2023 09: 57
          You know, the fact is that there are deliveries with whole pipes, but goodbye to the pipe and gas, you already need to think about it, and the electric cables in the strait are also good.
          1. +3
            13 May 2023 21: 15
            Quote: saigon
            You know, the fact is that there are deliveries with whole pipes, but goodbye to the pipe and gas, you already need to think about it, and the electric cables in the strait are also good.

            And who will calmly undermine it?
            Or do they not have any anti-sabotage forces? Or do they not control the exits of our ships and submarines from our bases?
            Or do they not have spies in the amount of every second in our Armed Forces and every one and a half in our General Staff?
            1. +6
              14 May 2023 15: 21
              And they have a fleet, and rather big. And the Norwegians, too, and the Swedes. And they are quite capable of controlling their waters. As well as sinking tankers with our oil in response to undermining their pipes.
              But people with kindergarten thinking are unable to understand this - for them to undermine it is to press the button.
        2. +6
          13 May 2023 12: 49
          Quote: Roman Efremov
          Do you really think that after the explosion of pipes, the supply of weapons to Ukraine will stop??????
          Yes, "A" and "B" were sitting on the pipe ... If we ourselves continue to pay money for transit to the Bandera-Nazi "partners", what is there to talk about, nothing personal, this is loot, the immense greed of our oligarchs, who are spinning the CBO . Everyone is waiting for an agreement, because there is no end in sight to this war. Our arsenals are emptying, and the West is starting to promote aid to Nazi Ukraine. How to win, with the bourgeoisie? Most likely, as after the first Chechen one, we will wait for the new Khasavyurt ... It seems that for our victory, the DPR and LPR need another people's republic - Russia itself, with people's power, and not the power of the oligarchs, who would have resources for loot and Hitler sold and glued agreements.
          1. +3
            13 May 2023 19: 51
            Why did you write all this nonsense? And don't be lazy!
            I asked the question: will an attack on Britain stop the supply of weapons, or only increase? The same with Poland - will an attack on it force the Polish army to join the Ukrainian one?
            1. 0
              14 May 2023 16: 41
              Quote: Roman Efremov
              Why did you write all this nonsense?

              Then, Roman, that the sabotage of blowing up pipes does not solve anything for us, the main thing is that none of the Russian leadership will dare to do this.

              About "nonsense", it's a pity that you only see this. Russia's problem is that we are sitting under the oligarchs who are sitting under the West. The same Abramovich thought more about his billions, which were unfrozen after the surrender of Kherson, and participated in the export of scumbags from Azov to Turkey. At one time, the interests of Akhmetov, our Severstal and Vnesheconombank did not give us the opportunity to take open Mariupol.
              The whole problem of the NWO is in the dependence and selfish interests of the Russian and Ukrainian rich.

              Most importantly, the problem could and should have been solved in 2014, when we had superior forces and international law was on our side, when Yanukovych officially asked for help, after the anti-constitutional coup d'etat in Kiev. This appeal was recorded in the UN, Putin was delegated all the powers. But what happened happened.
              The selfish interests of the oligarchs outweighed everything, we did not recognize the referendums in the Donbass, but they recognized the "elections" from the Bandera junta, as a result, Yanukovych lost legitimacy, and the Bandera people were legalized. As a result, Crimea became an annexation, Russia received sanctions. To this, they surrendered the "Russian Spring", the entire south-east of Ukraine, was waiting for help from Russia. So we chewed snot for 8 years, and - the NWO was born, with a smeared "preventive strike", a mediocre campaign against Kyiv ... So we also became "aggressors". If you do not want to understand this, if this is "nonsense" for you, you can continue to ask whether the supply of weapons to Ukraine will stop or not.
              All the best, consider that I was "not too lazy" again.
            2. +3
              15 May 2023 17: 45
              "... With Poland - will an attack on it force the Polish army to join the Ukrainian one?"
              No, it won't. Such an attack will force NATO to enter the conflict already in full (and not in Simonyanovsky-Solovevsky-Skabeev sobs and twisting legs).
      4. +2
        13 May 2023 11: 30
        Quote: saigon
        Countermeasures? Yes, to tear pipes from Norway and to England and Poland, along with gas, spirit is needed and that’s all

        This is wonderful and I agree with this, as well as with the respected Silver99 about the leadership of Bandera Ukraine, but, alas, this simply will not happen. With the current political component - NWO in order to agree with partners, So I didn't even consider all those options.
        Meanwhile, in the morning they again declared that it was Storm Shadow (last night they claimed that it was OTRK Thunder). And again in the morning another arrival. The variety of weapons with which they can now attack the rear zone is also impressive, in addition to Storm Shadow and the semi-mythical Thunder, these are GLSDB planning bombs., And GMLRS M31 long-range missiles under the Chimera.
        1. 0
          15 May 2023 01: 45
          Quote: Belisarius
          With the current political component - NWO in order to negotiate with partners

          Well, if you do NVO, without the goal of "negotiating with partners", then this is already a nuclear war of mutual destruction. And neither Putin nor the rest of the elite wants this. Something tells them the thought, they don’t want to “die”. People who want to "gouge everyone and die themselves" write here, but not everyone in Russia wants to die. Especially the "upper comrades". They need victory, not their own destruction.
          1. -2
            15 May 2023 23: 50
            Quote: onstar9
            Well, if you do NWO, without the goal of "negotiating with partners", then this is already a nuclear war of mutual destruction.

            I don’t remember something in Putin’s words about the reasons for the SVO a year ago, the use of nuclear weapons. It seems like demilitarization and denazification were goals, but not nuclear weapons. Anyone who talks about the use of nuclear weapons, all the more demanding, in my opinion, or does not understand what he is talking about, and if he understands, he hates Russia and Russians in the first place, I'm not talking about people in general who could suffer, millions of mostly peaceful of people. For the Russian Federation is not the USSR, but NATO of the 80s, not NATO of the 21st century, some were blown away, others, on the contrary, pouted, created a powerful missile defense system and made a bunch of modern delivery vehicles for all kinds of warheads. This, by the way, is about possible exchanges of blows, the exchange will hardly be in favor of the Russian Federation. But there is another important thing. In the eyes of the whole world (today, judging by the UN vote, almost, and after nuclear weapons, all without exception), Russia will not only be an aggressor that unleashed a war for the sake of territories, which will be forgotten as much as possible in decades, but also a global evil that unleashed a nuclear war and this will put an end to Russia for centuries. Already, the price in historical terms is huge, but it will be generally exorbitant. I do not understand the motivation of those who demand the use of nuclear weapons? For what? Where to hit? By Kyiv? And the APU will surrender? Enough that Putin and Medvedev are talking about this, there is no need to procrastinate this topic even more.
      5. +2
        14 May 2023 02: 01
        Are you aware that attacking that pipes would trigger open war between NATO and Russia?
    2. 0
      13 May 2023 07: 36
      Quote: Belisarius
      Countermeasures?

      The imperturbable Peskov has already commented. He said that our military would have to respond adequately. But how exactly - mysteriously kept silent. Apparently in order to keep the intrigue and keep the English partners in suspense!

      In my understanding, "adequately" is when for every English missile that flew into Russian territory they should hit the UK with a Russian missile. But the understanding of the adequacy of Peskov is probably different.
      1. +4
        13 May 2023 10: 11
        Peskov commented, and then again a fresh blow to Lugansk, the enemy began to knock out the rear areas.
    3. old
      +3
      13 May 2023 07: 41
      The biggest problem is not even in the rocket, but in what will be put after it: F-16 or nuclear weapons right away? And if there are only concerns again, then there is no doubt about the deliveries.
      1. +8
        13 May 2023 09: 22
        Enough with these nuclear weapons. Nobody will give Ukraine. NATO countries cannot use the bombs that are on their territory at will, and your leaders continue to talk about how nuclear weapons will be transferred to Ukraine. No sane person wants a nuclear war. And no one in the West talks about this.
        1. +2
          13 May 2023 11: 53
          Quote: stoqn477
          Enough with these nuclear weapons. Nobody will give Ukraine

          And why give Ukraine nuclear weapons, if the usual ones "were not even started"? Even outdated?
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +1
      13 May 2023 11: 28
      Something I rarely meet you lately, but here I was the first to be noted on an insignificant occasion.
    6. 0
      13 May 2023 18: 22
      How did the couch analysts get it who constantly say it's not dangerous, the generals already know everything and the Kremlin already has a secret brilliant plan. We didn't even start and stuff. Wake up people, we didn’t even take bakhmut for six months. And today, the DRG shot down two of our helicopters and 2 planes.
  2. -13
    13 May 2023 04: 37
    Russia will have to use combat aircraft and helicopters to stop the offensive, otherwise a DISASTER will follow soon. This time, aviation and a fleet of combat helicopters must be DECISIVELY involved. At the same time, all those who leave their posts must be transferred to the PENALTIES. That's what the Chechens could take care of.

    As for the head of the Russian Army, if a catastrophe happens and he is not going to die at the front; then in order to save your honor - it remains only to SHIELD. crying
    1. +11
      13 May 2023 06: 49
      Sulla__Glorious (Sulla Glorious)Today, 04:37
      What you wrote has something to do with the missiles that Britain supplied? Text that is not related to the discussion is called flooding. Judging by your comments, "throw on the fan" is your main goal.
  3. +11
    13 May 2023 05: 23
    Yes..
    "Pies" for the Armed Forces only have time to bake. And ... very good conditions in Ukraine for running in weapons of the Western military-industrial complex. In short, deliveries will increase exponentially.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. +3
    13 May 2023 05: 41
    RAF Tornado strike aircraft with Storm Shadow missiles (under the bottom) laughing
    Maybe, after the failure in Syria, they also drew conclusions?
  5. +9
    13 May 2023 05: 56
    While the snot is being thoroughly chewed, we are not in a position to oppose anything to the buildup of arms by Bandera.
  6. +7
    13 May 2023 06: 07
    It still surprises me why Russia does not want to destroy statehood in Ukraine? The very statehood in which Russophobia is going wild, which chose the methods of Nazi Germany ...
    Maybe someone has experience or information about how trade and economic relations are maintained with the territory where there are NO GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES? Why are the Russian authorities still hanging around with this group of half-witted clowns who "they don't know what they want"?
    * * *
    The supply of such weapons was predictable. The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have means of combating such missiles, but the very fact of meanness remains, when the GB, cursed for all ages, continues its vile policy, continues to spoil quietly and even through someone else's ass ...
    Russia - a power, or a piece of territory appropriated by thieves? Excuse me, newly-minted gentlemen, does this behavior disgust you? Aren't you sick of these Anglo-Saxon dishes? It probably makes sense to reserve the right to use such missiles on the territory of the GB itself ... And how else can you bring down this arrogance? Tell! Share with the people who put you in power (or did you yourself appoint yourself rulers of the Russian land?), How would you like to keep the answer?
    1. +11
      13 May 2023 07: 29
      Before whom to keep the answer, before the feed? They are not the rulers, the operators of the milking machines and the regulators of the personalization of the margin takers. According to the principle, their first level is gas and oil, the second level is fines, a construction complex, etc., etc. Watchers.
      And CR is serious. And who said that the impudent Saxons would not supply such with a maximum range? What are the international restrictions now when TMwobla is gaining momentum?
    2. -2
      13 May 2023 07: 44
      In Ukraine, many Russian oligarchs have property and transit routes for oil, gas, ammonia through Ukraine.
      Property under capitalism is sacred and inviolable like the Holy Grail.
      And the blood of people who die at the fronts for this property of the oligarchs is cheaper than the wine that these moneybags of the Russian Federation drink.
    3. 0
      13 May 2023 08: 01
      Quote: ROSS 42
      It still surprises me why in Russia do not want to destroy the state in Ukraine?

      There will be no one to sign the surrender!

      For some reason, they believe that peace negotiations are needed precisely for the signing of surrender and nothing else. This is what they tell us when they answer the question: Why does our country need peace talks?
      1. -1
        13 May 2023 08: 05
        With such a victorious move by the NWO, even in Moscow there will be no one to sign capitulation with - everyone will be swept away by the new year 1917, when Russia will get tired of the unpromising NWO.
        1. +1
          13 May 2023 11: 26
          Quote: AlexKruglov1976
          Moscow will not sign capitulation with anyone - everyone will be swept away by the new 1917,

          In Brest-Litovsk, they signed normally.
          1. -2
            13 May 2023 19: 40
            That's it: with such a leadership of the NWO, Russia can really only sign a new Brest peace.
          2. +2
            13 May 2023 20: 50
            What didn't need to be signed? Was it necessary to lose the state? They signed, raked, overcame the devastation, strangled the counter and built a powerful industrial state, which eventually created its own policy on the planet, in defiance of those with whom they signed.
            1. -2
              13 May 2023 21: 47
              Quote: Essex62
              Was it necessary to lose the state? Signed, raked, overcame devastation, strangled counter

              )))
              Let me remind you that the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was signed with the Petrograd rebels, and the territories that they "ceded" at that time were controlled either by the Russian government, or by the separatists, or by the Germans themselves.
              1. +2
                14 May 2023 02: 23
                Which government of Russia? Is it the one in the dress that rushed on the run from the wrath of the people? No, good sir, not a rebellion, but the Great October Socialist Revolution. Forever changed the world, putting at the forefront the one with the bipod. And the one with a spoon to the nail.
                But the rebellion, the counter-revolutionary coup, just happened in 93. Having brought Russia down into the abyss and darkness of inhuman capitalism.
                1. 0
                  14 May 2023 12: 00
                  Quote: Essex62
                  Which government of Russia?

                  As of March 18, mostly Kornilov.
                  Quote: Essex62
                  Is it the one in the dress that rushed on the run from the wrath of the people?

                  Are you talking about Kerensky? There was no popular anger, there was a conditional Yavlinsky, who decided to play Cromwell and played too much.
                  Quote: Essex62
                  Forever changed the world, putting at the forefront the one with the bipod.

                  )))
                  You overestimate these events. By the way, in my opinion, the activities of the Bolsheviks were of a counter-revolutionary nature: the rejection of the republic, the restoration of autocracy. Yes, with different personalities, rhetoric and very exotic secondary details, but at the root it was precisely a return to the political practices of the old regime, and not a rejection of them.
                  1. 0
                    14 May 2023 14: 57
                    And this is how many rotten anti-Soviet anti-Soviet people see it. I heard enough of these tales during the period of "perestroika" and especially after the counter-revolutionary coup. An attempt to bring such heresy to my mind always ended in tears for the person who, in the literal sense, voiced it.
                    What autocracy? Where? Transfer of power by birthright? And the rejection of the bourgeois republic. The Bolsheviks created their own, which has no analogues in history. It has nothing to do with previous practices. First of all, because a hard worker and not a drone, a nobleman or a rich merchant, stood at the forefront. And equality, equality. No caste differences.
                  2. 0
                    16 May 2023 15: 41
                    Quote: Essex62
                    Which government of Russia?
                    As of March 18, mostly Kornilov.

                    Was there ever a Kornilov government in Russia? something new...
      2. The comment was deleted.
  7. +1
    13 May 2023 06: 13
    Storm Shadow missiles

    Weapons are expensive ... therefore, it is obvious that they will strike at the most important objects of our Armed Forces or industrial infrastructure.
    Let's see where they go. what
    1. 0
      13 May 2023 08: 08
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      Let's see where they go

      Yes, it would be better not to bring it to this.
  8. +3
    13 May 2023 06: 14
    They themselves are to blame for the buildup of weapons. It was necessary to hollow from the first day everything and everyone. Slowly started - a mistake. Analysts in the Moscow Region have completely screwed up.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      13 May 2023 14: 20
      Yes, if only the analysts in the Moscow Region had burst to the fullest, otherwise ...!
  9. -5
    13 May 2023 06: 26
    Eh, this would be yes in the Tower, or right in the office of the big-eared prime minister.
  10. +10
    13 May 2023 06: 31
    strangely enthusiastic article)) first, a modern missile with a long range, inconspicuous, noise-proof, and at the end. but all the same, she’s shit and she’ll have nothing to start from at all, she’ll be raschika on a delivery))) I think the appropriate letaki will be provided to her, of course, not by the United States, but let’s say by Portugal, because the latter is a small country in itself, and if eurofighters come from it it won’t cause a new round of escalation ((although it will definitely prolong the agony of the Kiev regime
    1. AUL
      +8
      13 May 2023 10: 56
      Quote from Mazunga
      strangely enthusiastic article)) first, a modern missile with a long range, inconspicuous, noise-proof, and at the end. but all the same, she is shit and she generally has nothing to start from, she will be slacking off on a delivery)))

      Well, who is the author? Kirill Ryabov! He has all the articles on similar topics according to this scheme. So as not to panic, I guess. wink
  11. +3
    13 May 2023 07: 39
    As for the Ukrainians, a charge in the FAB-500, and for us 300 kg of explosives in the "Stormshadow" warhead
    won't like it.
  12. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      13 May 2023 11: 51
      I think the "towers" will receive shameful slaps in the face (as with a drone that blew up the flag on the dome of the BKD), but without victims, so that they continue to sleep peacefully ... the situation is twofold with elections - electronic voting makes it possible to get the desired result, and the vcium will come up with all the stops " 80% support"... so the revolution will not happen, everything is going according to the scenario planned by the United States!
  13. +4
    13 May 2023 07: 55
    I believe Ryabov and I am sure that, as he says, the rocket will not fly or it will be 100% guaranteed to be destroyed, there are no carrier aircraft, or if there is, we will destroy it, and in general everything is in order, everything is going according to plan
  14. +1
    13 May 2023 07: 58
    Quote: AlexKruglov1976
    They are only testing NATO weapons on our guys - coffins are coming to the Russian Federation from Ukraine.
    And one day the patience of the Russian people with this SVOLochny situation will burst like in 1917, since there is no victory even on the horizon.
    Either the top political leadership of the Russian Federation has completely turned its brains into fat from old age, or they specifically want this.

    Not in fat, but in jelly.
  15. +7
    13 May 2023 08: 20
    "However, the possibility of effective use of foreign ammunition is once again in question."Again? How something comes to / into Ukraine, so the use is in question, and when they start shooting at us from this, red lines appear that cannot be crossed, so we will arrange for them! Another blah blah blah.
  16. -12
    13 May 2023 09: 18
    Oh well. You can only carry Su-24s, and then, if they are upgraded for it, will they even remain on the outskirts? You can’t attach them to an attack aircraft anymore ...
    They will shoot down both a rocket and a bomber in the very first sortie, they can be seen far away, and as a target they are nothing special. Not a prodigy, in short
    1. +5
      13 May 2023 11: 21
      She successfully struck a plant in Lugansk yesterday.
      https://t.me/milinfolive/100582
  17. +5
    13 May 2023 09: 44
    The rocket uses a small-sized turbojet engine Microturbo TRI 60-30. It achieves speed to 1000 m / s

    Trim the sturgeon. Mach 3 on a 5.7 kN engine?
  18. -10
    13 May 2023 10: 04
    One way or another, but once again everything depends on the amount of ammunition supplied. 2-3 missiles will not change anything, because the capabilities of conventional weapons are seriously limited, so it is likely that with a single launch of less than 30-40 missiles, most of ours will be shot down, and the past damage will be minimal. In the case of mass deliveries, any missiles are dangerous, since not a single air defense system can give a 100% guarantee of interception.
    1. +8
      13 May 2023 11: 54
      once again rests on the amount of ammunition supplied. 2-3 rockets won't change anything,

      please stop these soothing mantras, they also said that about tanks - and the Ukrainians already have 500 Western tanks, a bunch of Hymers, planes will go soon!
      1. -1
        13 May 2023 21: 44
        Quote: Vladimir80
        and the Ukrainians already have 500 Western tanks

        Basically talking about the T-72. Western tanks of new types (that is, with a 120mm gun) are several dozen, taking into account all the promised ones - about a hundred.
  19. +14
    13 May 2023 10: 06
    I kept thinking when cruise missiles would appear in the "little, late, useless" cycle.

    Here they are.
  20. +8
    13 May 2023 11: 34
    "Kyiv used Storm Shadow cruise missiles for the first time during the shelling of Lugansk" News of the hour on Vzglyad. Another crazy article about the difficulties of application. The author would have deleted all this and would not have been dishonored, and he would have stopped writing.
    1. -1
      13 May 2023 11: 51
      Quote: Alexey 1970
      "Kyiv used Storm Shadow cruise missiles for the first time during the shelling of Lugansk"

      It is unlikely. From Luhansk to Bakhmut 150 km, the Armed Forces of Ukraine already have the means for such a range.
      1. +1
        13 May 2023 14: 04
        This has already been confirmed by photographic facts ...
        1. -1
          13 May 2023 21: 42
          Quote: Nikolay310
          confirmed by photo facts

          The Russian Federation reliably has fragments of these missiles from Syria. So the photo facts of Izvestia and RIA Novosti do not matter.

          However, this is a secondary issue. Shadow so Shadow.
  21. +12
    13 May 2023 13: 54
    Quote: Ryabov Kirill
    However, the constant and systematic actions of the Russian army to demilitarize Ukraine have led to the fact that the use of new British missiles will be at least difficult. In this case, any attempt to use them will be stopped.

    fool
    Ryabov? Ryabov!
    RN sang the same mantras about MANPADS, ATGMs, artillery, himars, drones, air defense systems, tanks ..
    Waiting for the F-16 and its uselessness in the steppes of Ukraine
    1. +7
      13 May 2023 15: 56
      And also about the uselessness of all NATO weapons, and which, for some reason, shoots, also shoots down.
  22. +5
    13 May 2023 14: 03
    Has it already come that very Okhranotsky "time is working for Russia"? Or do you have to be patient??
  23. +6
    13 May 2023 16: 40
    Thus, foreign partners-patrons again provided the Kyiv regime with a “miracle weapon” designed to change the situation on the fronts and turn the tide of hostilities. However, the constant and systematic actions of the Russian army to demilitarize Ukraine have led to the fact that the use of new British missiles will be at least difficult. In this case, any attempt to use them will be stopped.

    Ryabov analytics level:Prophet laughing Best regards
    1. +5
      13 May 2023 18: 34
      Well, he hadn’t done it so fluidly yet, on the day the article was published, a refutation by action. I've been saying for a long time, it is necessary to stop graphomaniac attempts.
  24. -6
    13 May 2023 17: 58
    Argentina should be helped to return the islands.
    1. +5
      13 May 2023 22: 13
      Quote from Fedot
      Argentina should be helped to return the islands.
      This strange call sounds on the site not for the first time. If you really want help! DO NOT waste your time. What are the problems? winked
  25. +7
    13 May 2023 19: 53
    Quote: Stas157
    Quote: Belisarius
    Countermeasures?

    In my understanding, "adequately" is when for every English missile that flew into Russian territory they should hit the UK with a Russian missile. But the understanding of the adequacy of Peskov is probably different.

    That is, Ukraine alone is not enough for us - will we also start fighting with Britain ??? Brilliant plan!!! You are a genius!
    1. -4
      14 May 2023 14: 19
      No need to go to war with Britain. It is enough to supply Argentina with at least old anti-ship missiles and integrate them into local aviation. If ours had taken care of this in the 82nd Angles, then it would have been possible to click on the nose even then. Painful and practically free.
  26. +4
    13 May 2023 22: 04
    First of all, problems with finding media are expected. Earlier it was reported that the British ALCM could be used by modified Su-24M bombers. Such aircraft are fairly easy targets for Russian air defense and fighter aircraft. Accordingly, the use of imported missiles can be stopped already at the stage of the launch vehicle flight to the launch line. The defeat of the bomber after the missile was dropped will also negatively affect the state of the Ukrainian Air Force fleet and the prospects for the use of aviation weapons.
    So far, the problems are not with the use of this rocket, but with a typical agitprop from the author ...
  27. 0
    14 May 2023 03: 17
    With the surrender of Kherson, we showed that you can do anything with us. And the signal was sent to the allies that it makes no sense to help us. Everything can end in a shameful agreement
  28. 0
    14 May 2023 11: 50
    The range of the export option to comply with international agreements is limited to 250 km.

    Formally, these agreements are not grounds for limiting the range of deliveries to Ukraine - Ukraine, like the UK, is a member of the regime to limit missile technology.
    1. -2
      14 May 2023 13: 58
      Speaking of range.

      Something has not been heard about the MGM-140 for a long time. The appearance in Ukraine of Western cruise missiles of a similar range, about 300 km, allows us to raise this issue again.
      1. +2
        14 May 2023 16: 32
        Oddly enough, it is stated that the supply of Storm Shadow does not change the position on ATAKMS - they are not given yet.
        1. 0
          14 May 2023 20: 30
          Quote: Wildcat
          ATAKMS - they are not given yet.

          Until they give.
  29. 0
    14 May 2023 14: 13
    "The rocket uses a small-sized turbojet engine Microturbo TRI 60-30. With its help, speeds up to 1000 m / s are achieved"

    You write nonsense 1000 m / s is almost three speeds of sound, and the rocket is SUBSONIC, i.e. 300 m/s approx.
  30. 0
    14 May 2023 16: 02
    Well, how is it that "chicken by grain" (c) does not choke on an abundance of grain?
  31. 0
    15 May 2023 15: 58
    As a result, the effectiveness of such weapons will not live up to expectations - if they can be used at all.

    All right, let's go. Ryabov said that it is not effective. For some reason, without the branded "little" and "not on time."
  32. 0
    15 May 2023 16: 00
    Quote from Silver99
    I don’t know what kind of promises and to whom our leadership gave there, for me it is only responsible to the people of Russia

    Something is not noticeable that the "leadership" reports to the "people". Spectacles to organize, it is possible. But modern boyars will not report to the lackeys.
  33. -1
    15 May 2023 16: 04
    Quote: Per se.
    we need another people's republic - Russia itself

    Russian People's Republic! What, I like it. RNR in alliance with the Siberian People's Republic and the Altai People's Republic.... The scenario of the civil war. White, red, green, blue....
  34. 0
    15 May 2023 16: 06
    Quote: stoqn477
    Nobody will give Ukraine.

    Nobody gave Israel either. And to Pakistan, and who gave India? Themselves "take" if it comes to that. I'm sure it won't come, everything will end much earlier.
  35. 0
    15 May 2023 16: 07
    Quote from Senator Om
    And today, the DRG shot down two of our helicopters and 2 planes

    It's not DRG, that's for sure. Maybe an air defense system from an ambush, or maybe a couple of planes from an ambush. But definitely not DRG.
  36. 0
    15 May 2023 16: 10
    Quote: ROSS 42
    but the very fact of meanness remains

    Why is the supply of arms a cavity in your opinion? Is the supply of weapons to Egypt and Syria from the USSR also a meanness? And Vietnam? And Cuba?
  37. -1
    15 May 2023 19: 44
    Announce that we no longer recognize as British and consider as occupied Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, Montserrat, Pitcairn Islands, Saint Helena, Ascension, Tristan da Cunha, Turks and Caicos Islands, British territory in the Indian Ocean, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, Akrotiri and Dhekelia, and of course Northern Ireland. To declare that we will give whatever support we deem necessary to those forces that will fight for their liberation from British occupation. (In no case should you name these forces, for example, the IRA, they themselves will think of everything as it should, but without confirmation from our side)
  38. 0
    15 May 2023 20: 09
    Will our rulers be swallowed again? (((Personally, I am ashamed of them and the country, and also shameful! Hey, Guarantor, where are you hiding? Get out! It's time to work !!! , bullying...
  39. 0
    15 May 2023 20: 27
    The author made a mistake with the speed of the rocket, not 1000 m / s, but 1000 km per hour, the speed of this product.