Czech anti-aircraft guns in the air defense of Nazi Germany

46
Czech anti-aircraft guns in the air defense of Nazi Germany

After the annexation of Czechoslovakia, more than 500 anti-aircraft guns of small and medium caliber were at the disposal of the German army. Subsequently weapons the factories of the Reich Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia produced several thousand guns that were used by the armed forces of Nazi Germany and supplied to the satellite countries.

Small-caliber anti-aircraft artillery


The first rapid-fire anti-aircraft guns appeared in the Czechoslovak army shortly after its formation - in 1919. These were 20-mm Becker automatic guns (according to Czechoslovakian terminology - heavy machine guns), purchased in the amount of 47 units in Germany. Together with them, they bought 250 thousand shots.



The prototype of a 20 mm automatic gun chambered for 20x70 mm, designed by Reinhold Becker, appeared as early as 1914. The principle of operation of automation was based on the return of a free shutter and advanced ignition of the primer until the cartridge was fully chambered. Such a scheme of operation of automation made the weapon quite simple, but limited the power of the ammunition, and the initial velocity of the projectile was within 500 m / s. Food was supplied from a detachable magazine for 12 shots. With a length of 1 mm, the weight of a 370-mm machine was 20 kg, which, combined with a relatively small return, made it possible to install it on a light tripod machine.


Becker's 20-mm cannon in the exposition of the Military History Museum in Prague

The Czechoslovak generals planned to use "20 mm machine guns" to protect crossings and bridges from low-altitude attacks by combat aircraft. However, the military quickly became disillusioned with the Becker guns, due to the low initial velocity of the projectile, the range and accuracy of fire made it possible to effectively fire at fast-moving air targets at a distance of no more than 600 m, which approximately corresponded to the capabilities of rifle-caliber anti-aircraft machine gun installations. Although by 1939 the Becker guns were hopelessly outdated, some of them remained in service. The Germans captured 29 of these anti-aircraft guns, later they were transferred to Slovakia.

Having gained experience in operating the first 20-mm machine guns, in the early 1930s, the Czechoslovak army began searching for a more advanced high-speed anti-aircraft artillery mount.

By that time, specialists from the Swiss company Oerlikon Contraves AG had brought the model known as 1S to mass production. Unlike the Becker gun, the new 20mm assault rifle was chambered for the more powerful 20x110mm cartridge. The muzzle velocity of a 117 g projectile was 830 m/s, which increased armor penetration and direct firing range. The weight of the gun without the machine is about 70 kg. The mass of the unit in transport position is 295 kg. Calculation of 7 people. Rate of fire - 450 rds / min. Elevation angles: -8° to +75°. In the brochures of the Oerlikon company, it was indicated that the reach in height was 3 km, in range - 4,4 km. The real capabilities of the anti-aircraft "Oerlikon" were about half as modest.

The first batch of 12 improved Oerlikons was purchased in 1934. After thorough field and military tests, the anti-aircraft gun was put into service under the designation 2 cm VKPL vz. 36 (2 cm heavy anti-aircraft machine gun mod. 36).


20 mm anti-aircraft gun 2 cm VKPL vz. 36 in firing position

In 1936, it was decided to purchase 424 2 cm VKPL vz. 36. However, these plans have not been fully realized. At the end of 1938, there were 285 20-mm Oerlikons in the combat units of the Czechoslovak army and in warehouses.


Calculation of anti-aircraft installation 2 cm VKPL vz. 36 in firing position

"Heavy machine guns" 2 cm VKPL vz. 36 equipped 16 air defense companies, which were mainly attached to "fast" (motorized) divisions. Anti-aircraft installations, as a rule, were transported in the back of two-ton Tatra T82 trucks.


A significant drawback was the impossibility of firing from the back of a truck, for this the crew had to remove the anti-aircraft gun and deploy it on the ground. Subsequently, this problem was solved by installing a special platform in the body of a four-ton Tatra T85 car, which provides circular fire and the necessary elevation angles. It was the first ZSU in Czechoslovakia that could be used to escort transport convoys.

The armed forces of the Third Reich received 165 anti-aircraft guns 2 cm VKPL vz. 36, 62 more were transferred to the Slovak army. In VKPL vz. 36 used the same ammunition as the German Flak 28, and they served mainly in the air defense of airfields. Despite the availability of more modern 20 mm anti-aircraft guns, the Germans operated the 2 cm VKPL vz. 36 along with Flak 28 until the end of hostilities. The last Swiss-made 20 mm anti-aircraft guns were decommissioned in Czechoslovakia in the early 1950s.

During the occupation, Czech military factories not only produced German-style weapons, but also designed new ones according to German orders. So, for the Kriegsmarine, the design bureau of the Waffenwerke Brünn enterprise (as Zbrojovka Brno was called during the years of occupation) created a 30-mm twin anti-aircraft gun designed to arm submarines and small displacement ships.

Production of the 3,0 cm MK 303 (Br) twin naval anti-aircraft gun (also known as the 3,0 cm Flakzwilling MK 303) began in October 1944. The new anti-aircraft gun had a system for supplying ammunition from magazines for 10 shots, with a rate of fire from two barrels up to 900 rds / min. Compared to the German 30-mm anti-aircraft gun 3,0 cm Flak 103/38, the paired installation, created in the Czech Republic, had a much longer barrel, which made it possible to increase the muzzle velocity of the projectile to 900 m / s and bring the range of effective fire against an air target to 3 000 m.


30 mm twin anti-aircraft gun 3,0 cm MK 303 (Br)

Although the twin 30-mm anti-aircraft guns were originally intended for installation on warships, most of them were used in stationary land positions. Before the surrender of Germany, more than 220 anti-aircraft installations 3,0 cm MK 303 (Br) were delivered.

Shortly after the adoption of the 47-mm anti-tank gun PUV vz. 36, Škoda created on its basis an anti-aircraft gun 4.7 cm kanon PL vz. 37.


47-mm anti-aircraft gun 4.7 cm kanon PL vz. 37 in the museum exhibition

For firing from a cannon with a barrel length of 2 mm, a 040-mm fragmentation tracer projectile weighing 47 kg with an initial velocity of 1,6 m/s was used. The reach in height was 780 m. The rate of fire was 6 rds / min. To ensure all-round firing and better stability, the gun had four supports, the wheel axles served as two supports, and two more rested on jacks. The mass of the gun in combat position is about 000 ton.

Taking into account the fact that in the late 1930s the market for anti-aircraft guns was dominated by 37–40 mm machine guns, a gun with a semi-automatic shutter, which has a relatively low rate of fire for an anti-aircraft gun, did not interest the Czechoslovak military, who were leaning in favor of the 40 mm Bofors L60 machine gun. The only advantages of the Czech 47-mm semi-automatic anti-aircraft gun over the Bofors were lower cost and simplicity of design. A somewhat longer range of a direct shot and the mass of the projectile did not play a special role. The fragmentation-tracer 47-mm projectile was equipped with an impact fuse with a self-liquidator, but due to the low rate of fire of the gun, the tracer adjustment had almost no effect on the effectiveness of firing at fast-moving targets. In 1938, the Skoda company tested a 47-mm automatic anti-aircraft gun, but after the German occupation, work in this direction was curtailed.

Despite the obvious obsolescence of 47-mm semi-automatic anti-aircraft guns, they were ordered by Yugoslavia, after which the command of the Czechoslovak army decided to support the local manufacturer and also adopted the gun. The Germans, realizing the low efficiency of the 4.7 cm kanon PL vz. 37, used them as anti-amphibious guns, which could also conduct barrage anti-aircraft fire, and placed them in the fortifications of the "Atlantic Wall". In the Wehrmacht, these guns were designated as 4.7cm Flak 37(t).

Medium-caliber anti-aircraft guns


Czechoslovakia inherited 76,5 mm anti-aircraft guns 8 cm Luftfahrzeug Abwehr-Kanone M.5 / 8 MP from Austria-Hungary. This anti-aircraft gun was created on the basis of a 1905 model field gun. A notable feature of this artillery system was the barrel made of “steel-bronze” (“Thiele Bronze”), which was typical for some guns designed in the second half of the XNUMXth century.


Such a barrel was made using a special technology: punches of a diameter slightly larger than the barrel itself were sequentially driven through a drilled channel. As a result, precipitation and compaction of the metal occurred, and its inner layers became much stronger. But due to its lower strength compared to steel, the bronze barrel did not allow the use of powder charges that were optimal for maximum firing range, however, bronze did not corrode and was less prone to tearing, and most importantly, such a barrel cost much less.


Anti-aircraft gun 8 cm Luftfahrzeug Abwehr-Kanone M.5/8 MP in firing position

In combat position, the anti-aircraft gun weighed 2 kg and had circular horizontal fire, and the vertical aiming angle ranged from -470 ° to + 10 °. The effective range of fire against air targets is up to 80 m. Rate of fire: 3–600 rds/min. For firing at air targets, a shrapnel projectile was used, weighing 7 kg and having an initial speed of 9 m / s. He was equipped with 6,68 bullets weighing 500 g and 316 g.

Initially, the gun did not have a wheeled carriage and was intended for use in stationary positions. In 1923, a four-wheeled cart was developed for an anti-aircraft gun, which made it possible to significantly reduce the time to change positions. By 1924, 76,5 anti-aircraft batteries were equipped with modernized 3-mm anti-aircraft guns, but the effectiveness of firing shrapnel shells with a low muzzle velocity remained low. Nevertheless, stationary and mobile anti-aircraft guns M.5 / 8 remained in service until 1939. Subsequently, these guns, like many other obsolete captured artillery systems, were used by the Germans in the fortifications of the Atlantic Wall.

From 1928 to 1933, 132 modernized Skoda 76.5 mm L/50 anti-aircraft guns were produced with a longer steel barrel and improved breech. Shooting was carried out with a fragmentation grenade weighing 6,5 kg, with an initial speed of 808 m / s. Rate of fire: 10-12 rds / min. Reach in height - 8 m. Elevation angles - from 300 to + 0 °. The mass of the gun in combat position is 85 kg.

A significant increase in firing efficiency was achieved due to the introduction of a control section with an optical rangefinder and POISO into the anti-aircraft battery. After the capture, the Wehrmacht used these anti-aircraft guns under the designation 7,65 cm Flak 33(t).

In the second half of the 1930s, Skoda specialists made an attempt to radically improve the characteristics of the 76,5-mm anti-aircraft guns. In 1937, the 8 cm Kanon PL vz. 37 with a 215 mm longer barrel and improved breech.


Anti-aircraft gun 8 cm Kanon PL vz. 37 in the museum exhibition

For that time, it was a completely modern anti-aircraft gun with a wedge gate and a detachable wheel drive. In combat position, it was hung on jacks on four sliding supports. The wheel drive was sprung. For firing, a fragmentation grenade was used, designed for 8 cm Kanon PL vz. 33. The rate of fire was 12-15 rds / min. The maximum range of fire against air targets is 11 m. The vertical aiming angles are from 400 to + 0 °. Between the autumn of 85 and March 1937, the troops received 1939 97 mm 76,5 cm Kanon PL vz. 8. They were subsequently divided between Germany and Slovakia. In Germany, these guns received the designation 37 cm Flak 7.65(t).

In 1937, the production of the 75 mm anti-aircraft gun 7.5 cm kanon PL vz. 37, which used a 75x656 mm R shot with a fragmentation grenade weighing 6,5 kg, leaving the barrel at a speed of 775 m/s. The vertical reach was 9 m. The rate of fire was 200-12 rounds / min. The mass of the gun in the combat position is 15 kg, in the stowed position - 2 kg.


Anti-aircraft gun 7.5 cm kanon PL vz. 37 in firing position

Initially, the 75-mm anti-aircraft gun was intended for export, but subsequently a number of such guns served in the Czechoslovak air defense forces in parallel with the 8 cm Kanon PL vz. 37. Outwardly, these two artillery systems were very similar, they can be distinguished by the muzzle. The barrel of the 75-mm anti-aircraft gun ended with a muzzle brake of a characteristic shape.

75 mm guns 7.5 cm kanon PL vz. 37 were exported to Argentina, Lithuania, Romania and Yugoslavia. The Germans managed to capture 90 of these Czech anti-aircraft guns. Partially they were transferred to Italy and Finland. In Germany, they were referred to as 7,5 cm Flak M 37 (t). As of September 1944, the anti-aircraft units of the Luftwaffe had 12 such guns.

In 1922, a four-gun battery of 83,5-mm anti-aircraft guns was transferred for military trials, and after their successful completion, the towed artillery mount was put into service under the designation 8.35 cm PL kanon vz. 22. At that time, it was the best anti-aircraft artillery system in its class.


Anti-aircraft gun 8.35 cm PL kanon vz. Xnumx

The gun weighing 8 kg was developed by the designers of the Skoda company, based on the possibility of towing by a horse team with a maximum increase in caliber. For firing, a shot of 800x83,5 mm R was used with a 677-kg fragmentation grenade equipped with a remote fuse. The projectile left the barrel 10 m long with an initial velocity of 4,6 m/s. That made it possible to hit air targets at an altitude of up to 800 m. The rate of fire was up to 11 rds / min. Elevation angles: from 000 to +12°. Calculation of 0 people. The maximum travel speed is 85 km/h.

The order for 144 guns with spare barrels was fully completed in 1933, after which the 83,5-mm anti-aircraft guns began to be offered for export. However, due to the rather high price, the gun was not in great demand, Yugoslavia became the only foreign buyer.

Until September 1938, 83,5-mm anti-aircraft guns formed the basis of the Czechoslovak air defense system. In total, the Czechoslovak army had four anti-aircraft artillery regiments equipped with 8.35 cm PL kanon vz. 22.

In 1937, anti-aircraft guns 8.35 cm PL kanon vz. 22 have been upgraded. In connection with the increase in the speed of combat aircraft, a number of measures were taken to improve efficiency. Gun commanders had field telephones at their disposal, which transmitted information about the flight altitude, speed and course of the target. An improved optical rangefinder post was introduced into the anti-aircraft battery. Two or three batteries, deployed not far from each other, were given searchlight installations and sound direction finders.

After the occupation, the Wehrmacht received 119 83,5-mm anti-aircraft guns and almost 315 thousand shells, another 25 83,5-mm guns went to Slovakia. In Germany, the guns were marked 8.35 cm Flak 22(t). Czech sources claim that for the first time the Germans used captured anti-aircraft guns against French pillboxes on the Maginot Line.


During World War II, 83,5 mm anti-aircraft guns were deployed in Poland, the Czech Republic and Austria. A dozen and a half hit the fortifications of the Atlantic Wall, where they could fire not only on aircraft, but also on ships. In 1944, Czech factories produced a number of 83,5-mm shots equipped with armor-piercing blanks, which made it possible to effectively deal with armored vehicles.

During the First World War at the Škoda factory for the Austrian fleet 90-mm guns were produced, used as an auxiliary caliber on cruisers. In 1919, eight 90-mm guns taken from warehouses were placed in stationary positions along the Danube. At the first stage, their main purpose was to counter the possible attacks of the Hungarian monitors, and the fight against the air enemy was considered as a secondary task. In 1920, a small-scale production of 9 cm PL kanon vz. 12/20 with improved sights and aiming drives, optimal for anti-aircraft fire. A fragmentation grenade with a remote fuse was introduced into the ammunition load.


90 mm anti-aircraft gun 9 cm PL kanon vz. 12/20 in a stationary position

Gun weight 9 cm PL kanon vz. 12/20, placed permanently, was 6 kg. Barrel length - 500 mm. Elevation angles - from -4° to +050°. Projectile weight - 5 kg. Initial speed - 90 m / s. Reach in height - 10,2 m. Rate of fire - 770 rds / min. Calculation - 6 people.

Twelve newly manufactured anti-aircraft guns 9 cm PL kanon vz. 12/20 entered service with the 151st anti-aircraft artillery regiment of three batteries. Later, it included previously manufactured and overhauled 90-mm guns, as well as four stationary 8 cm Luftfahrzeugabwehr-Kanone M.5 / 8 MP

For the 1920s, 90 mm anti-aircraft guns were among the most powerful, but by 1938 they were outdated. The Germans in March 1939 got twelve 90-mm guns and more than 26 thousand shells. As guns of no particular combat value, they were removed from stationary positions and sent for storage. In 1943, due to an acute shortage of air defense systems, they were again put into service under the designation 9 cm Flak M 12 (t).

Продолжение следует ...
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -10
    31 March 2023 04: 59
    Yes, then the Czechs were shy, but they made weapons for the Nazis, and now they are not shy. Are Prague and Brno on the list of targets for the Strategic Missile Forces, if not, why not?
  2. +13
    31 March 2023 05: 07
    Militarily, the Czechs of the early second quarter of the 20th century were strong enough to have the political will to snap back, but ...
    R.s. Traditionally high-quality article Sergey, thank you!!!
    Good day to all friends!
    1. +8
      31 March 2023 07: 44
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      Militarily, the Czechs of the early second quarter of the 20th century were strong enough to have the political will to snap back, but ...

      It was always interesting what would happen if a sufficiently large and well-equipped Czech army entered the battle? hi
    2. AAK
      -5
      31 March 2023 13: 26
      Wouldn’t it be easier, colleagues, to publish a fairly short article on VO ... - like: in total, from 1939 to 1945, so many tens (hundreds) of thousands of large, medium and small Czech and Slovak industrial enterprises with ... millions of workers who produced: tanks - ... thousand pieces, artillery pieces of caliber from ... mm to ... mm - ... thousand pieces, small arms - .. .million pieces, shells of various calibers - ... million pieces, cartridges of various calibers - ... hundreds of million pieces, + ... hundreds of locomotives for railways, + sets of spare parts and equipment for the needs of the Wehrmacht , Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine, also delivered ... million tons of food, etc. ... + how many Czechs and Slovaks fought on the eastern front in the SS formations, in the same Slovak units such as the "Loose Division", in the police, etc. parts ... well, for comparison - how many underground sabotage and acts of sabotage have been at Czech enterprises over the years ... the contrast will surprise everyone ...
      Therefore, if we have at least a little bit of "state patriots" upstairs, then they need to remember everything well and, at the first opportunity, make the year 1968 seem like a holiday to them ...
      1. AAK
        -5
        31 March 2023 17: 46
        I’m not surprised at the cons, the CIPSO-shnaya army is strong in VO
        1. 0
          April 1 2023 20: 03
          Quote: AAK
          I’m not surprised at the cons, the CIPSO-shnaya army is strong in VO

          And how I'm not surprised. )))
    3. +3
      31 March 2023 14: 33
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      In military terms, the Czechs of the early second quarter of the 20th century were

      they had fortified areas only in the Sudettes. With Austria, a passage yard.
      Against Austria and Germany, there was no chance.
      And then more people jumped up.

      Czechoslovakia was actually betrayed then. And not only the British with the French
      Quote: Mihaylov
      if a sufficiently large and well-equipped Czech army entered the battle?

      There was a population of about 15 million people.
      Standard 1 million inhabitants - 1 division.
      maximum 15 divisions of Czechoslovakia, against
      By September 1, 1939, 12 army corps were formed from 38 divisions, with a total strength of 582 people. The total strength of the Wehrmacht was 000 men.

      without the rest.
      Chance zero
      1. +5
        31 March 2023 16: 44
        Good graphics, educational.
      2. 0
        April 2 2023 06: 43
        Quote from Digger
        without the rest.
        Chance zero

        Well, the compassionate Poles made a fuss so that there would be no "others" - they refused to let the Red Army through.
    4. +3
      April 1 2023 15: 04
      It's nice to read the author! I join all the good wishes! hi
  3. +9
    31 March 2023 06: 21
    "Heavy machine guns" 2 cm VKPL vz. 36 equipped 16 air defense companies, which were mainly attached to "fast" (motorized) divisions.
    That is, in 1936, the Czechs (!) Already thought about protecting mobile connections from the threat "from the air." It became interesting, in the Red Army, was anyone puzzled by this problem at the same time?
    Thank you, Sergey!
    1. +14
      31 March 2023 06: 48
      Anton, hello!
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      That is, in 1936, the Czechs (!) Already thought about protecting mobile connections from the threat "from the air." It became interesting, in the Red Army, was anyone puzzled by this problem at the same time?

      Bewildered! Yes Another question is that we did not have suitable anti-aircraft guns in the second half of the 30s. No.
      The release of 2-cm Rheinmetall assault rifles, which received the name "20-mm automatic anti-aircraft gun mod. 1930" (2K) Plant No. 8 (named after Kalinin) failed miserably. The 12,7-mm DShK machine gun was brought to perfection only in 1938, and mass production began in 1940. As a result, the main military air defense system in the initial period of the Second World War was the ZPU M4 of the 1931 model, mounted on the chassis of a GAZ-AA truck.
      1. +5
        31 March 2023 07: 06
        As a result, the main military air defense system in the initial period of the Second World War was the ZPU M4 of the 1931 model, mounted on the chassis of a GAZ-AA truck.
        Well, for that time, quite a "Shilka" ... My question is more related to the problem of saturating troops with mobile air defense systems.
        1. +7
          31 March 2023 07: 23
          Hello!
          Quote: 3x3zsave
          , for that time, quite a "Shilka" ... My question rather relates to the problem of saturating troops with mobile air defense systems.

          Yes, so-so "Shilka", by the beginning of World War II, the installation of a rifle caliber had already begun to lose ground. Taking into account the mass, baggy maintenance and dimensions, the M4 installation can hardly be called successful. Tokarev's surrogate installation with built-in aviation PV-1 turned out to be more relevant.
      2. +6
        31 March 2023 08: 35
        Did the Germans themselves "give birth" to a sane design from their 2cm machine gun or "went the other way"?
        By "Oerlikon" ... and "Solothurn" ..
        "The Reichswehr was armed with 20-mm Oerlikon automatic anti-aircraft guns in 1932, when 200 copies of Flak 28 (on a tripod machine with detachable wheel travel) and Flak 29 (on a pedestal carriage) were purchased in Switzerland. Later on, the fleet of anti-aircraft Oerlikons" replenished with Czechoslovak VZKP vz. 36 (165 copies) and Dutch 2 tl no. 1 (120).
        ...
        In 1934, the factories of the Rheinmetall-Borsig concern in Berlin and Breslau began production of the modified Solothurn ST-5 anti-aircraft gun, adopted by the Wehrmacht under the designation Flak 30.
        https://warspot.ru/19222-malokalibernyy-universal
        1. +6
          31 March 2023 09: 46
          Did the Germans themselves "give birth" to a sane design from their 2cm machine gun or "went the other way"?
          By "Oerlikon" ... and "Solothurn" ..
          "The Reichswehr was armed with 20-mm Oerlikon automatic anti-aircraft guns in 1932, when 200 copies of Flak 28 (on a tripod machine with detachable wheel travel) and Flak 29 (on a pedestal carriage) were purchased in Switzerland. Later on, the fleet of anti-aircraft Oerlikons" replenished with Czechoslovak VZKP vz. 36 (165 copies) and Dutch 2 tl no. 1 (120).
          ...
          In 1934, the factories of the Rheinmetall-Borsig concern in Berlin and Breslau began production of the modified Solothurn ST-5 anti-aircraft gun, adopted by the Wehrmacht under the designation Flak 30.

          In the Spanish Civil War, they were mainly used against our I-15 and I-16, which were used as attack aircraft, rifle-caliber anti-aircraft guns. Based on the experience of their use, Ilyushin made his armored attack aircraft with protection against rifle bullets from the ground, but in 41 the German air defense forces were already armed with 20mm machine guns. And the extra weight of the armor with insufficient engine power played against the survivability of the IL-2. The armor did not hold 20mm projectiles, the radiators of the water-cooled engines were very vulnerable, the large weight significantly reduced maneuverability and speed, thus not allowing it to effectively resist fighters. At the same time, I-16 and I-153 with air-cooled engines were less vulnerable to fire from the ground, also high maneuverability at low altitudes made it possible to evade Messerschmites attacks and could operate without cover by other fighters, and these "obsolete" fighters could also dive almost vertically and lay bombs almost pointwise, which was used in the destruction of bridges. Therefore, they had much better survivability during attack missions, the ability to use the RS-2 very accurately, compared to the IL-82, but ... the capacities of the aviation industry were tuned to the promoted IL-2, and Polikarpov's authority was not enough. Nobody dared to admit the mistake in the concept of the attack aircraft, although Bulganin and Air Marshal Khudyakov wrote a letter to Stalin about the resumption of production of the I-16 and I-153, but it was impossible to rebuild the well-established production during the war.

          Excerpts from the memoirs of twice Hero of the Soviet Union Rechkalov about the first weeks of the war, then he had a "Seagull", and then I-16 -

          The temptation to fire the "eres" first at the regiment was great. I agreed. Agreed to keep it a secret until everything is fully prepared for firing....


          The target was a lone tree on the edge of a ravine. I took to the air and smoothly brought the plane into a gentle dive. Below, spectators loomed like little insects. I aimed diligently. And when the target hung on the thread of the crosshair, I launched and at the same moment a characteristic whistle was heard through the noise of the motor. The "thread" is broken. The tree, cut down by the ruptures, fell to the ground.

          Kuzma Bessekirny was in seventh heaven. Still would! To dig up such a strong weapon in the warehouse, which immediately proved itself in the eyes of the pilots!


          We were always surprised by the anti-aircraft defense of the Germans. Not a single attack did not do without holes in someone's plane. Even in marching columns, on the march, the Nazis fired at us from anti-aircraft guns.


          The squadron commander rushed to the attack from the combat turn, Zibin followed him. I went after Ivan, but again lagged behind a little in order to aim more accurately.

          Here is the goal! Just for the "eres"! I caught the most open object in the crosshairs - a tank. The bombs just dropped by Dubinin and Zibin came into view. They separated smoothly, reluctantly, as if they did not want to part with their planes.
          The black cross on the enemy tank grew rapidly. The vague outlines of the white border became clearer. It's time! Two tailed comets burst from under the wings and immediately exploded in the steel hull. Following Dubinin, I got out of the dive and could not resist - I looked down. Explosions of bombs rumbled throughout the forest, and above all this gigantic whirlwind, a huge black column of smoke stretched upward - a direct hit from my shells.

          Above the silver "seagulls" familiar silhouettes swept from above. "Thin" (Messerschmites)! How many of them! A couple, two... four! Rather, to the comrades, to the junkyard of spinning cars. In a heap, among his own, safer. But then two Germans attacked me at once.

          I slip out from under the attack, I try to break through to my own. Failed. Attack follows attack. Machine-gun bursts rush very close.


          The Germans meanwhile continued to attack. I repelled another attack. Powerless to come to my tail on the turn, the fascist slipped under the "seagull"


          Here is the "Messer" at the crosshairs of the grid. I press the start button and I can almost feel the electric pulse sparking into the rocket. There is a whistling sound under the wings. Two fiery meteors jump off the sled and strike at the enemy with lightning speed.

          Our three "donkeys" are on patrol; we gaze into the sky, looking for enemy fighters. There is no danger yet. And below, below us, the "seagulls" slash the air with rockets. These “eres” are a strong thing: they smash to smithereens everything that comes in their way. Several tanks were already shrouded in smoke. Others freeze motionless. ...Swinging my wings to my comrades, I swoop down on the car, with which the paired Orlikons snarl more fiercely than others. I press the triggers and feel the heavy clatter of wing cannons with my whole body. Shells heap pierce into the car; together with the crew, they smash the body to pieces, shred the cabin, the engine.

          And all this was almost without loss ...
          1. +4
            31 March 2023 09: 50
            An interesting answer... without answering the question!
            What did the Teutons themselves create from their "Rheinmetal farts" sold in the USSR if they themselves bought Oerlikons and produced Solothurns?
      3. +6
        31 March 2023 11: 12
        Quote: Bongo
        The release of 2-cm Rheinmetall assault rifles, which received the name “20-mm automatic anti-aircraft gun mod. 1930" (2K) Plant No. 8 (named after Kalinin) failed miserably.

        At the same time, ZiK failed the release of a 37-mm automatic anti-aircraft gun mod. 1928 She is 11-K. She is the "pom-pom" "Vickers", re-barreled under 37-mm.
        Moreover, ZiK managed to do this, despite the fact that this machine gun was previously produced in the USSR by the Bolshevik plant, from where it was transferred.

        The need for MZA for the Red Army was well understood by the leadership. By the mid-30s, things had reached the resolutions of the Council of Labor and Defense.
        Quote: Bongo
        The 12,7 mm DShK machine gun was brought to perfection only in 1938, and mass production began in 1940.

        Even ShVAK was considered as an air defense system for the Red Army. But the 20-mm version for air defense turned out to be unsuitable due to poor ballistics. Serveytsev arranged ShVAK-12,7 - but it was gobbled up by the 20-mm version.
        Although ... I would like to see how the army team would operate two systems of the same caliber with non-interchangeable cartridges. laughing
      4. +5
        31 March 2023 15: 58
        Good day, Sergey! smile

        When you look at the assortment and volume of weapons and equipment baked in Czechoslovakia, then involuntarily, by itself, the thought arises that the Germans were simply OBLIGED to occupy this country.
        Thank you for the article and hello to your wife. smile hi
        1. +1
          31 March 2023 18: 03
          And then the question arises - "Why did they get trampled in the USSR?"
          1. +3
            April 1 2023 08: 48
            "Why did they get trampled in the USSR?"


            Pashenichka was born then. laughing
          2. +2
            April 3 2023 15: 14
            Quote: hohol95
            And then the question arises - "Why did they get trampled in the USSR?"

            It’s just that the army and navy chose the lesser of two evils, as it seemed to them then. Between the guaranteed meat grinder of the "Sea Lion" and the attack on the "colossus with feet of clay", the Germans chose the colossus. smile
            Plus the quirk of Adolf, who dreamed that limes continue to persist only because they hope to sign the "Russian steamroller" for themselves. And if you deprive them of this hope, then the war will be over. The key to victory over Britain, according to the Fuhrer, lay in the East.
            Here is such a cunning strategy of indirect action. Or schizophrenia on the march: everything seems to be logical, except for the initial postulate. For the hope of Britain then was overseas cousins, with whom they approved a joint strategy for a world war as early as the beginning of 1941.
            1. +1
              April 3 2023 15: 27
              Quote: Alexey RA
              Here is such a cunning strategy of indirect action. Or schizophrenia on the march: everything seems to be logical, except for the initial postulate. For the hope of Britain then was overseas cousins, with whom they approved a joint strategy for a world war as early as the beginning of 1941.

              In fact, this was openly discussed back in the summer of 40, We Shall Fight on the Beaches. So here Adolf is not the fact that he was sincere.

              Perhaps he was trying to disguise the theme of a war on two fronts, which even at that time had unfavorable connotations. Comrade Stalin, without any Britain there, was a difficult neighbor.
      5. +4
        April 2 2023 08: 20
        Quote: Bongo
        ... created a 30-mm twin anti-aircraft gun,
        designed to arm submarines and ships ...

        ... marine anti-aircraft installation 3,0 cm MK 303 (Br)
        also known as 3,0 cm Flakzwilling MK 303...
        Author: Linnik Sergey

        hi
        There are designations "3 cm MK 303 (Br) M44" and "3 cm Flak M44"
        In total, about 222 units were produced.
        They were equipped with type XXI submarines.

        Until the end of the war, 118 boats of this type were armed with two twin MK 303/M44 mounts.
        The guns were placed in turret mounts with light anti-fragmentation armor.
        In the submerged position, the towers were automatically retracted inside the cabin.
        The towers could be controlled both directly,
        and with the help of electric drives from inside the robust housing.
        Is this the 3,0 cm MK 303 naval anti-aircraft gun?

        1. +2
          April 3 2023 03: 22
          Misha, hello!
          Quote: Mister X
          Until the end of the war, 118 boats of this type were armed with two twin MK 303/M44 mounts.

          It is extremely unlikely that so many boats could be armed with 30-mm anti-aircraft guns.
          Quote: Mister X
          Is this the 3,0 cm MK 303 naval anti-aircraft gun?

          Frankly, I'm not sure. request I did not study this issue closely, for good it is necessary to make a separate article on German naval anti-aircraft guns. Can you take it?
          1. +1
            April 3 2023 07: 47
            Quote: Bongo
            Can you take it?

            Hello!
            You know that I will be digging and licking the topic for six months.
            I can even learn a little German
            But there is no time...
            There are more important things
    2. 0
      31 March 2023 08: 23
      It became interesting, in the Red Army, was anyone puzzled by this problem at the same time?

      As I understand it, in those days, the task of air defense was assigned to fighter aircraft. Which is logically more true. Aviation is mobile, it can be easily concentrated in the right direction.
      1. +2
        31 March 2023 09: 33
        Quote: bairat
        As I understand it, in those days, the task of air defense was assigned to fighter aircraft. Which is logically more true. Aviation is mobile, it can be easily concentrated in the right direction.

        But in the event of a breakthrough of a fighter barrier in the absence of air defense, any aircraft that broke through became a wolf in a sheepfold. And breaking through the then barrier was absolutely no problem.
      2. 0
        31 March 2023 11: 36
        As I understand it, in those days, the task of air defense was assigned to fighter aircraft. Which is logically more true. Aviation is mobile, it can be easily concentrated in the right direction.

        We and the Germans had different tactics for using fighter aircraft. Our tactics consisted of covering objects, columns, escorting bombers and attack aircraft, and intercepting enemy bombers. Among the Germans, fighters were aimed at air patrols in order to gain air supremacy, i.e. the destruction of everything that flies and sometimes the attack and of course were used as interceptors. Escort bombers also took place, but they took into account the different speeds of the aircraft. and they simply cleared the sky in front of the bombers, and did not accompany them like our fighters, which were in passive mode. The Germans also moved from simple fighters to versatile fighter-bombers, such as the Focke-Wulf-190, which replaced the Yu-87 "Laptezhniki".
        A moving column at the speed of a tank required a significant expenditure of the resource of a fighter making circles over the column, so the Wehrmacht used mobile anti-aircraft guns. We have not appeared such ZSU. In many ways, the Luftwaffe acted more efficiently than our Air Force precisely because of the tactics and concentration of aviation in important areas.
    3. +4
      31 March 2023 13: 49
      That is, in 1936, the Czechs (!) Already thought about protecting mobile connections from the threat "from the air." It became interesting, in the Red Army, was anyone puzzled by this problem at the same time?

      The Red Army, of course, was puzzled, but there was simply nothing to solve this problem in those years. A lot can be written about the ZPU M4 sample 1931 of the four "maxims", but at the time in question it was already archaic. In the Red Army, with the MZA, especially with the mobile one, in the pre-war period it was frankly bad. Yes, and with anti-aircraft artillery in general, too.
      A significant drawback was the impossibility of firing from the back of a truck, for this the crew had to remove the anti-aircraft gun and deploy it on the ground. Subsequently, this problem was solved by installing a special platform in the body of a four-ton Tatra T85 car, which provides circular fire and the necessary elevation angles. It was the first ZSU in Czechoslovakia that could be used to escort transport convoys.

      For some reason incomprehensible to me, the author began to make punctures that were completely unnatural for him. The Czechs solved the issue of shooting from the car body already on the Tatra 82.

      What is the author's creative crisis.
      1. +3
        31 March 2023 15: 41
        You might think other countries were better with mobile memory!
        British, French, American, Chinese...
        1. +5
          31 March 2023 18: 09
          You might think other countries were better with mobile memory!
          British, French, American, Chinese...

          The Chinese at that time were really bad with mobile memory. Yes, and with non-mobile ones too.
          But some countries have already moved in this direction.

          Japanese 20 mm Type 98. 1938.

          Swedish 40 mm Landsverk L-62 Anti II.
          1. +4
            31 March 2023 21: 14

            British Birch Gun - 1925.

            The British Light Tank AA Mk.I. 1938
            1. 0
              April 1 2023 10: 48
              How big was the production of these British SPAAGs?
              And where are the French ZSU?
          2. +1
            April 1 2023 11: 12
            That is bad luck ...
            They write that the Swedes and Hungarians (their self-propelled guns "Nimrod") positioned their self-propelled guns as anti-tank!
            And only after making sure that the Nimrods were incapable of fighting the Soviet T-34s and KV-1s, they forced them to reconsider the combat use of self-propelled guns. And they were retrained in ZSU.
            The Swedes probably did the same, but without participating in the war!
  4. 0
    31 March 2023 07: 04
    Please fix the title. Not "Nazi", but "Nazi".
    1. 0
      31 March 2023 08: 08
      Noticed an error
      Select the text and press Ctrl + Enter
  5. +5
    31 March 2023 09: 12
    Shortly after the adoption of the 47-mm anti-tank gun PUV vz. 36, Škoda created on its basis an anti-aircraft gun 4.7 cm kanon PL vz. 37
    ...
    47-mm anti-aircraft gun 4.7 cm kanon PL vz. 37 in the museum exhibition

    The photo does not show 4.7 cm kanon PL vz. 37, and the experimental 4,7 cm protiletadlový kanón Škoda Z2.


    Here are the references to "47 mm anti-aircraft gun 4.7 cm kanon PL vz. 37" missing in the literature. vz. 37 for the Czechs - only a 75 mm anti-aircraft gun. If possible, I would like to know the source from the author.
  6. +4
    31 March 2023 09: 51
    3x3zsave (Anton), respected, based on the T-26 tank with reinforced suspension, in mid-October 1935, at the Experimental Plant of Spetsmashtrest in Leningrad, was made in SU-6 metal with a 76-mm 3K anti-aircraft gun on a pedestal mount. Folding sheets covered the gun on the march; when firing, they served as a platform for the ZSU crew. The weight of the installation was 11 tons, the crew was 6 people, the ammunition load was only 48 shells. And for self-defense there were 2 more DT-29s. The military was not satisfied with the stability of the gun and, as a result, the low accuracy of the gun and the very small amount of ammunition carried. The suspension, although it was reinforced, was heavily overloaded, which led to frequent breakdowns. The height of the installation greatly reduced the patency on the slopes. In January 1937, the tests were stopped. The idea is wonderful, but the T-26 base: alas, alas, alas ...
    1. +4
      31 March 2023 11: 09
      And on the basis of the T-28 they tried to create the Su-8.
      Did not work.
      1. +5
        31 March 2023 16: 57
        Hi Aleksey!
        Found images of SU-6 and SU-8, but no real photos.




        And the SU-8 is generally from some kind of computer toy. request
        1. +2
          April 1 2023 10: 52
          The ZSU SU-8 is an attempt to cross the T-28 chassis and the 76,2mm 3-K anti-aircraft gun.
          "The only prototype of the SU-8 anti-aircraft self-propelled guns was never completed. At the end of 1934, it was converted into a tank. This fate of the unfinished vehicle speaks of one of the main reasons why the SU-8 was not only not accepted into service, but even tested."
          https://topwar.ru/55778-proekt-zenitnoy-samohodki-su-8.html
    2. +3
      31 March 2023 12: 13
      was made in metal SU-6 with 76 mm

      Anti-aircraft guns of this caliber and above were suitable only for barrage fire as part of batteries, i.e. for the protection of stationary objects. And the columns had to be protected from attack aircraft against which it was necessary to use self-propelled anti-aircraft small-caliber installations. The lack of the required amount of anti-aircraft artillery of 37 mm caliber and less served to the fact that the Black Sea Fleet practically hid from German aviation, and on torpedo boats they practiced rearranging the DShK from the boats that came from the raid to the ones preparing for the raid.
  7. -6
    31 March 2023 12: 01
    No wonder Hitler called the Czechs: "A gang of simulators and parasites." Oh, not in vain)))
  8. +3
    31 March 2023 16: 51
    hi
    As always, an interesting article!

    IMHO, of course, but the chances of Czechoslovakia surviving in such a situation are 30-40. was not, even with such an industry. Unless you "cosplay Switzerland" with its "total defense", but then, with the distribution of weapons with such a composition of the population, there would be a risk of a civil war ...
  9. +3
    April 1 2023 11: 00
    Sea Cat (Konstantin), dear, so the SU-8 is beyond the drawing stage
    did not advance. It seems that the idea to make a ZSU based on the T-28 was born too early, the tanks were still raw, and the choice of guns was not optimal. Three or four years later, when the industry was able to get rid of childhood illnesses of this tank, maybe it WOULD happen and the ZSU-37 WOULD be born earlier and not on the basis of a light tank, but on the basis of the T-28 ...
    Yes, on the basis of the same T-26, in metal, there was also a prototype with a 37-mm Shpitalny automatic gun made in the fall of 1936 at the same Spetsmashtrest Pilot Plant in Leningrad ...
    I saw several photos from the SU-6 in a video on YouTube, but I just can’t remember on which channel ...