Spanish air defense systems Spada / Skyguard Aspide for the Ukrainian army

35
Spanish air defense systems Spada / Skyguard Aspide for the Ukrainian army

Launch of the Aspide missile by the Spada / Skyguard complex. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of Spain

Spain expressed its readiness to transfer part of its Spada / Skyguard Aspide anti-aircraft missile systems to the Ukrainian army. Now the last negotiations and consultations are underway, according to the results of which it is planned to start shipping the equipment to the recipient in the near future. SAMs are being delivered as another measure of military-technical assistance. At the same time, the potential of such assistance is seriously limited by a number of objective factors, and it will actually be useless.

Old new rockets


Since February, Spain has sent military aid to Ukraine several times in the form of infantry weapons, ammunition, protective equipment, etc. More powerful weapons and military equipment have not yet been transferred. However, on June 5, the Spanish edition of El Pais reported that now the Kyiv regime will be provided with armored vehicles, artillery and missile systems, as well as help with the training of personnel.



According to the publication, at the end of April, the Ukrainian leadership, when meeting with the Spanish authorities, asked for Tanks, missile systems, artillery, etc. Madrid agreed to provide such assistance, but its shipment was postponed indefinitely due to the complexity of the situation and difficulties in logistics. In early June, the topic of armored vehicles and missile weapons was again raised at the highest level. And only after that it became known about the upcoming deliveries.

El Pais, citing its sources, reports that in the near future Ukraine will receive a Spada / Skyguard Aspide air defense system and ammunition for it from the presence of the Spanish army. In addition, the supply of Leopard 2 tanks and the training of personnel are being considered.


Radar and FCS Oerlikon Skyguard. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

It is alleged that now the supply of Spanish weapons is being discussed through a representative office in Germany. The purpose of such negotiations is to coordinate overseas deliveries to avoid duplication or shortages of products. After the completion of consultations, Spain will begin to ship its air defense systems to the recipient. The exact dates are not named, but it may happen in the very near future.

License and development


The Spada / Skyguard Aspide missile system is a fairly old development. His story dates back to the mid-seventies, when the Italian company Selenia (then Alenia Aeronautica, now part of Leonardo) carried out a deep modernization of the licensed American AIM-7 Sparrow air-to-air missile. The resulting product was put into series in 1977 and brought to the market under the name Aspide ("Aspid Viper").

Subsequently, the Italian industry began to develop Aspide modifications for use on land and offshore platforms. One of the results of this was the ground-based Spada Aspide, also known as the Skyguard Aspide. It was developed jointly with the Swiss company Oerlikon Contraves, which provided its Skyguard fire control system and some other components.

Serial production of the Aspide ground-based air defense system began in 1983 in the interests of the Italian armed forces. Manufacturers managed to get several export orders, which continued until the early nineties. Shortly after its completion, the development of a modernized Aspide 2000 rocket and an improved air defense system, sometimes referred to as Spada 2000, began. The production of such complexes for various orders continued until the early XNUMXs.


Workplace of Skyguard operator. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

Spain ordered Italian-Swiss air defense systems in 1985. The contract provided for the supply of six batteries with two firing sections / platoons each, as well as a training section - a total of 13 platoon sets. Each section included one Skyguard towed radar and FCS, two missile launchers and two Oerlikon GDF-001 towed guns. Together with the launchers, they purchased 200 missiles of the first modification Aspide Mk 1. In the Spanish army, the complexes were used under the name Toledo.

In the mid-nineties, Spain ordered one battery of the upgraded Aspide 2000 air defense system. This kit included only four launchers and approx. 50 rockets of a new modification. The latest modification of the Skyguard FCS was also used.

All received air defense systems remained in operation until 2020. By this time, the equipment of the first modification was morally and physically obsolete; the warranty period for the storage of ammunition has expired. In this regard, Aspide / Toledo was removed from service and transferred to storage. Their place was taken by modern NASAMS air defense systems. The upgraded Aspide 2000s remain on duty for the time being, but play a very limited role in Spanish air defense.

According to the latest data, Spain will transfer one battery of Spada / Skyguard Aspide products to Ukraine. Accordingly, the Ukrainian army can expect to receive only two control radars and four missile launchers. Whether GDF-001 towed guns will be shipped is unclear.


Launcher for Skyguard for Aspide or AIM-7 missiles. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

Technical features


The Spada / Skyguard Aspide or Toledo is a short-range land based air defense system for air defense of designated areas or facilities. All the facilities of the complex are made on a towed chassis and can be quickly delivered to a given position, but then a procedure for deployment and preparation for duty is required.

The Oerlikon Skyguard control system is a towed van with two radar stations, other radio equipment and an operator's cabin. Depending on the modification, the surveillance and search radar allows you to monitor the air situation within a radius of several tens of kilometers. There is an artillery tracking and guidance station, as well as an optical-electronic system. Skyguard independently detects targets or receives target designation from the side, and also generates data for firing and controls launchers.

The Aspide launcher is built on a wheeled platform with jacks. On the turntable there is a swinging part with four transport and launch containers for missiles. It also has two target illumination antennas. Before launch, the installation turns in the direction of the target and accompanies it until the moment of defeat.

The Aspide guided missile is based on some of the AIM-7 solutions, but has major differences. She retained a cylindrical body of high elongation and two sets of X-shaped planes. At the same time, the shape and design of the planes have changed. Product length - 3,63 m, weight - 228 kg.


Rocket launch. Photo by Globalsecurity.org

Like the Sparrow, the Aspide uses a semi-active radar homing head that requires target illumination from the carrier. At the same time, Selenia used the GOS and other components of the Italian design. The missile received an improved high-explosive fragmentation warhead weighing 35 kg. The solid propellant engine was replaced, which gave an increase in flight data. The flight speed is 4M, the range is 25 km.

Wasted Potential


It is easy to see that the Spada / Skyguard Aspide or Toledo air defense systems in the current situation are of minimal interest to the Ukrainian army. Such a technique will only partially make up for the losses of recent months, but will not give any real advantages. The reasons for this are obvious.

First of all, the negative factor is the small number of supplied systems. Just one battery with four launchers and short-range missiles will not be able to cover any large area with sufficient effectiveness. The problem in this case is both the insufficient number of installations and missiles, and the need for integration with other air defense components.

Another problem of the Spanish air defense systems is moral and physical obsolescence. The complexes and missiles planned for transfer were manufactured in the late eighties. They have already worked out their resource and shelf life, which is why in 2020 they were removed from service and sent for storage. Obviously, over the past one and a half to two years, the condition of the products has not improved.


View from a different angle. Photo Globalsecurity.org

However, even in good technical condition, used air defense systems are of no value in terms of combat use. The detection and defeat of such complexes is not a difficult task. The Russian army during the current Special Operation destroyed more advanced and effective anti-aircraft systems.

According to the well-known scenario


Thus, the next episode of foreign military-technical assistance to the Kyiv regime follows the already known scenario. This time in the role of "assistant" is Spain. She decided to allocate a limited number of her equipment and weapons, and in all respects obsolete and decommissioned by her own army.

It is obvious that such “help” is simply useless for the Ukrainian army. However, Kyiv can not count on more. Foreign countries are ready to help him weapons and technology, but are not eager to send modern and promising samples in large quantities. Therefore, even Ukraine's critical need for air defense systems will remain unmet - and this will help the Russian demilitarization operation.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -7
    9 June 2022 04: 02
    Well, everyone wants to test their equipment in Ukraine. request We have seen enough of how we in Syria have untwisted with the military-industrial complex.
    1. +2
      9 June 2022 07: 07
      Have you thrown your hats yet?
  2. +14
    9 June 2022 04: 19
    However, even in good technical condition, used air defense systems are of no value in terms of combat use.

    Does the author himself believe this? wassat
    Even if this air defense system disrupts one sortie of our bomber, or intercepts one Caliber, it will already have combat value. And these, albeit outdated complexes, whatever one may say, will have to be reckoned with.
    1. +5
      9 June 2022 05: 04
      Quote: Tucan
      Even if this air defense system disrupts one sortie of our bomber, or intercepts one Caliber, it will already have combat value.
      Is that so. But the author misses the Swiss component of the air defense system, and as far as I know, the Alpine gnomes directly forbid sending their military products to Ukraine.
      1. 0
        9 June 2022 05: 38
        It seems that they gave permission to the Germans to transfer shells for the Cheetah ZSU, they can also give permission for this.
    2. -6
      10 June 2022 01: 28
      What a horror, shot down one or 10 missiles out of 1000 Yes, even 100. How can we survive this? Can we give up or what? shot down a plane, send two there to kill them, shot down a rocket, send 10 in pursuit.
  3. +1
    9 June 2022 05: 56
    Madrid agreed to provide such assistance, but its shipment was postponed indefinitely due to the complexity of the situation and difficulties in logistics. In early June, the topic of armored vehicles and missile weapons was again raised at the highest level. And only after that it became known about the upcoming deliveries.
    so to create even more difficulties for them in logistics - to destroy the auto-railway communication between Ukraine and NATO countries to the root ...
  4. -4
    9 June 2022 06: 05
    I hope we still have X-31P?
  5. +2
    9 June 2022 06: 13
    The question is ... is it more expensive to dispose of it locally than just sending it all somewhere far away?
    However, we will have to dispose of all this, closer to us, and this is also an expense, alas.
  6. +5
    9 June 2022 07: 27
    Maybe it's time to introduce the ability to filter articles by authors?
    Well, it’s just that all Ryabov’s articles can be told without reading, first the descriptions of NATO equipment from the first source that came across, after the conclusion - it poses no threat to the Russian army ...
    What is already boring somehow
  7. 0
    9 June 2022 07: 36
    Lots of different weapons. Ukraine already has a roof to go from logistics. Different weapons are different ammunition, spare parts, and everything imported and brought from the devil knows where, specialists who need to be trained for half a year, at least, and then, after the destruction of another wunderwaffle, retrained or used as meat in the trenches. Really useless pieces of iron, it will be like in Germany in 1945, weapons seem to be in bulk, but there are no specialists.
    1. +5
      9 June 2022 09: 53
      This is where NATO standardization comes into play:
      All guns fire the same shells - only the firing tables change depending on the gun and barrel length. Again, there is a head start here, IT solutions, the same "Kropiva" on each battery, an artillery calculator, into which all guns have already been added, including Suzanne 2 and Pz2000.

      Uniform technical solutions, standards and specifications greatly facilitate logistics and maintenance.
      The zoo of technology itself is still quite small - M109 (tracked, unique chassis for Ukraine), Caesar (wheels, actually an ordinary truck), Dana / Suzanne / ChehGrad / ChehUragan - Tatra is quite familiar, M113 / YuPR765 is a very unpretentious unit, with which even Africans without education, they are controlled by improvised means, towed guns - well, there are oils, liquids are included.
  8. -4
    9 June 2022 08: 04
    Another problem of the Spanish air defense systems is moral and physical obsolescence. The complexes and missiles planned for transfer were manufactured in the late eighties. They have already worked out their resource and shelf life

    All scrap metal in Ukraine, great help.
    1. +4
      9 June 2022 13: 33
      Are you kidding?!
      Even if it shoots down Russian UAVs and cruise missiles at least partially, then it is already a combat unit with a high value.
      They will save other means of destroying more serious air defense systems that will work on aviation.
  9. +3
    9 June 2022 08: 28
    In addition to Aspid, the Sparrow RVV missile was used in the Sea Sparrow air defense system. The United States was going to develop a ground-based version of this complex at the request of a certain country; but, in my opinion, it ended in nothing ... And so, the "Sparrow" RVV in the air defense system did not particularly "light up"! SPADA air defense systems can pose a threat to the Aerospace Forces, but no more, no less than the Osa-AKM and Kub air defense systems ...
    1. +2
      9 June 2022 09: 57
      Well, let's say some thread of Caliber may well shoot down. Or Rook, because he won’t go to traps. Or from an ambush.

      Speaking of Wasps, Poland has a limited number (10 to 20 cars) with good upgrades. Digitization, minor new things on the radar (again in the direction of digitalization), and most importantly, a new thermal imaging optical channel. I wonder why they haven't lit up yet.
      1. +4
        9 June 2022 10: 52
        Well, anti-radar traps just might work! Both against radar detection, guidance ... and against the zur themselves with a semi-active radar seeker! And many were engaged in the modernization of the Osa-AKM air defense system! Often limited to "half-measures" ... replacing electronic equipment on lamps with equipment on "semiconductors"! Zur itself often remained "old". The most "radical" modernization is the Ukrainian-Belarusian work, which uses both a new radar and new missiles with increased range and "altitude"! Considering that the Osa-AKM still remains in considerable numbers in service with the Armed Forces, the Ministry of Defense should take advantage of the experience and developments of Belarus! The main thing is to have a new radar, and you can pick up the zura! wink For example, 2-stage bicaliber zur 9M335 is suitable for the first samples of "Pantsir-S" (12 km and 8 km ...), you can try to adapt R-77,9M100, 9M338K ...
        1. +3
          9 June 2022 11: 10
          Well, so you have to mix traps - reduce the number of shots.

          As for the Polish Wasp, the Poles did it according to the T-72M1R principle. Replaced what you can without major spending and alterations. The main emphasis was placed on the passive mode, where the shooting is carried out visually. Instead of the old obsolete system, a new one with a thermal imager was installed, which increased the efficiency of this type of application.

          As for global upgrades, here the emphasis is already in the chassis. It is old, and initially far from a masterpiece, it requires attention and many hours of repair. And if you change the radar, the filling and the chassis, then what's the point of clinging to the Wasp, if it's better to develop a new complex in this niche? Actually, this is evident from the Belarusian projects.

  10. -3
    9 June 2022 13: 03
    How to hurt Spain? (The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is not capable of doing this. We immediately put it out of brackets)
  11. +2
    9 June 2022 13: 21
    We Spaniards are fools, we are in NATO, but if we have a conflict with the UK over Gibraltar or with Morocco over Western Sahara, the US has already confirmed its support for these two countries. What are we Spaniards doing in NATO? And what are we doing by sending weapons to the Ukrainian Nazis?
  12. 0
    9 June 2022 13: 35
    Is it really not clear that in order to inflict damage on Russia in aviation and flight crews, NATO countries are ready to put anything and anything to anyone for this.
    For now, sit back and see how it works.
    Well, here are all the conclusions on the surface.
  13. -2
    9 June 2022 14: 22
    The Spaniards decided to "hurry up". Get your trash into Banderland, and instead beg NATO for something fresher))))
  14. 0
    9 June 2022 15: 19
    Analog BukM1
  15. +1
    9 June 2022 18: 06
    Ryabov and muskets. A series of articles about useless weapons.
    write a book
  16. +1
    9 June 2022 19: 41
    Spanish air defense systems Spada

    The brain read: SAM Zrada! .. bully
  17. 0
    12 June 2022 00: 57
    Without good long-range radars, this will not give much, and the APU has no skills on this technique.
  18. 0
    28 July 2022 10: 40
    "It is obvious that such “help” is simply useless for the Ukrainian army."

    Where are such conclusions from?
    even if 50% of the missiles are "rotten" - the rest can harm us
  19. 0
    17 August 2022 03: 52
    Another article on the topic "outdated and inefficient". Another banal lack of knowledge of materiel. So.
    a) Yes, the ASPIDE system - has a semi-active radar seeker. This is presented as a disadvantage. But is it nothing that on the S-300 of many modifications, as well as on the BUK the same semi-active radar seeker? So the semi-active seeker on the S-300 and BUK is a "peremoga", but exactly the same type of seeker on ASP is "Shame"? AFFTARA has no logic. Simultaneously with knowledge of materiel. But is it nothing on the TOR - in general, a radio command guidance system, the resistance of which to electronic warfare means tends to zero? In the USA, the last missiles with a radio command guidance system were TALOS, NIKE HERCULES, NIKE AJAX, which were abandoned .. attention in the SEVENTY. I mean, this technology is outdated 50 years ago (!!!).

    b). Do not forget that SPADA is a variant of the Italian ASPIDE2000, which in all respects surpasses both NATO SI SPARROW and ESSM, American analysts believe that the accuracy and noise immunity of ASPIDE 2000 is superior to ESSM - Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile. Let me remind you that ESSM is considered a MODERN SAM of the American Navy in its niche (clearly, this is not Standard CM2, a completely different size and niche). By the way, both ESSM and ASPIDE confirmed their effectiveness by shooting down anti-ship missiles, including the downing of Iranian anti-ship missiles with an ESSM missile. By the way, Standard SM2 also has a semi-active radar seeker. By the way, the Spada 2000 works with the Thomson CSF RAC 3d radar which detects a Fighter-class target from 85 km away, moreover, it can detect 200 targets and track 128 of them. This is better than the indicators of BUK M2. Buk M2 (radar can detect targets from a greater distance, but it cannot track 128 targets. Moreover, the ASPIDE2000 missile has greater maneuverability than 9M38. By the way, the Tompson CSF RAC3d radar weighs 25 tons, 9S18 from BUK M2 weighs 10 tons more. This just the fact that even a radar heavier than the CSF RAC3D has less resolution and the ability to track so many targets.

    So, what do we have (acre of complete ignorance of the materiel and tactics of AFFTAROM)? We have an inexpensive, fairly efficient, accurate and noise-resistant air defense system. The fact that she has a semi-active radar guidance system does not mean anything. A large number of Russian air defense systems have exactly the same, or much less noise-resistant radio command (which was used in the USA already in the 50-60s and then abandoned). This is a more mobile, lighter and more accurate BUK M2, which has a lower range, but clearly no lower accuracy or noise immunity, with a more technically advanced, lighter radar and a more powerful data processing system.

    I understand that the author is "not a reader, but a writer", but AFFTARU needs to write less and read more. Then it will not be agitation in the style of "We will throw hats", extremely limited in their technical and tactical literacy, but normal technical reviews. By the way, all these articles with the mantras "obsoletely ineffectively" immediately give rise to the question "If all this is #obsolete and ineffectively effective, why is the Russian army, on paper, in theory, the" 2nd army of the world "has been unable to cope with the hohloschweinen shobble commanded by the drug clown, extremely reminiscent of Krosty The Clown from The Simpsons (also a clown, also a Jew, and also not very funny).

    And AFFTARU fat minus for an absolutely illiterate agitation.
    1. 0
      31 August 2022 17: 27
      By the way, the Tompson CSF RAC3d radar weighs 25 tons, the 9S18 from BUK M2 weighs 10 tons more.
      - is this together with the chassis?;)) Then, yes, an important indicator.
      But is it nothing on the TOR - in general, a radio command guidance system, the resistance of which to electronic warfare means tends to zero?
      - can you elaborate on which electronic warfare and how? And then many are not in the know, even in modern missiles they use air [-air] in the initial phase of the flight.
      why the Russian army, on paper, in theory, the "2nd Army of the World" has not been able to cope with the khokhloschweinen shobl commanded by the drug addict clown for half a year

      the answer to this question is not military, but political. And so the first army of the world could not cope with a much weaker Afghanistan, from which they had to flee, leaving their equipment and personnel behind.
      1. -1
        31 August 2022 18: 24
        Oh, how you love to jump on the rake here. I am happy to provide it for you. Open your ears, for I bring a ray of enlightenment into your dark souls and minds... So, let's begin.
        a) About who fled from where. And with what speed did YOU escape from Afghanistan? Obviously after "Peremoga".
        With what speed did you run away from Eastern Europe, that same Eastern Europe that rushed to kiss the US hands (and not only hands) ahead of its own squeal? Your country, the USSR, your troops GENERALLY surrendered without a fight. During the GKCHB, your "valiant", "indestructible und legendary" stood looking like idiots and sucked ... their own thumbs (at best), waiting for who would win - the generals or Yeltsin, and who would run to kiss his hand, swearing allegiance. After that, even the stump became clear that your army is NOT RELIABLE. And what about Chechnya? Oh yes, after the huge "Peremogs", you pay tribute there. As in the Horde, yours is no stranger. All the luxury of Chechnya with its golden-domed mosques and other nishtyaks is your TRIBUTE. in the form of subsidies. Chechnya produces nothing but Chechens, gangsters and drugs, so all luxury is YOUR money - TRIBUTE. They take money from you like from cheap stalls.
        b) Well, let's talk about Afghanistan. We have already established that you fled from there just like us and like the English. But instead of saying "Hooray, the Americans have left Afghanistan", let's take a deep breath, count to 10 . So, for those who live under a block (Lives under the rock), and don't know anything and don't want to know - here's political information for you.
        An AGREEMENT was reached that the Taliban will stop ALL attacks on US interests - EVERYWHERE, and the US will leave Afghanistan. This agreement was signed by our eagle, Don Trump and the Taliban kept their word. Since Trump always keeps his word, unlike some (“Until I am president, there will be no increase in the retirement age”), we will not say who, although it was Putin. That had to go. Biden writhed for a long time, but even he realized that the violation of the agreement with the Taliban was a huge trump card for the enemies of the United States and ordered to leave. Immediately came the order to DO NOT TAKE weapons and equipment, and most importantly (ATTENTION) - DO NOT BREAK AND DO NOT DESTROY. Our generals and officers, unlike yours, are not afraid to argue with the president and sent written objections. And not one or two, but almost all in the rank of colonel and above. They wrote reports that they say there is no need to do this, no need to arm the Taliban. But confirmation of the order came, our military shrugged their shoulders and carried out the order. Dropped all weapons and equipment. Yours immediately began to jump, how they jumped for Vouchers and watched on TV how ours were leaving Afghanistan, about the same as yours charged on the same TV, cans of water with Energy from Kashperovsky according to the precepts of Ostap Bender, the fox Alice and Cat Basilio - You don’t need a knife for a fool - you’ll lie to him a little, but it turned out that your whole country is like that). You jumped so cool that you didn’t even think about one little thing: on WHOSE borders were there shoblos of religious fanatics frostbitten to the whole head, armed with fairly new American weapons? You can think now. And I'll wait, I'll count to ten (One ... the sun rises, two - the sun rises, three - there is no brighter luminary in the sky ....). Hint - this cabal of psychotic scumbags is NOT on the borders of the United States. Guess where she is? And then you and I will concentrate and think well - SUDDENLY, anti-Russian speeches began and the heat of religious Islamic fanaticism began in all shit with names starting with "Stan" - Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan. There was nothing for so many years and SUDDENLY ... it started, and the CHS, exactly after ours left and left donkeys and sheep, dofiga weapons, equipment and other goodies for turban-headed lovers. But this is all coincidence, of course. Just coincidences. It's just that a hotbed of tension on your southern borders SUDDENLY created by itself ... self-created. Without any reasons. You just need to think a little more than 1 step forward, and not be like a Pavlovian dog with a reflex reaction to everything "Hurrah, the Yankos left Afghanistan" - they left ... and now CAREFULLY think about whom we planted a colossal pig with this departure ... Hint - not Argentina.
        1. 0
          31 August 2022 19: 32
          I understood - Korea, Vietnam and Afghanistan - they were all peers, just not everyone sees it;)). And what about electronic warfare and hypersonic maneuvers? Okay, we have non-kosher missiles, but your THAAD missiles maneuver in hypersound up to 8 M and do not fall apart at the same time! And they are also equipped with a seeker, miraculously seeing through a cloud of plasma, and homing themselves on enemy BR! Something like this..
          1. 0
            31 August 2022 23: 43
            Korea - was just a victory. The US kept half of Korea under our auspices, inflicting absolutely incomparable losses on both China and North Korea. Vietnam was a political defeat The US Armed Forces did not lose a single battle, the "Leaders" simply lost their desire to fight. Approximately like yours now, in Khokhloschweinestan.
            About Afghanistan - already explained above. Read, although I already understand that the Chukchi is not a reader, but a writer.
        2. 0
          31 August 2022 19: 40
          So, for those who live under a block (Lives under the rock), and don't know anything and don't want to know - here's political information for you.
          - before giving political information, it would be nice to learn English, there are two errors in the phrase in brackets.
          1. 0
            31 August 2022 23: 45
            You need to learn English "He lives under the rock" absolutely correct spelling HE LIVES - He lives...
            1. 0
              1 September 2022 12: 58
              Okay, let's take a closer look...
              Quote: Baron Pardus
              You need to learn English "He lives under the rock" absolutely correct spelling HE LIVES - He lives...
              Even this is not entirely true, since the idiom sounds correctly "He lives under a rock' - see examples of use in English literature. In the first phrase "So, for those who live under a rock (Lives under the rock)" - the translation is incorrect, so like a verb even in American English it has to agree and the correct translation would be "For those who live under a rock" or "For those that live under a rock" I now also understand that reading is NOT YOUR thing.
              As for Korea, it all depends on the point of view, the glass is either half empty or half full. In Afghanistan, the USSR also did not lose; it was a political decision to withdraw troops. As for Chechnya, there are many subsidized regions in the Russian Federation, and Chechnya is far from the first place both in absolute terms in terms of subsidies and in terms of per capita (in the first place in terms of the latter indicator, your beloved Chukotka, ;)))). So read, be enlightened, and go to the camp of readers ...