Volga aircraft carriers of the Civil War

38
Volga aircraft carriers of the Civil War
On the deck of the Volga "aircraft carrier" "Commune"


Civil war - the most acute form
resolution of accumulated social contradictions
inside the state.

Wikipedia

History civil wars. The two most significant civil wars are the War of the North and the South in the United States of 1861-1865. and the Civil War between Whites and Reds in Russia in 1918–1922. left behind an indelible memory. Including about what technical means it was conducted.



Interestingly, despite the difference in almost everything, there is a very real similarity between these two wars: the use of the industrial potential of large cities. In the United States, he was involved in the creation of river and sea battleships, which carried out the sea and river blockade of the southern states. In Russia, river steamers armed with cannons cannot be compared with the battleships of the northerners and southerners. Apparently, neither the level of development of industry in the Volga region, nor the military needs here were such as to bring to life the appearance on the Volga of ships similar to the "brown water battleships", although the Volga warships were armored with bales of cotton.

But on the other hand, the industrial potential of the center was used for the construction of armored trains, which played an extremely important role in the defeat of the White Guards, although they also had armored trains.

But here's what's curious, although battleships were not built on the same Volga, it was there that aircraft carriers were used, which were more in line with the then requirements of the time. Our story is about them today...

And it happened that as soon as the Volga-Caspian military flotillahow airplanes were given to her. But where were they based?

We decided that there is nothing better than transporting them on a large oil barge, and launching them from the water, since these were seaplanes - flying boats designed by Grigorovich M-9.


Seaplane M-9 on the water

No sooner said than done. The oil barge "France", renamed the "Commune", was converted into an aircraft carrier. Moreover, not only 6 M-9 seaplanes, but also three wheeled Nieuport-17s were placed on the deck of the barge. It was so long and spacious!

From the point of view of technology, the most difficult thing was to ensure the descent of seaplanes into the water and, accordingly, their return to the barge. The simplest, although not the best solution, turned out to be cranes. With their help, the aircraft was hooked with cables to the wings and taken overboard, after which it was lowered into the water, from which it took off.

On other barges, on the sides or stern, gentle wooden descents into the water were arranged, along which flying boats were pushed into the water, and upon return they were pulled onto the deck. In the Volga-Caspian flotilla, thus, four barges were converted into "aircraft carriers".

The length of the same barge "Commune" was 139,77 m with a width of 19,08 m. The mast and pipes protruding from the deck for pouring oil into Tanks were removed from her. They came up with for greater convenience of descent of aircraft to fill part of the hull compartments with water. At the same time, the draft increased, and the wooden gangways warmed up more strongly. The descent of the aircraft was carried out by a team of 10 people.

It is interesting that the red sailors also took care of arming this barge in case of an attack by enemy aircraft: two 37-mm anti-aircraft guns and several machine guns were installed on it.

The barge "Freedom" had a length of 104,9 m and a width of 15,9 m and could accommodate six M-9 aircraft. The descent and recovery of aircraft from each side was carried out by two rotary cranes.

On the third barge "Poseidon" (94,5 m by 15,22 m) a wooden descent was arranged at the stern. To launch aircraft into the water, the aft compartments of the barge were filled with water, and it settled so that the aircraft could be pushed into the water without much difficulty.

A big drawback of all Soviet Volga aircraft carriers was the lack of hangars on them. The planes were open on the decks and exposed to the elements, which led to their rapid wear. Therefore, in 1919-1920. at the Sormovo plant, the Death barge (length 153,7 m, width 23,5 m) was equipped with hangars. Her upper deck was cleared of all protruding parts, sewn up with boards and two wooden hangars were placed, accommodating up to 10 M-9 flying boats. There was enough space between them to take planes out of them and launch them along the slipways.

Since all the Volga aircraft carriers were not self-propelled, they had to be towed by towing ships attached to them, which, of course, affected their speed, especially when the ships had to go up the Volga, that is, against the current. They were in tow behind the "aircraft carriers" and a goose barge, on which there were ammunition for aircraft.


The appearance of the barge-aircraft carrier. Drawing from the magazine "Model Designer" No. 10, 1981

It should be noted that although there were not so many aircraft based on aircraft carrier barges, they actively participated in the battles with the White Guards. First of all, they flew out for reconnaissance, which helped to identify white batteries camouflaged on the right bank, covered with dense vegetation, which caused a lot of trouble to the red ships.

Having found out the location of the battery, the pilots often bombed it themselves, dropping small bombs on them, and fired from machine guns, but most importantly, they transmitted its coordinates to the floating batteries, armed with large-caliber guns, which shot the positions of the whites from afar.

And they could not successfully respond to their fire, since, as a rule, they had only 76,2-mm cannons from the Obukhov plant.


Volga belyana. For some reason, it never occurred to anyone that on the basis of this vessel it is possible to create a completely unsinkable aircraft carrier for wheeled airplanes ...

Second view weapons, very widely used at that time, were combat arrows. They were counted in pounds, loaded into special boxes, or even just bags, and, gaining height, dumped their contents overboard. When falling from a height of about a thousand meters, the arrow acquired such speed that it pierced, hitting the head, through a person sitting on a horse. Enemy airplanes also suffered great damage if they were able to lie in wait at the airfield. Arrows pierced through them and easily disabled their equipment.

And, of course, our red warplanes dropped leaflets on the enemy. This was considered an important part of combat work, and sometimes bombs, arrows, and leaflets were dropped almost simultaneously in one flight.

The Whites liked the idea of ​​the Reds, and at the beginning of the summer of 1919 they decided in Perm to convert the Danilikha wooden barge into an “airplane”. They equipped it with a hangar into four sections, each of which housed one M-9 aircraft. The hangars were closed on both sides with light wooden gates sliding along the rails. The descents also moved along the rails, which were attached to the sides. Since the slopes slid along the sides, they could be moved to any desired section, which, of course, was very convenient.

But this air barge did not have to make war. Already in July 1919, the Danilikha in Perm was captured by the Reds, and then, retreating, they simply burned it.


Belyana model in the Saratov Museum

Although the Civil War ended, its experience came in handy in 1928, when the Whirlwind turret gunboat was converted into a non-self-propelled air transport on the Amur, on which four MP-1 seaplanes were based. They named him "Cupid".

The deck was cleared of superstructures, leaving only the armored wheelhouse. And for the planes they arranged a large hangar. In addition, warehouses and workshops were equipped, and living quarters for personnel. It is interesting that the rear wall of the hangar, which leans down on cables, served as a slipway for launching aircraft into the water.

But in 1933, the Amur was renamed again, this time to the Far Eastern Komsomolets, and again turned into a gunboat.


The personnel of the 68th river squadron against the background of the Amur aircraft

But nevertheless, the aircraft based on the "Amur" contributed to the fighting of the Red Army in the area. They flew out several times to bombard the positions of the "White Chinese", and during the landing of the Red Army troops on the shore, they scattered the enemy cavalry detachment with machine-gun fire, trying to attack the paratroopers.

It is clear that the armament of the scouts was very weak, but, be that as it may, the enemy, who did not expect an attack from the air, suffered serious losses.

True, in the future, the experience of creating river aircraft carriers based on oil barges clearly did not justify itself, and during the Great Patriotic War nothing of the kind was created either on the Volga or in other places. Enough and ground airfields.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    8 March 2023 04: 14
    I read an art book at school, I don't remember the name. Just about these steamboats. I remember the name of one of the ships "Volgar-volunteer".
    1. +9
      8 March 2023 07: 48
      Surprisingly, I have not seen separate works on the topic of the Volga "aircraft carriers". Even in good works on the river fleet - a maximum of two or three paragraphs.
      So Vyacheslav Olegovich really thanks a lot for this work!
      1. +4
        8 March 2023 08: 06
        As far as I remember, there was not so much about aircraft carriers, but the story was about a young Red Navy man who served on the Volgar
    2. BAI
      +4
      8 March 2023 10: 58
      Just about these steamboats. I remember the name of one of the ships "Volgar-volunteer".

      Yes, there is such a book. I read it too and I don't remember the name.
    3. +5
      8 March 2023 17: 10
      Quote: Gagrid
      I read an art book at school, I don't remember the name.
      "Ships attack from the fields"?
      1. +4
        8 March 2023 17: 37
        But exactly. She. Thanks for the title.
  2. +12
    8 March 2023 04: 38
    Vyacheslav Olegovich, thanks for the article!
    Interesting and informative!
    1. +13
      8 March 2023 08: 40
      I join! Only the photo "will not be enough." We will help you as much as we can.
      Aircraft on the deck of the "Commune" were placed openly
      The Danilikha barge, before being converted into air transport. A serious drawback of this air barge was the low height of the hangars, because when it independently entered the ramp (with the engine running), the aircraft touched its upper beam with the ends of the propeller and broke the propeller.
      1. +14
        8 March 2023 08: 45
        And here is the main character of the article close-up
        Floating aircraft hangar "Amur"
        A wheeled tug with a steel hull "Strong" was attached to the "Amur". Displacement 190 tons, length 55,70 m, overall width 16,60 m, Compaund steam engine with a power of 450 hp, full speed (without a cart) 19,5 km / h, cruising range at an economic speed (17,5 km / hour) 684 km. Built in 1910 at the Kuntsevskaya Shipyard (Nizhny Novgorod), was part of the Amur Flotilla, in 1918 captured by the Japanese and taken (1920) to Sakhalin in 1925 returned to the USSR, in 1926 reclassified as a minelayer.
  3. +9
    8 March 2023 04: 44
    Volga belyana. For some reason, it never occurred to anyone that on the basis of this vessel it is possible to create a completely unsinkable aircraft carrier for wheeled airplanes ...
    Maybe because it occurred to me that it would definitely not become fireproof ...
    1. 0
      8 March 2023 07: 58
      Raw, freshly sawn wood burns very badly.
      1. +7
        8 March 2023 10: 23
        Quote: kalibr
        Raw, freshly sawn wood burns very badly.

        It also actively dries out, changing its size and shape. To make an aircraft carrier for the season, in which the whole team will continuously fight for survivability, the author, as usual, gushing with searchlights.
        1. 0
          8 March 2023 12: 51
          Quote: Ivan Ivanych Ivanov
          It also actively dries out, changing its size and shape.

          And the deck of the "Commune" from the boards did not dry out and did not change sizes?
          1. +4
            8 March 2023 14: 11
            This deck was certainly not made from damp wood, there are no fools. And the conversation is about the Belyany corps from the damp forest. Belyan was made for 1 time, just to swim. Water was pumped out of it continuously. Good aircraft carrier? She looks like an aircraft carrier - any first-grader will confirm. But to be and to seem are different things, any adult should understand this. The unsinkability of Bielany is not bad, but due to the internal volume (filled with damp forest), which is not needed on an aircraft carrier? There is no talk about stability at all. In general - as usual - "7 parallel red lines in the form of a cat"
      2. +7
        8 March 2023 11: 16
        Quote: kalibr
        Raw, freshly sawn wood burns very badly.

        Got worse? And about very bad - no need for fairy tales. A problem can also ignite, but it burns very well.
        1. -1
          8 March 2023 12: 54
          And how would the whites kindle it? Cans of kerosene dropped from airplanes? Then why didn't they throw them at ordinary "aircraft carriers"? There were also wooden hangars, wooden decks, planes ... plywood - I don’t want to burn!
          1. +4
            8 March 2023 15: 15
            Quote: kalibr
            And how would the whites kindle it? Cans of kerosene dropped from airplanes?
            White? Gasoline without "white" things in itself is extremely flammable, if you suddenly don't know ...
            And so, bombs based on shells for a three-inch gun could be both HE (melinite or TNT) and incendiary.

            Quote: kalibr
            Then why didn't they throw them at ordinary "aircraft carriers"?
            Maybe because they didn’t throw anything at all on air transport. Or because the "whites" had much less aviation.


            Quote: kalibr
            There were also wooden hangars, wooden decks, planes ... plywood - I don’t want to burn!
            The ship itself is not. And on a metal ship, fighting a fire is difficult, but quite possible. Unlike wood.
            In general, it is much easier to burn a wooden ship than to sink it. The slow-witted Bolsheviks understood this, unlike you.
            1. 0
              8 March 2023 15: 26
              Quote: Vladimir_2U
              Maybe because they didn’t throw anything at all on air transport. Or because the "whites" had much less aviation.

              And why then would they throw Bielany on an aircraft carrier? And there is no mention of the use of incendiary bombs anywhere. Small fragmentation and arrows - that's all that both sides had.
              1. +4
                8 March 2023 16: 44
                Quote: kalibr
                And why then would they throw Bielany on an aircraft carrier?
                In your opinion, the only cause of the fire could be bombing from the air? The fact that there could be shelling, on a river ship, an elementary fire in the hangar - do you completely rule it out? Oh yes, and no one set the task - to destroy air transport.

                Quote: kalibr
                Small fragmentation and arrows - that's all that both sides had.
                A fragmentation bomb - in fact, it is quite capable of setting fire not even to aviation gasoline, but to wooden structures, with a TNT explosion temperature of more than 2000 gr.Ts. Well, no one set the task of destroying air transport. And then after all, incendiary bombs are not too more complicated than high-explosive fragmentation ones. And in the Republic of Ingushetia they were actively developed, as were the shells.

                By the way, the failure of Belyany as a warship is not only in its instability to fire, no matter how you persist in the opposite, and not even in its spontaneous deformation, but also in its enormous weight for its size. These belyany were built only for rafting DOWN the river, if you know what I mean ...
                In general, the slow-witted Bolsheviks were technically much more savvy than you.
                1. 0
                  8 March 2023 18: 51
                  Quote: Vladimir_2U
                  These belyany were built only for rafting DOWN the river, if you know what I mean ...

                  I had a big article here on VO about Belyany, where I told everything about them in detail. https://topwar.ru/109846-belyana-pochti-gotovyy-avianosec-dlya-volgi.html
                  1. 0
                    9 March 2023 04: 09
                    Quote: kalibr
                    Here on VO I had a big article about Bielany, where I told everything about them in detail.

                    Retelling and understanding are not the same thing.
                    1. +2
                      9 March 2023 10: 15
                      Shpakovsky only to "retell", and as soon as questions on the merits begin, immediately: "I am an artist, I see it that way" lol
              2. +1
                9 March 2023 15: 51
                Quote: kalibr
                why then would they start throwing Bielany on an aircraft carrier?

                Not everything is so simple, Vyacheslav Olegovich.
                A naval aircraft carrier, when raising its wing, goes against the wind. The speed of the wind, plus the speed of the ship itself, makes it possible to reduce the take-off speed of the aircraft and thus get by with a shorter take-off deck.
                But even so, take-offs were often and densely lacking and the plane fell into the sea. With "Belyana" you definitely can't do such a trick.
                In addition, we (that is, in the RIF) did not really have aircraft carriers at sea, we managed by air transport.
                In general, between a beautiful and simple solution, they chose a proven one)
                Quote: kalibr
                And there is no mention of the use of incendiary bombs anywhere.

                So you can’t do them on your knee in large numbers either, but frankly, with the chemical industry in Tsarist Russia ... not good request
                1. PPD
                  0
                  23 May 2023 09: 38
                  In addition, we (that is, in the RIF) did not really have aircraft carriers at sea, we managed by air transport.

                  And here I will argue.
                  Not air transport, but hydro-air transport.
                  And full-fledged aircraft carriers - the initial test of the pen - a little later. They were nowhere to be found in World War I then. With us, it flowed into the Civil, and even the river.
                  Small, by the way. A 1 classic aircraft carrier, Argus, late 1918.
                  One, a trial one, I can say and definitely not about Russia in the Civil.
          2. +1
            8 March 2023 17: 26
            Quote: kalibr
            And how would the whites kindle it? Cans of kerosene dropped from airplanes? Then why didn't they throw them at ordinary "aircraft carriers"? There were also wooden hangars, wooden decks, planes ... plywood - I don’t want to burn!

            After Tsushima, where there were multiple fires from Japanese land mines on ships due to wooden debris from decks, boats, furniture, etc. - on all warships they began to quickly get rid of wooden parts.
            1. +1
              8 March 2023 18: 53
              Quote: Ivan Ivanych Ivanov
              on all warships, they began to quickly get rid of wooden parts.

              It was difficult to get rid of wood on wooden Volga steamships. Even if the hull was metal, all superstructures were wooden.
              1. +1
                9 March 2023 04: 09
                Quote: kalibr

                It was difficult to get rid of wood on wooden Volga steamships. Even if the hull was metal, all superstructures were wooden.

                But on an oil barge - it's quite simple.
      3. PPD
        0
        23 May 2023 09: 31
        Not in this case.
        The point is in the very design of the whites.
        Belyany has no deck, for example.
        Large ones are made only for 1 time.
        And small ones do not last long.
        Aviation is a rather flammable thing, no matter what kind of tree it is. The point here is not that it will burn.
        Projectiles can hit, etc.
        The body dries up, it leads, it flows all the time.
        The load must be laid at a distance from the hull - by laying boards of a certain thickness, etc.
        Belyan is, in fact, a kind of raft.
        It basically doesn't fit.
        Now about the monitors, do not forget the civil war (time, effort, means), and the Volgo-Balt Canal, locks, etc. there are none.
        This is from 1937 only.
        Who will carry this monitor over the shallows, but are there a lot of them? Red haulers?
        This is not a barge to lose.
        These are full.
        That's why they didn't use it.
  4. +15
    8 March 2023 06: 29
    two wooden hangars for up to 10 M-9 flying boats.


    Here they flew on this, and even managed to fight! Sincere respect. good



    Thanks to Vyacheslav for the new article. smile
    1. +14
      8 March 2023 08: 46
      Well, yes, the MP-1 looks more impressive against its background
  5. +12
    8 March 2023 08: 00
    . The two most significant civil wars are the War of the North and the South in the United States of 1861-1865. and the Civil War between Whites and Reds in Russia in 1918–1922. left behind an indelible memory. Including about what technical means it was conducted.

    No less striking "kinship" of both wars was the struggle "for the railway."
    Here red and white in terms of ingenuity were ahead of the whole ecumene!
    Later, this experience was taken as a basis from Soviet Russia, and not from the British, Germans and French - who formally had parity with us.
    1. +11
      8 March 2023 08: 02
      Yes, our Civil War can also be called a war of armored trains! By the way, in my novel THREE FROM ENSK (the first book) It is described in detail how an armored train operates in the Civil ...
  6. +10
    8 March 2023 08: 44
    The second type of weapon, very widely used at that time, was combat arrows.

    The invention of French engineers - flashette. True, the French themselves practically did not use them, but Germany and Russia used them widely. The Germans on their flechettes, which they dropped on the French, sometimes wrote Invention francaise, fabrication allemande (invented in France, made in Germany). Such dark Teutonic humor.
    During the war in Korea and Vietnam, the Americans revived the idea by creating the Lazy Dog kinetic aviation munition.
  7. +13
    8 March 2023 08: 53
    They flew out several times to bombard the positions of the "White Chinese", and during the landing of the Red Army troops on the shore, they scattered the enemy cavalry detachment with machine-gun fire, trying to attack the paratroopers.
    Not only horse-drawn machine guns were driven.
    The flagship of the Chinese flotilla is the gunboat Jiang Hong.
    It is interesting to note that until 1944 (the air defense cruiser Niobe, 3512 tons was destroyed) this ship was considered the largest enemy warship sunk by Soviet naval aviation.
    On October 17, the Shanghai press reported the defeat of a Chinese military flotilla on the Songhua River, three gunboats sunk and four damaged, and 1000 sailors killed. For active participation in the defeat of the Chinese militarists, by a decree of the Central Executive Committee of the USSR of March 23, 1930, the Far Eastern Fleet was awarded the Order of the Red Banner of War, and the pilots did not bypass the awards.
    Pilots of the 68th detachment, after being awarded the Orders of the Red Banner (on the left, E.M. Lukht, who received the second order)
  8. 0
    8 March 2023 20: 58
    And before "Danilikha" did ours have any fleet on the Volga?
  9. 0
    18 March 2023 04: 17
    Muy interesante articulo. Gracias por escribirlo
  10. 0
    19 May 2023 19: 15
    Recently I read Alexei Ivanov's new novel Armored Steamers - it just describes these events in the Volga and Kama regions.
    1. 0
      5 June 2023 17: 12
      A copy of the order, grandfather was a captain, went ashore during the civil war, during his absence the ship was sunk.