Foreign air defense systems in Ukraine: forced disarmament

45
Foreign air defense systems in Ukraine: forced disarmament
Ukrainian S-300 system in position. Precision-guided munitions will soon follow. Spring 2022. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation


Since February last year, foreign partners have been regularly sending various kinds of assistance to Ukraine in the form of arms and equipment. A significant share in such deliveries is made up of anti-aircraft weapons of various classes and types. Portable missile systems, self-propelled guns with small-caliber artillery, etc. were transferred to the Kyiv regime. It was expected that such products would help Ukrainian formations protect themselves from Russian aviation and missiles, but this did not happen.



At the first stage


At the beginning of last year, against the backdrop of a general deterioration in the military-political situation, the United States and NATO countries expressed their readiness to help the Kyiv regime with the supply of certain types of weapons and other property. Already in January, foreign partners and patrons began shipping such aid. These shipments reportedly contained only weapon defensive purpose, incl. anti-aircraft weapons.

At the beginning of last year, the United States handed over several hundred FIM-92 Stinger portable air defense systems to Ukraine. In the future, several more large batches of such products were delivered. In addition, Washington allowed foreign partners, such as the Baltic countries, to re-export their MANPADS. In total, according to various estimates, several thousand Stingers were provided to Ukrainian formations.


One of the British Stormer HVM air defense systems. Photo Telegram / BMPD

To help Ukraine, a number of European countries have removed from their arsenals the old Strela-2 and Igla MANPADS that have remained with them since the Cold War. For example, Germany shipped approx. 1500 Strel-2. Several hundred more of these products had to be disposed of due to damage due to improper storage conditions. The UK has provided hundreds of Starstreak MANPADS.

In mid-March, the American press reported that the US and NATO had prepared and sent a batch of Soviet-style air defense systems to the Kyiv regime. It included the Osa and Strela short-range systems, as well as the S-300 systems of an unspecified modification. The exact composition of this batch and the number of products were not called. Arrival in Ukraine was expected in the very near future.

In early April, it became known about the secret delivery of S-300 air defense systems from Slovakia. It was reported that the Slovak army gave away its only system of this type in exchange for an American promise to provide Patriot air defense systems. Already at the end of the month, the Patriots arrived in Slovakia, but at the beginning of January 2023 they were removed from duty and sent for service abroad.


ZSU Gepard. Photo Telegram / "Vestnik PVO"

In the first weeks and months of hostilities, the US and NATO transferred anti-aircraft weapons to Ukraine from storage or from the presence of their armies. At the same time, preference was given to Soviet-style systems. The fact is that the Ukrainian side would not have to master them from scratch, and besides, they made it possible to partially restore the destroyed air defense system. At the same time, NATO MANPADS were shipped, which were simple in terms of development.

Foreign samples


By the end of spring 2022, it became clear that European countries could no longer supply Soviet-style air defense systems. To continue such assistance, they would have to seriously reduce the existing air defense fleet and, accordingly, create a threat to their own security. In this regard, the question arose of supplying NATO-standard equipment to Ukraine from the presence of other states.

So, already in April, the UK announced its intention to provide the Kyiv regime with Stormer HVM self-propelled air defense systems armed with Starstreak missiles. Despite all the assurances, the equipment arrived in Ukraine only in July, and only five vehicles and a supply of missiles for them were shipped. They are no longer going to send new Stormers.


NASAMS launcher. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

The United States provided similar assistance in the summer and autumn. They sent Avenger self-propelled air defense systems to Ukraine. These complexes are built on the basis of a common auto-chassis and are armed with Stinger missiles.

In the summer, Germany promised to provide three dozen Gepard anti-aircraft self-propelled guns. The preparation of the delivery of this equipment and ammunition for it was delayed. The first cars arrived in Ukraine only in August, and it took several more weeks to complete the deliveries.

Thus, foreign partners practically used up their stocks of Soviet-style anti-aircraft weapons and were forced to supply equipment of American or European design. At the same time, the pace and volume of such assistance, for a number of reasons, turned out to be limited. There was no talk of restoring the previous number of air defenses.

Curiously, in the summer and autumn of 2022, talks began about the need to restore a full-fledged layered defense system, which the Russian army destroyed earlier. It was proposed to form it at the expense of foreign-made radar and anti-aircraft weapons. However, such plans are still far from being realized - both due to insufficient supply volumes and due to constant pressure from the Russian side.


ZAK Skynex combat module on a transport vehicle. Photo Rheinmetall AG

New Challenges


In early October, the Russian armed forces began to launch regular strikes against critical military and dual-use infrastructure. Massed strikes using missiles and strike UAVs have become a new serious challenge for the suppressed Ukrainian air defense. Even with a certain number of foreign systems, it could not have a noticeable effect on the results of strikes.

In connection with regular strikes, new deliveries of air defense systems began already in October-November. In particular, several systems promised back in the spring have finally been handed over to Ukraine. Norwegian NASAMS air defense systems, German IRIS-T, as well as Skyguard Aspide and HAWK from Spain were received and deployed. At the same time, the total number of such complexes was again small, and only certain areas were covered with their help.

Against the backdrop of Geranium strikes, Ukraine received new promises. So, last year, France and Italy announced their intention to manufacture and transfer to it several SAMP / T air defense systems and ammunition for them. In early February, it was reported that the enterprises of the two countries were collecting the necessary funds and would be able to send them to the Kyiv regime within one and a half to two months.

In December, the long-standing dreams of the Ukrainian leadership came true - the United States promised to provide it with several batteries of Patriot air defense systems. Later, it was reported about the search for equipment to send, about the imminent start of training in calculations, etc. However, deliveries of "Patriots" have not yet begun, and the American side has not even named their approximate dates yet.


American SAM Patriot, Photo by Wikimedia Commons

Also in December, it became known about Germany's intention to provide a pair of Skynex artillery systems. A few days ago, they announced the transfer of the first such product. In addition, a similar complex of an older Skyguard model could be transferred with it. Several more such ZAKs are expected in the future.

Forced disarmament


As of the beginning of 2022, the Ukrainian air defense units had hundreds of radio and fire weapons of various types and modifications. In fact, there was a layered defense system built according to Soviet standards. However, already in the first days of the Special Operation, the Russian army broke this system into separate elements with precise strikes and then began to knock out the remaining components.

Foreign partners tried to help the Kyiv regime with the supply of various anti-aircraft weapons, but the results of these deliveries are far from desirable. Thus, the Lostarmour service reports that over the past year, NATO countries and the United States transferred to Ukraine only 80 "large" anti-aircraft systems. In addition, we should recall several thousand MANPADS of different models and different ages. Such imports could only partially cover the losses of Ukrainian formations.


Shooting SAM SAMP/T. Photo Missilery.info

According to the latest data from the Russian Ministry of Defense, to date, our army has destroyed more than 400 anti-aircraft missile systems and their means of various types and classes. Even if some such targets still need to be repaired and rebuilt, the deadweight loss remains extremely high. It is also known that the Ukrainian units spent a significant part of the received MANPADS, and many of these products became a trophy of our troops.

It is easy to see that the rate of destruction of Ukrainian air defense is significantly higher than the rate of restoration of damaged equipment and the receipt of new foreign weapons. At the same time, the possibilities of foreign partners are reduced, and they cannot supply the required number of products in the shortest possible time. Moreover, it is not clear whether this situation can be changed in the future.

Thus, the process of demilitarization is gradually going beyond the borders of Ukraine. The Russian army has successfully suppressed the Ukrainian air defense and is now destroying its remnants. Foreign states are helping the Kyiv regime to restore air defense, but their products are also under attack. At the same time, some foreign countries, helping Ukraine, were forced to reduce their own air defense - with understandable negative consequences for themselves and for NATO.
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    6 March 2023 05: 05
    It is necessary to improve the ways and methods of destroying foreign air defense in Ukraine ... now the battlefield there is a testing ground for Russia, where our Armed Forces are successfully practicing new methods of combating enemy air defense ... this pleases.
    1. +11
      6 March 2023 05: 34
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      our Armed Forces are successfully working out new methods of combating enemy air defenses ... this pleases.

      Well, yes, well, yes ... especially considering that already at the end of February 2022 it was lying around that the Ukrainian air defense and air force were completely destroyed. wassat
      As for this article, I didn't like it. negative
      It seems that the topic is interesting and relevant, but somehow depressingly stated, common phrases and tops. negative
      Bongo wrote about Ukrainian air defense in a much more interesting way.
      1. +7
        6 March 2023 06: 36
        Quote: Tucan
        Well, yes, well, yes ... especially considering that already at the end of February 2022 it was lying around that the Ukrainian air defense and air force were completely destroyed.

        Not destroyed (about air defense), but suppressed.
        In part, it could look like this, because all the stationary and early reconnoitered positions of the air defense system and radar were destroyed. But it turned out that some of these destroyed targets (and a lot) turned out to be false (both air defense systems and combat aircraft), and many air defense systems were dragged and deployed in residential areas of cities. Plus, many air defense systems began to operate using the "ambush" method on external target designation from NATO control and tracking equipment.
        But nevertheless, in the first couple of months, most of the air defense systems of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were knocked out and NATO had to urgently start supplying all the available Soviet heritage in this part, collecting and buying all over the world. And when there was nothing more to buy, they had to supply their own air defense systems. Moreover, the author is right - these funds are knocked out faster than new ones arrive.
        In fact, in a year, the SVO of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation has already destroyed the air defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine twice, despite the fact that by all standards (despite a certain archaism) it was a rather powerful air defense system - layered and very saturated. Much stronger than Iraq's air defense, when a huge coalition of NATO and the Middle East fought against it.
        In addition, the total suppression of air defense, even in one direction, is justified precisely when this is done in order to ensure the success of a large-scale offensive. The RF Armed Forces, starting from April, essentially stopped advancing, reduced the LBS by about one and a half to two times and began storming individual cities in the Donbass.
        And the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation were not going to maintain a database of this magnitude. The special military operation was named that way because it had completely different goals and tasks, which turned out to be inaccessible already in March. The situation required rethinking and defining new goals and objectives with the sequence of their achievement. A kind of evolution of long-term plans.
        Now we can state that the war will be protracted, with the transformation of the entire world order on planet Earth through it. No more, but no less. The conflict has become global and existential. At the same time, we will change, the West will change ... and these changes are already underway and will continue.
        Victory will, of course, be ours. But the main events are yet to come.
      2. +17
        6 March 2023 06: 50
        Quote: Tucan
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        our Armed Forces are successfully working out new methods of combating enemy air defenses ... this pleases.

        Well, yes, well, yes ... especially considering that already at the end of February 2022 it was lying around that the Ukrainian air defense and air force were completely destroyed. wassat
        As for this article, I didn't like it. negative
        It seems that the topic is interesting and relevant, but somehow depressingly stated, common phrases and tops.

        I didn't like it either. Firstly, the Europeans are testing their air defenses in a real war and against a very serious enemy. Such an experience is worth a lot. Secondly, the air defense of Ukraine, with the help of these supplies, managed not only to reduce the effect of missile attacks on the rear, but also to cover the front line from the bomber aircraft of the Aerospace Forces.
        1. 0
          6 March 2023 07: 43
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          I didn't like it either. Firstly, the Europeans are testing their air defenses in a real war and against a very serious enemy. Such an experience is worth a lot.

          So, after all, the Aerospace Forces are gaining experience in combating the latest NATO air defense systems.
          The point in the article is that a very numerous (without any equivocation) layered air defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was already destroyed in fact twice. Not only the vast majority of Ukrainian air defenses were ground, but almost everything that could be found in the world of Soviet and Russian production. Now only NATO systems are being supplied. And they grind just the same.
          Why are massive "complete suppression" operations not undertaken?
          Because this is done only to ensure a general offensive. Otherwise, it's like conducting a powerful artillery preparation with grinding the front line and near rear ... but without a subsequent offensive. I think everything has its time. And both sides are now gaining experience.
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          With the help of these supplies, the air defense of Ukraine managed not only to reduce the effect of missile attacks on the rear, but also to cover the front line from the bomber aircraft of the Aerospace Forces.

          The easier it is to remove the entire signature characteristic of these means, to adapt your electronic warfare and electronic warfare means, to work out tactics for identifying such means and defeating them.
      3. +1
        6 March 2023 07: 59
        The suppression of the air defense system and "that the Ukrainian air defense and air force have been completely destroyed" are somewhat different situations.
        1. +9
          6 March 2023 08: 51
          According to the article: "Fresh tradition, but hard to believe." Yes
      4. +10
        6 March 2023 12: 42
        hi
        Bongo wrote about Ukrainian air defense in a much more interesting way.

        Of course.
        Offhand, from what has already "arrived" or "is going" Crotali, Pyrouny, Mistrals, Polish versions of the OSA and C125, BUK-Sparrow are not even mentioned.

        Since the site needs "life-giving clickbait" the following should be noted:
        "It is easy to see that the rate of destruction of Ukrainian air defense is significantly higher than the rate of restoration of damaged equipment and the receipt of new foreign weapons."The question, of course, is debatable ....

        "Thus, the process of demilitarization gradually goes beyond the borders of Ukraine"The most important thing is not to point your finger in the direction where he goes ....

        "...some foreign countries, helping Ukraine, were forced to reduce their own air defense - with understandable negative consequences for themselves and for NATO"
        Hmm, and what are the negative consequences for Norway, which gave away the decommissioned Mistrals? Sweden took over Norway again?
        Or from Slovakia, which gave away the C300? Did the Czech Republic drag her back to Czechoslovakia?
        Are Alsace and Lorraine being taken away from France, which Crotali gave away?
        But the most interesting question, by the way: "Why will some foreign countries, after the end of the NMD, need layered air defense in particular and strong aircraft in general?" With whom in Europe, for example, will Poland fight, which will change Soviet tanks and artillery for an incredible number of modern Korean tanks and self-propelled guns, and even with the F35? To knock out reparations from Germany?

        PS. Rule of thumb for starting a good internet discussion: give the wrong answer to a question...
      5. +9
        6 March 2023 16: 07
        Bongo is a specialist in the field. Ryabov is a writer of letters in the correct order.
    2. +7
      6 March 2023 12: 54
      Destroying the air defense of Ukraine is a rather difficult task. To suppress is not to destroy. Sometimes they write "destroyed by the Buk air defense system." However, the complex includes a detection locator, a command post and an anti-aircraft missile launch battery, which consists of several fire launchers. And all these elements of the air defense system are located in different places, and one even three missiles cannot destroy them. Those. it is quite difficult to completely destroy the air defense system. Even if something is destroyed, then one can be assembled from two air defense systems. Not to mention the repair and stock.
      1. 0
        6 March 2023 19: 10
        Quote: Alexey Lantukh
        Sometimes they write "destroyed by the Buk air defense system." However, the complex includes

        why do stupid journalists write like that?
        An anti-aircraft missile system (SAM) is a set of functionally related combat and technical means that ensure the solution of tasks to combat enemy aerospace attack means.

        The composition of the SMC in the general case includes:

        means of transporting anti-aircraft guided missiles (SAM) and loading the launcher with them;
        missile launcher;
        anti-aircraft guided missiles;
        means of reconnaissance of an air enemy;
        ground interrogator of the system for determining the state ownership of an air target;
        missile controls (may be on the missile - when homing);
        means of automatic tracking of an air target (may be located on a missile);
        means of automatic missile tracking (homing missiles are not required);
        means of functional control of equipment;


        If the SOU was destroyed, then it should be written that way. Why waste paper in vain?
  2. 0
    6 March 2023 05: 36
    Thus, the process of demilitarization is gradually going beyond the borders of Ukraine. The Russian army has successfully suppressed the Ukrainian air defense and is now destroying its remnants. Foreign states are helping the Kyiv regime to restore air defense, but their products are also under attack. At the same time, some foreign countries, helping Ukraine, were forced to reduce their own air defense - with understandable negative consequences for themselves and for NATO.
    . Come on, the NATOs will survive without air defense ... the Kukuevskys, that is, and it does not allow the use of aviation as it should. Let it be for now...
  3. -4
    6 March 2023 05: 47
    It will never be possible to completely suppress air defense. Throwing full-fledged aviation there and losing a certain number of aircraft and pilots is what our enemies need, but not us. Aircraft and pilots are invaluable, since in the event of a more serious conflict, they must be available in the maximum number. Therefore, we must continue to rely mainly on missile strikes and use aviation very carefully. Which is what is being done at the moment.
    1. +20
      6 March 2023 05: 57
      Excuse me, I am personally an infantry and your words about the pricelessness of pilots and aircraft do not affect me from the word at all. About a serious conflict.
      Do you think that now the army is busy with something not serious, like fighting diarrhea, or are there databases being conducted?
      1. +1
        6 March 2023 13: 01
        Apparently, the time for attacking positions by assault by planes and helicopters has already passed. The time has come for guided missiles, missiles and air bombs. And they are not enough.
    2. +2
      6 March 2023 06: 25
      Planes and pilots are priceless,

      They are very expensive for the country. Remove them from the air defense system and send them home for salaries, let them practice pitching at home airfields. For some reason, they are at war with Prigozhin, and the VKS picks a finger in the nose and gets good salaries.
      more serious conflict

      It doesn’t get more serious, and if it’s more serious, then if they are afraid of Ukrainian air defense, then NATO air defense is even more so. A disgrace ... without aviation it is impossible to suppress the artillery defense of Maryinka and Avdiivka, and the supply of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, affecting the roads, and even more so. Even the commercials have ceased to be shown with "cabration".
      1. +2
        6 March 2023 09: 01
        Today in the news they showed how Su-25 missiles were somewhere out there. I really don't know how fresh these shots are.
  4. -6
    6 March 2023 05: 51
    Quote: Tucan
    already at the end of February 2022, it was lying around that the Ukrainian air defense and air force were completely destroyed.

    And that the air defense and air forces of Ukraine can somehow stop the rocket attacks on our airborne forces ...
    all the same, you need to be more objective ... the massive attacks of the Aerospace Forces on our part achieve goals ... it’s another matter that the General Staff and the Kremlin assign targets of secondary importance.
    Priority targets such as the government, the Rada, various state institutions, key transport infrastructure, etc. were not attacked and destroyed ... this is the fault of the Kremlin politicians. request
    The war is not going according to the classical scenario.
    1. 0
      6 March 2023 08: 43
      There is no war, we have been told by the NWO to put aside all talk and think at-two and march to the left.
      Well, I doubt the edge of the general non-professionalism of generals of all stripes and ranks (of course they can, however), with the word politicians rule.
      Well, popular on electrical systems. tired so popular, for example, at the junction stations, ruin the bridges in Zaporozhye boringly (otherwise it seems like counter-attacks are cracking there) so do what you were once taught in schools with the word hope dies last.
  5. +10
    6 March 2023 06: 10
    An article from the series "It remains to win a little bit." Better not to read - nothing new, but annoying.
  6. +6
    6 March 2023 06: 31
    They destroyed air defense in Ukraine in such a way that our planes huddle to the ground, instead of covering everything with 6-7 km of cast iron
  7. -5
    6 March 2023 06: 50
    deliveries of "Patriots" have not yet begun, and the American side has not even named their approximate dates yet.
    By analogy with the Abrams and F-16s, which fits into the American tactic of forcing the Europeans to fork out and disarm.
    1. +9
      6 March 2023 07: 27
      Quote: rotmistr60

      By analogy with the Abrams and F-16s, which fits into the American tactic of forcing the Europeans to fork out and disarm.

      ...and rearm. So more precisely.
  8. +8
    6 March 2023 07: 10
    Here's a wishful thinking example. If what was said in the article had taken place (in terms of the destruction of Ukrainian air defense), then our aviation could regularly fulfill its direct duties. But, unfortunately, the raids of our aircraft are episodic and, to be honest, not very effective. We do not have freedom of movement in Ukrainian airspace. No. Some launches from the cabriolet of unguided missiles, what are they worth! I highly doubt their effectiveness. Where is the targeted bombing? All this suggests that the air defense system of Ukraine is by no means destroyed. And, in general, this is a big and painful topic. It is not disclosed in the article, even partially.
  9. 0
    6 March 2023 07: 19
    Unmanned kamikaze drones have proven themselves well.
    These drones are good at knocking out field equipment and, of course, air defense systems that cover the battle formations of the Ukronazis.
    The author did not mention the latest deliveries from the Wehrmacht, two modern air defense systems Skynex and Skyranger, taken from the cover of Berlin.
    How, Our forces will be able to neutralize - these systems?
  10. +1
    6 March 2023 07: 22
    It is easy to see that the rate of destruction of Ukrainian air defense is significantly higher than the rate of restoration of damaged equipment and the receipt of new foreign weapons.
    Alas, it is DIFFICULT, especially on the battlefield, our aviation, having failed to maintain air supremacy obtained in the early days of the NWO, still cannot capture it again ... With general air superiority
  11. -9
    6 March 2023 08: 19
    Don't care! Destroy enemies! I remember Dad was at the training camp, he said, from the MTLB "type" the hand rises, and the MANPADS flew. Only not so long ago I saw it in action. I spent 2 years underground at the command post of the 60th Air Defense Defense Corps, security and support, so I didn’t see it. This is, if anyone will be clever.
  12. +2
    6 March 2023 09: 26
    Here in Syria there was complete dominance in the air. And here, a year later, everything is somehow not observed. Massive raids by cruise missiles and drones, for air supremacy, can be recognized very conditionally
    1. +4
      6 March 2023 10: 35
      Here in Syria there was complete dominance in the air. And here, a year later, everything is somehow not observed. Massive raids by cruise missiles and drones, for air supremacy, can be recognized very conditionally

      There were partisans in Syria, but here is a real army. Also, you don’t hear about the “brilliant” tank carousel ... they got burned
      1. 0
        6 March 2023 11: 28
        Quote: Konnick
        There were partisans in Syria, but here is a real army.

        Well, the blacks were quite organized for themselves - with tanks, artillery, etc. And if not for Russia, Iran and the West, the armies of Syria and Iraq would not have coped with them
  13. -2
    6 March 2023 10: 04
    If we discard those S-300s that still survived, and which have a range of 70 km, then only air defense systems and medium-range air defense systems remain, but closer to its minimum ranges. In addition, they are all object. Self-propelled only "stormers", which are generally a cross between MANPADS and DB air defense systems.
    1. +2
      6 March 2023 16: 14
      Self-propelled Beeches are more difficult to detect and hit, apparently a lot is still left, so they transmit mainly object and MANPADS (which are consumables)
  14. +12
    6 March 2023 11: 43
    Classic article by Mr. Ryabov.
    Brief retelling:
    The air defense of Ukraine is broken, there are few air defense systems supplied, and they are bad.
    But shelling in depth is carried out exclusively by cruise missiles and shaheeds - we will omit this laughing
    1. +3
      6 March 2023 14: 57
      Soon there will be an article on how effective Mtlb with guns from above, and how ineffective and outdated Strikers and Bradleys
    2. -1
      6 March 2023 19: 14
      Quote: spirit
      Brief retelling:

      That way you won't earn your own bread. Ryabov will not let you lie, but where
      At the first stage
      ..
      Doubtful prospects
      Predictable future

      ?
  15. +1
    6 March 2023 12: 22
    Interesting material. And what is the statement “the air defense system of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has been destroyed.” And where is at least a link to the source? Even the Ministry of Defense no longer talks about the air defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine destroyed. maybe a "Cinderella" in the back? everything. The question is where are the rest, where are the destroyed "Cheetahs, IRIST and others. There is no information. The statements of our experts are also surprising. Ukraine is not able to create a layered air defense, along the entire front. , and even with a shortage of these very air defenses. It is easier and cheaper to create an objective air defense with "ambush" actions, which is the delaboration of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. I draw your attention to the fact that our carriers did not have time to launch NATO already reports an air raid. And then those or other areas ty of Ukraine. This already speaks of the high interaction between intelligence and data transfer directly to the consumer, and this is at least the Armed Forces of Ukraine, at least emergency services. Here is the answer about our aviation and not the effectiveness of the strikes of the Kyrgyz Republic.
    1. +4
      6 March 2023 15: 37
      Quote: Mikhail Maslov
      And what is the statement "the air defense system of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has been destroyed." And where is at least a link to the source? Even the Ministry of Defense


      “The Ministry of Defense reported that the air defense systems of Ukraine were suppressed

      09: 03 24.02.2022
      https://ria.ru/20220224/ukraina-1774651412.html
  16. +2
    6 March 2023 13: 58
    Thus, the process of demilitarization is gradually going beyond the borders of Ukraine. The Russian army has successfully suppressed the Ukrainian air defense and is now destroying its remnants.
    Well, yes, so our Air Force is forced to act very carefully above / near the LBS, and kamikaze UAV strikes along with cruise missiles do not always achieve their goals ...
    Quote: Volunteer Marek
    Here's a wishful thinking example.
    ...
    Quote: spirit
    Classic article by Mr. Ryabov.
    Brief retelling:
    The air defense of Ukraine is broken, there are few air defense systems supplied, and they are bad.
    But shelling in depth is carried out exclusively by cruise missiles and shaheeds - we will omit this laughing

    That's right!
  17. +2
    6 March 2023 19: 06
    Quote: Ryabov Kirill
    Forced disarmament

    In this way, the process of demilitarization is gradually going beyond the borders of Ukraine. The Russian army has successfully suppressed the Ukrainian air defense and is now destroying its remnants. Foreign states are helping the Kyiv regime to restore air defense, but their products are also under attack.

    belay
    This author cannot be read without tears. And there are no more tears...
  18. +1
    6 March 2023 21: 01
    Our enemies have an interesting saying, translated something like this: "The proof of the existence of pudding is the ability to eat it."
    Proof of the suppression of Ukrainian air defense is the ability to freely bomb objects, including those behind enemy lines, including cheap cast-iron bombs with many sorties per day.
    Somehow this is not observed from the word "absolutely".
  19. +2
    6 March 2023 21: 38
    Of course I understand, cheers and all that. Only now I have two questions for the author: why don’t our bombers still hang over the territory of Ukraine 24/7 and don’t pour cast iron on everything that moves? Does our front-line aviation consider the launch of NURSs from a pitch-up as the main technique?
  20. +4
    6 March 2023 22: 09
    ABOUT! New achievement: I guessed the author without reading the article, one title at a time.
  21. -2
    7 March 2023 09: 21
    Quote: Aron Zaavi
    ..and rearm. So more precisely.


    Instead of 3-4 "leopards" - for one "abrams"?
    We have nothing against such "re-equipment".
  22. +3
    7 March 2023 17: 47
    Sorry, but the usual "useless and obsolete" closing sentence is missing. Without this explicit article does not satisfy me wink
  23. 0
    April 13 2023 00: 30
    Well, judging by that. that reports of bombing attacks began to appear more and more often, the air defense of the Ukrofascists was thinned out. Unless it's massive konashenkoism, of course.