Unmanned mystery: an unknown boat on the Crimean coast

109
Unmanned mystery: an unknown boat on the Crimean coast

This week it became known that the Ukrainian formations, with all the necessary secrecy, received new unmanned boats. They have already tried to use such a technique to solve a real problem, but this mission failed. A boat of unknown type and purpose ended up on the shore and was discovered, and later destroyed for security reasons.

Failed mission


News about an unknown product, probably used by the Kyiv regime, appeared this Wednesday, September 21. First, specialized resources and blogs reported about the unusual find, and soon Russian officials took the floor. Information from the Ukrainian side has not yet been received - probably, Kyiv is still trying to maintain secrecy.



An unknown boat was found on Wednesday on the Black Sea coast near the city of Sevastopol. The object lay on the rocks and was unable to return to the sea. It was not possible to identify the boat by its appearance. There was no marking indicating the manufacturer or nationality. On the nose of the hull there were letters and numbers applied by hand not in production.

Later it became known that emergency services arrived at the scene of discovery. They studied the object and considered it potentially dangerous. It was decided to tow it out to sea and blow it up there. The moment of explosion and the fountain of spray were observed from the shore.

While the unmanned boat was on the shore, unknown witnesses managed to take several photos. They show the appearance of the product and allow you to determine some of its features. The internal structure of the boat, for obvious reasons, is unknown. However, the available amount of information provides a basis for some conclusions, estimates and assumptions.


View from a different angle, you can see the shape of the bottom

Apparently, the crewless boat is of foreign origin and was provided to Ukraine as part of military-technical assistance. Ukrainian formations tried to use it, but the results of such a mission are in question. Whether the task was accomplished is not clear; while a valuable sample was lost and violated secrecy.

foreign footprint


Over the past few months, foreign partners of the Kyiv regime have repeatedly spoken about the possible transfer of surface and underwater unmanned systems to it. At the same time, specific types of equipment were not named and only its purpose and some possibilities were indicated. Accordingly, the recent find from near Sevastopol cannot be unambiguously linked to any of the official statements.

Back in April, the United States included some unmanned systems in the next package of military-technical assistance. A Pentagon spokesman noted that these will be surface watercraft suitable for various tasks in the context of coastal defense. At the same time, the type of such equipment, quantity, etc. remained unknown. The shipment of such complexes, if carried out, was held in secrecy.

Not so long ago, at the end of August, similar plans were announced by the British military department. It planned to transfer six unnamed unmanned underwater vehicles to Ukraine. By the time this information was disclosed, the British fleet had already started training Ukrainian operators. The transfer of the first devices was expected in the near future.

Which of these supplies is related to the "Sevastopol" drone, unknown. It cannot be ruled out that this episode of technical assistance was not publicized at all and was fully implemented behind closed doors. And its existence became known only now, and because of an unsuccessful mission.


It should be noted that the boat does not look like any known example of such equipment. This fact suggests that we are talking about a completely new foreign development. Moreover, this complex could be created specifically for delivery to Ukraine, as was the case with some types of UAVs.

Thus, who developed and produces a crewless boat, why it is needed and how it got to Ukraine is unknown. Perhaps the situation will become clearer in the future. If the Kyiv regime received several of these items, it will try to use them again. And these episodes will probably help complete the existing picture.

Characteristic appearance


The found object was an unmanned boat with a traditional hull shape and a rudimentary superstructure. Almost all external elements were painted black or dark gray - for covert movement on the surface of the water. The length of the product can be estimated within 2-3 m. The displacement is up to several hundred kilograms.

The structure is made of metal and/or plastic parts. The hull received vertical sides and a V-shaped underwater part. The superstructure had a complex curved shape with protruding sections and probably served as a casing for internal equipment. On its bow were placed transverse shields to protect against splashes. On the bow and near the stern on the deck, removable covers are visible for access inside. Perhaps there are connectors under them for connection, etc.

Apparently, the boat received an electric power plant. There should be room in the stern for the propeller motor. A jet propulsion is visible under the aft end. Batteries are placed in the free volumes of the case, providing energy for movement and for the operation of various devices.


View of the stern and water cannon

The running and maneuvering characteristics of the boat cannot be assessed. It can be assumed that the water jet propulsion allows to develop significant speeds. At the same time, the battery charge was enough to sail to Sevastopol from areas controlled by Ukraine.

Directly on the bow of the boat there was a small-sized video camera. A movable base with a two-channel optical system was placed on the superstructure. In the stern was a casing of a characteristic shape of unclear purpose. Maybe it's a communications antenna. The exact composition of the internal equipment is unknown, but it is clear that the boat needs an autopilot and / or a remote control system, a navigation system and two-way communication with the operator.

Two round elements of unknown purpose are visible on the stem of the hull. A version is proposed, according to which the boat is the carrier of the warhead, and two "eyes" on the nose act as a target sensor. Such an assessment is not confirmed by anything, but it has the right to life. The general appearance, equipment and possible layout of the internal volumes allow the boat to be a kind of "loitering ammunition".

It can be assumed that the boat combines reconnaissance and strike functions. Its small size, low profile and coloring allow it to covertly move around the waters, and two cameras provide driving and monitoring. The boat can stay in a given area for some time and transmit data. If it is equipped with a warhead, then after the observation phase, an attack and defeat of the found target can follow.

It is obvious that somewhere on the Ukrainian territory there was an operator's console from which the boat was controlled, and other equipment from the complex. There should also be a crew that managed to disrupt the task, bring the product to the shore and declassify it.


The use of the boat in the representation of the artist

New threat


Ukrainian formations sent their new unmanned boat to Sevastopol, the main base of the Black Sea fleet. This means that the enemy is again trying to threaten our ships and their crews. In this regard, it is necessary to take certain measures that will rule out the success of another unmanned mission.

As part of the Black Sea Fleet, as in other associations, there are anti-sabotage special forces that protect bases and ships. They probably already know about the new threat and have even developed ways to counter it. To combat unmanned boats, all existing means of protecting water areas can be used.

In addition, it should be noted that the unknown boat depends on radio communications. Accordingly, electronic intelligence and combat systems will be an effective means against it. Under the influence of interference, the next boats can also involuntarily “stick” to the stones on the shore.

Unknown novelty


Thus, a new model of foreign equipment, possibly with the functions of weapons, appeared at the disposal of the Ukrainian formations. They are already trying to use it, but so far without success. At the same time, it was not possible to keep the boat secret, and now not only the Russian military, but also the interested part of the public knows about it.

It is obvious that our fleet is already taking the necessary measures and is ready to fight the new threat. This means that the next attempts to use boats will again run into problems and will also not be successful. And it cannot be ruled out that the next such sample will fall into the hands of Russian specialists intact, will be subjected to careful study and reveal all its secrets.
109 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -11
    25 September 2022 04: 16
    We also have marine drones. "Poseidon" are called ... Well, dream up, pop up, moor (in automatic mode), suppose there is some object near the Tower ... a second, similar one, anchored in the Potomac. And in the Potomac, such crayfish.
    1. +15
      25 September 2022 05: 30
      Quote: Zyablicev43
      We also have naval drones. "Poseidon" are called ...

      At all major exhibitions now, our drone boats are demonstrated, designed, in particular, for the protection of water areas. Where are they now? Experienced only?
      1. +27
        25 September 2022 06: 11
        In the same place where all these years there were UAVs, "smart ammunition", protection systems for armored vehicles .. - at exhibitions and in peppy reports upstairs about the mastered funds ...
        1. Elf
          0
          4 October 2022 17: 54
          As well as Almaty, Coalitions, Boomerangs and other Pacers.
          By the way, maybe they sank Moscow with such a boat?
      2. +29
        25 September 2022 06: 38
        Receive such a "gift" and destroy? Let him lie on the shore in anticipation of self-liquidation, which is unlikely to happen, but during this time they came up with something. And so they dragged it into the sea and blew it up. This begs the question: maybe this is a secret development of the special services of the Navy? For what was destroyed in the sea is unknown: either the object itself, or they made an imitation.
        Information for consideration ...
        1. +1
          25 September 2022 07: 20
          Quote: aleks neym_2
          Receive such a "gift" and destroy? Let him lie on the shore in anticipation of self-destruction,

          There are two answers: 1. Was it definitely blown up, because it was not confirmed by anything 2. Perhaps for our special services this unit is not a secret novelty, which is why they banged.
          1. AUL
            -2
            25 September 2022 08: 49
            Such systems, by definition, must have a very powerful "non-removable" system with a bunch of electronic sensors. So they did not risk people in vain, and they did the right thing!
            1. +6
              25 September 2022 09: 48
              So they did not risk people in vain, and they did the right thing!

              How about remotely? Ripped to pieces with a pair of tractors, cut off the tail-nose? After all, you can’t even see what’s there ... So, it wasn’t too necessary. They knew what the thing was.
              1. +8
                25 September 2022 12: 00
                Quote: dauria
                So it wasn't too necessary. They knew what the thing was.

                It's strange, it's strange ... It's strange - to be in trouble! (With) - as L. Gurchenko sang in a song about Babette.
                1. I will never believe that a new product is in. production was not interested in our intelligence agencies. This simply cannot be! We caught sea buoys in the sea and received awards for an excellent reconnaissance campaign. And if a mine or torpedo was rammed, then at least the order was received by the "excellent student" who ensured its delivery. During the Second World War, such products were disarmed by miners at the risk of their lives in order to find out the secrets of the enemy and his new weapons ... And then they dragged them into the sea and rushed ... Nonsense !!!
                2. Most likely, the specialists determined the "dill" origin of the craft, so they decided that it makes no sense to disarm the traps - to risk miners with specialists. So they let it go.
                3. Imported products without nameplates and plates with inscriptions - they simply do not exist! They even put the serial number, series and release date on "rubber products". Therefore, it’s not a thing from NATA ... Kuevskaya handicraft ... obviously with a trick to undermine specialists.
                Nevertheless, since they pulled it out and blew it up, it means that it was of no value to the Navy. And the fact that they did not take risks in vain is right.
                IMHO.
                1. +4
                  25 September 2022 19: 54
                  Everything is correct, but maybe they didn’t blow it up?
                  1. +2
                    25 September 2022 21: 09
                    Blew up, blew up! You really doubt it. wink
                    Alexander painted why they "blew up".
                    But even that is not a fact.
                    All this talk about "unrecoverable" for the poor. Now even fragments of destroyed equipment are being analyzed. And there are so many protruding parts that you can catch on with a cable and pull in different directions ... Something may suffer from an explosion, but something will remain intact. For example, feed with a water jet, and a muzzle with sensors.
                    During the Second World War, miners disarmed such products at the risk of their lives in order to find out the secrets of the enemy and his new weapons

                    Yes, it’s just visible here, several ways where to hook the cable, so that later it can be torn apart from a safe distance. Well, it will explode, so this is the same result as announced.
                    Therefore, 2 with a quarter options are possible:
                    1 This is "ours" or "not ours" garbage, but we already know everything about it, that's why we blew it up
                    2 The explosion was fake.
                    A quarter for a combination of 1 and 2.
            2. +4
              25 September 2022 23: 06
              Why people?! There are sappers, too.

              It was necessary to get more information about these naval drones, next time it won’t be so lucky and it won’t be thrown ashore, but we don’t know what kind of UAV it is, whether for reconnaissance and targeting precision-guided munitions that it illuminates with a laser, or whether it’s stuffed UAV kamikaze explosives.
            3. -1
              26 September 2022 01: 10
              People are more important than what they need to know, the rest is in the sea
            4. +1
              26 September 2022 23: 01
              There was such a film "Allegro with fire" (1979) - until you know how it works, the opposition will not be adequate.
          2. +1
            25 September 2022 15: 42
            perhaps everything that was interesting was taken out of the boat, and the remains, for the sake of appearance, were defiantly drowned. or perhaps they simply blew up the explosive package, to divert eyes, and the product itself is already being dissected where necessary.
            1. +3
              25 September 2022 17: 12
              Quote: PlotnikoffDD
              perhaps everything that was interesting was taken out of the boat, and the remains, for the sake of appearance, were defiantly drowned. or perhaps they simply blew up the explosive package, to divert eyes, and the product itself is already being dissected where necessary.

              If everything is as you write, then what for to blow it up? Why make this a secret? Rather just stupidly blew up.
          3. +2
            25 September 2022 18: 43
            So this is an American design. About a year ago, this development was already flashing on the net, as being being tested, even a photo of the upper part on the water could be seen. That's why they destroyed it, as a well-known object. Designed to protect the waters of the maritime borders, search for and destroy small surface targets.
        2. 0
          25 September 2022 22: 40
          Quote: aleks neym_2
          Receive such a "gift" and destroy? Let him lie on the shore in anticipation of self-liquidation, which would hardly have happened, but during this time they came up with something.

          Most likely self-destruction of this pestilence. a drone occurs when an attempt is made to interfere with its insides.
        3. 0
          26 September 2022 12: 58
          What is "written in the article" is one thing. What they really "did" with the BNA (unmanned surface vehicle ...) - no one will know for a long time. Simply, there is no need-S ...

          But, the fact that such UAVs (it is possible that they are also "multifunctional", low-noise, with the ability to covertly transport combat swimmers) can be used by enemy MTR forces when trying to land and capture the Russian Zaporozhye nuclear power plant is quite real ...
        4. 0
          26 September 2022 17: 48
          Receive such a "gift" and destroy?
          Do you always believe what is written? Moreover, this is not the first drone that has been discovered.
      3. +5
        25 September 2022 06: 43
        Quote: svp67
        Where are they now? Experienced only?

        In the same place as the rest of the innovations. And, as always, they will rant, like - "they will work out", "they will launch into a series", "they will put them in the troops." Once. Soon. But it is not exactly! Yes
        1. +8
          25 September 2022 08: 11
          The situation with supplies to the troops is very interesting. While they are working on their technologies, they are buying civilian drones in China. Before the operation on the outskirts, drones were considered a toy that did not deserve special attention. And six months later they became a classic of the genre of warfare! Like this! Penny products have become the main weapon of warfare! That's nuclear weapons for you! No one will twitch against a country with nuclear weapons! But they twitched! And what? Drones and portable anti-tank and anti-aircraft products. It turned out that we needed neither nuclear bombs, but night vision devices and infrared sights! It turned out that we needed normal individual radio stations, we needed real-time intelligence. It turned out that it would be nice to have shock drones hanging in the air for days. Makhno's fighting carts are steadily bombing the inhabitants of the LDNR. And where is our military-industrial complex with an antidote? What's on the boat? Yes, our intelligence about this boat stupidly overslept. How our intelligence sleeps and on other issues that allow the outskirts to conduct operations against Russia. Apparently, an optimization skating rink also took place there, which showed the unimportance of agents and the importance of large shoulder straps! hi
          1. 0
            26 September 2022 19: 34
            Quote: North Caucasus
            It turned out that we needed neither nuclear bombs, but night vision devices and infrared sights!

            Without nuclear bombs, we would have been torn to shreds back in the 90s, and we would not have enjoyed the 2000s in principle. Ukraine, stuffed by the West with all sorts of devices and MANPADS, ATGMs and drones, although unpleasant, is not fatal. It's like an immune booster. The West has not yet fully appreciated what it is turning Russia into with its step-by-step sanctions and inciting "little mutts".
            Quote: North Caucasus
            Yes, our intelligence about this boat stupidly overslept. How our intelligence sleeps and on other issues that allow the outskirts to conduct operations against Russia.

            The biggest stupidity is to build a conclusion on not enough information. If, as you say, intelligence "slept", then today we would have fought intensely and bloodily in the center of Donetsk.
            1. 0
              27 September 2022 07: 18
              The USSR with nuclear bombs, missiles, the Navy and Air Force with the army was torn into national shreds! Was deprived of science and industry. What weapon? Foreign currency!
              If, as you say, intelligence "slept", then today we would have fought intensely and bloodily in the center of Donetsk.
              If intelligence did not sleep, then the supplies of the West would have been destroyed on the way! Moreover, someone said that their supplies are our legitimate target for destruction! AND? Deliveries safely reach the front! Intelligence and data transmission of NATO is in real time. Judging by the steady shelling of our territories, our reconnaissance and data transfer is going on in the bullshit mode! Makhno's fighting carts rule!? By the way, the latest news. Foreigners praised Gerasimov as an intelligent officer of the General Staff. Looks like he did a good job! Gorbachev was also praised!
              1. 0
                27 September 2022 08: 28
                Quote: North Caucasus
                What weapon?

                The USSR was torn apart by national traitors from the CPSU and stupid bawlers with wet dreams from superficial knowledge. Why aren't you in intelligence? Let's go and teach how not to sleep, how to develop a strategy !!!
      4. +2
        25 September 2022 10: 00
        Quote: svp67
        Where are they now?

        As where? Yes, at the exhibitions, they themselves said.
  2. 0
    25 September 2022 04: 39
    Apparently, the crewless boat is of foreign origin and was provided to Ukraine as part of military-technical assistance.
    Well, where is this visibility?
    1. +2
      25 September 2022 11: 49
      Where did you see ours?
      ppppppp
      1. +5
        25 September 2022 13: 17
        I haven't seen it anywhere. The conclusion about foreign origin is not clear.
        There has always been a strong school of electronic engineers in Ukraine. And if even 10% managed to be saved in 30 years, then the guys will dump such a three-bladder and program it. In terms of the practical application of electronics, there are VERY good specialists there.
  3. +6
    25 September 2022 04: 48
    unknown witnesses managed to take several photographs.

    So the owner's marks, unknown in the photo, are visible.
    It was possible to determine the country of production by radio-electronic components ... in vain they hurried to blow up this product.
    1. +6
      25 September 2022 06: 29
      It is believed that a second drone was blown up in the sea, during its movement to the bay.
      1. +2
        25 September 2022 07: 56
        Quote: Tlauicol
        It is believed that a second drone was blown up in the sea, during its movement to the bay.

        And most likely such an opinion has a place to be in a real plane. Somehow it’s not “properly” just to take and unravel this rarest specimen, which snooped around our base with clearly not friendly intentions. winked
    2. +4
      25 September 2022 07: 41
      And what about electronic components can be installed? Well, China or Taiwan.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +6
    25 September 2022 04: 48
    It is a pity that they destroyed it, it would be nice to gut it. Of course, there was a risk of self-detonation, so we decided not to risk it ....
    1. The comment was deleted.
  5. +13
    25 September 2022 05: 06
    Hmm .... That is, some well-wishers, risking everything, managed to deliver the latest secret sample to us. On a silver platter, with a blue border ... But our specialists, having decided that this was a dangerous and ungrateful business, stupidly blew up a secret sample .. Well done, of course. Medals must be issued to everyone urgently .. Do you remember such an old film "Allegro with Fire"? Before, they knew the price of victims in the name of victory and in the name of the country .. but now - "well, fuck him, this technique is someone else's" .. Mediocre and insulting. And cowardly, in general .. what does he have, all the caps are non-removable? in the end, they would fry all the electronics in it and take it apart for yourself .. Now, after the explosion, the researchers will be able to confidently tell the authorities that the device had electronic filling, beautiful wires of different colors and a lot of screws ..
    1. +13
      25 September 2022 05: 32
      It was necessary to call the robot Fedya, he would have taken it apart. May be.
      1. +3
        25 September 2022 05: 59
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        It was necessary to call the robot Fedya, he would have taken it apart. May be.

        This one can... with two pistols and I'd take it to pieces.
    2. +4
      25 September 2022 06: 03
      I also remember this movie. I agree with all your conclusions.
    3. +1
      25 September 2022 06: 45
      Quote: Dikson
      But our specialists

      Or maybe it's "some of our well-wishers"? feel
    4. -2
      25 September 2022 10: 03
      I also remembered this film! There were people .. This is a real disgrace, cowardice and treason.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +6
    25 September 2022 05: 28
    The question is, why was it destroyed, and even at sea. They could have done this on the shore, then the remaining fragments could well give information about whose hand this product is
    1. +14
      25 September 2022 06: 18
      You know, maybe we underestimate our specialists too much? In general, without all the data, the "explosion of an unidentified object" can also be part of a distraction operation .. What and who blew it up and what - go and figure it out now .. The device could be quietly taken away for detailed study, and a couple of broken ones could be blown up in the sea washing machines and vacuum cleaners .. - well, for an oil painting .. - to the public, which likes to look at us through binoculars and satellite lenses ..? Well, I don’t believe that we don’t have people in our offices who understand the value of such “finds”
      1. +2
        25 September 2022 06: 52
        Quote: Dikson
        The device could be quietly taken away for a detailed study, and a couple of broken washing machines and vacuum cleaners could be blown up in the sea .. -

        It seems to me that this is the most likely version. Or they could actually destroy it if there was infa that something serious was on the drone. Well, let's say, a vigorous charge.
        1. +3
          25 September 2022 12: 45
          Quote: LIONnvrsk
          there is something serious on the drone. Well, let's say, a vigorous charge.

          Lenin said about the Decembrists: - They are terribly far from the people ... About you, he would say: - Comrade is terribly far from "vigorous charges"! laughing
          Or do you think that these "charges" lie scattered on the road - take whoever wants and as much as the soul needs? So this is unrealistic.
          But the dill may well slip a biological or chemical "byaka" there. They will become, calibrated nonhumans! am
    2. +1
      26 September 2022 12: 36
      In the same place in Sevastopol, at the beginning of the Second World War, scientists and sappers, risking their lives, studied the latest German acoustic bottom mines right ON THE COAST and found a way to deal with them. And now...
      It was decided to tow it out to sea and blow it up there. The moment of explosion and the fountain of spray were observed from the shore.
  8. +5
    25 September 2022 05: 36
    Thus, a new model of foreign equipment, possibly with the functions of weapons, appeared at the disposal of the Ukrainian formations.
    . Man, such a creature, strange! He creates a threat for himself, and then .... fights against it, with varying degrees of success.
  9. +5
    25 September 2022 05: 37
    What if this is an alien probe with artificial intelligence, sent to earth to establish contact? And they immediately took him and "booms" wassat
    1. 0
      25 September 2022 06: 15
      Quote: Amateur
      What if it's an alien probe with artificial intelligence,

      It's out of the question... an alien civilization that managed to fly to our planet on its superstarships will not shine so brightly in front of such primitive creatures as humans... we are highly organized ants or termites for them... nothing more.
      1. +5
        25 September 2022 06: 30
        will not shine in front of such primitive creatures as a person ... we are highly organized ants or termites for them ..

        People keep hamsters or fish and buy all sorts of expensive gadgets for them. drinks
    2. Alf
      +11
      25 September 2022 08: 48
      Quote: Amateur
      What if this is an alien probe with artificial intelligence, sent to earth to establish contact? And they immediately took him and "booms" wassat

      Do you think there are intelligent beings in the universe?
      Of course, there is.
      Why don't they contact us then?
      Because they are reasonable.
      1. +2
        25 September 2022 11: 08
        Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye! Platinum Words! good
    3. 0
      29 September 2022 18: 58
      Victor, I think that this is indeed "news" from aliens.
      There is only one subtlety.
      She (news) - not to establish contact.
      It is so that, firstly, people stop for a moment in this routine / everyday life and, at least, feel
      (or better, realized) that in the surrounding world there is a Force to which people are absolutely subject. These are the alien Curators of mankind.
      Secondly, They tell us with the help of this "news": guys, if you really "break the chain", we will not let you fall into the abyss.
  10. +2
    25 September 2022 05: 43
    Thus, a new model of foreign equipment, possibly with the functions of weapons, appeared at the disposal of the Ukrainian formations.

    There are specialists - let them figure it out, fix it, deliver the sender to the shores and launch ...
    What to look at them? yaknut? Send a Poseidon-type gift.
    Stop looking through your fingers at a bunch of idiots who dream of destroying Russia. Have them stick their fingers into electrical outlets.
    1. +4
      25 September 2022 05: 52
      There are specialists - let them figure it out, fix it, deliver the sender to the shores and launch ...

      And what to do? He's blown up. The divers probably picked up the fragments, but was it better to study them in their entirety?
      1. 0
        25 September 2022 08: 46
        Quote: Check
        And what to do? He's blown up.

        Thanks, figured it out...
    2. +1
      25 September 2022 12: 53
      Quote: yuriy55
      Have them stick their fingers into electrical outlets.

      There is a "golden rule" of an electrician!
      - DO NOT stick your fingers into the socket: they won't fit anyway - they are THICKER than plug holes!!! laughing
      Did they not explain this to them!? belay
  11. +3
    25 September 2022 05: 45
    Apparently, the boat received an electric power plant. In the stern there should be a place for the propeller motor. A jet propulsion is visible under the aft end.

    ..... I wonder why and how, two types of propellers are implemented on such a small vessel, .... propeller and water jet ....
    1. 0
      25 September 2022 08: 48
      Quote: Streck
      ..... I wonder why and how, two types of propellers are implemented on such a small vessel, .... propeller and water jet ....

      I assume that because of the inherent ability to move on the surface of the water and under water.
      1. 0
        25 September 2022 12: 42
        I assume that because of the inherent ability to move on the surface of the water and under water.
        For movement under water, completely different forms are needed, this typical surface waterer. Screw - for cruising mode, water jet - for sneaking mode (less acoustic visibility).
        1. 0
          25 September 2022 14: 30
          Quote: Aviator_
          For movement under water, completely different forms are needed, this typical surface waterer.

          I won’t argue, because they didn’t have time to find out the performance characteristics - they destroyed it ... Unless you disassembled the copy ...
          For a depth of several meters, a special shape and tightness are not required - there are watches for diving up to 100 meters ...
          1. +2
            25 September 2022 15: 26
            It's not tightness, there are no problems with this. For diving / ascent, rudders are needed, which are on any p / l, but are completely absent on this sample. Something like this.
            1. 0
              26 September 2022 13: 16
              And not only. If this is a radio-controlled unit, then it must have a good remote antenna if it will dive. For water jams the radio signal very strongly (and this thing is clearly not enough for long-wave transmission). Therefore, even if it sinks, then the maximum to the height of the antenna, i.e. semi-submersible. The antenna is most likely flat, on the rear ledge.
              The use of two types of propulsion, I think, is controllability. Those. the main screw provides thrust, and the two propulsion holes regulate the course.
      2. 0
        25 September 2022 12: 55
        This kayak was even able to crawl out onto land. Definitely unearthly.
    2. +1
      25 September 2022 10: 13
      .... I wonder why and how, two types of propellers are implemented on such a small vessel, .... propeller and water jet

      They put oarlocks for oars on motor boats ... wink So here too. You never know what happened with the main installation, and here the place for the outboard motor is ready - I stuck it in and drove off. Or I saved the resource and battery charge for silent running, increasing the total range. :
  12. +8
    25 September 2022 05: 50
    Later it became known that emergency services arrived at the scene of discovery. They studied the object and considered it potentially dangerous. It was decided to tow it out to sea and blow it up there.

    Was he on the shore next to some objects? But, even if so, why couldn't it not be "towed and blown up", but towed to a deserted place, maybe to some old barge in the same sea and started to be studied by sapper robots? At least open the box? Difficulty with robots? Remote mini-explosion from the stern and examine the insides with an endoscope?
    1. KCA
      +6
      25 September 2022 06: 32
      And how do we know that the drone was blown up? We were told so? Who saw that he was not "towed to a deserted place", but "blew up"? Maybe just disinformation, well, so that the enemies calm down?
    2. +1
      25 September 2022 16: 40
      This place is called Soldier's Beach.
  13. +3
    25 September 2022 07: 11
    It's strange, usually such novelties are immediately transferred for study in spices - but here they just "destroyed" them?
  14. +1
    25 September 2022 07: 29
    Quote: svp67
    At all major exhibitions now, our drone boats are demonstrated, designed, in particular, for the protection of water areas. Where are they now? Experienced only?

    Somehow, our manufacturer first of all thinks about export. Apparently waiting for orders. Yes, more. business eclmn
  15. 0
    25 September 2022 07: 31
    Quote: KCA
    And how do we know that the drone was blown up? We were told so? Who saw that he was not "towed to a deserted place", but "blew up"? Maybe just disinformation, well, so that the enemies calm down?

    And how to open it? Who will climb? There are actually some options...
  16. 0
    25 September 2022 07: 35
    Structure made of metal and / or plastic parts.
    And if they had blown up not in the sea, but on land, then they knew for sure! fool or pests.
  17. 0
    25 September 2022 07: 50
    another cheers-ryabovshchina, the author, as always, got past
  18. 0
    25 September 2022 07: 55
    Most likely, the device in unmanned mode followed GPS coordinates. Maybe they gave the opportunity to work on electronic warfare ... As a result, I got a little lost and ended up on the shore.
  19. -3
    25 September 2022 08: 11
    Maybe this one drowned "Moscow"?
    Well, or more.
    1. +2
      25 September 2022 08: 31
      During the exercises, the Americans have already sunk their decommissioned frigates Oliver Perry twice. And not once, not with one or two missiles
      "Harpoon", they didn't sink!
      1. 0
        25 September 2022 13: 00
        "Harpoon" can set fire to a working ship, and a decommissioned tin can be broken with a torpedo.
      2. 0
        29 September 2022 06: 52
        What does "didn't sink" mean? Did they immediately go to the bottom or did they stay on the water for another day? Then, the rocket hits from above or into the side, so the question is: did they have holes? And the last thing: how many BCs detonated on these decommissioned frigates? Well, the question of gouging is also not closed.
  20. 0
    25 September 2022 08: 13
    I had to gut it anyway. There should be questions for those who made the decision to destroy.
  21. +1
    25 September 2022 08: 26
    There is conflicting information. There was a message that there were two boats, one was blown up at sea, the second was found on the shore. Logic suggests that the discovered boat, of unknown origin with curious technology, does not need to be blown up, but there is a need to study this object!)))
    1. +2
      25 September 2022 09: 56
      This is a surface kamikaze drone and transporting it to a study site is tantamount to destroying this place with all personnel.
      1. -1
        29 September 2022 07: 09
        Do you think it's impossible? What if you think about it?
  22. +1
    25 September 2022 09: 23
    Came to us on his own.
    Why blew it up? What about studying?
    1. +3
      25 September 2022 10: 26
      Quote: Not the fighter
      Came to us on his own.
      Why blew it up? What about studying?

      The next one will sail, you will come, you will sit on top of 200 kg of explosives and you will study .....
  23. +1
    25 September 2022 12: 33
    Weird! If everything is so "modern" cameras, sensors, antennas + some degree of secrecy - why was this product not provided with a system of self-destruction or destruction (in case of emergency) by the operator. It was not worth destroying it - it was necessary to try to disassemble (open) 777 after placing it in a safe room protected from electromagnetic waves.
  24. -1
    25 September 2022 13: 05
    Experts with critical thinking gathered))
    No one has created anything effective in his life, but how they like to criticize)))
    The Russian Federation has new things only at exhibitions, and it doesn’t matter that most of this new stuff has already been at the front for 6 months.
    Something tells me that 90% of those commenting on this are liberda and dill. Because as soon as these people point blank they don’t see anything new at the front, even based on tons of vidos. "The Throwers Attack"
    1. -1
      26 September 2022 20: 01
      Yes, you can’t please these all-propellers, everything is always wrong with them. The T-90 was not blown up during the "regrouping" - they raised a howl why they didn't blow it up! Now, on the contrary, they blew up a secret enemy drone, so they yell "AAA! Why blew it up!" This is how it always is, you will never please them, they will always be dissatisfied.
  25. +1
    25 September 2022 13: 17
    Pardon my ignorance, but it needed to be tested.
    The fleet is already a slacker: the APU has a "harpoon".
    What about proivorvkets?
  26. 0
    25 September 2022 14: 42
    pas nécessairement besoin d'un pilote, peut être autonome
    https://www.aluship.com/news/the-mayflower-autonomous-ship-has-reached-north-america/
  27. 0
    25 September 2022 15: 58
    The Ukrainian formations sent their new unmanned boat to Sevastopol, the main base of the Black Sea Fleet.
    Are boom barriers already an archaism? sad
  28. 0
    25 September 2022 16: 16
    NATO has long passed to Ukraine with its operators secret equipment in the form of underwater and surface drones. Perhaps it was with such devices that the primary defeat was inflicted on the cruiser Moskva. This explains the deathly silence of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation - they themselves did not understand where it all actually came from. As a matter of priority, it is necessary to recognize NATO as a party to the conflict, and to break off diplomatic relations with the most odious representatives of this bloc. This will allow without any warning (if they do not come to their senses) to deliver a thermonuclear strike first. For only under these conditions there are chances not to lose the war.
  29. 0
    25 September 2022 16: 17
    Looks like something like this:
    The United States will supply Kyiv with unmanned boats MANTAS T-12
    14 May 2022, 18: 19

    Ukraine will receive a batch of miniature unmanned stealth boats of the MANTAS T-12 type. Ukrainian operators of these drones have already completed a training course at the US Naval Air Station Little Creek, in Virginia.

    Most likely, boats of the MANTAS T-12 type will soon appear in the Black Sea near Odessa and Snake Island. They are intended for reconnaissance, but can also be used as strike weapons.

    The boat type MANTAS T-12 has a hull length of 3,6 m; width - 0,9 m, rises above the sea surface by only 18 centimeters; maintains seaworthiness in a storm up to 4 points; its cruising range is up to 120 miles; estimated payload 63,5 kg; maximum speed - 40 knots.
    https://argumenti.ru/army/2022/05/771961
    1. +1
      25 September 2022 17: 30
      The boat you indicated is a catamaran and, in addition to reconnaissance equipment, has a superstructure with antennas. The destroyed boat is most likely intended for finding and destroying a target, and not for reconnaissance.
      [Center]
      1. 0
        25 September 2022 19: 34
        That's why I pointed out that "...something like this:" as an example of supplies. And finally, purely outwardly - it looks like boats - drones that smugglers use.
    2. +1
      25 September 2022 17: 33
      There are other catamaran type stealth boats
  30. +1
    25 September 2022 17: 13
    It reminds me of something. The tourist club was robbed, covered with tin and got a super boat


  31. 0
    25 September 2022 17: 24
    Taken out to sea and blown up!!!??? Funny! I did believe it!!! And then they will catch it and HERE then they will study !!!! Well comedians! I give my head to cut off that this kayak has already been dismantled for rivets, signed and studied .....
  32. 0
    25 September 2022 18: 00
    And why not study it in more detail, what were they afraid of - undermining or something else?
  33. 0
    25 September 2022 18: 05
    It is obvious that our fleet is already taking the necessary measures and is ready to fight the new threat. This means that the next attempts to use boats will again run into problems and will also not be successful. And it cannot be ruled out that the next such sample will fall into the hands of Russian specialists intact, will be subjected to careful study and reveal all its secrets.
    Well, yes, as usual ... But what prevented this, a whole, instance from being studied and why should we wait for the next one to appear?
    1. +1
      25 September 2022 18: 35
      Since the object is so dangerous, how did they manage to tow it into the sea, it was necessary to blow it up on the shore at the place of discovery, and then study the wreckage.
  34. +1
    26 September 2022 04: 48
    So this can be the development of Russian military amateurs?
    Lost her at sea. Batteries ran out. And outsiders civilians accidentally found on the beach, clicked from all sides, since many have mobile phones.
    When the competent authorities arrived, who were already informed that it was, dragged the product from the beach, dropped a depth bomb into the sea, or simply bang from the gun, the main thing is that there should be an explosion. To the public. And the boat went on to the test.
  35. 0
    28 September 2022 13: 02
    I saw this in the movie "The Secret of Two Oceans".
  36. 0
    28 September 2022 20: 52
    In my unenlightened view, gentlemen, the case is molded from a composite.
    Too glossy and smooth surface from all angles. You will not achieve such glossiness even with AMG riveting. And puttying a disposable boat ... Who will appreciate this beauty and laboriousness? ..
    All I can say about this is unfortunately. hi
  37. 0
    29 September 2022 17: 24
    Scary, very scary! We don't know what it is, if we knew what it is, we don't know what it is!
  38. 0
    1 October 2022 18: 05
    Well, the boat, coolly said. More like a boat. How dangerous this horseradish, is not yet known. But, the number of explosives on board rather speaks of a mug of skillful hands than of a serious weapon.
  39. 0
    3 October 2022 09: 17
    Why destroy such a beautiful canoe/dori style boat. One could go fishing for a goby or a pelengas. Some problems with gims, of course, because the manufacturer's documents probably forgot to invest.
  40. 0
    4 October 2022 20: 22
    OBS level article. Two photos and a lot of water (verbal, and therefore a lot). Meanwhile, a Colombian businessman is quietly crying on the shore. Pedro Amorales. A whole boat of snowballs for Zeliboba's friend is gone!
  41. 0
    5 October 2022 18: 40
    By chance, get a sample of military equipment and simply destroy it? Unreasonable...
  42. 0
    29 October 2022 17: 26
    The topic was raised, could have been updated somehow)
  43. 0
    9 December 2022 01: 39
    I am sure that the Crimean bridge was blown up by something similar. It may not be a surface, but an underwater drone. A truck is a tale for the people.