Mechanical grenade launcher MG-44

30

Mechanical grenade launcher MG-44

Trying to solve the problem of creating weapons, capable of carrying out a flameless and silent shot, providing a fairly high rate of fire, the All-Union Electrotechnical Institute of the NKEP presented its development to the military. It was a mechanical grenade launcher that the institute promoted by referring to the commander of the armored and mechanized troops of the Red Army, Marshal Yakov Nikolaevich Fedorenko.

The proposed military weapon was a centrifugal mechanical grenade launcher with a circular fire. The developed weapon was intended for firing with remote-action fragmentation grenades. The transfer of grenades of the required speed was carried out mechanically without the use of any explosives. The installation presented by the engineers of the All-Union Electrotechnical Institute was another attempt to create a centrifugal weapon.



Attempts to create a "centrifugal weapon"


The very idea of ​​creating such a weapon arose long before the Second World War. For example, back in the years of the American Civil War in 1861-1865, attempts were made to create a centrifugal machine gun. There was a legend that the Confederates even made a similar machine gun with a steam engine. At least, the drawings of such weapons with a steam drive really survived, but whether such a machine gun was built in reality is a big question.

Later, they returned to the development of such weapons at the beginning of the 1908th century. For example, back in XNUMX, engineer Bezobrazov presented a project for a centrifugal gun in the Russian Empire. The military did not appreciate the submitted project and treated it as wary as possible.

The artillery system itself, which did not use gunpowder, and the shells were placed on a peculiar version of a vertically mounted wheel, caused skepticism. When the wheel was spinning, the shells rushed to the target by inertia, while the accuracy and accuracy demonstrated during the tests remained below the expectations of the designer and the military.


French centrifugal bomber 1915, photo: strangernn.livejournal.com

Work in the field of creating such weapons was intensified already during the First World War. To develop a simple and silent weapon that could throw various ammunition at the enemy was the steady desire of many designers. A variant of such a bomb-launcher, resembling a centrifuge in appearance, was presented in France in 1915. In the same year, in Russia, Leonid Kurchevsky presented his project on a given topic, at that time not yet a well-known weapons designer, but only a laboratory assistant at the Moscow Pedagogical Institute.

The mechanical sling proposed by Kurchevsky was a fairly massive machine with a long bar that rotated on a horizontal axis. The device threw a hand grenade weighing 716 grams at 200-210 steps, which was enough for a positional war. However, the tests performed showed insufficient reliability of the device. Not all grenades flew in the direction of the target, some flew in the opposite direction, and one hit the parapet. In combat conditions, this was unacceptable. In 1916, this project was finally frozen.

In the Soviet Union, work on the creation of "centrifugal weapons" continued throughout the 1920s and 1930s in two main directions. The first still assumed the creation of "centrifugal machines for throwing shells", and the second involved the creation of machine guns. A similar project was promoted in 1927 by N.P. Chulkov, who received a patent for his device, which in fact turned out to be very complicated. The throwing rotor alone included more than 70 parts. At the same time, already at the project stage, the proposed weapon lost its simplicity, rate of fire and reliability.

At about the same time, such developments were carried out in many countries of the world. Among other things, models of centrifugal machine guns were also developed, but all developments in the USA and Japan ended in nothing. English developments in the mid-1930s also did not lead to the emergence of a working model of a centrifugal machine gun. More details about all the developments of such weapons in the first half of the 2021th century can be found in the article by Alexei Ardashev, which was published in the March issue of the Science and Technology magazine for March XNUMX.

What was the MG-44 mechanical grenade launcher


A model of a mechanical grenade launcher developed during the Great Patriotic War and brought to testing has survived to us in the form of photographs and a report on the test results. The mechanical grenade launcher, designated MG-44, was intended for throwing disc-shaped grenades. Throwing grenades at the enemy was supposed to be due to the action of centrifugal force without the use of any explosives.


Mechanical grenade launcher MG-44 on a Willys MB jeep

The photographs preserved in the TsAMO RF archives show that the mechanical grenade launcher was mounted on the chassis of a Willys MB off-road passenger car. It is suggested that it was the Willis engine that was planned to be used to power the installation. The memorandum states that in addition to the automobile chassis, it was proposed to place a mechanical grenade launcher on tanks and armored boats. It was also supposed to consider the possibility of applying the development in aviation.

It was assumed that the calculation for servicing the MG-44 would be two people. Aimed fire could be carried out both with single shots and with massive fire from closed and open positions. At the same time, the developers stated that pointing a mechanical grenade launcher at a target and firing at moving targets could be carried out without reducing the rate of fire.

To communicate a grenade weighing 500 grams of the required speed, a rotating disk with a leading channel was used, while all grenades were placed in rectangular clips designed for five shots. Grenades from clips could be fed continuously one after another. It is known that the presented experimental mechanical grenade launcher MG-44 was officially tested at the training ground of the NIPSMVO GAU of the Red Army from May 11 to May 26, 1944.

According to the conclusion of the staff of the research site, the grenade launcher was quite well developed. The technically presented design provided reliable, safe and trouble-free throwing of grenades in a given direction. This alone was a big step forward compared to numerous early developments in this direction. In conclusion, it was indicated that further workflow to find a more tactically acceptable form of centrifugal mechanism is appropriate.

Separately, the main combat properties of the grenade launcher stood out: rate of fire up to 500 rounds per minute; the absence of a flash when firing and noiselessness, which ensured the secrecy of the application; the high steepness of the trajectory made it possible to fire at short distances; firing range ranged from 200 to 1100 meters. Separately, a large supply of transportable ammunition stood out, which was ensured by the absence of cartridge cases and gunpowder, the disk-shaped grenades themselves were quite compact.

Mechanical grenade launcher MG-44
Mechanical grenade launcher MG-44 on trials, photo from the forum site g503.ru

There is no information in the public domain about the future fate of the mechanical grenade launcher being developed. In turn, we can say for sure that even despite the flattering reviews based on the test results, it did not reach mass production. As with all previous attempts to create a centrifugal weapon. Most likely, the largely exotic model was no longer of such great importance at the final stage of the war, which the Red Army and the allies were clearly winning.

Also, the expediency of this weapon was undermined by the appearance after the end of the Second World War of numerous hand grenade launchers, with which it was possible to equip a mass of infantrymen. The appearance of mass underbarrel grenade launchers for small arms and automatic heavy grenade launchers also did not contribute to maintaining the interest of the military in unusual developments in this area.

Attempts to create centrifugal weapons went into the civilian sphere


Despite the fact that none of the attempts to create a military model of centrifugal throwing weapons reached its logical conclusion, interest in this topic did not disappear. For example, in 1963, the American inventor Warren Worthes proposed his project of a single-shot centrifugal gun, which also did not gain any fame.

The most successful work in this direction ended in South Africa, where non-lethal weapons were created. At the height of apartheid politics in the 1980s, a local company, TFM Pty, introduced its own device to arm the police. The created “automotive rubber bullet thrower” was installed on police vehicles and was intended to disperse demonstrations, rallies and any other unauthorized mass events.


Modern baseball machine, photo ebay.com

The device consisted of two horizontal grooved disks and a hopper containing rubber balls. The spinning of the discs was tied to the operation of the car engine. Throwing rubber balls were spun up to a speed of 80 m/s. A hit with such a 100-gram rubber ball could stop any protester even at a distance of more than XNUMX meters from a police car.

But the truly demanded centrifugal throwing apparatus turned out to be not in the military, but in the civilian sphere. Numerous simulators and machines for throwing balls are not much different from the development created in South Africa. Such machines have proven their effectiveness in tennis, softball and baseball, being indispensable assistants to athletes during training sessions.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    23 February 2022 05: 06
    Thank you hi, did not know about such a technical curiosity recourse .Although I heard about one enthusiasm that the electric machine gun itself literally made in the barn !! It seems like in 42 he went to some of our testing grounds, he didn’t go to the troops, but all the information about him was classified, and the creator was employed in one weapons design bureau!!! hi
    1. +1
      23 February 2022 09: 40
      In the Museum of the Soviet Army, a similar device was exhibited, which threw hand grenades, partisan homemade.
  2. -4
    23 February 2022 06: 09
    After reading. For a long time I could not decide on the assessment of this "monster". Probably all the same "mind games" or "woe from wit"! Everything is too complicated and cumbersome!!!
    1. 0
      23 February 2022 07: 22
      But, you must admit - original and interesting, damn it!)
      I have never heard of such a direction!
      1. 0
        23 February 2022 16: 03
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        But, you must admit - original and interesting, damn it!)
        I have never heard of such a direction!

        I do not argue with this! Everything spoils the external power supply.
        For the rest, I read about attempts to convert pancake throwing clay plates into steel ones with remote control. It is not for nothing that manufacturers of such devices have been leaving the arbitrary guidance system mechanical, not electronic, for half a century!
    2. -1
      23 February 2022 22: 18
      Quote: Kote Pan Kokhanka
      After reading. For a long time I could not decide on the assessment of this "monster". Probably all the same "mind games" or "woe from wit"! Everything is too complicated and cumbersome!!!

      I often look at YouTube excavations at the sites of hostilities, and so on one video where the remains of Soviet soldiers were dug up near Leningrad, there were rubber balls with a chemical compound, they were also thrown, and if they hit from a blow, a chemical reaction occurred and the enemy’s equipment ignited
  3. +1
    23 February 2022 07: 05
    What to say? Suitable for police purposes. Any range is greater than that of a water cannon. All sorts of ammunition can be muddied into the nomenclature. Allows you to throw grenades in plastic cases...
    Greenpeace people just don't show it!
    1. 0
      23 February 2022 07: 38
      Quote: Kerensky
      What to say? Suitable for police purposes. Any range is greater than that of a water cannon. All sorts of ammunition can be muddied into the nomenclature. Allows you to throw grenades in plastic cases...
      Greenpeace people just don't show it!

      Water cannons are still not lethal machines if they are used at positive air temperatures.
      A similar self-propelled mortar throwing special ammunition of 500 grams - I'm afraid it will be dangerous.
      Better than the old fashioned way.

      Special carbine - KS23.
      1. 0
        23 February 2022 08: 11
        Water cannons are still not lethal machines, if they are used at positive air temperature.

        HM! If the fire aviation of Ukraine had worked on the Maidan (but don’t burn fires!), Then it would have ended. There would be no casualties. But this WOULD...
        A similar self-propelled mortar throwing special ammunition of 500 grams - I'm afraid it will be dangerous.

        And I was already dreaming about aerosol ammunition that works at the top of the trajectory. Even at 80 m / s initial (and the range there can be adjusted over a wide range) it will turn out great.
        The centrifugal force of the grenade rotation puts it on a combat platoon, we control the maximum point of the trajectory with a barometer .. Even a parachute can be attached at 500 gr. meet.
        1. +1
          23 February 2022 12: 49
          m! If the fire aviation of Ukraine had worked on the Maidan (but don’t burn fires!), Then it would have ended. There would be no casualties. But this WOULD...

          As a specialist, I answer that if people fell under the shaft of several tons of water dropped from an airplane from a height of 200-250 meters, then most of them died. Sprinkling with rain from fire hoses is also effective (the crowd will turn these cars over - it was proven back in the USSR). Therefore, the demonstrators are working at point-blank range (in a straight line).
          What you suggest is not our method and is expensive. There are other special devices to spray (for example: chloropicrin) in a crowd. But this is a separate issue and application is possible only with the permission of the Minister of the Interior.
          1. +1
            23 February 2022 13: 02
            As a specialist, I answer that if people fell under the shaft of several tons of water dropped from an airplane from a height of 200-250 meters, then most of them died.

            Vladislav.
            As a former head of the operational-rescue detachment of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, I say - figs would be there. Take train 500 and everything will be drops ... And aerosol grenades with pear acid derivatives ... well, yes, the same chloropicrin, CS-2, ammonia ...
            You can also add "Drift" ...
            1. 0
              23 February 2022 13: 41
              I have the honor! hi
              Then about the "cloud" and "cloud" they should have heard unambiguously!
              On the use of aviation, he personally wrote in his notes that there was no chance of surviving under the mass of water dropped by a fire plane. After dropping water from a helicopter - yes. They drove it into our heads at the TSP thoroughly - killing young nonsense “why special equipment (avalanches and aquarians), and we are with airplanes or fire engines.
              In Ukraine, this Maidan could have been swept away even in the bud with “six Polish water cannons of the Kiev detachment of explosives” and banal rubber sticks. There were not enough “strong eggs at the top”, now the culprit is holed up with us in Rostov!
              However, it is surprising that ours did not play the “Borka for the Kingdom” card!
              1. 0
                23 February 2022 15: 41
                On the use of aviation, he personally wrote in his notes that there was no chance of surviving under the mass of water dropped by a fire plane. After dropping water from a helicopter - yes

                What an infection! Yes, it's too late .. 2.5 tons in aerosol, but in "fierce" (February)
            2. +1
              23 February 2022 15: 29
              Quote: Kerensky
              same chloropicrin, CS-2, ammonia ...
              You can also add "Drift" ...

              I remember there was another interesting gas from the French in the 70s, which made the intestines empty, the Israelis have a similar thing called "Skunk"
              1. +1
                23 February 2022 15: 46
                I remember there was another interesting gas from the French in the 70s,

                Aha! Same CS.
                If I shoot riot balls...
      2. +1
        23 February 2022 15: 04
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        Water cannons are still not lethal machines if they are used at positive air temperatures.

        Yes? what was the temperature in Kiev? I agree it’s not lethal, but pneumonia would be like a drink, because if you let it rain, you get wet through in a matter of minutes, and it’s not convenient to stand in wet clothes.
        1. 0
          23 February 2022 15: 51
          but pneumonia would be like a drink, because if you let it rain, you get wet through in a matter of minutes, and it’s not convenient to stand in wet clothes.

          And it’s also uncomfortable to make a noise. Everyone would calmly go home.
          I have 11 pneumonias in history..
  4. +5
    23 February 2022 08: 07
    Well ... and they got to the magazine "Technology-Youth"! I remember that they wrote a lot about centrifugal machine guns and grenade launchers! Although ... it could be written in w. "Model designer" and even in "Young Technology" (!) ... the topic was popular in pioneer and youth magazines! wink All these "centrifugal guns" could be divided into 2 groups ...: 1. "centrifuges" and 2. weapons that have some elements of traditional weapons ... Let's touch on the second group a little!

    1963 Warren W. Waters throwing gun

    Gorshkov centrifugal machine gun
    And of course, you can’t do without a grenade launcher!

    1943. Mechanical grenade launcher S. Brandt!
    1. +3
      23 February 2022 08: 25
      I wanted, at the same time, to expose the lies that the first revolving hand grenade launcher was made in South Africa, and then everyone else began to imitate! Here is a revolving manual (carried with his own hands!) Kulakov grenade launcher from the time of the Second World War!
      1. 0
        23 February 2022 12: 08
        Volodya hi don’t be cunning, was the Kulakov grenade launcher adopted and put into mass production?
        In my opinion, this elephant is still from South Africa. wink

        40 mm South African MGL grenade launcher
        milkor.com
        As for the rest;
        Around the same time, their analogues of such weapons appeared in the United States. Externally, the MM-1 of the American company Hawk Engineering looked the same as the 37-mm South African prototype, which is not at all accidental. It is difficult to say who can be called pioneers in this field, since both of them took an example from Charles Manville's automatic revolver gun, patented back in 1937 and shown in the American film "Dogs of War" in 1980. However, it was the South Africans who were able to create a sample from a bulky multiply charged product that was acceptable in terms of dimensions and characteristics.


        37/38 mm grenade launchers: American MM-1 (top) and South African MGL (bottom)
        gunbroker.com
        And later we got our own, original version of the six-shot revolver-grenade launcher - RG-6 "Gnome".
        1. +1
          23 February 2022 12: 20
          Oh, Kostya, Kostya! This story was spoiled for me by "The song, not the story! Well, why didn't they accept ... these are the problems of the military (!) ... (the problems of the "Indians" of the "sheriff" do not care!) The main thing that they did! fellow bully
          1. +1
            23 February 2022 12: 26
            I'm sorry, brother, I did not mean to offend, just for the sake of justice. smile
            As for the rest ... we even came up with a "bazooka" before the war, but what's the point - they threw themselves under the tanks with bottles. request
            1. -2
              23 February 2022 16: 25
              Quote: Sea Cat
              As for the rest ... we even came up with a "bazooka" before the war, but what's the point - they threw themselves under the tanks with bottles.

              And what's the use of a bazooka without kuma?
              We have been trying to make a cumulative projectile since the time of the Spanish events, when in 1937 they received information about the presence of an armor-burning projectile in the German army and about the German patent for such a projectile. Such monsters as the Leningrad Chemical-Technological Institute, the Artillery Academy of the Spacecraft, Research Institute No. 6 (the former Military Chemical NTI of the USSR People's Commissariat of Heavy Industry and the future Central Research Institute of Chemistry and Mechanics) and the NKV Ostekhburo worked on the topic. Result - for April 1942, the data of the work did not lead to positive results.
              1. +1
                23 February 2022 21: 26
                on the presence in the German army of an armor-burning projectile

                it's not just a name. In reality, at first they tried to create armor-burning compositions due to a misunderstood process of breaking through armor.
                Although the cumulative effect was then generally known.
              2. 0
                23 February 2022 21: 55
                Quote: Alexey RA

                We have been trying to make a cumulative projectile since the time of the Spanish events,
                . Result - for April 1942, the data of the work did not lead to positive results.
                Cumulative shot 76mm.
                Developed at the beginning of 1942, it appeared in the 76mm regimental gun ammunition at the beginning of 1943, but was not used due to problems with the fuse.
                Cumulative shot 122mm for howitzers.
                Designed in 1942, put into production in early 1943. Used in the Battle of Kursk.
                RBSK-82
                Rocket 82mm with a cumulative funnel, designed for IL-2 in 1942.
                They were not accepted into service.
                PTAB-2,5-1,5
                Development began in mid-1942. Tested and put into service in April 1943.
                I just want to say that for a situation where in April 1942 no positive results - at the end of 1942 - the beginning of 1943, there are already several ready-made and adopted samples cumulative ammunition - very strange...
                Not all godfathers went to the front - the lack of suitable fuses and the lack of experience in the design of such ammunition affected, but the work continued and they were "not put an end to."
                hi
                1. 0
                  24 February 2022 11: 17
                  Quote: cat Rusich
                  I just want to say that for a situation when there are no positive results in April 1942 - in late 1942 - early 1943 there are already several samples of cumulative ammunition ready and put into service - it’s very strange ...

                  Apparently the expression no results refer to works on the reproduction of the German patent.
                  But in the same document it is written that in March 1942 a cumulative projectile for a German 76 mm tank gun was found, which is close in design to the projectile being worked out in the GAU Artkom and NII-6 NKV. PMSM, this was the reason for the acceleration of work - dead-end directions were cut off and a priori workable design was chosen, which was further developed.
                  From the spring to the autumn of 1942, the armor penetration of the domestic 76-mm HEAT projectile was raised from "does not penetrate armor 50 mm thick" to confident penetration of 60 mm armor at an encounter angle of 90 degrees. This value is fixed in the "Instructions on firing and using 76 mm armor-burning shells for a regimental gun model 1927" dated 03.09.1942/XNUMX/XNUMX.
                  Quote: cat Rusich
                  Developed at the beginning of 1942, it appeared in the 76mm regimental gun ammunition at the beginning of 1943, but was not used due to problems with the fuse.

                  Judging by the instructions for the use of armor-piercing 76-mm shells, signed by the deputy commander of artillery of the 2nd Guards Army Colonel Pashkevich on 31.01.1943/XNUMX/XNUMX, at this time these shells have already arrived and are actively used, and often not for their intended purpose - they are spent for firing at unarmored targets.
                  And judging by the documents of the GAU (No. 600013s of 12.01.1944/76/353), 1927-mm armor-piercing shells of steel cast iron BP-1942A for regimental guns mod. XNUMX served in the troops from October XNUMX
              3. 0
                27 February 2022 06: 01
                Quote: Alexey RA
                Result - as of April 1942, these works did not lead to positive results.

                Probably because then they were not yet able to establish the necessary production of explosives with the required detonation speed ..
      2. 0
        27 February 2022 05: 58
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        Kulakov grenade launcher from WWII!

        it seems to be one of the examples of weapons that were made according to a "letter from the front" ... but it didn’t go further than prototypes ...
  5. +4
    23 February 2022 08: 57
    The proposed military weapon was a centrifugal mechanical grenade launcher with a circular fire. The developed weapon was intended for firing with remote-action fragmentation grenades.

    Yes, such a weapon has been offered more than once, once upon a time even in "UT" it was. The accuracy of such a device is low, requires an external source of energy, the speed of the projectiles is limited.
    1. 0
      3 March 2022 23: 57
      At the level of rumors from the field - centrifugal throwing is used by the Israeli police. Device in the form of a curved tin tray. The motorcycle is put on a prop, with the rear wheel towards the crowd of Arabs, they spin it in reverse, to full throttle, and ordinary rubble is poured onto the wheel. Getting on the wheel, he accelerates and flies for about 100m, putting hefty bruises. And no traces - stones are lying around, so what? Unlike the "South African" rubber balls, there is nothing to shoot for complaints.