Cruise missile Kh-50. A new threat to the Kyiv regime

58
Cruise missile Kh-50. A new threat to the Kyiv regime
The possible appearance of the X-50 rocket according to Jane's


In recent days, Ukraine has been talking about the promising Kh-50 air-launched cruise missile being developed for the Russian aerospace forces. The Ukrainian command is afraid that in the near future this product will reach mass production, and then it will be used as part of the Special Operation. It is understood that the new high-performance ALCM will complement other strike assets and become an additional threat to the Kyiv regime.



Waiting for blows


On April 13, a representative of the Ukrainian General Staff, Brigadier General Aleksey Gromov, held another briefing. During the event, curious information was voiced about the possible rearmament of the Russian Aerospace Forces, which will create an additional threat to Ukrainian formations and the Kyiv regime as a whole.

Referring to his sources, A. Gromov said that already in June the Russian defense industry could start mass production of the latest X-50 type ALCMs. After accumulating a certain stock of such and other weapons, Russia will be able to intensify missile attacks on Ukrainian targets.

To calm the public in anticipation of the next attacks, the general tried to raise the topic of Russian problems in the field of production. He suggested that the current capabilities for the production of weapons and equipment will not allow the Russian army to restore reserves even in the medium term, and therefore the defense capability will fall. Predictably, these claims were not supported by any evidence.


Modern missile Kh-101. Promising X-50 may look like her

General Gromov's statements about the production and future use of Kh-50 missiles attracted attention both in Ukraine and abroad. Profile publications and analysts are building different versions of the possible timing and pace of production. In addition, some are trying to explain why the Russian industry will never be able to master the production of new ALCMs.

In general, there is a standard set of topics. At the same time, the technological backwardness of Russia and the critical dependence on foreign products are mentioned, as well as the willingness to mass-produce weapon and use it for the purpose of "aggression" against Ukraine.

It is characteristic that in the context of the last "News' no evidence is provided. At the same time, the Ukrainian side expresses concern and openly fears new Russian missiles. It turns out that the Kiev command, despite all the boasting and ostentatious optimism, understands the real state of affairs, as well as the prospects for the development of the current situation.

Perspective development


The Kh-50 air-launched cruise missile is one of the latest domestic developments in the field of weapons for long-range aviation. In addition, this is one of the most closed projects. Not much is known about him, and the available information is not very detailed. In particular, only an approximate level of tactical and technical characteristics is disclosed.

According to known data, the future X-50 ALCM, also known as X-SD (“medium range”) or product “715”, was developed at the Raduga State Design Bureau named after. AND I. Bereznyak since the early nineties. The aim of the project was to create a new ammunition for long-range bombers, capable of supplementing the existing range of missiles. To obtain the necessary capabilities, the main characteristics of the X-50 had to be inferior to the products of the X-55 or X-101.


The development of a new rocket continued at least until the first half of the 2014s. In 715, the State Design Bureau "Raduga" and the company "Tupolev" signed a contract on the joint implementation of certain work. Probably, it was planned to integrate the product "2016" into the armament complex of Tu aircraft. In 18-XNUMX ground tests of the new ALCM were reported.

What stage the X-50 project is currently at is unknown. Official information about him has not been published in recent years. At the same time, it can be assumed that the rocket is really approaching the production launch stage. According to various estimates, it could start as part of the new State Armaments Program for 2018-27.

If work on the X-50 / X-SD project was not stopped for any reason and is still ongoing, then a finished product may appear in the foreseeable future. Soon it will have to be adopted and mastered by the troops.

Technical features


The Kh-50 is believed to be a low-profile, medium-range subsonic cruise missile designed for long-range bombers. When it was created, ready-made developments from previous projects were used, which led to similarities with some existing products, such as the X-101/102. At the same time, new solutions are being used.

The X-SD missile should be built on the basis of a glider with characteristic contours that reduce radar visibility. In the central part of the fuselage there should be a wing that is laid out in flight, in the tail - plumage. X-50 does not need a large supply of fuel, which has reduced its size and weight. It should be smaller and lighter than the serial X-101 ALCM, which has a length of approx. 7,5 m and a starting weight of up to 2400 kg.


X-101 missiles on the revolver launcher of the Tu-160 bomber

Like other domestic modern types of ALCMs, the X-50 should be equipped with a turbojet engine. She needs a short-life engine with limited thrust, capable of providing high subsonic flight speeds. The flight range is unknown, but is estimated at 1500-1600 km.

The means and principles of missile control are unknown. Probably, there are navigation instruments on board to fly to the target with given coordinates. Also, some sources mentioned the presence of an optical-correlation homing head for more accurate target engagement. On board the missile there may be means of breaking through enemy air defenses, such as a jamming station, dropped decoys, etc.

The product "715" must carry a high-explosive fragmentation warhead weighing up to several hundred kilograms. Perhaps the main charge is placed in a strong case that provides a penetrating effect. Also, some sources mention the possibility of using a cassette warhead.

All current long-range bombers of the Russian Aerospace Forces can be carriers of the reduced Kh-50 missile. The placement of such weapons is possible both on the internal turret installation and on the external sling. The ammunition load of one aircraft can reach 10-12 units. At the same time, the use of new ALCMs requires some updating of weapon control systems.

Additional tool


Even the limited amount of available data makes it possible to understand why the Russian Aerospace Forces need the Kh-50 missile, and what advantages it will be possible to obtain with its help. In general, we are talking about expanding the range of available ammunition, closing an important niche, and even some savings.


It should be recalled that the Kh-55 and Kh-101 ALCMs are classified as strategic weapons and have a corresponding flight range of 5500 km. However, as practice has shown, not in all situations such characteristics are used to the full. To solve a number of combat missions, bombers need a missile with similar accuracy and efficiency, but with a shorter range and reduced dimensions.

Thus, in the future, having received the 715 products, our long-range aviation will be able to choose ammunition that is more appropriate for the task. If the launch line is at a distance of no more than 1500 km from the target, it will be possible to use the lighter and cheaper Kh-50 ALCM. At long ranges, existing products with enhanced performance will continue to be used.

Reason for concern


The latest news about the development of the promising Kh-50 missile appeared a long time ago. At what stage this project is now, and how soon the VKS will be able to get ready-made weapons, is unknown. However, it is already clear that it is of particular interest to the armed forces and has every chance of reaching production and operation.

An interesting fact is that the Ukrainian command in advance considers the new Russian missile as another serious threat and speaks openly about it. Perhaps this is some kind of "cunning plan" with unclear goals - or the enemy really understands what threatens him. One way or another, Kh-50 missiles, if they appear in the arsenals of the Aerospace Forces, will be able to join the Special Operation and show their potential, regardless of Ukrainian fears or forecasts.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    April 19 2023 06: 47
    I will explain to the local public why the X-50 missile is strategically important to us in mantras "rockets never end".

    In fact, Ukrainians are also running out of air defense missiles. Analysts usually estimate the stock of our cruise missiles at 25% from the beginning of the NWO. We still have quite a few Iskanders, because they are cherished for the "general battle" and the Iskanders just know how to bring down bridges, because. unlike other missiles, this is one of their direct purposes. To destroy the bridge, Iskander is given the optical head of the "Radar", which allows you to hit the bridge very accurately and detonate in time. We still have more than 500 Iskanders, but the problem is that only 50 of them are made a year. Therefore, it is not for pounding the table with the fist, for banging on the lid of the coffin.

    A huge problem in the production of Calibers is the expensive and complex turbojet engine TRDD-50. The volume of their production is incomprehensible, because. Saturn set up 2 stands and probably just steals turbine blades from decommissioned USSR engines. How it turns out to do this is a question, but the turbofan engine-50 is not a heavily modified descendant of the ancient Soviet cruise missile engines.



    According to rumors, the X-50 is equipped with a ramjet engine
    Scramjet engines do not have any blades or compressors. As well as moving parts. After acceleration to the desired speed by the carrier, the rocket flies simply by compressing the oncoming flow.

    Works as per the diagram below. As you might guess, direct-flow ones are much cheaper than turbojet ones and can even use solid fuel. Their production volume can definitely be much higher.

    Plus, ramjet engines, that if a turbojet "suffocates" in the stratosphere, then ramjet engines usually work well at high altitude. Therefore, it is sometimes possible to fly above the ceiling of most air defenses at 22-25 km.



    It's a game changer, definitely. Most likely, Caliber firing will soon become a thing of the past due to a shortage of engines.

    A good question is why do we need our fleet then, if it cannot launch the X-50, the rocket needs to be launched at flight speed right away, but Calibers will be in short supply
    1. +10
      April 19 2023 07: 22
      X-50 is an inconspicuous subsonic cruise missile

      According to rumors, the X-50 is worth direct-flow jet engine

      Rumors, rumors, rumors...
      According to rumors, a ramjet engine does not work at subsonic speed in principle, however.
      1. +5
        April 19 2023 07: 32
        They work. And they are the cheapest direct-flow.

        They are less used for the reason that they stall easily when the speed drops below Mach 1/5, they also have lower efficiency. However, Ukraine does not need a high range.

        The rumor about the ramjet engine came from Jane's leak, in fact, the pictures in the article are from there, but no one saw the rocket. However, the picture does not show an outboard turbojet engine as in caliber.

        Side air intakes are common in subsonic ramjet engines, as in the first prototypes.
        1. +3
          April 19 2023 09: 17
          "The rumor about the ramjet engine" - I'm delighted!!! And technical literature, textbooks to read? There are no rumors, there is theory backed up by practice. And they teach it in universities. In aviation, one hundred percent.
          1. +3
            April 19 2023 11: 51
            Quote: Amateur
            According to rumors, a ramjet engine does not work at subsonic speed in principle, however.

            American helicopter YH-32 Hornet, the propeller of which rotates with the help of 2 direct-flow engines located at the ends of the blades. The engines were started when the propeller was spinning up to 150 rpm.
            1. +1
              April 19 2023 17: 29
              Our (Milevtsy) also made such a helicopter, only with a turbojet engine. As a result, they were recognized as not promising. It's very complicated. Mi V-7.
      2. +6
        April 19 2023 07: 52
        Quote: Amateur
        According to rumors, a ramjet engine at subsonic speed, in principle, does not work

        Works of course. True, the efficiency is so low that their use is meaningless from the word at all.
      3. 0
        April 19 2023 17: 16
        German V-1s are just very sound, equipped with a ramjet engine. The aircraft of the British RAF shot them down without any problems even turning them over with their wing.
        1. +2
          April 19 2023 19: 49
          Quote: andrewkor
          German V-1s are just very sound, equipped with a ramjet engine.
          You are confusing PuVRD (pulsating air-jet engine) with ramjet (ramjet engine).
          The V-1 was equipped with a PuVRD.


          ramjet (ramjet engine)
          1. 0
            April 19 2023 21: 00
            Let me complete the pictorial series, here is Glukharev's engine, from his helicopter.
            The father of Evgeny Mikhailovich Glukharev, Mikhail Glukharev, was the right hand of Igor Sikorsky. Mr. Sikorsky did not believe that this PuVRD would work.

            google.com/search?q=engine+Glukharev+G8-2
            google.com/images?q=engine+Glukharev+G8-2
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluhareff_Pressure_Jet
            http://www.airwar.ru/enc/heli/meg1x.html
          2. 0
            April 20 2023 19: 40
            Even according to the schemes that you have given, there is a confuser at the entrance to the ramjet to reduce the flow rate to subsonic, after which the fuel burns out and, then, accelerates to supersonic in the combined nozzle.
      4. 0
        April 30 2023 18: 10
        You're right!
        But if the Tu-95 lowers this toy from a height, then at half the fall it will enter supersonic and start the engine.
    2. +1
      April 19 2023 09: 13
      As you might guess, direct-flow ones are much cheaper than turbojet ones and can even use solid fuel.
      Is it possible to bring the scheme to the use of SOLID fuel in a ramjet? I don't know where to put it in what hole.
      1. 0
        April 19 2023 10: 24
        I emphasize right away - this is only a theory, I do not know its practical application. Solid fuel is placed in the direct-flow combustion chamber. The start of the product is carried out by igniting the CT, by the time it burns out, the product accelerates to the required speed, after which the direct flow is started directly. It's in theory. I don’t even want to write about the problems that arise in this concept, there are a lot of them, so this concept has not received any development at the moment.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +3
          April 19 2023 12: 03
          Quote from: Alex_mech
          Is it possible to bring the scheme to the use of SOLID fuel in a ramjet?
          We are armed with rockets, where the accelerating powder accelerator is located inside the combustion chamber of the main engine. After the solid fuel burns out, the residues are ejected and the main engine starts to work. Due to this layout, the rocket turned out to be compact. I don’t remember the name of the rocket, but this is not an aircraft version (it seems to be a ship version).
          1. +2
            April 19 2023 20: 44
            Quote: Bad_gr
            I don’t remember the name of the rocket, but this is not an aircraft version (it seems to be a ship version).

            Mosquito has such an engine (P-270, it seems) ...
            RCC 3M-80.
            The rocket is equipped with a combined (sustained-through ramjet 3D83 engine with a built-in starting powder accelerator) propulsion system. The accelerator is placed in the nozzle of the main engine, after 3-4 seconds after the start it burns and is pushed out of the nozzle by the oncoming air flow.
            1. 0
              April 19 2023 22: 05
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              The rocket is equipped with a combined (sustained-through ramjet 3D83 engine with a built-in starting powder accelerator) propulsion system. The accelerator is placed in the nozzle of the main engine, after 3-4 seconds after the start it burns and is pushed out of the nozzle by the oncoming air flow.

              Thanks for the information.
        3. 0
          April 19 2023 19: 44
          It's not even science fiction, it's fantasy. Need strong fire magic
      2. 0
        April 19 2023 17: 47
        China has successfully tested an air combat missile system with a solid-fuel ramjet engine (solid-fuel variable flow ramjet engine) with variable thrust, reported with reference to airrecognition on June 7, 2017.
        The rocket was created by engineers of the 4th Research Institute, affiliated with the state company CASIC (China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation). It is reported that the new SD will go, in particular, into service with the latest J-20 stealth fighter.
        UR is capable of hitting targets at a distance of up to 300 km at a speed of more than 5M.
        It is reported that the work has been carried out since 2000.

        SFDR is currently being developed by the Defense Research and Development Organization of India for air-to-air missiles with a projected range of 350 km. The technology can also be applied to surface-to-air missiles.
        The system uses solid fuel ramjet engine. The ramjet takes oxygen from the atmosphere during flight.
        Development of the SFDR began in 2013.
        The missile is being developed primarily by the Defense Research and Development Laboratory (DRDL) and the Emirate Research Center (RCI) in Hyderabad. The High Energy Materials Research Laboratory (HEMRL) has developed a nozzleless booster, and a ramjet is being developed with
        Russia.
        Ground testing of the rocket began in 2017.
        Another successful test was conducted on April 8, 2022. The test demonstrated the reliable operation of all critical components of the missile system of the complex and completed all the tasks.
        пишет
        Wikipedia

        Reports of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Chemistry, Materials Sciences, 2020, V. 490, No. 1, pp. 51-56
        For the first time, the analysis of the combustion stabilization mechanism in the solid fuel charge channel in a ramjet engine with a combustion stabilizer has been carried out.

        Source: ramjets, solid-fuel variable flow ramjet engine
        it can be shoved

      3. 0
        April 30 2023 18: 12
        God forbid!
        Only liquid fuel. The truth is, I don't know.
        And I don’t have enough imagination for what solid-fuel devices need air.
    3. 0
      April 19 2023 09: 13
      “They can even use solid fuel” - only for overclocking, and this is a wild headache for designers. In the main mode, only liquid fuel is used.
      “After accelerating to the desired speed by the carrier, the rocket flies simply by compressing the oncoming flow.” - I'm embarrassed to ask - how to understand this phrase? Do you have any idea what atmospheric flight is like?
      1. 0
        April 19 2023 09: 44
        There's a stream of consciousness beyond science fiction and the laws of physics.
    4. +2
      April 19 2023 10: 41
      And "religion" does not allow using the accelerating stage? The Navy would need such a product ...
    5. +2
      April 19 2023 21: 14
      Quote from russianreactor
      According to rumors, the X-50 is equipped with a ramjet engine

      Rumors are good! "But the truth is better!" (With)
      And I (as a local aborigine) have a slightly different infa:
      X-50 missile equipped with turbofan engine developed by JSC "Omsk Engine Design Bureau" (OMKB) "Product 37-04" (or TRDD-50B), reaches a range of more than 1500 km, having a cruising speed of 700 km/h and a maximum speed of 950 km/h.
    6. 0
      April 19 2023 22: 49
      Where did you get data on the production of engines? Previously, they were positioned as simple and cheap, shoved them wherever possible, now they are suddenly in short supply and are gone. Are there any sources based on facts?
    7. 0
      April 20 2023 19: 29
      Two small notes:
      1. Were there really no Russian-language ramjet schemes available?
      2. Dumb, and I don’t understand how you are trying to burn solid fuel in the ramjet combustion chamber?
    8. 0
      26 July 2023 15: 53
      A huge problem in the production of Calibers is the expensive and complex turbojet engine TRDD-50.
      __________

      Where do you collect such cranberries? This is a cheap, low-resource, simple engine. They have been in production for 100 years. Is it expensive there?

      What the heck is straight through??? Enough to drive nonsense! Cruise missiles must fly far and long. For this, they have trd. How to get a rocket engine???
  2. +9
    April 19 2023 07: 34
    "It is supposed ... If ... Perhaps ... " Oh, this Ryabov Kirill, nothing will stop him from writing an article on a topic unknown to him what
  3. +1
    April 19 2023 07: 38
    The issue is media. If the missiles cannot be used with the Su-34/35 they are useless. The rise of each strategist is tracked, as is the entire flight. Accordingly, they also know the moment of launching missiles. That means it's not a problem to track down and destroy the KR.
    1. +3
      April 19 2023 09: 30
      Not certainly in that way. The KR does not necessarily fly in a straight line, it can maneuver, so it is extremely difficult to determine its route. Secondly, jamming equipment can be installed on the CD, which greatly complicates its interception. Thirdly, they do not know the moment of launching missiles from the word at all, a strategist can barrage along the border of a potential launch for quite a long time, and one can only guess where the launch will take place. Destroying a low-flying CR is easy only in a computer game, in life this is a very difficult goal.
    2. 0
      April 19 2023 15: 56
      The main "idea" of the X-50 was to arm the Tu22M3M with a drum with such missiles and turn the Tu22 into a carrier of the CD. But this was during the INF Treaty .... and before the resumption of production of the Tu160. In the presence of Sukhoi aircraft, a CD is needed for suspension on them. In the West, such are put into service. Range up to 900 km.
      1. -1
        April 19 2023 17: 18
        Quote: Zaurbek
        In the presence of Sukhoi aircraft, a CD is needed for suspension on them.
        I also think that the rocket is being created for the Su-27 family. Otherwise sense of reduction of the sizes?
        1. 0
          April 19 2023 22: 54
          What makes you think that we are talking about reducing the size? Isn't this an enlarged Kh-59MK2, also known as the Kh-69 with increased dimensions, a prismatic hull and an improved engine for greater range?
    3. +1
      April 19 2023 20: 57
      Quote from cold wind
      If the missiles cannot be used with the Su-34/35 they are useless.

      No need to be so categorical! Tu-22M3M takes 6 of them into the internal compartments. And 400 kg of explosives in a penetrating warhead is not a pound of raisins.
      I don’t know about the Su-30/35, but the “duckling” (Su-34) can also carry them with the S-70V.
      In addition, there is infa on the network that
      the first batch of X-50s is already being delivered to the Long-Range Aviation and Su-family fighters (including the Su-57). This information was recently confirmed by the manufacturer, emphasizing that a fairly large batch has already been shipped.
  4. +2
    April 19 2023 08: 03
    Quote from cold wind
    Quote: Amateur
    According to rumors, a ramjet engine at subsonic speed, in principle, does not work

    Works of course. True, the efficiency is so low that their use is meaningless from the word at all.


    These are questions for Jane's. In any case, the production of turbojet engines is not impressive. Regular analytics gives about 50 units per year for each type of our heavy missiles. Moreover, the price tag for cruise missiles is rapidly moving towards Tomogavka. The caliber is already worth over $1 million.

    Either they will learn to make smaller and cheaper missiles, or there will be raids on Ukraine only from drones and planning bombs

    Today, only drones flew to Odessa.

    Shortage of missiles for us and Ukrainians
    1. +6
      April 19 2023 09: 38
      Rather, it was not about the ramjet, but about the PUVRD. Here it is designed just for subsonic and is also extremely cheap to manufacture. Of the minuses - the efficiency is noticeably lower than that of a turbojet engine (more fuel is needed, but given the estimated 1500 km it is not so critical) and an extremely loud and characteristic sound will give a huge head start to Iranian "mopeds" laughing
      1. 0
        April 19 2023 23: 05
        Most likely, it was about GZUR, but something was mixed up in the files or in American intelligence and dumped into one heap. Kh-50 is an intermediate missile for Kh-59MK2 and Kh-101, most likely, only Kh-50 will be made instead of the last two. And long-range bombers will be left with GZUR and Kh-BD, Kh-50 will be an option for them
    2. 0
      April 19 2023 22: 58
      Where do these numbers come from? They make more than 50 turbojet engines for missiles, they put this engine on calibers, and on the Kh-59, and on the Kh-35, and they delivered to a bunch of countries 15 years ago in much larger quantities, and now everything has fallen apart? And this despite the fact that production was already organized in the Russian Federation, and not in the USSR?
  5. +3
    April 19 2023 09: 09
    unknown, possible, suspected
    Very informative
  6. KCA
    +2
    April 19 2023 09: 39
    The Kh-55 and Kh-55SM carry only TNBs, on their basis the Kh-555 with a conventional warhead was developed and produced, the Kh-50 program is officially closed, as in fact, they probably won’t tell us, some kind of Kh-51 can be developed
  7. +3
    April 19 2023 09: 45
    why the Russian Aerospace Forces needs the X-50 missile, and what advantages can be obtained with its help.

    The main thing is cheapness and the possibility of production on a large scale - tens of thousands a year. Without these advantages, there will be no benefit from the new rocket.
  8. 0
    April 19 2023 09: 48
    Quote from russianreactor
    A good question is why do we need our fleet then, if it cannot launch the X-50, the rocket needs to be launched at flight speed right away, but Calibers will be in short supply

    The initial speed can be given by accelerators or even a catapult.
    1. +1
      April 19 2023 10: 29
      The accelerator is the weight and dimensions, and very sickly, given the fact that the direct flow works normally only at high altitudes. As for the catapult, frankly, you got excited wink
  9. +3
    April 19 2023 09: 54
    Quote: Amateur
    According to rumors, a ramjet engine does not work at subsonic speed in principle, however.

    According to other rumors, it works even better at high subsonic speeds. At the same time, the subsonic engine turns out to be simpler and cheaper, and different fuels can beat.
    In the USSR, such engines were made back in the Second World War, and in Germany a fighter project with coal fuel was beaten.
  10. +3
    April 19 2023 10: 34
    By the way, about the relative cheapness of straight-through - this is a myth. A ramjet motor has its own characteristics, which makes it not at all cheap. Of course, it is necessary to compare with close-thrust turbojet engines.
  11. +3
    April 19 2023 10: 36
    missiles are certainly good, but the most important thing is reconnaissance, without reconnaissance, no missiles are enough
  12. 0
    April 19 2023 10: 37
    I have always been interested in the question, why is it impossible to design and put on stream an air-launched cruise missile? You can call it the X-1000. With a launch range of 1000 km, a weight of 1000 kg, a flight speed of 1000 km / h, a b / h weight of 300-400 kg. And it will be possible to hang them not only under the Tu-22M3, but also under the Su-30, 34, 35, 57 in an amount of 3 to 5 pieces. And a simple air squadron, for example, a Su-34, in the amount of 12 aircraft, can launch from 36 to 60 guided cruise missiles per flight.
    1. +2
      April 19 2023 11: 10
      Su-30SM2, Su-34, Su-35, Su-57 can carry KR X-50 weighing 1500-1600 kg, like KAB-1500, which have the same weight.
      In the photo of the Su-34 in flight with two KAB-1500s under the wings, instead of them there may well be two KR X-50s, weighing 1600 kg each.
      1. -1
        April 19 2023 15: 58
        So the dagger is hung up. So far, no one has announced the X50 on Sukhoi
    2. 0
      April 19 2023 11: 27
      Quote: VohaAhov
      why is it impossible to design and put on stream an air-launched cruise missile? With a launch range of 1000 km, a weight of 1000 kg, a flight speed of 1000 km / h, a b / h weight of 300-400 kg.

      Except as sabotage, this cannot be explained.
      Quote: VohaAhov
      And a simple air squadron, for example, a Su-34, in the amount of 12 aircraft, can launch from 36 to 60 guided cruise missiles per flight.

      That's it. Now we can not make a massive air raid. Up to 100 CR in a salvo is our maximum, and then with the involvement of the fleet.
      1. +1
        April 19 2023 13: 40
        “Up to 100 CR in a salvo is our maximum” - Open Yandex maps, find the Engels airfield, set the “satellite” mode and count - Tu-160 12 pieces, Tu-95 17 pieces, total 29 units. We take at least 6 CR per vehicle and get a salvo of 174 CR. I got over a hundred. And that's just Engels.
        1. +1
          April 19 2023 16: 00
          Another thing is that for any CR (P500, X50, X101, caliber) the set of components is the same ... and the problem with mass production of the total number of CRs is the same. There are turbojet engines on all missiles, plus or minus the same brains on all missiles.
  13. -1
    April 19 2023 15: 54
    The accelerator is the weight and dimensions, and very sickly, given the fact that the direct flow works normally only at high altitudes. As for the catapult, frankly, you got excited

    Boosters usually reset after launch.
    PuVRD can be launched from catapults. But if we are talking about ordinary ramjet engines, then they normally work both at low altitudes and at speeds close to sound, although with worse efficiency than turbojet engines. But just here we are talking about a short range of missiles.
  14. -3
    April 19 2023 22: 10
    If Russia lacks large missiles, then why does it need small missiles. It seems to me that this is a throw-in. If there are not enough chips for assembly, then it is better to make a couple of large rockets.
    X50 is more suitable for nuclear weapons. Small rocket.
    X50 with nuclear filling is a serious challenge in my opinion
    1. 0
      April 20 2023 08: 46
      If there are not enough chips for assembly

      We have to buy washing machines and solder chips!
      Could you clarify which chips are missing? I will receive from the warehouse and send it out, nothing is a pity for our army!
  15. 0
    April 20 2023 18: 21
    The Kh-50 air-launched cruise missile is one of the latest domestic developments in the field of weapons for long-range aviation.


    This is a stupid long-term tradition of the Ministry of Defense and the military-industrial complex of Russia to boast of the latest developments that have not yet entered the troops, but have not been mastered by production ..
  16. 0
    13 July 2023 02: 35
    Quote: Bad_gr
    Quote from: Alex_mech
    Is it possible to bring the scheme to the use of SOLID fuel in a ramjet?
    We are armed with rockets, where the accelerating powder accelerator is located inside the combustion chamber of the main engine. After the solid fuel burns out, the residues are ejected and the main engine starts to work. Due to this layout, the rocket turned out to be compact. I don’t remember the name of the rocket, but this is not an aircraft version (it seems to be a ship version).

    The first such rocket with a solid-propellant ramjet was made back in the early 60s by the 3M9 rocket of the Kub complex. It is still in service in some places, and the Indians are releasing its clone.
  17. 0
    26 August 2023 20: 27
    Quote from russianreactor
    I will explain to the local public why the X-50 missile is strategically important to us in mantras "rockets never end".

    In fact, Ukrainians are also running out of air defense missiles. Analysts usually estimate the stock of our cruise missiles at 25% from the beginning of the NWO. We still have quite a few Iskanders, because they are cherished for the "general battle" and the Iskanders just know how to bring down bridges, because. unlike other missiles, this is one of their direct purposes. To destroy the bridge, Iskander is given the optical head of the "Radar", which allows you to hit the bridge very accurately and detonate in time. We still have more than 500 Iskanders, but the problem is that only 50 of them are made a year. Therefore, it is not for pounding the table with the fist, for banging on the lid of the coffin.

    A huge problem in the production of Calibers is the expensive and complex turbojet engine TRDD-50. The volume of their production is incomprehensible, because. Saturn set up 2 stands and probably just steals turbine blades from decommissioned USSR engines. How it turns out to do this is a question, but the turbofan engine-50 is not a heavily modified descendant of the ancient Soviet cruise missile engines.



    According to rumors, the X-50 is equipped with a ramjet engine
    Scramjet engines do not have any blades or compressors. As well as moving parts. After acceleration to the desired speed by the carrier, the rocket flies simply by compressing the oncoming flow.

    Works as per the diagram below. As you might guess, direct-flow ones are much cheaper than turbojet ones and can even use solid fuel. Their production volume can definitely be much higher.

    Plus, ramjet engines, that if a turbojet "suffocates" in the stratosphere, then ramjet engines usually work well at high altitude. Therefore, it is sometimes possible to fly above the ceiling of most air defenses at 22-25 km.



    It's a game changer, definitely. Most likely, Caliber firing will soon become a thing of the past due to a shortage of engines.

    A good question is why do we need our fleet then, if it cannot launch the X-50, the rocket needs to be launched at flight speed right away, but Calibers will be in short supply

    I don’t understand what prevents the production of blades from heat-resistant steel, especially since this is a one-time use. And with a direct-flow, yes, it seems to be cheaper at first glance, but it’s very expensive to adjust, it’s hard to produce them, or rather, production must be accurate. According to rumors, all supersonic rockets use direct-flow engines and the composition of the fuel is special, high-calorie.