For different tasks and purposes: warheads of Iskander OTRK missiles

40
For different tasks and purposes: warheads of Iskander OTRK missiles
Loading ballistic missile 9M723 on the launcher


The 9K720 Iskander operational-tactical missile system and its modifications are distinguished by their wide combat capabilities and high performance characteristics. The overall potential of these OTRKs is positively affected by the presence of several types of missiles with different features and parameters. In addition, a wide range of combat units of different classes, including special ones, has been developed for missiles.



Warhead carriers


The development of a promising OTRK, which later received the name Iskander and the GRAU 9K720 index, began at the Design Bureau of Mechanical Engineering (Kolomna) in the second half of the eighties. After the completion of work on the first version of the complex, the creation of new modifications began. According to known data, the development of Iskanders through the introduction of new components and functions continues to this day.

In the course of the consistent development of the OTRK 9K720 and its variants, it became possible to use three different types of missiles. They belong to different classes of weapons and radically differ from each other in design. At the same time, the use of missiles from a common launcher is ensured, and close combat qualities are also achieved.


Iskander before launch

The first in the Iskander family was the 9M723 ballistic (quasi-ballistic) missile. This is a solid propellant single-stage ammunition with a length of approx. 7,3 m with a launch weight of 3,8 tons. Serial missiles available to the troops are equipped with a control system based on inertial and satellite navigation. Other controls have also been developed, incl. full-fledged homing heads for independent search and hitting a target.

Early versions of the 9M723 missiles had a range of about 300 km. In the future, this parameter was brought to 400 km or more. Thus, in foreign sources, the range of a ballistic missile is estimated at 450-480 km.

As part of the Iskander-K project, the complex got the opportunity to use the 9M728 or R-500 cruise missile. This is a product of a traditional layout with a solid-fuel starting and turbojet propulsion engine. The cruise missile is similar in length to the 9M723 ballistic missile, but has a much smaller diameter. The weight parameters are unknown. In flight, the R-500 rocket develops a high subsonic speed. The maximum flight range reaches 500 km.

The upgraded Iskander-M OTRK also received the 9M729 cruise missile. Outwardly, it is similar to the 9M728 product, but its design could be based on a different domestic development. 9M729 is also subsonic and has a flight range of about 480 km. At the same time, foreign officials and bodies spoke about exceeding the threshold of 500 km and violating the existing international agreement.


Launch of a ballistic missile

On a ballistic trajectory


The 9M723 ballistic missile can carry a payload of up to 480 kg. A number of its modifications have similar characteristics, incl. with other combat equipment. As part of the Iskander-M project, the rocket underwent a deep modernization, as a result of which its launch weight exceeded 4,6 tons, and the combat load could reach 700-800 kg.

The main variant of combat equipment, compatible with any modifications of missiles, is a monoblock high-explosive fragmentation charge. With its help, the complex can hit troops in positions or in places of deployment, various structures, incl. protected and other stationary targets with known coordinates.

It is known about, at a minimum, the development of other conventional warheads for the Iskander. So, a rocket can carry a high-explosive incendiary charge - a monoblock of the maximum possible mass. A penetrating warhead with a hardened hull is designed to defeat protected targets.

Several variants of the cluster warhead were developed, and some of them successfully reached adoption. According to known data, 9M723 series missiles with a cassette can carry high-explosive fragmentation, cumulative fragmentation and self-aiming anti-tank warheads. The warhead can hold up to several dozen submunitions, depending on their type.


Installation receives R-500 missiles

Iskander missiles can be a means of delivering a tactical nuclear warhead. A special warhead for 9M723 products should not differ in size and weight from conventional ones. The charge power, according to various sources, is from 5 to 50 kt. Perhaps the ammunition has a variable power.

Winged Opportunities


The 9M728 cruise missile for Iskander-K, despite its smaller size, received similar combat equipment. According to known data, it carries a high-explosive fragmentation warhead in the form of a monoblock weighing 480 kg. Functions and capabilities are similar to the main warhead for the ballistic 9M723.

The possibility of equipping the 9M728 cruise missile with other warheads has not yet been reported. At the same time, the dimensions of the product fully allow the possibility of creating and implementing different equipment options.

The 9M729 product in its design should differ significantly from the standard Iskander-K rocket, but has similar dimensions and weight. This suggests that its combat load is at the same level and does not exceed 480-500 kg. The type of combat equipment for 9M729 was not disclosed. There are assumptions about the use of both nuclear and conventional warheads. In addition, it can be assumed that the missile has a certain potential for modernization in the context of combat capabilities.


Deployment in position

Components of potential


The missile systems of the Iskander family include various means and products with different functions. OTRK includes a self-propelled launcher, unified controls, auxiliary equipment, etc. In addition, three missiles with different characteristics have been developed for these systems, as well as a number of their modifications. Part of the ammunition with certain features has been adopted.

The characteristic advantages of the Iskander OTRK of various modifications include the possibility of using all compatible missiles from a single launcher. At the same time, she carries two ammunition and in all cases uses a standard control system. Supplementing the OTRK with other means when introducing a new missile is actually not required.

"Iskanders" are intended to destroy various ground targets in the operational-tactical rear of the enemy. Depending on the state and capabilities of the enemy air defense missile defense system and other factors, the OTRK can solve such problems using a quasi-ballistic or cruise missile. The choice of the optimal ammunition allows you to increase the likelihood of a successful breakthrough of the defense and hitting the target.

Given the type and characteristics of the target, you can choose the method of guidance and warhead. So, stationary structures and buildings are effectively hit by a "normal" high-explosive fragmentation warhead of a large mass, and for more complex targets, a penetrating warhead is used. "Iskander" can also hit area targets - due to submunitions in cassettes. For special tasks, a special warhead has been developed.


Cruise missile in flight

The high efficiency of the Iskander OTRK with different ammunition has been repeatedly demonstrated during various exercises. Since February 2022, the complexes have been showing their capabilities during a real military operation. At least hundreds of missiles have already been used, and a corresponding number of targets have been hit. Apparently, different types of products with different warheads are used, which makes it possible to reliably destroy the intended target.

A vital role


OTRK of the Iskander family is a modern and effective strike weapon capable of solving a wide range of combat missions and hitting distant targets behind enemy lines. The high efficiency of the complex is largely based on the presence of a wide range of missiles with different tactical, technical and combat characteristics.

It should be noted that it was the development of new missiles with certain features in the past that was the main method for developing and improving the complex as a whole. It can be expected that the current stages of modernization of the Iskander will not be the last. And in the following projects, promising missiles with certain advantages will be created again.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    April 12 2023 04: 04
    I think everyone is worried about Iskander's ability to destroy bridges. The optical seeker is there as an option. There are no issues with accuracy. Is 500 kg + kinetic energy enough to collapse the span? In a reinforced concrete bridge, if it breaks the reinforcement, the span will collapse on its own. With a metal bridge and the main bridge on farms, like most railways, the question is.
    1. +2
      April 12 2023 04: 20
      Flights are quickly restored. You have to hit the pillars. They are concrete.
      1. +1
        April 12 2023 05: 00
        Quote: Andrey Moskvin
        They are concrete.

        And whether the power of the Iskander OTRK is enough for their lethal damage, that is the question.
        1. +1
          April 12 2023 06: 15
          That's why I reminded. We need concrete-piercing warheads, but those that can cope with the supports are unlikely to fit in the Iskander.
          1. 0
            April 13 2023 14: 56
            Quote: Andrey Moskvin
            We need concrete-piercing warheads, but those that can cope with the supports are unlikely to fit in the Iskander.

            If there is a warhead in the declared 700 - 800 kg. (reinforced) yes with cumulative precharges, but not one, but two, or even three, then you can ruin the bull. Even a single solid bull.
            And in order to bring down the canvas, one is enough, but with an explosion of 0,5 - 1 m above the canvas. Break through.
            The problem is that no one even wants to try it.
            And if they knock out several bridges on the memory, then NATO deliveries will not reach Kyiv either.
            Agreements.
      2. +13
        April 12 2023 06: 14
        As a builder, I note that you are deeply mistaken. Relatively quickly, it is possible to restore a short span from metal structures and only for a road bridge. This can be seen on the example of the Kerch bridge, but the spans there are quite short. If the navigable span were blown up, then its restoration would take 6-8 months at best. From the length of the span, the technical complexity increases sharply.

        Also, the example of the Kerch bridge shows the sensitivity of railway spans to deformation. Although there the railway span looks intact, but in fact it is fatally damaged and is also changing. Railroad bridges are sturdier, but also more capricious of even minor damage. Where the car passes, the train is already unsafe to use.

        To break the supports themselves is a task close to impossible, as it seems to me. They usually differ from hydrotechnical concrete on crushed stone and hardened rebar. The supports of the Kerch bridge are designed for a 10 magnitude earthquake. Energy comparable to a nuclear strike.

        In fact, there are no industrial technologies for their destruction for high-strength massive concrete structures. Therefore, Hitler's anti-aircraft towers in Vienna are still standing. It is not clear how to demolish them technologically
        1. +1
          April 12 2023 12: 52
          Here, Betab is more likely to be suitable for damaging the runway .... but each with a correction and a control center for each individual. with a step of 20-50m along the span. The Americans have corr ammunition in 50-100kg. You can put these through 50m across the bridge .... let me remind you that the F15 can carry 22 of these. Himars 220mm fits 1 pc. Theoretically, you can take ATAKMS 600mm and attach 3 pieces to one rocket there. Its range is 300 km and each bomb has a plus of 50 km. Here is the launch of 3-4 launchers for one missile (3 pieces each). So you get the arrival of 9-12 bombs
        2. -1
          April 18 2023 18: 05
          Quote from russianreactor
          In fact, there are no industrial technologies for their destruction for high-strength massive concrete structures. Therefore, Hitler's anti-aircraft towers in Vienna are still standing.

          You are wrong. Thousands of destroyed bridges and dams, as well as Hitler's bunkers and fortifications in Köning or the Mannerheim Line are an example of this. There is no defense against the correct application of a directional blast point. It burns, cuts, splits reinforced concrete consisting almost of steel reinforcement with a small addition of concrete filling voids in reinforcement bundles. When I was studying at the military department, I passed a test on one of the topics where the task of calculating the required amount of TNT for cutting the cable of the Golden Gate Bridge in Los Angeles was proposed. NMNIP counted something a little more than a hundred kg. Submitted the report.
          And the air defense towers are not destroyed because of the memory of the war, and I suspect that there is still an unadvertised main reason - the towers have not lost their air defense significance, instead of Oerlikons they will put Bofors.
      3. +2
        April 12 2023 07: 54
        Flights recover quickly

        What's stopping you from doing it again?
        You have to hit the supports

        For their fatal damage, something much more than 500 kg in FC plus kinetics is needed.
    2. 0
      April 12 2023 12: 49
      I think everyone is worried about Iskander's ability to destroy bridges. The optical seeker is there as an option. There are no issues with accuracy. Is 500 kg + kinetic energy enough to collapse the span? In a reinforced concrete bridge, if it breaks the reinforcement, the span will collapse on its own. With a metal bridge and the main bridge on farms, like most railways, the question is.

      The use of CR makes sense only with Special warheads or for super-important targets, such as ships, command posts. Otherwise, the price / quality is none.

      For comparison:
      In the "Caliber" 3M-14E, the weight of the warhead is 450 kg, in the Luftwaffe SC 500 air bomb - 180 kg.
      One "Caliber" = 3 FAB SC500.
      There are 48 missiles in the Iskander complex = 144 FAB.

      Total Iskander's full work \u40d daytime work of the group (regiment of 50-3 aircraft) Pieces with 4-XNUMX sorties per day (which is realistic).

      Now consider the cost...
    3. -2
      April 12 2023 18: 39
      1. For strikes on bridges and other communications, an iron will is needed, which is not there. 2. We don’t hit the bridges, perhaps because of the accuracy of the OTRK, the bridge works in Zatoka and the Iskanders did not help. You can spend 10-20 missiles for the joy of Ukraine. With the Aerospace Forces, the same problems, and the bridges are blocked by air defense! They could have hit, otherwise how to understand the sacrifices that our guys are making. It turns out let the bridges stand, and the guys and civilians die. 3. A priceless agreement is quite possible, we do not hit bridges, and the Armed Forces of Ukraine do not hit Belgorod, although they can even level it with the ground like Donetsk. From Kharkov there is nothing for Khaimarsov and others. Who has any thoughts ???
      1. 0
        April 13 2023 10: 55
        Quote: Sid2014
        They could have hit, otherwise how to understand the sacrifices that our guys are making. It turns out let the bridges stand, and the guys and civilians die.


        The sacrifices are not in vain, of course.
        If you do not understand the meaning of what is happening, this does not mean that there is no meaning.

        I can assume that now there is a war going on not only for Ukraine, but also for the EU.

        In fact, the war is not with Ukraine, but with the dollar and American control of the global Internet, which gave rise to ukrofascism.

        Russia does not need a Pyrrhic victory, as a result of which 20-30 million citizens will appear within the framework of the Union State, dreaming of secession, joining the EU and NATO.

        An important fact can follow from Macaron's recent demarche:
        French capital (behind which the Rothschild clan is traditionally seen)
        does not want to become an appendage of US capital.
        German capital does not want this either. There is also hidden discontent there, although it has not yet come out openly.

        The United States, seeing this danger to itself, is constantly creating a wave of discontent in France in order to demolish the local elite and replace it with one under its control.

        Russia, in fact, is waging a conventional war with NATO.
        Its main goal may extend much further than Ukraine.

        As a result, it may turn out that the EU countries will stop supporting the American world, will refuse unfavorable sanctions and expensive energy resources.

        To help this, Russia may try to crush everything
        that NATO is able to send today to Ukraine.

        Over the very bridges that you demand to destroy...
    4. +1
      April 13 2023 10: 04
      Quote from russianreactor
      I think everyone is worried about Iskander's ability to destroy bridges.


      I think this is not the question that should concern us.
  2. -5
    April 12 2023 04: 23
    Quote from russianreactor
    . There are no issues with accuracy.

    As far as accuracy, there are a lot of questions.
    Everyone has already seen how accurate the hymers are, but we still don’t know how accurate the iskanders are.
    1. +6
      April 12 2023 05: 00
      Quote: certero
      But we still don’t know how accurate the Iskanders are.

      Very accurate, Ukrainians have already felt and appreciated it
    2. KCA
      +1
      April 12 2023 06: 27
      The rhinoceros has very poor eyesight, but with its mass and speed, it does not matter
  3. +1
    April 12 2023 04: 27
    Everything seems to be fine and the range and weight of the warhead and accuracy. And where are the results of the application? Hymers both flew and fly. The fuel has been delivered as it is, the light is in every window in Ukraine. Progress is measured in meters. The air defense of Ukraine is only getting stronger. Five lines of defense have already been written on this site. Thunder-2 has already been put into series. Any warehouse, warehouse, building with a flat roof, any gas station must be destroyed soldier
    1. -1
      April 12 2023 13: 22
      Quote: V.
      The air defense of Ukraine is only getting stronger.

      Uh, for what exactly? Is it due to stingers? Or these ones like them ... well, German with guns, baked in the 60s ...
      Let me remind you that from the USSR, Ukraine got air defense at the level of a strategic area. More than 300 S-300 launchers and a damn abyss of Bukov. Plus any military "trifle" in the states of 3 military districts. Who and what is capable of strengthening IT in Europe? Statesmen with their crooked crafts? (I note that they are crooked not because the shtatovtsy do not know how, but because they do not need to.)

      Quote: V.
      Hymers both flew and fly.


      Do you propose to shoot down Hymars missiles with Iskander missiles? Original solution. :) For reference, OTRK Iskander was developed and serves to destroy FIXED objects or accumulations of living sire and equipment.

      Quote: V.
      Thunder-2 has already been put into series.

      Who told you this? So far, even from that side, they are not talking about the series. In reality, there was only one launch. And was successfully intercepted.
  4. -1
    April 12 2023 04: 59
    At the same time, foreign officials and bodies spoke about exceeding the threshold of 500 km and violating the existing international agreement.
    Their space reconnaissance spotted the moment of testing when this rocket was able to fly more than 500 km.
    1. +1
      April 12 2023 13: 12
      Quote: svp67
      Their space reconnaissance spotted the moment of testing when this rocket was able to fly more than 500 km.


      No. They they saidthat their intelligence detected something. At the same time, the rocket, according to them, did not fly, but could fly more than 500 km, judging by the trajectory. Lie. The rocket was developed strictly within the framework of the contract; this was a fundamental condition for the allocation of funding.
      And do you still believe the US statements about their intelligence data? Didn't "Powell's test tube" or "satellite images of the Malaysian Boeing" teach you anything? Well, then I won’t even dare to reveal to you a terrible secret about their New Year’s grandfather in a red caftan ... :)
  5. 0
    April 12 2023 05: 50
    In the future, we need an OTRK with a range of 2000 km.
    1. 0
      April 12 2023 10: 57
      Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
      In the future, we need an OTRK with a range of 2000 km.

      Today, ours tested a rocket that was able to fly about 3000 km
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        April 15 2023 08: 43
        Well, this isn't the first time a rocket has flown exactly that route. Even when the treaty banning medium-range missiles was in effect. And these tests were also officially reported.
        And in 2013, and in 2014, and later.
    2. 0
      April 12 2023 15: 25
      Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
      In the future, we need an OTRK with a range of 2000 km.

      Easily. "Caliber" put on Kamaz - and go
    3. 0
      April 12 2023 20: 29
      This will be the MRBM and not the OTRK ..............................................
      1. 0
        April 15 2023 08: 40
        The caliber is a cruise missile, so it cannot be an IRBM ... except perhaps a KRSD.
  6. 0
    April 12 2023 05: 58
    future projects will again create promising missiles with certain advantages.
    It's good when a weapon is created with the prospect of modernizing it in terms of combat characteristics. Well, the conclusion can be made simple - more accurate and powerful missiles with visual results of their use against the enemy.
  7. +1
    April 12 2023 09: 42
    "Iskander" should simply become a platform for the creation of medium-range missile systems! I think this work is already underway. The situation demands!
  8. 0
    April 12 2023 10: 46
    Quote: svp67
    Very accurate, Ukrainians have already felt and appreciated it

    I don't know if they felt something.
    With the capabilities that are described about the Iskanders, the enemy should not have a single command post, not a single warehouse, not a single fuel and lubricants concentration point behind the front line at a distance of 300 km. We just mirror the situation when the Hummers forced the Russian army to withdraw warehouses 60-70 km from the line of contact.
    However, this is not the case. So, most likely, the accuracy to the Hammers does not hold out, alas.
    1. 0
      April 12 2023 10: 59
      Quote: certero
      With the capabilities that are described about the Iskanders, the enemy should not have a single command post, not a single warehouse, not a single fuel and lubricants concentration point behind the front line at a distance of 300 km.

      These questions are not for the Iskanders, but for our intelligence. Rather, to its equipment.
      Quote: certero
      when the Hammers forced the Russian army to withdraw warehouses 60-70 km from the line of contact.

      Not to push back, but to be able to disperse and mask ... And this is a different skill. The number of such "mini-arsenals" exceeds the total number of "Hamers"
    2. 0
      April 12 2023 15: 29
      Quote: certero
      We just mirror the situation when the Hummers forced the Russian army to withdraw warehouses 60-70 km from the line of contact.
      However, this is not the case. So, most likely, the accuracy to the Hammers does not hold out, alas.

      In any case, the Chimeras were able to gouge the Antonovsky bridge, which forced Surovikin to "make difficult decisions." As a result of which our troops draped from Kherson, burying the hope for the liberation of the Black Sea region. But our cool Iskanders cannot hit any bridge in any way, in order to at least damage it.
  9. 0
    April 12 2023 13: 00
    In view of the mass character of targets for a BR with a conventional warhead, a "simple" BR with GLONASS guidance is needed in the dimensions of the main one. The ode will be cheaper, it will fly along the usual trajectory, without problems. But the industry will be able to make many such missiles. And not for all purposes, options such as overcoming missile defense and AGSN are needed. Following the example of the United States, one can also consider mounting small-diameter winged bombs (with wings) on the booster block BR ​​3-4.
  10. 0
    April 12 2023 13: 06
    The serial missiles available to the troops are equipped with a control system based on inertial and satellite navigation. Other controls have also been developed, incl. full-fledged homing heads for independent search and hitting a target.

    Yes? How interesting :)

    Early versions of the 9M723 missiles had a range of about 300 km. In the future, this parameter was brought to 400 km or more. Thus, in foreign sources, the range of a ballistic missile is estimated at 450-480 km.

    Oh :)

    See the thing on the back of the car? Doesn't it remind you of anything? The Oka complex is shortened by Gorbach to please the shtatovites. Here, on the basis of this system, due to the improvement of the rocket, a launcher for 2 ammunition was designed. Which became the basis for Iskander. The range at the Oka is 400 km ... I doubt that Invincible lowered it by 100 km :)

    in foreign sources, the range of a ballistic missile is estimated at 450-480 km.

    As eyewitnesses said, Invincible made the complex literally to spite Gorbach. His authority in military circles was so great that he could receive funding for development even without the consent of the Secretary General. And the data of foreign sources, for some reason, seems more realistic to me :)

    9M729 ... At the same time, foreign officials and authorities spoke about exceeding the threshold of 500 km and violating the existing international agreement.

    Lie. The missile was developed strictly within the framework of the INF Treaty. Otherwise, they simply would not have given money to her. Then it was essential.

    Product 9M729 by its design must differ significantly from the standard missile "Iskander-K", but has similar dimensions and bulk.


    Why all of a sudden? A regular rocket is supersonic and maneuvers throughout the trajectory without wings. And winged subsonic and ... winged :) Why should she be the same in mass?

    The characteristic advantages of the Iskander OTRK of various modifications include the possibility of using all compatible missiles from a single launcher. At the same time, she carries two ammunition and in all cases uses a standard control system. Supplementing the OTRK with other means when introducing a new missile is actually not required.


    Oh-2. :) That's it characteristic advantage of the complex?
    1. 0
      April 12 2023 13: 47
      It probably happened by accident. In the press, they also write that the "Dagger" was originally conceived as part of the Iskander complex.
  11. 0
    April 12 2023 15: 55
    Quote from russianreactor
    I think everyone is worried about Iskander's ability to destroy bridges.

    Of decisive importance to the destruction of bridges is a rare illusion, just as the destruction of an electrically carrying system was.
    The stationary bridge can easily be replaced by a temporary bridge or a cable car.
  12. +1
    April 12 2023 20: 28
    Quote: Sid2014
    3. A priceless agreement is quite possible, we do not hit bridges, and the Armed Forces of Ukraine do not hit Belgorod, although they can even level it with the ground like Donetsk. From Kharkov there is nothing for Khaimarsov and others. Who has any thoughts ???

    1) Not cynical but cynical.
    2) I don’t see anything cynical in such an agreement - Hitler did not use his chemical weapons, because he knew that they would not be used in Germany either. Agreement?
    3) Here, many are outraged - why don't we demolish the government quarter in Kyiv (Kyiv or Lvov entirely)? A question from the same series - think about, for example, Kaliningrad, Transnistria. They are completely surrounded by enemies, but for some reason they are still not touched.
  13. 0
    April 13 2023 13: 15
    It is technically possible to increase the range by more than 500 km. What now stops from this step?
  14. 0
    April 13 2023 23: 32
    To effectively destroy bridges, you need a long warhead with a cumulative funnel, which will form a sideways flat cumulative jet several meters wide and "cut" spans or supports.
    1. 0
      April 15 2023 10: 56
      Restoration of bridges requires the technology of their construction. It's not about small bridges.
      And how many new bridges have been built in Ukraine during the years of independence? Are there enterprises in Ukraine that specialize in this? Are there any experts left?
      Well, the specialists may be European, but it is very problematic to deliver new flights from Europe through a warring country.
  15. 0
    April 18 2023 18: 14
    Quote: Sid2014
    but Zatoka works and the Iskanders did not help.

    Caliber hit the railway bridge, and there the weight of the ammunition is not large and the accuracy for the areas (get into the hangar or workshop) Hitting the Caliber into the span of the bridge is already an accidental luck +/- 5 meters. FAB accuracy. But the fab has up to 1,5 tons of hexogen, even if he misses the shock wave, the business will do that he will have to change a lot of things.