Limited: Vulcano guided missiles from Germany for Ukraine

41
Limited: Vulcano guided missiles from Germany for Ukraine

Vulcano GLR guided projectile in flight


Germany has announced another package of military-technical assistance to Ukraine. For the first time, it includes the new Italian-German-developed Vulcano guided long-range artillery shells. At the same time, the disclosed plans show that such ammunition will have little effect on the firepower of the Ukrainian army, and the true goals of their delivery are far from the declared ones and are not related to aid issues.



Official announcement


On August 17, the German government published the current version of the list of deliveries of military-technical assistance to Ukraine. In addition, they announced the transfer of new products, incl. not previously included in aid packages. So, for the first time in the list weapons Vulcano guided missiles hit for shipment.

According to the plans of the German authorities, only 255 such ammunition will be handed over to the Kyiv regime. These will be projectiles for use with 155 mm caliber systems. Together with the shells, the devices necessary for their full use will be transferred.

It is reported that Vulcano shells for Ukraine will be provided by the German defense industry. The German government will buy them out of its own funds and organize delivery to Ukraine. The cost of such an order is not specified.

The exact timing of the transfer of new ammunition has not yet been named. In addition, some questions about the organization of supplies remain. Thus, it is not clear whether the announced 255 Vulcanos exist for Ukraine. Perhaps they have yet to be ordered and manufactured, and this will seriously shift the shipment time.

The Ukrainian side reacted to news their Germany with predictable enthusiasm. The announced number of shells and the lack of information on the delivery time did not bother her. However, a specific reaction to any foreign samples has long become familiar and does not raise questions.


155mm split-loader round and Vulcano GLR

Long-range and unified


The Vulcano artillery shell is a joint development of the Italian company Oto Melara (now Leonardo) and the German Diehl Defence. Work on this topic began in the middle of the 2008s, and already in XNUMX the first advertising materials and even ready-made components were presented. In the tenth years, the project reached the stage of testing the projectile in different configurations, along with several types of guns.

As part of the project, two versions of the projectile were simultaneously developed. The first, Vulcano BER (Ballistic Extended Range) was uncontrollable and had to show an increased firing range. The second option, Vulcano GLR (Guided Long Range), was also made long-range, but equipped with guidance tools. The shells of both versions are maximally unified.

Vulcano products were developed for use with artillery systems of various calibers. For this, several types of shots are offered with a common projectile and different leading devices of one caliber or another. Depending on the requirements of the weapon, the Vulcano is used in unitary or separate loading shots.

At the moment, manufacturers offer Vulcano shots in three calibers. For naval artillery of NATO standards, 76- and 127-mm unitary ammunition are intended. Land based systems must use the 155mm split-loader shot.

Serial production of Vulcano GLR shells began in 2021. The ground forces of Italy and Qatar became the first customers of such products. They are purchasing a 155mm shot version for use by towed and self-propelled artillery. At the end of this year, the Bundeswehr will begin its own tests of such shells. In the absence of serious difficulties, they are planned to be put into service in 2025.

Technical features


Both variants of the Vulcano projectile are as similar as possible to each other. These are sub-caliber ammunition in an elongated body with a pointed head fairing and six stabilizer feathers in the tail section. The guided version of the projectile also has X-shaped rudders placed behind the fairing.


Seekers: satellite / inertial (left) and laser (right)

The Vulcano has been designed for use with different types of implements in several models. They bring the caliber of the entire system to the required one, and also protect the rudders and stabilizer. A characteristic feature of such devices is the head part of the stepped shape. After exiting the barrel, the master device is reset, and the projectile begins its independent flight.

The controlled Vulcano GLR is equipped with a homing head with satellite and inertial navigation devices. A CVO of less than 5 m is declared. Such a seeker can be replaced by a semi-active laser head of the SAL (Semi-Active Laser) type, which directs the projectile to an illuminated target.

All variants of the projectile are equipped with a high-explosive fragmentation warhead with semi-finished submunitions. Undermining is carried out by a programmable fuse with a radio altimeter. Depending on the program, the ammunition can be detonated at a given height, on contact with the target / surface, or with a selected delay.

An "integration kit" has been developed to work with the electronics of the Vulcano GLR projectile. It includes a computer for fire control and calculations, as well as communications for obtaining target designation. In addition, there is a programmer for entering data into the GOS. In preparation for the shot, it is applied to the head of the projectile; information is transmitted inductively.

The reduced caliber and optimized aerodynamics made it possible to obtain high combat performance. Thus, the Vulcano in the unguided BER modification, when fired from a 155-mm gun with a 39-caliber barrel, flies 39 km. When using a barrel length of 52 klb, the range increases to 50 km. Managed by Vulcano GLR flies even further: long-barreled systems send it to 70 km.

Test batch


In general, Vulcano guided missiles are quite interesting and promising products. This project was based on curious ideas and technical solutions, and as a result, this made it possible to obtain a significant increase in technical, combat and operational characteristics. As a result, Vulcanos are already entering service with foreign countries and attracting new customers.


The device for entering data into the GOS and the use of the programmer

Ukraine may become the next operator of the Italian-German shells. At the same time, the announced supply of ammunition from Germany has characteristic features that cast doubt on the effectiveness of such “aid”. In addition, there are grounds for suspicion that Berlin has special plans.

The German government decided to allocate only 255 guided missiles for Ukraine. Obviously, this is not enough for their active use and any increase in the effectiveness of ground artillery. Such a number of shells is enough only for single attacks with practically no real results.

For comparison, the Kyiv regime has already received hundreds of thousands of "regular" 155-mm rounds - and they did not affect the course of the fighting. At the same time, a significant part of such aid was destroyed by the Russian army long before it hit the firing positions. The remaining ammunition is often used not for combat missions, but for shelling civilian targets.

The declared number of shells is not enough for a full-fledged combat use. At the same time, a batch of 255 shells will be enough for testing in a real combat situation. Apparently, the Bundeswehr wants to test promising shells not only at its training grounds, but also in a real armed conflict. Having collected data on the use of such ammunition, the German military will be able to draw certain conclusions and, possibly, reduce the program of their own field tests.

In addition, financial issues are of great importance. Vulcano is expensive, and the supply of only 255 units. will allow you to collect the required data without excessive costs. At the same time, the real potential of such a party and its benefits for the Kyiv regime fade into the background and are not a decisive factor.

Polygon country


In recent months, foreign partners have repeatedly handed over to the Kyiv regime certain weapons and equipment, including the most modern ones. However, the volumes of such deliveries were often small and limited to only a few or dozens of items. Naturally, such “help” did not affect the combat capabilities of the Ukrainian formations in any way.

At the same time, foreign countries got the opportunity to test their modern designs in an armed conflict against a developed and well-equipped enemy. The next sample to undergo such a test is now the Vulcano guided munition. What will be the results of such "field tests" is not yet clear. However, it is already clear that a real training ground was made from Ukraine, and urban development and civilian objects are considered as a target environment.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    25 August 2022 16: 08
    At the end of this year, the Bundeswehr will begin its own tests of such shells.
    At the "polygon" Ukraine
    The controlled Vulcano GLR is equipped with a homing head with satellite and inertial navigation devices.

    Where are our vaunted electronic warfare systems for jamming satellite navigation
    Such a seeker can be replaced by a semi-active laser head of the SAL (Semi-Active Laser) type, which aims the projectile at an illuminated target.
    What do they illuminate? UAV or DRG?
    1. -9
      25 August 2022 16: 38
      Where are our vaunted electronic warfare systems for jamming satellite navigation

      Are ours coping so far without the "praised electronic warfare"? cope.
      And it's not worth it to shine them now.
      What did the GDP say? NATO borders by 1997? then we’ll show them, so to speak, we’ll present a fact, over their entire impudent Western muzzle ..
      1. +2
        25 August 2022 18: 39
        "That's when we'll show them" - and when?
  2. +2
    25 August 2022 16: 28
    This is the "Russian genocide" that colleague Scholz laughed at.
    Will we catch shells so that later (someday) we will study them somewhere in Chelyabinsk or, finally, will we start turning off their satellites?
    You can also test your "high-precision" rocket at the manufacturer.
    Need political will.
    1. +1
      25 August 2022 19: 05
      Quote: iouris
      You can also test your "high-precision" rocket at the manufacturer.

      The shelling of Germany or Italy, and even any other Poland, is a world war without question. Is it for you?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. -1
        25 September 2022 21: 55
        Quote: Nagan
        Quote: iouris
        You can also test your "high-precision" rocket at the manufacturer.

        The shelling of Germany or Italy, and even any other Poland, is a world war without question. Is it for you?


        This is just not what I think. They themselves will not trample, and the States will not burn in nuclear ashes for the sake of the Germans and Italians.
        There is simply no political will to give such an answer to the partners.
        But perhaps this is indeed premature or not necessary at all.
      3. +1
        3 November 2022 11: 01
        Why shoot.
        A tourist passing by will forget the bag.
        But it's better to blow up the LNG / oil storage terminals, that's where they howl.
        1. +1
          10 November 2022 15: 31
          Many tourists will forget many bags at the substations? With us, such a trick will not work, if they can still poke a finger at roosters, or at each other, then we don’t even poke a finger at anyone. But the fact that the Hymars shells will suddenly start to confuse directions and countries, this can be quite arranged. It is enough to arrange for them something like a MIM attack in the form of a substitution of the current coordinates. That's just to find normal specialists in the Moscow Region.
  3. 0
    25 August 2022 16: 55
    And it is impossible to organize any accident at the manufacturer?
    Smoking there, in the wrong place or something else?
    1. +2
      25 August 2022 16: 57
      Quote: Ua3qhp
      And it is impossible to organize any accident at the manufacturer?
      Smoking there, in the wrong place or something else?

      You ask Petrov and Bashirov a question wink
  4. +3
    25 August 2022 18: 11
    For the first time, it includes the new Italian-German-developed Vulcano guided long-range artillery shells. At the same time, the disclosed plans show that such ammunition will have little effect on the firepower of the Ukrainian army, and the true goals of their delivery are far from the declared ones and are not related to aid issues.
    Of course of course; fresh and original idea... winked
  5. +3
    25 August 2022 18: 38
    "the Kyiv regime has already received hundreds of thousands of "regular" 155-mm shots - and they did not affect the course of the battles" - they did not affect at all. True, the war, for some reason, has been going on for six months. And the front line hasn't been moving much for 3 months now. But these things obviously have nothing to do with each other.
    1. -2
      25 August 2022 22: 37
      But these things obviously have nothing to do with each other.

      By the way, no...
      Here are hundreds of thousands of 152-mm shells - they influenced ...
      1. -2
        26 August 2022 06: 52
        Actually, all significant successes were achieved in the first 2 weeks, maximum a month of the war. Even before the mass use of hundreds of thousands of 152mm shells began.
        1. +4
          26 August 2022 07: 38
          why lie about 2-3 weeks? In June, Severodonetsk and Lisichansk were liberated. Now the fortified area in Sands and Avdeevka has been destroyed.
          1. 0
            26 August 2022 12: 49
            Severodonetsk and Lisichansk are 30*30 km. Liberated area. Sands and Avdiivka are still a disputed area. Have you seen these territories on the scale of Ukraine?
            There is a good example where the movement of the front by dates is superimposed on the map. It is clearly seen there that since April the front has, in fact, froze.
            If there is a desire, I can send a link in a personal. I do not want to publish here, it is not beautiful.
            1. +2
              26 August 2022 13: 48
              Severodonetsk and Lisichansk are 30*30 km. Liberated area.

              this is a strategic area, the liberation of which led to the complete liberation of the territory of the Luhansk Republic. Few? Not relevant?
              that since April the front has, in fact, froze.

              those who want to kick our fighters in the ass with a demand to speed up the offensive should be pulled off warm sofas, given a machine gun in their hands and sent to speed up this very offensive
              1. 0
                26 August 2022 18: 17
                Certainly not enough and no longer relevant. You won't find this "strategic" area on the map without zoom. They gnawed off 2 towns in 3 months and ran into the next line of defense. The last exhalation of Mr. Pe Zhe is something. Half of the Donetsk region is still under Ukraine, it’s already dumb to hold a referendum.
                About wishing to kick - are absolutely right. In the sense that despite the front 2/3 of the approval, the ABSOLUTE majority of the population prefers to root for the Russian team in shooting from the couch. My hut is on the edge, yeah. They say that in volunteer battalions it is very often possible to recruit a company. Well, not from a good life, volunteers are recruited from prisons.
                As for forced mobilization, I see what happens here as with forced vaccination. Maybe that's why they don't start. But this is a topic for a separate discussion.
          2. 0
            26 August 2022 13: 11
            Although, why not?
            https://m.youtube.com/shorts/7f2bHb6DEv0
        2. 0
          26 August 2022 09: 12
          Mariupol was taken not in the first month of the war ....
          We have already written about the Lisichansk agglomeration above ...
          1. 0
            26 August 2022 12: 53
            About Lisichansk already answered above. About Mariupol - following the results of a month of fighting, he was surrounded and reliably cut off from Ukrainian troops near Donetsk. Further, the front existed separately, Mariupol separately. And after the encirclement, there were no chances due to geography. The only question was: how long would they last.
            1. 0
              27 August 2022 01: 15
              If about a half-million agglomeration - this is "2 towns in three months" - then yes, they answered ...
              Shameful answer came out ....
              hi

              However, about Mariupol - even more shameful in the context of the previously stated thesis ...
              Since Mariupol is "separately", apparently, Mariupol taken is also "separately" ....
              1. 0
                29 August 2022 08: 51
                Severodonetsk is a district center, you can walk it in an hour on foot. But against the background of the lack of other successes, this, of course, will do. At this rate, the captured village will soon be presented as the greatest achievement. Strategic, yes.
                What are you doing with this Mariupol? You look at the map, after it was cut off, it was immediately clear how it would end. Mariupol was, pardon the analogy, a large Brest fortress. Those. had the task of pulling the enemy’s forces as much as possible and symbolizing steadfastness, inflexibility, and that’s all. And so on until there is enough stock.
                The current configuration of the front was formed following the results of the first month of fighting, then there were purely cosmetic changes. There is a video above, everything is perfectly visible there.
                1. -1
                  29 August 2022 11: 40
                  Severodonetsk is a district center, you can walk it in an hour on foot. But against the background of the lack of other successes, this, of course, will do

                  In fact, it was about the Lisichansk industrial agglomeration of half a million ...
                  If reading is a problem, then I can't help you...
                  hi
                  What are you doing with this Mariupol? You look at the map, after it was cut off, it was immediately clear how it would end. Mariupol was, pardon the analogy, a large Brest fortress. Those. had the task of pulling the enemy’s forces as much as possible and symbolizing steadfastness, inflexibility, and that’s all. And so on until there is enough stock.

                  During the Second World War, it was not possible to liquidate the Courland Cauldron, Breslau was not taken in three months ...
                  If the ochkonauts from Azov and others were not cowards, then Mariupol could be defended for half a year...
                  And so, in recent weeks, ours did not take Mariupol, but Azovstal before the UN "patted the head" with negotiations and persuasion ...

                  So Mariupol is a great achievement and we will "rush" with it ....
                  1. 0
                    29 August 2022 17: 25
                    Well, yes, well, yes, a whole agglomeration. Having the status of a district center, yeah. I say: soon any farm taken will be for joy. And you will tell that this is not a farm, but a whole village, or rather, even a village. Which was a strategic fortified area, and now the enemy is definitely the end.
                    In Mariupol - as far as I know: the surrender there occurred due to the exhaustion of the possibility of resistance, by order of the command (from Kyiv). What's the problem then? Since the Second World War was remembered, then remember how most of the festung cities ended. If you don't know, I can send a good lecture from Ogarkov's readings.
                    1. -2
                      29 August 2022 20: 35
                      Well, yes, well, yes, a whole agglomeration. Having the status of a district center, yeah. I say: soon any farm taken will be for joy. And you will tell that this is not a farm, but a whole village, or rather, even a village. Which was a strategic fortified area, and now the enemy is definitely the end

                      If in the wording "Lysychansk industrial agglomeration" you don't even see one more settlement - besides Severodonetsk - by the name, then I feel sorry for your relatives: it's hard for them to work with you ...
                      hi
                      In Mariupol - as far as I know: the surrender there occurred due to the exhaustion of the possibility of resistance, by order of the command (from Kyiv). What's the problem then?

                      No problem: I see success!
                      Since the Second World War was remembered, then remember how most of the festung cities ended.

                      What for?
                      1. -1
                        30 August 2022 10: 36
                        The city of Lisichansk is, of course, not a village, but it does not even have a regional status. But the way you present the capture of the "Lisichansk industrial agglomeration" with what aspiration is, of course, amusing. We just compare (the maps above) what was occupied during the 1st month of the war, and what was occupied over the remaining 5 months (the whole agglomeration). Well, as they say - to whom the mare is the bride. Don't lose Kherson. Although you will find an explanation for this (goodwill gesture?)
                        "I see success" - yes, success. Which was predetermined in the first month of the war.
                        "Why" - to understand that all the fortified cities, having fettered part of the enemy's forces, were taken as a result. And not to say that it took a long time. The same was to happen with Mariupol.
  6. +1
    25 August 2022 18: 59
    However, it is already clear that a real training ground was made from Ukraine, and urban development and civilian objects are considered as a target environment.


    It would be very nice of the Ukrainian side to knock out civilian targets without touching the military at all. However, if we return to reality, then the supply of Vulcano (and Excalibur) gives the Ukrainian side the opportunity to use 52klb systems as additional OTRKs, comparable in their capabilities to the notorious highmars. Quite an interesting option.
  7. 0
    25 August 2022 19: 00
    Here are the Germans: we seem to give, but so far they are not. And, yes, they seem to be, but when they will be personally for the outskirts is unknown. How many in pieces, but the value is not yet known. They seem to be given, but they simply expressed their intentions.
  8. -1
    25 August 2022 19: 58
    Russia is testing weapons for the West for free.
  9. +1
    25 August 2022 22: 08
    255 pikes are not so few ... This is pike goods for special purposes - guns, self-propelled guns, armored vehicles in position, command posts, pillboxes, etc. Enough for infantry and noermal shells!
  10. +2
    25 August 2022 23: 54
    we would also need such shells in the army, a simple solution to increase the firing range is to make the shell sub-caliber, thereby raising its speed (1130 m / s) compared to the usual 155 mm., and its mass is less than 18 kg. against 48 for a conventional projectile, but on the other hand, the range can reach up to 80-100 km from modern barrels ...
    1. 0
      26 August 2022 05: 43
      18 kg is a very weak projectile. Himars is probably more powerful if we are talking about 80-100 km. And the money is probably comparable.
      1. 0
        26 August 2022 08: 36
        you always have to compare something with something, there is no concept - a "weak projectile" is weaker than the classic 155-152 mm., But then they can also be called "weak" compared to Pion's 203 mm shells, and those, in turn, " weak "relative to 305 mm, etc., this projectile, despite the fact that it has a smaller mass, has a significantly higher speed, which, firstly, led to an increase in the firing range, and secondly, the penetrating ability increased, although here it is more likely my conjectures, since there is no open information on whether this projectile has a greater penetrating power or less compared to the usual one, this is evidenced by a higher speed and a smaller diameter, against a significant weight loss ...
        1. +1
          26 August 2022 14: 18
          He has a high speed in the initial segment of the ballistic trajectory. On descending, it has approximately the same speed, most likely even less than that of uncontrolled ones, aerodynamics are worse due to thrusters. Its specific gravity is lower, so the final velocity should be lower.
          On "cheapness" the same question. Management costs the bulk of the cost, but the power of the ammunition itself is extremely limited.
          For me, it’s better to screw the controlled module into the head of the 203 mm projectile, the efficiency will be higher
          1. ada
            0
            27 August 2022 02: 48
            Obviously, you are right, but I ask you to pay attention to giving artillery systems properties of the WTO in the tactical and operational-tactical depth of military operations. As noted above:
            Quote: Negro
            ... However, if we return to reality, then the supply of Vulcano (and Excalibur) gives the Ukrainian side the opportunity to use 52klb systems as additional OTRKs, comparable in their capabilities to the notorious highmars. ...
            , it is also obvious that these issues are being worked out with a steady trend in the US-NATO to expand the possibility of using (enlisting) conventional weapons systems to defeat the enemy’s CVO in a combined (multi-medium) operation, both unchanged with a conventional BP, and with retrofitting or re-equipment ( the creation of new) of these systems with the BP UO and the inclusion in the combat control system of the GSOU of the US Armed Forces (US-NATO Joint Forces), in particular, in the CU subsystems - the automated combat control system (ASBU) of forces and the exchange of information C4I2 (Command, Control, Computers Communications and Information/Intelligence); a system that ensures the use of high-precision weapons. As noted earlier: "... Such an approach, according to military experts, provides three important advantages: high damaging effect, compliance with the "cost / effectiveness" criterion, reducing the risk of defeating one's own forces. They are especially important in the case of US participation in the settlement of regional conflicts , which are most likely in the future, as well as during peacekeeping operations. ...". (Foreign media, Pentagonus website and ZVO materials)
            At the same time, a significant part of the operational tasks to defeat the CVO needs to be performed in the depths of the operational zone, which requires a compromise in relation to artillery systems - reducing the power of the BP, but increasing the accuracy and range of fire in order to give them the properties of the WTO of the operational-tactical level, according to which - either of the signs (of course, not to OTRK).
            Quote: Demon_is_ada
            ... it is better to screw the controlled module into the head of the 203 mm projectile, the efficiency will be higher

            Of course, it is possible to hit some of the targets (KVO) characteristic of BM systems in tactical depth with this type of retrofitted ammunition in the UAO complex (approaching the characteristics of the initially developed WTO), but it is limited by its usual range and the capabilities of the "control module" to adjust the trajectory. Such a "carcass" will require advanced controls with more powerful steering machines and an increase in the area of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbthe feather of the rudders, and on the installation - a navigation system, an ACCS terminal with additional. devices for inputting information into the BP, a new TS for the BP.
  11. 0
    4 October 2022 13: 51
    It would be interesting to know when our army will finally receive the long-awaited self-propelled guns "Coalition" SV, well, how much can we refine it, it's time to put it into mass production, our army really needs it.
    1. -3
      9 October 2022 11: 10
      It is written that they produced 1 pc. per year, in three shifts there will be 3 pcs. per year, how much do you need?
  12. 0
    5 October 2022 14: 44
    and delivery of only 255 units. will allow you to collect the required data without excessive costs.
    And hit 255 of our batteries, warehouses or headquarters with the first shot ... A trifle, of course ...
  13. 0
    11 November 2022 08: 09
    I read that 255 high-precision enemy shells "will not affect the course of the war in any way," and I am indignant to the core. The author does not understand that from these shells one of our soldiers will certainly die or be maimed. Does not understand that the first delivery will be followed by the second, third and so on. He does not understand that from the multitude of such allegedly insignificant deliveries, a very difficult situation for us at the front is formed.
    Where does such frivolity come from?
  14. 0
    18 November 2022 11: 26
    The reduced caliber and optimized aerodynamics made it possible to obtain high combat performance. Thus, the Vulcano in the unguided BER modification, when fired from a 155-mm gun with a 39-caliber barrel, flies 39 km. When using a barrel length of 52 klb, the range increases to 50 km. Managed by Vulcano GLR flies even further: long-barreled systems send it to 70 km.

    1. A 155 mm caliber does not have a very large charge anyway, and if the entire charge is taken away and the space for navigation and homing systems will be even less - no more than 6 kg.
    2. All components for different control systems must withstand the load when the projectile is fired - their price increases exponentially. The price of this projectile will be at least 100 thousand euros / dollars.
    3. Increased flight range means less ability to hit non-stationary targets. The flight time of the projectile is longer and the moving target moves further in this time.
    4. Homing heads, target illumination, etc. means that it is possible to use well-established countermeasures.

    As a result, we get a very expensive and inefficient weapon. For comparison, it will deliver 6 kg of explosive per 100 km. with the same accuracy it is possible with a UAV weighing 30-40 kilograms and costing no more than 2 thousand euros / dollars.