General Dynamics announces Abrams NextGen project

30

In the foreseeable future, the US Army plans to launch another modernization program for its main combat tanks M1A2 Abrams. In turn, the industry is working on ways to develop such equipment and creates new projects. So, the other day it became known about a similar project from General Dynamics Land Systems. Officially, it will be presented only in the fall, but the first promotional materials are already available.

New generation


A few days ago, GDLS launched a website dedicated to its new developments in the field of ground military equipment. Along with other projects, the site mentions for the first time a new tank upgrade option called the Abrams NextGen.



So far, we are only talking about the announcement and the start of an advertising campaign. The developer company revealed the fact of the existence of the project, and also published several spectacular videos showing a three-dimensional model of the upgraded MBT. Any features of the project or design characteristics are not mentioned.


The upper frontal part of the hull, the driver's hatch and the "lure" under the forehead of the tower

At the same time, commercials are accompanied by promising slogans: “Legend Mode: The Next Generation of Supremacy”, “Super Power. Cloak Not Included", "Brains and Muscles, a Deadly Combination", and "Silence Strike: They Won't Hear Us Coming".

The official presentation of the new project is scheduled for October 10 this year. It is going to be held as part of the next conference of the US Armed Forces Association. An obligatory component of such conferences is an exhibition of equipment and weapons, and often it becomes a platform for interesting premieres. One of the main novelties of this year is already known.

Army needs


Currently, in the interests of the US Army, serial modernization of cash MBT M1A2 is being carried out according to the current project System Enhancement Package v.3 (SEP v.3). Updated machines receive the designation M1A2C and return to service. Work on SEP v.3 will take a few more years, but the Pentagon is already working on the further development of tanks.

In the recent past, the development of the next tank modernization project was announced; while it is known as SEP v.4. It is assumed that in the course of such an upgrade, the MBT will receive all the updates of the previous project, as well as new systems and tools will be introduced.


Main weapon element

First of all, various components of the fire control system will be replaced. So, promising optical devices will be used, incl. thermal imagers. There will be funds for working with advanced programmable projectiles. Meteorological instruments will be replaced. It is also planned to improve network-centric capabilities through the introduction of new communication and control devices.

Which companies are involved in the development of SEP v.4 has not yet been reported. Probably, GDLS, which is directly related to the creation and development of the Abrams MBT, is also involved in this project. It can be assumed that the next version of the SEP project is hidden under the new Abrams NextGen cipher. Whether this is so will become known only in the future, when the Pentagon and GDLS will disclose new information about promising developments.

Noticeable differences


So far, GDLS has shown only a three-dimensional model of the upgraded Abrams NextGen. At the same time, in commercials, the tank is not shown in full, and only individual structural elements and units consistently fall into the frame. In addition, some parts and assemblies are simply not shown. However, such advertising allows you to determine some of the features of the project.


One of the roof hatches and part of the combat module

First of all, it is clear that the Abrams NextGen project does not provide for a radical restructuring of the existing tank. The overall architecture and layout will remain the same. Apparently, the armor of the hull and turret will correspond to the latest modernization projects. In this case, it is possible to introduce active protection to complement the armor.

A part of the barrel with the characteristic holes of the muzzle brake fell into the frame, which indicates the replacement of the gun. The regular 120-mm M256 cannon can be replaced by a promising product of the same caliber XM360 or its modern modification. Whether they are going to supplement the gun with an automatic loader, as in previous projects with the XM360, is unclear.

On the roof of the simulated turret there are two panoramic sights for the gunner and the commander. In their appearance, they are similar to the French Safran PASEO products. Such sights are intended for all-round observation, searching for targets at an increased range and subsequent firing at them. Probably, new devices from the SLA will also appear inside the fighting compartment.

Also on the roof of the tower, but closer to the stern, there is a remotely controlled weapon station. The 6D model is similar to the real Protector RS30 from the Norwegian company Kongsberg. The module carries a 230mm M914 autocannon or its lightweight XMXNUMX variant, as well as a normal caliber machine gun. The module has its own optics.


30 mm cannon and 7,62 mm machine gun on DBM

Main trends


A few months remain before the official presentation of the Abrams NextGen project. However, it is already generally clear how exactly GDLS proposes to develop the existing tank, and what characteristics will be improved in the first place. At the same time, one should not be surprised if the project actually provides for other positive changes.

It is easy to see that the main changes in the announced project affect the weapons complex. For the first time in a long time, a replacement of the main gun is proposed. As always, the SLA is undergoing a major update, and a new combat module with a small-caliber weapons.

With the successful implementation of all these ideas, the upgraded tank will be able to observe and detect targets at a greater distance. This will increase the effective range of fire with different ammunition. In addition, the flexibility of combat use will increase. Depending on the type of target detected, the MBT will be able to use more than just a 120mm gun or machine gun. For "intermediate" purposes, a 30 mm gun is now offered.

Much attention is now being paid to improving the means of communication and control. In previous materials on the ways of upgrading the M1A2 from GDLS, the possibility of introducing new tools and instruments for faster and more efficient data exchange with the command post and / or other combat vehicles was mentioned. In addition, it is possible to equip the tank with its own reconnaissance UAV. Which of these ideas went into the Abrams NextGen project is unknown.


Sensor or camera on the tank

Having received a number of advantages, the new Abrams NextGen can save the problems of its predecessors. The main one is a decrease in mobility and mobility. GDLS does not report what will happen to the power plant and chassis of the tank, and in addition, does not specify the estimated combat weight. It is quite possible that as a result of the next modernization, the tank will become heavier again. However, another scenario cannot be ruled out. In the new project, measures to reduce weight and / or increase power density may finally appear.

Upgraded instead of new


The M1A2 MBT upgraded according to the new project will be presented only in October, but for now you have to be content with only a few promotional materials. They show that GDLS plans to continue the systematic development of the existing design. Its characteristics will be improved due to the successive replacement of components and assemblies.

With a favorable development of events, the GDLS Abrams NextGen project will become the basis of the SEP v.4 program and will determine the development of the American tank fleet for the next few years. The ground forces will once again be able to upgrade their equipment, which will give them obvious advantages. However, the production and purchase of new M1A2 tanks, as with the latest upgrades, are not planned.

In addition, the development and future implementation of the SEP v.4 project shows the difficult situation of the Pentagon. He does not yet have the capacity to create and mass-produce a new next-generation tank. And until such a prototype appears, GDLS and other contractors will have to create the next projects of the SEP series, which have various advantages and face objective limitations.


Promotional video of the new project
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    20 June 2022 06: 25
    As an advertisement.
    Officially, it will be presented only in the fall, but the first promotional materials are already available.
  2. +4
    20 June 2022 06: 30
    How many such projects did the USA have: FCS tank, AET electric tank or FMBT-E, MCS XM1202.
    In addition, it is possible to equip the tank with its own reconnaissance UAV.

    I remember the MCS tank could effectively shoot from closed positions at a distance of up to 12 km using drones. Interestingly, is such an opportunity provided for in the new tank?
    1. +1
      20 June 2022 21: 21
      I remember the MCS tank could effectively shoot from closed positions at a distance of up to 12 km

      good option,
      otherwise the events in Ukraine showed that basically tanks do not howl with tanks
      and we fly to them mainly from above from artillery (90%) and MLRS (5%)
      only 5% - tank duels, which again turn into artillery strikes on tanks
      1. 0
        4 August 2022 21: 09
        ... Abrams on the fields of Ukraine, with its weight, is generally motionless ...
        1. 0
          5 August 2022 10: 01
          so it should only be used in the city
          1. 0
            5 August 2022 10: 49
            ... a tank in the city? ... well, well ...
        2. 0
          9 August 2022 07: 57
          I traveled across the sands request
          For a fight in the city, an additional body kit is put on him, “in the field” he is easier. The caterpillars are wider than on the T72, the specific power is higher (GTE by 1500 hp).
          A dangerous machine, it can use modern BOPS and OFS with programmable detonation, it has an advanced control system, a commander's panoramic sight, etc.
          1. -1
            20 August 2022 15: 04
            Quote: 3danimal
            The tracks are wider than on the T72, the specific power is higher (

            So and weight have him be-be. Naturally, the machine is serious, especially in defense.
  3. -7
    20 June 2022 06: 35
    Mattresses continue the Hollywood style, and at the same time cut into modernization, thereby automatically falling behind for a generation.
    And according to the meaning of this bodyagi. Guys, are you even catching up that if you stick a tower from an armored personnel carrier onto an already overweight carcass ... With a cannon ... Not a single bridge or pontoon will withstand this mammoth. Do you generally catch up with the fact that, for example, on a theater in a tribolt, if he gets up, he will slowly sink into the ground?
    1. -4
      20 June 2022 07: 58
      Quote: Cowbra
      Mattresses continue the Hollywood style, and at the same time cut into modernization, thereby automatically falling behind for a generation.
      And according to the meaning of this bodyagi. Guys, are you even catching up that if you stick a tower from an armored personnel carrier onto an already overweight carcass ... With a cannon ... Not a single bridge or pontoon will withstand this mammoth. Do you generally catch up with the fact that, for example, on a theater in a tribolt, if he gets up, he will slowly sink into the ground?

      Stories about big and heavy tanks are no longer in vogue after the advent of the Armata, which is fatter than Abrams.
      1. +7
        20 June 2022 12: 30
        Fatter?? Weight T14 in the region of 51-53t. Abrams up to 70t. And where is fatter.
  4. +4
    20 June 2022 08: 43
    Quote: BlackMokona
    Stories about big and heavy tanks are no longer in vogue after the advent of Almaty, which is fatter than Abrams

    Weight of Almaty - UP TO 55 tons, go where you went with your fairy tales
    1. +3
      20 June 2022 09: 36
      Quote: Cowbra
      Quote: BlackMokona
      Stories about big and heavy tanks are no longer in vogue after the advent of Almaty, which is fatter than Abrams

      Weight of Almaty - UP TO 55 tons, go where you went with your fairy tales

      Of course up to 55 tons. Despite the fact that its width, height and length is greater than that of Abrams. The balloon is no different. wassat
      1. +1
        20 June 2022 12: 33
        Look at the 3rd generation Abrams. What and how is it inflated. In new tanks, all hinged armor is made built-in, hence the dimensions. The 3rd generation is already under 70 tons ... and the Germans and the French stubbornly want to install another 130-140mm gun.
        1. 0
          20 June 2022 18: 41
          Well, Abrams also has more internal empty space. because there is more than one person in the crew.
          Also, if it is built-in, then the layout is denser, which means more tons per cubic meter.
          1. 0
            20 June 2022 19: 43
            Well, on Armata it was made by Western standards .... And a cart with 7 rollers ... and that’s all and people are sitting below. And Abrams is not the leader in security, despite + 10 tons ..... Even in comparison with the T90
            1. +1
              21 June 2022 08: 09
              Quote: Zaurbek
              Well, on Armata it was made by Western standards .... And a cart with 7 rollers ... and that’s all and people are sitting below. And Abrams is not the leader in security, despite + 10 tons ..... Even in comparison with the T90

              We are not discussing which tank is better here, here I have huge doubts that Armata weighs so little. With a denser layout, less empty internal volume and large dimensions in all three axes.
              1. +1
                21 June 2022 08: 47
                T14 is already a tank according to Western habitability standards, MTO power and extra weight reserves. Western modernization in size will also not decrease. This is a new standard for MBT dimensions. I to this. For armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, everything is the same. The main conflicts are now local .... people must be protected.
                1. 0
                  21 June 2022 16: 23
                  Quote: Zaurbek
                  T14 is already a tank according to Western habitability standards, MTO power and extra weight reserves. Western modernization in size will also not decrease. This is a new standard for MBT dimensions. I to this. For armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, everything is the same. The main conflicts are now local .... people must be protected.

                  Even with the same standards, there are simply fewer people in it by one person.
                  1. 0
                    21 June 2022 16: 26
                    Yes ... but the protection is higher .... more armor + a margin of 152mm.
  5. 0
    20 June 2022 09: 12
    I don’t know how it will be with the tank ... time will tell ... but the next budget will definitely be mastered ...
    1. +1
      20 June 2022 11: 09
      So this is their budget and should we worry about it
  6. +4
    20 June 2022 15: 40
    It seems that in the USA all marketers work according to the same training manual when creating commercials - for iPhone and for Abrams.
    1. +1
      20 June 2022 20: 23
      And Chinese phone companies imitate such advertisements :))
    2. 0
      21 June 2022 04: 40
      And the Russians choke with envy that they can, but they don’t.
      1. 0
        28 July 2022 19: 32
        What can? Nothing is clear? Stupid and pretentious advertising? What's the point? What is this ad for? Nobody buys Abrams anyway.
  7. 0
    20 June 2022 19: 37
    In light of the closure of the last US tank factory in Lima, Ohio, sounds too promising. It is unlikely that it will go further than presentations, given the priorities of the Yankees: first the fleet and aviation. And with the fleet they are not so hot now.
  8. +1
    21 June 2022 13: 25
    I know it's more of those times, but I'd like to see something similar around.

    good
    1. +2
      23 June 2022 13: 01
      Modern version of Stug? SAU-Tank?
      1. +1
        23 June 2022 14: 05
        That's right, I understand that it makes no sense to make a tank without a turret from scratch. However, as in World War II, old tanks could be restored by equipping them with more powerful guns that could not be mounted in a turret. For example, Leopard 1 with the new Giat 140mm gun or Rheinmetall 130mm. The problem for us enthusiasts is that we would like a new station wagon every year as car enthusiasts. Fortunately, there are rotated machines that can be produced in several countries, otherwise it would be sad. smile