South Korea to review aircraft carrier plans

20
South Korea to review aircraft carrier plans
CVX aircraft carrier models from two developers. In the foreground - from DSME, behind - from HHI


South Korea is about to design and build its first aircraft carrier. According to earlier plans, it will be a light class ship with aviation group of limited sizes. However, now the possibility of changing the terms of reference and the subsequent development of a larger ship is not excluded. Appropriate decisions will be made before the end of this year.



First South Korean


The fundamental possibility of building their own aircraft carrier for the Republic of Korea Navy has been discussed for a long time, but without real results. Only in February 2021, the Ministry of National Defense and the Defense Procurement Program Administration (DAPA) made the appropriate decision and approved the program for the development and construction of an aircraft carrier.

The program under the CVX code provides for the creation of a light-class aircraft carrier with a total displacement of 30 tons. The full-scale development of the new ship was planned to begin no later than 2022. In the middle of the decade, construction was to begin, and the delivery of the finished ship was planned for 2033.

At the time of the start of the CVX program, the cost of developing the project and building the ship was estimated at 2,03 trillion won (1,87 billion US dollars). In the future, plans were adjusted, and the program went up to 2,6 trillion won (2,34 billion dollars). In addition, about 3 trillion won (2,7 billion dollars) were going to be spent on the purchase of aviation equipment - 20 carrier-based fighters and 8 helicopters .


Aircraft carrier CVX from DSME. Left - section of the hull with a hangar deck

In June 2021, the leading South Korean shipbuilding enterprises showed two preliminary projects of the CVX aircraft carrier at one of the exhibitions. It is curious that already at this stage both projects went beyond the established framework. So, one ship had an estimated displacement of 45 thousand tons, the second - 60 thousand tons.

The CVX program enjoyed early support from South Korea's senior leadership, which helped drive its progress. However, in March 2022, the president changed in the country. The new head of state, Yoon Seok-yeol, did not share the enthusiasm of his predecessor. As a result, work slowed down, and the future of the aircraft carrier program was in doubt.

New plans


According to South Korean media, a few days ago, the current situation around the CVX program cleared up. It turned out that the military department plans to continue work on aircraft carriers. At the same time, the possibility of abandoning the current program and replacing it with a more complex and ambitious project is not ruled out.

It is reported that the Ministry of Defense of South Korea recently received an official request for the CVX program from one of the members of the Defense Committee of the National Assembly. In an official response, the ministry revealed plans for the coming months.

Thus, in March, a “political study” of the prospects for the existing program and the possibility of replacing it begins. If there are needs and opportunities, instead of a light aircraft carrier, CVX can develop a heavier ship. It will be large in size, and the displacement will reach 50 thousand tons. Such a revision of key parameters is directly related to proposals for the restructuring of the aviation group.


Flight deck from the project from DSME

The CVX program called for the use of American-designed F-35B short takeoff fighters that did not place high demands on the flight deck. Now instead of them it is proposed to use a promising carrier-based fighter KF-21N of its own design. It must take off from a springboard or catapult, and therefore requires a larger deck.

The prospects of existing and prospective projects will be studied until the end of this year. The Ministry of Defense will have to assess the technical potential of the two projects, the capabilities of the ships, as well as the cost and complexity of implementing programs. Then the South Korean leadership will make a decision in principle, in accordance with which further work will proceed. Which option will be chosen for further implementation is unknown.

Finished developments


Almost immediately after the launch of the CVX program, a competition for the development of preliminary projects began. Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME) and Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI) entered the fight for the order for full-fledged design and construction. The first results of the work in the form of layouts and promotional materials were shown in June 2021.

For various reasons, both developers did not meet the specified dimensions and displacement limits - the ships turned out to be one and a half to two times heavier than required. At the time of the presentation of the projects, it looked strange. However, against the backdrop of new plans and proposals, such projects look different. Developments on them may well be used to create a promising "heavy" aircraft carrier.


CVX in HHI variant

The 2021 project from DSME, developed with the participation of the British Babcock International, provided for the construction of a ship with a maximum length of 263 m and a width of 46,5 m with a displacement of 45 thousand tons. A rectangular flight deck was proposed without a bow springboard and an angular takeoff position. Two superstructures with different equipment were placed on the starboard side. The ship could receive a non-nuclear power plant with two propellers. The maximum design speed is 27 knots.

The air group of such a ship could include 28 F-35B short takeoff fighters and several helicopters. The hangar deck was able to accommodate 12 aircraft. Others were to remain on the flight deck. The possibility of basing horizontal takeoff aircraft was not specified.

HHI presented a project for an aircraft carrier with a length of 270 m and a displacement of 60 thousand tons. It received a flight deck 60 m wide with a central take-off position; on the sides of it, places were provided for placing equipment. Behind the aft section of the main flight deck, an additional small area area for unmanned aerial vehicles was provided. The superstructure was divided into two parts. The power plant is of an unknown type with three shafts.

An aircraft carrier from HHI should carry a mixed air group with F-35B fighters, as well as helicopters and UAVs of various types. On the flight deck of the exhibition model, 5 fighters and 6 helicopters were demonstrated. Additional site accepted 7 drones. The dimensions and capacity of the hangar deck are unclear.

Uncertain Future


According to the latest newsThe Ministry of Defense of South Korea will conduct the necessary studies by the end of the year and decide how exactly its aircraft carrier program will develop further. Depending on various factors, they may continue the existing CVX program or replace it with a new one. At the same time, both solutions have their advantages and disadvantages, and it is not yet clear which one will be chosen.


Flight decks with airplanes, helicopters and UAVs

By continuing the existing program, Seoul will not lose the money and efforts already invested in it. In addition, it will be possible to save money on the creation of carrier-based fighters. The terms of reference for the CVX aircraft carrier allows the use of only American F-35Bs, which are already in mass production.

Restarting the program with a new specification will lead to additional costs. However, contractors will be able to take as a basis previously submitted projects. In terms of dimensions and displacement, these ships fully comply with the new requirements, which to a certain extent will simplify the development of promising projects. With all this, it will be possible to equip the aircraft carrier with fighters of its own production.

Thus, the South Korean Ministry of Defense must evaluate a number of factors and determine which of them are most valuable in the context of development. fleet. He will have to consider issues of economics and cost reduction, industrial capabilities, performance characteristics, etc. At the same time, we are talking not only about shipbuilding, but also about the related aviation industry.

Research work to determine the prospects for the aircraft carrier program begins now and will last until the end of 2023. Its results will be announced in less than a year, after which the industry will receive the corresponding orders and begin to fulfill them. Despite all the delays and difficulties of recent times, she will have enough time to meet the previously announced deadlines.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -8
    17 March 2023 05: 00
    I am just curious...
    Why, having a fairly developed electronics industry in the countries of the West and Southeast Asia, did they not ask themselves the question of creating an aircraft carrier with a UAV?
    Known reconnaissance and strike drones capable of performing tasks at the level of ...
    The time is not far off when the speed of drones will increase due to the use of jet engines ...
    And the use of kamikaze shock drones does not require landing ... Equipped, launched and wait ...
    For some reason, the creators of aircraft carriers continue to ignore the ability of hypersonic weapons to turn large-sized marine objects into trash ...
    This is a stated fact...
    1. +9
      17 March 2023 06: 04
      … South Korea is about to design and build its first aircraft carrier…

      ---REASONS: To protect the merchant / oil fleet ... As a demonstration of the capabilities of the military-industrial complex, coupled with the Korean 5th generation fighter ... with further access to the export market ... Taking into account the development of the Japanese Navy ... Taking into account the proximity to the DPRK and the PRC and a possible center of conflict in Asian region.

      —-HHI presented a project for an aircraft carrier with a length of 270 m and a displacement of 60,000 tons. He received a flight deck 60 m wide. The number of fighters to compete with DSME is at least 28, the speed is at least 27 knots. Plus UAVs > 7. For comparison, the latest "Gerald Ford", Aviation Wing ~90 aircraft (~75), plus UAVs and helicopters. EM catapult. Length - 337 m. Width - 78 m. Height - 76 m. Draft - 12 m. Deck - 25. Speed ​​> 30 knots. Total displacement - 112,000 tons. Assigned to Atlantic Fleet, to the restored 2nd Fleet (North Atlantic, with a probable entry into the Barents Sea ..!!), port of registration - Norfolk, Virginia.

      —- What can I add: of course, one must envy silently, because they will build it !!!
    2. +7
      17 March 2023 08: 18
      Quote: ROSS 42
      For some reason, the creators of aircraft carriers continue to ignore the ability of hypersonic weapons to turn large-sized marine objects into trash ...
      This is a stated fact...

      At least one drowned???
      That's when they sink, then there will be a "fact".
      1. -4
        17 March 2023 17: 10
        Quote: Doccor18

        At least one drowned???
        That's when they sink, then there will be a "fact".

        You, young man, wanted to "take me away"?
        The hypersonic weapon ("Zircon") in Russia went into production in 2023, if my memory serves me right.
        Can you tell me when and where the aircraft carrier of a foreign country threatened the sovereignty of the Russian Federation? Wasn't there such a thing?
        Now, when it begins to threaten, then it will sink ... Or do you have doubts?
        Me and the American don't have...
        1. +2
          17 March 2023 21: 44
          Quote: ROSS 42
          You, young man, wanted to "take me away"?

          I didn't want to "get away" from you. Only "facts" for that and facts, that they are reality, and not someone's speculation or Wishlist. When they drown, then you will repeat about the "facts".
          Where did you see the young man? When I was a young man, the country was different ... Although, it's nice, damn it, a long time ago no one called it that ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
    3. -1
      April 27 2023 19: 10
      For some reason, the creators of aircraft carriers continue to ignore the ability of hypersonic weapons to turn large-sized marine objects into trash ...


      Well, for example, because so far not a single "hypersonic prodigy" has turned a single real goal into trash yet?

      Apparently, for some reason, the creators of aircraft carriers do not believe that hypersound gives complete invulnerability to an attacking missile. Maybe they are, of course, just fools, or maybe they really know something about this hypersound?
  2. -1
    17 March 2023 05: 36
    And why does South Korea need a full-fledged aircraft carrier? Where will he be poisoned to swim and with whom will he fight? In my opinion, this is the usual "divorce for grandmas" of Koreans by the American military-industrial complex, tk. the planes are planned to be American.
    1. +7
      17 March 2023 05: 54
      Quote: Amateur
      And why does South Korea need a full-fledged aircraft carrier?

      South Korea with the strongest shipbuilding base can easily build aircraft carriers for export. Any displacement. Well, a trial one, you can say "technology demonstrator" for experience. hi
    2. -3
      17 March 2023 05: 56
      And then the great Eun will not calmly look at this.
      Surely it will start to buzz with an increase in the power of nuclear weapons.
    3. +6
      17 March 2023 07: 00
      Quote: Amateur
      In my opinion, this is the usual "divorce for grandmas" of Koreans by the American military-industrial complex,

      And not only for grandmas, in the future, excellent auxiliary forces are obtained for the American VM group (since the Korean aircraft carrier cannot have "its own" tasks in principle)
    4. +5
      17 March 2023 08: 24
      Quote: Amateur
      And why does South Korea need a full-fledged aircraft carrier?

      R.Korea is a true ally of the democrats, who will nevertheless collide with the Chinese in the sea. And the fleet will decide everything. That is why both AUKUS and Japan are completing two aircraft carriers, and Korea will be connected. Indeed, together with two British ones, there will already be 16 aircraft carriers under the command of the Democrats, and the Chinese are guaranteed to be in the minority ...
    5. +6
      17 March 2023 09: 55
      South Korea is an advanced and powerful navy. They are building 3 new Sijon, that is, doubling their number (3 are already in the line-up and it seems that the lead one will soon be refitted with the replacement of a number of systems to the level of the Sijon under construction). And Sizhon is still the most armed destroyer in the world today (144 missiles of the main types, without packages and completed RIM116)


      Frigates with an electric ship of 12 knots (that is, a quiet search PLO move) are built at a Chinese pace and delivered immediately in pairs. Let me remind you that the Navy will not have such technologies in the foreseeable future, because everything is very bad with 20386, and it was planned to work out the pilot plant on it with a quiet electric run.


      Submarines with ballistic missiles in separate mines and VNEU.


      Moreover, they are developing the next generation VNEU + Samsung makes new batteries.
      Work on the creation of a new type of air independent power plant (VNEU) for submarines was carried out by DSME together with the South Korean companies H & Power and KTE under a contract issued in December 2018, based on the methanol reforming technologies developed by ADD. At its Siheung pilot plant, DSME said it "successfully completed the entire process from functional and performance testing to final component evaluation using state-of-the-art equipment such as control panels and gas analyzers."
      The hydrogen obtained in this VNEU by reforming methanol in a mixture with water after its purification is used in fuel cells to generate electricity. It is stated that this type of VNEU "has high efficiency in power generation, has no noise and vibration and does not emit foreign substances other than water."


      They have an expeditionary force in two large UDC.


      An aircraft carrier is a logical stage in the development of the fleet. Well, Koreans are now mastering even industries unfamiliar to themselves. For example, they were going to make a medium truck to replace Hercules and compete with Embraer. The UAE has already entered with money.

      Therefore, making an aircraft carrier, and even signing their planes there, is a super logical step in the dynamics of the development of their military-industrial complex.
    6. +5
      17 March 2023 12: 58
      Quote: Amateur
      And why does South Korea need a full-fledged aircraft carrier?
      South Korea builds about 50% of the world's tonnage, civil.
      And now they want to enter the military market, most likely.
      Will build for the USA.
  3. +2
    17 March 2023 10: 48
    For Korea, this is a logical step. But the question is why, having increased the dimensions of the vessel (including the width and length of the deck), they did not use this one to create another corner deck. Then it would be possible to simultaneously carry out hacking and landing operations. And so, with one straight deck, just one thing.
  4. -3
    17 March 2023 11: 51
    On behalf of the command of the Korean People's Army, I approve the construction of an aircraft carrier in the protectorate.
    I allow the construction of not one but several aircraft carriers even more and more expensive.
    The protectorate fleet, even without aircraft carriers, is the most useless thing in the world, but at the same time the most profitable order for American business and its South Korean compradors.
  5. +1
    17 March 2023 19: 57
    Why is R. Korea building an aircraft carrier? Because it can!
  6. -1
    20 March 2023 11: 29
    Quote: acetophenon
    why is R. Korea building an aircraft carrier? Because it can!

    Of course, South Korea cannot build any aircraft carrier, destroyer, corvette, or boat.
    She is only a performer of other people's orders with someone else's technology and nothing more. If someone overseas provides technology and a ship orders a ship.
    1. -1
      April 27 2023 20: 44
      She is only a performer of other people's orders with someone else's technology and nothing more.


      You seem to have insufficient knowledge of South Korean technology.
      For your information, they have been building nuclear power plants of their own design for a long time, and you are right here, they are also building nuclear power plants on order in other countries (as well as we are).
      Only their latest reactor, the APR-1400, is already more powerful than our best reactor, the VVER-1300.
  7. 0
    10 June 2023 03: 59
    And what for South Korea in general an aircraft carrier. Well, they will sink it, both the North Koreans and the Chinese.
    A couple of rockets...
  8. 0
    26 August 2023 12: 14
    With their demographics, they will recruit a crew of old people.