Pele project: a reactor that is always with you

14
Pele project: a reactor that is always with you
The gloomy future of Pele mini-nuclear power plant. Source: pipedot.org


The perfect gadget


The idea to tame a nuclear reactor for military purposes and make it no more than a field technical equipment has been in the minds of engineers for a very long time.



The first were Soviet designers with a caterpillar nuclear power plant TES-3 back in the late 50s. It cannot be called compact - the nuclear reactor with infrastructure was placed on four chassis of heavy tanks. The station worked flawlessly, had a long service life and could well supply electricity and heat to a remote garrison. But the dimensions and exorbitant weight of TPP-3 did not allow further improvement of the design.

At a new level, the concept of a mobile nuclear station was continued in the early 80s, when the Soviet industry offered the Pamir-630D product to the series. If TPP-3 was made according to the classical scheme of a pressurized water reactor, then at Pamir the coolant was the Nitrin compound based on dinitrogen tetroxide. This made it possible to reduce the dimensions of the reactor and raise the temperature at the outlet of the hot zone to 500 degrees Celsius. The station was placed on two heavy trawls, the tractors of which were Belarusian MAZs in a special design. Unlike TES-3, a pair of semi-trailers could move along public roads and quite decent off-road.

It just turned out as a result of a real explosive mixture on wheels. Not only was there almost twenty kilograms of highly enriched uranium dioxide in the reactor, but also the coolant turned out to be surprisingly toxic. It is alleged that during the run-in of the working processes of the reactor, one of the developers was poisoned by Nitrin to death. After the Chernobyl accident, the project was closed, and since then nothing has been heard about domestic projects of mobile nuclear reactors.

But the idea of ​​power supply for separated military garrisons from small-sized nuclear power plants was not abandoned. Especially in light of the development of the Northern Sea Route.

In the United States, the first experiences with mobile stations date back to the early 60s. It was the ML-1 Mobile Power System that was to revolutionize the industry.

First, to reduce the size, the engineers took a big risk and pumped the reactor with nitrogen. In theory, it was supposed to play the role of a coolant, and in which case its reserves could be quickly replenished from the surrounding air. But the gas cooling of the hot zone of the reactor required non-trivial solutions for sealing the circuit. The Americans were never able to solve this problem - the gas was leaking from the pipelines, and even carried a lot of radioactive particles with it.

The second unique feature of the ML-1 was its air transportability - it was the first in stories precedent of this kind. The station was placed in four standard containers and airlifted to the S-130.

As is already clear, the revolution did not happen - the design turned out to be so crude that it did not even come to trial operation in the troops.

Project Pele


The Americans use the Advanced Medium Mobile Power Source complex as the main mobile energy source, which includes five multi-fuel electric generators with a capacity of 2,5 kW to 2,5 MW. The developers claim that in comparison with their predecessors, withdrawn from service in 2011, generators are 21 percent more economical, as well as more reliable and safer.

However, the laws of physics and chemistry cannot be deceived - garrisons for power plants have to continuously supply fuel and consumables. This is, firstly, troublesome, and secondly, it increases the vulnerability of any isolated US base from attacks. It is worth blocking the caravans with fuel, and the vaunted American technology will not last long. The number of military bases in the American army has exceeded eight hundred, which creates huge problems with the delivery of fuel.

At the same time, the Pentagon is constantly increasing the number of electricity consumers in the army. The Americans plan to transfer light wheeled vehicles to electric traction in 25–30 years. And in the future, this trend is planned to be extended to all armored vehicles, up to tanks. At the same time, the United States is dreaming of laser missile defense and a bunch of gadgets that multiply the need for electricity. Therefore, if the project of a small-sized nuclear power plant for military purposes did not exist, it would have to be invented.

And the Americans are feeding taxpayers a story about reducing the notorious "carbon footprint" from military infrastructure. According to the Pentagon, in 2020 alone, the Army "used up nearly 78 million barrels of fuel to power ships, aircraft, combat vehicles and reserve bases, totaling $9,2 billion."

It seems to be an impressive figure, which nevertheless seems insignificant against the background of the Pentagon's $750 billion defense budget. And against the background of the emissions that annually deliver into the atmosphere of the United States, the share of the military barely reaches a couple of percent. Researchers have calculated that over the past three years, the US military has emitted more than fifty million tons of carbon dioxide every twelve months. Most of the world's countries are not capable, in principle, of generating such a mass of greenhouse gases.


This is what Pele might look like. Source: atomic-energy.ru

The answer to all the above questions, the Americans considered the project of a small-sized nuclear reactor of the fourth generation named Pele.

The development program started in March 2022 and should culminate for the Americans in the creation of a serial small-sized nuclear power plant with a capacity of 1 to 5 MW. At the same time, it is planned to load nuclear fuel into the reactor no more than once every three years. Interestingly, Pele should be the first generation IV reactor in the United States.

For the second time in history, the Pentagon is trying to revolutionize nuclear power - ML-1 sixty years ago was also based on untested solutions. The first prototype is planned to be created at the National Laboratory in Idaho. Generation IV NPP is a broad concept that includes several different schemes that differ both in the type of cooling and in the fuel used. The Americans for Pele chose gas cooling (hello from nitrogen ML-1) and a very specific fuel - TRISO (tristructural-isotropic).


Triso tablets. Source: www.naukatehnika.com

A ball of uranium dioxide with a diameter of 0,5 mm is wrapped in a graphite shell, followed by a layer of pyrographite, silicon carbide, and on top everything is covered with another pyrographite shell. Graphite surrounding the dioxide core is responsible for holding the fission products. Otherwise, Pele is a typical reactor - fuel is loaded into the rods, and the heat from the hot zone is transferred to the steam generator by an as yet unnamed gas. It can be helium, nitrogen, or even hydrogen - for more than half a century, Americans have learned how to build sealed and durable pipelines for any coolant.

The lead developer of the compact nuclear power plant is BWX Technologies, which makes money on the supply of nuclear fuel. The contract for the construction of the Pele prototype was signed last year and implies $300 million for this purpose. The finished product is expected by 2024. BWX began production of the “three-layer” TRISO fuel adapted for the new reactor in December 2022.


At BWX Technologies' facility in Lynchburg, Virginia. Source: atomic-energy.ru

Despite the declared safety of Pele, the Americans are well aware that in the event of even a local turmoil, a mini-nuclear power plant cannot survive even a few days. The death of even the most ultra-modern nuclear power plant from a banal mine or projectile will make the nearby territory unusable for a long time. As well as surrounding soldiers. Therefore, the Pentagon proposes to use Pele so far only on island bases and in the Arctic. In the event of a collapse, the death of several nuclear power plants, continental America will easily survive. The same cannot be said about potential adversaries.

The Pele program indirectly signals that the Americans intend to create significant competition for Russia for control of the Northern Sea Route. Mini-nuclear power plants are a tool for building up forces in the north and increasing the autonomy of individual units. And everyone will have to take this into account in the future. If Pele still plays as it should.
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    12 May 2023 05: 56
    The development program started in March 2022 and should culminate for the Americans in the creation of a serial small-sized nuclear power plant with a capacity of 1 to 5 MW. At the same time, it is planned to load nuclear fuel into the reactor no more than once every three years. Interestingly, Pele should be the first generation IV reactor in the United States.

    That's when they create at least a prototype, then it will be possible to say and discuss something.
    In the meantime, these are the next "Wishlist".
    ps
    Almost all operating American nuclear power plants were built in the period 1967-1990, new nuclear power plant projects were launched only in 2013 [3]. As of November 2021, the country continues to build 2 new reactors with a total capacity of 2,5 GW. It was decided to abandon the construction of 2 more AP1000 reactors (Virgil C. Summer 2 and 3)[4], due to a twofold increase in the cost of the estimate and the unwillingness of the parties to incur additional costs.

    It is better to read about the real state of American nuclear energy here. https://pikabu.ru/story/konkurentyi_rosatoma_westinghouse_stroitelstvo_ayes_po_amerikanski_4488568
    1. 0
      12 May 2023 07: 14
      There are serious doubts about the safety of such mobile reactors!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Eug
      0
      12 May 2023 10: 31
      Westinghouse has a joint venture in Kharkov, where not the worst Ukrainian brains work.
      1. +1
        13 May 2023 01: 17
        Quote: Eug
        Westinghouse has a joint venture in Kharkov, where not the worst Ukrainian brains work.

        And?
        In the 30 years that have passed since the USSR, these "by no means the worst Ukrainian brains" have been created? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think so. Straightforward. Not a single station, not a single new reactor. Even the technology for annealing the reactor, which extended the life of Ukrainian nuclear power plants, was created in Russia. The only new "nuclear" facility in Ukraine is the Westinghouse spent fuel repository. I suspect that it is in this direction that this "powerful bunch" is working under the leadership of the shtatovites. Exclusively on the issues of replacing Russian fuel with US ones.
  2. +1
    12 May 2023 06: 14
    For me, 5 MW is not so much for an autonomous military base in the north.
    We need heating, water supply, communications, perimeter security, consumer services.
    I think 200 people will be enough.

    Well, then.
    Where is the reserve? That is, you still need diesel generators.

    So far, nuclear power plant technologies have not reached such autonomy and maintainability so that they can be used as small mobile stations.

    But let's see what new errors will be)
    1. 0
      12 May 2023 06: 36
      5 MW is not that much

      The question is, how do they get these 5MW?
      The article is written
      small-sized nuclear power plant with a capacity of 1 to 5 MW.

      I understand that we are talking about one power unit with adjustable power. Then the issue of redundancy is solved by installing a second power unit, especially since
      it is planned to load nuclear fuel into the reactor no more than once every three years

      But if a nuclear power plant is 5 MW, these are already several units combined into one unit, then everything is more complicated.
    2. 0
      12 May 2023 15: 13
      Quote: Login_Off
      5 MW

      Many or few?
      For the middle zone of the Russian Federation, it is believed that at the peak of frost, 300 watts of thermal power are needed to heat a square meter, and in the Arctic - 500 watts. This is about space heating.
      On the
      Quote: Login_Off
      Enough for 200 people.

      Suppose the Soviet standard is 12 m2 of living space per person - this is a sanitary norm, more crowded is already a multiple risk of an increase in diseases, and respiratory and all sorts of other nasty things. That is, for 200 people of the garrison, only heating of living quarters is needed (including the dining room, if it is an army, or kitchens if civilians), you need 200 x 12 x 500 - already 1,2 megawatts just for heating. Plus electric stoves in the dining room, kettles... And the rest for all sorts of radars and stuff.
    3. 0
      12 May 2023 21: 11
      Quote: Login_Off
      5 MW is not so much for an autonomous military base in the north. Need heating
      No need for heating.
      NPP efficiency ~ 35%, the rest is heat.
      All 65% do not use.
      But 35% is correct.
      Use 5 MW of heat for free
      1. 0
        13 May 2023 20: 39
        Use 5 MW of heat for free

        That is, at least - the second circuit, the boiler, the entire duplication system, make-up with boiler water, etc. and so on.
        It is no longer mobile.
  3. 0
    12 May 2023 09: 35
    At BWX Technologies in Lynchburg,

    Painfully familiar plastic overflows on snot, only they also clamped them with clamps))) Mother laziness, by no means a Russian tradition laughing
    Steel must be used, steel! For this, there is an auxiliary plant at each research institute, and in production such carelessness is generally darkness. Well, it's understandable. this is not an advertising project for fooling the voter with "green nanotechnologies", where everything is done beautifully, only it doesn't work, here you can blunder
    1. +3
      12 May 2023 10: 43
      Quote from Bingo
      Painfully familiar plastic overflows on snot, only they also clamped them with clamps)))

      It's bad to be like this! Not "on the snot", "based on innovative biopolymer technologies". smile
  4. -2
    12 May 2023 14: 23
    Their trains derail every week, and they want to put the reactor in a truck. Then this truck will roll over somewhere and hello ....
  5. 0
    7 August 2023 15: 15
    The idea to create a compact type reactor and use it in everyday life is correct in itself. The problem is that so far no one has put it into practice...
  6. -1
    8 August 2023 00: 43
    Truck-sized reactor? Unmanned nuclear submarines and nuclear corvettes with emergency core ejection.
    Cool!