Ukraine develops British Husky TSV armored vehicles

19
Ukraine develops British Husky TSV armored vehicles

British Husky TSV in one of the Ukrainian parts

The UK is transferring several types of armored vehicles to Ukraine. Recently it became known about the delivery of the first batch of machines such as Husky TSV. With their help, Ukrainian formations will be able to partially restore recent losses and to some extent improve their capabilities. However, in general, the prospects for such assistance are obvious - armored cars will not have a noticeable impact on current events, and then they will add to the list of losses.

Armored supplies


Back in early April, it became known that the UK plans to help Ukraine by supplying a certain number of armored vehicles. Soon the first details appeared in the British media. It was alleged that the Ministry of Defense of the kingdom is ready to allocate armored vehicles that were previously in operation and are now in reserve or in storage. It was also planned to train Ukrainian crews.



It was about 120 combat and auxiliary vehicles of four types. It was planned to send three-axle Mastiff armored vehicles, protected Wolfhound trucks, as well as lighter Husky TSV armored vehicles to Ukraine. In addition, several dozen FV103 Spartan tracked armored personnel carriers were allocated. The number of cars of each model has not yet been specified.

It took several weeks to prepare the equipment and other procedures, and deliveries did not begin until May. From the end of May appear news on the development of such machines by the recipient army. So, the first photos and videos with Husky armored cars in parts appeared on Ukrainian resources on June 10-11.


Armored cars in Zaporozhye region

A few days later, footage from the war zone was published. It is alleged that units on the Husky TSV are deployed on the territory of the Zaporozhye region, which is still controlled by the Ukrainian army. Details of the use of such a technique are not yet available.

In addition, there have not yet been reports of the destruction of such armored cars or taking them as a trophy. Obviously, the main reason for this is their recent entry into the unit. As practice shows, the loss of new technology is only a matter of time.

Foreign development


Like some other modern British Army armored cars, the Husky TSV is of foreign origin. This machine was developed and produced by the American corporation Navistar International. Its basic version called MXT-MVA (Military Extreme Truck - Military Version Armored) was first introduced in 2006 at the US Army Association conference.

In the middle of the 2008s, the MXT-MVA multi-purpose machine and several of its modifications passed factory tests. Then they were submitted to the Pentagon M-ATV competition, the purpose of which was to select a promising protected transport for ground units. In XNUMX, an armored car from Oshkosh became the winner of the competition, and Navistar International had to look for new customers.

During this period, the British army was looking for a new armored car. She needed an MRAP machine with a high level of ballistic and mine protection, which could be obtained in the near future. It was planned to send such armored cars to Afghanistan and use them to replace the protected modification of the Land Rover SUV, which did not meet all the requirements.


British Army Husky

The UK Ministry of Defense got acquainted with the available offers and chose the MXT-MVA armored car. In April 2009, a contract appeared for the production and supply of 262 such vehicles in an updated configuration, and a few months later the first such armored car was shown. By the end of the year, the first batch of equipment was handed over to the customer. Armored cars were adopted under the name Husky Tactical Support Vehicle (TSV).

Already next year, an additional order for 89 armored vehicles appeared. The implementation of two contracts continued until 2012, and as a result, the UK received 351 units. new technology. A significant part of the armored cars was soon deployed in Afghanistan and actively operated. Quite quickly, the new armored cars demonstrated superiority over the armored Land Rover.

However, a few years later, the British army left Afghanistan, which is why the future of the Husky and other MRAP armored cars was in question. Soon the reduction of the park began. To date, the British army had 320 machines of this type, of which 120 were transferred to the reserve or put into storage.

Now, unnecessary equipment has found new owners. A number of Husky TSVs are being transferred to Ukraine. In addition, at the end of May it became known that 70 of these machines will continue to serve in the armed forces of Ghana.


Technical features


The Husky TSV and base MXT-MVA are MRAP-class armored vehicles on a two-axle all-wheel drive chassis. In terms of main components and assemblies, the armored car is maximally unified with the International MXT commercial truck. It can carry up to six people, including the driver, and also take some cargo on board.

The two-axle armored car is equipped with an International VT 365 diesel engine with an HP 325 power. and Allison 2500SP transmission with power distribution to all wheels. The undercarriage has an independent lever suspension. The declared maximum speed on the highway is more than 100 km / h. Power reserve - 400 km.

"Husky" has an armored hull bonnet layout with a two-row cockpit. Behind the cab is a cargo platform. The hull has modular armor from Plasan Sasa. It is reported about bulletproof and anti-fragmentation protection, as well as protection against undermining. However, the exact level of protection is unknown.

A rotary turret with circular armor is installed on the roof of the hull. It can be equipped with a normal or large caliber machine gun or an automatic grenade launcher. Application of personal weapons the crew is not provided, and there are no loopholes in the hull.

Objective limitations


Until February, the Ukrainian army had several hundred armored vehicles, which can be considered as analogues of the British Husky. However, in recent months this park has undergone forced demilitarization and has been drastically reduced. Foreign countries are trying to supply their equipment, but the restoration of the former numbers is far away, and new blows and losses prevent this.


In recent weeks, the UK has handed over to Ukraine several dozen armored vehicles, incl. a number of two-axle "Husky". There is no reason to believe that such supplies will positively affect the state of the Ukrainian army. There is too little technology, and it will not make up for the losses incurred.

Quality indicators, apparently, are also far from ideal. So, at one time, Husky / MXT-MVA lost the Oshkosh M-ATV armored car in the competition, which indicates some technical problems or limited performance. At the same time, such a machine suited the British army and did not cause any particular complaints during operation.

In the course of work in Afghanistan, the Huskies showed themselves well and coped with the assigned work. However, in the current situation, their prospects are doubtful. Armored cars of the MRAP class were created for low-intensity conflicts and use against partisan formations. However, Ukraine is trying to resist a full-fledged modern army with all the necessary troops and weapons. Accordingly, armored cars are exposed to serious risks both on the front line and in the rear - and at any moment they can be hit.

Generally useless


According to current plans, the UK is to transfer to Ukraine 120 armored vehicles for transporting personnel - three types of wheeled armored vehicles and one tracked armored personnel carrier. Deliveries have begun, and some of the vehicles have already entered the war zone. At the same time, their potential is very limited, and the prospects in the current situation do not give the Ukrainian side any reason for optimism.

The reasons for this are known and understandable. London is trying to help the Kyiv regime to solve its own military-political problems. At the same time, the scale of such assistance is limited by the quantitative and qualitative capabilities of the British army. By helping Ukraine, the UK - and not only it - does not want to harm its own armed forces. Such an approach completely excludes any changes in the situation in favor of the Ukrainian side and can only delay the course of hostilities. But even this completely suits foreign "partners".
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    27 June 2022 05: 56
    In the course of work in Afghanistan, the Huskies showed themselves well and coped with the assigned work. However, in the current situation, their prospects are doubtful.

    Exactly, these armored vehicles will be mainly destroyed by our artillery, aviation, as well as tanks and anti-tank weapons.
    1. 0
      27 June 2022 17: 19
      conventional 30 mm automatic gun with BMP-1AM Basurmanin, BMP-2, BMP-3, BTR-82A, BMPT
      Mi-28N, Ka-52 are also on turntables, Su-25 attack aircraft have a 30-mm double-barreled gun
      cartridge 30x165 will sew Husky TSV, Iveco LMV - like cardboard for takeoff
  2. +10
    27 June 2022 07: 19
    Generally useless

    Kirill, everyone on this site already understood that any supply of NATO weapons to Ukraine is generally useless for you personally
    So why write these articles every two days?
    1. +3
      27 June 2022 07: 59
      Quote from kristal
      Generally useless

      Kirill, everyone on this site already understood that any supply of NATO weapons to Ukraine is generally useless for you personally
      So why write these articles every two days?

      Here Italy handed over Iveco LMV to Ukraine (we called them “lynxes”), I wonder when (and whether it will be at all) the author will declare the uselessness of this technique in the war ...
      1. +6
        27 June 2022 11: 47
        In general, a very good armored car - with mine protection and a powerful engine. And if he really showed himself well in Afghanistan (and there are still mountains and ... highlands), then he will feel good on the Ukrainian steppes.
        I would definitely not refuse such a trophy - it's cute and there is a place for luggage. The main thing is that they send more, then there will be no shortage of trophies.
        Quote: parma
        the author will declare the uselessness of this technique in war ...

        In war, any technique is useful. The main thing is to have it, and preferably more.
        Quote: parma
        Here Italy Ukraine Iveco LMV (we called them “lynxes”)

        Yes It will do the same, the main thing is that they don’t drag it along the rear - everything to the front, everything for the sake of trophies!
        1. 0
          27 June 2022 19: 46
          in the conditions of hostilities that are now taking place on the outskirts, these machines are good mainly for drape
          1. +3
            27 June 2022 23: 36
            It's true . But protection from bullets and shrapnel is also of considerable importance for movement in the frontline zone. Not all logs and ersatz screens can be attached to trucks.
    2. +4
      27 June 2022 13: 13
      The author is apparently one of those people who do not understand that both the M-16 and the outdated Mosinka are equally deadly if you hit it well. It is not the weapon that kills, it is the man who kills, and a well-trained man will kill the enemy, even armed with obsolete weapons.
  3. 0
    27 June 2022 09: 44
    Ukraine develops British Husky TSV armored vehicles
    and will have time to master before demilitarization?
    1. -1
      27 June 2022 11: 49
      They will have time, the war has not yet approached the equator, so let them send more - still not "Saxon" No. , the trophy will be valuable .
      The boys will definitely love it.
  4. 0
    27 June 2022 10: 12
    "Ukraine is mastering British armored vehicles" (?)
    Joe, did you hear? The Russians flew into space.
    - Is that all?!
    1. +1
      27 June 2022 19: 43
      an old joke about the Chinese, no need to distort
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +4
    27 June 2022 11: 49
    Generally useless

    Like Ryabov's "articles".
  7. +2
    27 June 2022 19: 41
    there is a saying that all British cars (land rovers) go either to a car repair or from a car repair
  8. +1
    27 June 2022 20: 00
    Good armored car for rides! Coming soon!
  9. +3
    27 June 2022 20: 11
    Some decisions on the armored car look quite good. A rolled-up awning is visible on the back sheet of circular armor on the roof, the optics next to the machine gun indicate the possibility of remote control of it, the cargo platform at the back also looks good, possibly allowing the awning to be used like on the good old UAZs.
  10. 0
    28 June 2022 09: 18
    After Georgia 2008, a certain amount of NATO equipment came to Us. Now, it seems, the whole NATO zoo is going to!)))
  11. -1
    28 June 2022 10: 02
    There is no reason to believe that such supplies will positively affect the state of the Ukrainian army.
    ...
    At the same time, such a machine suited the British army and did not cause any particular complaints during operation.

    In the course of work in Afghanistan, the Huskies showed themselves well and coped with the assigned work.

    Well, just don’t be like Arestovich! Any deliveries have a positive effect, the question is different - they only delay the defeat of Ukraine. Now it is not the Armed Forces that are dangerous, but the traitors in the leadership of our country.
    As for the "done well" - of course, the future belongs to MRAP. Our Tornadoes and Typhoons have proven themselves well and the fighters are asking for more of these machines.
  12. +1
    28 June 2022 10: 05
    I don’t understand why everyone is focusing on the uselessness of world arms supplies for Ukraine? If these supplies were not available, then Ukraine would have ended the war as quickly as Iraq, which was cut off from everything that was possible.