Steam locomotive for war

68

Do you think that General Frost stopped the Wehrmacht near Moscow?

But not only him!



At least in the notes of the commander of the Army Group "Center" von Bock there is an entry dated 7.12.1941/XNUMX/XNUMX:

“... Paralysis of the railways. Lack of vehicles, wagons, locomotives and trained personnel. Insufficient adaptability of locomotives and motor vehicles to the conditions of the Russian winter ... "

Well, everything is clear with winter, but where did it come from? a lack of?

On August 10, 1941, Germany had 23 steam locomotives, the USSR - 400. Almost parity.

But, if you believe the documents of the Nuremberg trials, then: “... they destroyed, damaged and took away 15 steam locomotives and motor locomotives, as well as 800 wagons” ... (Document of the USSR - 428).

Here, however, it is necessary to clarify.

These 15,8 thousand included everything that could move (locomotives, narrow-gauge locomotives, motorized tires, and so on). Many of them did not even try to evacuate.

According to a study by historians of the NKPS, from the summer of 1941 to the first quarter of 1943, about 3 locomotives were lost. And they captured, according to the German historian of railway transport Reinhard, about 900 steam locomotives.

In general, not so much to establish uninterrupted transport links in the occupied territories.

And if we add to this a motley fleet of inherited locomotives, different gauges and the partisan movement that began already in the fall of 1941 ...

A total loss.

The Germans tried to increase the power of their steam locomotives by 14%, but this only led to the imminent failure of the latter. You can drive not only horses.

At the end of 1941, the length of railway lines, including the occupied territories, reached its maximum for Germany, and already in December, at a meeting, Adolf Hitler directly stated the need to create a military steam locomotive:

“... No miracles of technology! Simple machines are required that can withstand five years of operation!”

In March, the production of locomotives was placed under the control of Minister of Armaments Albert Speer.

A Main Rolling Stock Committee was also created.

The first thing that was adopted was a reduction in the range of steam locomotives. Only three series were left: 44, 50 and 86. Heavy, medium and shunting locomotives.

At the request of the military, the new locomotive was supposed to move a train weighing 1 tons at a speed of 200 km / h.

Given the not the best state of communications during the hostilities, the choice was made on the pre-war BR 50 series with an axial formula 1-5-0.

I bring an image.


This locomotive was created in 1939 and is considered very successful.

The first cars came out of the gates of the Henschel factory. Later, Krupp and Krauss Maffei joined in. Until the end of the year, 218 cars were assembled. Then they began to produce at other enterprises.

What was the military principle of Krigslok?

This is how a military steam locomotive is most often called in German literature.

First of all, simplification.

The water heater, large smoke shields, and second sandboxes for supplying sand to the wheel-rail contact zone during locomotive boxing were removed from the original prototype.

Of the 6 parts, about 000 were removed, and 1 were modernized. This led to a decrease in the total consumption of materials by 000 tons, including the consumption of non-ferrous metals decreased from 3 tons to 000 kg!

These measures allowed to reduce labor costs in time by half.

On September 12, 1942, the first military steam locomotive left the gates of the Borsig plant and made a test run of over 5 km through Germany and the occupied countries for propaganda purposes.

Soon, other steam locomotive enterprises, including some factories in Austria, France, the Czech Republic and Poland, joined the production of these locomotives. And even shipyards made boilers for these machines.

From 1942 to May 8, 1945, 6 steam locomotives of the 161nd series were produced.

In addition to simplifications, some technical innovations should be noted in locomotives.

Some of the locomotives were equipped with a special wheel mounting design, which made it possible to quickly change the gauge. Well, you understand which country was meant.

1 machines were supplied with the so-called "protection against cold" - boilers, cylinders, part of pumps and pipelines were insulated with glass wool and covered with protective covers.

The locomotive and tender were connected by Norwegian-type canvas furs, and steam heating coils were laid under the floor and seats.

On the front sheet there was a box for ... heating food. Even so.

Later narrow smoke detectors were returned to Witte. Three different species are mentioned.

Military locomotives were painted grey. Those who were photographed in black and white photos for propaganda purposes - in light blue.

In the occupied territories of the USSR, steam locomotives of the 52nd series entered five imperial transport directorates and four military field teams. On the locomotives serving the eastern front, an inscription under the stencil DR-Ost (from German “railway East”) was applied.

The brigades consisted of a driver and a stoker, but the mechanic was always a German.

Estimated fuel for the 52nd series is high-calorie coal from Germany or Silesia. This was due to the small volume of the furnace - 6,9 cubic meters. True, the realities made their own adjustments - they had to be mixed with Donetsk, but at the same time, the thrust dropped significantly.

These machines, apparently, were valued - they entered the line most often during the day, at a speed of 30-60 km / h with trains of no more than 1 tons.

In 1943, 53 locomotives of the 52nd series were sold to Turkey.

In the same year, our railroad workers also met them.

But already as with trophies. The locomotives were well received. Later they were given the designation "Te" (trophy type "E"). The machinists called them "Teshka" or "Frau".

After the end of the war, about 4 type 000 steam locomotives ended up in the territories of 52 countries. Most of them are on the routes of the USSR and Poland.

At the Ivano-Frankivsk Locomotive Repair Plant, 36 locomotives were assembled from parts of damaged machines. "Teshki" worked in the west of the USSR until the mid-70s.

And the heirs of the 52nd series served the GDR for the longest time. The factories of East Germany carried out modernization and improvement of these hard workers, but in the mid-80s, by a single order, they were all put into reserve and mothballed. The figure of 120 locomotives is mentioned.

Now military locomotives can be seen in some museums and on the pedestals of monuments - however, there are only five of them.

There are military vehicles, planes, ships... And there was also a military locomotive.

Brief TTX:
The mass of the locomotive is 86 tons.
Power - 1 l / s.
Design speed - 80 km / h.
Operational - 65 km / h.

Steam locomotive for war
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +37
    2 February 2022 18: 06
    I continue.
    As usual, thanks to all the commenters. By the way, with this article I am answering one of the reader’s questions on which steam locomotives the Germans used to move goods in the occupied territories.
    1. +5
      2 February 2022 18: 27
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      As usual, thanks to all the commenters. By the way, with this article I am answering one of the reader’s questions on which steam locomotives the Germans used to move goods in the occupied territories.

      And how did they deal with different gauges on the border of Europe and the USSR?
      Did you change wagon bogies? How about a locomotive? Or just locomotives changed?
      1. +14
        2 February 2022 18: 31
        In some places there were "transshipment" points, in some places the rails were "altered" to fit the western size. Sometimes up to 20 km per day. But more often, all the same, the locomotives were altered. I mentioned this possibility. I can't say for the wagons yet.
    2. +8
      2 February 2022 18: 40
      But initially the German used other brands of locomotives.
      They could also use various European trophies.
      Or did they dream of reaching the pre-war groundwork?
      It turns out that the German had more order in the railway sector than in the automotive industry!
      The railway workers were satisfied with 3 models of steam locomotives, but the automakers did not want to produce the most standardized cars. And each car factory produced what its management wanted, and not the Wehrmacht.
      And all attempts to start production of strictly defined models ended in failure!
      1. +16
        2 February 2022 18: 48
        O! No))) Before the war, the Germans had a VERY diverse fleet of steam locomotives. But, strictly classified. Yes, and these three classes - included small subgroups.
        And they reduced, in the likeness, the military standardization of cars.
        1. +4
          2 February 2022 20: 14
          The standardization of the German railway workers was much better than their colleagues from the automotive industry!
          The German auto industry could not standardize from the word at all!
    3. +4
      2 February 2022 19: 58
      Cool article - non-standard to General Frost! Respect.
      1. +4
        2 February 2022 21: 04
        Igor is really well done, progressing from work to work. In his place, I would still add the performance characteristics of "shaitan-arb". I think the works of the Author would have received some completeness hi
        1. +3
          3 February 2022 10: 11
          Igor is really well done, progressing from work to work.

          I join the kind words regarding the esteemed Author. I propose a topic - German pre-war diesel locomotives. EMNIP, all German armored trains used against the USSR in 1941 were diesel-powered.
    4. +5
      2 February 2022 21: 40
      They write that the Germans handed over 237 captured locomotives to the Finns!
    5. +5
      2 February 2022 22: 32
      Igor, good evening and thank you! smile

      I read it with interest and pleasure, I never thought that the text would capture, not my topic at all. good
      Pay attention to this nuance:
      And even shipyards made boilers for these machines.

      It turns out that by forcibly loading the capacities of shipbuilding plants, the Germans limited the production of products necessary for the fleet. I don’t know how much, but even here it turned out to be a “bottleneck”.
      Well, the partisans, of course. smile

  2. +6
    2 February 2022 18: 15
    Thanks, very interesting .
  3. +6
    2 February 2022 18: 22
    Thanks for the great stuff. Here are some more photos!
  4. +4
    2 February 2022 18: 26
    Was there no assistant driver in the brigade? That is, the stoker worked on the tender, the driver at the controls, the mechanic, of course. Who was on the left? I don't think the stoker worked there all the time. Moreover, the locomotive was simplified.
    1. +3
      3 February 2022 05: 15
      Quote: 210ox
      mechanic of course

      Actually, the mechanic is the assistant driver
      1. 0
        3 February 2022 06: 07
        From the Germans? This is stated in the article - exclusively German. I think it has other functions. However, I agree with you.
        1. 0
          4 February 2022 13: 19
          Quote: 210ox
          From the Germans?

          I think this is due to the technical side, because each model has its own characteristics of operation, and control, of course...
  5. +5
    2 February 2022 18: 27
    A plus. We often have warriors, especially couch ones, who like to show off their minds about "I would instantly smash everyone with a throw to the ocean," but they just forget about supply logistics. But often it is the work of the rear that affects the course of not only one operation, but the war as a whole. Yes
    I read it with interest, the material can also be useful to victims of the USE if they have the inclinations of logical thinking smile hi
    1. +12
      2 February 2022 19: 28
      Quote: Rurikovich

      I read it with interest, the material can also be useful to victims of the USE if they have the inclinations of logical thinking smile hi

      From whom, but not from you Rurikovich, I expected to read a "hype" comment - of the level "all dunduks - I'm smart."
      At one time, as a parent, I tried to pass the USE test in history. Not easy enough. Therefore, it is unfounded to find fault with the youth? How are you different from the "sofa"?
      I personally learned about the hero of the article about five years ago, and then because of the costs of the profession. However, from the victim of the Unified State Examination, a 2nd year student of the railway institute.
      More than sure, many people read about an ersatz steam locomotive or a train for the first time and does it change anything? I think no.
      By the way, discrediting children by the need to pass the last exam, they are also the most extreme in this "circus".
      1. +4
        2 February 2022 20: 06
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        From whom, but not from you Rurikovich, I expected to read a "hype" comment - of the level "all dunduks - I'm smart

        Welcome hi To be honest and put my hand on my heart, I was simply fed up and lazy. It just got to the point that I just read articles, and if I do comment, then only what really catches feel This short review is rather a tribute to the author, as a reminder to him that he is being read.
        I won’t refuse the turnover of the “USE victim”, because despite the apparent complexity of the tests, now they can simply teach you to say and guess correctly. All the same (my personal opinion) in vain they abandoned the Soviet system of passing exams.
        Because the word "hype" I think is not applicable to me wink drinks
        I do not argue, there are a lot of young people who want to study, but the education system itself does not allow them to open up. All the same, pointing your finger at the right point is not thinking figuratively, logically, creatively approaching the solution of a problem, arguing your decision.
        The collapse of education is the collapse of the nation, alas ... And I am not criticizing the "victims of the USE" themselves, but the education system. They would look less at the West, their own nation would not degrade. And then they don’t go to the toilet without a phone. And even now I read every month 2-3 books of 350-400 pages. And not under the belt, but of my own free will. Who can boast of this among today's youth? This is despite the fact that I go to work and, in addition to her, a lot of household chores ...
        I’m even too lazy to comment on Skomorokhov, although there are flaws in each of his articles ... And you are talking about "hype" smile
        Just my personal opinion...
        1. +6
          2 February 2022 20: 56
          To be honest, knowing you (even if only on the pages of VO), but for quite a long time precisely as a competent, erudite and balanced person, I was surprised by your attack on young people.
          Let's be fair to them, at least in that the rules of "guessing" were imposed on them by the older generation, and not by themselves.
          I will say more, I personally have been playing on computers since the early 90s. Therefore, he protected the child from them and the Boarding School as much as possible.
          What was my surprise when the 5th grade teacher was indignant that she could not demand that my daughter complete her homework, since we do not have the Internet at home.
          I take back my words about the hype.
          Regards, Vlad!
          1. +1
            2 February 2022 22: 45
            Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
            Let's be fair to them, at least in that the rules of "guessing" were imposed on them by the older generation, and not by themselves.

            Let's develop this logical chain. The problem must always be considered from all angles. And try to find the cause, because in most cases all problems are just a consequence of some phenomenon. And personally, I see the source (if you do not look too far) in the collapse of the USSR. With all its shortcomings (which were eliminated if people with broader views on the state of affairs in the economy were in power), the moral foundations of a collective society with an excellent education system (free, by the way) gave a very high percentage of young people interested in their development. Because there were engineers, designers, builders. There was everything, it was simply necessary to expand opportunities within the framework of the social structure of the state. Then a more flexible and adaptable system would survive. An example is China. We looked, adapted and developed under the Communist Party. But we had technologies that they still cannot reproduce. Although skyscrapers are being built...
            As a result, everything began with the collapse of the USSR. You can laugh at conspiracy theories and RenTV as much as you want, but when you read some Western columnists of the middle of the 20th century, your hair moves on the back of your neck ... We blew our kids today for jeans with chewing gum, allowing ourselves to be deceived. So they poke their fingers at the right point, because the winners said that we have a backward education system, although it was advanced .... request
            Because now, with the Soviet education system, I don’t need to ask Google how to wipe myself .... smile smile
            Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
            I take back my words about the hype.

            I accept drinks
            Best regards, hi
        2. 0
          3 February 2022 15: 31
          "every month 2-3 books" now it's not "channel", but for the sake of truth, in our class I liked to read books alone. At the age of 6, he received the nickname: "student" for his interest in books, his cousin (senior) is also a book lover, but he read slowly: 400 pages - he is 3 months old .. Sister, the youngest, does not like books. Interest in books began to decline from the late 70s, and now it is near the baseboard
        3. -1
          8 February 2022 06: 36
          Quote: Rurikovich
          in vain they abandoned the Soviet system of passing exams.

          Of course, in vain ... Now the traffic cops would cry with envy, teachers would carry EVERYTHING strictly according to the calendar.
          Now - when it is directly forbidden to collect money from parents - and even then there are a lot of schools with requisitions. Even with the Unified State Examination, they manage to cheat
          And if there are exams, uuuu ....
          They brought the loot - "The boy tried, although he was silent", they did not bring "yes, he was silent and did not say a word !!".
          We have already seen - how it was in the 90s and 00s at exams at universities.
      2. +7
        2 February 2022 21: 20
        At one time, as a parent, I tried to pass the USE test in history. Not easy enough.

        Vladislav, I can’t say anything about the Unified State Exam in history, but in physics, I can very well. Unfortunately, I cannot print these words, because they are all obscene. They come to me for the first year at the aviation institute with such "knowledge" that I have to go through the school level at the institute again. Of course, there are 3-4 people whom no exam has spoiled, and the rest ...
        1. +6
          2 February 2022 22: 26
          Quote: Aviator_
          I have to go through the school level at the institute again

          At the first lecture on "upper" mathematics in the 1st year, the teacher with the words: "I want to know who I am going to teach," gave a task for the level of 8-11 grades. The greatest difficulties were caused by quadratic equations laughing
          1. +6
            2 February 2022 22: 32
            With physics, it’s a little easier here than with mathematics - in the institute course of physics, the same sections are passed as in school, but with different mathematics, and school mathematics is studied only at school. I usually advise first-year students to purchase a reference book on elementary mathematics by S.Ya. Vygodsky, there is all school mathematics in abundance. I myself use it sometimes, 1969 edition.
            1. +1
              3 February 2022 06: 49
              Quote: Aviator_
              Physics is a little easier than math

              Look here: to find div, rot, grad or even Lagrangian (!) you just need to take derivatives with certain conditions for taking these same derivatives ... And then, oh horror, add them or subtract them, or write them separated by commas.
              But physics is becoming closer to reality... There is no longer a uniform rectilinear or uniformly accelerated... Things appear that were not taken into account before...
              I could be mistaken in terms, I studied all this more than 15 years ago feel
              1. 0
                3 February 2022 08: 51
                But physics is becoming closer to reality... There is no longer a uniform rectilinear or uniformly accelerated... Things appear that were not taken into account before...
                Physics is always only close to reality, it is a natural science. Uniform and rectilinear movements were and remain. Another thing is that for other problems it is necessary to use other approximations. So to speak, the customer requires.
                1. +2
                  6 February 2022 09: 08
                  Quote: Aviator_
                  Physics is always only close to reality

                  Physics is only close to reality, mathematics is a science that was invented, chemistry is a science that invents itself laughing
                  And music ... And music - it is eternal!)
                  1. 0
                    6 February 2022 14: 02
                    And music ... And music - it is eternal!)

                    good
        2. +1
          3 February 2022 15: 05
          “I didn’t spoil the exam,” thank God, before the exam, but if the “garlic” (as some people say) in our class they practically didn’t know mathematics: the teacher didn’t even remember the multiplication tables! It was cool: we will write off and he with "spurs"
  6. -1
    2 February 2022 18: 38
    Something is wrong with your wheel formula. Not 1-5-0, but 1-5-4, because the cabin and the tender are not hanging in the air ..
    1. +13
      2 February 2022 18: 55
      Something is wrong with your wheel formula. Not 1-5-0, but 1-5-4, because the cabin and the tender are not hanging in the air ..
      In the previous article it was said that the tender is not included in the wheel formula (it can generally be uncoupled). And there are no wheels under the cab, (see photo) so everything is correct 1-5-0
    2. +8
      2 February 2022 18: 59
      The tender was not considered for the steam locomotive. At the end, the number of supporting axles was indicated, in this case -0.
    3. +6
      2 February 2022 19: 33
      Quote: Dzafdet
      Not 1-5-0, but 1-5-4, because the cabin and the tender are not hanging in the air

      A tender is a special railway car attached to a steam locomotive, designed to carry a supply of fuel for a locomotive) there are no wheels under the cab, that's why - 0
  7. -5
    2 February 2022 18: 56
    Quote: Aviator_
    Something is wrong with your wheel formula. Not 1-5-0, but 1-5-4, because the cabin and the tender are not hanging in the air ..
    In the previous article it was said that the tender is not included in the wheel formula (it can generally be uncoupled). And there are no wheels under the cab, so everything is correct 1-5-0

    This is not correct, because without a tender I have not seen a single steam locomotive. Although now everything is possible ...
    1. +5
      2 February 2022 21: 23
      This is not correct, because without a tender I have not seen a single steam locomotive.

      Well, now you don't see them anywhere. And in my deep childhood I saw a steam locomotive without a tender at the station and was very surprised.
    2. +4
      2 February 2022 21: 37
      No tender? Tank locomotive. True, they were not mainline, mpnevrovye, they were on separate railways. I saw old footage in Switzerland
      1. +4
        2 February 2022 22: 34
        Probably, it was also shunting - it doesn’t need much fuel.
        1. +2
          2 February 2022 22: 37
          This steam locomotive has water and fuel tanks along the boiler. There are plenty of photos, take a look.
    3. +11
      3 February 2022 00: 16
      You are wrong. There was such a category - tank locomotive. Not because of the armor and weapons, of course. laughing Usually, a small locomotive designed for shunting or for work within the enterprise. So they don't have tenders - both fuel and water are located on the locomotive.
  8. +5
    2 February 2022 18: 57
    Good article, sorry, not enough photos. When I was in the Brest Museum of Steam Locomotives, I saw a trophy locomotive, sorry, I didn’t think to take a picture.
  9. +10
    2 February 2022 19: 02
    The local steam locomotive car repair plant survived in 1941 and was occupied until September 1943. From old stories, the old-timers learned that the Germans from the local district gathered the remaining railway workers from the switchman to the machinist and stokers, not counting the repairmen. Mostly elderly specialists and those who did not go to the front and join the partisans remained. The leaders of all types of brigades were only Germans. Sabotage was severely punished, but because of the value of personnel they were left to "work". Those who distinguished themselves were encouraged with shag and occupation Reichsmarks, which I have kept since childhood. The time was very difficult, not everyone survived ... After the war, my father worked at this plant for 40 years. I remember the 52nd series of "Frau" until the mid-80s, he worked as a shunter at this plant, but already on fuel oil. Now, on the site of a glorious factory, there are ruins, the independence of the pancake ...
  10. +10
    2 February 2022 19: 11


    Here's a better photo.
  11. +3
    2 February 2022 19: 25
    The war makes its own adjustments, so they tried ... it didn’t help.
    Interesting article.
  12. +7
    2 February 2022 19: 27
    Interesting article. The author is well done, he knows how to choose unexpected and interesting topics for articles.
  13. +6
    2 February 2022 19: 47
    Not Borsing, but Borsig; fix the bug.
  14. +9
    2 February 2022 19: 58

    There is one in Belarusian Baranovichi
  15. +6
    2 February 2022 20: 26
    Good savings! Still, the war of the 20th century is primarily logistics, and here the Germans were at their best. The more worthy was the victory.
    1. +2
      2 February 2022 21: 01
      Quote: CTABEP
      Good savings! Still, the war of the 20th century is primarily logistics, and here the Germans were at their best. The more worthy was the victory.

      There were partisans at their height, who, in spite of everything, broke the praises of the German "order". hi
  16. +13
    2 February 2022 20: 56
    There are a lot of TE niks in the Brest Railway Museum. There was even the rarest French one - at that time it seemed to be the only surviving one, but in 2012 it did not survive the scrap metal collection campaign

    Last photo so to speak fool
  17. +3
    2 February 2022 21: 02
    What a great article! I enjoyed it) That is, they massively removed bronze friction bearings and donated heating brass tubes? Hmm ... The efficiency of steam locomotives was already low, and these machines had to eat even more coal. But technological and reliable. "Too much art is not good." the Germans did not actually participate in the very rise of the scientific and technological revolution as a country. Only techno-slaves like von Braun. How much humanity lost from this, we will never know. Maybe they lost everything...
    1. 0
      8 February 2022 07: 04
      Quote: Mikhail3
      How much humanity lost from this, we will never know. Maybe they lost everything...

      It may well be that, thank God, they didn’t take part .. These could have come up with some kind of wunderwaffe - after which nuclear weapons would have been like a gasoline lighter - like a lighter, but candid ..
      1. 0
        8 February 2022 09: 18
        Oh, and we didn’t come up with the wunderwaffe without them?) Well, wow ... The Germans were just the tip of the European spear. Now the FULL texts of the then letters home, propaganda and newspaper articles of those years are being published quietly. Nobody hid that the Great Patriotic War was a campaign of the whole of Europe against Russia. Not even against the USSR.
        So the whole European civilization is against us. All. And all day and night the wunderwaffe is trying to come up with.
        1. 0
          8 February 2022 11: 26
          Quote: Mikhail3
          So the whole European civilization is against us. All. And all day and night the wunderwaffe is trying to come up with.

          I don’t argue, but it was the Germans who could excel. Although they are prone to excessive technical complexity
          1. 0
            8 February 2022 13: 27
            The main inspiration behind the creation of the atomic bomb, Einstein is a Jew.
            The main performer (and the most bloodthirsty type in the project, the generals are resting), Enrico Fermi is an Italian.
            The smartest there is Niels Bohr - a Dane.
            And the most dangerous Germans, yeah ...
            1. 0
              8 February 2022 14: 48
              Yes, I'm not talking about a bomb at all ... I'm talking about the opportunity to create something more powerful / on other principles in the post-war period
              1. 0
                8 February 2022 16: 56
                Well, I myself started with "maybe") In general, the fact is that every step forward is dangerous. Absolutely everyone. Lying in the cradle, the child will not break his forehead) Any major real scientific discovery is dangerous. Very. Any progress forward is at the same time a powerful bomb. Even the treatment of infantile ailments seems to be much more harmless, and look - we have bred like locusts ...
  18. Eug
    +3
    2 February 2022 21: 33
    And how far could he go on one gas station? The distances between the junction stations in Europe and the USSR differ at times ...
    1. +6
      3 February 2022 00: 39
      You know, I didn't find the exact number. But! ... Prior to this type 52, not a single German (and other imported) steam locomotive could travel distances between stations in the occupied territories of the USSR. And this is about 80 km. For coal - they could, the supply of water did not allow. By the way, the Germans also experimented with tenders for these steam locomotives and subsequently began to produce only one type. Maybe partly because of its capacity?
  19. +4
    2 February 2022 23: 39
    Correctly "Kriegslok" .. I don't know if a steam locomotive was called that in Germany, the common name is "Dampflok" which literally means "steam locomotive"
  20. +3
    3 February 2022 00: 23
    Did the "Germans" get into our turning circles?
    1. +3
      3 February 2022 00: 40
      Yes. Turning radius 110 meters. Just like most of our locomotives. Or did you mean rotary, in the depot?
      1. +3
        3 February 2022 01: 03
        Or did you mean rotary, in the depot?

        Yes, namely rotary in the depot.
        I am ready to tell the "case" from the point of view of the "hunter for locomotives."
  21. +3
    3 February 2022 13: 42
    You wrote great. The BR52 was a really reliable worker. And the most important in the GDR. Thank you.
  22. +1
    3 February 2022 14: 40
    Igor, the "leader" did not see your work yesterday.
    And I read about the steam locomotives of the Te series somewhere in a magazine. Like: the Germans needed a steam locomotive, but they could not produce a full-fledged steam locomotive and chose an ersatz project. But they said that no more than 1,500 pieces were produced.
  23. +3
    3 February 2022 14: 44
    Some of the locomotives were equipped with a special wheel mounting design, which made it possible to quickly change the gauge. Well, you understand which country was meant.

    Is it really the USA? wassat
    But seriously, I liked the article. Written in living language. Learned something new for myself.
    Igor, thanks!