Finnish radar airspace control and on-site air defense systems: past, present and future

31
Finnish radar airspace control and on-site air defense systems: past, present and future

Until the early 1960s, the Finnish air defense system was basically at the level of 1944. Anti-aircraft artillery used guns from the Second World War, and outdated radars were used to control the airspace. A serious strengthening of Finnish air defense took place in the 1970s, after large-scale deliveries of Soviet radars, anti-aircraft guns and missile systems, in parallel, communications and radar equipment were purchased from Sweden, France and Great Britain. Cooperation with Russia in the field of air defense systems ended in the late 1990s, after which Finland began to acquire only Western anti-aircraft systems.

Radar means of airspace control


During the Second World War, the Finns received the German FuMG 450 Freya and FuMG 62 Wurtzberg 39 radars, which were used to detect air targets and adjust the fire of 88-mm anti-aircraft guns.




Radar FuMG 62 Wurtzberg 39

The 450 kW FuMG 20 Freya radar operated in the 162-200 MHz frequency range and could detect approaching bombers at ranges up to 180 km.


Radar FuMG 450 Freya

In total, Finland received two German Freya radars. For their time, these were quite advanced radars, but their use in the post-war period was complicated by a shortage of spare parts and not high operational reliability.

In the mid-1950s, it became clear that the badly worn German radars needed to be replaced, and Finland purchased several American AN/TPS-1E surveillance radars from the UK, which were used for airspace monitoring and air traffic control.


Radar AN/TPS-1E

Although the first modification of this station appeared at the end of World War II, the AN / TPS-1E radar was considered quite modern at the time of purchase. The AN / TPS-1E radar had a pulse power of up to 500 kW and operated in the 1220-1350 MHz frequency range. The detection range of a large target flying at an altitude of 10 km reached 200 km. In general, it was a successful acquisition, the AN / TPS-1E radar, which received the name Tepsu in Finland, served until the second half of the 1980s.

In 1955, a prototype of a stationary three-coordinate VRRVY radar with movable antennas operating in the vertical and horizontal plane was created in Finland.


VRRVY radar antennas

The station had a pulse power of up to 400 kW, operated in the decimeter frequency range and could detect air targets at a distance of up to 270 km. A total of 10 VRRVY radars were built. Their operation continued until the end of the 1970s.

In the 1970s, deliveries of Soviet mobile two-coordinate radars P-15NM and P-18 began.


Radar P-15

The hardware-antenna complex of the P-15 low-altitude radar is located on the ZiL-157 cargo base. The decimeter range radar with a pulse power of 270 kW was able to control the air situation within a radius of 140 km. An experimental calculation ensured the deployment of the station in 10 minutes.

The P-18 meter range radar was a further development option for the widespread P-12 station and was distinguished by a new element base, increased performance and more comfortable working conditions for operators.


Radar P-18

The station is based on two Ural-375 vehicles. On one side there is a van with electronic equipment and operator workplaces, on the second - an antenna-mast device.

In Finland, the P-18 radars were used as standby stations. The detection range strongly depended on the altitude of the air target. So, at an altitude of 20 km, a fighter-type target, in the absence of organized interference, could be detected at a distance of 260 km, and at an altitude of 0,5 km - 60 km.

The operation of Soviet-made mobile radars continued until the end of the 1990s, after which they were replaced by the Giraffe 100 and Giraffe Mk IV radars purchased from Sweden. Radars with an antenna on a telescopic mast are placed on the chassis of Sisu SK 242 off-road trucks and Sisu Pasi XA-185 armored personnel carriers. Radars on a cargo base are intended for use in object air defense, and on an armored personnel carrier chassis - for military air defense.


Three-coordinate mobile stations made in Sweden received the name LÄVA in the Finnish armed forces. They operate in the 2-4 GHz frequency range and are capable of detecting targets at ranges up to 180 km.


In the late 1970s, the KEVA78 radar was created in Finland. A number of sources say that this station has much in common with the French station TA-23, developed in the 1960s by Thomson-CSF.


Antenna post radar KEVA78

The KEVA78 radar is mobile and transported by several trucks. The antenna is mounted on a mast about 15 m high, which makes it possible to detect targets flying at low altitude. The pulsed power is about 2 MW. Operating frequency range: 1-250 MHz. The maximum detection range is about 1 km. A total of 370 radars of this type were built. The last KEVA300 station was decommissioned in 18.

Finland currently operates five stationary TRS-22XX KAVA, supplied by Thomson-CSF in 1993-1995 and upgraded several years ago. All stations of this type are installed on concrete bases, their antennas are protected from adverse meteorological factors by radio-transparent domes.


The TRS-22XX KAVA three-coordinate radar has a pulse power of up to 700 kW, operates in the 2,9-3,1 GHz frequency range and is capable of seeing large high-altitude objects at a distance of up to 470 km.

In May 2009, a contract was signed with Thales Raytheon Systems worth 200 million euros for the supply of 12 GM 403 mobile three-coordinate radars. All stations of this type were to be transferred before the end of 2015.

The GM 403 radar has a frequency range of 2,9-3,3 GHz and a detection range of large high-altitude targets up to 450 km. Radars GM 403 are based on the most modern element base and have high reliability, the ability to quickly upgrade and update software. Particular attention is paid to the characteristics of the detection of low-altitude targets in the conditions of electronic countermeasures. All radar equipment is placed in a container-type module and can be transported by S-130 aircraft.


Radar GM 403

The Ground Master GM 403 radars are mounted on the chassis of the Finnish SISU E13TP vehicle with an 8x8 wheel arrangement. In Finland, Ground Master GM 403 radars form the backbone of the country's airspace monitoring system, replacing 18 obsolete Finnish-made radars. In the armed forces of Finland radar GM 403
received the name KEVA2010.

Object anti-aircraft missile systems


10 years after the end of World War II, it became clear to the Finnish military-political leadership that it was impossible to protect the capital region from air strikes with anti-aircraft guns alone. However, in the 1950s, Finland did not have the financial resources necessary to acquire a modern weapons. Such an opportunity appeared by the mid-1960s, and simultaneously with the acquisition of jet interceptors, a search began for an air defense system capable of fighting bombers outside the line of sight and adapted for long-term combat duty.

At a certain stage, the Finnish military was interested in the British Thunderbird medium-range air defense system. The complex, which entered service in 1958, had good data: an aimed launch range of 40 km and an altitude reach of 20 km. The main advantage of the British semi-active radar-guided anti-aircraft missile was the use of solid fuel, which made it easier and cheaper to operate. This was a significant achievement, the Soviet medium and long-range anti-aircraft missiles created in those years had liquid-propellant jet engines that ran on toxic fuel and an aggressive oxidizer.

In the late 1960s, a preliminary agreement was reached on the supply of a British air defense system, and the British handed over a set of equipment for the preparation of calculations, including training anti-aircraft missiles of the Thunderbird Mk I modification, without fuel and warheads.


Training anti-aircraft missile Thunderbird Mk I at the Air Defense Museum in Tuusula

In 1968, the production of an improved Thunderbird Mk II model was already underway, and the British company English Electric was seriously counting on a large contract. However, at the last moment, the Finns refused to purchase a British air defense system. For what reason this happened, I could not install. Perhaps the parties did not agree on a price. Currently, individual elements of the Thunderbird Mk I air defense system are on display at the Air Defense Museum in Tuusula.

In 1980, the Finnish Air Defense Forces were reinforced by the Soviet S-125M Pechora air defense system with 5V27 solid-fuel missiles. This very successful low-altitude complex had a zone of destruction in range of 2,5-22 km, and in height - 0,02-14 km.


Launcher ZRK C-125M in the Museum of Air Defense in Tuusula

In total, Finland acquired three anti-aircraft divisions and 140 missiles. The first S-125M division, which received the Finnish designation Ito 79, was deployed in the vicinity of Helsinki. In 1984, with Soviet technical support, the Finnish S-125Ms were upgraded. The service of the S-125M air defense system in Finland ended in 2000. Subject to modernization and refurbishment, the Finnish Pechora complexes could still serve.

After the collapse of the USSR, military-technical cooperation between the countries continued for some time. In 1997, three batteries of the Buk-M1 air defense system (18 self-propelled guns and ROMs, 288 9M38 missiles) were delivered to Finland to pay off the state debt of the USSR. At that time, it was a completely modern multi-channel complex capable of hitting targets at a distance of up to 35 km and an altitude of 22 km.


Self-propelled firing system 9A310M1 from the Finnish air defense system "Buk-M1"

Although the Buk-M1 mobile air defense system was created for the air defense of the Ground Forces, in Finland it was used as an object-based medium-range air defense system. The Buk-M1 anti-aircraft missile regiment was permanently stationed in the northern suburbs of Helsinki. Anti-aircraft batteries were not on permanent duty, but one battery was constantly in readiness for immediate exit to positions.

The service of the Buk-M1 air defense system in the armed forces of Finland turned out to be short-lived. In 2008, it was announced that Russian systems were being abandoned. This was motivated by the fact that the air defense systems supplied by Russia, which had served only 10 years, no longer meet modern requirements and are too vulnerable to Russian electronic warfare, and the control systems of the complexes can be easily taken under control from the outside. Given the events in Ukraine, where the Buks are actively used by the warring parties, these statements are completely far-fetched and do not correspond to reality.


There is no clarity regarding the future fate of the Finnish Buk-M1 air defense systems. One self-propelled firing system is on display at the Air Defense Museum in Tuusula. According to unconfirmed reports, elements of the Buk-M1 air defense system that were decommissioned in Finland were delivered to the American training grounds Eglin, Nellis and Fort Stewart.

Shortly after abandoning the Buk-M1 air defense system, Finland acquired the NASAMS II medium-range air defense system, developed by the Norwegian company Kongsberg Gruppen together with the American Raytheon. The $458 million contract, which began in 2009, provided for the delivery of three anti-aircraft batteries. In the armed forces of Finland, NASAMS II received the designation Ito 12.


Launcher SAM Ito 12 on the transporter Sisu E13TP

The NASAMS II air defense system is capable of effectively combating maneuvering aerodynamic targets at a range of 2,5–40 km and an altitude of 0,03–16 km. As a means of destruction, specially modified long-range aviation missiles AIM-120 AMRAAM.


To detect air targets and control the fire of an anti-aircraft battery, a multifunctional three-coordinate radar AN / MPQ-64 F2 X-band is used, with a detection range of 75 km.

Finland received expanded complexes with increased fire performance and a large number of target designation and detection tools. The battery of the Finnish NASAMS II air defense systems includes: 6 AN / TPQ-64 radars instead of three and 12 launchers instead of 9, an MSP500 optoelectronic reconnaissance station on the chassis of an off-road vehicle, an FDC battery control center and a GBADOC mobile communications center that allows you to integrate into the upper echelon network to exchange information.

The MSP500 optoelectronic reconnaissance station is equipped with a high-resolution television camera, a thermal imager and a laser rangefinder, which makes it possible to use anti-aircraft missiles without turning on the radar. The AN / MPQ-64 radar, launchers and optoelectronic stations can be deployed at a distance of up to 2,5 km from the control center. One NASAMS battery is capable of simultaneously tracking 72 targets. Each launcher has 6 TPKs with missiles, thus, the battery has 72 anti-aircraft missiles ready for use.

Experts note that NASAMS II is a fairly advanced and effective air defense system that poses a great danger to any air enemy. During the development of this air defense system, much attention was paid to increasing stealth, noise immunity and survivability in modern combat conditions. To do this, the AN / MPQ-64 radar has a mode with a highly directional beam and an advanced radiation control function, which reduces the risk of disclosing the position of the complex.

Prospects for the development of air defense in Finland


The central command post of the Air Force-Air Defense of Finland is located at the Tikkakoski-Jyväskylä air base, regional command posts are located at the air bases of Rovaniemi and Kuopio. At present, a network of permanently operating radars has been deployed in Finland, providing a continuous radar field at high and medium altitudes over the entire territory of the country.

Although the application for joining the North Atlantic Alliance was submitted in 2022, as part of mutual cooperation since 2006, Finnish radars have been integrated into the NATO air defense system. The exchange of information is carried out using equipment operating in the Link-16 format.

Currently, the Ministry of Defense of Finland is considering the acquisition of additional radars capable of effectively detecting cruise and ballistic missiles, as well as working in conjunction with promising long-range air defense systems. A specific type of radar has not yet been selected, but the media write that, most likely, it will be the Israeli Elta ELM-2084 or the American AN / TPS-77 station from Lockheed Martin.

In 2023, the Finnish Defense Directorate must make a choice regarding the acquisition of a long-range air defense system worth more than $1 billion. According to the Finnish military, they urgently need to be armed with several anti-aircraft missile batteries with a range of destruction of aerodynamic targets of about 100 km. Among the possible applicants were considered SAMP-T air defense systems with Aster-30 and Patriot PAC-3 + missiles with Guidance Enhanced Missile-TBM missiles (mainly for hitting air targets), Missile Segment Enhancement anti-missiles. However, at present, the systems offered by the Israeli companies Israel Aerospace Industries and Rafael Advanced Systems are considered the main favorites.

The Barak-MX system from IAI with the LRAD ER missile and radar equipment from Elta is capable of fighting air targets at a distance of up to 150 km, the reach in height is 30 km.

The David's Sling system, developed by Rafael and Raytheon, also contains Elta radar equipment. To defeat aerodynamic and ballistic targets, Stunner and SkyCeptor missiles are used. Depending on the missile used and the type of target, the firing range is 40–300 km.

To be continued ...
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    1 March 2023 03: 41
    I think it’s good that the Finns no longer bought modern Russian air defense systems and radars, firstly they would have ended up with dill, and secondly they would have been sent to the states for study, in general, of course, they can send NASAMS II, but they don’t have so many of them, and they cost expensive, so keep it for yourself.
    1. +1
      1 March 2023 11: 41
      Quote: Codett
      they didn’t buy modern Russian air defense systems and radars, firstly they would end up with dill, and secondly they would be sent to the states for study

      1. It's strange why Russian / Soviet weapons without permission are found in all sorts of "dill / states", but American / German / etc. without permission are not.
      Switzerland forbade Germany to supply ammunition to the memory "dill", or leopards again.
      Can you ask (and strictly) from the one who signed the military-technical cooperation agreements and for the supply? Isn't there cash in $ for missed paragraphs?
      2. Finns observed etiquette.
      and without Finns, there was someone to ship the latest S-300 air defense systems to the USA ("fraternal" Belarus and Kazakhstan), and the "dear Russians" themselves almost sent them.
      3. With Ukaina, until recently (approximately 2012) there was an excellent military-technical cooperation, R-36M2 and project 11356 Tamala frigates will not lie.
      ------------------------------------
      I guess that's bad. Because it's better to have a neighbor at your side with Russian weapons, and not with American ones.
  2. +6
    1 March 2023 03: 55
    The article is good as usual! hi

    This was a significant achievement, the Soviet medium and long-range anti-aircraft missiles created in those years had liquid-propellant jet engines that ran on toxic fuel and an aggressive oxidizer.
    In fairness - at that time, LRE for missiles worked noticeably longer and thereby provided greater maneuverability over a greater distance.
    1. +14
      1 March 2023 04: 17
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      In fairness - at that time, LRE for missiles worked noticeably longer and thereby provided greater maneuverability over a greater distance.

      Hello!
      It's not about maneuverability, which is determined by the efficiency of aerodynamic rudders and the speed of steering machines.
      LRE has a higher specific impulse and can control the amount of thrust. But at the same time, the LRE is much more complicated, more expensive. Long-term operation of air defense missiles with rocket engines is a rare smut.
      A solid-propellant engine for missiles is much more preferable, another question is that the USSR was much inferior to the United States in creating effective solid fuel formulations. The American Nike-Hercules air defense system with solid-propellant missiles was put into service in the 1950s. We were able to achieve a comparable range of missiles on a turbojet engine about 20 years later.
      1. 0
        1 March 2023 04: 54
        Quote: Bongo
        It's not about maneuverability, which is determined by the efficiency of aerodynamic rudders and the speed of steering machines.

        Rudders - rudders, but as the fuel burns out, the speed begins to fall, and, accordingly, the ability to energetic maneuvers too. There is a dependency.

        Quote: Bongo
        Long-term operation of air defense missiles with rocket engines is a rare smut.
        Especially with the oxidizer on board...


        Quote: Bongo
        that the USSR was much inferior to the USA in creating effective solid fuel formulations
        Undoubtedly.
      2. +7
        1 March 2023 07: 07
        Sergey, good morning, at least with us. wink

        "Nike-Hercules" I remember from childhood, and the name and appearance - a beautiful rocket.


        I remember that there was also Nike-Ajax, but I don’t know what the difference is between them, alas, they used only signal rockets. smile
        Big hello and best wishes to Olga. love
        1. +7
          1 March 2023 10: 17
          Quote: Sea Cat
          Sergey, good morning, at least with us.

          Kostya, hello! Glad you got out of the ban and you're back with us! drinks
          Quote: Sea Cat
          I remember that there was also Nike-Ajax, but, alas, I don’t know what the difference is between them

          American anti-aircraft and anti-missile systems of the Nike family

          https://topwar.ru/169154-amerikanskie-zenitnye-i-protivoraketnye-kompleksy-semejstva-najk.html

          Quote: Sea Cat
          Big hello and best wishes to Olga.


          Thank you! She was worried about you, asking where you disappeared.
      3. 0
        1 March 2023 10: 11
        The USSR was much inferior to the USA in the creation of effective solid fuel formulations.

        I think this is because we considered LRE to be more promising .. The USSR worked with solid fuel for a long time - only Katyushas were worth something. But - at some point they decided that, let's say, ampulization of fuel to a rocket engine - it could well solve the problems of storage and maintenance .. And the advantages of liquid fuel were quite obvious ..
        1. +8
          1 March 2023 11: 00
          Quote: paul3390
          I think this is because we considered LRE to be more promising.

          No, they didn't. No. The level of the chemical industry in the USSR in the 50s and 60s did not allow mass production of effective solid fuel formulations. This applied to both missiles and ICBMs and SLBMs.
          Quote: paul3390
          But - at some point they decided that, let's say, ampulization of fuel for a liquid-propellant rocket engine - it may well solve the problems of storage and maintenance.

          Tell me, on which missile was ampulization used?
          Quote: paul3390
          And the advantages of liquid fuel were quite obvious ..

          The only "+" LRE is a higher specific impulse. This is true for launch vehicles and partly for ICBMs. LRE is not suitable for mass missiles. I also found the S-75 and S-200 air defense systems and I can imagine how many difficulties there were with the operation of their missiles.

          The refueling of liquid missiles, due to the use of toxic fuel and an aggressive caustic oxidizer, took place like this, and the neglect of protective equipment led to very serious consequences.
        2. +3
          1 March 2023 23: 41
          Quote: paul3390
          The USSR worked with solid fuel for a long time - Katyushas alone were worth something.

          This is not it. There seems to be berthollet salt, aluminum or magnesium powder and sodium chlorate, or, which is unlikely: ballistic (nitroglycerin pressed
          Thanks to the professor of the Mikhailovsky Artillery Academy, Colonel Ivan Platonovich Grave hi
          PS with gunpowder (any) in the Republic of Ingushetia, the USSR has always been "not very", but in the Russian Federation it's generally a disaster. Hunters who used Russian cartridges will not let you lie.
          With mixed fuels, solid propellant rocket engines are also not very good (in the USSR, the Pavlograd Chemical Plant was in the lead, it is in Ukraine).
          Quote: paul3390
          But - at some point we decided that let's say fuel ampulization

          ICBM R-7 (R-7A), R-16 (R-16U) and R-9A - low readiness for launch (from 30 minutes to several hours),
          low survivability: with one nuclear strike, the enemy could immediately disable 2-3 launchers with missiles.
          (compact basing of 2-3 silos at the starting position along with refueling systems, launch control equipment and routine maintenance, command post, barracks and headquarters.
          This state of affairs brought the entire Soviet missile program to a standstill: on the one hand, due to the technical features of these missile systems, only a preemptive nuclear missile strike from our side was possible, which was unacceptable for military-political reasons. On the other hand, the mass deployment of these missiles and the achievement of quantitative parity with the United States became impossible for economic reasons.
          So in 1963, V.N. Chelomey and OKB-52 "turned out", offering "external" and "internal" ampulization.
          It is easier to do this on missiles (stupidly welded shvof is an order of magnitude smaller, and the tube is also an order of magnitude easier to seal), but in terms of the impact / cost ratio, it is not economically feasible.
          Although the Iud of the TTTRD is 30% worse than that of the LRE ... tempting, but expensive.
          Increase Iud, the only way out is the chic and best in its time 3M9 or Sea Dart (preferably Mod 2) ....

          The truth can helium will help than they can. But it is not exactly. Solid propellant rocket engines for missiles completely occupied the niche.
      4. +4
        1 March 2023 11: 45
        Quote: Bongo
        Long-term operation of air defense missiles with rocket engines is a rare smut.

        Well, TG-02 with nitric acid is another gift, but at least not UDMH. smile
      5. +1
        1 March 2023 11: 51
        Quote: Bongo
        It's not about maneuverability, which is determined by the efficiency of aerodynamic rudders and the speed of steering machines.

        maneuverability in the atmosphere is determined by the vector V, its magnitude, design overloads and onboard su.
        You can make arbitrarily large mugs of aerodynamic rudders, but after the solid propellant rocket charge burns out after 8-12 seconds, the speed of the missiles will drop:
        Fresist=Cf* ro*V^2*S/2
        and the higher the speed, the more quadratic, and the lower, the faster (but not linearly)
        any Maevr, even more.
        pilots will not let you lie: what should be done when turning to la? -> "give gas"
        As a result: if the target "failed", turned away or went up, the probability of a miss increases.
        That is why the RVV MBDA Meteor will lay on the blades both the 120th and the R-77. although it is not a rocket engine, it’s just that the active area is many times larger.

        The solid propellant rocket engine has an undeniable advantage: gigantic thrust, and the simplicity of the "engine" and operation.
        But we need a very developed chemical industry.
        But now the issue is quite easily solved with hemorrhoids from fuel with liquid propellant rocket engines.
    2. +5
      1 March 2023 05: 28
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      In fairness - at that time, LRE for missiles worked noticeably longer and thereby provided greater maneuverability over a greater distance.

      This is a controversial issue what
      For example, during the combat use of S-75 air defense missiles during intensive maneuvering, they were often crushed from overload, while this did not happen with the S-125. Rockets with liquid-propellant rocket engines are, of course, heavier than those with turbojet engines, but it’s not correct to say that the type of engine fundamentally affects maneuverability.
      1. 0
        1 March 2023 06: 34
        Quote: Tucan
        For example, during the combat use of S-75 air defense missiles during intensive maneuvering, they were often crushed from overload, while this did not happen with the S-125.

        For the first time I hear, but suppose that it was so, does this eliminate the need for maneuvering? Although comparing missiles with a twofold mass difference is so-so.
        Quote: Tucan
        to say that the type of engine fundamentally affects the maneuverability in my opinion is not correct.
        I don't say that, I say that
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        LRE for missiles noticeably worked longer and thus provided greater maneuverability over a greater distance ...
        ... Rudders - rudders, but by fuel burnout speed starts to drop, respectively, and ability to energetic maneuvers.

        There is a very big difference between your words and mine.
        1. +6
          1 March 2023 10: 39
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          For the first time I hear, but suppose that it was so, does this eliminate the need for maneuvering?

          American and Israeli pilots, having timely noticed the launch of the S-75 air defense system, carried out an intensive anti-missile maneuver with a large overload. This very often made it possible to evade missiles. Often, when manually tracking a target, the air defense system operator did not have time to react, or a missile trying to sharply maneuver fell apart in the air.
          As practice shows, the type of engine does not significantly affect the maneuverability of the rocket at firing distances close to the maximum. For example, the V-750 SAM of the SA-75VM Dvina complex had a firing range of 34 km, which was determined by the fuel consumption in the tanks.
          On the S-75M with SNR operating in the 6-cm private range, thanks to the use of the V-755 missile defense system with a separate power generator operating independently of the rocket engine, this figure was increased to 43 km. Those. the rocket, having flown 34 km with the engine running, went further and aimed at the target while flying by inertia. The same thing happens with solid-fuel missiles, they, having accelerated to a cruising speed of about 30% of the route, are already running out of fuel. But such a number, both in missiles with rocket engines, and in missiles with turbojet engines, passes only when firing at relatively low-maneuverable targets flying at medium and high altitudes.
          1. +3
            1 March 2023 11: 35
            Another great cycle! Thank you!
            As for the turbojet engine, in my opinion, the main problem in those days was as a plasticizer and the cracking of the fuel associated with it. We fine-tuned the technology - we also got missiles with a fairly long warranty period.
          2. +1
            1 March 2023 13: 34
            The bicaliber missiles from "Tunguska" and "Shell" can argue with the last thesis. hi
            By the time the work was completed, the engine imparted a speed of 9 m / s to the 311M900 rocket and separated approximately 2,6 s after launch. Further, its march stage (weight - 18,5 kg, diameter -76 mm) continued to fly by inertia. The average rocket speed was 600 m / s with an average available overload of 18 units.

            The average speed of ZUR-57E6E is 700 m / s, resulting from a slow start, because. the initial one is 40 m/s and lasts 2,4 seconds. Maximum speed 1300m/s. Withstanding rocket overloads of 32 g, it can be aimed at any target with a significant change in flight trajectory, making it highly maneuverable. The range of destruction is 20 km, the height is 15 km - a record in the world, these figures are three times higher than foreign analogues of anti-aircraft weapons.
  3. +4
    1 March 2023 11: 29
    hi
    As always, an interesting article!
    The NASAMS II air defense system is capable of effectively combating maneuvering aerodynamic targets at a range of 2,5–40 km and an altitude of 0,03–16 km. As a means of destruction, specially modified long-range aircraft missiles AIM-120 AMRAAM are used.

    IMHO, this is AMRAAM-EP, Kronsberg (https://www.kongsberg.com/kda/what-we-do/defence-and-security/integrated-air-and-missile-defence/nasams-air-defence-system /rayhteon-missiles) writes about her for NASAMS:
    "Range increased by 50% compared to AIM-120 AMRAAM C7.
    70% more height than the AIM-120 AMRAAM C7.
    Multiple and cluster targets
    Higher peak speed/larger "no exit" zone
    Faster achievement of the goal
    Active homing missile
    Advanced ECCM Features
    Out-of-Sight Capabilities
    Low standard of living lol (in the sense of low life cycle costs)" Sorry for Google translation. feel

    By the way, I have not found official data on the range / altitude for AMRAAM-ER anywhere.

    There is still an opportunity to put AIM9X in NASAS, Kronsberg writes about the possibility of "removing it from the plane and putting it in NASAS and back", but in one Finnish source I found that there are no Sides in the Finnish NASAMS yet.
    IMHO, strange of course, Sayd is 400 rounded units, Amraam is more than 000 units rounded.

    PS. Avengers from the USA, about which the author has already written, seem to have arrived in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In the photographs of unloading, Bradley for the Armed Forces found two rows of seven Avengers, IMHO.
    And 35mm German guns with remote detonation are also there (it is not clear in what configuration and in what quantity).
    1. +3
      2 March 2023 11: 18
      By the way, I didn’t find official range / altitude data for AMRAAM-ER anywhere

      See AIM-120 D3 data
      It is understandable:
      1. Significantly larger in diameter (on the left 120 c7, in the middle it is, on the right 9X


      2.RT has been licking aerodynamics in a specially built aero tube for almost 2 years
  4. +3
    1 March 2023 11: 33
    Simultaneously with the acquisition of jet interceptors, a search began for an air defense system capable of fighting bombers outside the line of sight and adapted for long-term combat duty.

    It’s even strange that they didn’t cling to the 2K12E “Square” with their teeth.
    The best complex of its time.
    Well, yes: it’s rather inconvenient and inconvenient, but the effectiveness fellow , the Jews will not let you lie
  5. +5
    1 March 2023 14: 28
    In 1955, a prototype of a stationary three-coordinate VRRVY radar with movable antennas operating in the vertical and horizontal plane was created in Finland.

    A little earlier, in 1952, the Finns developed the two-coordinate radar VRRVI (Viestiväline Radio Radar Valvonta Ilma).





    The disadvantage of such a system is that to obtain the third coordinate (altitude), two radars are required. Therefore, the three-coordinate VRRVY radar was developed.
  6. +3
    1 March 2023 14: 51
    For some unknown reason, the author "left behind" the sixties and the introduction of the British SR-1030 and S-2500 radars manufactured by Marconi Radar Limited and Decca Radar, respectively, into service with the Finnish air defense.

    1. +2
      1 March 2023 21: 02
      Quote: Ruyter-57
      For some unknown reason, the author "left behind" the sixties and the introduction of the British SR-1030 and S-2500 radars manufactured by Marconi Radar Limited and Decca Radar into service with the Finnish air defense

      Because Marconi Type SR1030 Is it a transmitter/receiver? It looks like this:

      Its parameters are:

      It's not like it's a radar.
      Why list all the offal in an article about the radar?
      Quote: Ruyter-57
      S-2500 manufactured by Marconi Radar Limited and Decca Radar

      Racal Decca seems to have specialized in Marine.
      I never found the Racal Decca S-2500 radar.
      "A survey of micro-wave sector scanning aerials R. Roberts, Decca Radar Company, 1967" is hard to get in British Libray.
      I will assume that you, like the 9th European Conference
      on Information Warfare and Security ECIW2010, were wrong.
      If you have any information, please share.
      About Finnish radars and smuggling and many interesting stories, but a lot was missed, but the radar + air defense article, everything will not fit, and there will be a Talmud
      1. +3
        2 March 2023 02: 17
        I will assume that you, like the 9th European Conference
        on Information Warfare and Security ECIW2010, were wrong.

        Wrong is not the right word. Following this, the Finn wrote nonsense, although he was convinced many times that such things should be checked. I had to figure it out, which took an unexpectedly long time. Interestingly, this author has a whole book, a volume of 460 pages. Given the difficulties of translating the Finnish language, the title sounds something like "History of the evolution of the Finnish Air Force". And in it, too, he, to put it mildly, "misinforms the audience."
        Digging through the archives, I found out that in 1962 the Finns bought three S 247 radars from Marconi Radar, operating in the S and L frequency bands.



        Accordingly, this radar
        Two separate transmitters are used, the S-band SR 1000 and the L-band SR 1030.

        That is, the author of the article, instead of the type of radar, indicated the type of transmitters used in it.
        At the same time, three HF200 altimeter radars were bought from Decca Radar.



        What the author meant by S-2500 - I could not install, perhaps, as in the first case, this is something from the configuration.
        Decca Radar info from http://woottonbridgeiow.org.uk/decca-legacy/appendix3.php
        By Marconi Radar - https://marconiradarhistory.pbworks.com/w/page/29024389/MARCONI%20RADAR.
        1. +2
          2 March 2023 10: 00
          Yes. This is already like the truth. I see the radar from the mugs.
          I will meet this Martti Lehto only in a year for the defense, probably.
          But, if necessary, I can hand it over with an opportunity to be poked into defamation.
          Casts a shadow on the wattle fence.
          Maybe he lied about the USSR.
          Thanks for the links.
  7. -1
    1 March 2023 18: 30
    Quote: author
    FuMG 62 Wurtzberg 39, which were used to detect air targets and adjust the fire of 88-mm anti-aircraft guns.

    Recording machine, if you consider that work began in 1937, and in 1939 already in metal.
    Only it was not a detection radar, it was a target designation radar!
    He needed a spotlight, ears, or an IR sensor (they didn’t work with him)
  8. +2
    1 March 2023 20: 48
    Yes, I remember the smut with refueling missiles on the S-75. The refueling site was about 100-150 meters from my P-12 station. If the wind was in our direction ... we all hid in the kung and closed the ventilation. A tanker died in my presence, who skimped on the PCP suit and limited himself only to a gas mask. He was doused with the remnants of the oxidizer from the hose. Well, fuel is also pure poison ...
  9. -6
    2 March 2023 12: 26
    Yes, in Finland they steal in black on military purchases, they learned from the USA.
    1. +3
      2 March 2023 14: 11
      Quote: Victor Sergeev
      Yes, in Finland they steal in black on military purchases, they learned from the USA.

      what nonsense. stop watching Skabeeva, turn off the irons, cool your head.
      The leading countries in the CPI (Corruption Perceptions Index) are Denmark (88 points), New Zealand (88 points) and Finland (88 points)

      PS
      The last lines of the CPI are occupied by Syria (13 points), Somalia (13 points) and South Sudan (11 points). Syria also ranks last in civil liberties (no ranking data for Somalia and South Sudan).
      27 countries, including Cyprus (53 points), Lebanon (24 points) and Honduras (23 points), reached their historical lows this year.
      Russia - 29

      However, for people who are not cut off from reality, there is no need for graphics
      ===============
      Corruption scandal flares up in Finland: the prime minister ate breakfast for 300 euros a month belay
      Finnish taxpayers paid 850 euros per month (75,9 thousand rubles) for the Prime Minister's food, and not 300, as previously reported by the media. belay

      “The food allowance for Sanna Marin was significantly higher than previously reported. Before that, they only talked about spending 300 euros a month on breakfast, but if you add up the Prime Minister's food allowance, the amount will be twice as much, ”Ilta-Sanomat newspaper reported on May 31, citing political aide Elisa Gebhard.
      https://www.iltalehti.fi/politiikka/a/6454bc8a-f9ef-478e-9f42-74da97687153

      So she immediately paid from her wallet request
      ----------------------
      2019 (and in my opinion 2021, 2022 as well): FFinland topped the list of countries with the happiest people in the world. This conclusion is made in the World Happiness Report 20 published on March 2019, prepared by a group of independent scientists from Canada, Great Britain and the United States commissioned by the UN.
      https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2019/#read
      The UK ranked 15th in the ranking, the US - 19th. Russia has slipped from 59th to 66th place in a year. Of the BRICS member countries, only Brazil was higher (32nd place). Of the states that were part of the USSR, Uzbekistan (41st), Lithuania (42), Latvia (53), Estonia (55) and Kazakhstan (60) were ahead of Russia in terms of happiness. Below Russia are Moldova (71st), Tajikistan (74th), Belarus (81st), Kyrgyzstan (86th), Turkmenistan (87th), Azerbaijan (90th), Armenia (116th), Georgia (119th) and Ukraine (133rd)

      The most unfortunate countries are Afghanistan (154th), the Central African Republic (155) and South Sudan (156).
      1. +3
        3 March 2023 00: 46
        Probably, the Finns also noticed the difference with their neighbor.
        And to celebrate, they began to build a fence, which should withstand "a possible accumulation of people from the east."
        "Feb 28, 17:11 pm 20
        Finland began building a "test section" of the fence on the border with Russia
        A "test" section with a length of 3 km in South Karelia is planned to be built by June. It will check whether the fence will withstand snow and frost, as well as "a possible accumulation of people from the east."
        In the fall, the Finnish Border Guard Service proposed to put up a fence in the southeastern part of the border with Russia. At the same time, it is planned to protect only 10-20% of the border (its total length is 1,3 thousand km), that is, about 130-260 km.
        https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/63fe04999a7947fb6392098e
        1. 0
          10 March 2023 22: 23
          Do you know about the Swedish fence on the border with Finland (on the Swedish bank of the border river)? From whom was it built?
          Hint here:
          https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/vasterbotten/mardhunden-stoppas-vid-finska-gransen-1
          My friend traveled there by boat - he brought pictures of the fence.
          I wonder how this fence is now? In working order? Or already worn out? Or has the Swedes already demolished it?