Combat aircraft. The evolution of the attack fighter

64
Combat aircraft. The evolution of the attack fighter

I have already written about stories this aircraft, but decided to return. And it turned out to systematize some of the materials, and, to be completely honest, they were simply already tired of the same type of publications on the Internet on the topic of how we had few new fighters on 22.06.1941/1540/XNUMX (this is XNUMX pieces - not enough) and what indecency they were in compared with the German ones.

We will not talk about numbers, we will talk about other things. Namely - about the evolution of LaGG-3. And not from LaGG-3 to La-5, in fact, La-5 is a completely different aircraft, with a different engine, different aerodynamics, and so on. We will look at how the LaGG-3 was changed from series to series in accordance with the changing situation.



On June 22.06.1941, XNUMX, the Red Army Air Force had three models of new fighters at its disposal.


The MiG-3 was considered the highest and fastest, but the most poorly armed. The truth about this machine is very far from what they write about the MiG-3. Let's start with the fact that it was not built as a high-altitude fighter-interceptor, the MiG-1 aircraft was part of the same competition as the LaGG-1 and Yak-1. And therefore, by no means could a high-altitude interceptor enter the competition for a front-line fighter. It just happened, that's how the AM-35 engine showed itself.

And the armament of the MiG-3 was quite decent, 5 machine guns. 2 synchronous ShKASs in the nose, 12,7 mm BS through the propeller hub and 2 BK machine guns (also 12,7 mm) in the wings. Very decent. Why wing machine guns disappear from many authors is hard to say. Yes, there were cases (described by Pokryshkin) that wing BCs were removed at the beginning of the war. But in the beginning they were! And yes, difficult piloting and a bunch of other problems that loudly indicate that if the plane was brought to mind by Polikarpov, and not by Mikoyan, who actually stole the car, then the alignment could be different.


Yak-1, perhaps, is the weakest link in the trinity. Possessing good maneuverability, the aircraft was minimized as much as possible in all respects, including in terms of weapons. But the machine had the potential for modernization, which allowed it to fight through the entire war, although even the latest iteration of the aircraft, the Yak-3, had problems with the same range.


LaGG-3 was somewhat similar to colleagues. Problems with a weak engine, like the Yak-1, and difficult piloting, almost like the MiG-3.

And LaGG-3 at the beginning of the war was considered the most promising aircraft of the entire trio. And, unlike the MiG, which already in 1942 began to be shoved into the air defense regiments of cities, the LaGG-3 fought with all its heart.

In 1942, this machine was in service with 20 (!) Fighter regiments. It's a number, you know. Especially if we take into account the difficulties with the release of delta wood in the form of phenol resins exclusively imported.

So in 1941 he fought, in 1942 he fought in full, in 1943 he fought with tension, in 1944 ... he fought! Yes, in the calmest sectors of the front such as Karelia and the Arctic, but he fought! And, what is most interesting - in 1945 he also fought! With Japan! LaGG-3 took a direct part in the defeat of the Japanese Kwantung Army. Indeed, why not use aircraft with intact motor resources? Moreover, they were not used as fighters.

In total, 1940 LaGG-1944s were built from 6 to 528.


What does it say? That the plane was quite. Here the MiG-3 was “not a cake at all”, and they were released exactly half as many - 3. And there’s no need to talk about the Yak-178, the plane was so weak that modernization and improvements began almost immediately. And out of 1 thousand planes of the line (Yak-8, Yak-1u, Yak-1B, Yak-1M) "clean" Yak-1, 1 aircraft were produced.

Here are the numbers.

Now about the "deceived piano". Yes, the plane got such a nickname, but it was not even a LaGG-1, but a prototype I-301. Without weapons, licked and varnished, of course, the plane was both beautiful and fast. And he easily overcame the bar of 600 km / h, showing even 610 km / h in tests.


Of course, the production aircraft, which was assembled in the conditions of war, you yourself know with what qualified personnel, barely gave out 550 km / h. But for those who are interested, read the history of the Airacobra and why the British abandoned it. In short, everyone did it.

But we are not interested in the prototype, but in what went into the series. Paint instead of varnish, no grinding and polishing, weapons and everything else - a combat aircraft.

Series 1-3 (from December 1940)



The original LaGG-1 did not go into production. Only five of these machines managed to be assembled, and then the military intervened and demanded that Lavochkin install additional tanks in order to increase the flight range to 1000 km. Yakovlev, by the way, defended his car from such alteration, but Lavochkin could not. So the LaGG-3 with five tanks went into the series. Plus, unlike the LaGG-1, an armored back and a radio station were installed on the LaGG-3.

The MP-6 23 mm motor gun, which turned out to be very unsuccessful, was replaced with a proven 12,7 mm Berezin machine gun, which fired through the propeller hub. A couple more BSs (Berezin synchronous, 12,7 mm) were placed above the engine, and even higher above them - a pair of 7,62 mm ShKASs. For the ShKASs, two drop-shaped fairings had to be made in the cover of the weapons compartment, which are perfectly visible in the photographs of that time.

In general, it turned out to be a car with a rather terrible second salvo - 3,05 kg. For comparison: the Yak-1 gave out 1,86 kg / s, and the Bf.109E - 1,53 kg / s.

The car turned out to be chic in terms of filling, but the M-105P was frankly weak for her. Therefore, immediately after the start of the war, the fight against excess weight began.

Series 4-7 (from July 1941)



The struggle with weight resulted in the following manipulations: from the 4th series, the LaGG-3 lost the right synchronous Berezin heavy machine gun, and the 12,7-mm machine gun that fired through the propeller hub was replaced with a 20-mm ShVAK cannon.

This change had practically no effect on the power of the volley, as well as on the lightening of the car.

Series 8-11 (from August 1941)



The cannon, instead of two heavy machine guns, did not improve flight performance in any way, and therefore both ShKAS were removed from the LaGG-8 on the 3th series of aircraft.

As a result, the armament of the aircraft ceased to differ from the armament of the Yak-1B, that is, a 20-mm cannon and one 12,7-mm machine gun. This disarmament had almost no effect on the flight performance, but the second salvo noticeably decreased and the LaGG-3 became practically unsuitable for air combat. The weight of the aircraft has noticeably decreased (by almost 200 kg), but this has practically no effect on flight performance.

And here began a turn from a front-line fighter to a strike one. The People's Commissariat of the Air Force rightly considered that since an aircraft cannot work as an aircraft fighter, let it destroy armored vehicles and other targets.


To begin with, aircraft of the 8th series began to be equipped with six launchers for RS-82 rockets. Instead of ShVAK, they began to install a 23-mm VYa cannon on some of the test vehicles, the more powerful projectile of which was more suitable for destroying armored vehicles.

And in the 11th series, developing the transformation of the LaGG-3 into an attack aircraft, D3-40 bomb racks were installed on the aircraft, on which bombs weighing up to 50 kg could be hung. It was possible to hang incendiary aviation devices ZAP-6, containing 38 liters of fire mixture, or hanging tanks for 80 liters of gasoline. Some machines were equipped with RO-132 guides to launch more powerful 132-mm caliber rockets.


As part of another struggle with weight, two fuel tanks were removed, from which the alterations of LaGG-1 began.

What happened: despite lightening the car by another 100 kg, everything became even worse in terms of speed. Bomb locks and guides for the RS clung to the air, the engine did not become more powerful, and measurements taken in September 1941 showed that the speed had dropped to 503 km/h, and the rate of climb from 735 to 605 m/min. The range also suffered, and instead of 1100 km, the LaGG-3 could overcome only 760 km without external tanks.

However, if you do not go into such details, it can be stated that just by the end of 1941, the Red Army Air Force had a light universal strike aircraft.

Series 22-35 (from April 1942)



In 1942, the upgraded M-105PF engine with a capacity of 160 hp went into production. more than M-105P. The installation of this engine on the LaGG-3 gave the expected increase in speed to 556 km/h (almost 40 km/h), and the rate of climb increased to 781 m/min. Significant work has been carried out to improve the aerodynamics of the aircraft.

The aircraft began to install a new radio station RSI-4 "Malyutka".


We can say that the LaGG-3 “breathed”, since its performance characteristics became acceptable at the time the aircraft of the series was released.

Series 34-41 (from August 1942)



The second half of 1942 was marked by the construction of an anti-tank LaGG-3 armed with a 37 mm gun.

In general, the history of attempts to “make friends” with the LaGG-3 with a 37-mm gun is worthy of a separate saga. The first gun was the Sh-37 designed by Shpitalny. To place it in the nose of the aircraft, I had to work hard, but in the end the 38th series of 75 aircraft was released. Ammunition Sh-37 consisted of 21 rounds.

Combat tests were carried out in 42 and 188 IAP and showed that with the Sh-37, the LaGG-3 became a very formidable opponent for the German bombers, who could not hold the Sh-37 shells. Pilots of the 42nd IAP Colonel Shinkarenko reported on 45 enemy aircraft destroyed by 37-mm cannons.


Further, the Sh-37 cannon was replaced by the NS-37 designed by Nudelman and Suraev, lighter and with a large ammunition load. LaGG-3 thus opened the way for 37-mm guns in aviation, since after it these guns began to be installed on the Yak-9T and after the war on jet fighters of the first generations.

LaGG-3 with NS-37 was named "type 33". These aircraft massively took part in the battle for Stalingrad.


Simultaneously with the release of anti-tank versions, another attempt was made to return the LaGG-3 to fighter aircraft. The 35 series, which turned out to be quite large, was preceded by a lot of work, as a result of which the LaGG-3 was significantly improved.

The tail wheel was made retractable, automatic slats were installed on the wings, many changes were made to improve aerodynamics.

Alas, the LaGG-3 engine was still rather weak for such a machine, at the same time the Germans had new modifications of the same Messerschmitt, and the Soviet aircraft again began to lag behind in all flight characteristics. Indeed, a more powerful engine was needed, and as a result, Lavochkin installed it, but the history of La-5 is another story.

LaGG-3 continued to produce the Tbilisi aircraft factory. In 1943, the production of the 41st series began there. In fact, it was the same “type 35”, to which two ShKASs were returned. This did not bring the expected success, since the armor of German aircraft increased and 7,62-mm bullets no longer caused such damage as before.

Series 66 (May 1943 - June 1944)



Aircraft of the 66th series became the most advanced of all the LaGG-3 series. They were built from May 1943 to June 1944, after which the production of LaGG-3 finally ceased.

"Type 66" received a new cockpit canopy, like the La-5, with armored glass in the front and rear. Before that, conventional plexiglass was installed on all LaGG-3s.


It was possible to reduce the weight of the aircraft considerably due to the fact that it was possible to switch from delta wood to ordinary pine, which was much lighter, although less durable.

In terms of armament, the LaGG-3s again lost their ShKASs and the armament became the same: one 20-mm ShVAK cannon and one 12.7-mm BS machine gun. Strike weapons consisted of 6 RS-82 or RS-132 and 2 bombs up to 50 kilograms.

Aerodynamics again underwent changes, bomb racks, air intakes and radiator tunnels were “licked”. The speed increased to 590 km/h, the rate of climb to 893 m/min.


This LaGG-3, although it became the lightest and most advanced in terms of aerodynamics, nevertheless, it was still late in its perfection. La-5, Yak-7 and Yak-9 have already appeared, which left no chance for this aircraft. The production of the LaGG-3 was discontinued, and the aircraft began to disappear from the regiments.

They began to disappear - does not say that they disappeared completely. In reality, the aircraft fought on secondary sectors of the fronts until the very end of the war and even took part in the war with Japan.

What more can be said? You can simply imagine yourself as a pilot of the Red Army Air Force of the 1941 model. Yes, even in such a situation, when there is a choice of which aircraft to sit in the cockpit. Yak-1 or LaGG-3. It's worth sitting down and comparing.


There is Yak-1. Having no advantage over LaGG-3 in speed (LaGG was even faster in theory), significantly superior in rate of climb (by more than 100 m / min), lighter (2950 versus 3340 kg of take-off weight). The ceiling of the aircraft is about the same.

But there is a slight difference. Yak-1 does not have oxygen equipment, LaGG-3 has it. A conditional balloon that allows you to stay at an altitude of more than 5 meters for some time. Necessary? Necessary. Enemy planes can be dragged there in battle, which, by the way, happened. And there the Germans had an advantage, because they had complete order with high-altitude equipment.

Move on. Radio station. RSI-3 "Eagle". 12,3 kg of hope that you will be heard. She was in LaGG-3, the pilots Yakov and MiGs communicated by swinging their wings and other signs. Yes, The Eagle was a terrible radio station, especially compared to the American and British ones. But she was, and through the crackle of interference she helped the pilots communicate.

Another important point: range. The Yak-1 lost a lot, in general, the range is the weak point of Yakovlev's aircraft. 650 km against 1100 is serious.

Armament. ShVAK / 2 ShKAS in the Yak-1 against a battery of 3 BS 12,7 mm and 2 ShKAS - here LaGG clearly wins over explicit. The total weight of a volley is twice that of the Yak-1.

And the main advantage of the LaGG-3 over the Yak-1 and MiG-3: it was very difficult to set fire to and practically did not burn. A feature of expensive delta wood.

What aircraft will you fly into battle?


Let's look at those who went into battle on the LaGG-3 and did it successfully. Well, could there have been pilots who fought on a "guaranteed coffin"?


By the way, the “Lacquered Guaranteed Coffin” was invented by villains from history in the nineties. The pilots of the Great Patriotic War could not call the plane that, because in part it was painted with paint, and not varnished. And so the paint was the object of criticism throughout the war, because it worsened aerodynamics. And there was no varnish.

Seriously, LaGG-3 had its own nickname. "Taranka" or "Taranka with caviar". For its peculiar shape of the fuselage.

So what do we have in terms of successful "tarankovodov"? And they are.

Hero of the Soviet Union Lieutenant Colonel Galchenko Leonid Akimovich



410 sorties, 90 air battles, 24 personal victories + 12 group victories.

Galchenko fought in the north, near Murmansk, where air-to-air fighting was the norm. He could have shot down more, but the stroke put the pilot out of action. Galchenko finished the war as a deputy regiment commander. Galchenko shot down his last German aircraft in October 1944.

Hero of the Soviet Union, Colonel Igor Kaberov



476 sorties, 117 air battles. He personally shot down 10 enemy aircraft and 19 in the group.

Major Zaitsev Alexander Petrovich



206 sorties, 74 air battles. He personally shot down 14 aircraft and 21 in the group, of which on the LaGG-3 2 were shot down personally and 8 in the group.

Zaitsev became known as the winner of the famous German ace Otto Schashke, who destroyed 20 of our aircraft in a month and a half. Zaitsev died very absurdly, in a test flight on the P-39 Airacobra in May 1942.

Hero of the Russian Federation Colonel Tormakhov Dmitry Dmitrievich



366 sorties, 71 air battles. He shot down 14 enemy aircraft personally and 2 in the group. On LaGG-3 - 12 aircraft in person and 1 in the group. In addition, Tormakhov destroyed 2 aircraft at airfields as a result of ground attack. Disabled 2 steam locomotives, 20 railway cars, 18 cars, 8 wagons with goods. A typical example of using the LaGG-3 as an attack aircraft.

Twice presented to the title of Hero of the Soviet Union. The first time the award did not take place, because Tormakhov was shot down for more than a week, he went out to his own, the second time the performance was rejected due to the fact that the battle score grew very slowly.

Justice triumphed in 1996, when by decree of President Yeltsin Tormakhov was awarded the title of Hero of Russia. Not posthumously, which is especially pleasing. Dmitry Dmitrievich went on his last flight only in 2002.

Hero of the Soviet Union Major Grigoriev Gerasim Afanasyevich



He won his first victory in the sky over Minsk, was seriously wounded in both legs by anti-aircraft fire, after being healed he was transferred to the 178th IAP of Moscow Air Defense. In the skies of Moscow on the LaGG-3 he made more than 300 sorties, 18 air battles, shot down 11 aircraft personally and 2 in the group. The total score is 12 personal victories and 5 group victories. The bill could have been more, but after 1943 Grigoriev did not fly, his injuries affected him.

A small digression: "Uncle Yura" from the program "Good night, kids" is Yuri Gerasimovich Grigoriev, the son of a pilot. Interestingly, sometimes human roads develop.

Hero of the Soviet Union Captain Mironov Viktor Petrovich



356 sorties, 88 air battles. He shot down 10 enemy aircraft personally and 15 in the group.

He fought on the Karelian front, the permanent follower and friend of Leonid Galchenko. He died in February 1943 in a plane crash.

Hero of the Soviet Union Guard Major Kostylev Georgy Dmitrievich



For his military service, Georgy Kostylev flew several types of aircraft, but he received the title of Hero of the Soviet Union flying the LaGG-3. By April 1942, fighting as part of the 3rd GvIAP of the KBF Air Force, Kostylev made 233 sorties, conducted 59 air battles, shot down 9 aircraft personally and 34 as part of a group. With these data, he was presented for the title of Hero of the Soviet Union.

Twice Hero of the Soviet Union Captain Kamozin Pavel Mikhailovich



Another case when a pilot became a hero while fighting on the LaGG-3. Kamozin not only mastered the LaGG to perfection, he, as an instructor pilot, prepared more than four dozen pilots for battles on the LaGG-3.

From October 1942 to the end of March 1943, junior lieutenant Kamozin, acting as part of the 269 IAP on the LaGG-3, made 82 sorties to escort bombers, cover troops, reconnaissance and attack. In 23 air battles, he personally shot down 12 enemy aircraft. On May 1, Kamozin was awarded the title of Hero and the regiment went to master the Air Cobras, on which they fought no less effectively.

You can go on.

There were many pilots who started on the LaGG-3 or transferred to this aircraft at the beginning of the war. And their path was not finished in a “guaranteed coffin”, as pseudo-specialists from pseudo-history claim. On the contrary, many Germans, having met with our pilots on the LaGG-3, received the same coffin at the exit (at best).


If you look closely at the evolution of the aircraft, then it did not have the most disgusting thing: shying away in order to correct a frankly unsuccessful aircraft. There were attempts to improve its performance characteristics, moreover, the replacement of the motor had a very positive effect. But when it became clear that the LaGG-3, as a fighter, could not compete with the new German and Soviet vehicles, it turned out to be quite a decent light attack aircraft.

Of course, the LaGG-3 is not an IL-2, so the plane was not able to storm the front line of the enemy’s defenses. But a good range made it possible to process targets behind the front line. The anti-aircraft gun that the IL-2 destroyed is useful. The anti-aircraft installation, which was left without shells due to the fact that the LaGG-3 stormed the train, is about the same.

In those days, it was not a practice to simply take and send the plane to a landfill. They selected goals and objectives that were relatively feasible, depending on the performance characteristics. And everything that the designers and engineers did with the aircraft was aimed at maintaining efficiency in terms of combat use.


LaGG-3 was not a masterpiece, like some of his colleagues in the sky of that war. But also a frank freak too. A strong middle peasant who fought through the entire war, which not all fighters of that period could boast of at all.
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    13 September 2022 04: 44
    "Lacquered Guaranteed Coffin". I came across another name - Flying Guaranteed Coffin.

    By the way, the “Lacquered Guaranteed Coffin” was invented by scoundrels from history in the nineties

    The author is wrong. I heard this expression back in the 80s from a teacher, when I was still studying ...

    P.S. Thanks for the article. I read it with interest...
    1. +4
      13 September 2022 07: 31
      I join the kind word to the Author, a surprisingly well-crafted work. Even unexpectedly.
      According to the "names", I heard about the flying coffin from my grandfather. Although he remembered them with warmth and divided them into "cod" apparently LaGG and "hot" - IL-2.
      1. +1
        13 September 2022 09: 02
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        Even unexpectedly.

        That does not bring the author with emotions and the result is obvious!
        1. +3
          13 September 2022 09: 52
          That does not bring the author with emotions and the result is obvious!

          Yes, the author is decent. But why did he take the pseudonym "Roman Skomorokhov"? wink
          Before that, there was Peter Vlasov.
          https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5df249cdc31e4900b1b8683b/opredelitel-modifikacii-sovetskogo-istrebitelia-lagg3-62f875951df6b9749f080171
  2. +8
    13 September 2022 05: 32
    In the 90s, some of our smart people began to talk about LaGG-3 with exceptional contempt and deciphered its abbreviation as "Lacquered Guaranteed Coffin." Or as an option "Flying log". Any arguments? Why are they needed? Liberals utter exclusively and only indisputable truths! Their entire analysis boils down to comparing the horizontal flight speeds of fighters. Whoever is faster when flying at altitude is better. A purely American technique - otherwise how to prove that American aircraft are the most, the most in the world. The German ace Barghorn (he was credited with 302 victories) wrote that in the summer of 1942 near Stalingrad, the Bf.109F group led by him unsuccessfully tried to shoot down a single LaGG-3, the pilot of which, with skillful maneuvers, each time took his car out of the blow. After 40 minutes (!) of air combat, which gradually shifted to our territory, the Germans were forced to stop the pursuit. It is not known who this pilot was, it is only known that Kozhedub and Pokryshkin did not fly on the LaGG-3 and did not participate in the Battle of Stalingrad.
    In passing, I note that the Germans had a film of a photo machine gun that recorded the fact of shooting as proof of the downing of a Soviet aircraft. At the same time, none of the Germans cared about the fact that as a result of the recorded shooting, the Soviet aircraft could not have received even a scratch. So, for example, the holder of the Knight's Cross, Lieutenant Peter Duttmann of JG52, made 398 sorties on the eastern front, in which he was shot down 19 times. Those. he was shot down not by Pokryshkin or Kozhedub, but by every 20th Soviet pilot with whom he was not lucky enough to meet in the air. Nevertheless, Peter himself has 152 victories. His admirers claim that he has 42 more victories, not officially confirmed, including 9 downed aircraft in the battles over the Crimea during one day on 07.05.1944/3/XNUMX. Apparently Petruha rubbed his glasses with such self-forgetfulness that even Goebbels did not believe him. Therefore, it is not known once and by how many Germans that LaGG-XNUMX, repeatedly fired at Stalingrad, was counted in the number of personal “victories”.
    Beginning in 1941, the Eastern Front ruthlessly crushed the best forces of the Luftwaffe. This can be confirmed by the following fact. November 17, 1941, i.e. long before the onset of frost, which Western historians are so fond of referring to, Colonel-General Ernst Udet, Assistant Secretary of State for Aviation and Inspector General of the Luftwaffe for the aviation industry and rear, shot himself. The former commander of the Luftwaffe fighter aviation, Adolf Holland, wrote about the reason for this suicide:
    The last time we saw each other, I hardly recognized him: his spontaneous love of life, carefree humor and friendly cordiality - all this has disappeared somewhere. He was in a state of deep depression. The very course of the war told him more and more that the Luftwaffe was on the wrong track.
    Fighters, fighters and more fighters - that's what you need! Thousands and thousands
    he often repeated. Despite this, the number of fighters produced by the German aircraft industry, which was under his supervision, was not even enough to compensate for our losses that we suffered on the Eastern Front, where there was no question of maintaining or restoring air superiority in the West. He understood very well what threatened us, and said that The Eastern Front became the "Verdun of the Air Force". In the end, he got lost in the political maze of the German top leadership and succumbed under the burden placed on him ...

    The German aircraft designer Heinkel wrote about this event as follows:
    ... Udet in his bedroom put a bullet in his head, everything was completely clear. Blitzkrieg against Russia failed. The Luftwaffe, thrown to the east, were exhausted and scattered across the Russian steppes. Their backbone was broken, there was not the slightest chance to return the planes to the Western Front ...

    Comments needed?
    1. Alf
      0
      13 September 2022 20: 16
      Quote: Old electrician
      Who was this pilot is unknown,

      Kind of like Grinchik.
    2. 0
      20 October 2022 16: 55
      There is a wonderful book with which the debunking of the myths about the Luftwaffe began .. Yu.I. Mukhin "Assy and propaganda." it was a long time ago .. but there everything is laid out on the shelves and about their inflated bills and so on ..
  3. +7
    13 September 2022 05: 39
    You can simply imagine yourself as a pilot of the Red Army Air Force of the 1941 model. Yes, even in such a situation, when there is a choice of which aircraft to sit in the cockpit. Yak-1 or LaGG-3. It's worth sitting down and comparing.
    Such a choice - only if in War Thunder. In reality, in 1941, they flew on what they ordered, but they ordered to fly on what was. Those pilots of the Red Army Air Force knew the performance characteristics of the Bf.109 better than us, sinners, and perfectly understood how and in what the advantages of the 109th manifest themselves in battle, and nevertheless they took to the air and performed tasks, often paying the highest price for this. And there was no chance, when they knocked down, swear, drink coffee or something stronger, whatever you like, and pledge again.
  4. +6
    13 September 2022 06: 40
    "The accident rate will be great, because you make us fly on coffins!" Everyone who was interested in the history of aviation knows this phrase of Rychagov, but what could ordinary pilots say?
    For example, almost half of the losses of the IL-2 were non-combat, most of them due to the fault of the pilots, from lack of skill, or even on purpose, there were such cases, they ended in penal battalions. A lot of pilots fought without success in their service, they were first of all demobilized, and they began to spread rumors about what bad planes they fought in justification. So about LaGG, probably, the name "flying guaranteed coffin" appeared earlier. And real pilots shot down Messerschmites on the I-16.
    1. 0
      14 September 2022 01: 36
      Rychagov was appointed to the post in order to fix this, but what he blurted out was without thinking. Flying is one thing, you and the Hero can be there! And flying others is worth a lot. Didn't work well in general.
    2. +1
      14 September 2022 11: 28
      Quote: Konnick
      For example, almost half of the losses of the IL-2 were non-combat, most of them due to the fault of the pilots, from lack of skill, or even on purpose, there were such cases, they ended in penal battalions.

      Non-combat losses in the Red Army Air Force is a very crafty graph. For it is very fond of collecting aircraft decommissioned for all reasons, except for combat losses. For example, in terms of wear and tear and obsolescence.
    3. 0
      20 October 2022 16: 59
      You are somehow dismissive about the I-16, but apparently you don’t know that this is a new word in the very concept of maneuverability .. it was statically NEUTRAL. The command suggested resuming its release in 1943 because he was good at "Walking for gas" (c) and even type 5 had better throttle response than other fighters .. only the Yak-3 caught up with him, learn the mat part ..
      1. 0
        20 October 2022 17: 22
        learn the mat part..

        I know about Bulganin and Khudyakov's letter. Biplane Chaika was better than IL-2. And I have no disregard for the I-16. These I-16 and I-153 aircraft, I am sure, would show themselves in the NWO no worse than the vaunted Ka-52 and Mi-28. Possessing smaller dimensions and thermal radiation, they could make a rustle.
  5. +2
    13 September 2022 07: 44
    And yes, difficult piloting and a bunch of other problems that loudly indicate that if the plane was brought to mind by Polikarpov, and not by Mikoyan, who actually stole the car, then the alignment could be different.

    Off topic, of course, but it seems like I16 was brought up by Polikarpov himself? Here is what Mark Lazarevich Gallay writes about this aircraft:
    “But how many people who did not have such talents (or, which is quite a shame, did not yet possess them) died, falling for one of the notorious “strictness” of an exorbitantly capricious machine!
    Not! The plane should not require the same attention and physical fitness from the person who controls it, as, say, the work of a circus acrobat or juggler. And the point here is not only in the comparative "mass character" of the flying profession in comparison with the circus one, but, above all, in the fact that for a pilot, piloting an aircraft is not an end in itself. The greater part of his attention must be freed up for the conscious exercise of other functions for which, in essence, the flight is undertaken.
    Already tired of the praises addressed to Polikarpov!
    According to LaGG. Both he and the Yak were built under the M106. Yes, with an engine a third less powerful than planned, the plane did not show what it was supposed to show.
    1. +4
      13 September 2022 09: 13
      Off topic, of course, but it seems like I16 was brought up by Polikarpov himself?


      Already tired of the praises addressed to Polikarpov!


      And in whose address should the praises be? Yakovlev? Ilyushin? Everyone had heaps of complaints.


      Not! The plane should not require the same attention and physical fitness from the person who controls it, as, say, the work of a circus acrobat or juggler.

      These words of Gallai about the uselessness of the physical training of the pilot are very controversial. Not every healthy person can become a pilot; they still need an excellent vestibular apparatus.
      Therefore, the pilots who mastered the I-!6 showed themselves to be real aces, and even reseeding the Airacobras, and those who mastered the I-16 could fly on them, became the most productive fighter pilots ..
      1. -2
        13 September 2022 09: 57
        You are taking words out of context. Gallai wrote about the excessive severity of Polikarpov's aircraft control. The same age as I16, Bf109, somehow managed without such difficulties.
        1. +3
          13 September 2022 10: 57
          The same age as I16, Bf109, somehow managed without such difficulties.

          Didn't manage.
          Look at the statistics on Bf109 losses, how inexperienced and experienced German pilots tumbled. Somewhere we find, somewhere we lose ... The Germans lost the good ones, we lost the bad ones.

          “It was a very maneuverable aircraft and, moreover, easy to fly. It picked up speed very quickly, especially if you dived a little before that. take-off was a problem.The plane had a very powerful engine and a narrow landing gear.If you take off the ground too early, the car could turn ninety degrees. Because of such unsuccessful takeoffs, we have lost a lot of good pilots.". (E. Hartmann)


          “The narrow chassis of the 109 made it very sensitive to crosswinds and poor ground when landing. We had incredibly large losses of equipment and injuries of pilots for this reason. (Heinz Lange)

          "Hauptmann Heinz Knoke recalled that when he studied at the 1st Fighter Aviation School, when mastering the Bf 109, one or two crashes occurred every week during takeoff and landing, which ended in the death of cadets."
          1. +2
            13 September 2022 19: 12
            The landing gear was the Achilles' heel of the 109, but it was easy to fly, as our test pilots confirmed when they tried this aircraft.
        2. Alf
          +5
          13 September 2022 20: 19
          Quote: Grossvater
          Gallai wrote about the excessive severity of Polikarpov's aircraft control.

          Yes, but Polikarpov has nothing to do with it. He built the plane that the military wanted, to recall the then fashionable concept of an unstable aircraft?
          1. 0
            14 September 2022 05: 17
            Quote: Alf
            recall the then fashionable concept of an unstable aircraft?

            Why only then? All Soviet aircraft of generation 4 and above are deliberately made unstable in order to achieve the super-maneuverability characteristic of this generation. Someone would try to make, well, at least "Pugachev's Cobra" on a quite stable MIG-21.
        3. 0
          20 October 2022 17: 02
          There was not strictness there, but something else .. which I already wrote about .. this is exactly what Chkalov liked.
    2. +4
      13 September 2022 21: 04
      Already tired of the praises addressed to Polikarpov!


      This is an old method of opposition used by unscrupulous people acting as experts, historians, etc. It consists in looking for a counter-figure, which is endowed with those qualities that they want to belittle in another figure. Examples: Yakovlev - Polikarpov, Zhukov - Rokossovsky, etc. One of the favorite tricks of Rezun, Corned beef and others like them. And according to the article, I’ll say this, very unprofessional, in many ways the author contradicts himself, for example:
      Another important point: range. The Yak-1 lost a lot, in general, the range is the weak point of Yakovlev's aircraft. 650 km against 1100 is serious.

      Those. focused on the Yak, but what about the more or less flying best LaGG-3-66? And just like that, the same 650 km of practical range, # but this is different! In general, analyzing the alogisms and blunders of this article, the far-fetched conclusions, one can probably write three articles.
  6. +1
    13 September 2022 08: 10
    In skillful hands and ch.r.e.n a balalaika, but in inept ones ... but it’s better when the weapon is initially no worse than that of the enemy, and even better when it surpasses. But what was it was.
  7. +5
    13 September 2022 08: 17
    12,7mm BS through screw hub

    What?!!!!! The AM-35 engine did not at all provide for the placement of weapons in the collapse of the cylinders, Mikulin's attempts to do this were either, but unsuccessfully; either just voiced.
    1. +1
      13 September 2022 10: 21
      Quote: doktorkurgan
      The AM-35 engine did not provide for the placement of weapons in the collapse of the cylinders at all

      And what about the AM-35?
      The car turned out to be chic in terms of filling, but M-105P was frankly weak for her.
      1. IVZ
        +3
        13 September 2022 11: 14
        Here the M-105 really has nothing to do with it. MiGs were equipped with AM., which played a fatal role in their fate - the Il-2 was equipped with modifications of these engines. And the BS was synchronous there.
        1. 0
          13 September 2022 11: 42
          12,7mm BS through screw hub

          In general, it sounds like an oxymoron (BS - Berezina synchronous, why put it in the screw hub). My "comment" refers to LaGG, the author "jumped" from MiG to LaGG, that I got confused.
          1. IVZ
            0
            13 September 2022 13: 31
            It happens. Himself like that.
  8. +2
    13 September 2022 08: 23
    And about the piano, Shavrov has a mention of this nickname of a pre-war copy "and a prototype dark cherry color was polished to a shine, for which it was called "piano" or "radiola".
  9. +1
    13 September 2022 09: 47
    Tail emblem on the aircraft LAGG 3 Leonid Akimovich Galchenko.
    1. +3
      13 September 2022 09: 56
      L.A Galchenko, this is also a person - a steamer. In honor of him, the RTMSk of the Moodzund MA 1821 type, then M 0008 was named. Galchenko.
  10. +4
    13 September 2022 10: 04
    What's the new term, fighter-attack aircraft? In general, this has never happened, at least I have not come across such terminology in my studies and practice.
    The LaGG-3 itself is still a fighter, which, due to its performance characteristics, was more suitable for the tactics of fighter-bombers, which began to be widely used during WWII. The Germans were more successful in this matter, since they completely failed the SHA, but ours did not stand still in the IBA. By the way, during the war, instead of the IBA, they used the term strike fighter.
    As for the lethargy of its flight characteristics, if we look at the LaGG-3 66 series, then yes, it doesn’t shine for 1943.
    Maximum speed km / h
    off the ground xnumx
    at height 591
    Practical range, km 650
    Maximum rate of climb, m / min 893
    Practical ceiling, m 9800

    But only the P-39Q Airacobra, arriving in the USSR, was almost the same age (a year older) as they did not shine either and, in aggregate, was inferior to the Soviet aircraft.
    Maximum speed km / h
    off the ground xnumx
    at height 605
    Practical range, km 845
    Rate of climb, m / min 762
    Practical ceiling, m 10620

    Yes, the American car had an advantage of 14 km / h of maximum speed at altitude, but it was still necessary to climb there, and with the rate of climb, the "cobra" had sadness, however, the power-to-weight ratio.
    (LaGG-3 does not shine either).
    Nevertheless, this does not prevent the current Internet experts from scolding the LaGG-3 in every way and extolling the Airacobra. And after all, they didn’t come up with everything themselves, there are references to the memories of veterans.
    The thing is, there is one rule, two mediocre planes are better than one good one.
    And the LaGG-3 had to be fought in the initial period of the war, often fighting less against more advanced German vehicles. And under these conditions, every kilometer of horizontal speed, every meter of vertical speed is worth its weight in gold. Hence the annoyance of the pilots.
    "Aircobra" began to arrive when this crisis had already passed, because the shortcomings of it were no longer so noticeable.
    1. +2
      13 September 2022 10: 51
      Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
      What's the new term, fighter-attack aircraft?

      Fighter-bomber. In the current classification...
    2. +1
      13 September 2022 11: 07
      What's the new term, fighter-attack aircraft? In general, this has never happened, at least I have not come across such terminology in my studies and practice.

      Usually this term is massively used in relation to the I-15
      1. +2
        13 September 2022 12: 30
        Two at once. Then there was the term strike fighter. And the fighters that were transferred to the assault regiments were later called attack aircraft.
  11. +1
    13 September 2022 10: 24
    All Soviet aircraft of that period (for objective reasons) were far behind the level (and indeed ...) achieved abroad, so the pilots who had to go into battle on them had every moral right to bonfire them. This is a psychological technique that gives relaxation. They say that in some Japanese firms there are rubber dolls depicting bosses. Grassroots workers can beat these dummies with a bamboo stick lying nearby. They say it helps.
    By the way, it’s not just that the “techies” came up with a saying (it concerned the Su-7, -9): “Designer Sukhoi. The plane is “raw.” And the technician is “wet.” They say that Pavel Osipovich, who was told this, cried. That is why in subsequent At the design stage, measures were taken to improve manufacturability, in particular, the equipment was grouped according to the types of preparation, accessibility was improved, markings were applied to the hatches.
    1. +2
      13 September 2022 19: 27
      All Soviet aircraft of that period (for objective reasons) were far behind the level (and ...) achieved abroad.

      Well, there were objective reasons for this, aviation itself appeared in the country not so long ago, and the industry as a whole, well, I wouldn’t say that aviation was directly inferior, France, for example, also had that circus of freaks, Hurricane the British one was also archaic, and there weren’t really Spitfires at all for the initial period of the war, the Italians ran into engines and didn’t say that, as a result, they were serious opponents, and they also built fighters per hour for a teaspoon. The Germans had the 109th and it was the best for the initial period of the war. So the Soviet Union managed to reach a competitive level, literally in 20 years, having created an industry from scratch for the needs of aviation, one can say that I’m not sure that anyone in the world would have done better in such conditions.
    2. +1
      14 September 2022 11: 42
      Quote: iouris
      All Soviet aircraft of that period (for objective reasons) lagged far behind the level (and ...) achieved abroad,

      There are three main reasons: aluminum, motors and gasoline.
      The shortage of aluminum was such that before the war they wanted to buy it from Germany.
      Motors. Well, this saga is known to everyone. Here you are, comrade designers, M-105 - and do not deny yourself anything. Here is an M-88 for you... but no, stop, give it back - the motor is not working. Here's an AM-35 for you ... but no, stop, there won't be one - AM-38 is more needed. Here's the M-82 for you ... however, until 1943 it constantly breaks down and eats candles like crazy, but for now you design cars for it. And here you have a cloud of paper engines that someday may go into series. In fact, just as we started the war with the M-105, we ended up with it. Unless in the middle of the war, the M-82 was added.
      And finally, gasoline. The maximum possible is B-78. But it is practically non-existent.
      ...NPO's application for high-octane aviation gasolines was 78 thousand tons according to B-2.656, 74 thousand tons according to B-985.189, aviation gasoline B-70-600 thousand tons, other aviation gasolines - 284 thousand tons, motor gasoline - 4.735 thousand tons, diesel fuel - 1.629 thousand tons.
      The mobilization plan of the national economy for the 1941 war year provided for the supply of NPOs to 174,5 thousand tons of B-78 aviation gasoline. In the presence of 56,9 thousand tons of this type of gasoline in the untouchable reserves of NPOs, the security of annual demand was less than 22,5%. For other types of gasolines, the need for NPOs was planned to meet (taking into account the use of cash emergency reserves) for B-74 by 28,6%, for B-70 and RB-70 - by 98,8%. But the B-70 and RB-70 were used mainly on outdated types of aircraft, and the main share of the needs for them fell on training units and refresher courses.
      © Melia
      Like this. 22,5% of the application according to peacetime norms - and this is only according to the plan. In fact, it's even more fun.
      As a rule, every year, comrade People’s Commissar, at the very height of flights in the summer, starting from the month of July, and sometimes from the month of June, the supply of gas stops, parts switch to hungry rations, making flights to the better months because of this for flights (June, July, August). This situation is further intolerable. You won’t learn to fly without gas. The normal supply of gasoline begins again from the month of October, when in fact flights according to weather conditions are beginning to curl up, and airfields are getting wet.
      © Novikov A.A., Major General of Aviation, Air Force Commander of the Leningrad Military District. Materials of the meeting of senior management of the Red Army December 23-31, 1940
  12. 0
    13 September 2022 11: 07
    LaGG-3 was produced until 1944 only because there was not enough aluminum.
    Already in 1943, he did not correspond in terms of performance characteristics to the rank of a fighter.
    Well, find fault with the Yak-1, that's what it is. In 1942, they already went into the Yak-1B and Yak-9 series, whose legs grow just from the Yak-1. Naturally, the production of the Yak-1 was turned off.

    A fighter is primarily an energy converter. Engine power is converted into either altitude, or speed, or horizontal maneuver. LaGG-3 accelerated slowly, climbed poorly, did not shine with horizontal maneuver. The fact that Kaberov and Kostylev fought and defeated on it is not the merit of the aircraft, it is the skill of the pilots.
    1. +2
      13 September 2022 11: 22
      What is the relationship between aluminum and LaGG-3.
      If La-5 and La-7 with the same fuselage were produced until the end of the war.
      1. 0
        13 September 2022 11: 33
        Straight. At the beginning of the war there was a shortage of volatile metal. A little more aluminum, and the Yak-1 became the Yak-3. La-5 became La-7. The same I-180 was not allowed into the series, not because Yakovlev was bad, but because a lot of aluminum was needed for its production.

        Plus the lack of an in-line engine of suitable power. They couldn’t lighten the car, and when extra aluminum appeared, there was already a two-row star on LaGG, and no one bothered with the dubious results of replacing wood with metal. The improvement of La-5 was more promising.
        1. -1
          13 September 2022 11: 46
          Did you read it in the documents?
          By the way, do you know which plant produced LaGGi in 1943,1944?
          1. -1
            13 September 2022 12: 06
            Fomenko subtracted. And I regularly see it on Ren TV.
            The Tbilisi plant produced them, which I see no point in doing. At the end of 1943 and in 1944, the USSR did not have a shortage of aircraft.
            1. -1
              13 September 2022 12: 08
              As soon as the Tbilisi plant was re-profiled for the production of yaks, the production was completed.
              Aluminum has nothing to do with it.
  13. +7
    13 September 2022 11: 31
    Why wing machine guns disappear from many authors is hard to say.

    Because they have been discontinued. Moreover, they began to be removed from already produced cars. And the reason is simple:
    ... the production of BK machine guns was insufficient, Plant No. 1 often did not receive the necessary machine guns and could not complete aircraft.
    9 War in the air. No. 115.
    So it was necessary to disarm the already released five-point machines in order to produce new three-point ones.
    What does it say? That the plane was quite. Here the MiG-3 was “not a cake at all”, and they were released exactly half as many - 3.

    Yes Yes. And the fact that the AM-35 was gobbled up by the AM-38 is so, trifles. smile
  14. +3
    13 September 2022 12: 31
    Funny article....
  15. +1
    13 September 2022 13: 03
    Most MiG-3s were fired with 3 machine guns, not 5
  16. -2
    13 September 2022 13: 09
    There are no bad weapons, there are misuses. Even now, WWII aircraft could come in handy. I wish there were a thousand LAGG3s near Kharkov, capable of chasing small targets, cheaply and efficiently.
    1. +1
      14 September 2022 11: 49
      Quote: Victor Sergeev
      I wish there were a thousand LAGG3s near Kharkov, capable of chasing small targets, cheaply and efficiently.

      Food for military air defense. However, not even for air defense, but for ordinary motorized riflemen.
      In WWII, an anti-aircraft gun is the level of a regiment or division. And now in every MSO there is a 30-mm gun or a 14,5-mm KKP. Plus a cloud of KKP on technology. And all this is against a propeller-driven aircraft with its speeds.
      So the plane of the Second World War will live a maximum of up to the first approach to the target.
  17. +7
    13 September 2022 14: 06
    To be frank, the article is "nothing", a blunder on a blunder drives a blunder, especially for me as an aviation engineer, bench modeler, and WWII aviation lover. Informativeness is at least, in general, after the author declared - in fact, La-5 - "this is a completely different aircraft, with a different engine, different aerodynamics, and so on" - I thought about quitting reading, but decided to eat the cactus to the end.
    There are a lot of mistakes that only the statement about Berezin firing on the MiG-3 through the propeller hub is worth, when the clue was in the very name of the BS machine gun - Berezin synchronous. The same statement about La-5 and LaGG, the history of the emergence of La-5 is well known, described in great detail in the article -
    The birth of La-5 or the development and refinement of the M-82 engine during the Second World War. Gennady Serov
    Maybe the La-5 had a different wing, no, the same thing, they even tried to make the engine cowling so that they would keep the serial LaGG fuselage. There is no mention of a serious (main) change on the LaGG, in the 23rd series, an increase in the area of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbthe horizontal tail and a change in the installation site, where the main disease was finally corrected - unpredictable stalling into a tailspin when losing speed.
    Who is interested in reading serious sources like - "LaGG-3. Fighter, attack aircraft, reconnaissance aircraft" Author: Degtev Dmitry Mikhailovich
    1. +1
      14 September 2022 11: 53
      Quote: irontom
      Maybe the La-5 had a different wing, no, the same thing, they even tried to make the engine cowling so that they would keep the serial LaGG fuselage.

      EMNIP, La-5 with a "double hull" in the bow: a set from LaGG-3 and light skin to bring the new "forehead" to the old fuselage, was produced for almost half a year. This was explained by the impossibility of stopping production to change the design of the set and the lack of experienced personnel for the manufacture of new equipment for a new bow.
  18. +1
    13 September 2022 14: 46
    This LaGG-3, although it became the lightest and most advanced in terms of aerodynamics, nevertheless, it was still late in its perfection. La-5, Yak-7 and Yak-9 have already appeared, which left no chance for this aircraft. The production of the LaGG-3 was discontinued, and the aircraft began to disappear from the regiments.


    Didn't La-5 appear after the LaGG-3 was discontinued?
    There was both paint and varnish ... varnish was needed to protect the airframe from precipitation. Dampness for veneer (plywood, if you like) is undesirable.
    The Yak was the most advanced in terms of aerodynamics, and therefore had such a modernization resource. Range - was not such a significant indicator. What was the range of La-5FN? Also not very big, but the plane fought quite successfully.
  19. +1
    13 September 2022 14: 58
    Quote: Grossvater
    Already tired of the praises addressed to Polikarpov!


    Polikarpov is not to blame. He was required to create a super-maneuverable (short turn time in the horizontal plane) fighter. He created this, having played around with centering. It is easier to maneuver than to fly in a straight line. But to manage this one is very difficult, the slightest mistake - and a corkscrew with a landing below ground level.
    It is not the designers who should be blamed, but those who give them not always correct TTTs (tactical and technical requirements), based on the erroneous concept of air combat tactics.
    Develop the correct principles of tactics, more accurately prioritize the parameters of military equipment samples - then you will get an aircraft with good performance characteristics, otherwise ... steer what you got with "flying coffins" ... it's your own fault.
  20. 0
    13 September 2022 15: 43
    Quote: Luminman
    I heard this expression back in the 80s.

    So-and-so ... that in the 80s ...
  21. +2
    13 September 2022 19: 47
    Quote: Nagan
    You can simply imagine yourself as a pilot of the Red Army Air Force of the 1941 model. Yes, even in such a situation, when there is a choice of which aircraft to sit in the cockpit. Yak-1 or LaGG-3. It's worth sitting down and comparing.
    Such a choice - only if in War Thunder. In reality, in 1941, they flew on what they ordered, but they ordered to fly on what was. Those pilots of the Red Army Air Force knew the performance characteristics of the Bf.109 better than us, sinners, and perfectly understood how and in what the advantages of the 109th manifest themselves in battle, and nevertheless they took to the air and performed tasks, often paying the highest price for this. And there was no chance, when they knocked down, swear, drink coffee or something stronger, whatever you like, and pledge again.

    Firstly, at least until Stalingrad, we did not have the practice of "free hunting". Only then a regiment of aces was specially created to counteract the German specialists. And it immediately gave results.
    And the high losses in hawks at the beginning of the Second World War were also the result of the outdated organization of links - in triplets ... After switching to pairs, the effectiveness of interaction jumped by an order of magnitude.
  22. 0
    13 September 2022 23: 58
    Yakovlev, by the way, defended his car from such alteration, but Lavochkin could not.

    Yakovlev, for a moment, was the deputy people's commissar of the aircraft industry for new technology. MiG also loaded extra. tanks and Mikoyan (even with the support of his brother, a member of the Politburo of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks) could not do anything.
    Yak add. tanks would lead to the fact that it would be removed from service and production.
    In general, Yakovlev did a lot of harm to aviation at the post of deputy. people's commissar.
  23. 0
    14 September 2022 07: 21
    Great article! Five points!
    Indeed, the LAGG is quite a good aircraft, and even a Soviet fighter with the most powerful weapons in the initial period of the war.
    And in general, the right decisions were laid in it, since Lavochkin managed to turn a good one into an excellent aircraft, simply by changing the engine. The fuselage and wing on the first La-5s remained "Lagg" and this was quite enough for him during that period of the war.
    1. 0
      20 October 2022 16: 38
      Of course, the I-185 is better ... but what is, is.
  24. 0
    20 October 2022 16: 37
    Cannon Nudelman-Suranov NS-37 ... and not "NS-37 designed by Nudelman and Suraev" .. correct if possible ..
  25. Eug
    0
    21 October 2022 18: 21
    The article is excellent, without unnecessary emotions and "balanced" in real + and -. But there is a drop of tar - the NS-37 cannon - the "brainchild" of the designers Nudelman and SuraNOv, and not SuraEva, as in the article. Need to fix...
  26. PPD
    0
    22 October 2022 08: 05
    Migu- the engine passed the verdict.
    And to be proud of Lagg (namely Lagg, not la 5), ​​which, for no one knows why, continued to rivet even at 44?!!! request
    Yes, some conclusions to draw from this ...
  27. 0
    26 October 2022 13: 09
    Conclusion: everything rested on the motor. And now it stumbles. True, problems with electronic filling, automation and algorithms have been added, the share of which in the cost of an aircraft has long exceeded 70%. And some are all: "super-maneuverability", "super-maneuverability" ... Where did she help and to whom?
  28. 0
    5 November 2022 11: 59
    Good article . Truth always wins.
  29. 0
    7 December 2022 01: 00
    The article is sometimes controversial, sometimes not accurate, but curious in essence. Fighter-bombers were popular with the Allies, but we perceived them as forced. Although no one undertook to objectively compare the effectiveness of information security and an attack aircraft.