GLSDB missiles for Ukraine: issue resolved?

50
GLSDB missiles for Ukraine: issue resolved?
GLSDB rocket in launch configuration


Over the past few months, the foreign press has reported several times that the United States is going to transfer promising GLSDB guided missiles to the Kyiv regime. However, so far such news received no confirmation and the delivery has not started yet. Just the other day this weapon mentioned again in the context of military assistance - and in the very near future it will become known whether these reports correspond to reality.



According to unconfirmed reports


For the first time, the American news agency Reuters reported about the possible shipment of GLSDB precision-guided munitions to Ukraine at the end of November. According to him, the Boeing company, which developed it and prepared the production line, took the initiative to supply such weapons. It was noted that this is not the first proposal to launch the production of weapons specifically for deliveries to Ukraine.

According to Reuters, the US Department of Defense has received the proposal and is considering it. At the time of the news, a decision on the supply of GLSDB had not yet been made. At the same time, three unnamed sources told the agency that the first batch of such weapons could be transferred to Kyiv only in the spring of 2023.

Over the next few weeks, there were no reports of possible deliveries of GLSDB. However, in mid-January, it became known that the next package of American military-technical assistance was being prepared, and such missiles were remembered again. So, on January 18, the American publication Politico published some information about the package received from its sources.


"Combat stage" in the form of a bomb after engine separation

It was reported about the upcoming delivery of various types of armored vehicles, including Stryker vehicles, as well as a variety of ammunition. In particular, they called the shipment of GLSDB products likely. At the same time, the volumes and timing of the provision of these weapons were not named. In addition, the transfer of other long-range missile systems was excluded.

The very next day, January 19, the Pentagon officially announced the expected aid package. It included two dozen positions with a total value of approx. 2,5 billion. As expected, deliveries of armored vehicles, anti-aircraft systems and ammunition are planned. GLSDB missiles are not mentioned in the document - at least openly. At the same time, it cannot be ruled out that they were “hidden” in the line about additional rockets for HIMARS multiple rocket launchers.

In the next package


New details soon emerged. On February 1, Reuters, citing its sources, revealed the Pentagon's new plans. It follows from his message that GLSDB products were not included in the latest assistance package. At the same time, the decision on deliveries has been made, and such ammunition will be included in the next batch of aid. Officially, the new package will be announced during this week - until February 5 inclusive. The total value of the allocated products this time will exceed $2 billion.

Reuters sources indicate that the GLSDB missiles for this package will be made specifically for Ukraine. In the near future, the US presidential administration and the Department of Defense will place an order for the production of such weapons as part of the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative.


First start of GLSDB on trials, 2015

According to the latest news from Reuters, the US is ready to provide the Kyiv regime with GLSDB ammunition, but their supply is associated with certain difficulties. So, there are no finished products yet - the White House and the Pentagon have only made the necessary decisions and are only preparing to place an order for their production. The volume and cost of the future contract have not yet been disclosed. Also, the timing of its implementation and sending the first batches of weapons to the recipient is questionable.

In late November, it was reported that Boeing would be able to send the first GLSDBs to Ukraine during the spring. It is possible that such estimates were given taking into account the immediate receipt of the order and the start of production. Just over two months have passed since then, and the hypothetical start date for deliveries should have shifted to the right accordingly. It should be noted that certain difficulties are possible at the stage of launching production, which will also negatively affect the timing of the order.

rocket and bomb


The Ground-Launched Small Diameter Bomb guided munition is one of the latest US developments in the field of high-precision weapons. It has been developed by Boeing and Saab (Sweden) since the early 2015s. In XNUMX, the project was brought to field tests, and over the next few years, Boeing and Saab performed fine-tuning of the design and demonstrated the main functions of the product.

To date, the GLSDB ammunition has passed all the tests and is preparing for full-fledged mass production. The Pentagon is already planning to purchase such weapons for its needs. Now it has become known about the possible placement of an order - to assist Ukraine.


The GLSDB project is based on the curious idea of ​​combining two ready-made components to obtain fundamentally new combat capabilities. Such ammunition is actually a GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb with an attached solid propellant engine from an M26 rocket for the MLRS / HIMARS MLRS.

The use of only available components greatly simplifies and reduces the cost of production and operation. Thus, the cost of a serial product assembled from components from warehouses is set at $40. An operational-tactical missile of the ATACMS family with close range characteristics costs more than a million. However, an aerial bomb carries a much smaller warhead.

The bomb-based missile is fully compatible with existing US-style MLRS and is launched from a standard container. New variants of self-propelled launchers on different bases and with different features are also offered.

After starting with the help of a solid propellant rocket engine, the product enters a given trajectory, gains the required height and speed, after which the engine is reset. Further, a combat stage in the form of an aerial bomb GBU-39 flies to the target. Despite the unusual way of launching, the bomb retains all the basic functions and capabilities.

The characteristics and combat qualities of the GLSDB are mainly determined by the parameters of the GBU-39 bomb. This ammunition is 1,8 m long with an outer diameter of less than 200 mm. Weight - 129 kg, incl. warhead weighing up to 93 kg, depending on modification. The bomb has a streamlined body, and is also equipped with a folding wing and plumage, with the help of which it carries out a gliding flight along the required trajectory.


Various modifications of the GBU-39 bomb are equipped with an inertial / satellite guidance system, a semi-active laser or active radar homing head. The combat capabilities of the bomb depend on the type of guidance means. Thus, guidance based on navigation systems allows you to attack only stationary targets, while laser and radar seekers ensure the defeat of moving ones. At the same time, a modification with a laser head needs to illuminate the target.

During tests, the GLSDB product showed a flight range of more than 130 km - when launched into the front hemisphere of the launcher. It is also possible to attack a target behind the starting position. Part of the engine energy is spent on the maneuver, and the flight range is reduced to 70 km.

The question of opposition


The United States is only deciding whether to provide the Kyiv regime with GLSDB ammunition. If a positive decision is made and Boeing receives an order, deliveries of finished products will begin only in a few months. Missiles of a new type will appear in the combat zone no earlier than spring-summer. Of course, if Washington decides to supply them.

However, the Russian army is already ready for the adversary to have such weapons and will be able to effectively deal with them. The fact is that the GLSDB product, despite starting from the ground, is actually a conventional gliding guided bomb. This is a small-sized sub- or supersonic maneuvering aerodynamic target - in fact, a typical target for air defense systems.


Disguised launcher variant from GLSDB promotional material

Modern Russian anti-aircraft missile systems designed for military and facility air defense are capable of detecting, attacking and hitting a variety of air targets, including precision weapons such as guided bombs. Similar capabilities of the Tor, Pantsir complexes, etc. repeatedly worked out in exercises, and now they are being confirmed in the framework of real hostilities.

During the current Special Operation, our air defense has repeatedly demonstrated the defeat of various air targets, incl. difficult to intercept. Thus, a large number of MLRS / HIMARS guided missiles were successfully destroyed in the air. In addition, AGM-88 anti-radar missiles are regularly intercepted. All this means that the GBU-39 bombs as part of the GLSDB system are not fundamentally difficult and can be detected and destroyed.

For promotional purposes


According to US media reports, the Pentagon and the White House have been debating for several months whether to transfer the new GLSDB precision-guided missiles to the Kyiv regime. According to the latest news, a positive decision has been made and will be announced in the coming days. Nevertheless, it cannot be ruled out that such weapons will again not be included in the new aid package, and their delivery will again be postponed indefinitely.

In the context of the delivery of GLSDB, the American leadership will have to solve a specific problem. It is directly interested in supporting Kyiv and maintaining the combat capability of its formations. To do this, they allow the transfer of various weapons and equipment, incl. modern and promising. At the same time, the GLSDB missile is one of the latest American developments, and this product is planned to be promoted on the international arms market.

The fighting in Ukraine is seen as an opportunity to test modern weapons in real conditions, as well as show them to potential buyers. However, Russian air defense is capable of spoiling such an advertising campaign and depriving the United States of orders for a new product. Whether Washington will choose to support an ally or profit from its industry will become clear in the near future.
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    3 February 2023 05: 21
    However, the Russian army is already ready for the adversary to have such weapons and will be able to effectively deal with them.
    No problems? I doubt that this is the case, most likely it will require even greater saturation of the RF Armed Forces with air defense systems. Yes, and the cost of a rocket of $ 40 against Hymers is quite dangerous, especially since the components will be taken from warehouses .... They will throw it and the air defense will not cope. You need to create something new. Cheap and massive... request
    1. +6
      3 February 2023 05: 44
      You need to create something new. Cheap and massive...

      This is new - long forgotten old. And it is called - BAY FIRST. I get the impression that our military-industrial elite is resting on its laurels and drinking tea with jam - after all, everything is fine with us, hats were brought a hundred years in advance. And when the enemy has a new type of weapon, then another analogue immediately slips on his knee and begins to be tested under the swelling of the cheeks. And it is necessary, as in Stalin's times - they quickly assembled a sharashka and gave a week to the deadline for the SAME weapon to appear. And the state task for production is to do this, only more. For failure to meet deadlines and tasks - to the front line. Well, do not shoot, in fact, we are already poisoned by the bacillus of humanism, so let them feel for themselves what they doomed the soldiers to with their inaction. War should be treated like war, not like a picnic with pyrotechnics. And some of us stubbornly do not understand this.
      1. -5
        3 February 2023 06: 04
        "But it is necessary, as in Stalin's times - they quickly assembled a sharashka and gave a week to the deadline for the SAME weapon to appear."
        This is where the dog is buried for us: Attempts to create the same weapons all the time led the USSR, firstly, to a technical lag, and secondly, to the depletion of the economy.
        1. +6
          3 February 2023 09: 36
          Where can you get motivated engineers to solve the issue of air defense during massive missile strikes with high-precision missiles?
          1. +9
            3 February 2023 11: 30
            If in our country the leaders, instead of cutting, fraud and sabotage, were engaged in business, then we could create the same guided bombs and such missiles for the Smerch MLRS and UAVs of various types and in large numbers.
            And you can tell Surovikin and Shoigu about how easy it is to cover air defense from strikes with these ammunition, otherwise they made a "difficult decision" due to the fact that the bridges across the Dnieper were gouged with the same ammunition and left half of the Russian region including the regional center Kherson. What other Russian territories will be left by our "brilliant" spearmen after the appearance of such ammunition in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, we will see, in any case, their massive use at such ranges will create a great threat to our troops and lead to great casualties.
            1. 0
              4 February 2023 14: 48
              Quote: ramzay21
              If in our country the leaders, instead of cutting, fraud and sabotage, were engaged in business, then we could create the same guided bombs and such missiles for the Smerch MLRS and UAVs of various types and in large numbers.

              Many, on the contrary, stubbornly argue that we do not need high-precision missiles for MLRS because it is too expensive and not practical, it is much easier to throw cheap ones and do not care that they will not hit. As an analogue of the chimera, there was already Kama, so what? soldier
          2. 0
            3 February 2023 14: 27
            there are options,
            loading into 16 TPK SAM Tor-M2 - 64 missiles from subsonic targets
            and the new ZRPK Pantsir-SM, more precisely, its TZM without machine guns with 24 missiles
      2. +11
        3 February 2023 10: 49
        Well, why should the military-industrial complex work better than all other industries? "Effective" managers were placed in all departments, "worked" and continue to "work". Our President ASKES the Minister of Industry and Trade Manturov to work.
    2. -5
      3 February 2023 06: 04
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      You need to create something new. Cheap and massive...

      It already exists, it is called "Shell". Rapid-fire guns for such targets are just that. And also, in principle, you can take even very ancient "Shilkas", "teach" them to work with a modern radar (it can be mounted on a separate chassis and linked via Wi-Fi). Four quick-firing 23mm barrels will tear everyone to shreds on approach, and inexpensively.
      1. +6
        3 February 2023 13: 42
        And how much will the Shell hold back in one raid? 12th? What if there are 30 bombs in a raid? Where is the second Shell? But no ... Here is the fender and the Shell and the object. ....... you can teach Shilka to work.... But "no one" takes these Shilka .. And does not force them to work .... . And the "hats" are no longer enough. And our men will die because of the partners in management and the Moscow Region.
      2. +5
        3 February 2023 14: 54
        No, the target is high-altitude, then it falls at an angle close to vertical. Guns will not work on it at all ... Here Thor is good because he has practically no "blind" funnel.
        1. 0
          4 February 2023 02: 29
          Quote: Georgy Sviridov_2
          No, the target is high-altitude, then it falls at an angle close to vertical. Guns will not work on it at all ... Here Thor is good because he has practically no "blind" funnel.

          That's just the point, dear George, that Tor has a dead zone. Not at the rocket, but at the radar. And it's basically right on top of the car. The name Thor, according to the creator, the complex got its name because of the radar field of view and it resembles a Toroid, i.e. something in the form of donuts. And the toroid has a rather large dead zone just on top of the complex. The solution is not only in the Tor air defense system or the Pantsir air defense missile system. The solution is rather in the missiles themselves. We need missiles with active homing. Those. missiles that do not need illumination or guidance from the radar. Only in this case and also the supply of the Shell with small-sized self-guided missiles, i.e. bringing the ammunition load to 48 missiles (small-sized missiles fit 4 in a standard container), one complex will be able to shoot down the ENTIRE package of GLSDB missiles launched with even a chimera, where there are 6 missiles, even with MLRS, where there are 12 missiles and there will still be enough missiles to destroy the next volleys. But MANDATORY need SAM with active homing. Otherwise, the Shell can shoot down no more than 4 targets at the same time. And while redirecting to the next, they can get it or destroy the defended target.
    3. +1
      3 February 2023 10: 01
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Yes, and the cost of the rocket is $ 40 against Hymers,

      Tse impudent nonsense about 40 thousand dollars.
      One planning bomb, which they want to slam onto a rocket, costs, depending on the modification, from 100 to more than 200 thousand dollars.
      So 40 thousand dollars is most likely only the cost of the rocket and the necessary work to modernize it for new use.
      1. 0
        3 February 2023 13: 01
        from 100 to more than 200
        The estimated cost of GLSDB is the sum of
        - the cost of the GBU-39 aerial bomb, while using the surplus SDB bombs left after the end of the war in Afghanistan,
        - a rocket engine from decommissioned and decommissioned M26 rockets,
        - necessary assembly work.
        Total: any price of at least 100 at least 200 for the work, depending on with whom and how to share, and separately plus for the disposal of both expired components, the resulting product is handed over to the natives, such is the business.
      2. 0
        4 February 2023 06: 51
        Yes, 40000 is the cost of only the GBU-39, without the rocket engine and production work ...
  2. -9
    3 February 2023 06: 10
    The US can only be weaned from sticking its nose everywhere by creating a constant threat to their territory. Latin American allies are, of course, good, but coups are easier to arrange there than in Ukraine. In this regard, the question arises: why is Alaska bad? The territory is still USAshkina (I wonder why), to Chukotka - 49 km. The garrison and air missile base should be close to Uelen! Moreover, the Americans are aiming at Wrangel Island. And the justification for such placement is excellent - the protection of navigation along the NSR. The main thing is that the number of troops should be sufficient for the occupation, if necessary, of Alaska.
    I previously expressed this idea, but there was an addition. Many countries are showing their readiness to provide us with military assistance. So, why not come to an agreement with North Korea on the construction of such a base by their workers? Their ability to work is amazing, and most importantly - they will earn well! The benefit is mutual.
    1. +6
      3 February 2023 09: 22
      Quote: Just_Kvasha
      The main thing is that the number of troops should be sufficient for the occupation, if necessary, of Alaska.

      Let me remind you that they sold it at one time due to supply problems.
      What are you going to feed the occupation corps - with a complete blockade of the coast and the superiority of their Navy?!
      Quote: Just_Kvasha
      So, why not come to an agreement with North Korea on the construction of such a base by their workers?
      - regular migrant workers?
      1. 0
        4 February 2023 02: 33
        Quote: your1970
        Quote: Just_Kvasha
        The main thing is that the number of troops should be sufficient for the occupation, if necessary, of Alaska.

        Let me remind you that they sold it at one time due to supply problems.
        What are you going to feed the occupation corps - with a complete blockade of the coast and the superiority of their Navy?!
        Quote: Just_Kvasha
        So, why not come to an agreement with North Korea on the construction of such a base by their workers?
        - regular migrant workers?

        They sold Alaska not because of supply problems, but because of the fear that the British would capture it and the Russian Empire could not help. And then RI did not receive a PENNY from the sale. Those. gave away Alaska for FREE.
        1. -1
          4 February 2023 11: 50
          Quote: nedgen
          They sold Alaska not because of supply problems, but because of the fear that the British would seize it and the Russian Empire could not help.

          They sold it not out of some fear, but precisely because of the impossibility of regular supply and support.
          And yes, it’s impossible to say for sure whether RI received money or not. There is a theory that an insurance premium was paid in an amount equal to the transaction
          .
    2. -7
      3 February 2023 10: 17
      Everything is easier. Open up the opportunity for Colombians to deliver drugs with a couple of our diesels. Fill up their filthy country with drugs. It will fall apart on its own.
  3. +3
    3 February 2023 06: 20
    1. This looks like a test of a promising sample in real conditions. That is, it is rather a concern for the American military-industrial complex than for the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
    2. The idea itself is very sound and promising.
    3. The confrontation between Russia and the United States is reaching a new level. However, we see not a shipment from warehouses, but a sale of intentions, funds are allocated for the creation of production, as it becomes clear from the article.

    As a result, the United States is waging a proxy war against Russia, trying to maximize its advantage in the creation and rapid deployment of new weapons systems.
    As long as the US feels its scientific and technological advantage, it will look for ways to ignite another proxy conflict on our borders.
    To guarantee our security, we need to close our technological gap.
    1. -10
      3 February 2023 07: 09
      Where are we technologically behind them? In my opinion, we are lagging behind only organizationally and financially. By the way, read the post of the Leader Barmaleev. It is this approach that leads to a technological lag.
  4. +5
    3 February 2023 06: 59
    The decision was made and in the spring these missiles will already be equipped with the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Coupled with the massive use of strike UAVs of various classes, tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, as well as the tactics of "unmanned air blocking of the combat area." All this can create serious problems for our army if we are not ready for this.
    1. -4
      3 February 2023 07: 07
      Interestingly, are we really not able to implement the tactics of "unmanned air blocking" of cargo transportation in 404? How many lives will we save!
  5. +3
    3 February 2023 07: 04
    "What will Washington choose - the support of an ally or the profit of its industry - will become clear in the near future"
    Clever article, until such an ending! Churchill's popular phrase, which, by the way, many people love, ours is no exception There are no friends in big politics, there are priorities of the state and the people, and the person who represents the country must think about its interests. This was stated by the president in an interview with the program "Moscow. Kremlin. Putin" on the TV channel "Russia 1" (VGTRK).[i] [/ i]
    And the main thing is not what the West and the Americans are doing, but the fact that we are sitting and waiting, with our "red lines"!
  6. -6
    3 February 2023 07: 11
    Only help with weapons, training, etc. progressive forces for the independence of Texas and Philadelphia, the restoration of the historical sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Hawaii, Alaska and California will stop the followers of Hitler in the United States. An additional factor will be the impact on maritime shipping routes.
    1. +3
      3 February 2023 08: 56
      Quote: dfk-80
      Only help with weapons, training, etc. Progressive Forces for the Independence of Texas and Philadelphia

      Academician Ramzan Akhmatovich Kadyrov telegraphs NATO countries on issues of territorial integrity.
      Where were you when we fought for Ichkeria, when we defended the interest of independence, why European states, including Ukraine, did not support us

      https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5796395

      Separately, I note that progressive forces in Texas, and especially in Philadelphia, are cutting cucumbers for themselves. And those regressive forces that love weapons - firstly, they already have weapons depots, and secondly, they don’t like people like you either.
      Quote: dfk-80
      restoration of the historical sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Hawaii,

      It's like the Japanese, or what, in December 41st? Well, go ahead.
  7. -5
    3 February 2023 08: 29
    . However, Russian air defense is capable of spoiling such an advertising campaign and depriving the United States of orders for a new product.

    Yes, this is a pure dilemma for the Americans, and also the Swedes (saab is one of the developers). On the one hand, I want to test the product in real combat conditions against a modern army with the best air defense and electronic warfare systems (no field tests will give such a result) On the other hand (the example of Bayraktar), you can put a fat cross on many years and expensive development. Let them think...
    1. +8
      3 February 2023 09: 01
      Quote: South Ukrainian
      Yes, this is a pure dilemma for the Americans, and also the Swedes (saab is one of the developers).

      Quote: South Ukrainian
      On the other hand (an example of Bayraktar), you can put a bold cross on a long-term and expensive development.

      There is no dilemma here. Bayraktar in Azerbaijan and Ukraine is hyped so that all sorts of IAIs (with much more advanced products) bite their elbows. The queue of customers for 5 years ahead. It suddenly turned out that shock drones, which were toys for very serious guys - in fact, only the United States and Israel - are available to such, frankly, international homeless people as Azerbaijan and Ukraine.

      And specifically with this product, Boeing and SAAB have been worn for ten years - no one needed it, everyone who has highmars throws bombs from airplanes. So the Ukrainian case is a godsend for them: there are highmarses, but no planes. Not yet.
      1. +2
        3 February 2023 09: 58
        Quote: Negro
        who has highmars, bombs are thrown from airplanes

        They also have ATACMS, with a longer range.
      2. -1
        3 February 2023 22: 33
        Quote: Negro
        It suddenly turned out that shock drones, which were toys for very serious guys - in fact, only the United States and Israel - are available to such, frankly, international homeless people as Azerbaijan and Ukraine.


        It's not really clear why this hasn't happened before. Such cool guys like the French, who can go into space, and into the nucleus, and into fighters +++, out of the blue crap on UAVs. And there are few of them, and those that are, for the most part imported. The Germans and the British are there. Mysterious.
        1. -1
          3 February 2023 23: 15
          Funny) Did they participate in some kind of race?)) Are these countries aware of this?))
    2. +8
      3 February 2023 10: 17
      Quote: South Ukrainian
      On the one hand, I want to test the product in real combat conditions against a modern army with the best air defense and electronic warfare

      These bombs have been bombing Syria for years. The efficiency is extremely high. Only tests against the modern army will not work, our troops are stuck at the level of the 70-80s of the last century.
      Quote: South Ukrainian
      (an example of Bayraktar), you can put a bold cross,

      After this war, the number of produced TB2s was increased from 20 to 30 units per month, the number of customers increased to 40+ countries.
    3. +7
      3 February 2023 12: 38
      On the other hand (an example of Bayraktar), you can put a bold cross on a long-term and expensive development


      What? They now have the main problem, to master 100500 money and somehow close orders. They have been making 30 TV2 a month since the winter and should speed up even more. Just two weeks ago, another contract - 370 million for Kuwait in the version with a Turkish optical station.



      They became the 28th country. which signed a firm contract for TV2 (we are talking about TV2 and only firm contracts, but no intentions, Akinchi / Kizilma 40+ countries).

      On the contrary, now just US corporations are lobbying for all sorts of Reapers and Mojave for $1. For the good of it, to sit when others make sales for years to come. If we are talking about UAVs. And a bad result (this is about Switches) is also a result.
  8. +6
    3 February 2023 09: 31
    . Thus, a large number of MLRS / HIMARS guided missiles were successfully destroyed in the air.

    Antonovsky bridge sends greetings to Ryabov hi (stationary target dozens of hits despite good air defense)
    A range of 150 km means that our logistics (warehouses, etc.) will become even more complicated, since the range will almost double compared to GMLRS. I think everyone remembers how warehouses were torn from khimar earlier before they were not transferred, history may repeat itself. Plus this still a penetrating bomb. Hello to headquarters in dugouts, even fortified ones. This is a big problem!
    1. +7
      3 February 2023 10: 02
      A situation is being created that it is impossible to defend the remnants of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions. The Dzhankoy airfield is under attack, the entire LDNR and the “land corridor”, the Perekop Isthmus are in the affected area. The supply arm is too large, attack helicopters will not be able to work effectively due to the range (~ 250 km), there are too few attack aircraft and bombers. The goodwill gesture will be in the summer.
      I
      1. -5
        3 February 2023 12: 10
        yes, yes, in the summer we retreat to Moscow ..............................
      2. 0
        5 February 2023 00: 38
        The Germans have tactical missiles for Himars with a range of 600 km.
        It seems like they gave the Ukrainians or promise to give.
        Do you know about them?
  9. -2
    3 February 2023 10: 07
    In general, the idea for an expeditionary force without air support is a great one. For the control center, there will be enough light drones and aircraft of the control center and satellites. And PU type Kamaz. I think that the floor scheme later (rethought by China, the Turks, Iran) will still shake the colonial troops of Western countries anywhere in Asia-Africa. But the Russian Federation definitely needs to make a similar bomb with wings and a similar tandem.
    1. +2
      3 February 2023 10: 22
      This scheme is a new reform of the USMC. Expeditionary forces saturated with missiles and UAVs.
      1. +1
        3 February 2023 10: 44
        And the most interesting thing is that the technology transferred to the allies in the form of Hymars (in any version) will not be able to fully work without the US control center. And their intelligence quickly covers the whole world. For good, the 404s themselves would not have been able to shoot so effectively .... and the transmission of the control center is not fired and cannot be attracted for this ....
  10. -6
    3 February 2023 11: 27
    1. Range and gliding means a long flight time to the target at low speed and medium altitude, and old ammunition is not invisible. So there will always be plenty of time to counteract. This is an ideal target not only for air defense, but for all other methods of countering its guidance or homing systems.
    2. 40 thousand dollars can only beat with the simplest guidance system and only when using old ammunition from warehouses. If you need to produce new ammunition, they will be an order of magnitude more expensive.
    3. The 90 kg warhead is incapable of hitting well protected or moving targets except for direct hits and homing.
    In general, much worse than Tochka-U or the Belarusian Polonaise.
    1. +8
      3 February 2023 12: 47
      1) You must have air defense on the route (which is selected just from the intelligence report on air defense positions around them) and at the final object.
      1a) Air defense must be active. Then just yesterday there was a video of how the UAV lit up the Arctic Thor and pointed Excaliburs at it. By reference, this is the Kherson region.


      He was not abandoned, his radar was raised, and after the first arrival, the crew jumped out (for the second arrival sad ).



      Total, according to your calculation, this is impossible, but in practice, it happened.
  11. -8
    3 February 2023 11: 47
    The most cardinal and effective response to such supplies is the destruction of navigation and target designation systems for this high-precision weapon in the face of the NATO satellite constellation. Well, if, due to their wretchedness, they have not made killer satellites in Russia until now, then you need to use the old Soviet weapons. Even in the USSR, special nuclear charges were developed, the main factors of destruction of which were the neutron flux and the electromagnetic pulse. And for delivery into orbit, you can use rockets for "Satan-1", which are removed from combat duty in order to be replaced by "Sarmat". And there is no big trouble if Russia's satellite constellation is destroyed in the same way. At present, it is beneficial for Russia that space be cleaned to zero.
  12. +1
    3 February 2023 16: 08
    However, the Russian army is already ready for the adversary to have such weapons and will be able to effectively deal with them. The fact is that the GLSDB product, despite starting from the ground, is actually a conventional gliding guided bomb. This is a small-sized sub- or supersonic maneuvering aerodynamic target - in fact, a typical target for air defense systems.

    I would not be so optimistic, because this product is not a "typical target" - these are two objects with different aerodynamic characteristics. Until the moment of separation according to the target, this is a missile ball, after that it is a gliding ammunition. When and at what point the separation (and the next change in the characteristics of the object) will occur, the air defense-missile defense forces do not know, and moreover, the object is divided into 2 parts, which will also make interception difficult to a certain extent.
    All this indicates that this target will be a rather unpleasant object for interception, probably in some cases requiring additional launches for destruction. Speaking of additional launches - how will they shoot down such corn? And what is the price of these products. Because if it is less or comparable, then there is one alignment, if more, then another. 40k bucks is 2.8k "wooden", no joke ..

    The range of this weapon indicates that it will have to be intercepted (as a score.target) in a relatively close zone - that is, probably with missiles. In the near (after separation) - it will probably have to be cannon weapons. Do we have enough saturation with similar systems of the near zone of units and objects at the front? Considering that, in fact, this product is "deshman" and after a decision is made to launch the production, what is called "packs" will soon be delivered.
  13. 0
    3 February 2023 18: 34
    At the same time, the GLSDB missile is one of the latest American developments, and this product is planned to be promoted on the international arms market.
    The fighting in Ukraine is seen as an opportunity to test modern weapons in real conditions, as well as show them to potential buyers. However, Russian air defense is capable of spoiling such an advertising campaign and depriving the United States of orders for a new product.
    And in the next topic, a note that junk is supplied to Ukraine for recycling, but what a dissonance. As for the spoiled advertising campaign, one can only notice that this process is sometimes mutual or even the opposite of what is expected, alas ...
  14. Uno
    0
    3 February 2023 20: 36
    A new package has already been announced, it contains some "precision missiles", so it is quite possible that they are
    1. 0
      4 February 2023 15: 02
      Yes, everything has already been passed, reasoning is useless
  15. 0
    3 February 2023 21: 37
    40 thousand dollars - at this price, you can just throw the enemy, fall asleep. No air defense will cope if they shoot en masse. And at this price, they will shoot en masse. Dangerous weapon. High-precision, long-range and for almost free ...
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. 0
    4 February 2023 21: 54
    I am concerned about the toothlessness of the current foreign policy. They give us a slap in the face, after a slap in the face, but we are silent????? Why not put in the form of a response, the same Syria missiles with a range of more than 60 km, to destroy American military bases? Is not a full-fledged trump card? Who knew there that the Americans created a 40 km security zone around their bases, where neither the Syrians nor we go.
    If such a dance has begun, what is stopping us ??? There are Kurds in Iraq, give them some rockets (threaten you will)