XM1155-SC artillery projectile with increased firing range is being tested in the USA

40
XM1155-SC artillery projectile with increased firing range is being tested in the USA
Experienced projectile XM1155-SC SCALPEL after leaving the barrel


In the United States, the development of a promising family of long-range ERCA artillery pieces and ammunition for them continues. As part of the XM1155-SC project, BAE Systems is creating a new high-precision projectile with high flight speed and increased firing range. Recently, the first tests of such ammunition took place, and their results are in line with expectations, which allows us to continue work.



Latest news


On March 29, the development company BAE Systems announced the first shot with a promising projectile. The official press release provides basic information about the event and the types of weapons used. Also attached to it was a photograph of the projectile in the first moments of the flight, which was allowed for open publication.

It is reported that an experienced sub-caliber projectile for the XM1155-SC program was made according to the concept from BAE Systems, known as the Sub-Caliber Artillery Long-Range Projectile with Enhanced Lethality (SCALPEL). The tests were organized by the development company and the relevant structures of the ground forces. Shooting was performed at the White Sands range (Piece of New Mexico).

The first shot with a new projectile was fired from an experimental long-range XM907A2 gun with a caliber of 155 mm and a barrel length of 58 klb. Shooting was carried out at a fixed target, and the projectile successfully hit it. The range of the shot is not reported. At the same time, the developers note that it exceeded the maximum range obtained when firing other ammunition from the same gun.


Advertisement for Sub-Caliber Artillery Long-Range Projectile with Enhanced Lethality concept

The development company highly appreciated the test. In practice, it was shown that the new projectile really has a long range and is capable of hitting a target with known coordinates with high accuracy. In the course of further development of the project, it is planned to further increase the firing range, as well as to create and implement a homing head with a target search function.

The design parameters of the next version of the SCALPEL product have not yet been specified. However, it is clear that in terms of key characteristics, in any case, it will surpass the current nomenclature of 155-mm shells of the US Army. However, the timing of the appearance of a full-fledged ammunition suitable for adoption is still unknown. The same applies to the completion of the development of systems of the ERCA family.

Hypervelocity family


Over the past few years, BAE Systems, with the participation of the US Army and other organizations, has been developing a promising line of Hypervelocity Projectile (HVP) artillery ammunition. The goal of the program is to create a range of shots in the main calibers of the US armed forces with enhanced combat qualities. The range in comparison with existing unguided and guided projectiles should increase significantly; high accuracy is required.

First of all, a variant of the HVP projectile for 155-mm field artillery was developed. All components of a promising artillery shot with enhanced performance were developed and tested. During testing of one of the versions of such ammunition, a range of 110 km was obtained with high accuracy. HVP developments formed the basis of the XM1155 project, which was successfully brought to testing.


Principles of using XM1155 projectiles

Then BAE Systems, on its own initiative, proposed the SCALPEL concept, which planned to increase the firing range. Now it has been fully implemented in the XM1155-SC (Sub-Caliber) project and brought to the test. In the near future, such a projectile will pass the necessary checks, and the army will determine its prospects.

Design features


BAE Systems has not yet shown a new version of the XM1155-SC projectile. Only one photo from the tests has been published, in which the lead device almost completely hides the projectile itself. Also, there is advertising graphics, the plausibility of which is questionable. The bulk of the technical details and characteristics also remain unknown. Nevertheless, it is possible to imagine in general terms what the developer company offers to the customer.

Apparently, the XM1155-SC projectile is similar in appearance and design to previous developments of the HVP series. Similar structural elements and layout solutions should be used. It is also possible to use a unified master device. At the same time, the internal equipment of the latest projectile and the propellant charge had to be developed specifically for it, taking into account the required characteristics.

The shot with the SCALPEL projectile is designed for 155 mm caliber guns. At the same time, the projectile itself is designated as sub-caliber and has a smaller diameter. The declared caliber may correspond to the span of the tail rudders. Like other sub-caliber projectiles, the XM1155-SC is equipped with a multi-element resettable master device.


Experienced self-propelled guns XM1299 with the XM907 gun on trials

The available images show a projectile with an ogival hull. Only its tail section has a cylindrical shape, on which X-shaped rudders are placed. The main part of the body is given under the warhead. The nose cone can be transparent to radio waves or laser radiation to ensure the operation of the seeker. Controls are placed in the tail.

Also at the bottom of the hull is a solid-fuel engine for extra acceleration. The active-reactive launch principle using a long-barreled gun should provide high, up to hypersonic, speed both when exiting the barrel and on the trajectory. Among other things, this will provide a reduction in flight time and increase the likelihood of successfully hitting the target.

In the original version for firing at fixed targets, the XM1155-SC must have a guidance system based on satellite and / or inertial navigation. In the future, they want to create a GOS with the ability to independently search for a target. It can be radar, infrared or passive laser.

Higher requirements for strength and stability are imposed on the guidance heads and controls for long-range projectiles. When fired from a long-barreled gun, incl. with the use of a gas generator / engine, projectile parts are subjected to increased overloads. It is necessary to protect them from damage and ensure their performance under all expected conditions.


SAU XM1299 (in the background) and upgraded M109

To use the new projectile, a minor modification of the fire control systems on compatible guns will be required. Their software must receive data and algorithms that will allow them to use XM1155-SC or other new ammunition and fire confidently over the entire range. In addition, in the course of the introduction of such ammunition in the troops, it will be necessary to improve the existing reconnaissance and strike circuits in accordance with the increase in the firing range.

Reason for optimism


The US Army and contractor companies regularly talk about their successes in the field of long-range artillery. Currently, a number of projects are being developed in this direction, and some of them are already entering the finish line. In the near future, the adoption of the first samples of the ERCA family is expected, after which the deployment of these systems in the troops will begin.

Other projects are still at earlier stages. Thus, the development of the long-range 155-mm projectile XM1155-SC is far from complete. BAE Systems and the customer have recently completed the design of such ammunition and are only now beginning to test it. It will take some time to carry out the necessary checks, and a large number of experienced projectiles will be needed.

Testing and fine-tuning the XM1155-SC SCALPEL product can take several years. The project uses some ready-made developments, which somewhat simplified its development, but a significant acceleration of work and overall success are not yet guaranteed.

However, the US Army and developers of new artillery systems are already making plans for the future. Their optimism is built on the recent successes of the ERCA program and related developments. Whether it will be preserved in the future, and whether it will be possible to fulfill the current plans, time will tell.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -5
    April 7 2023 04: 31
    Accuracy and range are cool, but what will be left of the power of the projectile at the target? After all, the diameter is reduced, and the control equipment, taking into account the requirements for strength, will take up some space, and the engine will not add space. And the words below, about compatibility with the propellant charges of existing guns, make it clear that the weight of the projectile is noticeably reduced, so that the extension of the space for explosives will not add.
    The test used an army-designed sabot package for the sub-caliber round, confirming its compatibility with the 155mm cannon and propelling charges.
    Well, the counteraction of GPS will sharply reduce the accuracy, equal, for example, to Excalibur, 4 m, ideally.
    1. -4
      April 7 2023 04: 43
      There will be fluff. A purely advertising campaign, such as "hypersonic weapons", where every word in brackets - hypersound from Mach 5 is just beginning. and they rejoice that they finally reached 5, and the targets hit by ARRW are already officially defined as strictly fixed and necessarily unprotected (soft). Well, why the devil is hypersound if he is not able to destroy even the ZKP? laughing But hypersound!
      So here - ultra-long range, the price is like that of Zyama, 900 thousand per shot, a dart from a darts flies to the target. But with dancing - as much as 79 km !!!
      tfu you idiots
      1. +12
        April 7 2023 07: 12
        Quote from Bingo
        Well, why the devil is hypersound if he is not able to destroy even the ZKP? laughing But hypersound!


        You can, for example, fire at UAV and helicopter field airfields, fuel and ammunition depots, at air defense and ships - just the cost is justified by the price of a burned-out air defense warehouse or complex, a factory or a repair base with equipment under repair.
        1. -1
          April 7 2023 07: 43
          The ship is a mobile, protected target, there are no UAV field airfields in nature, there is an operator, for example, a warehouse is a protected target, if not civilian. Although, of course, there are exceptions.
          1. +8
            April 7 2023 09: 14
            We probably didn’t have any shelters at the airfields, and are not expected in the foreseeable future. The price of a projectile is in any way less than the price of a modern combat aircraft
            1. -3
              April 7 2023 10: 23
              Quote: Eskobar
              We probably didn’t have any shelters at the airfields, and are not expected in the foreseeable future. The price of a projectile is in any way less than the price of a modern combat aircraft

              Airfield 110 km from LBS? Even the heliports are a little further away, in my opinion. Yes, and 155 mm artillery is also not located near the trenches.
          2. +3
            April 7 2023 18: 21
            Quote from Bingo
            The ship is a mobile, protected target, there are no UAV field airfields in nature


            The ships will be included in the list of targets already at the next stage - they also want to make a seeker for the projectile there, and if the accuracy is decent, then such projectiles will be able to fly directly into the engine room through chimneys, damage control, missile silo covers, etc.
            And UAV airfields will definitely be in the future - as soon as their number exceeds a certain limit, it will be necessary to make such airfields.
            And, again, they want to increase the range even more and, apparently, they will be able to.
        2. -4
          April 7 2023 08: 15
          You can, for example, fire at UAV and helicopter field airfields, fuel and ammunition depots, air defense and ships
          But what, missiles for these purposes have already become ineffective? Another cut of the budget, as on the Zamvolta railgun.
          1. -4
            April 7 2023 09: 13
            and we have self-propelled guns Pion and Malka with a caliber of 203 mm
            active-rocket firing range 47 km
            a niche of 100 km and above is occupied by FABs, KABs, UPABs from 500 to 1500 kg of RDX
            well, the edge of the OTRK Iskander with a warhead of 400 kg of RDX
            all the more so, a bunker from bridge concrete will NOT take a 155-mm projectile at a time
            - you need at least 20 hits - and these are grandmothers - don’t go to the grandmother
            1. -1
              April 7 2023 23: 09
              A bunker from bridge concrete will NOT take a 155-mm projectile at a time

              Exactly. That's why you need a caliber of 203 mm
            2. 0
              14 June 2023 18: 28
              About a meter of reinforced concrete will protect against a 155-mm projectile. There were such people on Stalin's line. Machine gun bunker - 150-170 cubes of concrete.
      2. +2
        April 8 2023 06: 44
        Quote from Bingo
        There will be fluff. Pure promotion

        And what do you think, how powerful a "zilch" is needed to bring out the radar of an air defense system or counter-battery combat stations? They are powerless against such a projectile. And then it’s already possible not to deny yourself anything either in missiles or UAVs and aircraft to be afraid only of anti-aircraft artillery and MANPADS ..
    2. +5
      April 7 2023 04: 47
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      Accuracy and range are cool, but what will be left of the power of the projectile at the target?

      Explosives of increased power were invented (up to 300 times higher than the power of TNT) ...
      And such a new projectile is not intended for a wide user ...
      1. +2
        April 7 2023 05: 06
        Quote: ROSS 42
        Explosives of increased power were invented (up to 300 times higher than the power of TNT) ...

        Well, if you think so laughing then of course!:
        So, with the explosion of a kilogram TNT checker, it turns out
        0,6 cu. m of gas
        , and a kilogram of aluminum hydride - about 30 cubic meters. m.

        And metals can explode and burn - the question is in the energy supplied.
      2. +10
        April 7 2023 06: 12
        Quote: ROSS 42
        Explosives of increased power were invented (up to 300 times higher than the power of TNT).

        Quote: ROSS 42
        Explosives of increased power were invented (up to 300 times higher than the power of TNT).

        Maybe I missed something in chemistry? This is 10 kg. "new explosive" is already 3 tons of TNT? So you can give up nuclear weapons! recourse
        1. -5
          April 7 2023 06: 46
          Quote: fa2998
          Maybe I missed something in chemistry? This is 10 kg. "new explosive" is already 3 tons of TNT? So you can give up nuclear weapons!

          It's more like physics: I'm not sure about practice, but there is a theory:

          An electric explosion of solid metal has proven to be very effective. The binding energy of each atom, for example, iron, converted into explosion energy, is about 8 106 J / kg (the well-known explosive TNT is twice as weak). At the same time, the effectiveness of explosives is evaluated not only by energy, but also by power, that is, by the ratio of the energy of the explosion to its duration. Due to the short duration, the power of a metal explosion is hundreds of times greater than that of the same TNT.


          For more details see: https://www.nkj.ru/archive/articles/4072/ (Science and life, METAL EXPLODES!)
          But where do you get such currents from?
        2. +1
          April 7 2023 09: 17
          Quote: fa2998
          Maybe I missed something in chemistry? This is 10 kg. "new explosive" is already 3 tons of TNT? So you can give up nuclear weapons!

          The power of the munition, in which aluminum hydride (aluminum saturated with hydrogen) is used as an explosive (HE), is from 30 to 300 times higher than the power of the munition with the same amount of trinitrotoluene (TNT).

          https://www.arms-expo.ru/analytics/perspektivnye-razrabotki/vzryvayushchiysya-metall-kotoryy-v-razy-moshchnee-trotila/
          It's a little expensive ... I remember that somehow the Kazakhs managed to get explosives whose power is 1000 times higher than trinitrotoluene. It seems to be a fake message, but the comparison was interesting: a match head and a grenade...
          1. -1
            April 7 2023 23: 07
            Quote: ROSS 42
            I remember that somehow the Kazakhs managed to get explosives whose power is 1000 times higher than trinitrotoluene.

            laughing

            Quote: ROSS 42
            I think it's a fake message

            good
        3. -1
          April 7 2023 23: 08
          Quote: fa2998
          Maybe I missed something in chemistry?

          1 April.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. -1
        April 7 2023 23: 06
        Quote: ROSS 42
        Explosives of increased power were invented (up to 300 times higher than the power of TNT) ...

        wassat
      5. +1
        April 7 2023 23: 12
        No one has ever invented such substances. And it will not, there is no such energy in chemical bonds. The limit is 3-4 times more than tola. At an exorbitant price.
      6. 0
        10 May 2023 22: 11
        Yes, these explosives are expensive for mass use. But 300 times ... If it's not difficult, post a link to the source, because so far only the Indian CL-20 is known, which is 60 times more powerful.
      7. 0
        1 June 2023 18: 40
        It's called a nuclear projectile. In chemistry, a growth of 300 is an extremely dubious thing. Is that on metallic hydrogen that they will come up with sometime
    3. 0
      14 June 2023 18: 25
      Perhaps the projectile will be an extension of the projectile in calibers and a new explosive. And it will be at least no worse than cylindrical shells with ogival.
  2. +4
    April 7 2023 09: 23
    Hmm, is there any point in bothering with a sub-caliber projectile? what
    Even a high-explosive of this caliber, when it hits a tank, leaves no chance of salvation. Even if it does not completely disable the tank, then it will definitely have to be sent for repair. The crew, on the other hand, has a minimum chance of surviving at all.
    1. 0
      April 7 2023 10: 13
      Quote: K-50
      Hmm, is there any point in bothering with a sub-caliber projectile?

      Otherwise, with the same propellant charge, there will be no increase in the initial speed, and hence the range, only this way. And the bottom gas generator will not solve this.
      1. +1
        April 7 2023 13: 05
        There are 2 options - 1st sub-caliber projectile, 2nd projectile with ramjet
        1. 0
          April 7 2023 14: 24
          Quote: Zaurbek
          2nd shell with ramjet

          This is not the BAE option, but the Norwegian NAMMO, but there, too, things are not very good with the usable volume. Although BAE may also be working on this option.
    2. -3
      April 7 2023 13: 00
      They fire too rarely at tanks from howitzers. Yes, and getting at such a distance even into a tank that has been standing for a long time is very difficult.
      A homing head in a sub-caliber projectile that flies at tremendous speed...
      Ours were taught to saw by theirs ...
  3. +2
    April 7 2023 13: 04
    All other things being equal, this is a competitor to Hymars. Now compare the weight-cost-weight of explosives with Hymars. But such work must be carried out for existing artillery systems. For example, our Pion with a long barrel and 203mm .... it may well shoot so far with some kind of projectile with a ramjet engine
    1. 0
      April 7 2023 23: 09
      As for me, we need to bring Hermes to 100 km.
      And the accuracy, and the mass of the charge, and there is no barrel wear.
      And the initial flight speed is 1300 - 1500 m / s.
      In addition, the price will be lower than that of this projectile.
      1. +1
        April 11 2023 11: 04
        You need to drink. The United States, due to the large amount of money, is conducting parallel research. Knowledge is never superfluous, and sometimes what is now expensive or works poorly - tomorrow, taking into account new materials and electronics - will work.
  4. -4
    April 7 2023 13: 22
    does not grow together with hypersound, did you decide to blind a new projectile?
  5. -2
    April 7 2023 14: 58
    It is very interesting now that the self-propelled guns will be like an anti-tank gun, and they will shoot at tanks from closed positions while being 30-40 kilometers from the tank being hit. And what is the uranium rod also made of?
    1. 0
      April 11 2023 11: 06
      No, this is a sub-caliber projectile in a howitzer. For example, a 155mm barrel, and a 100mm HE projectile in a "jacket" to increase the initial speed.
  6. +2
    April 7 2023 17: 39
    I want to read something interesting and new. you go into a potential interesting article, and then Ryabov. with regular quotes from news and promotional brochures. should be ashamed of this, sorry, bullshit!
    and what is most interesting - the specifics are simply ZERO! but how many of these pseudo-intelligent turns! wow! IMHO, the level of articles on VO not only fell, but became below all baseboards.
  7. 0
    April 7 2023 22: 59
    Made for sale, not for war...
  8. 0
    April 8 2023 10: 50
    I would like to know if we are working in this area? I know that there is Krasnopol, but it is still of Soviet design. I hope this topic is not abandoned.
  9. -1
    13 June 2023 10: 20
    all mattress developments that begin in enthusiastic screams, chants and dances with tambourines eventually turn out to be just zilch with a grandiose cut of green candy wrappers.
  10. -1
    22 June 2023 13: 48
    So the gas generator or accelerator is in his tail? Things are similar, but very different.