VAMPIRE missile system for Ukraine. Simple, cheap and not very useful

44

VAMPIRE complex in combat position


As part of the next package of military-technical assistance, the United States is going to transfer VAMPIRE anti-aircraft missile systems from L3Harris, as well as ammunition for them, to the Kyiv regime. With the help of such equipment, it is planned to strengthen the air defense of the near zone, as well as improve the capabilities of the Ukrainian army to combat unmanned aerial vehicles.



In a new package


The next package of military-technical assistance to Ukraine was approved by Washington on August 24. This time, special attention was paid to air defense systems. Thus, the package provides for the production and supply of a certain number of full-fledged NASAMS air defense systems, and also includes specialized tools for combating UAVs.

Just to fight drones proposed missile system VAMPIRE (Vehicle-Agnostic Modular Palletized ISR Rocket Equipment), developed and supplied by the American company L3Harris. In addition, the package mentions laser-guided missiles of an unnamed type. Perhaps this is ammunition for the new air defense system.

The number of complexes of a new type and ammunition for it is not available in open documents and messages. In addition, the main technical features of such assistance, etc., are not reported. Probably, such issues will begin to be clarified later, as was the case with other deliveries.


The organization of deliveries and their timing raises questions. So, it is not known whether there are complexes for delivery, or whether they have yet to be manufactured. At the same time, in the case of NASAMS air defense systems, it is reported that Ukraine will receive new-made products, the assembly of which will take about two years. Perhaps the VAMPIRE complexes are also not ready for transfer.

The degree of readiness of technology obviously affects the timing of the transfer. Depending on this factor, shipping may start in the coming days or weeks, or in a few months. Apparently, this issue will be clarified only after the real start of deliveries. What will happen by this time and how the situation will change is a big question.

Simplified multi-purpose complex


In the new assistance package, the L3Harris VAMPIRE missile system is considered as a specialized tool for combating UAVs, but in fact it is a multi-purpose system with a wide range of tasks. With the help of regular missiles, it is capable of hitting various ground and air targets, incl. moving. At the same time, the complex is characterized by extreme simplicity of production, installation and operation.

The main features of the complex are reflected in its full name. Thus, a VAMPIRE product leaves the factory on one standard shipping pallet. Such a container contains all the means intended for installation on a carrier. Depending on their needs, the customer can choose one or another configuration of the complex.


Any suitable ground platform, ranging from pickup trucks, can be used as a base for the missile system. A reconnaissance and firing module is installed on the existing cargo area, and a control panel and other devices are mounted in the cockpit. In addition, the complex is connected to the electrical system of the carrier.

The development company claims that the installation of the VAMPIRE complex on the platform takes only two hours and is carried out by two mechanics. In doing so, they must use a standard set of tools available in any garage. Special equipment is not required.

Main Components


The reconnaissance and firing module of the VAMPIRE complex is a lightweight frame made of a metal profile with target equipment. A telescopic mast with an optical-electronic station and a missile launcher are installed side by side on it. Both tools are controlled only remotely.

In the basic configuration, the complex includes a WESCAM MX-10 UES. Such a "ball" has all the necessary channels and allows you to search for ground or air targets at all operating ranges of the complex. There is also a laser rangefinder-target designator for the use of weapons.

The launcher has a swivel base and an oscillating rail package. The launch tubes have a diameter of 70 mm and are designed for AGR-20 APKWS guided missiles. The launch is carried out in almost any direction with the required elevation angle.


ECO and launcher close-up

The APKWS missile is a modernized version of the widely used unguided Hydra 70 projectile. The original missile retains its original warhead and engine, but is equipped with a control unit with a semi-active laser homing head and rudders. After that, the product is able to aim at an object illuminated by a target designator laser. For such guidance, the QUO is declared at the level of 0,5 m.

L3Harris does not specify the firing range of the AGR-20 missile from the ground platform. Aircraft, giving additional acceleration, can apply such weapon over a distance of more than 10 km. For helicopters, this parameter is half as much. Apparently, the firing range of VAMPIRE in all modes is even lower.

The fire control system is made on the basis of a tablet computer in a secure design. A navigation device, a simplified control panel and devices for controlling the OES and PU are connected to it. Using the remote control, the operator can inspect the surrounding area and search for targets, and then fire. The technical features of the SLA and the complex as a whole make it possible to operate in the ground-to-air and ground-to-ground modes.

Practical value


It is easy to see that the L3Harris VAMPIRE multi-purpose missile system is mainly of technical interest. Its creators managed to develop and implement an interesting concept of the weapon system that is as simple as possible in all respects. At the same time, the resulting sample has minimal practical value and is unlikely to be of interest to serious customers.


The advantages of the VAMPIRE product include simplicity of design, low cost and ease of use. Such complexes can be produced in the required quantities and at minimal cost, and then placed on suitable platforms. Preparation for operation and subsequent application will not cause any particular difficulties. At the same time, the complex uses a modified version of one of the most common missiles. In theory, all this allows you to quickly and with limited spending create a large "fleet" of self-propelled missile systems.

The course towards simplification has led to the emergence of several characteristic problems. Thus, the use of an unprotected vehicle dramatically reduces resistance to return fire. ECO as the only means of surveillance limits the ability to detect targets. The selected missile, in turn, when used on the ground, has a minimum range and sharply limits the combat capabilities of the complex, and also increases the risks for it. At the same time, ready-to-use ammunition is limited to only four missiles.

VAMPIRE is offered as a means to combat a variety of targets on the ground and in the air. However, the selected ammunition casts doubt on the effectiveness of such an application. Thus, the existing warheads for Hydra 70 missiles are no longer sufficient to combat modern tanks or fortified structures. Shooting at air targets also raises questions. Even the presence of a laser guidance system does not guarantee the ability to destroy high-speed and / or maneuverable targets.

Benefits and their acquirers


In general, the VAMPIRE complex has a specific appearance and a special combination of tactical and technical characteristics. Finding a suitable tactical niche for such a model is not easy. Of course, if we are talking about a full-fledged army with all the necessary means and systems. In this case, the complex cannot count on the role of supplement or replacement for existing samples.

However, in the case of Ukraine, everything is simpler. Since February, its armed formations have suffered heavy losses in equipment and weapons. For any noticeable restoration of the fleet and the lost combat potential, any available foreign-made samples are now used. The decisive factor is the very fact of their presence, and not the characteristics and real potential.

It is easy to see that such a situation unequivocally suits only the American side. The Pentagon has the opportunity to re-utilize the allocated budget, and L3Harris and its subcontractors receive lucrative contracts for the production of new equipment. In addition, the VAMPIRE developers are probably counting on good publicity. However, the experience of recent months shows that the new complexes will be successfully destroyed by the allied forces, and their reputation will be damaged.
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    30 August 2022 04: 51
    Previously, one Arnie was enough. Now a one-piece pickup is required. wassat
    1. +1
      30 August 2022 07: 10
      By the way, for the war in Syria, that's it ...
  2. +1
    30 August 2022 04: 59
    A kind of jihad mobile with a laser. It would have been minimally relevant in the 1980s in Afghanistan, well, maybe in 1991 in Iraq. Current aircraft, helicopters, and even armored vehicles have laser illumination sensors, and may well send a "gift" to the illumination source.
    1. +7
      30 August 2022 05: 11
      He will stand behind the hut, in the ravine, in the apple orchard, etc. And fuck him answer. The source of radiation is on his bar. Yes, and light equipment can set fire to a lot, hit the windows. And if the UAV illuminates, then along the trenches, closed positions (well, before that they still need to live)
      1. +3
        30 August 2022 07: 25
        Quote: Tlauicol
        closed positions (well, before that they still have to live)

        In Harris' video, the missile is heading down towards a ground target. That is, in principle, only a ball with optics can stick out above the relief.
      2. -2
        30 August 2022 15: 18
        Shoot from air defense systems at light vehicles? Can you make a fire with money?
    2. +6
      30 August 2022 05: 22
      Quote: Nagan
      Current planes, helicopters, and even armored vehicles have laser illumination sensors, and may well send a "gift" to the illumination source.

      Well, stupidity! It is directly written about the fight against UAVs! And here, even if it’s not a penny, but a cheap means of khikhlam, it will be very useful, because the saturation of our army with UAVs is underway, and the SVO, unfortunately, is slipping.
    3. +5
      30 August 2022 06: 00
      The midge, although small compared to the bee, but it bites you so much that it won’t seem small! And go anywhere. So, each weapon has its pluses and minuses. One of the advantages of this complex is its cheapness + simplicity, which allows it to be riveted (judging by the article) on the "knee" in any auto repair shop. And mass covers quality ...
    4. +1
      31 August 2022 22: 37
      You're wrong.

      This air defense system is very relevant and is intended primarily to fight UAVs.

      MANPADS will not be aimed at Orlan-10, and it is expensive to spend a rocket from Buk or Osa, in addition, for this you need to turn on the radar, and this gives out the location of the complex and an anti-radar missile can arrive.

      Laser guidance is implemented in this air defense system and it works in a passive mode, this complex cannot be detected by anything, but it sees everything both day and night.

      The complex is cheap and the missiles for it are also inexpensive, they can make a lot of them and quickly.

      And against helicopters and planes, the Armed Forces of Ukraine and S-300 and Buka and other Western countries will put air defense systems.
  3. -2
    30 August 2022 05: 22
    The launch is carried out in almost any direction with the required elevation angle.
    Interesting. And what will happen to the pickup truck if the target is in the rear hemisphere? Given that the operators in the cockpit.
    1. +1
      30 August 2022 09: 56
      Interesting. And what will happen to the pickup truck if the target is in the rear hemisphere? Given that the operators in the cockpit.

      Operators from the cab will dump into the nearest shelter, at least into a roadside ditch. Surely there is a radio channel for communication with the tablet, and sitting in the cockpit and waiting for arrival (especially considering the radius of detection and destruction of this "monster") is somehow inhumane towards oneself.
  4. +8
    30 August 2022 05: 57
    Everything is fine. Dangerous shit. Allows you to quickly group air defense areas and change your location. Every 2-3 minutes. Thousands of Stingers and Arrows have ended our dominance in the skies of Mazeppia? Here and nevig spit through the lip! It's all about the GASKET in the form of a head! Between weapons and ass! The Great Patriotic War confirmed this! T-34 and KV were better than T3 and T4 at the beginning of the war. ON THE HEAD! But the pads were better with the Fritz, and therefore they beat us in the tail and in the mane at first! ... Dangerous crap.
  5. -4
    30 August 2022 05: 58
    The intensity of the supply of various "not very useful" weapons will bring the course of the so-called SVO (and in fact the war between Russia and NATO on the territory of Ukraine) to its logical conclusion, when the need to strike with tactical nuclear weapons will become in demand. And all that was required was to destroy the transport infrastructure of Ukraine on the western borders.
    Probably, this is the way Russia bleeds NATO's arsenals... To make it easier to resist... The main thing is that the NWO does not drag on for years - so that the Kremlin does not get used to it and does not begin to perceive it as a necessary evil.
    1. 0
      30 August 2022 12: 57
      If we accept the concept of "luring out" NATO weapons, then it is just beneficial to prolong the conflict and not intensively bomb the supply routes. Let them carry and hope. Then carefully dispose of everything or buy it cheaply. Along the way, lower the European industry, leaving without cheap raw materials. The alternative is to push yourself to the limit, win and get a new conflict in the Baltics and Poland. That's it, there will be no more peace!
  6. -1
    30 August 2022 06: 37
    It looks like this from my couch.

    GOS there is still the level of the cornet, the same control over the laser beam. So the launch will not be cheap. Plus, an air hydra rocket, 4 in range 2-2.5 in height, the energy limit.

    It’s easier to fasten the OLS to the blue tape to the BTT and shoot with regular ATGMs so as not to produce entities in the troops. OLS on the bar, by the way, the same BMP-3 with a low ballistics cannon for mounted shooting will go with a bang.
    1. -1
      30 August 2022 07: 42
      It's expensive to shoot a quadcopter from a javelin.
      1. +1
        30 August 2022 08: 56
        Do not confuse javelin and cornet.
        GOS cornet and this prodigy are not fundamentally different. And here and there, laser beam guidance, which is considered one of the cheapest ways to control different types of missiles.
        The holy javelin has a full-fledged IR seeker that costs a lot of money.
        1. +3
          30 August 2022 09: 35
          Now there tou went.

          But Harris solved a specific problem - he made a new complex from ready-made components, which is relevant right now. Cheap and cheerful, as Americans always know how, but rarely want to.
          1. 0
            30 August 2022 10: 28
            Why did you decide that this rocket would be cheap?
            How exactly is controlling a vampire different from controlling a Cornet?
            1. +2
              30 August 2022 10: 58
              Bourgeois write that about the same. Hydra with homing costs 22K (I wrote 10K, I made a mistake). Cornet within 30.
        2. 0
          20 November 2022 18: 29
          Quote: demiurg
          GOS cornet and this prodigy are not fundamentally different.

          The Kornets in service do not have a seeker! 9M133 - "remote-controlled" missiles with a laser-beam guidance system ... "laser trail"! Hydra 70 same with laser seeker (laser semi-active homing!)! The Russian "alternative" can be expressed by "Bulat" with a "laser path" ... and S-8L with a laser seeker! You can "nod" in the direction of "Pine-R"!
      2. -2
        30 August 2022 15: 20
        Khokhlam don't give a fuck - they get everything for free
    2. +4
      30 August 2022 10: 15
      In the United States, a whole program to convert the hydra from unguided rockets to guided ones is used on both airplanes and helicopters.
      This is a cheaper option than a full-fledged ATGM. In addition, how can ATGMs with a tandem cumulative warhead with contact detonation be used against UAVs? It's just expensive and inefficient. And against helicopters, the Cornet, in principle, can be used.
      The APKWS missile has, among other things, a non-contact detonation, a suitable warhead, and therefore is more suitable against UAVs.
      But at the same time it is also suitable against lightly armored targets.
      1. +1
        30 August 2022 16: 27
        Cornet has both HE warheads and a thermal bar.
        The question is, why breed forbs in SMEs? Isn't it easier to mount these OLS on standard equipment?
        1. +1
          30 August 2022 22: 51
          as far as you can understand, the OLS itself with a laser and the launcher are universal, can be mounted on any technique. And a rocket converted from a hydra can significantly reduce the cost of the system. Now this is a trend - cheap guided weapons based on unguided ones - bombs, shells, rockets - now everything is being brought to a guided one.
    3. +3
      30 August 2022 11: 47
      Quote: demiurg
      GOS there is still the level of the cornet, the same control over the laser beam.

      There is no seeker there, a very simple guidance principle known as the "laser trail" is used.
  7. -3
    30 August 2022 07: 21
    The base chassis will be stolen and written off as combat losses! Then they will sell. Don't even go to a fortune teller here! Yes
  8. +1
    30 August 2022 07: 37
    The idea is very interesting, and the most interesting thing about it is that the Americans are looking for options that are needed precisely in the current situation.

    Modern short-range air defense systems (ocelot, avenger) use a stinger missile, which is in short supply. Here, instead of them, the hydra, which, like this one behind the bath, costs 10 times cheaper together with the GOS. By the way, the third Mavic and the GOS Hydra cost about the same, $10K.

    Yes, as an air defense system this thing is inferior to the arrow-10. But when used correctly, it looks very interesting. How it will show itself in the fields - we will soon see.
  9. -1
    30 August 2022 08: 29
    Despite the pros and cons ... a small bug, but smelly
  10. -2
    30 August 2022 10: 01
    Serious badass. Can do shit.
  11. 0
    30 August 2022 10: 29
    Indeed, somehow quite homeless (and good).

    It's good that it's not AIM9, in some kind of single-beam version.
    Aim9 was launched from Chaparelles, and now they are also working out in version X "Dynetics-Raytheon launched the AIM-9X Sidewinder interceptor. According to an industry source, this team used a multi-purpose launcher (MML) developed by the army and Dynetics, but later abandoned The Army and Dynetics have not responded to Jane's questions about the resurrection of the MML interceptor pair and the AIM-9X Sidewinder at the time of writing." https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/abandoned-multi-mission-launcher-aim-9x-sidewinder-pairing-revived-for-us-army-air-defence-competition

    RIM116 would also be bad.
    1. 0
      30 August 2022 11: 44
      Don't touch it, it's for the new year.
      1. +1
        30 August 2022 13: 25
        Hmm, AIM9 will be brought along with NASAS before the New Year, IMHO.

        But with the price of AIM9X under 400 ye, and AIM000 under 120 ue, the idea "to give such hardy lads so as not to go broke, for example - for 1 ye" even for Biden and his budgets looks rational.
        1. +4
          30 August 2022 17: 09
          I mean it

          And the price for an airplane, helicopter, and even for a cruise missile is normal. Shooting down quadrocopters is expensive, of course.
  12. +1
    30 August 2022 14: 35
    The contemptuous attitude of the author is incomprehensible. Good niche product, better with it than without it
  13. -1
    30 August 2022 15: 16
    As I understand it, this is an analogue of a wasp, only guidance is newer
  14. -1
    30 August 2022 15: 23
    This, perhaps, is a means for terrorist attacks and sabotage. In the current hostilities, he is of little use.
  15. 0
    30 August 2022 16: 37
    An ideal means of combating drones would be a 45-57mm projectile with a detonation along a laser beam. Cheap, reach in height and distance of 3-4 and 4-5 km.
    This is the battalion/regiment level.

    What if further?

    Brilliant nonsense: We are making the same projectile for Msta. Reach in height 10-12 km, in range 12-15 km. This is even more than the brigade level.

    Sometimes I think. why am I so smart, and not in the government.
    1. 0
      30 August 2022 17: 23
      Quote: demiurg
      An ideal means of combating drones would be a 45-57mm projectile

      You are describing Oerlikon, 35mm. There are such guns in higher calibers, including 57mm - mainly on ships.
      Quote: demiurg
      We make the same projectile for Msta. Reach in height 10-12 km, in range 12-15 km.

      You will laugh again, but the Americans are now experimenting with the work of 155mm self-propelled guns on air targets.
    2. +2
      30 August 2022 23: 11
      The Americans are now converting unguided 155 mm projectiles into guided ones by replacing the fuse with the XM1156 PGK, which has a built-in GPS control module. Very cheap projectiles are obtained, although their accuracy is formally slightly lower than that of specially designed guided projectiles, but in practice, the KVO in most instances is not inferior to specialized ones. The price of the issue is something around 10 thousand dollars, which is several times cheaper than a special controlled one.
  16. -1
    31 August 2022 09: 53
    they won’t take the T-55 with this missile, plus they already wrote that air defense systems and air defense systems without radar are nothing
  17. +3
    1 September 2022 09: 55
    Thus, the use of an unprotected vehicle dramatically reduces resistance to return fire.

    You can put it on a somewhat secure platform, such as a humvee pickup truck, Ukraine seems to have had such.
    ECO as the only means of surveillance limits the ability to detect targets.

    Yes, but the complex is not particularly designed to deal with something serious, it is rather an analogue of MANPADS with the ability to fire at ground targets, shoot a UAV there or try to shoot down a helicopter, well, there is no target exposure, there are no problems for such a machine and it’s quite difficult to find will be.
    At the same time, ready-to-use ammunition is limited to only four missiles.

    So what? Why might this not be enough? An arrow of some kind also has four rockets in the installation. In addition, Hydras are relatively easy to recharge.
    Thus, the existing warheads for Hydra 70 missiles are no longer sufficient to deal with modern tanks or fortified structures.

    And what about on the battlefield only they? The troops are full of light vehicles for which the hydra is deadly.
    Even the presence of a laser guidance system does not guarantee the ability to destroy high-speed and / or maneuverable targets.

    And they don’t plan to hit high-speed or maneuverable objects with this complex, this is a means of combating UAVs, helicopters and light equipment, you yourself write about this in your article.
  18. -1
    4 September 2022 14: 48
    This complex can only be suitable for firing at helicopters, similar to laser-guided ATGMs. Well, for any ground equipment.
  19. 0
    5 September 2022 10: 23
    According to the characteristics, it is quite suitable against UAVs of the Orlan-10 type and lightly armored targets. Let's see how it will be in practice.