The first MRC Typhon missile system was handed over to the US Army

34
The first MRC Typhon missile system was handed over to the US Army
Handover ceremony for the first MRC battery. In the background - a launcher in a combat position without a TPK


The development of promising missile weapons for the ground forces continues in the United States, and the Pentagon once again boasts of its success in this direction. A few days ago, the army received the first experienced multi-purpose missile system MRC Typhon. The battery pack will be handed over to one of the units, which will have to master new tools and prepare for experimental firing. The first launches are scheduled for next year.



First set


The official announcement of the delivery and acceptance of the first experimental complex MRC (Mid-Range Capability) was received on December 3. The transfer of equipment took place in a solemn atmosphere at one of the bases of the ground forces. During the event, command representatives spoke about the great importance of this delivery, and also noted the speed of project development. Work on the creation of the MRC began in July 2020, and in less than two and a half years, the army receives finished products.

The first MRC battery includes a command post and four launchers on semi-trailers, a set of tractors, as well as transport and support vehicles for various purposes. The army has not yet received ammunition for the experimental complex - their delivery is expected only in the foreseeable future.

The US Army has revealed a plan for further work. New equipment is transferred to one of the units of the missile forces; without specifying which one. In the coming weeks, after the end of the Christmas holidays, the training of personnel and the development of the facilities of the complex will begin. Then, on the basis of the combat unit, preliminary tests will be held.


Composition and features of the MRC complex

Next year, the army will receive the necessary missiles and perform the first test launches. Based on the results of test firing, the MRC complex should receive a recommendation for adoption and put on combat duty. Initial operational readiness of the first battery should be achieved before the end of FY2023. no later than October of the calendar year.

Plans for the distant future have not yet been specified. Nevertheless, it is clear that now MRC products will go into mass production, and the process of re-equipping some units and formations will begin. In parallel, the army will receive other land-based missile systems with other capabilities.

It is reported that the MRC complex will help the ground forces restore some of the combat capabilities that have been absent for several decades. Thus, land-based medium-range missiles will again be put into service. The army already had such systems, but in the late eighties they were abandoned under the terms of the Soviet-American treaty. Not so long ago, the treaty was terminated, and the Pentagon began to create new weapons that were previously banned.

Complex means


The study of the possibility of creating a promising land-based missile system, compatible with various ammunition and having broad combat capabilities, began at the end of the last decade. Then Lockheed Martin received an order to develop a full-fledged project of this kind. The work started in 2020 and was carried out under the code MRC. The project was also given the name Typhon.


Testing of an experimental launcher for the Tomahawk missile, August 2019

The command notes that the development of the MRC took a little time. It was possible to speed up all stages of the project due to the wide use of ready-made components and products, including the most important ones. At the same time, ship-based missile systems, which are widely used in the US Navy, became the main source of the units.

Thus, the land launcher was built on the basis of the components of the Mk 41 shipborne firing system. The fire control system uses the hardware and software of the Aegis shipborne information and control system. In addition, several existing serial missiles are used, and the range of ammunition can be expanded.

The MRC launcher is a semi-trailer with a lifting mechanism, on which four standard cells from the Mk 41 are located. Transport and launch containers with various types of missiles are loaded into them. The unit is protected from external impact by a housing with a movable top cover. A transport-loading module has also been developed. In this case, eight TPKs with missiles and reloading equipment on the launcher are placed on one semi-trailer.

The basic one weapons The Typhon complex will become the Tomahawk cruise missile in existing modifications. Depending on the modification, flight program, etc., such missiles are capable of hitting stationary targets at ranges of at least 1500-1600 km. Accordingly, "Typhon" with "Tomahawk" goes into the category of medium-range complexes.

The army does not yet have clear plans to equip the MRC complex with hypersonic ground-to-ground missiles, but does not exclude such a possibility. If an appropriate decision is made, then the ground complex will most likely receive hypersonic weapons created for ships.


PrSM rocket launch

It is curious that the complex will have not only strike capabilities. So, in FY2024 or later, the Pentagon plans to arm the MRC with the next Block 6B SM-1 anti-aircraft missile. This version of the missile defense system will be distinguished by hypersonic speed and a range of at least 700-740 km. It cannot be ruled out that the complex will be equipped with other anti-aircraft missiles of the "standard" series of the Navy.

"Mid-Range Capabilities"


The US Army has received the first MRC battery pack and deliveries will continue for the foreseeable future. How soon the second battery will be built and handed over depends on the current development process and future tests. The total number of vehicles to build, in turn, will determine the command.

Last year, the Pentagon reported that the ground forces needed at least 4-5 divisions of MRC complexes. Each such connection will include three missile batteries - four launchers each. Mobile execution will allow you to quickly transfer complexes to critical areas and carry out strikes or organize defense. One battery can simultaneously keep up to 12 different types of missiles on combat duty.

The MRC Typhon complex will be used in the advanced weapons system of the missile forces, along with other promising equipment and weapons. It will take an intermediate position between the other two new missile systems and will take on part of the combat missions.

So, at ranges up to 500 km, the army will have to use the new PrSM ballistic missile launched by the M270 or M142 installations. In the future, the PrSM range is planned to be increased to 750-1000 km. The emergence of such weapons, as in the case of the Typhon, is facilitated by the absence of the INF Treaty.


Hypersonic complex LRHW

At ranges from 500-1000 to 1500 km or more, fire missions will be solved by the promising MRC complex with the Tomahawk missile. In the future, its area of ​​​​responsibility may increase due to the integration of new ammunition, incl. hypersonic missiles. At the same time, he will be able not only to attack ground targets, but also to participate in air defense, complementing other land systems.

The development of a ground-based complex with a LRHW Dark Eagle hypersonic missile is also ongoing. He will be able to attack targets at a distance of at least 2775 km. At the same time, a new ammunition with increased flight characteristics will have to provide a solution to more complex fire missions, and will also provide some new opportunities.

It is curious that the “medium” MRC missile system is considered a higher priority development than the hypersonic LRHW. By using existing missiles, the Typhon system will be easier and cheaper to manufacture and operate. In addition, greater application flexibility will be achieved. However, MRC in terms of quantity and distribution will be inferior to the even simpler and cheaper PrSM rocket.

New stages


Thus, the development of the promising MRC Typhon missile system has been completed, and the project is entering a new stage. The personnel will have to master new equipment and conduct experimental missile launches. If all tests pass without problems and delays, then by the end of the new financial year, the missile system will have to officially enter service and reach initial operational readiness.

In parallel, the industry will prepare mass production of new equipment, and after FY2023. The following batteries will be handed over to the Pentagon. The construction of complexes for five divisions will take several more years, and after that the US Army will receive the desired "medium-range capabilities." Whether it will be possible to fulfill all the current plans on schedule and obtain all the desired types of weapons, time will tell.
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    9 December 2022 06: 10
    And Gorbachev, before the collapse of the Soviet Union, sawed 2000 heavy ground-based ballistic missiles, short and medium range. Now, such missiles could be great for destroying bridges and other large objects.
    1. +14
      9 December 2022 08: 19
      Thirty years have passed since Gorbachev's departure. During this time, it was possible to do a huge amount of work on the bugs.
    2. +2
      9 December 2022 15: 14
      In 30 years, the fuel would have already degraded. Well, the generation is different.
  2. +2
    9 December 2022 06: 51
    Instead of "caliber" carrier ships, it is cheaper to build such rocket carriers. Operation is 2 orders of magnitude cheaper and the service life is longer (the body does not rust).
    1. -2
      10 December 2022 02: 12
      smart fellow, if you suddenly need it, will you also deliver Caliber to the desired point by sea on land-based rocket carriers? We need both ships and ground complexes!
  3. 0
    9 December 2022 06: 57
    It has long been suggested to make universal ones with the possibility of placing "Caliber" on the basis of the S-300/400 complexes (they did it in China), even "Onyx M" / "Zircon" can be based on the S-300V4.
    It has long reached everyone - ours are in the process ...
    1. +3
      9 December 2022 12: 16
      Firstly, there is Iskander (There is already a stripped-down CR R500), secondly, there is its BR (it can increase the range), thirdly, we also have UYA (ship) and they can be transferred to land and Caliber and new zircons. Fourthly, in the experimental version, there is a container version of Calibers of 4 pieces in a PU container.
      1. 0
        10 December 2022 08: 24
        Alas, alas ... As an example, it is one thing to place additional Iskander regiments in Cuba or in the European part, and it is quite another to be able to strike from the positions of any air defense regiment from the same (or very similar) container launchers (and ours then the shelves are also mobile)
        Hope to decipher
        do you need advantages that radically change the strategic situation?. Moreover, it does not require any special expenses.
        We need to think more flexible and look wider)))
        1. 0
          10 December 2022 22: 57
          Disagree. Then there were no ICBMs .... the task of hitting the territory of the United States was achieved both qualitatively and quantitatively. But (on the example of Ukraine), the task of defeating the European theater of operations (especially with conventional warheads) is still a problem for us. And the EU is turning into a springboard for attacking the Russian Federation (maybe not attacks, but pressure) and the balance of conventional weapons is not in our favor. Therefore, it is necessary to resolve the issue of shooting through Western Europe
          1. 0
            10 December 2022 23: 09
            Quote: Zaurbek
            Therefore, it is necessary to resolve the issue of shooting through Western Europe

            Where is the contradiction?
            place in Cuba or in the European part

            And the strategic advantage over the main enemy is still relevant, so that covert deployment in the same Cuba (but I like Anadyr more), at the right time, will not be superfluous
            1. 0
              10 December 2022 23: 19
              I don’t know why they climb to break the INF Treaty? They have a shaft of ship Tomogawks and a shaft of aircraft and a bunch of bases around the world. RUSSIA was in a losing position here. They themselves give us a reason to make INF, while we have all the necessary technologies and ready-made factories for this. So there are many places on our territory where you can put in the mines
              1. 0
                11 December 2022 08: 22
                So they have confidence that the answer will be a mirror one - their INF in Europe - our INF in the European part, which is absolutely on the drum for America. there will be no direct threat to their territory. The question is how ready our leadership is for such games and whether they will be afraid to insert an awl in the American ass.
                1. 0
                  11 December 2022 14: 16
                  1. Now there is no shortage of ICBMs.
                  2. US bases in the range of the IRBM
                  3. On the example of 404, we see the war by proxy.
                  1. 0
                    11 December 2022 14: 48
                    1. The number of ICBMs is limited by START - parity (and not enough)
                    2.Foreign bases and US territory. they are two different situations
                    3. An example with 404 is an example of how ... I hope instructive.
                    1. 0
                      11 December 2022 15: 41
                      That's right, the ICBM blocks the destruction of all NATO countries many times. And in response to the American IRBM, an ICBM will fly.
                      1. 0
                        11 December 2022 16: 22
                        ICBMs are ICBMs, INF is INF, START is START, and there is no INF Treaty, you don’t need to mix everything together, but the fact that 1500 strategic nuclear charges are not enough for everyone is a fact (not even enough for the United States, and even these are far away not everyone will be able to fly)
                      2. 0
                        11 December 2022 21: 43
                        America is shooting at the Russian Federation with ballistic missiles ...... What are the options for the development of the event?
                        1. This is an American rocket
                        2. Allies.
  4. +3
    9 December 2022 09: 20
    It's time to roll out the Pioneer-2, the MIRBM with MIRV is the only adequate answer! soldier
    IMHO hi
    1. +1
      9 December 2022 12: 18
      Or Pioneer-2 or BR from Iskander (Dagger) to increase by one step. Using the MiG31 as an example, the BR began to fly up to 2t km.
      1. 0
        9 December 2022 12: 39
        I would break off a step from Yars - both MIRV and missile defense systems are already in the basic configurationwink
        1. 0
          9 December 2022 12: 44
          It all depends on the threats .... Pioneer (half-YARS) was up to 5tkm ..... whatever super Iskander with + step will be up to 2x. Hence the chassis and infrastructure. And previously there were no Calibers and X-101s with conventional warheads and high accuracy.
  5. +1
    9 December 2022 10: 24
    It is curious that the “medium” MRC missile system is considered a higher priority development than the hypersonic LRHW

    Well, it's obvious. "Hypersonic" is a PR term, what is hidden behind this word (which product with which performance characteristics) is not clear. And the subsonic, old and reliable Tomahawk, here it is in the warehouse, take it and shoot.
  6. +1
    9 December 2022 10: 25
    Here it is "ABM" in the countries of Eastern Europe, which they were going to mark against Iran (actually against us) for a long time. What our people constantly talked about and about the lack of guarantees ...
    Let's not deal with Ukraine, they can "accommodate" there as well. Cold War 2.0, only INF at the very borders, and even mobile.
    1. 0
      9 December 2022 12: 04
      Quote: Evgen_71
      and also mobile.

      Pershings were also mobile. But the borders were in a different place a little.
      Quote: Evgen_71
      they can stay there

      By itself. Then they will come near Smolensk. In Estonia and Finland there are already Haimars / M270, from there they get to St. Petersburg.
      Quote: Evgen_71
      Here it is "ABM" in the countries of Eastern Europe, which they were going to mark against Iran (actually against us) for a long time

      That's how it was posted in case you didn't know. And this is cheap kipesh from the Russian TV: in fact, the usual Arleigh Burke is standing on the shore. The same Burke with the same capabilities can at any time calmly enter the sea, both Black and Baltic. So these stations did not give any new opportunities in terms of attack.
    2. -1
      10 December 2022 02: 20
      Evgen about their "PRO" I agree with you 100%! They placed against Iran - yes, of course, "against Iran."
      We need to place our missiles in the countries of South America! I don't see any other option.
  7. +1
    9 December 2022 12: 12
    The command notes that the development of the MRC took a little time. It was possible to speed up all stages of the project due to the wide use of ready-made components and products, including the most important ones. At the same time, ship-based missile systems, which are widely used in the US Navy, became the main source of the units.

    Thus, the land launcher was built on the basis of the components of the Mk 41 shipborne firing system. The fire control system uses the hardware and software of the Aegis shipborne information and control system. In addition, several existing serial missiles are used, and the range of ammunition can be expanded.



    A year ago, on the website "Military Parity", everyone was foaming at the mouth and proving to me that the missile defense system in Poland and Romania is "different" and that Axes cannot be fired from it .... And the KR for Iskander cannot fly 500 km.
    1. 0
      9 December 2022 14: 55
      A year ago, on the website "Military parity" everyone argued to me with foam at the mouth that the missile defense system in Poland and Romania was "different" and that Axes should not be fired from it

      They cannot be allowed.
      Not all Mk41s can launch Tomahawks. Of those in Romania and Poland, it’s impossible, the design of the launchers does not allow, there are no modules for preparing and launching Tomahawks
      1. 0
        10 December 2022 01: 52
        solar, but I think that you can launch TOMAHAWK from Mk41. Pay attention to this ⬇️

        1. -2
          10 December 2022 03: 24
          solar, but I think that you can launch TOMAHAWK from Mk41. Pay attention to this ⬇️

          Not all Mk41s can launch Tomahawks. Of those in Romania and Poland, it’s impossible, the design of the launchers does not allow, there are no modules for preparing and launching Tomahawks

          It is formally possible to charge, but it is impossible to shoot, they are not equipped for this. Not all Mk41 cells allow you to shoot all types of missiles, even if they fit into them. This applies not only to Tomahawks, but also to the ECSM, for example, which formally will enter any Mk41 cell. Or Asrokami, or SM-3. They will enter, but they will not be able to shoot.
  8. 0
    10 December 2022 01: 47
    ATACMS, HIMARS. MRC Typhon - this is really very serious!

  9. 0
    10 December 2022 02: 03
    And on the approach of the PrSM missile with a range of up to 500 km, and in the future with a range of up to 750 - 1000 km. And the LRHW hypersonic complex.
    Our enemy does not sleep!!! So we need to be on the lookout!
  10. 0
    10 December 2022 02: 42
    Quote: smart fellow

    smart fellow (Spectator)
    Yesterday, 06: 51
    NEW
    +3
    Instead of "caliber" carrier ships, it is cheaper to build such rocket carriers. Operation is 2 orders of magnitude cheaper and the service life is longer (the body does not rust).

    Yeah. Only ships on the Sea of ​​Okhotsk will approach the launch range, there’s nothing to say about SSBNs, but to release such a miracle from storage boxes during a snowstorm -
    a couple of days before the exercises, the snow in the fleet will have to be raked.
    I raked two nights before "sudden exercises" for ordinary cars.
    The gate behind the snowdrifts did not open...
  11. 0
    11 December 2022 00: 11
    Dimensions like those of the Yars PGRK ... Iskander-M against its background is a masterpiece.
  12. 0
    26 January 2023 10: 22
    This is something between Caliber and Iskander. By and large, here, too, mattresses have lagged behind the Russians.