Nuclear warheads in domestic air defense and missile defense

34
Nuclear warheads in domestic air defense and missile defense
The V-30 missile from the S-25 air defense system. Photo Vitalykuzmin.net


The vast majority of air and missile defense systems use missiles with high-explosive fragmentation warheads. Separate complexes of this kind received missiles with nuclear warheads, which made it possible to solve particularly complex tasks. Several similar systems were created in our country, and for a long time they provided protection for important facilities.



Nuclear benefits


A nuclear charge has obvious advantages over high-explosive fragmentation warheads. With the same mass and dimensions, it is hundreds or thousands of times more powerful. This gives a significant increase in the radius of destruction, and also compensates for a possible miss. In addition, the goal is affected by several different factors at once.

All these advantages of a nuclear warhead can be used in the context of air defense and missile defense. So, high power and a significant radius of destruction allows you to hit large group targets and at the same time reduces the requirements for pointing accuracy. The presence of several damaging factors additionally increases the radius of influence on an air target: if it is not destroyed by a shock wave, radiation will disable it.

The study of such potential nuclear weapons began almost immediately after its appearance, and a few years later the first practical results appeared. In our country, the development of anti-aircraft missile systems with special equipment began in the late forties. By the mid-fifties, such weapons took up combat duty.


Rocket V-750 of the S-75 complex. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

Subsequently, new anti-aircraft systems were created with missiles carrying nuclear warheads. By the early sixties, in connection with the emergence of new threats, specialized missile defense systems were being developed - and they again used special charges. For a long time, nuclear warheads were present in both areas, but then the situation began to change. To date, the role of such weapons has been reduced and it remains in only one area.

Air defense


In 1955, combat duty of the first Soviet anti-aircraft missile system, the S-25 Berkut, began. Several dozen regiments with such air defense systems were deployed in the Central Industrial Region to protect against strategic aviation potential adversary. Depending on the level of threat, the Berkut crews could use missiles with conventional or special combat equipment.

The V-300 anti-aircraft guided missile for the S-25 complex was regularly equipped with a high-explosive fragmentation warhead weighing 320 kg. A bomber-type target was hit and destroyed within a radius of 70-75 m. At a greater distance, the target was damaged, but its destruction was not guaranteed. At the same time, the rocket could not show sufficient guidance accuracy in all cases.

In the first half of the fifties, a nuclear warhead was developed for the B-300. With the same dimensions and weight as a standard charge, it had a power, according to various sources, of 10-20 kt. The radius of destruction of this product reached 2 km - it could simultaneously hit an entire air force.


S-400 launchers in position. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

In the mid-fifties, a rocket with a special warhead was tested at the Kapustin Yar test site, after which it was put into service. According to the state, the regiment on the S-25 was supposed to have three such missiles. They were planned to be used in repelling a massive raid, which "ordinary" missiles would not have been able to handle.

In 1957, the Soviet army received a new SA-75 Dvina air defense system, which was later replaced by the more advanced S-75 Desna. Like its predecessor, this complex could use missiles with different combat equipment. The standard was a high-explosive fragmentation warhead weighing less than 200 kg. The range of destruction of large air targets reached 200-250 m.

In the early sixties, a missile with a 75 kt nuclear warhead was developed for one of the upgraded versions of the S-15. Apparently, the radius of destruction of such a charge was at the warhead level for the S-25. Whether tests of such a charge were carried out is unknown. It should be noted that the high power of the warhead was again used to compensate for possible deviation from the target.

As in the case of the S-25, the anti-aircraft regiment received several nuclear-powered missiles. They should be placed on launchers and used by special order in the event of a difficult situation and the need to deal with a large number of air targets.


Transport-loading vehicle with a container for anti-missile 51T6. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

In the mid-seventies, the obsolete S-25 air defense systems began to be decommissioned and replaced with modern models. Nuclear missiles for them were sent for disassembly, and the components of the warheads were then used in the manufacture of new products. The process of replacing the S-75 started in the eighties and was also accompanied by the decommissioning of high-power missiles.

Missile Defense


Since the late fifties, the future missile defense system for Moscow and the Central Industrial Region has been developed, which later received the designation A-35. A lot of new components were created for her, incl. interceptor missile A-350 with special combat capabilities. To obtain the required power, it was necessary to use a special high-power warhead.

The first modifications of the A-350 product were completed with a thermonuclear warhead with a capacity of 2 Mt. High power made it possible to increase the radius of guaranteed damage and compensate for a possible miss. In addition, ionizing radiation and a neutron flux could cause the decay of fissile material in the target warhead and provoke its premature operation or neutralization. Guaranteed defeat was provided at a distance of 200 m.

Subsequently, warheads for anti-missiles were improved. According to some reports, it was possible to reduce their weight and dimensions, as well as reduce the requirements for missiles. At the same time, the power decreased to tens of kilotons, but the combat qualities and impact on the target remained at the required level. The improved charges were used on the 51T6 and 53T6 missiles from the A-135 system.

According to known data, the 51T6 anti-missiles were taken off duty in the 53s and decommissioned due to the expiration of their service life. 6TXNUMX remain in service to this day. In addition, in the tenth years, this product was modernized with an increase in the main characteristics. According to some reports, the project also included the replacement of military equipment.


Launch of the upgraded 53T6. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Current situation


In the field of air defense, nuclear warheads were used only in the S-25 and S-75 complexes. The following domestic air defense systems did not receive such combat equipment. By improving technologies and components, it was possible to increase the accuracy of the hit and get the maximum probability of hitting. The need for complex and expensive nuclear charges simply disappeared - effective destruction is also provided by high-explosive fragmentation charges.

However, the development of special warheads can continue. So, at the beginning of the tenth years, the possibility of creating such a product for one of the missiles of the S-400 system was mentioned in the open press. Whether such a project existed is unknown. Even if it was developed, the real results have not yet appeared. Perhaps there was an error or a deliberate modification in publications on this topic.

In the field of missile defense, the situation looks different. Recently, the A-135 system was upgraded, which included updating the main anti-missile. The 53T6M product could retain the previous combat equipment, although it is also expected to be abandoned. In addition, a new A-235 system is being created and built, in which nuclear anti-missiles may also be present.

Predictable future


To all appearances, the position of nuclear warheads in the field of air and missile defense has been finally determined and will not undergo any serious changes. The use of such equipment in air defense systems no longer makes sense due to the development of technology and the achievement of the necessary characteristics.

At the same time, special warheads in the missile defense area should be preserved, where all their characteristic advantages can be used. However, the emergence of new anti-missiles with other principles for hitting targets is possible. A further increase in guidance accuracy, which makes it possible to switch to conventional warheads or even to kinetic interception, will make it possible to abandon nuclear charges in this area as well. But so far, nothing is known about the prerequisites for such changes.
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -13
    9 September 2022 16: 25
    we know
    in the suburbs near the Moscow Ring Road: Lytkarino, Korolev, Vnukovo, Planernaya, Sofrino - 5 positions at 68 PR
    with BC 136 YABCH for 2 MT = 272 Megatons
    if it explodes there will be a large cluster of lakes or big lake moscow
    1. KCA
      +10
      9 September 2022 16: 34
      Why does it suddenly explode? It is necessary to put it into a combat position, it is necessary that the detonation of the initiating charge should work properly, and so the TNB can be dropped from space or shot with cannons, maximum contamination of a limited area with plutonium and, if they do not burn out, with lithium and beryllium
      1. -3
        9 September 2022 18: 51
        joke - do not explode
        they removed all the thermonuclear warheads from the anti-missile systems of the A-135 missile defense system
      2. 0
        10 September 2022 09: 59
        theory
        we have all thermonuclear nuclear warheads
        seed uranium, and plutonium for crimping
        and the gain is the main large mass is tritium or deuterium
        when even the 1st nuclear warhead is blown up, a body kit of other nuclear warheads - tritium or deuterium will be added to the reaction
        those. even 1 nuclear warhead in 500 CT can increase to a power of up to 272 MT
        chain reaction
        practice
        this cannot be because all arsenals are protected from nuclear warheads
    2. Egg
      +8
      9 September 2022 17: 18
      chatterbox - a find for the spy
    3. 0
      9 September 2022 17: 22
      How can 136 rockets explode at the same time?
    4. AUL
      0
      10 September 2022 07: 01
      Quote: Romario_Argo
      we know
      in the suburbs near the Moscow Ring Road: Lytkarino ....,

      Chatterbox - a find for the spy!
      1. +1
        10 September 2022 08: 03
        Chatterbox

        suburbs, intersection of Kashirskoye and Kartinsky highways, Aparinki
        to Moscow Ring Road 2,5 km
    5. -1
      13 September 2022 13: 37
      What are megatons? First, everything is in the mines. And secondly, nothing just works. If a warhead falls there, it will just scatter what it can around
  2. Egg
    +12
    9 September 2022 16: 38
    In the field of air defense, nuclear warheads were used only in the S-25 and S-75 complexes.

    I served on the S-200, in a group of divisions there were 4 missiles with a nuclear warhead.
    yes, for clarification.
    1. +3
      9 September 2022 16: 50
      Well, yes, 3 per group and 1 separate, all were stored on the group
    2. 0
      10 September 2022 01: 18
      Quote: Telur
      In the field of air defense, nuclear warheads were used only in the S-25 and S-75 complexes.

      I served on the S-200, in a group of divisions there were 4 missiles with a nuclear warhead.
      yes, for clarification.

      We also had them in the regiment (S-200).
    3. ban
      0
      10 September 2022 06: 28
      In the group, there was one zrdn, adapted for this case, in the same place, after all, the PU is slightly different from the usual
    4. 0
      10 September 2022 10: 59
      thermonuclear warheads are used in missile defense to screen out decoys from real nuclear warheads
      and for the destruction of nuclear warheads by neutron irradiation - the Americans call it bubbly - neutralization of nuclear warheads due to the inability to make a starting nuclear explosion
  3. +4
    9 September 2022 16: 41
    The author is not accurate
    There is one platoon with the Nuclear Unit per regiment, and these are 6 launchers, and the S-25 Berkut Feathers were created for the Moscow Air Defense District, they were nowhere else, the S-25 served until 1986
    There was an excellent complex, the only one who could repel a massive strike from 2 thousand aircraft
  4. +4
    9 September 2022 17: 09
    For those who are really interested in this question, I recommend reading
    "Kisunko G.V., Secret Zone: Confession of the General Designer. - M .: Sovremennik, 1996." (available on the Internet).
    1. +3
      10 September 2022 11: 26
      about! a situation when a comment is more useful than the article itself! thank you!
    2. 0
      13 September 2022 13: 38
      Actually, a lot of books about Soviet missile defense have already been written, even 20 years ago. Now I don’t remember the names, I bought a couple freely in the bookstore. Seek and you will find...
  5. -3
    9 September 2022 17: 45
    It is better to launch such fireworks over the territory of the enemy. But not like there will be a lot of collateral damage over your own. am
  6. +10
    9 September 2022 17: 58
    she had the power according to various sources, 10-20 ct

    Apparently, the radius of destruction of such a charge was at the warhead level for the S-25.

    Were there any tests of such a charge, unknown.

    According to some sources, managed to reduce their weight and dimensions

    According to some sources, the project also included the replacement of military equipment

    Was there such a project unknown

    Apparently, the position of nuclear warheads in the field of air and missile defense is finally determined

    Half of the interpretation article on the topic "there is an elderberry in the garden, and an uncle in Kyiv" or "seventh water on jelly." At the same time, S-200 is not mentioned in the article, as if it never existed. I wanted to finish the comment with an immortal classic: "this has never happened and here it is again!" And we must wish the author to study the topic being raised more deeply ...
    But so far, nothing is known about the prerequisites for such changes.

    Nothing personal, just criticism. hi
  7. +1
    9 September 2022 18: 02
    Could only be used during a massive air raid !!! Do not frighten people who are not knowledgeable with your "knowledge", do not, to nothing !!! am request stop
    1. 0
      10 September 2022 01: 21
      Quote: pleschakovai
      ogli be used only during a massive air raid !!!

      also for jammers and carriers of nuclear weapons.
  8. +1
    9 September 2022 20: 01
    Some Internet "experts" attribute the nuclear warhead to the 77N6-N1 missile defense system ... For example, in China ...: The 77N6-N anti-missile is designed for exoatmospheric interception of ballistic missiles at an altitude of up to 165 kilometers. To destroy satellites in low orbits, the S-500 has a 77N6-N1 missile with a low-yield nuclear warhead, writes Shao Yonglin, a military expert at China National Radio. The translation of the article was published by InoSMI. This "thought" was also supported by some Russian Internet authors, incl. and published on VO ... (Most publications support the assertion that 77N6-N and 77N6-N1 are "kinetic" SAMs ... or: 77N6-N> SAM with OF warhead; and 77N6-H1> with kinetic warhead. ..)
  9. +1
    9 September 2022 21: 35
    The lack of accuracy is compensated by the power of the charge;)

    After 50 years, accuracy has become cheaper.
  10. +1
    9 September 2022 22: 20
    In the field of air defense, nuclear warheads were used only in the S-25 and S-75 complexes. The following domestic air defense systems did not receive such combat equipment.
    It definitely was on the S-200 (at least there was a switch), I think that the possibility of using nuclear warheads is also provided for on subsequent complexes with long-range missiles: the task has not gone away.
  11. +3
    10 September 2022 01: 02
    It would be better to write how they solved the problem of light by undermining the special warheads of their radars
    1. 0
      13 September 2022 13: 42
      We decided back in the 50s by installing protective devices in the input and output paths. Moreover, they are lamp-type even now)) No special interference, the electromagnetic pulse is very short - microseconds, for this time the radar is turned off. Another question is that during high-altitude explosions the state of the ionosphere worsens, and therefore the propagation of radio waves is distorted. This is the real problem, not a glare
  12. +1
    10 September 2022 11: 25
    and the topic is interesting and you can paint great. but... Ryabov...
  13. +1
    10 September 2022 22: 35
    A big request to the site management. Write the name of the author in the title of the article. To not waste time on any rubbish
  14. 0
    11 September 2022 04: 28
    To date, the role of such weapons has been reduced ...
    ///////////////////////////////////
    This also happened as a result of a change in the tactics of using nuclear weapons by long-range and strategic aviation. In the 50-60s, nuclear bombs were mainly used, which had to be dropped directly on objects located on enemy territory. The tactics of using aviation for strikes consisted in the massive use of combat formations of aircraft. At the same time, air defense systems were also improved. And in order to stop the massive use of aviation to strike at strategic targets, air defense units began to receive SBCs and there were formations of nuclear technical support units that were engaged in the storage, maintenance and issuance of SBCs to combat units. In this regard, at present, strategic aviation is completely switched to the use of missile launchers with nuclear SBCs, the launch points of which are located far outside the objects on the territory of opponents, as evidenced by the performance characteristics of our missile launchers used by Tu-160, 160M and Tu 95 MS, MSM. Moreover, non-nuclear missiles can be used.
  15. 0
    13 September 2022 13: 43
    A few funny pictures and the whole article. Boring...
  16. 0
    2 October 2022 20: 04
    The biggest disadvantage of nuclear warheads in the missile defense system is the blinding of their own radars.
    An alternative to special warheads is kinetic interception, which requires precision hits.
  17. +1
    21 October 2022 17: 46
    Today I read an interesting article that the Chinese believe that in order to crash a starlink, it is necessary to undermine 80 mt of nuclear weapons by 10 km and the atmosphere of the upper layers with the release of material will rise to 500 km and burn the brains of satellites without disturbing the long-term radiation situation in orbit. So the main thing is to have something to bang;)
  18. 0
    4 November 2022 19: 58
    There will be no refusal from nuclear charges in missile defense. They are very effective.