British SAM Stormer HVM for the Ukrainian army

30

SAM Stormer HVM on exercises, 2005

It became known that the UK plans to send a number of Stormer HVM anti-aircraft missile systems to Ukraine. With the help of such equipment, it is planned to strengthen the military air defense of the Ukrainian army and help it fight the Russian aviation. However, such assistance has a number of objective limitations, and its real effect is unlikely to suit the Kiev authorities.

According to the press


On April 18, The Sun reported on the new British assistance for Ukraine in the field of air defense. It cites unnamed sources in the UK and provides a number of interesting facts. Very bold assessments and forecasts are also made, which may not correspond to reality.



The Sun claims that two weeks ago, the British Ministry of Defense received a delegation from the Ukrainian army and showed them a modern weapon. At the Salisbury Plain training ground, the guests were shown the Stormer HVM self-propelled air defense system, which is in service with the British army. It was decided to transfer such equipment to Ukraine from the fleet of its own parts.

Defense Secretary Ben Wallace will reportedly address Parliament this week and formally announce the dispatch of the SAM. Then, within a few days, they can be loaded onto military transport aircraft and sent to the customer. It is assumed that, together with dozens of other armored vehicles from the UK, Stormer HVM systems will significantly affect the combat capability of the Ukrainian army.


The Sun writes only about plans and preparations for the supply of British air defense systems to Ukraine, but does not provide any details. In particular, the volumes of deliveries, the timing of the transfer of equipment, etc. were not named. In addition, there is no official confirmation of such information - although it fits into the logic of London's actions in recent weeks.

British Stormtrooper


History The Stormer HVM air defense system dates back to the mid-seventies, when the British Ministry of Defense placed an order for the development of a promising armored personnel carrier. The work on the project with the designation FV4333 and the name Stormer ("Stormtrooper") was entrusted to Alvis Vickers. According to the terms of the customer, the new armored personnel carrier was supposed to use the components and assemblies of a serial light tank FV101 Scorpion.

In the late seventies, development was completed and a prototype was built. In 1980-81. he passed all the tests, and the Sturmovik was put into service and put into serial production. The development of various modifications of the armored personnel carrier and new equipment based on it immediately began. First of all, carriers of specialized weapons were worked out.

In 1986, an order appeared for the development of a self-propelled military air defense air defense system with short-range light missiles. This version of the armored vehicle received the designation Stormer HVM (High Velocity Missile - “High-speed missile”). Despite the certain simplicity of such a project, the development was delayed. The tests were completed only in the mid-nineties, and in 1997 the army received the first air defense systems.


Launcher, rear view

For various reasons, the Stormer armored personnel carrier and equipment based on it were not built in a large series. In total, about 220 units were produced. Several dozen tracked chassis received anti-aircraft missiles and related equipment. According to The Military Balance, the British Army currently has 60 Stormer HVM air defense systems. This technique is still serviceable, but its age is constantly growing, and the resource is declining. Reportedly, now such equipment can be transferred to Ukraine.

From ready-made components


The Stormer HVM product is a self-propelled air defense system on a tracked chassis, designed for military air defense of the near zone. To simplify and speed up development, the project was made with extensive use of ready-made components, and only individual elements were re-created.

The FV4333 chassis has a welded armor hull with anti-bullet and anti-fragmentation protection. A Perkins T6 3544 diesel engine with an HP 250 power is placed in the front compartment of the hull. and mechanical transmission with the issuance of torque to the front drive wheels. Chassis - six-roller with torsion bar suspension.

On the roof of the Stormer HVM hull, a specially designed launcher with a turntable and two oscillating packages for missile containers is mounted. The design of the installation and its instruments ensures the launch of missiles in any direction with different elevation angles.

The air defense system also has an optical-electronic station, and two options were used. The first one is large and is made in a separate case, which is located on the roof of the car. The second ECO is made in the form of a compact "ball" and is located on the launcher.


Hull interior, view through the aft door

As a weapon, the Sturmovik uses a modified Starstreak MANPADS. The launcher accommodates eight TPKs with missiles of this type. Instead of a portable control unit, the OES and equipment inside the armored hull are used. At the same time, the principles of operation of the complex have not fundamentally changed.

The Starstreak missile has a sustainer stage with a solid propellant engine and a combat stage in the form of three separate homing submunitions. Each such element is a tungsten "dart" with a penetrating and fragmentation effect. The length of the rocket in the launch configuration is 1,4 m, weight is 14 kg. The combat element weighs 900 g. The maximum speed of the "darts" exceeds 3M. Flight range, depending on modification, 5-7 km.

Guidance of combat elements is carried out in a semi-automatic mode according to the principle of flight along the beam. The OES of the complex accompanies the target and directs a control laser beam at it. Elements are held in it and fly to the target. In the case of the Stormer HVM, unlike the basic MANPADS, part of the missile guidance operations are transferred to automation.

The Stormer HVM launcher has eight missiles - four in two packages. Another 12 are stored in the aft compartment of the hull. The installation is reloaded manually. The removal of empty TPKs and the installation of new ones take several minutes and are carried out by the crew.

Auxiliary armament of the Sturmovik includes two sets of smoke grenade launchers and the crew's personal weapons. In addition, there is a regular Starstreak MANPADS launcher on board. If necessary, it can be used with TPK and missiles from the general ammunition.


Start of a rocket

SAM Stormer HVM is controlled by a crew of three. The length of the vehicle is 5,6 m, the height is 3,4 m, the combat weight is 13,7 tons. On the highway, the vehicle develops a speed of 80 km / h and shows a cruising range of 600 km. Provided high mobility on land. Reservoirs are crossed only by fords.

Expected Problems


In the current situation, Ukraine is interested in obtaining any weapons and military equipment. However, such foreign assistance as a whole cannot change its situation - and the British Stormer HVM air defense systems will not be an exception. A number of objective factors will not allow the Ukrainian army to effectively use such equipment and obtain the desired results.

First of all, the lack of equipment will become a problem. The UK has only 60 complexes, and it is unlikely that all of them will go to Ukraine. At the same time, even 50-60 combat vehicles will not be able to affect the state of Ukrainian air defense. All of them will be quickly demilitarized by Russian strikes - as it has already been with a large number of Ukrainian own air defense systems.

A significant problem can be the age of technology. It is unlikely that the UK will give the newest cars, and the oldest samples were built in the second half of the nineties. In what condition they are and whether they meet the requirements is unknown.


Unlike a number of other foreign models, Stormer HVM will cause only limited difficulties in the field of crew training. The air defense system uses Starstreak missiles, already known to the Ukrainian army, which will speed up the training of operators. At the same time, full training of drivers and technical staff will be required. However, you can save money on the latter - the equipment is unlikely to have time to survive before maintenance or repair.

The actual combat qualities and capabilities of the Stormer HVM are questionable. The Ukrainian army has been using the British Starstreak MANPADS for several weeks, but their effectiveness remains extremely low. This is due both to objective technical limitations and to the specifics of the personnel. The installation of MANPADS on a self-propelled chassis provides certain advantages, but it is unlikely that the Ukrainian army will be able to implement them and get a different result.

It should be noted that the Stormer HVM systems will have to work in conditions of complete air supremacy of Russian aviation. At the same time, our planes and helicopters have all the necessary means of reconnaissance and weapons with sufficient range, which will allow them to detect and hit British air defense systems in a timely manner. There is every reason to believe that all "Stormtroopers" in a limited time will be destroyed or taken as trophies.

Doubtful help


Thus, the British Stormer HVM air defense systems will not bring much benefit to the Ukrainian army. Their number is insufficient, the technical condition is unknown, and the combat value is ambiguous. At the same time, the current situation contributes to the rapid loss of equipment, which exacerbates all other problems.

Great Britain in such a situation gets the opportunity to once again support the friendly Kiev regime, as well as get rid of not the newest and most successful model of equipment. Also, London may still be planning to advertise its Starstreak portable and self-propelled products. The UK is counting on political and commercial benefits. And this allows her to ignore the lack of benefit or potential problems for Kyiv.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    April 20 2022 17: 10
    Thus, the British Stormer HVM air defense systems will not bring much benefit to the Ukrainian army.

    1. +11
      April 20 2022 17: 53
      For the author, any transferred weapons are "not scary" ... "will not help" ... And so on.
      I’m even afraid to imagine how he would describe the supply of equipment by the allies through Lend Lease during the Second World War.
      1. -8
        April 20 2022 20: 38
        the Nazis have a lot of systems against helicopters and they shot down only one ka52 and this mi28 is not a fact that in Ukraine it could be in Syria and somewhere else for so long they shot down one helicopter and then it pulled out 18 hits of their hvolenov stinger, therefore, not effective and in general, I defend that such videos cannot be uploaded because this is our helicopter, people died there
        1. +1
          April 20 2022 21: 00
          If everything was as cool as you say, then Ukraine would not have had either air defense or aviation for a long time. However, Russian planes and helicopters are still being shot down and air battles are taking place.
          1. -5
            April 20 2022 21: 07
            air defense, they only have a question of how effective it is, how many thousands of stingers they have, and the defense ministry speaks of only one helicopter that withstood 18 stingers
          2. -1
            April 21 2022 16: 45
            What are you thinking..? What air battles?! There was not a single air battle at all, the complete dominance of Russian aviation in the air over Ukraine.
            Yes, literally several helicopters and planes of the Bandera air defense were shot down, which, in turn, is regularly suppressed. It is not clear what kind of air-air resistance on the part of Ukraine can be talked about ...
            1. +1
              2 July 2022 07: 04
              They periodically strike at us using aircraft. And that case of the passage of 2 helicopters and the strike already on our territory does not fit into any framework at all. What kind of dominance of our aviation can you talk about if target designations are transmitted to the ukram by the West
        2. +1
          April 20 2022 21: 01
          To make such bold statements, refer to photo and video materials from primary sources. In the said video, there is an off-screen voice of an elderly man with a Ukrainian accent. And the trees with huts are clearly not Syrian.
          There is a site oryx. There is a photo of the destroyed / damaged / captured equipment. Offhand "Kamovs" about ten, "Mile 28" - two.
          And this is with a photo evidence base!
          1. -2
            April 20 2022 21: 10
            photos and videos can be fakes the Ministry of Defense confirmed these photos or videos I haven’t seen but Ukrainians make fakes on a huge scale they can’t be trusted if we confirm that they shot down then yes and no these evidences are fakes there is a law on fakes for them you can go to jail to get in, why did they give me minuses
            1. 0
              April 21 2022 20: 41
              Not only Ukraine, but also Hollywood and Bollywood combined, cannot remove such a number of video fakes.
          2. +1
            April 21 2022 11: 35
            The problem with photography is that you can often shoot the same place from different angles. And sometimes just show something burning and claim that it is Russian. True, this will not work with the Ka-52. It is not clear, for example, what happened to the well-known car that ran down on the first day at Gostomel. Either she lies there, or ours took her away, or she was finished off. If ours were taken away, then it makes little sense to restore this, but at least part of the equipment can be removed. Well, no one canceled renderings even from computer games, then blur them with filters, so that you understand it.

            According to the same Su-34s, of which, according to the site, 4 pieces were shot down. but the Anglovics claim only two reliably shot down.

            Mi-28Ns rarely appear in vids, perhaps they were much less involved.
      2. +1
        April 20 2022 20: 57
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        For the author, any transferred weapons are "not scary" ... "will not help" ... And so on.
        I’m even afraid to imagine how he would describe the supply of equipment by the allies through Lend Lease during the Second World War.

        Yes, just remember any article about Lend-Lease with shouts in the comments what rubbish the Shermans were, that all weapons are terrible, stew is not needed, UG planes and all that. :waat:
    2. 0
      April 21 2022 11: 27
      Helicopters always suffer noticeable losses, only the Ukrainians and Soviet MANPADS were in abundance.
  2. +1
    April 20 2022 17: 26
    How much money did Roma Abramovich and his comrades invest in England? So this armament is worth nothing to England. We are being killed with our own money.
  3. -6
    April 20 2022 17: 31
    I think it might be worth hitting embassies or warning strikes with Calibers next to them.
    For everyone who supplies and repairs military equipment for Ukraine. Painfully at ease and comfortable they feel. You can even go to empty embassies in Kyiv, if the employees left for Lviv, and then there.
  4. +12
    April 20 2022 17: 34
    There is nothing worse than underestimating the enemy.
  5. +1
    April 20 2022 18: 02
    "All of them will be demilitarized by Russian strikes fairly quickly" - what are these stupid ephemisms for? Why not write "destroyed"?
    1. +4
      April 20 2022 19: 34
      When "destruction" is the sweat and blood of soldiers. And "demilitarization" is in the reports of the General Staff of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, according to which the Ukrainian army currently has a negative amount of forces and means.
  6. +4
    April 20 2022 19: 53
    I've seen reports of our drones being shot down by Starstreaks. They have a small thermal footprint and the Stinger is probably much more difficult to bring down.

    I don’t compare the economic effect, which is more expensive - one Orlan or StarStrick, since the latter got it for free, but there is definitely a military effect.
    1. +2
      April 20 2022 20: 16
      Quote: Proctologist
      I've seen reports of our drones being shot down by Starstreaks. They have a small thermal footprint and the Stinger is probably much more difficult to bring down.

      If about the video below, then this is a universal Martlet rocket. It is simpler, speed 1,5M, cumulative fragmentation warhead, laser beam guidance or laser illumination, infrared seeker in the final section.
      1. +1
        April 21 2022 07: 15
        Strangely, the British are presenting the LMM Martlet complex as the next after Starstreak-2. The missile has a slower speed (1,5M instead of 3,5M), one warhead instead of three for Starstreak. But it is equipped with a proximity fuse and has IR guidance in the final section of the flight.
  7. -4
    April 20 2022 20: 46
    Nothing will help them.
  8. 0
    April 21 2022 04: 59
    "Attack" from a helicopter is 10 km away, so reconnaissance, reconnaissance and reconnaissance again, so that nothing of iron would drive across the fields there
    Don't forget that shoulder stingers have somewhat shifted the balance in Afghanistan...
    1. IVZ
      0
      April 21 2022 11: 44
      The task of supplying weapons to Ukraine is not to help it - who needs it, but to weaken us. Including the impossibility of restoring relations with Ukraine in the future.
  9. -3
    April 21 2022 11: 52
    I am quite skeptical about the supply of air defense systems, because, unlike grenade launchers, they are quite difficult to master. And will the Ukrainians need air defense systems by mid-summer, another big question. Old tanks, like Leo-1 IMHO, should be even simpler. I simply don’t consider fighters, firstly, they can be destroyed during unloading, or flying to the airfield, there are few options for covert movement, secondly, there is simply nowhere to take pilots. There were hardly more than a few dozen actually combat-ready pilots even before the war.

    True, Andriy Vajra yesterday released a video about the Ukrainian army, in principle, it is difficult to argue with him in the sense that the Ukrainian army, with all its strength, has not yet been able to launch a single offensive, and whether it has this strength is still a big question. All strategic successes are sitting in cities, hiding behind civilians. The reservists of the first stage are only 120 thousand, the second 36 thousand, i.e., and there are not very many people in fact, given that the loss ratio for them now is hardly better than 10:1.

    And it’s not very clear to whom even the Polish T-72s should be given, more or less trained people who, with the availability of equipment, could still do something, have already been knocked out everywhere except for the Donbass, and now the conversation has gone, it seems simple, with us 10 guns and planes, the enemy has 1. The end in such conditions is a little predictable.
  10. +2
    30 May 2022 22: 45
    I saw a video of a falling SU-34. No fire, no smoke, nothing. The pilots ejected (2 pilots), the plane was destroyed by Starstreak - there was no flash or smoke on impact. Starstreak is a very good weapon. No traps help. The laser simply ignores them. It is IMPOSSIBLE to dodge it, especially for a helicopter, it flies one and a half times faster than the stinger. Nothing warns the pilot about laser irradiation. About the fact that he was noticed by an electron-optical station - too. A smoke screen would help against the starstrike, but it’s difficult to put it around a FLYING plane or helicopter. And AFFTOR just needs to sit in a trench or in equipment when "obsolete" weapons are being worked out on it. Sit in a trench that is fired upon by "Useless and obsolete" 105mm howitzers, or an "obsolete" 106.7mm mortar. You can sit in an armored personnel carrier or even in a dugout when the "Obsolete" Leopard 1 is working on it. You can fly on a turntable, for example, the Mi-8, and see PERSONALLY how "outdated and useless" the starstrike and stinger are. I recommend AFFTARU to lie down behind blocks of stones in Iraq, together with his squad, when the "outdated" MG-42 or the no less "outdated" DP-27 is working on them.

    Yes, and so the air defense of Banderostan, together with the Air Force, has long been "practically destroyed" ...
  11. 0
    8 June 2022 12: 51
    Quote: Baron Pardus
    And AFFTOR just needs to sit in a trench or in equipment when "obsolete" weapons are being worked out on it. Sit in a trench that is fired upon by "Useless and obsolete" 105mm howitzers, or an "obsolete" 106.7mm mortar. You can sit in an armored personnel carrier or even in a dugout when the "Obsolete" Leopard 1 is working on it. You can fly on a turntable, for example, the Mi-8, and see PERSONALLY how "outdated and useless" the starstrike and stinger are. I recommend AFFTARU to lie down behind blocks of stones in Iraq, together with his squad, when the "outdated" MG-42 or the no less "outdated" DP-27 is working on them.

    Yes, and so the air defense of Banderostan, together with the Air Force, has long been "practically destroyed" ...

    Not in the eyebrow but in the eye! It is necessary to prepare, study, analyze. And to throw hats, they tried it on 24.02.22/XNUMX/XNUMX already. It turned out so-so, they put the guys.
  12. 0
    12 June 2022 13: 35
    It is obvious that Ukraine and Zelensky are being driven into debt.
    Ukraine will never pay the debt, which means firm external management, etc.

    - "..80 km/h on the highway..."
    But where is the highway? The fighting is carried out in the semi-steppe and ravines with landings, in settlements ....
    - "... for military air defense of the near zone...."
    It has been reported for so long that Russian aircraft do not enter the enemy's air defense zone.
  13. 0
    21 June 2022 19: 48
    All of them will be quickly demilitarized by Russian strikes - as it has already been with a large number of Ukrainian own air defense systems.

    I don’t know how fast, but they will definitely shoot down a certain number of planes / helicopters, some of the pilots will die. And train them for about 5 years. Piece goods.
    In Russian-Japanese they said: yes, we will shower them with hats.
  14. 0
    6 July 2022 10: 16
    It should be noted that the Stormer HVM systems will have to work in conditions of complete air supremacy of Russian aviation.

    Information about the complex is useful, thanks to the author. The enemy must be known and studied! But this quote about "complete domination" is somehow embarrassing.