Official Warning: DPRK Nuclear Policy Law

17
Official Warning: DPRK Nuclear Policy Law
ICBM "Hwaseong-15" at one of the last parades


On September 8, the DPRK leadership officially published the new Law on Policy on Nuclear Armed Forces. This document defines the role and mission of nuclear weapons in the country's strategic security, their goals and objectives in a conflict, as well as the principles and conditions for combat use. The publication of the law is aimed at informing third countries, incl. potential adversaries, and providing effective strategic deterrence.



Key provisions


The new law notes that the nuclear armed forces (NAF) are a powerful means of protecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity and interests of the DPRK. They must prevent war both on the Korean Peninsula and throughout Northeast Asia. It is also reported that the DPRK has reliable, effective and ready-to-use nuclear deterrence forces. They are ready to solve the assigned tasks in accordance with the adopted policy.

The goals of the publication of a new law on policy regarding nuclear forces are named. This move should prevent misjudgment between nuclear powers and the misuse of nuclear weapons. As a result, the risks of starting a nuclear war should be reduced.

The new law includes 11 clauses that define certain aspects of the policy in the field of nuclear weapons. The mission of the nuclear forces, their composition, the principles of command and control, as well as the implementation of decisions made, the principles and conditions for the use of nuclear weapons, issues of mobilization, permanent service and further development of nuclear weapons, as well as non-proliferation measures and measures of an organizational and legislative nature are consistently described.

For obvious reasons, the law dispenses with unnecessary details. Thus, paragraph 1 describes the mission of nuclear forces in the form of deterrence by creating a threat or inflicting defeat, but does not specify the exact strategies and tactics for using nuclear weapons. The composition of the YaVS is also described extremely vaguely: the corresponding paragraph only lists the presence of weapons, delivery vehicles, command systems, etc.


Promising missile "Hwaseong-17"

Paragraph 3 of the law indicates that the NAF is directly subordinate to the unified command of the Chairman of State Affairs of the DPRK, and he is authorized to resolve all relevant issues. At the same time, there are governing bodies designed to assist the Chairman in carrying out all activities.

In the event of a threat to the control loops, nuclear forces must immediately carry out a strike according to a pre-drawn and approved plan. In accordance with clause 4, orders for the use of nuclear weapons from the command are also carried out immediately.

Points 7 and 8 define the permanent mobilization of nuclear forces. At the same time, the conditions for the safe storage and operation of special combat units are determined. Item 9 calls for the strengthening and development of the YaVS. In addition, he determines the need for periodic updating of the nuclear doctrine in order to maintain its relevance.

Principles and conditions of application


Of particular interest is paragraph 5 of the law - "Principles of the use of nuclear weapons." In accordance with it, the DPRK intends to use nuclear warheads as the last response to external aggression, which poses a serious threat to the state and people. At the same time, the DPRK does not threaten its own nuclear weapons and does not use them against non-nuclear countries. However, only as long as they do not participate in aggression together with the nuclear powers.

Clause 6 introduces five conditions for the use of nuclear weapons against an aggressor. The reasons for this are the committed or expected attack using nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction or non-nuclear weapons, aimed at the country as a whole, its leadership, command structures or strategically important objects.


Promising missile for submarines "Pukkykson-5A"

In addition, nuclear warfare can be used to prevent the prolongation of an armed conflict. Nuclear weapons will also be a response to other circumstances associated with a catastrophic risk for the continued existence of the country and people.

Real Opportunities


In the context of the new law, it is mentioned that the DPRK already has a full-fledged nuclear force, showing the required efficiency and reliability. At the same time, the composition and capabilities of such nuclear warheads, for obvious reasons, are not specified. However, there is various information about the processes of development of these forces and their possible results.

Recall that the DPRK conducted the first test explosion of a nuclear charge in 2006. In 2017, the first tests of a thermonuclear weapon took place. To date, several nuclear tests have been carried out, which shows the ability of the industry to manufacture, at a minimum, single warheads. However, there are also bolder assessments.

Various foreign sources report that the DPRK was able to establish the production of weapons-grade plutonium. Several tens of kilograms of this raw material are produced annually, which is enough to produce 10-12 ammunition with a capacity of tens of kilotons. Such charges can be used as part of combat units for existing and future missiles. By now, the YaVS could receive at least several dozen warheads.

The DPRK army has a wide range of missile systems for various purposes. It is armed with operational-tactical systems, short and medium-range missiles. In recent years, a number of new intercontinental missiles have been developed. In addition, work continues on the subject of submarine missiles. Most of the existing or being created missile systems can use both conventional and special warheads. How difficult it is to replace combat equipment is unknown.


Operational-tactical missile system in the railway version

Apparently, the current plans of the command provide for the use of nuclear warheads on the IRBM or ICBM. Due to the high flight characteristics, such delivery vehicles should ensure the maximum effect from the use of nuclear weapons.

So, by now, the Hwaseong-14 and Hwaseong-15 ICBMs, the range of which can reach 10-12 thousand km, could have entered service. This year, tests of the Hwaseong-17 complex took place with an estimated range of at least 13 thousand km. SLBMs of the Pukkykson series so far fly only 2-2,5 thousand km, however, the underwater platform seriously increases the overall range of the entire complex.

How many missiles and warheads on them can be equipped with nuclear warheads is unknown. At the same time, the nuclear forces of the DPRK already have the ability to deliver such a load to targets on another continent. ICBMs of the latest models make it possible to attack targets almost throughout Europe and the United States. The effectiveness of such a strike depends on its quantitative indicators, the configuration of the combat load and the effectiveness of the potential enemy's missile defense system.

The DPRK, apparently, does not yet have the possibility of a massive strike capable of overloading the missile defense systems of third countries. However, nuclear weapons raise the stakes significantly: even one missed warhead will cause serious damage to infrastructure, inflict casualties on the population, and also hurt public sentiment. Accordingly, even in the current configuration, the DPRK's nuclear forces are capable of solving the tasks of strategic deterrence, albeit with some restrictions.

Official warning


Thus, to date, the DPRK has been able to create its own nuclear weapon and a range of delivery vehicles for it. The nuclear missile potential of the army is gradually growing - along with the ability to deter a potential enemy, and, if necessary, to strike back.

At the same time, at the current stage of development of the NAF, effective deterrence requires measures not only of a military-technical nature. The enemy must know and understand what awaits him in the event of aggression. It is for this purpose that the DPRK has not only passed a new law on nuclear force policy, but also publicly published it. Whether such a signal will be understood by its addressees in the person of third countries is unknown. But Pyongyang has made its position clear and has shown its readiness to continue its current policy.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    13 September 2022 05: 06
    Pyongyang has made its position clear
    Who needs to take note!
    1. -2
      13 September 2022 06: 50
      The point is not specified: the country's leaders have rusty eggs, have the courage to face danger and are ready to use yao.
      Considering the experience of the former USSR.
  2. +1
    13 September 2022 05: 21
    I'm just amazed at the talents and stubbornness of the North Koreans. Even Israel, in my opinion, surpassed in these indicators.
    1. 0
      13 September 2022 07: 28
      Of course, stubbornness is present. But if it weren’t for the help of the Chinese comrades, then perseverance and hard work without technology would not have led to such a breakthrough. Well, the Ukrainian trace, as far as I remember, is present. Otherwise, how to explain the increased range of ICBMs
      1. +3
        13 September 2022 08: 36
        The Chinese comrades constantly openly criticize the DPRK for developing its nuclear program and argue that the DPRK does not need to conduct nuclear tests and have nuclear weapons. Go to the Russian-language versions of the websites of the Xinhua agency and the Renmin Ribao newspaper and see for yourself. Moreover, the Chinese representatives are not shy in their expressions. There have been many problems in Sino-North Korean relations in recent decades. Back in the days of Mao and Kim Il Sung, the pro-Chinese grouping in the leadership of the DPRK and the WPK was defeated. However, they did the same. and with the pro-Soviet group. After the beginning of Deng's reforms in the PRC and the improvement of Sino-American relations, tensions also repeatedly arose in relations between the PRC and the DPRK.
  3. +5
    13 September 2022 05: 21
    Whether such a signal will be understood by its addressees in the person of third countries is unknown. But Pyongyang has made its position clear and has shown its readiness to continue its current policy.

    Kim Jong Un showed the world that woman The United States is not afraid of small (number of warheads), but sluggish (confrontation).
    Mr. VVP needs to reconsider Russia's attitude towards the DPRK and resume diplomatic, trade and military cooperation with a country friendly to Russia.
    You can learn to live on the planet in almost complete isolation.
    1. +1
      29 October 2022 16: 00
      backward country. They don't even have oligarchs to rob them.
  4. 0
    13 September 2022 05: 39
    Now the PRC has an Ally with a capital "C". Democrats take note...
    1. 0
      13 September 2022 08: 43
      The nuclear weapons of the DPRK were created, among other things, to reduce dependence on the PRC. The leadership of the PRC and the CPC has a negative attitude towards the nuclear status of the DPRK.
      1. -1
        13 September 2022 08: 54
        Quote: Sergej1972
        The CCP has a negative attitude towards the nuclear status of the DPRK.

        Maybe it did ... And now the picture before the PRC is very bleak - there are enemies all around, the economy is leaking, there is tremendous pressure on all "fronts" .. I won't be surprised if after some time friendly relations with the DPRK and its nuclear status will be touted as an achievement for the CCP.
        1. 0
          13 September 2022 09: 09
          And now it's negative. Too wayward ally of the PRC. In the Chinese media, the DPRK is called a friendly state rather than an ally. The People's Republic of China and the CCP believe, to be blunt, that such a small state as the DPRK is not qualified to have nuclear weapons.) And the leadership of the DPRK behaves too independently in relation to China. And in international affairs it behaves like a completely independent state. Naturally, the Chinese do not like this.
          1. 0
            13 September 2022 10: 03
            Quote: Sergej1972
            And in international affairs it behaves like a completely independent state. Naturally, the Chinese do not like this.

            Ah perishing now "not until fat." It seems that apart from this "wayward" (but friendly) PRC will not have anyone else, even in the long term. As a maximum, they are afraid of China, at least they are very wary, and this cannot be changed.
  5. 0
    13 September 2022 07: 26
    well done comrade Eun (the wise policy of Kim Il Sung has borne fruit) ... only nuclear weapons are the guarantee of the country's independence ... the rest is all paper (worse than toilet) and speeches in the style of blah blah blah
  6. 0
    13 September 2022 14: 40
    Various foreign sources report that the DPRK was able to establish the production of weapons-grade plutonium. Several tens of kilograms of this raw material are produced annually, which is enough to produce 10-12 ammunition with a capacity of tens of kilotons.

    We set up the production of highly enriched uranium. With plutonium, things are somewhat more complicated. There is only one small reactor in Yongbyon. A large amount of plutonium could only be produced during the testing of nuclear weapons.
  7. 0
    13 September 2022 19: 42
    That's who you need to be friends with - a stubborn and staunch ally, absolutely not inscribed in the capitalist world.
    At the same time, successes in the national economy, education, etc. North Korea has it.

    Some of the equipment could be bought from them and ours sold to them.
  8. 0
    11 November 2022 12: 25
    A very important article about a very important event! You won't find this anywhere else on this site!
  9. 0
    9 December 2022 09: 48
    Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula? RIP
    What can not but rejoice! good
    The more threats to potential partners, the less resources for our direction.