Electronic and anti-aircraft weapons: combating UAVs in the Special Operations

53

Russian anti-aircraft gunner and the wreckage of the Ukrainian UAV Bayraktar TB2

In the recent past, Ukraine had a fairly large fleet of unmanned aviation complexes of different classes and types. At the end of February, it began to be used against the Russian army, and the results of this were predictable. Our army has a wide range of means at its disposal to counter and destroy UAVs - and they constantly demonstrate their potential.

Future targets


Since 2014, the Kyiv regime, using the advice and assistance of foreign countries, began to build a full-fledgedfleet» drones. Foreign samples of different classes were purchased, and unsuccessful attempts were made to create their own technology. By the beginning of this year, a total of several hundred complexes had entered service.



The army and other structures were supplied with UAVs for various purposes and different classes. First of all, light reconnaissance drones of local or foreign production, military and civilian, were purchased. The heavy class was initially represented only by the old Soviet Reys and Swifts, but a few years ago, purchases of Turkish Bayraktar TB2s began. There was also a certain interest in the so-called. loitering ammunition.


Electronic warfare complex "Palantin" in position

With the beginning of the Russian special operation, the fleet of Ukrainian UAVs began to shrink. To compensate for the losses, new deliveries of foreign equipment of all main classes began, incl. widely advertised. However, imported products face the same threats and are regularly suppressed or shot down.

According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, the Ukrainian army has lost approx. 1150 drones of all types. The number of thwarted sorties, in which the vehicles could not solve the task due to opposition, is unknown and can hardly be counted. At the same time, Ukraine still has a solid stock of UAVs and continues to use them. Accordingly, the number of downed devices will continue to grow.

Opposition and suppression


A characteristic disadvantage and problem of almost all UAVs is the dependence on radio communications. Commands, telemetry and video signals are transmitted over radio channels, and their suppression interferes with the full performance of tasks. In this regard, electronic warfare complexes are an effective, flexible and convenient means of countering drones.


Calculation "Stole" at work

Various domestic electronic warfare equipment has been used from the very beginning of the Special Operation. The Ministry of Defense regularly shows their work and reveals some of its results. It is reported that in the combat zone and in the rear, both full-size systems on a car chassis and portable or portable systems are used.

So, in mid-April, the Ministry of Defense showed the work of the Murmansk-BN and Krasukha-4 complexes. In early June, they demonstrated the operation and use of the Palantin product. Outwardly, the operation of the electronic warfare systems does not look very impressive - vehicles with antenna devices simply stand in position, and their calculations work quietly in the cockpits.

At the same time, any such complex can remotely affect several aerial unmanned targets within a radius of tens or hundreds of kilometers. Without external effects, control channels are suppressed and the combat mission is disrupted. So, in one of the April videos from the Ministry of Defense, the EW company commander said that during one of the duties, his unit had to simultaneously suppress 12 enemy reconnaissance and strike UAVs. They lost contact with the operators and were unable to strike at our troops.


Electronic warfare complex "Murmansk-BN"

It should be noted that UAVs are only one of the targets of electronic warfare systems. Depending on the current situation, "Krasukha", "Stoles" and other products can detect and suppress communication channels of military units, radar signals, etc. As a result, the enemy troops do not have the opportunity to fully monitor the Russian army, coordinate their actions and solve combat missions in general.

Matters of Defeat


When communication channels are suppressed, the UAV cannot conduct reconnaissance or strike, but is able to return to the base to prepare for the next flight. If the drone gets into the zone of destruction of air defense, not only the solution of the assigned task is excluded, but also its further existence. Russian air defense has already chalked up more than 1150 unmanned targets, including advertised imported ones.

As part of our ground forces operating in Ukraine, there is a developed military air defense. In addition, important areas are covered by object defense systems. All of them interact with radar facilities that illuminate the situation above the line of contact and to a great depth of enemy territory. Such layered air defense poses a great danger to both manned aircraft and air defense.


ZRPK "Pantsir-S1", involved in the Special Operation

The Ministry of Defense has repeatedly demonstrated the combat work of our military and facility air defense against various air targets, incl. unmanned. The calculations of the ADMS and ZRAK successfully shoot down the targets found and confirm the characteristics of their equipment. In addition, curious materials are coming in from the Ukrainian side. So, a video was published from a drone that managed to film the flight of a missile aimed at it.

The Pantsir-S1 complex again proves to be an effective means of combating UAVs. He has already demonstrated his capabilities in exercises, as well as in real battles in Syria and Libya. Now he confirms the ability to intercept drones of various classes, incl. small and light. In addition, the "Shells" made a certain contribution to the destruction of the group of vaunted "Bayraktars". With the help of guided missiles, he is able to hit such targets at ranges up to 15-20 km, and guns allow you to attack objects at short ranges.


Defeat the target "Shell"

To defeat heavy reconnaissance and strike UAVs, the Tor and Buk air defense systems of the latest models are also used. The Tor-M2 short-range complex controls the airspace within a radius of 12 km, and the Buk-M3 is capable of hitting targets 70 km away. Both systems cover all operating heights of existing unmanned aircraft.

Russian air defense systems pose a particular danger to Ukrainian unmanned aircraft. They have repeatedly demonstrated a high probability of hitting UAVs of all classes in a wide range of ranges and altitudes. At the same time, the enemy drone is forced to enter the zone of destruction of the air defense system - otherwise it will not be able to conduct reconnaissance or use its weapons.

Not so long ago it became known that for the fight against UAVs is now used weapon "on new physical principles". Together with the well-known equipment, the Zadira combat laser complex is involved in the Special Operation. It is reported that this product is capable of suppressing optical systems and / or destroying the structure of a drone from a distance of 5 km. Unfortunately, the work of "Badass" has not yet been shown.


SAM "Tor-M2" in position

Demonstration of opportunities


The value and potential of unmanned aircraft became known for a long time, and the consequence of this was a special attention to the issues of combating it. As it turned out, such tasks can be solved by complexes of traditional classes - anti-aircraft missile systems and electronic warfare systems. Our industry has extensive experience in these areas and has been able to adapt existing and future products to new challenges. In addition, it was possible to create a fundamentally new sample of an unusual kind, which is already demonstrating its capabilities.

Developments in the field of combating UAVs were regularly practiced during various tests and during army exercises. The proposed ideas and solutions confirmed their potential and, if necessary, were improved. As a result, the armed forces received a set of various systems and complexes capable of dealing with the entire spectrum of current threats.

Right now, domestic means and systems designed to combat unmanned aircraft are demonstrating their capabilities in the course of real combat operations. They have already destroyed more than 1150 enemy UAVs and disrupted a huge number of sorties. At the same time, along with a downed drone, enemy troops each time lose certain capabilities, which contributes to their speedy demilitarization.
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    11 June 2022 04: 45
    The number of UAVs in Ukraine is simply off scale. The Americans planned to deliver (or have already delivered) 121 Phoenix Ghost loitering BPs, 700 Switchblade 600/300 loitering BPs, RQ-11B Raven small UAV - 24 sets. At the briefing on 11.04, the destruction of the X-58A Valkyrie UAV (American-made, are they even supplied?)
    How many "Bayraktars" were delivered exactly is unknown. According to my calculations, 84, of which, according to briefings with Konashenkov, 83-84 were shot down.
    In Ukraine, the Spectator-M1 UAV and the Spectator-M UAV were produced. More than 60 of the latter have been delivered. Since 2021, the Leleka-100 UAV has been produced, the ACS-3 UAV has been developed (I don’t know if it came to production)
    Well, the drones purchased in stores are simply incalculable. Our air defense has a lot of work to do.
    1. +5
      11 June 2022 05: 52
      Kh-58s are likely being tested in combat conditions
      1. +9
        11 June 2022 09: 17
        When suppressing communication channels, the UAV cannot conduct reconnaissance or strike, however, able to return to base to prepare for the next flight.
        It would be relevant for loitering ammunition to return to the base. wink
        1. +3
          11 June 2022 09: 34
          Yeah, followed by detonation)))
    2. +1
      11 June 2022 07: 37
      We can say that drones are a modern way of warfare. The French were interested in this. But as I understand it, they missed the means of countering low-flying, low-speed and small-sized targets. The Belgorod region has already felt the arrival of these little birds. For the civilian population, this is a very good reason to panic. And the tactics of using drones will probably improve. They will move from single ones to flocks of a hundred or a thousand drones. Then how to fight against them? Are modern resources enough? Judging by Belgorod, there is not enough for singles.
    3. +1
      11 June 2022 08: 28
      As far as I know, a lot of blah (from dji mini 2 and more) are launched in our bodies. And this is done by people without shoulder straps and machine guns. Then there is a drain on the mobile or regular Internet of intelligence, we receive arrivals from our bases. Such drones can only be seen through an optical channel. They are easier to detect, which is done by Palantine, via a video channel from a drone and / or less often via a control channel from the ground. In order to catch and jam such control channels, it makes sense to use cell towers or install similar ones specifically for these purposes and, in addition, deploy a vpn network on them for the needs of the NWO, turn off the civil mobile Internet.
      In general, it is desirable to kill the Internet (primarily mobile) behind enemy lines for at least 50 km.
      1. +10
        11 June 2022 08: 58
        Very informative article, its paraphrase:
        "Ukraine has UAVs, but 1150 UAVs have already been destroyed.
        Russia uses electronic warfare equipment, thanks to which 1150 UAVs were destroyed. There are already more effective means.
        Air defense systems, including Pantsir and Tor, destroyed 1150 UAVs.
        Thank you for your attention. According to the official materials of the MO.
        Very fresh and informative... Yes
        1. +4
          11 June 2022 11: 00
          Very informative article, its paraphrase:

          good
          Thank you.
          -reading the original source, I almost fell asleep from the mantras and from the repetition
          - the second call according to your training manual, clarified the situation.
      2. +10
        11 June 2022 09: 01
        Quote from Ablet
        As far as I know, a lot of blah (from dji mini 2 and more) are launched in our bodies

        Weekly maintenance allows you to turn them off.
        50 ml of medical alcohol infused with fly agaric before going to bed guarantees a software failure.
        Increasing the dosage to 100 ml (at your own risk) allows the host body to take control of the nanodrones.
        1. +3
          11 June 2022 09: 34
          Rear of course))) insidious T9
          1. KLV
            0
            12 June 2022 20: 11
            Well, yes, it's understandable. "I am writing from a tank, there is no time to check errors, I shoot back from a secret T9 machine gun."
    4. +2
      11 June 2022 15: 11
      inimitable Ryabov K. ... smile
      Already 20 paragraphs out of four (essentially) on copy-paste (!). belay
      Here is the guy!!!!
    5. +1
      11 June 2022 16: 45
      ...700 loitering BP Switchblade 600/300...
      A very, very unpleasant (and effective) thing ...
    6. +3
      12 June 2022 11: 00
      This is a reality… today the work of an Art battery without a UAV is no longer real… take the number of batteries and multiply by the UAV calculation (there are several drones) and get thousands and thousands of UAVs. And UAVs are now needed by everyone from artillerymen, tankers to helicopter pilots and bombers. The modern trend is that fighters need a faithful wingman.
      1. 0
        12 June 2022 22: 20
        Not batteries, but a division. And it works quite well, as we see, even without UAVs. Optical, sound, airborne, cosmo, electronic intelligence has not been canceled. If there is a UAV, it can also add intelligence. But even without it, artillery dominates the battlefields.
        1. 0
          14 June 2022 11: 17
          Yes .... only with optical reconnaissance there are big risks of their loss. Both Avia and space do not belong to the unit commander .... which increases the reaction time ....
  2. +8
    11 June 2022 06: 49
    Electronic and anti-aircraft weapons: combating UAVs in the Special Operations

    However, not all reconnaissance UAVs are affected. Anti-aircraft weapons are clearly not enough, although it is reconnaissance UAVs that lead to targeted attacks, which is often worse than attack drones. We need a small air defense system based on the same "Tiger", but not MANPADS. Radio command or laser reference guidance of small missiles. Such a complex can also be used to intercept loitering ammunition and ATGMs.
    1. +1
      11 June 2022 07: 13
      Or wait for Derivation-Air Defense.
    2. +6
      11 June 2022 07: 34
      It's time to think about developing interceptor drones! Moreover, both for equipping artillery, armored, "infantry" units; and for the use of air defense systems! They promised to bungle an "air mine" on the basis of the "Lancets" ... maybe something is being done in this direction? The Molniya UAV project would also be suitable as a "base" for a "kamikaze" interceptor! It is also possible to use drones-carriers of explosive missiles of the "Orion", "Forpost" type, using, for example, S-8L missiles ...
      1. +2
        11 June 2022 08: 06
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        It's time to think about developing interceptor drones!

        Some have already been developed and are being tested.

        Quadcopters
        Volk-18 is equipped with 3 nets.
        Gyrfalcon with a 12 gauge shotgun.
        Helicopter Tiber TB-29V for jamming.
        Modestly, however.
        But the topic was not seriously studied.
        Maybe there is more
        1. +1
          11 June 2022 10: 22
          So far, all this is "testing the pen" (trial attempts) in an effort to find real concepts! But equipping UAVs with networks for anyone can find real use ... for example, to "pick up" their drones that have returned from a mission ... even "kamikaze" drones that have not found "their" target! There are projects to use drones with networks to intercept hypersonic missiles ...
          1. 0
            11 June 2022 11: 14
            Quote: Nikolaevich I
            with networks for

            They tried to use the network to protect tanks from enemy shells)
          2. 0
            19 June 2022 19: 26
            What kind of net can intercept a rocket, although what I say I saw on TV how they catch a bullet with their teeth.
            1. 0
              19 June 2022 20: 11
              Quote: Titus_2
              I saw on TV how they catch a bullet with their teeth.

              I did not see...
              Quote: Titus_2
              What mesh can intercept a missile

              "Special" grid! There are projects ... but they should be discussed in more detail ... now I don’t want to do it; busy !
              1. 0
                19 June 2022 21: 43
                About the bullet, I scoffed and expressed my opinion. It’s just that a drone with a mesh should move at what speed and in order to edit the mesh once, since more than one need to pull, it means everything should be synchronous. I do not rule out that something will happen, but not very soon. Purely my opinion is to catch a hypersonic missile with a net with its inertia and mass, it can start with MLRS.
        2. 0
          13 June 2022 13: 34
          We need a bla interceptor with a 40 mm grenade launcher. One grenade and bye bye quadcopter. Fortunately, many centuries do not need to bring down DJI
  3. +1
    11 June 2022 07: 22
    It is quite logical that modern concepts of military operations are being tested in Ukraine, including the operation of UAVs. In my opinion, air defense is coping with its tasks, but, as it was rightly noted, in such conditions there should be more complexes. On "weapons based on new physical principles." The work of "Bastard" is not shown correctly. If the laser installation is involved, then any demonstration of this complex can give information on it to the enemy. And this is of no use to us at all.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +6
    11 June 2022 08: 20
    The article incomprehensibly says about the use of "Thor" and "Shell". It turns out that these short-range air defense systems are used to destroy different classes of UAVs. "Thor" against large ones, and "Shell" against all.
    But this is not so, from the word "absolutely". Both "Thor" and "Shell" are effective against any type of UAV. These air defense systems initially differ in their tasks. "Shell" should cover the more long-range S-300/400, and "Tor" directly protects the places of deployment of troops. But they absolutely do not care which object to shoot down. Anyone who enters their area of ​​effect.
  6. 0
    11 June 2022 08: 32
    Electronic and anti-aircraft weapons: combating UAVs in the Special Operations
    . It is clear that complex countermeasures will be the most effective.
    Everything as usual.
  7. +5
    11 June 2022 08: 49
    Quote: author
    ... it became known that weapons “based on new physical principles” are now being used to combat UAVs ... Unfortunately, the work of the “Badass” has not yet been demonstrated.

    belay
    Well so, "new physical principles" they are, you can't demonstrate them.laughing
    When I hear the talk of journalists about "new physical principles", I involuntarily recall Lavrov with his "eccentrics, damn it."
    1. +5
      11 June 2022 09: 19
      Well, it’s necessary to write something like that about “superiority”, to remind you of “having no analogues in the world”, otherwise people are cycling on raising funds for the purchase of Chinese drones on Ali ...
    2. +1
      11 June 2022 11: 06
      I remember Lavrov with his "eccentrics, damn it."

      Support.
      And they talk ... a glance
    3. +3
      11 June 2022 13: 09
      When I hear journalists talking about "new physical principles"
      Well, these journalists write about the "oscilloscope needle". They don't even know the old principles, so much for the new ones.
  8. +4
    11 June 2022 09: 37
    I'm wondering - "Tor - M2" and "Pantsir" are very close in their performance characteristics, except that the "Thor" has no guns. But there is "Tunguska". So why make two air defense systems if you can produce one?
  9. +2
    11 June 2022 10: 57
    On the effectiveness of the fight against UAVs in the Special Operation.
    How much does a UAV cost and how much does it cost to shoot it down? (Price quality)
    And if a swarm of drones?
    I want to see how the UAV is shot down by a combat laser.
    1. +3
      11 June 2022 11: 43
      The human life of our fighter is priceless!!!
      1. 0
        12 June 2022 19: 30
        [quote = huntsman650] The human life of our fighter is priceless !!! [/ quP
        Around 7 million rubles.
  10. -9
    11 June 2022 14: 50
    Where did all the UAV praisers on Military Review go?
  11. +3
    11 June 2022 17: 29
    We urgently need shells with a remote detonation system so as not to waste expensive missiles on small and ultra-small UAVs! hi
    1. +1
      12 June 2022 11: 45
      Maybe it's better then to develop special inexpensive small missiles against such drones?
      A missile can be guided, but a projectile cannot. And the range of a rocket is greater than that of a projectile.
    2. 0
      12 June 2022 19: 54

      senima56
      For the gun cal. 57 mm on Derivation - air defense is a must.
  12. 0
    11 June 2022 18: 15
    Now here's a question for an expert. Does the radio fuse fit on the 30-mm "Shell"?
    Programmable undermining is certainly beautiful. But even if the 20th gun throws fragments even at 30 meters ... Yes, I have not heard about protected tanks on UAVs.
    1. 0
      13 June 2022 14: 19
      It's just being tested. Haven't entered the military yet.
      1. 0
        13 June 2022 15: 29
        God bless the designers of good luck and skill.
        In my humble opinion, this is a relatively cheap solution to the problem with light UAVs. I saw filming of shooting at the firing range at flying targets from the "Shell". Three lines and past. And you can see from the tracers that shells pass nearby. Then a rocket and a bullseye.
  13. +3
    11 June 2022 22: 29
    Long is the path of storytelling, short is the path of showing. ©
    The UAV of the 45th brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine during the reconnaissance of our rear got acquainted with the missile defense system:
  14. 0
    12 June 2022 11: 43
    By the way, there is an idea how to nullify the impact of electronic warfare on drones.
    If you use a swarm of drones, line them up in a chain and they will relay a signal from a forward reconnaissance that is different from the radio signal.
  15. AML
    +3
    12 June 2022 17: 25
    Quote: trenkkvaz
    By the way, there is an idea how to nullify the impact of electronic warfare on drones.
    If you use a swarm of drones, line them up in a chain and they will relay a signal from a forward reconnaissance that is different from the radio signal.


    - Rebbe all the chickens died
    - Have you rested? It's a pity. I had so many more ideas.

    A long time ago, when mammoths climbed trees and there were 3 moons, there was such a subject as 'Theory of Queuing'

    Well, you get the point.
  16. 0
    13 June 2022 13: 41
    The article is interesting, but the topic price - quality is not disclosed. Shooting down quadcopters with Torami is very expensive. We need a decent anti-aircraft complex like Tunguska but with a more accurate gun. Ammunition with a radio or an inertial fuse to cheaply hit the same DJI. 57 mm gun in general
  17. 0
    13 June 2022 14: 47
    Also, Strela 10 was noted in the fight against drones.
  18. +1
    18 June 2022 06: 47
    What a pleasure to read the article. Where our electronic warfare perfectly counteracts enemy drones And our air defense does not allow those to rise into the sky or, in extreme cases, immediately shoots them down.
    Just as if the article was up to its own.
    And then you go to YouTube and watch a video where our ship is hit by two missiles, which are closely watched by a bayraktar. And no electronic warfare or air defense shot down this same bayraktar, just like missiles.
    undoubtedly, Russian and air defense and electronic warfare are quite powerful things. Just not as powerful and effective as we all thought before the special operation.
  19. +2
    20 June 2022 00: 47
    A detailed analysis of what is with our electronic warfare from the VIF forum
    https://vif2ne.org/nvk/forum/0/co/3000474.htm
    1. +3
      20 June 2022 01: 31
      Quote: certero
      https://vif2ne.org/nvk/forum/0/co/3000474.htm

      Thank you, I read it with interest.
      1. +3
        20 June 2022 12: 19
        Quote: Repellent
        Quote: certero
        https://vif2ne.org/nvk/forum/0/co/3000474.htm

        Thank you, I read it with interest.

        All the same, the Anglo-Saxons managed to arrange a training ground for the development of weapons practically with us.