Self-propelled artillery mount AMX AuF1 (France)

33
Self-propelled artillery mount AMX AuF1 (France)
AMX AuF1 of one of the French units in a joint exercise. Photo by the US Department of Defense


In the eighties, the latest self-propelled artillery unit AMX AuF1 entered service with the French ground forces. Equipment of this type was built in large enough quantities, which allowed it to become the basis of French ground artillery for many years. To date, this role has passed to newer combat vehicles, but the old self-propelled guns remain in service, and so far they have not been abandoned.



New generation


The decision to develop a new self-propelled gun with a 155-mm gun was made in the late sixties. With the help of such a machine, in the foreseeable future, they were going to replace the aging F3 self-propelled guns. The latter were equipped with an old 155-mm howitzer and could only fire at 18-20 km, which was already considered insufficient. In addition, they used the outdated tank chassis AMX-13.

In 1969-70. the army, together with leading industrial enterprises, worked out the appearance of a new generation of self-propelled guns and determined the requirements for it. In addition to a general increase in performance compared to the existing model, mobility was required at the level of existing tanks, a high rate of fire with any ammunition, the ability to fire in any direction without restrictions, as well as protection of the crew from bullets / shrapnel and weapons mass destruction.

According to one of the requirements, the project received the working designation GCT (Grande Cadence de Tir - "High rate of fire"). Later, when adopted, they introduced the name Automoteur modèle F1 (“Self-propelled gun, model F1”) or AuF1. The AMX AuF1 or AMX-30 AuF1 index has also become widespread, indicating the type of chassis chosen.


Armored vehicles of Saudi Arabia, 1992. Photo by the US Department of Defense

Initially, the project was created by Arsenal Bourget (EFAB) and Arsenal Roan (ARE), and in 1971 it was transferred to the newly created concern GIAT. The development of self-propelled guns and the construction of experimental equipment took just a couple of years. The first prototype of the GCT entered the range tests already in 1972. Test firing began the following year. Over the next few years, development and refinement of the design continued.

At this stage, eight experienced self-propelled guns were built with certain differences. Despite a number of major innovations, new features, etc., the prototypes showed high technical and combat characteristics, and also demonstrated sufficient reliability. In the middle of the decade, experimental machines went to the army to master and work out application issues.

Way to the troops


In 1976, the army and GIAT planned to sign the first contract for the serial production of new self-propelled guns. However, the military faced a lack of funding and the order had to be put on hold indefinitely. The manufacturing concern, in turn, began looking for a new buyer. Already in 1977, he received the first real order - Saudi Arabia wished to purchase 63 combat vehicles.

The first French order appeared only in the early eighties, and the finished equipment was delivered to the troops in 1983. Later, the army was able to order a fairly large number of self-propelled guns. So, up to and including 1988, 179 vehicles were purchased in the original configuration, and then the production of upgraded AuF1Ts began. Until 1992, 74 self-propelled guns were assembled according to the updated project. In addition, in the mid-nineties, France rebuilt 20 obsolete tanks into self-propelled guns.


Repair of self-propelled gun: the tower was removed from the chassis. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

In the early eighties, a second export contract was also obtained. This time, the equipment was bought by Iran, which at that time was at war with Iran. In 1983-85. sent him ok. 85 combat vehicles. At the turn of the eighties and nineties, Kuwait ordered 18 self-propelled guns. He received the finished equipment shortly after the end of the Gulf War and the liberation of the country.

In the nineties, GIAT tried to sell the AuF1 to India. Especially for her, prototypes of self-propelled guns of an unusual appearance were built and tested. They were made on the chassis of the T-72 and Arjun tanks using a standard French turret. Despite their best efforts, the Indian Army was not interested in such a proposal.

The production of AMX AuF1 self-propelled guns lasted about 15 years and during this time more than 400 units were produced. such a technique. The main customer - although not the starting one - was predictably France.

Self-propelled guns in service


The first serial AuF1 went to Saudi Arabia, where they are still in operation. Their service in the Arabian army is unremarkable. Equipment regularly participates in maneuvers, and also undergoes repairs. There is no reliable information about the combat use. At the same time, to date, the ACS fleet has been reduced to 60 units. The situation is similar with the Kuwaiti AuF1, but this country has retained all received self-propelled guns.


The stern hatches of the turret are open, the stowage of ammunition is visible. Photo Chars-francais.net

Iraq at one time ordered French self-propelled guns to make up for losses on the Iranian front. As far as is known, the received AuF1s were used in battles, received damage and suffered losses. However, a significant part of the self-propelled guns remained in service, incl. after repair. However, as far as is known, by 2003 even the remaining vehicles were out of order, and they were not used in the new war.

France actively used its self-propelled guns in training events. In addition, since the early nineties, AuF1 units have participated in military operations several times. Self-propelled guns were used in a peacekeeping mission in the Balkans and demonstrated their advantages over obsolete artillery. They were also deployed to other areas as part of certain operations, and this practice continues to this day.

As service continued, French AMX AuF1s were upgraded several times. The next major update was planned in the middle of the 1s, but it was abandoned. During this period, the new CAESAR self-propelled guns entered service with the French army, and the modernization of the AuFXNUMX was considered inappropriate. In addition, a plan was drawn up for the gradual replacement of old self-propelled guns with new ones.

By now, most of the AuF1s have left combat units and have given way to the new CAESARs. Some of the old cars were disposed of, the rest were sent for storage or to museums. Only 32 self-propelled guns remain in service. They plan to keep them until 2030, after which they will also be replaced with new wheelbase guns.


ACS AuF1 from the IFOR in Bosnia, 1995. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

Design features


The AMX AuF1 is a self-propelled artillery gun on a tracked chassis with a 155 mm gun in a full-rotation turret. Some of the units were taken from existing combat vehicles, while others were developed from scratch. As a result, it was possible to fulfill all the requirements of the customer and provide the necessary performance characteristics.

All production versions of the self-propelled guns were built on the chassis of the AMX-30 tank. The latter retained a standard armored hull with 80 mm thick forehead armor, a power plant based on a 680 hp diesel engine. and chassis with torsion bar suspension. The layout as a whole did not change - the tower was mounted on a regular shoulder strap. At the same time, the chassis was modernized several times. Engines and transmissions were replaced, an auxiliary power unit was mounted, various systems were finalized, etc.

For AuF1, an original large-sized turret and a characteristic box shape was developed. Under the protection of 20-mm armor, a swinging gun mount, an automatic loader, controls and three jobs for the commander, gunner and loader were placed.


Decommissioned self-propelled gun used by the peacekeeping forces, in the Museum of Saumur. Photo Tanks-encyclopedia.com

The self-propelled guns received a 155 mm GCT type rifled gun with a 39 klb barrel. The barrel was equipped with a two-chamber muzzle brake and a semi-automatic shutter. The gun was placed on advanced hydropneumatic recoil devices. Remotely controlled hydraulic actuators provided horizontal guidance by turning the turret and vertical guidance from +5° to +66°.

The gun uses separate loading shots with a modular propellant charge in a burning cap. In the aft part of the turret, stacks of an automatic loader for 42 shots were placed - 42 shells and 180 charge modules were placed in the cells, 6 for each shot. With the help of two conveyors and pushers, ammunition is automatically loaded into the barrel. Replenishment of ammunition is carried out through hatches in the aft wall of the tower.

The fire control system is distinguished by a certain simplicity. An optical sight for direct fire is provided. There is also a panoramic sight, an electro-optical goniometer, a navigation system and other devices for firing from closed positions. The gunner's console is equipped with aiming and firing controls. Reception of data for firing was carried out using a standard radio station. In recent upgrades, automated systems for the exchange of information and calculation of data for firing have been introduced.

ACS AuF1 can use a wide range of 155-mm projectiles. The main ones are high-explosive fragmentation ammunition of various types. The standard ammunition also included several smoke. When using a "normal" NATO-standard projectile, the firing range reaches 18 km. The use of the French OE 155 56/69 with improved aerodynamics allows you to shoot at 23,5 km. Also used is the OE F2 / LU111 product with a bottom generator that increases the range to 30 km.

Auxiliary weapons include a machine gun on the turret, normal caliber or large caliber. Spare machine gun belts are stored inside the turret. Smoke grenade launchers are located on the forehead of the tower.


Experienced self-propelled guns on the T-72 chassis. Photo Arms-expo.ru

The length of the AuF1 with the gun forward exceeds 10,2 m, the width is 3,15 m, the height is 3,25 m. The weight, depending on the modification, exceeds 42 tons. km / h, and is also able to move off-road and overcome obstacles. Power reserve - at least 30 km.

Several modifications of the ACS were developed. After the appearance of new versions, the basic sample received the designation AuF1 H. Accordingly, the first upgraded version was called AuF1 T. It differed from the basic version of the “T” with more advanced navigation tools that simplified binding to positions. A small series was built ACS AuF1 TM with the communication and control system ATLAS. The "TA" variant combined the turret of the "TM" version with an upgraded AMX-30B2 chassis. The last was the AuF2 project, which provided for the installation of a 155-mm gun with a barrel length of 52 klb. In the future, such weapons received self-propelled guns CAESAR.

Past and Future


At the time of its introduction, the AMX AuF1 ACS was one of the best examples of its class in the world. Due to the use of a number of important decisions, she showed high performance characteristics and could effectively solve all the proposed tasks. Despite delays and problems, the French army received such equipment, and with it the well-known advantages.

However, this was almost 40 years ago, and over the past years, AuF1 has become obsolete. Various upgrades, including the latest AuF2 project from the late nineties, generally did not solve this problem. As a result, the command decided to reduce the fleet of old tracked vehicles and switch to new wheeled CAESARs. However, AuF1 was not completely abandoned. Several dozen of these machines continue to serve and will remain in service for the foreseeable future.

Video: https://t.me/topwar_official/67934
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    17 December 2022 07: 10
    Mdaaa ....! It turns out that artillery systems with a firing range comparable to the firing range of Akatsiya and Msta in NATO have been declared obsolete! But not in Russia...
    1. +1
      17 December 2022 10: 41
      Of course. Therefore, several dozen modern missile systems and a couple of hundred modern artillery systems radically changed the course of warfare. This is only possible with qualitative technological superiority,
      1. +1
        17 December 2022 16: 58
        Quote from cold wind
        Therefore, several dozen modern missile systems and a couple of hundred modern artillery systems radically changed the course of warfare.

        What nonsense about "at the root", a significant influence on the course is superiority in reconnaissance, the speed of bringing the coordinates of targets and the accuracy of ammunition on the one hand, and the stupidity of clerks with stripes in the matter of concentration and camouflage on the other. Actually artillery here is the second thing.
      2. 0
        18 December 2022 13: 28
        They changed the course of propaganda actions laughing Have even won laughing
    2. -1
      17 December 2022 12: 06
      Nikolaevich, good health. Now I looked: "Acacia" in terms of performance characteristics is close, but inferior to AuF. And even more so "Caesar".
      We traditionally have self-propelled guns "sadness": we are in the role of catching up ..
      About the fact that "Acacia" is a little outdated, there has been talk since the 80s. She was a little "shamanized" and that's it.
      At the same time, if we compare the possible theater of operations, the caterpillar chassis is preferably wheeled.
      From acquaintances of acquaintances, I heard that since 1984-1985 we have a lag in artillery.
      1. 0
        27 January 2023 13: 50
        Quote: vladcub
        Nikolaevich, good health. Now I looked: "Acacia" in terms of performance characteristics is close, but inferior to AuF. And even more so "Caesar".
        We traditionally have self-propelled guns "sadness": we are in the role of catching up ..
        About the fact that "Acacia" is a little outdated, there has been talk since the 80s. She was a little "shamanized" and that's it.
        At the same time, if we compare the possible theater of operations, the caterpillar chassis is preferably wheeled.
        From acquaintances of acquaintances, I heard that since 1984-1985 we have a lag in artillery.

        Well, this gun is an analogue of the Acacia, only the 2S3M series (with a barrel length of 39 calibers, while the acacia with a barrel length of 27 calibers) of the late 80s did not go into the series thanks to the holy 90s, according to the liberals, what would Yeltsin and Gaidar. Msta and Geacint surpass him in all respects. So the work on the super duper coalition has been going on for almost 25 years. They wanted to get a wunder waffle super gun, but things are still there.
    3. +1
      17 December 2022 12: 09
      AMX AuF1 is a complete analogue of "Msta-S". Alas, she surpassed "Acacia" already at the time of her appearance.
      1. +2
        17 December 2022 12: 28
        Msta analogue with? This is one of the most modern installations. I saw work from a new panzer howitzer, so there, a white room, the commander is sitting pressing the buttons, the automation is charging and directing everything. I wonder what kind of "analogue" we have? Somehow I doubt that the coalition inside looks the same ...
        1. -1
          17 December 2022 12: 51
          Are you adequate?
          What does the "panzer-howitzer" and AMX AuF1 have to do with it? These are weapons of different generations.
          1. 0
            19 December 2022 11: 13
            Well, your own "adequate" is enough to call revenge with a "complete analogue" of the French self-propelled gun. And what is my inadequate then? I didn’t compare it with a buggy
            1. 0
              20 December 2022 14: 54
              I answered your question directly in the commentary - "Msta-S" and AMX AuF1 are guns of the same generation. "Msta-S" and PzH 2000 - different.
              "Msta-S", this "one of the most modern installations", in fact, was already outdated at the time of its adoption into service. And our designers, by the way, already at the turn of the 90s understood this very well, otherwise a number of interesting works would not have appeared, for example, on the topic "Iset".
              And today is 2022, and you, speaking about the modernity of Msta, are at the same time surprised at my question about your adequacy?
              I will not object to the harshness of my statement and I apologize for it. But in its essence, I remain completely “with my own people” for the time being.
              1. 0
                20 December 2022 16: 10
                The last modification of the revenge, judging by open sources, dates back to 2012, in fact the most modern of the mass-produced ones, but what kind of "modifications" are there is a completely different question
                1. 0
                  20 December 2022 20: 25
                  The last modification of the revenge, judging by open sources, dates back to 2012

                  2014-m.
                  The fact that it was made so late in the category of modern does not put it forward in any way. Sorry.
      2. 0
        27 January 2023 14: 08
        Quote: Bogalex
        AMX AuF1 is a complete analogue of "Msta-S". Alas, she surpassed "Acacia" already at the time of her appearance.

        They compared the tool that began to be produced in 1967 with the tool that began production in 1976, between them there is a gap of 10 years in length. HER coeval cannon howitzer 2s5 Hyacinth is with him and you need to compare them and the same age and calibers are similar and hyacinth was better than her in all respects.
    4. 0
      18 December 2022 13: 30
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      It turns out that artillery systems with a firing range comparable to the firing range of Akatsiya and Msta

      Acacia is considered obsolete in Russia, but like AuF, it has not been withdrawn from service. Yes, and Msta is being modernized for a reason, so don't!
      1. 0
        20 December 2022 14: 57
        Well, what was there that was modernized to bring Msta at least on the same level as K9, Krab, or, God forbid, PzH 2000?
        Did KUMZ also supply a liquid crystal monitor to the driver? smile
        1. 0
          20 December 2022 15: 49
          Quote: Bogalex
          Well, what was there that was modernized to bring Msta at least on the same level as K9, Krab, or, God forbid, PzH 2000?
          Did KUMZ also supply a liquid crystal monitor to the driver?

          At least one level with new cars? You are so modest ... And what about the modernization of AuF or M-109, huh?

          In December 2012, information appeared about the further modernization of the Msta-S self-propelled guns, which received the designation 2S19M2. Central Design Bureau "Titan" has developed a modernized 152-mm howitzer 2A64M2 with an increased rate of fire and fire efficiency, as well as better operational properties. The 2S19M2 self-propelled guns are equipped with a new automated control system and navigation system, the maximum rate of fire has also been increased to 10 rounds per minute and the “simultaneous fire attack” function has been implemented

          Maybe M-109 in a "simultaneous fire raid"?
          1. 0
            20 December 2022 20: 23
            And what about the modernization of AuF or M-109, huh?

            Or maybe you first answer the question posed to you?
            Maybe M-109 in a "simultaneous fire raid"?

            Do you want the bitter truth? smile "Simultaneous fire raid", as tests have shown, can be done on ANY gun using variable propellant charges, if there is a prepared calculation. But even this is not the main thing.
            The main thing is that the effectiveness of this fetish of our journalists hangs somewhere around zero and has nothing to do with real combat work.
            And yes, by the way. TsKB "Titan" has nothing to do with the development of 2S19M2. At all. This is about the level of your sources wink
            1. 0
              21 December 2022 04: 14
              Quote: Bogalex
              Or maybe you first answer the question posed to you?

              Once again, you demand to compare the OLD car with the NEW, even the newest. And why don’t you demand to compare it with the OTRK in terms of range? And let's compare Pion with Archer in terms of projectile mass.
              Your question is pure troll, but even it has an answer:
              Quote: Vladimir_2U
              The 2S19M2 self-propelled guns are equipped with a new automated control system and navigation system, the maximum rate of fire has also been increased to 10 rounds per minute and the "simultaneous fire raid" function has been implemented

              And besides the range of fire, because of the barrel, in general, the rest of the characteristics are practically at the level of NEW self-propelled guns.

              Quote: Bogalex
              "Simultaneous fire raid", as tests have shown, can be done on ANY gun using variable propellant charges, if there is a prepared calculation.
              Well, what are you pouring, huh? Even without taking into account the technical rate of fire, there remains a fire control system that can either quickly calculate the correction and change the aiming or not. And what about a prepared calculation, and according to pre-calculated data, up to a hundred rows of targeted targets, then this is a circus, in the manner of Indian dances wink , with a "raid" of a pair of shells.
              Quote: Bogalex
              The main thing is that the effectiveness of this fetish of our journalists hangs somewhere around zero and has nothing to do with real combat work.
              Your circus has such efficiency, and the NWO just showed the need and effectiveness of such a fire, it’s a pity not on our part.

              Quote: Bogalex
              And yes, by the way. TsKB "Titan" has nothing to do with the development of 2S19M2. At all. This is about the level of your sources
              That's strange, the developer of the system has nothing to do with its modernization. And who then? Share, because the self-propelled guns 2S19M2 that is.
              And what's with the M109, but, the question remains ...
        2. 0
          27 January 2023 14: 12
          Quote: Bogalex
          Well, what was there that was modernized to bring Msta at least on the same level as K9, Krab, or, God forbid, PzH 2000?
          Did KUMZ also supply a liquid crystal monitor to the driver? smile

          So you compare the guns of one development of the late 70s with a barrel length of 47 calibers, another development of the early 90s with a barrel length of 52 calibers between them, an abyss of 17 years Thank Yeltsin for our such a poor condition.
          It is necessary to compare with the Coalition, which is already being developed by almost 25 and cannot be brought to mind. In reality, the first batch came in 2015, 12 pieces. and as you can see, for 7 years they have not been able to start its mass production.
  2. 0
    17 December 2022 07: 15
    Everything is good in its time ... engineering does not stand still ... the French are going to modernize the "new" Caesars based on the results of their use in the expanses of Sumeria
  3. +2
    17 December 2022 08: 25
    equipment was bought by Iran, which at that time was at war with Iran.

    Description, please correct
  4. -7
    17 December 2022 08: 28
    Judging by the number and obsolescence of this system, it will soon be in Ukraine. I would not want to be a member of the crew of this vehicle, in the event of counter-battery firing, the crew has no chance, the design is controversial
    1. +1
      17 December 2022 12: 10
      I would not want to be a member of the crew of this vehicle, in the event of counter-battery firing, the crew has no chance, the design is controversial

      Why? Can you be a little more detailed?
      1. -2
        17 December 2022 12: 37
        The protective cover is thin, but with this arrangement of charges, the crew will receive barotrauma, in the best case
        1. +3
          17 December 2022 12: 56
          Name me at least one weapon, upon detonation of the ammunition of which the crew will not only not "get a barotrauma", but simply will not perish!
          The "protective casing" of the AMX AuF1 is no thinner than that of the 2C19, for your information. The calculation of the 2S19 when loading the transportable ammunition is also located outside.
    2. +3
      17 December 2022 12: 28
      Quote: APASUS
      Judging by the number and obsolescence of this system, it will soon be in Ukraine. I would not want to be a member of the crew of this vehicle, in the event of counter-battery firing, the crew has no chance, the design is controversial

      Just described Msta-S. Only now he is driven as "new, unparalleled in the world," and this Frenchman turns out to be an old golosh. Oh well
      1. -1
        17 December 2022 12: 47
        Quote from cold wind
        Well, well

        Side Jump Master! I instantly transferred it to Msta-S, while we are talking about a specific AMX AuF1 self-propelled gun
        1. -2
          17 December 2022 12: 49
          I'm saying that both self-propelled guns are outdated and should be in warehouses. They have no place in the active troops.
  5. +1
    17 December 2022 16: 21
    it seems to me or I'm wrong, but msta-s beats further French
    1. +1
      17 December 2022 17: 53
      Conventional projectile
      2С19 - 24,7 km
      AMX AuF1 - 23,5 km
      Active rocket projectile
      2С19 - 29,2 km
      AMX AuF1 - 30,0 km
      According to the set of parameters, these are equivalent systems.
  6. 0
    17 December 2022 17: 56
    It looks, if humanly, scary.
    And the angle of inclination of the tower in front is 70-75 degrees, is this so that everything that arrives crashes against the armor and the tanks of the Franks are fast?
  7. +1
    18 December 2022 13: 23
    ###vertical from +5° to +66°

    Obvious typo. It is impossible not to have at least a small negative. guidance angle. The same vetch speak -4° to +66°