Complex intelligence, control and communications "Sagittarius-M"

49

Working with a tablet from the composition of the "Sagittarius". On the shoulder of the fighter - the antenna of the navigation system

The effectiveness of the use of modern weapons, including high-precision systems, directly depends on the quality of reconnaissance and target designation. The Russian army solves such problems with the help of a wide range of various systems and complexes. In particular, the Sagittarius-M intelligence, control and communications complex (KRUS) is intended for ground formations. Right now, it is once again being used as part of the Special Operation and ensures the fulfillment of combat missions.

For aviation


About the use of KRUS "Sagittarius-M" in the Special Operation on June 7 told RIA News. Referring to its source in unnamed circles, the news agency revealed some details of the use of the complex as a modern and effective means for searching for targets and aiming weapons.



It is reported that with the help of "Streltsa-M" ground reconnaissance units search for enemy targets, the detection of which from the air is difficult. Then the target coordinates are transmitted to front-line aircraft aviation to strike. In this case, the strike can be carried out by aviation independently or with the direct participation of ground reconnaissance.

Target designation is transmitted to a fighter or bomber in an automated mode. While receiving data, the aircraft may be at a safe distance and not enter the enemy air defense zone.


The Sagittarius-M complex can directly participate in the strike. When using missiles with a semi-active laser seeker, such as Kh-29L or Kh-58ML, KRUS is used to illuminate the target. The laser rangefinder-target designator illuminates the found target, and the missile is aimed at the reflected radiation. This method of combat work allows you to attack objects at the forefront and in the depths of enemy formations. Provides high accuracy of defeat - the deviation from the aiming point does not exceed 2-3 m.

The RIA Novosti source spoke only about the joint work of ground reconnaissance and combat aviation. At the same time, it is known that KRUS "Sagittarius-M" can carry out reconnaissance in the interests of other forces and means. According to information from scouts with such a complex, plans for motorized rifle units, artillery, etc. can be drawn up and adjusted.

The Ministry of Defense has not yet commented on reports of the use of Strelts-M. At the same time, it regularly publishes video footage of the destruction of various enemy targets. It is obvious that a significant part of these strikes became possible thanks to the work of ground reconnaissance units equipped with modern KRUS.

Intelligence and management


The promising KRUS "Sagittarius" was developed by Russian industry in the 2007s. After carrying out all the necessary tests and refinement, in XNUMX it was put into service, and soon full-scale deliveries of serial products began. The production of the equipment of the complex was entrusted to the Radioavionika enterprise and a number of subcontractors. The kits were supplied to the ground forces, primarily to military intelligence units.


Command computer

In the future, the existing KRUS was upgraded. It was updated and redesigned for inclusion in the advanced combat equipment "Warrior". This version of the complex was called "Sagittarius-M" and was also put into service. According to known data, in recent years the army has been receiving the KRUS with the letter "M".

Units equipped with two versions of the Streltsy regularly participated in exercises of various sizes. In the course of these activities, methods of using new equipment were worked out in solving the entire range of anticipated tasks. With the help of KRUS, the interaction of units was ensured, and a search for targets was carried out, followed by guidance of aviation and artillery on them.

After 2015, "Sagittarius-M" was tested by practice during the Syrian operation. With its help, Russian intelligence officers kept in touch and exchanged data, incl. with combat units of other branches of the armed forces. So, in a combat situation, new opportunities for interaction with army and front-line aviation were tested.

Right now, KRUS "Sagittarius-M" and equipment "Warrior" again show their capabilities and help Russian fighters solve various problems. It should be noted that this time we have to deal with a more developed enemy, who has a full-fledged army with a variety of equipment. This complicates the work of scouts with the Sagittarius-M, but they successfully cope with it.

Complex intelligence, control and communications "Sagittarius-M"

Soldier's computer

Toolkit


KRUS "Sagittarius-M" is a set of tools and devices for various purposes, suitable for placement on the equipment of a soldier. Depending on the position and specialty, a fighter receives one or another set of devices. In total, eight configuration options are provided: for the commander, for the radio operator, operators of various systems, etc.

In all versions, "Sagittarius-M" includes a container with a power system, a container for the main electronic equipment, a satellite and inertial navigation module, communications equipment and a headset, as well as cables for connecting all modules. The unit commander receives a TT-type tablet computer. Simplified tablets of the "AK" type are intended for ordinary fighters. Computers are used to map the area and exchange tactical information. The commander has the ability to monitor the position and work of his subordinates, as well as send commands or receive intelligence data. Data exchange is carried out automatically via a secure channel at distances of at least 1,5 km.

The KRUS kit for the radio operator includes the R-853-V2M radio station, with the help of which the commander maintains contact with other units and higher command. For reconnaissance, the Strelts-M includes a PDU-4 rangefinder optical device on a tripod and a small-sized SBR-5M Fara-VR radar. Fighters-operators monitor the situation, detect targets and transmit data about them to the commander.

Clear benefits


Within the framework of one unit, KRUS "Strelets-M" actually forms a full-fledged information and control system with all the obvious advantages. In addition, such a complex allows you to fully connect the unit to the Unified Tactical Control System for interaction with other forces and means.


A soldier conducts surveillance and searches for targets

All the available communication options can be used in several ways. First of all, they allow you to increase the potential of the unit itself. Together with information from all available sources, the commander gets the opportunity to more effectively manage his subordinates. The same applies to the fighters, who receive all the necessary data.

It also simplifies reconnaissance. Using the regular means of "Streltsa-M", the unit can find the necessary object, determine its coordinates with high accuracy and immediately transfer them to artillery or aviation. It also simplifies the adjustment of fire. Such reconnaissance and strike circuits, based on modern components and solutions, are distinguished by their speed and increase the overall effectiveness of the combat work of troops.

It is important that KRUS "Sagittarius-M" is not the only modern domestic intelligence tool. A variety of other types of systems can be used to search for enemy targets and target designation - unmanned aerial vehicles, ground reconnaissance vehicles, etc. In each specific situation, a complex that most fully corresponds to its conditions can be used.

Confirmed by practice


Thus, the development of the Russian army in recent years has been carried out not only through new weapons, but also with the help of promising means of reconnaissance, control and communications. One of the main developments in this direction was the KRUS "Sagittarius" in the basic and upgraded versions, which gives the fighters new opportunities.

The potential of the new systems has been repeatedly demonstrated during various exercises, and in recent years it has been used in real operations. News and reports from Syria and Ukraine show that Sagittarius-M and its users are up to the task. In doing so, they successfully contribute to the achievement of global goals.
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    10 June 2022 04: 54
    News and reports from Syria and Ukraine show that Sagittarius-M and its users are up to the task. In doing so, they successfully contribute to the achievement of global goals.

    Still, the use of these or similar complexes would have led to the impossibility of shelling the territory of the Russian Federation by "non-brothers", then they "would not have been worth it."
  2. +5
    10 June 2022 05: 03
    Thus, the development of the Russian army in recent years has been carried out not only through new weapons

    Good words, right. Only in / in Ukraine I see BMP-1, manufactured in 67, not even modernized, I see the absence of tactical reconnaissance UAVs (at least quadrocopters). Complete silence about the counter-battery radar. Old self-propelled guns.
    ....... but also with the help of promising means of intelligence, control and communications. One of the main developments in this direction was the KRUS "Sagittarius" in the basic and modernized versions, which gives the fighters new opportunities.

    If you don’t watch the video from there, a cry for help, give us a normal connection. Volunteers buy ordinary tourist radio stations and send them to our guys.
    Where is all this described, so cool and necessary? Or again, noodles on the ears, the lack of money is not all at once, we are working.
    1. +2
      10 June 2022 05: 26
      Quote: 28st region
      Only in / in Ukraine I see the BMP-1, the release of 67, not even modernized
      How many of them do you see? Of course there are single shots, but they are just not visible on the front end! Well, about 67 years of non-modernized, this is of course tin, what, right with the "Baby" above the cannon ?! By the way, the footage from the repair stations of the BMP-1 is not shown anywhere, well, except for the L / DPR and the Ukrainian ones, and this is an indicator!
      Quote: 28st region
      Complete silence about the counter-battery radar. Old self-propelled guns.
      This is for journalists, "Tornados, Hurricanes and Iskanders cover their eyes, they either don’t reach the counter-battery fight, or they’re smart. And the old self-propelled guns, so they are all old, Msta-S 86. That’s just modernization was carried out and repeated. Just judging by your "even non-modernized", you did not see this.
      Quote: 28st region
      money is not all at once, we are working.
      Exactly!
      1. 0
        10 June 2022 05: 32
        The first one went to explain the explanations.
        1. -1
          10 June 2022 06: 58
          Quote: 28st region
          The first one went to explain the explanations.

          Are there any objections to the BMP-1 of 67? And on other points...
          1. +1
            10 June 2022 07: 11
            Are there any objections to the BMP-1 of 67?

            There is a BMP-1 in the frames, there is already a T-62.
            1. -4
              10 June 2022 07: 30
              Quote: ramzay21
              There is a BMP-1 in the frames, there is already a T-62.
              T-62 RF Armed Forces? BMP-1 straight from 1967?

              Quote: Vladimir_2U
              Well, about 67 years old, not modernized, this is of course tin, what, right with the "Baby" above the cannon ?!

              Quote: Vladimir_2U
              Of course there are single shots, but they are just not visible on the front end!
              1. +4
                10 June 2022 08: 45
                T-62 RF Armed Forces?
                no damn ... the Republic of Burkina Faso)
                BMP-1 straight from 1967?
                No 2015 release!)))
                It’s not dumb for you sometimes to give out something like that, to cling to words?) You might think if the BMP-1 of 1983 was released, it would cease to be an antediluvian bucket of bolts?
                1. -4
                  10 June 2022 09: 18
                  Quote: Sanguinius
                  no damn ... the Republic of Burkina Faso)

                  Hahaha, Petrosyan is proud of you. LDNR handed them over!
                  Quote: Sanguinius
                  Isn’t it dumb for you sometimes to give out something like that, to cling to words?
                  It's dumb to write nonsense.
                  Quote: Sanguinius
                  You might think if the 1 BMP-1983 would have been, it would have ceased to be an antediluvian bucket of bolts?
                  If you at least understood something, you would know that even then the BMP-1 was equipped with the Fagot ATGM instead of the Baby, which is a cut above and smoke grenade launchers.
                  But if you are stupid, then you will not see the difference.
                  1. 0
                    11 June 2022 10: 42
                    Hahaha, Petrosyan is proud of you. LDNR handed them over!
                    Thank you for appreciating my joke) Well, since the LDNR was transferred, we can sleep peacefully))
                    But if you're stupid, then you can't see the difference

                    Wai, wai, how formidable we are, but I’ll just repeat, from the fact that one or another ATGM, BMP-1, which is a development of the 60s (specifically BMP-1), was twisted to him, it doesn’t stop doing this with a bucket of bolts, it doesn’t matter , how much you are trying to puff out your cheeks, there is absolutely no difference. They are still in the army, and this one is not good.
                    1. 0
                      11 June 2022 16: 24
                      Quote: Sanguinius
                      Thank you for appreciating my joke) Well, since the LDNR was transferred, we can sleep peacefully))
                      Then there is no need to lament that the T-62 is used in the Russian Army.

                      Quote: Sanguinius
                      BMP-1, which is a development of the 60s (specifically BMP-1
                      It seems to be a discovery for you how much technology developed in the 60-70s and even 50s is in service with the United States and Europe. But for some reason, a bucket of nuts BMP-1.
              2. +3
                10 June 2022 09: 40
                BMP-1 straight from 1967?

                Most likely not, but the BMP-1 does not cease to be the BMP-1
                T-62 RF Armed Forces?

                I can't say for sure, but there are pictures on the Internet. I saw a photo with a T-62M echelon and honestly thought it was to reinforce checkpoints, or second defense echelons, which is generally reasonable. But I saw a photo with a T-62M column with ATGM umbrellas and they are clearly not for checkpoints.
                1. 0
                  5 January 2023 12: 46
                  Dear ... and what equipment are you going to resist on Upyrin? The T-62M is not much inferior in its capabilities to the T-64 and T-72A, and given the experience of using the T-62M in SARatov, where the T-62M was used as a CAO for direct infantry support, this is quite a good option for strengthening motorized rifle units!
          2. +3
            10 June 2022 10: 36
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            Are there any objections to the BMP-1 of 67?

            Shilka also flashed there, she is definitely older than 67 years old.
            1. 0
              11 June 2022 16: 49
              Quote: qqqq
              Shilka also flashed there, she is definitely older than 67 years old.
              Even those that were released in 82? There were several upgrades, MSA, radar and optics, both in production and in the troops. Shilka of the first issue and the last one differ no less than the BMP-1 and BMP-2
              1. -1
                11 June 2022 20: 10
                Quote: Vladimir_2U
                Shilka of the first issue and the last one differ no less than the BMP-1 and BMP-2

                Not sure how much different. If the PKK was transferred to a number (which is unlikely, 23 mm is not enough), then yes, but if they left the old one, then either 82 or 67. one legacy installation. As far as I know, the whole difference is that they added a needle, like they made a ZRAK instead of a ZAK. The gun on the Shilka is not a fountain, the short range of a direct shot, large dispersion and a 23 mm caliber are still small. The base does not cope with the load, it is good for 10 tons, but when the tower was piled up with 10 additional tons, it became very sad and Shilka did not keep up with the tanks on the march.
                1. 0
                  12 June 2022 06: 48
                  Quote: qqqq
                  what is 82g., what is 67g. one legacy installation.

                  Improved radar electronics and optics give a noticeable increase in performance. B-52 will not let you lie.
                  Quote: qqqq
                  The gun on the Shilka is not a fountain, the short range of a direct shot, large dispersion and a 23 mm caliber are still small. The base does not cope with the load, it is good for 10 tons, but when the tower was piled up with 10 additional tons, it became very sad and Shilka did not keep up with the tanks on the march.
                  Yes, the main reason for obsolescence is the caliber, or rather the short reach, and the rest is a trifle. As soon as Apaches with Hellfires appeared, the range to the launch line was stupidly lacking, and even now few people can shoot down every missile with guns. And in the fields of Tunguska and Thor, too, they don’t really jump.
                  1. 0
                    12 June 2022 22: 51
                    Quote: Vladimir_2U
                    Improved radar electronics and optics give a noticeable increase in performance. B-52 will not let you lie.
                    Quote: qqqq

                    The B-52 was brought down in Vietnam just the first release with an analog RPK. A cardinal improvement is the replacement of analog electronics with digital ones, I didn’t read that this was done otherwise, it’s the same as painting with new paint, about the same result.
                    Quote: Vladimir_2U
                    And in the fields of Tunguska and Thor, too, they don’t really jump.

                    As for Tunguska, in vain, the base there, compared to Shilka, is just a song. I can’t say anything about Thor, but worse than Shilka, with regards to the base, it’s hardly possible.
                    1. 0
                      13 June 2022 06: 27
                      Quote: qqqq
                      The B-52 was brought down in Vietnam just the first release with an analog RPK.

                      Shilka?! The B-52 was just a very difficult target, with support, of course, for both air defense systems and MiGs. By the way, the most recent B-52 is 62 years old and nothing. A question of tactics.
                      Quote: qqqq
                      As for Tunguska, in vain, the base there, compared to Shilka, is just a song.
                      Well, even if the mass is 1,7 more, and the engine is 2,5 times more powerful, with a much more complex and efficient suspension. However, there is such a limitation in mobility as structural strength, and here the Tunguska with rocket blocks, cannons on the sides of the tower and massive radars in no way surpasses the compact Shilka.
                      1. +1
                        13 June 2022 09: 19
                        When I served on Shilka, we were told a fable that in Vietnam there were cases of B-52s being destroyed when they were descending to low altitude. As for the Shilka base, don’t say anything, the level of the 50s, you can only sympathize with the mechanics. Given the level of electronics, base and comfort, they looked at Tungska with outright envy. Unfortunately, Shilka in all respects is the level of the late 50s and early 60s, where she still remains.
                      2. 0
                        13 June 2022 09: 55
                        Quote: qqqq
                        Unfortunately, Shilka in all respects is the level of the late 50s and early 60s, where she still remains.

                        The question of tactics of application. As they say: in a fight, the balalaika is a percussion instrument! laughing
        2. 0
          10 June 2022 07: 09
          Quote: 28st region
          The first one went to explain the explanations.

          When you watch a video on YouTube about Ukraine, open your second eye sometimes.
      2. +1
        10 June 2022 06: 24
        Quote: 28st region
        money is not all at once, we are working.
        Exactly!

        Yes, at such a pace, by the end of the century, we will have an army of the level of 2022 ....
        It is not necessary to work, but to produce and arm, and so you can work aimlessly indefinitely
      3. +4
        10 June 2022 11: 43
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        Well, about 67 years old, not modernized, this is of course tin, what, right with the "Baby" above the cannon ?!

        In the well-known video of the Ministry of Defense about the columns near Kyiv, the first of the BMP-1s is very similar to the non-modernized one - apart from the "Baby" launcher, there are no other launchers above the cannon.
        1. +1
          11 June 2022 16: 20
          Quote: Alexey RA
          In the well-known video of the Ministry of Defense about the columns near Kyiv, the first of the BMP-1s is very similar to the non-modernized one - apart from the "Baby" launcher, there are no other launchers above the cannon.

          Launchers "Fagot" are removable, and the guide for the Baby is difficult to see with confidence.
        2. +1
          11 June 2022 17: 07
          Quote: Alexey RA
          except for the "Baby" launcher, there are no other launchers above the cannon.

          But no, in your old comment I watched the video, the PU is definitely visible, and it doesn’t look like an analogue of KTD-1 at all hi . BUT, the artachs in the state mention BMP-1, while not PRP, they can! laughing
  3. -4
    10 June 2022 05: 25

    Teex. It looks like the level of Vin 95 has been reached by our military. Now the rest is to pull up the internal interface of this Sagittarius M to the level comfortable for the user.
    Indeed, in fact, both Win 95 and Win 10 perform the same functions, only the difference in interface (user comfort) between them is an abyss.
    So here, engineers have developed one designed for their level of development, now it remains to adapt the shell (interface) for a simple user (ordinary fighter) who does not have a higher education.
    1. -1
      10 June 2022 06: 04
      Quote: lucul
      adapt the shell (interface) for a simple user (ordinary fighter) who does not have a higher education.

      The soldier is also a very trainable creature. And for this, there are educational units in which today outfits for the kitchen have been replaced by a curriculum.
    2. +5
      10 June 2022 10: 21
      Quote: lucul
      adapt the shell (interface) for a simple user (ordinary fighter)

      Do you think that it is possible to work with this equipment without training? You yourself can work with a rangefinder and target designator, not to mention the radar included in this complex, at least somehow without training. This is a complex, not a smartphone. Do not confuse soft with warm.
    3. -2
      10 June 2022 10: 38
      Quote: lucul
      Indeed, in fact, both Win 95 and Win 10 perform the same functions, only the difference in interface (user comfort) between them is an abyss.

      That's for sure, at 10 the concept of comfort is completely absent.
  4. 0
    10 June 2022 05: 50
    Quote: lucul
    it remains to adapt the shell (interface) for a simple user (ordinary fighter) who does not have a higher education

    I beg you, our youth who walks buried in the phone .... for her this is not a question
  5. +7
    10 June 2022 06: 14
    Several photographs and diagrams explaining the work of "Sagittarius-M"

    Computer screen KRUS "Strelets" with aircraft going to the target and receiving target designation

    Structural diagram of the Sagittarius complex

    Laser rangefinder PDU-4
  6. +2
    10 June 2022 07: 17
    The MO learned to make fairy tales and cartoons, there is a whole division sitting there and a lot of money is spent on it. And for some reason, caring citizens buy walkie-talkies, UAVs, thermal imagers and other achievements of modern civilization. Maybe instead of fairy tales, the MO will begin to deal with its direct duties.
    1. -1
      10 June 2022 07: 35
      Quote: ramzay21
      The MO learned to make fairy tales and cartoons, there is a whole division sitting there and a lot of money is spent on it. And for some reason, caring citizens buy walkie-talkies, UAVs, thermal imagers and other achievements of modern civilization. Maybe instead of fairy tales, the MO will begin to deal with its direct duties.

      For a banal reason - the fathers-commanders of the units, as a financially responsible person, often do not issue regular funds to the fighters, otherwise they will lose or break them, and then answer them ... a week ago, the Ukrainians captured the commander's infantry fighting vehicle, they found a company magazine, almost the entire company set of radio stations, thermal imagers and nightlights ... and this is at the very front ...
      1. +2
        10 June 2022 10: 45
        fathers-commanders of units, as a financially responsible person, often do not issue regular funds to fighters, otherwise they will lose or break them, and then answer them

        in a war, no one asks about material values. Do not drive a blizzard
        1. +3
          10 June 2022 12: 06
          Quote: glory1974
          in a war, no one asks about material values. Do not drive a blizzard

          Pomnitsa, in his memoirs on Afghanistan, he met complaints that it was extremely hemorrhoids to write off the equipment lost in battles. They joked that it is strange that the testimony of the dushmans who knocked out the car is not required from us.
          1. 0
            14 June 2022 11: 08
            to write off the equipment lost in battles was extremely hemorrhoids

            Bureaucracy yes, and now certainly exists. In addition to explanatory notes, photos have long been required to be attached to documents. But I have never heard that money was calculated for equipment destroyed in battle.
        2. +4
          10 June 2022 15: 00
          Quote: glory1974
          fathers-commanders of units, as a financially responsible person, often do not issue regular funds to fighters, otherwise they will lose or break them, and then answer them

          in a war, no one asks about material values. Do not drive a blizzard

          There is no war;
          1. 0
            14 June 2022 11: 13
            [quote] There is no war, there is NWO [/ quote]
            Definition for lawyers. For the military, this is the conduct of hostilities and the corresponding use of forces and means.
            [quote] You are naive if you think that they don’t ask ... [/ quote]
            I'm not naive. I experienced it on my own skin.
            [quote] how to determine then a competent and illiterate commander, if not by the loss of personnel and material property? ... [quote]
            They are determined by a combination of factors, and the decisive factor is the fulfillment of a combat mission. At the beginning of the SVO, there was a lot of video of abandoned equipment, without fuel, or stuck in the mud. They abandoned equipment on orders, because it was necessary to go further. That is, everything was in accordance with the task.
  7. -1
    10 June 2022 07: 50
    Eh...
    Would you drink honey with your mouth ...
  8. +3
    10 June 2022 09: 20
    The author shows complete inconsistency and ignorance of the subject, which is what half of the photos from the previous version of KRUS write about, modernized here and not close. The only PDU. The other half of the developments that did not go to the supply, because they went in parallel. The history of the subject has no coincidence, some notions sucked from the finger. Some nodes were never included in the kits that the author describes.

    In general, it seems to be true, but there is nothing nearby
    1. -2
      10 June 2022 10: 46
      The author shows complete inconsistency and ignorance of the subject, which is what half of the photos from the previous version of KRUS write about, modernized here and not close.

      I think he is doing the right thing by not revealing the details. Why does the enemy need to reveal all the cards?
  9. -1
    10 June 2022 10: 45
    Quote: riwas
    Several photographs and diagrams explaining the work of "Sagittarius-M"

    Computer screen KRUS "Strelets" with aircraft going to the target and receiving target designation

    Structural diagram of the Sagittarius complex

    Laser rangefinder PDU-4


    The structural diagram is not complete. Remote control right, left left
  10. +5
    10 June 2022 10: 48
    Quote: lucul

    Teex. It looks like the level of Vin 95 has been reached by our military. Now the rest is to pull up the internal interface of this Sagittarius M to the level comfortable for the user.
    Indeed, in fact, both Win 95 and Win 10 perform the same functions, only the difference in interface (user comfort) between them is an abyss.
    So here, engineers have developed one designed for their level of development, now it remains to adapt the shell (interface) for a simple user (ordinary fighter) who does not have a higher education.


    Only this product has nothing to do with Sagittarius. In response to your remark, the soldier works on his own in two days. Then there is no limit to perfection.
    1. +1
      10 June 2022 12: 34
      It's a pity the iron is not ours. Watering can is the main manufacturer .... but maybe they order it somewhere. The basis is a tablet for topographic survey.
  11. +1
    10 June 2022 15: 27
    Minus: imported Leica tablet included in the kit.
    Well, it's kind of cumbersome.
    Soviet microcircuits were the largest in the world, now also? request
  12. +3
    10 June 2022 16: 34
    if our troops have such equipment, then it is not clear why the volunteers are asking for money to buy elementary ones! Chinese! quadcopters?? Where are these "Archers" and other front-line communications, Has the war in Syria really taught us nothing?
  13. 0
    12 June 2022 23: 57
    Right now, KRUS "Sagittarius-M" and equipment "Warrior" again show their capabilities and help Russian fighters solve various problems. It should be noted that this time we have to deal with a more developed enemy, who has a full-fledged army with a variety of equipment. This complicates the work of scouts with the Sagittarius-M, but they successfully cope with it.


    Wow...
    right now and they are doing well...
    but there are proofs, how "they help Russian fighters solve various tasks" and "they successfully cope"?
    or like Konoshenko - to take a word?
    and then, no matter how you read the news from the fields, it’s a complete crap ... with this "security" that has no world analogues ...
  14. 0
    7 October 2022 09: 32
    Interestingly, is there at least one unit in the zone (not specialists and intelligence, but ordinary infantry) that would successfully use this complex daily? Our guys really need an integrated identification system for their alien. All these white bandages, of course, kapets collective farm