GBU-57A/B MOP bombs: new photos and new details

20
GBU-57A/B MOP bombs: new photos and new details
Soldiers examining a mock GBU-57A/B bomb, March 2023


Since the beginning of the last decade, the US Air Force has been armed with the GBU-57A / B Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb, designed to destroy underground protected structures. For various reasons, this weapon does not receive due attention and rarely appears in open materials. However, now the Pentagon has decided to remind about the presence of super-powerful bombs and has shown them twice in the last month.



Fresh content


On April 2, the 131st bomber wing of the Air Force of the National Guard pcs. Missouri, serving at Whiteman Air Force Base, published an interesting photograph on social networks. In a photo taken a few days earlier, two servicemen examine a mock-up of a GBU-57A/B aerial bomb placed at the base's training center.

The layout repeats the design of a real bomb. In fact, the only difference is the absence of a warhead and a working fuse. Used standard camouflage paint. At the same time, a blue ring is applied to the head part, indicating the educational role of the product. In addition, there is a large inscription prohibiting flights with such a bomb.

The MOP training product is placed on a standard transport trolley and is set up in a configuration for loading onto a carrier. The lattice rudders are folded and fixed, and the bomb is fixed on the cradles.


MOP bomb intended for 509 Squadron

Exactly one month later, on May 2, new photos of the GBU-57A / B bomb appeared on the pages of Whiteman Air Force Base in social networks and a curious news. The 509th Ammunition Squadron has reportedly received two heavy bombs recently. Now the department's specialists will study these products and determine their effectiveness. Perhaps we are talking about field tests using a carrier aircraft.

The press service of the base attached several photographs to the short note. They show the transportation of a MOP bomb on a semi-trailer using a special holding device. The product was transported in the appropriate configuration. Wings and a tail compartment with control devices were removed from it. The back end of the case was covered with a film.

It should be noted that the 509th squadron was given a real aerial bomb capable of solving combat missions. This is evidenced by the marking in the form of a ring of yellow diamonds around the head. In addition, the quality of one of the photographs makes it possible to consider the inscriptions on the side of the hull, indicating its filling - the composition and mass of explosives.

Bunker Buster


The prerequisites for the appearance of the GBU-57A / B bomb appeared at the beginning of the century. So, during the invasion of Iraq in 2003, combat aviation The United States has repeatedly received tasks to attack enemy underground facilities, incl. protected. Practice has shown that the existing range of specialized concrete-piercing bombs does not allow hitting all such targets. In this regard, the Pentagon launched the development of a new bomb with enhanced performance, capable of hitting objects at greater depths and with a higher level of protection.

The new project was designated Massive Ordnance Penetrator. The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) was appointed as the coordinator of the work, and Boeing was assigned to develop the bomb. Also, at different stages, other state and commercial organizations were involved in the project.


The development of the project took about four years. In 2007, AFRL and Boeing began preparations for comprehensive testing. At this stage, prototypes of bombs and warheads were made, and several Air Force aircraft were converted into experimental carriers. In the same year, work began on integrating the MOP bomb into the weapon system of the B-2A stealth bomber.

The first experimental detonation of the warhead for the MOP took place in March 2007. Flight tests of the finished bomb were carried out only in 2009. According to known data, the test program included only a few such events, but it took several years to carry them out and to further improve the design.

Based on the test results, the MOP bomb was put into service under the designation GBU-57A / B. In April 2011, the first contract for the production of a small number of such weapons appeared. According to known data, at least 20 bombs have been manufactured to date. Only B-2A bombers can use them. Work was underway to integrate the MOP into the B-52H weapon system, but their success was not reported.

Products GBU-57A / B are in service with the US Air Force for more than ten years, but during this time they have never been used in real operations. However, training drops are extremely rare - due to the high cost of the product and the complexity of preparing such an event.

Technical features


The GBU-57A/B product is a heavy guided aerial bomb designed to destroy protected and/or buried enemy targets. It differs from other samples of this purpose in increased characteristics obtained by increasing the size and weight, as well as the use of new technical solutions.


The bomb is made in a cylindrical body with an ogival warhead. The body has thick walls, providing high strength and the ability to break through the thickness of the soil or concrete. X-shaped wings of small elongation are mounted in the central part of the hull. In the tail are lattice rudders for aiming at the target.

The tail compartment accommodates the control and guidance system based on satellite navigation. Provides hit accuracy up to several meters, typical for this method of guidance.

The total length of the bomb reaches 6,2 m with a diameter of 800 mm. The mass is declared at the level of 14 tons, which sharply limits the range of possible carriers. According to previously published information, 2400 kg of explosive is placed inside the case. Undermining is carried out by a bottom fuse with a delay mode. The large mass and improved aerodynamics allow the bomb to accelerate to high speed and penetrate at least 60 m of soil.

New photos from Whiteman Air Force Base clarify previously known information about the GBU-57A / B product. So, according to the markings on the real product, its weight is 27 pounds or 125 kg. Combat equipment includes 12 pounds (315 kg) of PBXN-750 explosive (a mixture of HMX with aluminum powder and a plasticizer) and 340,5 pounds (114 kg) of AFX-4590 on a similar basis.

According to known data, mixtures of AFX-757 and PBXN-114 are more powerful than TNT, but at the same time they are stable during manufacture and storage, and are also not very expensive. As a result, a charge with a total mass of approx. 2420 kg shows higher performance than filling in the form of TNT of the same mass. In combination with a robust housing that accounts for approx. 80% of the total mass of the product, such a charge gives the GBU-57A / B bomb special combat characteristics.


Demonstration of opportunities


From a promising aerial bomb GBU-57A / B MOP at one time they did not make secrets. It was openly shown and advertised, and also revealed its characteristics, tasks and opportunities. However, even with this approach, unique "bunker destroyers" did not appear in open materials very often.

Now the Pentagon and the Air Force have broken this kind of “tradition”. In just a month, the MOP product was shown twice. At the same time, real weapons for combat use were demonstrated the other day, and it was also reported that they were going to check and evaluate them. Probably in the near future, 509 Squadron will organize a new test / training bomb drop at the site. It is unlikely that this event will be secret - the Pentagon will not refuse the opportunity to boast of unique weapons.

Recent publications and events may be related to the current political situation and the aspirations of the American leadership. Photos and notes about the tests can be seen as a kind of signal to foreign countries, potential enemies of the United States. They are trying to show third countries that their strategic facilities and leadership are not protected from hypothetical American attacks - stealth planes with special bombs can hit even the most advanced bunkers and shelters.

Whether such signals, hints and veiled threats make sense is a big question with a predictable answer. Foreign states will continue to defend their interests, and will respond appropriately to military threats. And it is likely that as a result of such measures, American super-heavy bombs will lose their potential as a political and military argument.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -14
    5 May 2023 06: 36
    Now they have a mess with wunderwaffles - all that they have have done their best, draw new ones, which are well-forgotten old ones wink Do not leave the Ministry of Truth without work. It is strange that the cartoons they loved were not drawn. like a shooting Zamvolt, or a hypersonic missile that has already hit everyone, which, in principle, they don’t know how to aim at a target, for now. That is, in principle, it will not exist until the guidance system is developed, and it has been unsuccessfully developed there for half a century - since the 70s, when, because of this, the hypersonic program was curtailed
  2. -6
    5 May 2023 07: 05
    The disadvantage of this system is that it is unique and has virtually no serial media. Spirit won't pull it.
    1. +7
      5 May 2023 10: 04
      It is Spirit that is its only carrier.
    2. 0
      11 May 2023 12: 47
      Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
      The disadvantage of this system is that it is unique and has virtually no serial media. Spirit won't pull it.

      That's just the B-2 Spirit will pull it.
      But the fact is that this bomb penetrates 60 feet of soil (although it is not known what kind of soil, soils are different), and not 60 meters as it is written in the article. This is clearly visible in the picture.
      Foot - international designation ft
      or ' - stroke.
      1фут=0,3048м, 60×0,3048=18,288м.
      But I doubt that this bomb is capable of penetrating 60' - 18 meters of soil. And certainly this bomb will not penetrate 18 meters of rock.
      Most likely, these data are intentionally overestimated.
  3. 0
    5 May 2023 07: 35
    Do we have such ammunition, and most importantly, their means of delivery?
    1. 0
      11 May 2023 13: 32
      Quote from: FoBoss_VM
      Do we have such ammunition, and most importantly, their means of delivery?

      Air bombs BETAB-500SHP, RBC-500 BETAB, BETAB-500U, KAB-1500LG-Pr.



      In addition to air bombs, there are NAR S-8B and S-BM, S-8OFP "Armored Pilot", S-13, S-13T, S-25-OFM.
      Missiles Kh-29, Kh-38, Kh-59 with penetrating warhead.
      There are also means of delivery of these ammunition.
      And the best such ammunition is the Kinzhal missile. MiG-31K delivery vehicle.
  4. +1
    5 May 2023 09: 07
    Iranian Nuclear Reactor Gets Nervous)
    1. +5
      5 May 2023 09: 47
      winked
      Do not give MOS to Israel. request
      And on the carriers, the question is - only new versions of F15 can potentially "pull" the MOS in the Israeli Air Force.
      But the Israelis claim that they have found options and can do without the MOP in resolving the "Fordo issue." Smaller "penetrators" have already been handed over to them and they used them.
  5. +3
    5 May 2023 14: 22
    Our non-partners, in fairness, have something to look at in bomb weapons. Quite interesting both technical / engineering solutions and concepts
    1. 0
      11 May 2023 13: 43
      Quote from tatapa
      Our non-partners, in fairness, have something to look at in bomb weapons. Quite interesting both technical / engineering solutions and concepts

      We have something better than this bomb of theirs.
  6. +1
    5 May 2023 22: 26
    As far as I understand, this is a free-falling adjustable bomb? I suppose it can only be dropped from a great height. So it's more likely to finish off the enemy without air defense
    1. 0
      6 May 2023 06: 14
      That said, it's manageable. I'm not going to look for a quote in the text.
    2. 0
      6 May 2023 10: 43
      Quote from alexoff
      As far as I understand, this is a free-falling adjustable bomb? I suppose it can only be dropped from a great height. So it's more likely to finish off the enemy without air defense

      After a year and a half of the Strange Military Operation, can we say that we have air defense?
      Will the Urya-patriots shout about impenetrable, layered air defense, just like they shouted earlier?
      Knowing about our destroyed bridges, warehouses, headquarters, barracks, and even knowing about the incident with the Kremlin.
  7. 0
    6 May 2023 09: 39
    by and large, all NATO weapons transferred to Ukraine must be destroyed as soon as they have advanced 50 km deep into Ukraine. and no one is in danger. ... Why the Russian Armed Forces do not do this, I still do not understand. There are missiles, the railway tracks are always in the same places, it is not necessary to throw partisan groups behind enemy lines, as in 1943. (rail war) .... then (1941 - 1945) hundreds of trains with Wehrmacht equipment did not reach the front)). It is only necessary, instead of destroying the Ukrainian energy structure, to redirect these missiles to destroy trains with military equipment transferred from NATO to Ukraine.
    Why we breathe so unevenly towards the Ukrainian energy system is not clear to me. When the enemy pointed a cocked weapon at you, the first thing to do is to eliminate the threat to your life, and only then deprive the enemy of all the benefits of civilization (energy). Why everything is not so with us - as with people, I will never understand this. I'm just in a daze.
    If you have already been targeted, then the first thing to do is to eliminate the threat, and what about our General Staff of the Armed Forces - they give orders not to destroy the threat, but to destroy some kind of energy system, and then they promote IT as a great victory. (on all information channels). obviously by someone's order, to show the people that they "do not eat bread in vain." And to hit the trains with NATO military equipment, which had just been transferred to Ukraine and still be in the deep rear of Ukraine - WEAK, and only then PR IT through all channels.
    1. -1
      6 May 2023 16: 52
      Quote: Vladimir Mskvchev
      It is only necessary, instead of destroying the Ukrainian energy structure, to redirect these missiles to destroy trains with military equipment transferred from NATO to Ukraine.
      Why we breathe so unevenly towards the Ukrainian energy system is not clear to me.

      Exactly, since the fall this tactic has seemed to me not only not ethical, but also not effective. The calculation was to freeze the citizens of Ukraine and force them to flee the country, creating problems in Europe. But they underestimated 2 things, the first is that the energy system of Ukraine was built in the image of the energy system of Germany, where all the power plants are connected to each other and there are a lot of redundant systems, this was done due to the fact that in the event of a war with NATO, Ukraine had to keep the pressure from the west, as and Germany from the east. And secondly, the readiness of the West and not only to help in recovery after the strikes, a lot of generators, fuel and specialists were sent. The third point is the growing level of air defense / missile defense of Ukraine, especially in Kyiv and other large cities. It is not clear why the patriots are still laughing at the air defense of Ukraine, when, with the advent of Iris-T and Patriot, it greatly intensified and became a serious factor, especially since Iris-T is really a child prodigy, knocking everything down 100%. In total, for the entire NWO, about 10000 KR, BR and kamikaze drones with warheads from 50kg were launched for these purposes, and in the end, no result was expected. Now these 10 mostly high-precision missiles and drones will not be enough in the areas of offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, or they could be used en masse, 000 pieces at a time for the accumulation of equipment and drugs on the march.
      1. +1
        11 May 2023 13: 49
        It was necessary to hit neither the transformers. And in terms of generating capacities, in terms of the machine rooms of power plants themselves. Then there would be more sense from these blows.
      2. 0
        11 July 2023 00: 21
        Quote: karabas-barabas
        Quote: Vladimir Mskvchev
        It is only necessary, instead of destroying the Ukrainian energy structure, to redirect these missiles to destroy trains with military equipment transferred from NATO to Ukraine.
        Why we breathe so unevenly towards the Ukrainian energy system is not clear to me.

        Exactly, since the fall this tactic has seemed to me not only not ethical, but also not effective. The calculation was to freeze the citizens of Ukraine and force them to flee the country, creating problems in Europe. But they underestimated 2 things, the first is that the energy system of Ukraine was built in the image of the energy system of Germany, where all the power plants are connected to each other and there are a lot of redundant systems, this was done due to the fact that in the event of a war with NATO, Ukraine had to keep the pressure from the west, as and Germany from the east. And secondly, the readiness of the West and not only to help in recovery after the strikes, a lot of generators, fuel and specialists were sent. The third point is the growing level of air defense / missile defense of Ukraine, especially in Kyiv and other large cities. It is not clear why the patriots are still laughing at the air defense of Ukraine, when, with the advent of Iris-T and Patriot, it greatly intensified and became a serious factor, especially since Iris-T is really a child prodigy, knocking everything down 100%. In total, for the entire NWO, about 10000 KR, BR and kamikaze drones with warheads from 50kg were launched for these purposes, and in the end, no result was expected. Now these 10 mostly high-precision missiles and drones will not be enough in the areas of offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, or they could be used en masse, 000 pieces at a time for the accumulation of equipment and drugs on the march.

        Uncle, where do you live? What is the ENERGY SYSTEM of Ukraine and what is the ENERGY SYSTEM of Germany? Have you heard the articles "GOELRO Plan" in the course of history at school?
        Energy system of Ukraine. no one finally built, they built only parts in the process of repair and modernization, and then when Tymoshenko gave money. Barely before the NWO, the Energodarsky power center at the Zaporizhia NPP was born, and then it took 20 years to build! For it turned out: not a single company in the WORLD undertakes from scratch to BUILD (key word) 3 power lines 750 kV and a voltage conversion receiving unit with a power of up to 13000 MW. And then not for their own, but for the money of French investors. What in FIG Germany? If you don’t understand energy, there’s nothing to stick your nose in there and pass off your conjectures as the truth! The same can be said about your speech about the air defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and our RK.
    2. 0
      11 May 2023 13: 54
      It was necessary to hit neither the transformers. And in terms of generating capacities, in terms of the machine rooms of power plants themselves. Then there would be more sense from these blows.
  8. 0
    11 May 2023 11: 54
    The large mass and improved aerodynamics allows the bomb to accelerate to high speed and penetrate at least 60 m of soil.
    60 meters is more than the height of an 18-storey building!
    The picture clearly shows that not 60 meters, but 60 feet! 1ft=0,3048m, 60×0,3048=18,288m.
    1. 0
      11 May 2023 12: 19
      But I doubt that this bomb is able to penetrate 60' - 18 meters of soil. And certainly this bomb will not penetrate 18 meters of rock.
      Most likely, these data are intentionally overestimated.