The Pentagon stops the development of ultra-long-range weapons SLRC

41

Experienced self-propelled guns XM1299 with an ERCA gun - another American long-range artillery project

A few years ago, the US Army launched the development of a promising Strategic Long Range Cannon (SLRC) artillery gun. The objective of the project was to create an ultra-long-range gun capable of hitting targets at a distance of at least 1000 nautical miles. Over the past time, they managed to carry out part of the preliminary research and design work, but now the project is being stopped due to ambiguous prospects.

By decision of Congress


The termination of work on the Strategic Long Range Cannon project (“Long-range strategic gun”) was reported on May 23 by Defense News, citing the press service of the ground forces. The reasons for such a decision, its expected consequences, etc. were disclosed.



According to known data, in FY2022. The Pentagon planned to spend approx. $70 million. These funds were proposed to be used to start the development of a technical project. At the same time, the plans for the next financial years did not include the cost of an ultra-long-range gun. Probably, the program was going to be included in the new budgets at the stage of their formation.


Prototype M777ER compared to conventional M777 howitzer

It has now become known that Congress did not include the SLRC program in the FY 2022 military budget. In this regard, the Ministry of the Army was forced to officially stop work. By the time it stopped, the program had passed the research stage and was just entering the design stage. The assembly of an experimental gun did not even begin.

The press service of the army clarifies that the reason for the cancellation of funding and the closure of the project was economic inexpediency. The Congress and the Ministry of the Army assume that the completion of the development of the SLRC will cost several billion dollars. However, the success of the project is not guaranteed. And even if the work is successfully completed, subsequent production, deployment of guns in the troops and their operation will again lead to high costs.

It was also suggested that the new type of gun would be redundant. The rocket and artillery weapons system under construction includes promising projects that combine a range of up to 1000 miles and a high projectile speed. At the same time, such missiles should have a number of important advantages over an ultra-long-range gun.


Congress and the Ministry of the Army considered unacceptable high spending without a guarantee of the desired effect and without special benefits, and therefore the SLRC program is being closed. The released money is supposed to be redirected to other promising projects in the field of long-range strike systems - more realistic and useful. These are the projects of the ERCA extended range weapon, the PrSM ballistic missile, the LRHW hypersonic complex, etc.

Plans and work


The development of the SLRC gun was announced in 2019. Then it was reported that the goal of the project was to create an ultra-long-range artillery system capable of sending a projectile 1000 miles (1850 km). Such a weapon, which has obvious advantages over any existing and prospective cannon artillery, as well as over some missile systems, could solve special problems.

At the first stage of the program, in 2019-21. it was planned to determine the fundamental possibility of creating such a weapon, as well as to find the necessary technologies. Upon receipt of positive theoretical results, they were going to develop, build and test an experimental artillery system. The first firing could take place as early as 2023.

After conducting part of the theoretical research, in September 2020, the Pentagon turned to the National Academy of Sciences for help. A special commission of the Academy was to study the existing developments on the topic of SLRC and evaluate their real prospects. An optimistic forecast made it possible to draw up an accurate roadmap for the next work and begin their implementation.


Long-range projectile for ERCA. It is likely that the SLRC could receive a similar ammunition

The commission worked until January 2021 and prepared the required report. This document has not yet been published, and even the general conclusions and proposals are unknown. However, the general course of the SLRC program and the latest statements by the Ministry of Army suggest that the Academy has come to disappointing conclusions. The project could be considered too complex and expensive to fully implement and bring to service.

The closed report of the National Academy of Sciences was prepared at the beginning of last year, and the fate of the SLRC project was finally decided only now. Perhaps the Ministry of the Army was still trying to save a promising development, arguing or carrying out certain work. However, in the end, the final decision was made - the continuation of the SLRC program at this stage is not advisable.

Technical secrets


Unfortunately, the bulk of the technical aspects of the promising project were not disclosed. The Pentagon named only the desired firing range, and only one of the possible principles of operation of the gun was mentioned in open documents. What could be a ready-made artillery complex for arming is a big question.

According to known data, fundamentally new solutions and principles were to be used in the SLRC program. First of all, a new way to launch a projectile with the required energy and, accordingly, range was required. Traditional gunpowder-charged barrel systems have limited potential, and on this principle it will not be possible to make a gun with a range of 1000 miles.


Operational-tactical missile PrSM

It was reported that within the framework of the SLRC, electromagnetic methods for launching a projectile were being investigated. Which one exactly was not specified. The estimated potential of different technologies is also unknown. It was not reported which of them is of the greatest interest and will be used in the project.

It is obvious that a special ammunition is needed to obtain a record range. At launch, it must receive the appropriate speed and energy, and the flight profile must provide an economical consumption of them. In addition, means of maintaining flight speed may be needed. Guidance systems are also required to reduce the likelihood of a miss.

Such requirements should affect the design of the projectile. It could be a guided active-rocket munition, more like a super- or hypersonic missile. It is clear that such a product will not be simple and cheap, and such features of it have the most serious impact on the economic performance of the entire artillery system.

The Pentagon stops the development of ultra-long-range weapons SLRC

LRHW hypersonic missile system

It is easy to see that the SLRC system, based on all the necessary solutions and technologies, would hardly be similar to traditional cannon artillery. It can be viewed as a specific weapon that fires missiles, or as a missile system with a complex launcher that gives the ammunition initial acceleration.

This architecture of the complex has well-known advantages and allows you to increase the main characteristics. At the same time, its creation requires a number of new technologies and solutions, which increases technical risks. In addition, the finished complex turns out to be excessively complex for production and operation. With all this, a special architecture does not provide fundamental advantages over traditional missile systems.

Useful experience


Thus, in a few years, the Pentagon managed to launch a promising project, conduct the necessary research, draw conclusions - and close it due to the lack of real prospects. At the stage of theoretical study, a range of necessary solutions and technologies for such a project was determined. In addition, it was determined that the current level of development of science and technology will not allow obtaining all the desired results. This allows you not to spend money on obviously useless development.

However, the failure of the SLRC project as a whole will not affect the development of the missile forces and artillery of the US Army. Work continues on a more modest but viable ERCA long-range gun project, incl. in a self-propelled version. The PrSM operational-tactical complex and the hypersonic LRHW are also being developed. These projects are expected to be completed in the near future, and savings on the closed SLRC will contribute to their early success.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    1 June 2022 18: 17
    Water water... all around water sad
    1. +6
      1 June 2022 18: 26
      capable of hitting targets at a range of at least 1000 nautical miles.

      I wonder how they were going to hit targets at such a range?
      Direct Jules-vertex on a modern basis. Rocket projectile with appropriate body kits? Then only the name and the barrel as a guide are obtained from the gun ...
      Too bad there aren't many details.
      1. +2
        1 June 2022 18: 30
        I wonder how they were going to hit targets at such a range?

        Written by a rocket.
        Too bad there aren't many details.

        Yes, everything has already been described 10 times.
        The gun is not a guide, but an upper stage, accelerates the rocket to hypersound, then it rises for 60 kilometers and flies almost in an airless space, and then the engine turns on.
      2. +1
        2 June 2022 03: 28
        I wonder how they were going to hit targets at such a range?
        And this is not necessary! The main thing is to sell such a beautiful idea and get money for it .... Well, and then portray a vigorous activity ... with the result "well, it didn't work out" .... At the same time, the budget will "master" succeed! laughing
      3. 0
        2 June 2022 08: 23
        "Five Hundred Million Begums"
        good romance
      4. -2
        19 July 2022 17: 19
        how were they going to hit targets at such a range

        Just like the cannon at Zamwalt laughing Each shot costs three tomahawks. With a three times shorter range and an incomparable warhead. Here, however, the order of prices is somewhat different, apparently, was assumed.
        It is a pity that they did not bring it to mind. There would be another exhibit in the row of prodigies (f-117, f-35, the same Zamwalt ... What else is there?)
        By the way, these
        long-range ERCA guns, incl. in a self-propelled version. The PrSM operational-tactical complex and the hypersonic LRHW are also being developed.
        , a campaign from the same opera ...
    2. +9
      2 June 2022 02: 44
      Water water... all around water

      Maxim, hello!

      It's not water, it's the urine of a young pig!
      I do not know who to appeal to - to the administration of the resource? It makes no sense, because this administration publishes these vitias.
      Directly to Kirill Ryabov? Yes, he is even more violet to such appeals (since they publish and pay, it means “everything is in a bunch”).
      But, if suddenly some rudiments of conscience have been preserved in the named Cyril, then perhaps he will be honored:
      1. At the beginning of the article, indicate the source from which the first part was copied.
      2. To separate the first, copied part from the subsequent own verbiage explicitly (such as a thick line ======================).
      3. Stop blocking the VO. If it’s really bad with money, and no benefits, in principle, shine, turn to the VO audience in no uncertain terms. There are many kind people here.

      hi
  2. +7
    1 June 2022 18: 22
    Research brings more profit than real production, since it practically does not require costs, only an impressive story about New Vasyuki, confirmed by carefully selected scientists
  3. +4
    1 June 2022 18: 24
    .close due to lack of real prospects.

    The prospect turned out to be not promising and, most importantly, costly .... no money, but you hold on wassat
  4. +4
    1 June 2022 18: 27
    fundamentally new solutions and principles were to be used in the SLRC program.
    I think after the fiasco of the railgun at Zamvolt, Congress is already afraid to invest in such "innovative" projects worth billions and zilch at the exit. In fact, they did the right thing, the technology is still raw, it is much more efficient to invest in more or less proven classic weapons systems hi
    1. 0
      1 June 2022 18: 31
      I think the point is not in technology, but in economics, a projectile for such a gun is not cheaper than a rocket, because this is a rocket. laughing But it has to be stuffed into a cannon, which means it is very thin, which means it is even more expensive than an ordinary rocket ....
      1. +1
        1 June 2022 19: 09
        The gun performs the work of the first stage of the rocket, while no energy is wasted to accelerate the mass of this first stage - fuel savings are more than 2 times. The cost of production, delivery and storage is lower, and the main thing is the increase in ammunition (in the number of shots) on a particular ship or combat vehicle.
        1. +4
          1 June 2022 22: 41
          But we can sign an additional order with a change in specification
          by materials, and tens of tons of raw materials will stay forever in
          contractor, and the cost of the contract will increase by two or three times to the original.
        2. +1
          2 June 2022 16: 49
          Quote: Genry
          The gun performs the work of the first stage of the rocket, while no energy is wasted to accelerate the mass of this first stage - fuel savings are more than 2 times.

          But the acceleration during acceleration in the barrel is much greater than during the operation of the first stage of a conventional rocket. Because the "first stage" of a projectile rocket, which is also a charge, accelerates the rocket only when moving inside the barrel. This means that the rocket-projectile must reach the same speed that its first stage gives to a conventional rocket over a much shorter distance - the length of the barrel.
          What does it mean? That's right: the higher the acceleration, the greater the forces acting on the projectile rocket. So - the more durable the case should be. Plus, the pressure of the gases in the barrel behind the projectile has its effect - which means that the aft part of the projectile must also be made stronger and thicker. Otherwise, it will be like on the Richelieu LK, which lost three main guns during the first live firing due to the destruction of the shells and the detonation of their explosives right in the barrel (due to the weak design of the aft part of the projectile).
          The result is that the shell of the projectile will have to be made much thicker than that of the rocket. And this is a decrease in the mass of explosives compared to a traditional rocket.
  5. +1
    1 June 2022 18: 35
    The article shows only one thing, the Pentagon knows how to cut bablos much cooler than our Ministry of Defense. Raising a budget to allocate funds for the development of a gun firing at 1.000 km is the highest skill
    1. +2
      1 June 2022 20: 07
      Stop talking nonsense about cutting the budget, conducted research, then technologies will come in handy, they have a network centric - but we don’t, it was also probably cut for research, and in twenty years the gun will appear, but not unas (((
      1. +1
        2 June 2022 17: 09
        Quote: dnestr74
        Stop talking nonsense about cutting the budget, conducted research, then technologies will come in handy, they have a network centric - but we don’t, it was also probably cut for research, and in twenty years the gun will appear, but not unas (((

        Oh, come on - there will be a gun. In the United States, more than half a century ago, experiments on ultra-long-range shooting were already carried out. Result? Almost the whole world has switched to 45-52 caliber 155-mm divisional artillery guns. In addition to the United States, they are once again upgrading the 39-caliber Lolodin. smile
      2. -2
        19 July 2022 17: 25
        What technologies!? laughing Jules Verne described all such technologies in great detail 150 years ago ... You have to be so illiterate to believe the joke about a cannon that shoots 1000 miles!
    2. +1
      1 June 2022 23: 51
      Quote: certero
      Raising the budget to allocate funds for the development of a gun firing at 1.000 km is the highest skill

      Let it be to you.
      We would take care of our budget, and you and the company are all about the American bake

      The US Army spent $62 million in FY21 evaluating various aspects of the technology required for a long-range cannon.

      For America, this is NOTHING. Husk.
      But expected
      2021: General Chief of Army Staff. James McConville said in a recent interview. “If we can develop a ☝️long-range strategic gun system, the cost of a shot could be as low as $400, or $000 compared to the cost of current multi-million dollar ammunition. Cost is key and we are concerned about cost. There are certain physical issues with doing these things, and that's a compromise."
      Apparently they are worried about their $.
      According to their calculations, this gun will save aviation from losses when overcoming the echeloned air defense of Russia and China, in the event of war. The gun is able to deliver the amount of ammunition that is CHEAPER than aviation, perhaps 12, 16 or 20 units, in time it will be able to deliver the amount of more affordable shells " , perhaps 12, 16, or 20 in a shorter amount of time (than air or cvd) to destroy the target.
      1. -2
        19 July 2022 17: 28
        the cost of a shot could be as low as $400, or $000 compared to the cost of current multi-million dollar ammunition
        Yes, of course ... see "Zamwalt"
    3. -1
      3 June 2022 10: 51
      They paid for the work of high-class engineers, which the country always needs. They have done research that may come in handy at the right time. In parallel, they may have made a number of engineering and technical discoveries, for example, in materials science, chemistry, and information technology. If we had such an approach, we would not have sent BMP1 and T62 to the SVO. And drones would be saturated. And they would not stick out near Donetsk in the third month from the day of the NWO.
  6. 0
    1 June 2022 18: 49
    Here they gave someone a hand .... they covered such a cut ...
  7. +1
    1 June 2022 20: 36
    Quote: Mitroha
    Research brings more profit than real production, since it practically does not require costs, only an impressive story about New Vasyuki, confirmed by carefully selected scientists

    That's for sure ... Chubais will not let you lie ... Or rather, he would not.
  8. +1
    1 June 2022 21: 09
    Zamwalt guns, now this ... Some kind of unhealthy desire to fire a rocket from a gun, although if you attach an accelerator and save on overload-resistant electronics and an engine, it will come out cheaper and will not require a heavy gun to fire.
  9. The comment was deleted.
    1. +3
      1 June 2022 21: 23
      Can you remember the tool? "Big Babylon" caliber 1000mm, barrel length 156m - designer Degerald Bull (Canadian)
      Proposed type of weapon "Big Babylon". It was planned to build 2 "Big Babylon".
      For a test in Iraq, they first began to create a weapon "Baby Babylon" caliber 350mm, barrel length 45m with range 750km.
      Gun range growth table.
      In 1990, D. Bull was killed ...
      sad
      1. 0
        2 June 2022 13: 52
        It is possible and V-3 3.P will remember. Bulle tucked into the V-3.
  10. -1
    1 June 2022 22: 02
    Most of all, people have succeeded in creating means of self-destruction ...
  11. +1
    1 June 2022 23: 10
    Is this a related project to the 155mm cruiser gun?
    1. +2
      2 June 2022 01: 06
      Parallel. Independent.
      This is the army, for the zamvolt-navy.
      They squabble among themselves.
      The Americans started tinkering with this weapon when the INF Treaty was in effect: it prohibited both sides from deploying ground-based cruise or ballistic missiles with a range of 310 to 3420 miles - they started tinkering with these weapons in order to bypass the INF Treaty. The contract has sunk into oblivion in 2019.
      They sank into this weapon.
      The INF Treaty did not apply to the zamvolta (sea-based) artillery system.
      Yes, and the caliber is “not the same”, not 155 mm .. but somewhere m / y 260 and 460mm


      This is the grandson of a 16 inch Canadian-American HARP from 1969 should have been
      (the projectile is different in principle)
  12. 0
    2 June 2022 06: 21
    Quote: dnestr74
    they have a network centric, but we don’t,

    What the hell do they have. in the exercises we also have everything
  13. +2
    2 June 2022 08: 51
    The PrSM operational-tactical complex and the hypersonic LRHW are also being developed.

    This is a normal replacement for ERCA.
  14. +1
    2 June 2022 11: 45
    Quote: certero
    The article shows only one thing, the Pentagon knows how to cut bablos much cooler than our Ministry of Defense. Raising a budget to allocate funds for the development of a gun firing at 1.000 km is the highest skill

    1000 nautical miles, 1852 km
  15. -2
    2 June 2022 11: 56
    Good project.
    Saw the Shura weight, it is golden! (With)
  16. +1
    2 June 2022 14: 58
    I drank pure water from the moment of conception. No, not even like that: from the moment when the father of this project, he even put his foot on the mother of this gun winked.
    The advantages of a gun over a rocket affect short distances, when a high muzzle velocity makes it possible to simplify the design of the projectile.
    In order to shoot at such distances, a completely crazy initial speed is needed, and developed over a fairly short period of time, limited by the long barrel. This, even with a modern element base, significantly complicates the design of guidance systems, without which it will be far from possible to shoot.
    Well, the mass and dimensions of the gun, the caliber of which will allow bringing something significant to the target, will not be weak.
    Everything that goes beyond the bottom gas generator in the end turns out to be irrational.
    What is the point of making a monstrous weapon if the main source of energy for flight is on the projectile. Then it is more rational to use a rocket, well, with a mortar launch.
    1. 0
      2 June 2022 17: 23
      Quote: Grossvater
      In order to shoot at such distances, a completely crazy initial speed is needed, and developed over a fairly short period of time, limited by the long barrel. This, even with a modern element base, significantly complicates the design of guidance systems, without which it will be far from possible to shoot.

      And what should be the strength of the body of a projectile accelerated with such acceleration? There will be nothing left for explosives at all - they will throw blanks. smile
      Quote: Grossvater
      Everything that goes beyond the bottom gas generator in the end turns out to be irrational.
      What is the point of making a monstrous weapon if the main source of energy for flight is on the projectile. Then it is more rational to use a rocket, well, with a mortar launch.

      And that's how it will work out in the end. The army will require an increase in the filling factor of the explosive projectile - which means that the walls of the projectile need to be made thinner. We reduce acceleration by lengthening the barrel - we run into the strength limits of the barrel materials and transport dimensions. The idea - let's reduce acceleration by accelerating the projectile outside the barrel! At the same time, we will reduce the mass of the accelerating charge and lighten the barrel. We put a gas generator - not enough. We put a full-fledged overclocking stage ... congratulations - we just invented bike ballistic missile launched from a tubular guide glass. laughing
  17. -1
    3 June 2022 10: 58
    Quote: cat Rusich
    You can recall the gun "Big Babylon" caliber 1000mm, barrel length 156m - designer Degerald Bull (Canadian)

    Yes, Israeli intelligence worked well then. And the designer is insanely talented, it was he who created the artillery of South Africa, which at one time was considered one of the best in the world
  18. 0
    3 June 2022 13: 29
    Supergun projects pop up with regularity. Walking on a rake.
    History teaches nothing - all superguns shoot successfully, but all projects have a terrible price / efficiency ratio!

    After all, we already got into such a situation once with an artillery mount from the destroyer Zamvolt - the LRLAP program. Then the cost of one 155mm projectile reached an astronomical amount of almost 1 million dollars (which is already quite comparable with the cost of a normal Tomahawk CD)!

    https://lenta.ru/news/2016/11/07/lrlap/
    Guided 155-millimeter shells for the guns of the Zamvolt ships turned out to be too expensive, and they will most likely have to be abandoned ... The most absurd thing in this situation, according to the sources of the publication, is that the projectile is fully developed and tested he does not have the slightest claim from future operators. The only thing they don't like is the price.
  19. 0
    19 July 2022 18: 03
    Actually, all analysts and skeptics from different countries were saying in unison that this would all end. Barrel artillery is good only at a price per shot.
  20. 0
    23 July 2022 09: 51
    M777ER does not have a thousand-mile project no relations. What's with her photo?
  21. 0
    23 August 2022 11: 15
    No one canceled the cuts anywhere ...
  22. 0
    28 August 2022 19: 22
    Our military budget sawers are boys compared to the US ones.