Armament bombers-rocket carriers Xian H-6

25
Armament bombers-rocket carriers Xian H-6
Bomber H-6A - one of the early modifications. Photo by Wikimedia Commons


Long-range bomber Xian H-6 entered service with the air force and naval aviation PLA in the early sixties and still remains in service. Such a long service life was obtained through regular upgrades and the creation of new modifications. In particular, as it developed, the bomber received one or another new weapon. Thanks to this, the modern H-6 fleet is able to use a wide range of missile weapons for various purposes.



In the process of development


The Chinese bomber H-6 of the first version was a licensed version of the Soviet Tu-16. He made his first flight in 1959, and in the early sixties entered service with the Air Force and Navy. In the first modification, it was a bomb carrier armed with conventional ammunition. Subsequently, a carrier of nuclear bombs, a tanker aircraft, etc. were created on its basis.

In the 6s, Chinese aircraft manufacturers began to develop new modifications of the H-XNUMX with missile weapons for striking ground and surface targets. This direction is still developing and has long been the main one. Various versions of the missile carriers were consistently developed, differing in the composition of the equipment, the list of compatible weapons, performance characteristics and combat capabilities.


Modern H-6K with six underwing pylons. Photo Chinamil.com.cn

Due to the obvious advantages, newer modifications of the H-6 with missile weapons gradually replaced conventional bombers. Currently, the Air Force and Navy of the PLA have only missile carriers of this family, built according to several modifications. Their use is provided by tanker aircraft, reconnaissance aircraft, jammers, etc. on the same air platform.

According to The Military Balance 2022, the PLA Air Force now has seven bomber regiments on H-6 aircraft of various modifications, and a new brigade is being formed and equipped. There are also training units with older bombers. Naval aviation has only two H-6 regiments.

The total number of H-6 aircraft may exceed 215-220 units. The most numerous are the H-6K modification aircraft - the Air Force serves approx. 100 units The Navy has 18-20 similar H-6Js adapted to fly over the sea. The Air Force remains approx. 60 older H-6Hs gradually upgraded to H-6M status. The Navy has up to 25-30 non-new H-6Gs, which will be replaced by "J" version aircraft in the future. For the Air Force, the newest H-6N is being built in a small series. In addition, 10-12 old H-6A bombers are used for training purposes.

For ground targets


H-6 bombers from the PLA Air Force and Navy are capable of hitting enemy ground targets. Their targets are fixed structures, troop concentrations, etc. Target coordinates can be known in advance or set in flight, incl. after dropping the weapon. To solve such problems, it is proposed to use mainly guided missiles of various types.


H-6K with a pair of CJ-10 or CJ-20 missiles (center) and two Hongniao products

According to known data, one of the main air-to-ground weapons for the H-6 are subsonic air-launched cruise missiles of the Hongniao series, which have been in service since the late nineties. It is known about the existence of three missiles of the family with different characteristics. All Hongniao missiles are equipped with a turbojet engine and are guided by satellite and inertial navigation. There are conventional and nuclear modifications. The very first rocket of the series, HN-1, had a range of up to 600 km, and for the HN-3 this parameter exceeded 1200-1500 km.

In the 10s, the deployment of more advanced subsonic CJ-6K ALCMs began. Such a weapon could be used by the latest modification of the H-1500K bomber and was supposed to deliver a conventional or nuclear warhead at a distance of up to 20 km. Later, the Changjian-2 missile appeared with a range of at least XNUMX km.

A few years ago, it became known that China was developing an aeroballistic modification of the Dongfeng-21 rocket. The range of such a product will reach 3 thousand km. They are planned to arm the aircraft of the latest modification H-6N.

To hit targets within a radius of tens of kilometers, H-6 aircraft can use guided bombs. The compatibility of such a bomber with the modern LT PGB family of bombs is reported. It includes several products with a caliber up to 1000 kg with semi-active laser guidance or satellite / inertial navigation.


A KD-88 anti-ship missile in front of a compatible coastal launcher. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

Depending on the modification, the H-6 missile bombers are capable of carrying several missiles or bombs. So, on the earlier H-6H, there were only two underwing points for large missiles or beam holders for bombs, and in modifications "K" and "M" their number was increased to 4-6. In the H-6N project, the design of the fuselage bottom and cargo compartment was redesigned, as a result of which the aircraft can carry a large DF-21 missile in a semi-submerged position.

Anti-ship weapons


A number of anti-ship missiles are intended to destroy mobile surface targets. All missile-carrying modifications of the H-6 can carry them. Accordingly, both the Air Force and the Navy can fight enemy ships. At the same time, due to the presence of various aircraft modifications in service, the capabilities of the two types of troops differ slightly.

One of the oldest anti-ship missiles in service is Yingji-63. This is a deeply modernized version of the older Shangyu product - the Chinese version of the Soviet P-15 anti-ship missiles. During the processing, the design was changed and new devices were introduced. Flight range increased to 200 km.


RCC YJ-12 on the underwing assembly. Photo by Globalsecurity.org

In the same period, the Kundi-88 anti-ship missile was developed and put into service. This is a supersonic missile with a ramjet engine and radar guidance. The flight range reached 200 km. The target was hit by a semi-armor-piercing warhead with a mass of 165 kg and a speed of about 3,5 Mach.

At the beginning of the tenth, it became known about the testing and / or development of anti-ship missiles of the Yingji-12 type. In technical terms, it is similar to the previous KD-88, but differs in increased size and weight, and also carries a heavier 500-kg warhead. When launched from an air platform, a flight range of up to 350-400 km is provided. The speed increased to 3,5-4 M.

During the development of the CJ-10 cruise missile, the YJ-100 product was created. This anti-ship missile has subsonic speed and flies 800 km. A 500-kg warhead is delivered to the target. The type of targeting is unknown. Probably, a combination of navigation systems and some kind of GOS is used.

In the context of creating an aeroballistic version of the DF-21 missile, there were reports of the possibility of a similar processing of anti-ship missiles of the DF-21D coastal complex. If work in this direction is really underway, their result can be officially shown in the foreseeable future.


Different payload options for the H-6K. From top to bottom: 4 YJ-63 missiles; 6 YJ-12 missiles; 6 ALCMs of type CJ-10/20; 6 products KD-88. Globalsecurity.org graphics

Like "land" bombers, H-6 naval aviation carry missiles only on an external sling. In terms of payload and weapon placement, they do not differ from H-6H/M/K aircraft. Depending on the assigned ammunition load, a missile carrier can take on board at least 4-6 missiles. Smaller items such as the KD-88 can be hung in pairs on the same pylon.

Armament and modernization


The Xian H-6 missile bomber is very old, and its design has long been obsolete. Despite all the upgrades and alterations, the introduction of new engines and equipment, such an aircraft can no longer be considered a modern and convenient platform. In terms of performance characteristics, it is inferior to foreign technology of its class, and operation and use face certain restrictions.

However, the PLA and the Chinese aviation industry continue to develop the H-6 aircraft family and get the best possible results. One of the ways of such development is the regular and timely modernization of the weapons complex and related systems. Almost constantly new devices and weapons are being created and introduced.

Apparently, the command of the PLA Air Force and Navy considers this approach correct and expedient, and also does not plan to abandon it. This means that H-6 bombers of current modifications will retain a wide range of guided missile and bomb weapons, and in the foreseeable future they will receive new generation products. As a result, the combat qualities of the obsolete bomber, despite all the objective limitations, will remain at an acceptable level.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    12 September 2022 05: 47
    I remember in 1967-1969, at our airfield in Zavitinsk, in addition to our VTA regiment, there was also a regiment * long-range * on the TU-16. I don’t remember exactly in what year they began to fly with rocket models under the planes. The missiles were very similar to the MIG-15. And somewhere in 1969, maybe in 1968, a pair of Tu-16s flew away with combat missiles launched in the ocean. When they arrived, they were greeted with an orchestra and congratulations!!! According to the words, the launches were made from 100 km on one side, and from 120 km on the second! Both missiles are right on the sea target! All this triumph of Soviet science and the Soviet Air Force is imprinted in my memory probably forever! good drinks
    1. +1
      12 September 2022 07: 50
      In the era of ultra-precise percussion means, the carrier has a secondary function. The Americans are already hanging anti-ship missiles on their UAVs.
      1. -4
        12 September 2022 15: 47
        ours are going to bombers of the new Tu-160M ​​construction
        to install a self-defense complex with Air-to-Air missiles - this is a real topic
        even if up to 16 missiles are delivered, a flight of 2 Tu-160Ms will be able to hit 32 targets
        if 4 AIM-120 missiles each, then this is up to 8 NATO fighters
        and if 2 Tu-160Ms cover 4 Su-35S fighters, then minus 16 fighters
        Swans flew past and destroyed 2 squadrons (-24)
      2. 0
        12 September 2022 19: 20
        Quote: Civil
        In the era of ultra-precise percussion means, the carrier has a secondary function. The Americans are already hanging anti-ship missiles on their UAVs.

        The Chinese have problems with target range. The question is probably in rocket engines.
        And what kind of engines do they have on their Xian H-6 now?
        1. +1
          12 September 2022 21: 25
          They wrote that the licensed version of the D-30.
    2. +8
      12 September 2022 10: 21
      The missiles were very similar to the MIG-15
      apparently "Comet"

      more from here - https://topwar.ru/164986-protivokorabelnaja-raketa-ks-1-kometa-pervaja-v-svoem-rode.html hi
      1. +3
        12 September 2022 11: 08
        Yes, yes, exactly like that! But no one told us the name, especially since I served in the VTA.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      14 September 2022 00: 34
      at the airfield in Zavitinsk, in addition to our VTA regiment, there was also a regiment of * long-range * on the TU-16. I don’t remember exactly in what year they began to fly with rocket models under the planes. The missiles were very similar to the MIG-15
      These are the first Soviet anti-ship missiles KS-1 "Kometa". Initially, during the testing period, Tu-4K aircraft were the carrier. Subsequently, as a carrier of "Komet", they created a modification of the Tu-16 - Tu-16KS. It was the Tu-16KS, with their standard weapons, that you saw ... KS-1 "Comet" for a long time (before being put into service) was tested in the Crimea. Moreover, the first prototypes were manned, for debugging the guidance system .... It is precisely such a prototype KS-1, with a pilot's cabin, that can be seen in those parts ... installed on a pedestal in the village of Kacha (Sevastopol), where I often visit. .. Here he is
  2. +4
    12 September 2022 10: 21
    This is what it means to create a successful glider and come up with the desired size of the aircraft ....
  3. +2
    12 September 2022 10: 57
    The author has noticeable growth because PMSM he copies the style of Sergey Linnik (Bongo). But there is room to grow smile
    And the car turned out to have good potential for modernization. It is curious that the heavy aircraft of the "transitional" (from piston to jet engines) period turned out to be long-lived - Tu-95, V-52.
    1. +2
      12 September 2022 15: 37
      yes, the Tu-95 is still a magnificent, highly reliable car, new reo and missiles and again around the corner
  4. +1
    12 September 2022 11: 01
    I remember that the Tu-16 had a problem with a flat corkscrew, I wonder if the Chinese decided?
    1. 0
      12 September 2022 12: 20
      And why even put such a car into a stall mode in a tailspin?
      1. +1
        12 September 2022 13: 23
        why did they fall? I'm not a pilot, I'm a technician
        1. 0
          12 September 2022 13: 34
          This is how planes with excellent performance characteristics also fall, and aerobatics is not needed for a bomber.
    2. 0
      12 September 2022 15: 40
      a novel, I think it’s unlikely that the aerodynamic design has remained the same, except that the mechanization of the wing has been increased, for the Tu-154 this is a disease at high angles of attack (I don’t know about 134)
      1. 0
        12 September 2022 16: 15
        Thank you! hi can electronics solve it? prohibitions on supercritical angles of attack?
        1. 0
          12 September 2022 16: 24
          It is possible, but there is always a chance to get MCAS like on the B-737-Max
        2. 0
          12 September 2022 16: 38
          a novel, there in these situations the electronics are blocked and His Majesty the human factor enters, as an example, the crew of the Tu-154 tried to overcome the storm front from above (fuel economy) an experienced crew, everything is a flat corkscrew, no one survives from 11000
  5. +1
    12 September 2022 18: 33
    Well done, the Chinese, not like us, in the 90s were ready to scrap EVERYTHING! Just a pat on the shoulder.
    Of course, we had the Tu-22M ... But today the Tu-16 with the suspension of the same Onyxes in the amount of 4-8 pieces could become a serious headache for the Navy. A pair of "carcasses" could fire a volley of 8-16 missiles from 300 km without entering the air defense zone. Unless an aircraft carrier with its carrier-based aircraft could intercept them before the missile launch line.
    1. +1
      13 September 2022 09: 49
      Quote: Tank DestroyerSU-100
      Of course, we had the Tu-22M ... But today the Tu-16 with the suspension of the same Onyxes in the amount of 4-8 pieces could become a serious headache for the Navy.

      To do this, the "sixteenth" had to survive the "army self-financing" of the nineties. And survive in your own Navy, for which MA was, is and will be an unloved stepdaughter. When the MPA was transferred to YES, then from a mighty paper naval missile-carrying managed to recruit live vehicles with crews for only a couple of squadrons.
  6. +1
    13 September 2022 00: 32
    "such an aircraft can no longer be considered a modern and convenient platform" - what does this mean?
    the aircraft is serial, that is, it is very convenient to operate
    the plane is being produced now, that is, it is NEW
    not to mention the fact that all the avionics on it are modern - they are cheaper than the old ones, so they have been updated a long time ago
    the platform is as convenient as the product of the weapon on the tactics of its use is effective
    I think that the number of these aircraft determines the quality of their application
    "the law of the transition of quantity into quality"
    so don't sneer at the Chinese
    I only think of one
    Russia will not be a target for these "outdated and inconvenient platforms"? and does Russia have a GUARANTEED countermeasure? Or is it enough just to keep quiet about it ...
  7. +2
    13 September 2022 11: 25
    Well, it's time to transfer the Tu-22M3 to China, let them develop, otherwise China will be banished from the ovs ...
  8. 0
    17 October 2022 11: 37
    Well done, the Chinese use Soviet equipment based on the Tu 16, An 12 and An 24 to the fullest. And we don’t produce anything as replacements for An 12 and An 24, there are enough brains to cut the budget. It was necessary with a sickle in the balls, a hammer in the temple for our effective managers.
    1. 0
      27 October 2022 04: 58
      The Chinese An12 remotorized, not to mention the avionics. There is only a glider from An12 left