JFS Program: Ballistic Missile Arsenal Ship for the South Korean Navy

15
JFS Program: Ballistic Missile Arsenal Ship for the South Korean Navy
Possible appearance of JFS ships in the version from DSME


The military and political leadership of the Republic of Korea continues to develop military plans in the event of an open clash with the DPRK. One of the key elements of the new strategy is surface ships carrying ballistic missiles, which will be able to strike at distant targets of a potential enemy. This concept was called the Joint Firepower Ship and is now being implemented as part of a full-fledged development work.



Strategy element


Not so long ago, the South Korean leadership announced the development of a new strategy to counter the DPRK called the Korea Massive Punishment & Retaliation plan (“Korean plan for massive punishment and retribution”). The KMPR concept provides for the creation of a number of new ground, air and sea-based strike and defense systems.

In the event of a full-scale conflict, promising means of different bases will have to strike at the critical infrastructure of the DPRK. At the same time, defense systems will protect their own facilities from North Korean missiles.

In the KMPR strategy, a large role is assigned to the marine component. One of the main strike assets in its composition will be surface ships equipped with medium-range or shorter-range ballistic missiles. The idea of ​​developing such an “arsenal ship” has been proposed before, but only in the recent past did the South Korean military begin to work it out in relation to a real strategy.

Now it is known that recently the Ministry of Defense of South Korea has not only studied the subject of missile ships. Not later than last year, preliminary development of such a project on a competitive basis was started. Recently, the customer compared the proposed projects and chose the most interesting one, which will now be developed.


The launch of missiles[/ Center]

Winning project


The program for the development of a promising "arsenal ship" received the Korean name "Naval Missile Base". The English designation Joint Firepower Ship ("Single firepower ship") is also used. In both cases, the title of the topic reflects its essence well.

Two of the largest South Korean shipbuilding companies, Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME) and Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI), participated in the competitive stage of the Joint Firepower Ship program. They have extensive experience in military shipbuilding, which has helped them solve specific design problems and create new projects in general.

According to the South Korean television channel SBS, the Republic of Korea Navy announced the winner of the competition on April 11. The project from DSME was considered more successful in all respects. It is of greater interest in terms of calculated technical and operational characteristics. Further development of such a project will allow the fleet get a ship with the right capabilities.

It is curious that the results of the competition were influenced not only by the features of the developed projects, but also by the reputation of the participants. So, a few years ago, HHI leaked classified information about one of the promising programs. She still hasn't been able to fully regain her credibility and this has worsened her position in the current JFS competition.

The winning company received a new contract, according to which it will have to complete the preliminary design of a promising rocket ship. These works will be carried out before the end of this year, after which the project will pass the examination of the customer. Then a full-fledged technical design and development of documentation will begin, according to which they will be able to build a ship in the future.


The results of the current design stage are planned to be received within the next five years. Probably, during this period, the laying of the lead ship may take place. In total, at the moment they plan to build three promising JFS. With so many ships, at least one will be constantly at sea and on combat duty. However, the timing of the start of duty and the emergence of the possibility of a full-fledged rotation has not yet been determined.

On April 13, shortly after the issuance of the design contract, a related program was launched. The 152nd Committee for the Promotion of Defense Projects of the Ministry of Defense approved and launched the development of a missile system with a ballistic missile for JFS. Work will begin in the next financial year and will continue until 2036. The creation of the rocket was estimated at 600 billion won (approx. 467 million US dollars).

Possible appearance


At the moment, we are only talking about the development of a general concept, but the development company is already ready to show the approximate appearance of the future ship with missiles. So, a short promotional video was published, which shows the JFS ships at sea and their combat work with the launch of missiles. It is obvious that in the future the appearance of the ships may change, but the general provisions and decisions of the project are clear even now.

The video shows the ships built in a traditional hull and with a characteristic low-profile "inconspicuous" superstructure. The size and displacement of such a ship cannot be estimated. At the same time, it can be assumed that in order to accommodate a given ammunition load, a ship must be no smaller than current destroyers or even approach cruisers. So, the length of the ship can reach 180-200 m, and the displacement can exceed 10 thousand tons.

On the bow deck of the ship, in front of the superstructure, various equipment is placed and, apparently, anti-aircraft launchers. The XNUMXD models show the stand-alone plant and the mine complex. How and with what JFS ships will carry out self-defense has not yet been reported.


The central part of the ship and the main volume of the superstructure are used to accommodate the "main caliber". They will accommodate several vertical launchers with cells for ballistic missiles. In promotional materials, the ship has 12 identical installations, but in a real project their number may be different. According to the terms of reference, the ship must carry 80 missiles.

Recently, South Korea began developing missiles for JFS ships, but the details of this project have not yet been reported. Given the level of technology development in the South Korean rocket industry and the limitations of the surface platform, it can be assumed that short- or medium-range ballistic missiles will be created for ships. These can be special modifications of existing samples or newly developed products.

The Korean peninsula has a limited size, and therefore, even short-range ballistic missiles (500-1500 km) will be enough for JFS ships to solve basic combat missions. Being in the Sea of ​​Japan or the Yellow Sea, the "arsenal ships" will be able to attack any targets throughout the territory of the DPRK. At the same time, depending on the parameters of the missiles used, they will be able to operate at a great distance from the coast, outside the zone of destruction of enemy anti-ship systems.

The use of medium-range missiles flying 1500 km or further will further expand the area of ​​responsibility of the JFS ship and allow solving more complex tasks. However, such a missile system will be much more complicated, which will negatively affect the cost of the program. Also, larger missiles will reduce the possible size of the ammunition on board the ship. In addition, this version of the “arsenal ship” turns out to be redundant for use in the framework of the KMPR plan and confrontation with the DPRK.

old ideas


The concept of an "arsenal ship", which is a platform for placing a large number of strike missiles, was proposed a long time ago. However, with all the advantages, such a concept has drawbacks, due to which no such project has progressed beyond development. At the same time, it contributed to the emergence and wide distribution of universal high-capacity vertical launchers for ships of a "traditional" appearance.

Now South Korea has returned to the old idea of ​​a specialized "arsenal". Due to such ships, she plans to get special strike capabilities as part of the confrontation with her northern neighbor. Whether the South Korean industry will be able to solve the tasks and create the required ship will become known in a few years. Then it will turn out whether a curious but ambiguous concept makes sense in modern conditions.
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    April 26 2023 05: 26
    If the money has nowhere to go, then figs with them. In general, this is a first strike weapon - and that's all you need to know about the peacefulness of the YuKs
    1. +4
      April 26 2023 08: 34
      Korea has very specific conditions and a very specific main enemy, without a serious fleet and air force. An arsenal ship with a moderate frigate escort (which they release like sausages - for example, for 7 now), there is nothing to counter the northerners.


      This is not only an increase in strike power, but also strikes from other directions, which stretches the air defense / missile defense.
      1. -1
        April 26 2023 13: 56
        Quote: donavi49
        very specific main enemy

        That's it, with a developed system of underground shelters. And this "arsenal" is intended for a non-nuclear opening of this system, in my opinion. So for the first hit.

        Quote: donavi49
        An arsenal ship with a moderate frigate escort (which they release like sausages - for example, for 7 now), there is nothing to counter the northerners.
        China can also be called northerners. And he has more opportunities ... And for China, these "arsenals" will also look like a threat.
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        If the money has nowhere to go, then figs with them. In general, this is a first strike weapon - and that's all you need to know about the peacefulness of the YuKs
      2. 0
        April 30 2023 15: 51
        Quote: donavi49
        Korea has very specific conditions and a very specific main enemy, without a serious fleet and air force. An arsenal ship with a moderate frigate escort (which they release like sausages - for example, there are already 7), nothing to counter the northerners.



        ??
        And why should they? From the border of Korea to Seoul is less than 50 km. The northerners, if they wish, will gouge the enemy's capital without any fleet with systems like our "Hurricane".
        They have them.

        And missiles of the Iskander class will reliably cover the entire territory of the South Caucasus with a range.
        Why fence ships where trucks can handle?
  2. +4
    April 26 2023 06: 08
    Will the South Korean industry be able to solve the tasks and create the required ship

    I have no doubt that it will work.
    However, with all the advantages, such a concept has drawbacks, due to which no such project has progressed beyond development.

    If you do not suffer from gigantomania, then the idea is quite sound. The RK has a small area, ground-based BR launchers can be easily calculated and hit, and you still have to manage to get into a ship somewhere in the sea ...
    According to the terms of reference, the ship must carry 80 missiles.

    Still, there will be more in reality. KDX III has 128 cells, the arsenal ship will be much larger...
    1. 0
      April 28 2023 14: 18
      Quote: Doccor18
      Still, there will be more in reality. KDX III has 128 cells, the arsenal ship will be much larger...

      I agree with the rest, but with regard to the number of cells, I believe
      that 80 is enough. We have the same number at Nakhimov. Talking about WPU
      for attack missiles. More is not economically feasible. Maybe
      do not have time to start everything, if that. And the cell size is larger than the Mk-41. hi
  3. +1
    April 26 2023 08: 51
    In the pictures, it has 14 "square" TPU blocks, similar to those used in Kings of Sejong. There, each block is designed for 48 cells. The proposed concept can have up to 672 cells.
    1. +1
      April 26 2023 15: 12
      similar to those used in Kings of Sejong. There, each block is designed for 48 cells. The proposed concept can have up to 672 cells.

      ballistic missile surface ships
      BR with a range of 500-1500 km is larger in size and weight than missiles and cruise missiles.
  4. +2
    April 26 2023 09: 23
    The concept of an "arsenal ship", which is a platform for placing a large number of strike missiles, was proposed a long time ago. However, with all the advantages, such a concept has drawbacks, due to which no such project has progressed beyond development.

    Progressed, moreover, to the practical implementation.



    The Americans converted four Ohio-class SSBNs into SSGNs carrying 154 cruise missiles in the UVP.
    1. +3
      April 26 2023 15: 48
      Quote: sergej_84
      The Americans converted four Ohio-class SSBNs into SSGNs carrying 154 cruise missiles in the UVP.

      Forced to be refurbished. Since the alternative was decommissioning and dismantling - because after the signing of the next contract on restrictions, these SSBNs turned out to be off-limit.
      But so far there have been no remodeled arsenal ships.
      1. +1
        3 June 2023 06: 37
        Forced, it can and so. But a volley of 154 Tomahawks is not a good surprise for any country and any air defense.
  5. -1
    April 26 2023 10: 02
    It's hard to come up with a crazier idea. In place of several dozen cheap and practically unopened installations on land, for the same money, there will be one very expensive and easily opened surface ship of 10 thousand tons. It will be an excellent target for all enemy missile systems, boats, aircraft and submarines.
    It's better to give money to Daewoo and Hyundai don't make this misunderstanding. We have such a practice of paying the orchestra not to play and not interfere with people's rest.
  6. +1
    April 26 2023 10: 08
    80 cells is not enough. Especially for an arsenal ship. But on the other hand, the DPRK is not so big that there would be a need to have several ships with 200+ cells.

    But since the cells are universal, it makes sense to have many 200+ cells. Because some of the cells will be occupied by air defense missiles both for self-defense and for the creation of layered air defense against missiles and aircraft of the DPRK in the event of war (and as we remember, the Republic of Korea, unlike the DPRK, did not sign a truce)
  7. -1
    April 26 2023 14: 24
    Quote: Mustachioed Kok
    But since the cells are universal, it makes sense to have many 200+ cells. Because some of the cells will be occupied by air defense missiles both for self-defense and for the creation of layered air defense against missiles and aircraft of the DPRK in the event of war (and as we remember, the Republic of Korea, unlike the DPRK, did not sign a truce)

    A truce is also a war. It is only necessary to stop the truce and resume hostilities.
    It is true that the protectorate (RK) does not have the right and did not sign a truce. Never in history did the local Hiwis have the right to decide something. But the truce was signed by the UN command, and the protectorate troops then and now are under the full and unconditional control of this command.
  8. 0
    April 27 2023 20: 55
    It will be expensive to stuff such a ship with rockets! The concept of application is not very clear, is it supposed to be moored somewhere beyond Japan and wait for X hour so that some submarine in the port does not sink it? In general, given the plans of the Americans to ride around Japan in order to hit China with ballistic missiles, I won’t be surprised that this is not done at all against the DPRK