Military Review

Borey-A, Avangard, MiG-35S. What the Russian military got in 2021

94
Tank T-90M "Breakthrough", photo: rostec.ru/

In 2021, the process of transferring weapons and military equipment to the Russian army continued.


According to Sergei Shoigu, the combat capabilities of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have grown by 12,8 percent over the year.

In total, the industry supplied more than 5 thousand different types of weapons to the army.

During his speech at the expanded collegium of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the Minister made a special emphasis on the state of the Russian nuclear triad.

As a result of large-scale and purposeful work, the level of equipment of Russia's strategic nuclear forces with modern weapons reached 89,1 percent - the highest level in the entire history their existence.

According to Shoigu, the Russian army is currently the world leader in equipment with modern weapons.

This state of affairs requires the involvement of trained personnel. In 2021, 13 thousand officers were sent to the troops, the staffing of the armed forces was 96 percent. The Minister of Defense also noted that the number of contract soldiers in the Russian army was twice the number of conscripts, 67 percent of them have higher or secondary vocational education.

Strategic nuclear forces received Avangard and new nuclear submarine Borey


The process of modernizing and improving the Russian nuclear triad consists not only in the supply of new weapons, but also in the creation of a modern infrastructure.

At the collegium of the Russian Ministry of Defense, they noted that in 2021, 690 high-tech facilities for the strategic nuclear forces were built in the country.

According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, in 2021, another strategic nuclear submarine of the Borey-A project was accepted into the Russian Navy, the main armament of which is the Bulava intercontinental ballistic missiles.

In turn, the Strategic Missile Forces completed the process of re-equipping the first missile regiment with the new Avangard missile system, equipped with guided hypersonic warheads.

PGRK "Yars" in the suburbs in preparation for the parade on Red Square, photo: Russian Ministry of Defense

Also, in two regiments of the Strategic Missile Forces, the process of placing the first launchers of the Yars missile system on combat duty has been completed. This complex is currently the basis of the country's nuclear missile shield. The complex is available both in soil and in a mine version and replaced the Topol and Topol-M complexes.

The combat readiness of launchers in the Strategic Missile Forces is estimated by the Russian Ministry of Defense at 95 percent.

aviation Russia's strategic nuclear forces in 2021 received four modernized Tu-95MS strategic missile-carrying bombers.

The website of the Ministry of Defense notes that by the end of 2021, Russian long-range aviation aircraft performed 30 flights.

The Navy received a nuclear submarine of the Yasen-M series


At the end of 2021, the Russian Navy was replenished with seven large warships: four surface ships and three submarines.

In addition, the fleet received from the Russian industry 17 ships and support boats, 10 combat boats, and three Bastion coastal missile systems.

Among other things, the Minister of Defense said that state tests of the sea-based Zircon hypersonic cruise missile had been completed in Russia. The start of serial deliveries of missiles is scheduled for 2022.

At the very end of the year, the Russian Navy included two modern nuclear submarines, Knyaz Oleg and Novosibirsk, of the Borey-A and Yasen-M series. These are the most modern Russian underwater projects. fleet.

Also at the expanded collegium of the Ministry of Defense, they noted the early completion of work on the construction of the base minesweeper "Georgy Kurbatov".

Multipurpose nuclear submarine "Kazan" of project 885M "Ash-M", photo: Russian Ministry of Defense

Project 885M Yasen-M nuclear-powered multipurpose submarines are among the most advanced and versatile in the Russian fleet. Their unofficial nickname is "Carrier Assassins."

The boats can be armed with cruise missiles "Caliber" and "Zircon", and also carry torpedo weapons. The Russian fleet already includes three Yasen project boats, and six more submarines are under construction.

Strategic submarines of the 4th generation of the Borey-A project carry 16 Bulava ICBMs on board. The boats of this project are assigned names that are traditional for Russian warships of the 1st rank. So, already commissioned two nuclear submarines of the Borey-A project are named: "Prince Vladimir" and "Prince Oleg".

In total, there are plans to add seven more submarines of project 955A to the fleet, five of which have already been laid.

With three already built boats of the project 955 "Borey", there will be 12 submarines of this series in Russia.

Aerospace forces were replenished with MiG-35S aircraft


According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, 2021 samples of new and modernized aviation equipment were delivered to the country's aerospace forces in 151.

Aviation and anti-aircraft missile regiments were formed as part of the Russian Aerospace Forces. More than 30 models of modern weapons were supplied to the air defense and anti-missile defense forces, including the well-known S-400 Triumph anti-aircraft missile systems, as well as the S-350 Vityaz complex.

The S-350 is a new generation air defense system designed to combat not only aerodynamic, but also ballistic targets. The complex, among other things, received an increased stock of missiles, which is especially important in the context of the possible massive use of modern high-precision weapons by the enemy.

Earlier, the state corporation Rostec reported that the S-350 Vityaz complexes would replace the S-300PS and Buk-M1-2 systems.

Multifunctional light fighter MiG-35S, photo: Russian Ministry of Defense

One of the most interesting updates in the Russian Aerospace Forces was an aviation regiment armed with MiG-31IK aircraft.

This name was given to a modification of a high-altitude supersonic fighter-interceptor armed with the Dagger hypersonic missile system.

The first multipurpose fighters MiG-35S ("C" in the name of the aircraft means "serial") also appeared in the Aerospace Forces.

The MiG-35 is a multipurpose light fighter of the 4 ++ generation, a further development of the famous front-line fighter MiG-29. A number of technologies typical for fifth generation fighters were implemented in the aircraft design.

In particular, the fighter is equipped with a radar with an active phased antenna array, the radar signature of the vehicle has been reduced. The fighter also received engines with increased thrust. An important feature of a combat vehicle for Russia is the preservation of the ability to work from unpaved airfields.

At the same time, the aerodrome network has been improved in recent years. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, over the past seven years, the country has reconstructed runways at 29 airfields.

Reconnaissance and strike drone "Altius-RU", photo: Russian Ministry of Defense

New drones are on the way.

The Russian Defense Minister said that in 2021, the tests of the Altius-RU UAV, a Russian heavy long-range drone, were completed. This drone is able to carry various payloads, not only reconnaissance systems, but also a complex of weapons.

The takeoff weight of the drone is estimated at about six tons, while its payload exceeds a ton.

Ground forces received T-90M "Breakthrough" tanks


Most of the military equipment in 2021 was delivered to the ground forces, they received more than 2 samples of weapons, military and special equipment, both new and modernized, from industry.

The Russian Ministry of Defense noted that in 2021 two new divisions were deployed: motorized rifle and tankas well as missile and anti-aircraft missile brigades.

Among the equipment supplied to the troops there are about 900 tanks and armored combat vehicles and more than 1 units of automobile equipment. Thus, the army received more than 200 modern and modernized main battle tanks, among which the T-240B72M and T-3BVM tanks, which are well known to many, but pulled up to the requirements of today, as well as the new T-80M "Breakthrough".

The T-90M Proryv tanks are the most advanced Russian combat vehicles that meet the challenges of modern combat. They represent a deep modernization of the T-90 tanks and received a completely new turret, which positively affects the survivability of the crew and the comfort of its work. Also, this tank is distinguished by the presence of a more powerful diesel engine (1 hp).

203-mm ACS 2S7M "Malka", photo: Uralvagonzavod

Motorized riflemen in 2021 received from the industry BMP-3, as well as upgraded versions of the BMP-2, equipped with a new fighting compartment "Berezhok".

Due to the use of this combat module, the capabilities of the infantry fighting vehicles already in service were significantly expanded. In addition to a more advanced fire control system, this combat module combines a 30-mm 2A42 automatic cannon, an AG-30 17-mm automatic grenade launcher, a 7,62-mm PKT machine gun and guided missile weapons - 4 Kornet ATGMs.

The process of updating the artillery component of the RF Ground Forces also continued. In addition to the MLRS of the Tornado family, the troops also receive new barreled artillery. In 2021, the Uraltransmash company completed the process of supplying the troops with the modernized 203-mm 2S7M Malka self-propelled guns.

In addition, Uraltransmash supplied the military with a batch of new 2S19M2 Msta-S self-propelled guns. For self-propelled guns of this modernization, the aiming rate of fire was increased to 9 rounds per minute. At the same time, the ACS 2S19M2 was able to conduct a "fire raid" on one target with a series of five shots, after which the ACS can change its firing position.
Author:
94 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Magic archer
    Magic archer 29 December 2021 06: 11
    +9
    This is certainly good, but where are the promised Su-57 ??! Where is Armata? I mean the standard configuration) and no. At parades only if. Even in tank biathlon we still perform on T-90! There is nothing to say about the Navy except for the nuclear submarine. As there were no destroyers (Leader, for example), and no. Boats so then they also need protection. And it as it was not and is not. You can minus. In general, I don’t give a damn. I’m not all-consuming, but except for 72% in strategists there is nothing to boast about. The rest is almost all Soviet legacy ...
    1. URAL72
      URAL72 29 December 2021 07: 17
      +6
      Even in tank biathlon we still perform in T-72

      In my opinion, you got up on the wrong foot today. And what should we perform in biathlon, if most of the countries of the world have equipment that is inferior even to the T-72B3? Who wants to compete with the T-90M or Armata? But the main thing in biathlon is not the level of technology, but the level of training of the crews. You write nonsense. Move your laptop away from the couch! Today we have the best strategic nuclear forces in the world, and they are the guarantee of our security. The US military budget is 12 times larger than ours, and then there are NATO, Japan, Australia and other six of the US, ready to take part in the destruction and robbery of Russia. What Armata? This is for local conflicts, for a big war, only nuclear weapons.
      1. Magic archer
        Magic archer 29 December 2021 07: 58
        -2
        Another "analyteg" God forgive me. Re-read my post. Did I say something about the strategic nuclear forces? Ours can't even show T-34s. Doesn't it seem strange!? Or maybe there are pitfalls and we’re afraid to embarrass ourselves !? I just hinted at KAZ, but our super tanks still don’t even have a panoramic viewer, not to mention more or less normal thermal imager! Come on, tell me more about the power of strategists! Smart guy ... negative
        1. URAL72
          URAL72 29 December 2021 09: 03
          +5
          But our T-90s can't even show

          Judging by your comments, you are still a smart guy. The T-90 was shown at an exhibition in the Emirates back in the 90s, with a run, shooting. All targets were hit. NATO members refused to shoot, saying that the result in this case would depend on the crews. The T-90 was tested in India, Algeria and Malaysia. What and who else needs to be shown? And you really didn’t ask about strategic nuclear forces and tactical nuclear weapons, because you think very stupidly that in order to defend ourselves against NATO, we, as a Union, must and CAN rivet 70 tanks, 000 combat aircraft, etc. I pointed out to you the difference in defense spending - has it really not come to light that we cannot participate in the arms race? Putin understands this, so our military budget is not large, but it is feasible for a peacetime economy.
          1. Magic archer
            Magic archer 29 December 2021 09: 25
            +4
            It's begun ... let's get into politics! What do you have to do with exhibitions!? What are you bringing!? They always offer the best to exhibitions and parades! And I just asked why we ride the good old T-72s at the banal biathlon !!! I'll tell you a little secret. We have been in the arms race for a long time. I hope there will be no limit to your surprise. With such analytics as yours, we must use nuclear weapons in any conflict. In response, they said everything in a row that there was not even any desire to enter into a dispute with you. I especially smiled about the number of tanks and aircraft. I’ll reveal another secret. Just NEW equipment will replace the number. One plane with Afar will replace three with a conventional antenna. And we cannot even modernize normally. But the yachts of the oligarchs-sidekicks you know who are the biggest in the world. So we live, right !? fool
            1. Denis812
              Denis812 29 December 2021 13: 05
              +16
              So your opponent is generally right. Nuclear weapons have a priority, since only it can at the present time guarantee our independence at least somehow.
              The rest is on a leftover basis.
              To my great regret, this is exactly the case. Because the budget is not rubber. And now it is simply pointless to try to surpass NATO in conventional armaments.
              in any conflict we must use nuclear weapons
              Almost yes. In any direct military confrontation with the United States or China, we will have to use nuclear weapons.
              If any Ukraine climbs, then you can do without nuclear weapons
              1. Ingvar 72
                Ingvar 72 29 December 2021 13: 39
                +1
                Quote: Denis812
                Because the budget is not rubber.

                Money from the state at least chew the booty, excuse the expression.
                Recently, Putin raised the threshold for accumulating the NWF from 7 to 10%, which means that foreign exchange earnings from the sale of resources will continue to be invested in the securities of foreign countries, not our economy.
                And at the same time, they also reduced spending on social needs and health care.
                And this is only if you do not remember the most expensive sporting events. wink
                So it's not about the budget. hi
                1. Flooding
                  Flooding 29 December 2021 14: 18
                  +12
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  Recently, Putin raised the threshold for accumulating the NWF from 7 to 10%, which means that foreign exchange earnings from the sale of resources will continue to be invested in the securities of foreign countries, not our economy.

                  REVERSE
                  an increase to 10% of GDP means that it is possible to invest funds (including in foreign securities) only if this limit of savings is exceeded

                  “According to the current Budget Code (BC), until the NWF reaches 7% of GDP, the fund's funds can only be placed on deposits and bank accounts with the Bank of Russia. Only those funds that go to the NWF in excess of this threshold can be invested in other financial assets. "

                  do not mislead citizens!
                  and this is not a defense of the current government
                  and the fight against untruth
                  1. Ingvar 72
                    Ingvar 72 29 December 2021 14: 26
                    -10
                    Quote: Flood
                    an increase to 10% of GDP means that it is possible to invest funds (including in foreign securities) only if this limit of savings is exceeded

                    Do not own the topic at all.
                    NWF funds cannot be used for investment in the country's economy.
                    For the sake of interest, read the recommendations of the IMF on this matter, and compare with the decision of Putin.
                    The order was understood and executed.
                    “The authorities are advised to refrain from quasi-budgetary transactions with the funds of the National Wealth Fund, and should continue to invest them in high-quality foreign assets (even after reaching the liquid part of the fund 7% of GDP) in order to save resources for future generations and avoid procyclicality,” concluded the IMF experts ...
                    1. sleeve
                      sleeve 29 December 2021 14: 32
                      +4
                      Read, read)
                    2. Flooding
                      Flooding 29 December 2021 14: 33
                      +5
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      Do not own the topic at all.

                      where am I to your level of information

                      About investments and 10%

                      "The State Duma passed a law providing for an increase from 7% to 10% of GDP in the volume of liquid assets of the National Welfare Fund (NWF), above which they can be invested in various assets."

                      more details at https://ria.ru/20211117/gosduma-1759438081.html

                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      NWF funds cannot be used for investment in the country's economy.


                      About the use of NWF funds:

                      "Budget Code of the Russian Federation

                      Article 96.10.
                      National Welfare Fund

                      1. The National Welfare Fund is a part of the federal budget funds subject to separate accounting and management in order to ensure co-financing of voluntary pension savings of citizens of the Russian Federation, as well as to ensure the balance (deficit coverage) of the federal budget and the budget of the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation. "


                      So where did you get that
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      Recently, Putin raised the threshold for accumulating the NWF from 7 to 10%, which means that foreign exchange earnings from the sale of resources will continue to be invested in the securities of foreign countries, not our economy.


                      this is not an increase in the volume of NWF savings!
                      this is the so-called restrictive threshold for investments from the NWF!
                      means that while the funds are below 10% of the RF GDP, they cannot be invested!
                      1. Ingvar 72
                        Ingvar 72 29 December 2021 14: 43
                        -3
                        Quote: Flood
                        that while the funds are below 10% of the RF GDP, they cannot be invested!

                        So that's what we're talking about. We cannot use this money, and now we cannot use it until it reaches 10% of GDP, and not 7% ​​as before. This is what the IMF recommends, and this is what Putin signed.
                      2. Flooding
                        Flooding 29 December 2021 14: 44
                        +3
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        So that's what we're talking about. We cannot use this money, and now we cannot use it until reaching 10% of GDP, and not 7% ​​as before

                        this just means that the funds cannot be used to purchase those very foreign assets.
                        but can be used for its intended purpose (read the Budget Code)

                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        This is what the IMF recommends, and this is what Putin signed.

                        what a wonderful IMF!
                        he advises to invest less in foreign securities?
                        and increase the stabilization financial cushion?
                        so it is quite in the interests of Russia

                        where did you read about the "IMF advice"?
                        link please
                      3. Ingvar 72
                        Ingvar 72 29 December 2021 15: 17
                        -6
                        Quote: Flood
                        and increase the stabilization financial cushion?

                        You perfectly understand what it is about. But diligently portray an eccentric. This money cannot be used to invest in the Russian economy, and cannot be spent in the formation of the budget. Currency that cannot be used and is losing value due to inflation.
                        https://kommersant-ru.turbopages.org/kommersant.ru/s/doc/3981645
                      4. Flooding
                        Flooding 29 December 2021 15: 23
                        +6
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        You perfectly understand what it is about. But diligently portray an eccentric

                        You perfectly understand that your words about the IMF's advice are fiction. But you're trying to put a good face on a bad game.

                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        This money cannot be used to invest in the Russian economy.

                        it was absolutely not about that.
                        the main task of the NWF is to support the pension fund and the state. budget.

                        but it was about your lies
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Recently, Putin raised the threshold for accumulating the NWF from 7 to 10%, which means that foreign exchange earnings from the sale of resources will continue to be invested in securities of foreign countries, not our economy.


                        these 10% instead of 7% does not mean the growth of the NWF funds and the diversion of budget funds from the real economy
                        I already wrote about this above

                        Quote: Flood
                        while the funds are below 10% of the RF GDP, they cannot be invested!
                      5. Ingvar 72
                        Ingvar 72 29 December 2021 15: 29
                        -4
                        Quote: Flood
                        You perfectly understand that your words about the IMF advice are fiction

                        Is the IMF recommendation an invention? belay
                        You are out of your mind - information beats according to official sources! fool

                        Quote: Flood
                        it was absolutely not about that.

                        Yes, it was about the fact that the state has money at least ...... chew a full refrigerator, but for some reason it makes key industries go hungry.
                      6. Flooding
                        Flooding 29 December 2021 16: 23
                        +3
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Is the IMF recommendation an invention?

                        don't break
                        fiction what you wrote about the IMF advice

                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        We cannot use this money, and now we cannot use it until it reaches 10% of GDP, and not 7% ​​as before. This is what the IMF recommends, and this is what Putin signed.


                        this is your invention
                        I asked to provide confirmation of your words, a link to this information
                        you ignored my request
                      7. Ingvar 72
                        Ingvar 72 29 December 2021 16: 29
                        -4
                        Quote: Flood

                        don't break

                        You don’t confuse me? wink
                        Quote: Flood
                        this is your invention

                        Is this fiction?
                        The authorities are advised to refrain from quasi-budgetary transactions with the funds of the National Wealth Fund, and should continue to invest them in high-quality foreign assets (even after the liquid part of the fund reaches 7% of GDP) in order to save resources for future generations and avoid procyclicality, ”the IMF experts concluded.
                      8. Flooding
                        Flooding 29 December 2021 16: 37
                        +3
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Is this fiction?

                        yes you do not understand what is written

                        The IMF recommended the Russian Ministry of Finance to invest funds from the NWF “in high-quality foreign assets,” that is, mainly in Western government securities. This is necessary "in order to save resources for future generations," according to the fund.

                        The International Monetary Fund (IMF) recommended that the Russian Ministry of Finance continue to invest the funds of the National Wealth Fund (NWF) “in high-quality foreign assets” even after the fund reaches 7% of GDP. By "high-quality foreign assets" the IMF understands government bonds of Western countries (France, Germany, USA, etc.) with a high credit rating.


                        Read more at RBC:
                        https://www.rbc.ru/economics/24/05/2019/5ce813dd9a7947a54edb46ea

                        it means that
                        The IMF, worried about the introduced threshold of 2019% of GDP for the NWF in 7, expressed hope that Russia would continue to invest in foreign assets.

                        What can we say about 10% !!!


                        And it was you who accused me of lying and manipulation the other day, without providing any confirmation of your words ?!
                        Be ashamed!
                      9. Ingvar 72
                        Ingvar 72 29 December 2021 17: 03
                        -3
                        Quote: Flood
                        And it was you who accused me of lying and manipulation the other day, without providing any confirmation of your words ?!
                        Be ashamed!

                        Do you know what the people who twist everything are called? wink
                        This is not a hope, but a recommendation. And Putin raised this threshold in accordance with them.
                        Read carefully what you yourself refer to. laughing
                        And then your arguments give off a stratification of the psyche.
                      10. Flooding
                        Flooding 29 December 2021 17: 52
                        +3
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Read carefully what you yourself refer to.

                        do not play
                        the point is that this is a link to the text you quoted.
                        you are too lazy to attach the link.

                        Once again, let's go through the material with a careless student

                        "Now the NWF receives super profits from the sale of oil: according to the budgetary rule, revenues in 2019 when the price of Urals oil is higher than $ 41,6 per barrel. Now the NWF has 3,8 trillion rubles, or 3,6% of GDP. According to the Budget Code, after the liquid part (excluding the investments already made) of the NWF reaches 7% of GDP, the fund's funds can be spent. The Ministry of Finance predicts that this will happen by the end of 2019, when 7,9 trillion rubles will accumulate in the NWF. "

                        the NWF received profits from the sale of oil in excess of $ 41,6 per barrel.
                        that is, the absolute amount of funds on the NWF is not limited.
                        but they first introduced a limit of 7%, and then 10% of GDP, as a threshold to which it is impossible to spend funds from the NWF.
                        7% were introduced in 2019.
                        which was followed by the reaction of the IMF, which expressed the hope that after reaching this restrictive 7%, the funds of the NWF will go to the purchase of foreign assets as it was before.

                        "The IMF is interested in us keeping our NWF in foreign reserves," commented the first deputy chairman of the government, finance minister Anton Siluanov. But the government, he warned, will invest in the economy - new projects and new infrastructure are needed. "

                        more details at https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2019/05/26/802472-mvf-fnb

                        Again:
                        Where is the confirmation of your words that the Navy recommended raising the threshold to 10%?


                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        We cannot use this money, and now we cannot use it until it reaches 10% of GDP, and not 7% ​​as before. This is what the IMF recommends, and this is what Putin signed.


                        I'm asking for the third time
                        learn to be responsible for your words
                      11. Ingvar 72
                        Ingvar 72 29 December 2021 20: 12
                        -5
                        Quote: Flood
                        According to the Budget Code, after the liquid part (excluding the investments already made) of the NWF reaches 7% of GDP, the funds of the fund can be spent.

                        Only those funds, the amount of which exceeds this 7%.
                        And not the funds of the NWF.
                        And I gave you the links, take the trouble to carefully re-read my posts.
                        Quote: Flood
                        Did the Navy recommend raising the threshold to 10%?

                        What are you weird? I understand this is such a thick trolling?
                      12. Flooding
                        Flooding 29 December 2021 20: 21
                        +4
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        And I gave you the links, take the trouble to carefully re-read my posts.

                        you didn’t give any links except
                        https://kommersant-ru.turbopages.org/kommersant.ru/s/doc/3981645

                        but this article does not explain what you said that the IMF recommended setting the investment threshold at 7 or 10%

                        Are your comments geared towards boobies?
                        re-read the thread of our correspondence

                        you have escaped the answer again
                        it shows you from the worst side as an opponent
                        but I won't let you write lies anyway
                      13. Ingvar 72
                        Ingvar 72 29 December 2021 21: 20
                        -7
                        Quote: Flood
                        but I won't let you write lies anyway

                        The permit has not grown! wink
                        Your manner of conducting a dialogue reminded me of one teaching, of one exceptional nation - "Demand answers, and after receiving them, repeat:" This is not so, this is not entirely so! "
                        Can you guess the source?
                        PS I don’t know what level of intelligence your followers should have, but if the IMF recommends to keep saving money when it exceeds 7% of GDP, then setting the 10% target is nothing more than the legalization of these recommendations by the colonial government.
                        I will not answer your nonsense anymore, because it is futile.
                2. Escobar
                  Escobar 29 December 2021 17: 51
                  +5
                  Maybe reduce the administrative costs? To transplant governors and mayors from Land Cruisers to, at least duster, Difference to the treasury, instead of regular levies / taxes / excise taxes. For the same purpose, to cut staff or sell off service apartments. Asking the managers of state-owned companies about their business, they did not meet the plan, and you won’t get a bonus.
                3. SSR
                  SSR 31 December 2021 17: 35
                  +1
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  and this means that foreign exchange earnings from the sale of resources will continue to be invested in securities of foreign states, not our economy.

                  I beg your pardon, but on December 9, 44 billion was allocated from the development fund for PD-35, what was that in your opinion?
                  It turns out that they still stand out in the economy.
                  When the Crimean bridge was being built in our country, a bridge across the Volga was built, and this was the second most important project.
                  The truth about him was not trumpeted from all screens.
                  I can throw a lot of stones in the direction of the Ministry of Industry and Trade and others, moreover, many need to be driven with a broom there, but IMHA should be criticized in essence and not in general phrases.
                  1. Ingvar 72
                    Ingvar 72 31 December 2021 17: 45
                    -4
                    Quote: SSR
                    I beg your pardon, but on December 9, 44 billion was allocated from the development fund for PD-35, what was that in your opinion?

                    From the funds of the NWF? Can you link that the source of funding was exactly the NWF?
                    The funds of the NWF could be spent if the NWF exceeded the threshold of 7% of GDP, and then only in an amount that exceeds this 7%. Now 10%.
              2. Aag
                Aag 29 December 2021 15: 52
                +6
                Quote: Denis812
                So your opponent is generally right. Nuclear weapons have a priority, since only it can at the present time guarantee our independence at least somehow.
                The rest is on a leftover basis.
                To my great regret, this is exactly the case. Because the budget is not rubber. And now it is simply pointless to try to surpass NATO in conventional armaments.
                in any conflict we must use nuclear weapons
                Almost yes. In any direct military confrontation with the United States or China, we will have to use nuclear weapons.
                If any Ukraine climbs, then you can do without nuclear weapons

                Sorry, I'm afraid to spoil the holiday mood ...
                About the "non-rubber budget" the other day it was on "VO": In 2021, the Accounts Chamber registered an illegal export of capital in an amount twice the annual budget of the Moscow Region ...
                At the last hope, -SYAS. Apparently (discarding frankly bravura statements), from the triad, only the Strategic Missile Forces remained real ... can be shown in Syria, but, - no more / no offense to all serving in this field, - it's not their fault /) hi .
                Well, now, to the Strategic Missile Forces ...
                I still believe that this is the main deterrent force. That's just a shame, -level, IMHO. falls (the level of education, professionalism l / s is decreasing, the technology is fresh (but I will not say that it is more reliable ... - okay, I am silent about the technology ...)
                ... Damn, it's scary to think - already 21 years in stock (!).
                But, unfortunately, instead of us came not those who are better than us, but those who were "found" ...
                You can remember "Fathers and Sons", senile grumbling, ... But! ...
                The division headquarters is visible from my window. Already the children of my colleagues are retiring on a military pension (by the way, - quite different from us (!). - "modern" senior ensign, with the same length of service as me, a major, receives a pension 1.5 times more.) I, like as well as not much against. But! During the years of service such pensioners have not mastered a lot of "basics". (I am in terms of operating equipment). ... The level of training falls catastrophically ...
                One hope is that this process is moving faster with the adversary ...
                Happy citizens! hi drinks
            2. Revival
              Revival 29 December 2021 15: 59
              +8
              I will try to translate the idea of ​​your opponent, as I understood it, and I think the need for a dispute will disappear, since you will receive an answer to your question.

              Yes, we are completely outright flying out for all conventional weapons and in the event of a war without nuclear weapons we inevitably suffer complete defeat and we cannot do anything about it (this is a breakthrough, apparently, although it may be a jerk), stretch your legs over your clothes.
              So the only thing that keeps us from a cruel inevitable defeat is the threat that we totally use nuclear weapons in the hope that they will die too.
              Not superpower?
              Well, so we are not ...
              1. alexeiilyichev
                alexeiilyichev 30 December 2021 09: 12
                +2
                To be honest, with our copied elite, whose children, grandchildren, capital, and real estate are located abroad, one should not expect the use of nuclear weapons. Even if this happens, until at least the top will hide in comfortable shelters (here the "most important" has already been registered there on a permanent basis) and will live for some time and we will "go to heaven." Therefore, the presence of nuclear weapons in a country without ideology, without a truly people's government, which puts the interests of the people and the country above their own and, in fact, without any political will, that we have nuclear weapons that we do not. To my deep regret.
            3. YOUR
              YOUR 30 December 2021 13: 38
              -1
              No background, just a question -
              In total, the industry supplied more than 5 thousand different types of weapons to the army.

              Does this figure also include AK-12s?
          2. Lt. Air Force stock
            Lt. Air Force stock 29 December 2021 13: 14
            +6
            Quote: URAL72
            Judging by your comments, you are still a smart guy. The T-90 was shown at an exhibition in the Emirates back in the 90s, with a run, shooting. All targets were hit. NATO members refused to shoot, saying that the result in this case would depend on the crews. The T-90 was tested in India, Algeria and Malaysia. What and who else needs to be shown? And you really didn’t ask about strategic nuclear forces and tactical nuclear weapons, because you think very stupidly that in order to defend ourselves against NATO, we, as a Union, must and CAN rivet 70 tanks, 000 combat aircraft, etc. I pointed out to you the difference in defense spending - has it really not come to light that we cannot participate in the arms race? Putin understands this, so our military budget is not large, but it is feasible for a peacetime economy.

            I'm more interested in where the T-15, Kurganets-25 and the Boomerang armored personnel carrier are, that is, what is it that protects ordinary soldiers with their armor directly?
            It seems to me that the reason is not a lack of money or the complexity of fine-tuning, but the fact that the motorized riflemen do not have their own commander, the tank forces have one, the rocket and artillery ones also have, like the air defense forces of the ground forces. And motorized riflemen do not, that is, there is no person who would knock out money and rush the developers of BMP and armored personnel carriers. I was happy for rearmament. The commander-in-chief of the ground forces controls all the ground forces, but there is no direct commander.
            1. Sergej1972
              Sergej1972 29 December 2021 23: 45
              0
              The tank forces do not have a commander either.
              1. Lt. Air Force stock
                Lt. Air Force stock 30 December 2021 12: 56
                0
                Quote: Sergej1972
                The tank forces do not have a commander either.

                Yes, Major General Sergei Bibik. Head of the Main Armored Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.
                1. Sergej1972
                  Sergej1972 30 December 2021 16: 24
                  -1
                  This is not it. Tank regiments and brigades are not subordinate to this department. In general, no combat units are subordinate to him. Go to the MO website and see its functionality.
                  1. Lt. Air Force stock
                    Lt. Air Force stock 30 December 2021 17: 12
                    0
                    Quote: Sergej1972
                    This is not it. Tank regiments and brigades are not subordinate to this department. In general, no combat units are subordinate to him. Go to the MO website and see its functionality.

                    In fact, this man is engaged in armored topics in the ground forces. But for some reason, either tankers or artillerymen always become the chiefs of the main armored directorate, naturally, first of all, they will lobby for equipment in their native troops.
        2. fiberboard
          fiberboard 29 December 2021 17: 54
          +1
          And what is this, I want to ask, did the Chinese show a stunning result on their new technique?
        3. V means B
          V means B 3 January 2022 11: 07
          0
          Ay well done, beautifully you them good
    2. Vissarion Golubov
      Vissarion Golubov 29 December 2021 12: 06
      +3
      In Korea, the Amers met the Mig-15, in Vietnam against the F-4, Skyhawks, Mig-21. Who will meet the F-22 and F-35?
    3. Barberry25
      Barberry25 29 December 2021 12: 11
      -6
      and today is the first of January? only the 29th, 2 more days ahead)
    4. And Us Rat
      And Us Rat 29 December 2021 19: 37
      -1
      According to Shoigu, the Russian army is currently the world leader in equipment with modern weapons.

      This is a very sly assessment, in the absence of a single standard for the "modernity" of weapons.
      What is the T-72B3M? Modern, or is it still old, which has been a little tricked?
      Has the general equipping of infantry units with night vision devices and collimators already been completed?
      And if the natives of Polynesia have the most modern bow and arrow available, can they say that their equipment is more modern than that of a neighboring tribe armed with muzzle-loading guns? what
  2. Prapor-527
    Prapor-527 29 December 2021 06: 15
    +6
    I would like to learn more about the MIG-35. Have you really decided to buy?
    1. Magic archer
      Magic archer 29 December 2021 08: 09
      +1
      So Chess is only a mock-up. When it’s finished, it’s not known. But we don’t have a light fighter except the MiG-29 (35). Therefore, we will again buy one-off. There is nothing serially.
      1. EvilLion
        EvilLion 29 December 2021 08: 45
        -7
        Su-30 and Su-35 are expensive for what, with the Su-57, and the MiG-35 is cheap, yeah, of course.
        1. Magic archer
          Magic archer 29 December 2021 09: 17
          +8
          And why is it cheap !? Google the price of AFAR. The price of the 35th will be at the level of ate no higher than the Su-30 hi
          1. OgnennyiKotik
            OgnennyiKotik 29 December 2021 09: 40
            +7
            It is precisely that the MiG-35 is not cheap, and besides, it is not "lightweight". He, for example, is heavier than Rafal and falls slightly short of the F-15C.
            In general, the MiG-29/35 line is inferior to the Su-27/30/35 in everything. I am generally silent about combat use.
            Therefore, they do not buy them.
            1. Magic archer
              Magic archer 29 December 2021 10: 00
              +1
              Yes, in the know. We were unable to create an engine for a light aircraft at the time. But we already have something. I hope Chess will work out ...
              1. OgnennyiKotik
                OgnennyiKotik 29 December 2021 10: 32
                +2
                Quote: Magic Archer
                . We could not create an engine for a light aircraft at the time.

                In fact, we have these engines and were in the USSR. Curious about what the J-10 and JF-17 fly on.
                It's just that the military made a mistake in their order. The prospects were not assessed correctly. By stupidity or betrayal, this is the second question.
                1. Magic archer
                  Magic archer 29 December 2021 10: 50
                  +7
                  There is some truth in your words, but ours never created an engine similar to the one on the F-16, plus ours suffered from a small resource. As a result, the MiG-29 on two RD was inferior in payload to both the Mipage and the F-16 hi
                  1. Barberry25
                    Barberry25 29 December 2021 12: 16
                    -3
                    do not confuse mig-29 and mig-35
            2. Barberry25
              Barberry25 29 December 2021 12: 15
              -1
              Nobody knows the exact price of the mig-35, the export price was announced at 40 million, the Su-30cm goes for the Aerospace Forces for 50 million, it can be assumed that a moment will go in the price range of 30-40 million apiece, but another thing is important here - the cost of its operation much lower than that of Drying, i.e. it can be used for low-intensity combat operations or patrol sorties for "detection and escort." aerial bombs maybe a moment
              1. Magic archer
                Magic archer 29 December 2021 12: 28
                +2
                If the complete set, with afar, it is more expensive than Sushka. Somewhere I read about the prices. For export there is a slightly curtailed modification. It is cheaper
                1. Barberry25
                  Barberry25 29 December 2021 12: 33
                  +1
                  we will wait and see, in any case, the information will pop up in the end, but taking into account the cost of operation, the country needs to have 100-120 mig-35
            3. bayard
              bayard 29 December 2021 14: 19
              +7
              Quote: OgnennyiKotik
              In general, the MiG-29/35 line is inferior to the Su-27/30/35 in everything. I am generally silent about combat use.

              Let's take a closer look?
              No, not on the MiG-29, on the MiG-35S.
              And certainly with AFAR radar.
              Yes, its price is about the same as that of the Su-30, but ... The Su-30 is 4+, it has the Bars PFAR, it has a range of 3500 km. and lifts a maximum of 8 kg.
              And what will the MiG-35 offer us?
              Firstly, its range is only slightly less than that of the Su-30 - 3000 km (versus 3500).
              Secondly, the payload is also not very different --- 6500 kg (versus 8000 kg). And if we look at the NORMAL load (50% of the maximum), then the difference is even less - 3250 kg. against 4000 kg.
              Third - avionics. On the MiG-35S, it is much more perfect, this is the AFAR radar (in terms of range, "Bars is definitely not inferior, but in terms of noise immunity and versatility, it definitely surpasses). Secure communications, OLS, BIUS ...
              Fourthly, the cost of operation. It is much lower, and not only because of lower fuel consumption, but also the cost of the life cycle in general.
              So in the Aerospace Forces, such aircraft will definitely find a place for themselves. At least those regiments that now serve on the MiG-29 should be transplanted to the MiG-35S. And then maybe the Su-75 will take off, what is the KLA not joking with?
              And the Ministry of Defense will buy MiG-35S, and other clients will reach for it. Until then request they are not sure.
            4. EvilLion
              EvilLion 29 December 2021 19: 45
              -1
              At least take a look at the Wiki of weight and do not write nonsense. An ordinary aircraft of the most massive class.
            5. Kasym
              Kasym 29 December 2021 19: 54
              +2
              "Light" - I mean front-line.
              Do you at least understand the difference between a heavy (Su family) and a light fighter ?!
              Last time you could not answer the question: which fighter will turn 360 degrees faster than the MiG-29 (35)? For the frontline, this is very important. Yakovlev also summed up the experience of the Second World War that two parameters are important for a front-line fighter: speed and maneuverability. And what is better than the MiG-29 (35) in this regard?
              For the front line, 4 tons of combat load is enough - that's 16 OFAB-250. For example, the MiG-21 carried a couple of missiles and a couple of AB. And he was considered a formidable enemy.
              I wonder what you know about the combat use of the MiG-29 (35). I saw him at the training ground and have an idea.
              The Rafale is a good car on paper, but just ... a smaller squadron is equipped with an AFAR at the moment. Without PTB, the range is no more than the MiG-35 - the MiG has more fuel in the internal tanks.
              And of course, the MiG-35 is much cheaper to operate than the Su family.
              After the end of the tests, the MiG-35 will be purchased in the amount of at least 100 vehicles. I think 3 regiments.
              By the way, have you ever wondered why Europe does not design and produce heavy fighters? hi
              1. nks
                nks 30 December 2021 23: 34
                0
                Quote: Kasym
                Last time you could not answer the question: which fighter will turn 360 degrees faster than the MiG-29 (35) ?? hi

                Kasym, why should a fighter turn 360 degrees? To stay in the same position and lose time? The standard combat turn is 180 degrees. The Rafal will turn around faster and turn around than the MiG-29 (35). It must be understood that Rafal is a fighter with the highest permissible overloads (in the world)

                Quote: Kasym

                Rafal is a nice car on paper

                Kasym, you are confusing everything again. The paper fighter is the Mig-35, which was released in ridiculous quantities and which flew (even with tests) generally _order_ less than rafali only combat ones (and you can even take only decks from the version with AFAR - the same advantage will be.)
                Rafal surpasses the MiG-35 not only in terms of flight performance, but most importantly as a weapon system, significantly surpassing the MiG-35 in all types of missions. Air defense, AirPolice, AirDominance, Strike air-to-gound / sea, CAS, reconnaissance, air refueling

                Quote: Kasym

                but that's just ... a smaller squadron is equipped with AFAR at the moment.

                In 2018, 80 RBE2 AA AFARs were delivered. Most of them (5 squadrons) are in the Air Force / Navy. All export rafals were supplied only with AFAR - since that time it is> 70 boards. Total at the moment they are in operation> 150
                https://archive.wikiwix.com/cache/index2.php?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.meretmarine.com%2Ffr%2Fcontent%2Fthales-livre-son-200eme-radar-balayage-electronique#federation=archive.wikiwix.com

                Quote: Kasym

                Without PTB, the range is no more than the MiG-35 - the MiG has more fuel in the internal tanks.

                Right. The Mig-29's range on internal fuel is significantly less than that of the Rafal, and the Mig-35 may have caught up with the Rafal. Yes, it has more fuel, but it is heavier and has more voracious engines. And as for the PTB, there are just fewer possible configurations for a moment, in fact, therefore, with the PTB, the Rafal's range is already significantly greater.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Pechkin
    Pechkin 29 December 2021 06: 23
    -2
    In particular, the fighter is equipped with an active phased array radar.
    Which of the two MiG-35S is equipped with such a radar? wassat
    1. tech3030
      tech3030 29 December 2021 07: 29
      +2
      This is a military secret! wink
  5. EvilLion
    EvilLion 29 December 2021 08: 02
    -4
    What is there with the serial MiG-35?
    However, I am more interested in the delivery of the Su-57, the latest news on the network from the Ministry of Defense was on December 21 or 22, no shifts were mentioned. Or did you decide to accept it in January?
  6. mark1
    mark1 29 December 2021 08: 14
    +1
    From the last messages, the S-550 brigade got up on the database (allegedly it had already passed the GI and entered the series) Information from Avia.pro. but the percentage of reliability, against the background of the aggravation of the situation, probably some kind (over 50) is
    1. Jacket in stock
      Jacket in stock 29 December 2021 09: 42
      +2
      AviaPro in this case just covered the news from TASS.
      MOSCOW, December 29. / TASS /. The new S-550 anti-aircraft missile system (SAM) has successfully passed state tests and entered combat duty. This was reported to TASS by a source close to the military department.

      "The S-550 air defense missile system has successfully completed state tests. The first S-550 brigade took up combat duty," he said.

      According to the interlocutor of the agency, this is "an absolutely new mobile strategic missile defense system, which has no analogues, it is capable of striking spacecraft, warheads of intercontinental ballistic missiles, hypersonic targets at altitudes of several tens of thousands of kilometers."

      According to the source, in this way a deeply echeloned air defense-missile defense system is built on the basis of the Pantsir anti-aircraft missile and cannon systems (at low altitudes), long-range air defense systems S-350, S-400, S-500 and up to S-550 in space.

  7. Bez 310
    Bez 310 29 December 2021 08: 56
    +7
    "The website of the Ministry of Defense notes that by the end of 2021, Russian long-range aviation aircraft performed 30 flights."
    Interesting little business ...
    1. OgnennyiKotik
      OgnennyiKotik 29 December 2021 09: 27
      +4
      Quote: Bez 310
      "The website of the Ministry of Defense notes that by the end of 2021, Russian long-range aviation aircraft performed 30 flights."
      Interesting little business ...

      0,2-0,25 sorties per year, according to the number of YES bombers. It turns out that there was news for every flight.
      Hmm ...
      1. Barberry25
        Barberry25 29 December 2021 12: 16
        -2
        we are talking about combat or patrol missions, not about training
        1. Bez 310
          Bez 310 29 December 2021 14: 57
          -1
          Quote: Barberry25
          we are talking about combat or patrol missions

          Have you decided to fix the MO website?
          And what, there were combat missions? Who did you fight with? What are patrol missions? Don't be lost, your answers are very important to me.
          1. Barberry25
            Barberry25 29 December 2021 16: 17
            -5
            And on the website of the Ministry of Defense they are not mistaken?
          2. 76SSSR
            76SSSR 1 January 2022 01: 20
            0
            Quote: Bez 310
            Did you decide

            Happy New Year to you! You have not verified the information. This is what distinguishes us - you believe and are naive, I am prepared for the transfer. I still have my disturbing suitcase under my bed. You couldn't even unsubscribe me - offended and proud navigator ... Do not undermine the authority of the Motherland, check the details of the dash, the enemy is everywhere and does not sleep ...
    2. bayard
      bayard 29 December 2021 14: 25
      +3
      Quote: Bez 310
      30 flights. "
      Interesting little business ...

      Quote: OgnennyiKotik
      It turns out that there was news for every flight.
      Hmm ...

      You do not understand, they are saving the resource. bully
      1. OgnennyiKotik
        OgnennyiKotik 29 December 2021 20: 55
        0
        Quote: bayard

        You do not understand, they are saving the resource.

        This is actually a good reason. There are few bombers left in the DA, and there will be no replacement for them in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, you need to save the maximum amount for the last flight.
        1. bayard
          bayard 29 December 2021 21: 46
          +2
          I just understand this, but the pilots need to maintain their qualifications so that they can be able to do it on the "last flight".
    3. Stepan S
      Stepan S 29 December 2021 16: 38
      +3
      Russia has completed 30 flights. "
      Interesting little business ...

      I also drew attention to this, it seems that someone could have sealed it, or not every plane took off from the ground, or what flights do they count?
    4. 76SSSR
      76SSSR 30 December 2021 15: 28
      0
      Quote: Bez 310
      Interesting little business ...

      I'm used to checking information, at least suspicious. And on the MO website, I did not find such information about 30 flights. But I found on the Ministry of Defense website, in particular, at the Engels airbase: "The Engels long-range aviation formation in 2021 performed more than 200 flight shifts with a total flight time of about 6 thousand hours, including over 4 thousand flight hours spent in difficult meteorological conditions."
  8. faiver
    faiver 29 December 2021 10: 05
    +17
    Of course, I apologize for the offtop, BUT, today exactly 40 years ago, the Soviet fleet accepted the first 941st Shark, which by the way is still in service, happy birthday drinks
    1. V means B
      V means B 3 January 2022 11: 12
      0
      And it would be better 9
  9. Maks1995
    Maks1995 29 December 2021 11: 28
    +10
    It's good though.

    29th number. There are no promised 2x Su 57s, no Ila, no engines.
    disappeared from the media Petrels, Poseidons, Chechen buggies, Alrus and ultra-high-speed helicopters.

    Shoigu bravely reports on his successes, while civilians modestly keep silent about the failures in fulfilling the instructions of the GDP.
    1. Barberry25
      Barberry25 29 December 2021 12: 18
      -8
      Well, you probably, too, if you promise to become a champion in a week, you will become one? This is military equipment, the process of development and adoption for armament and procurement is long. Even the S-500 / S-550 about which everyone here is surprised and groaned, they began to develop in the first half of the XNUMXs.
      1. Revival
        Revival 29 December 2021 16: 12
        +5
        "Well, you probably, too, if you promise to become a champion in a week will become one?"

        No, I wouldn’t do that, I’m not a chatterbox, to talk deliberately nonsense
    2. bk316
      bk316 29 December 2021 13: 01
      -2
      Media Petrels, Poseidons

      And they won't write until they do it.
      Well, the petrel is not at all a fact of what they will do.
    3. bayard
      bayard 29 December 2021 14: 29
      +2
      Quote: Max1995
      29th number. There are no promised 2x Su 57,

      There are actually 4 of them. promised. yes
      But ... they didn't shmog. request
    4. EvilLion
      EvilLion 29 December 2021 19: 47
      0
      I don’t know what they promised you, there is no such thing in office work, there were contracts, for a strict definition. things, but discussing it is obviously not with you.
      1. Maks1995
        Maks1995 29 December 2021 22: 34
        -1
        Still not sitting in court or bookkeeping.
        They often wrote about the failure of contracts and deadlines.
        But what the media, what officials can promise and not fulfill - you are obviously satisfied.

        The boy said, the boy did it - it was not for "tolerated" from the electorate. You can broadcast some noodles to them.
    5. V means B
      V means B 3 January 2022 11: 14
      0
      Chechen buggies are also that wunder waffle in a pentagon, everyone shuddered when they first heard about it)))))
  10. Drugov
    Drugov 29 December 2021 12: 42
    +8
    And where are the jerks, jerks and breakthroughs promised by the "Guarantor"? In fact, the entire list is either the legacy of the "damned commies", or products made on the basis of the Soviet legacy. Cartoons remain cartoons.
  11. Tests
    Tests 29 December 2021 13: 00
    +6
    No, the tribe of political politicians is not pokobelim!
    "Also at the expanded board of the Ministry of Defense, they noted the early completion of work on the construction of the base minesweeper" Georgy Kurbatov. "
    And 2 nuclear submarines that the SMP handed over to the fleet the other day, will they go into combat service when and when? 2 diesel-electric submarines of the Pacific Fleet "Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky" and "Volkhov" How many months did the shame of the submarine forces of the Russian Baltic Fleet close? When did you arrive at the Pacific Fleet? I hope it will still be faster with a nuclear submarine than with diesel engines ...
  12. Diverter
    Diverter 29 December 2021 13: 23
    -1
    In fact, it is very good that despite the small budget (compared to Chinese and mattresses), we are in the process of rearmament.
    It is correct and understandable that, first of all, the Strategic Missile Forces were almost completely re-equipped
    It is correct and understandable that in the second stage, the missile defense / air defense system was almost completely re-equipped.
    It is clear and correct that the MTR was created.
    It is not clear where the main efforts will now be directed? SV, Navy or Air Force?
    I am in favor of the Air Force!) I am sure it will be understandable and correct)
  13. Alex 1970
    Alex 1970 29 December 2021 13: 41
    +4
    How did you think that combat capabilities increased by 12.8%? By what means? Oh, we love to say something and go and check it out, but how it sounds.
  14. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 29 December 2021 14: 23
    +1
    The MiG-35 is a multipurpose light fighter of the 4 ++ generation, a further development of the famous front-line fighter MiG-29. A number of technologies typical for fifth generation fighters were implemented in the aircraft design.

    In particular, the fighter is equipped with a radar with an active phased antenna array,



    Something silence in this area ... the first two MiG35S were without AFAR
  15. noname1117
    noname1117 29 December 2021 14: 37
    +5
    Objectively, the rate of delivery of new equipment is decreasing. The army did not receive the promised Armata, even the initial batch, about the Coalition, Kurgan residents, etc., do not even stutter, how many T-90Ms were supplied there and whether they were of new production is not disclosed ...
    Aviation received some "batches" of new fighters, which hints that in no case did their size reach the squadron (when they built 20 Su-34s in a year - no one was afraid to talk about this) Instead of the promised 4 Su- 57 - obviously 0, instead of 18-21 Orions - the same. While the Air Force, despite loud statements about "modernity", is 80% Soviet, and in order not to fly in 60-year-old rattle cars in the future, it is necessary to build 50-70 aircraft a year now.
    For the first time in many years, the surface fleet received absolutely nothing - neither frigates, nor corvettes, nor MRKs, which were handed over 2-3 pieces a year, nor even the so-disliked PK Project 22160, which were handed over from the first ship annually. Only "Grayvoron", the delivery of which was postponed from 2020 to this January.
    But the nuclear triad has reached an unprecedented level ... Why if the Americans have declared throughout history that their missile defense has no chance in an all-out nuclear war? They only have installations 4 times less than ours.
    In 2023, they are going to lay new Borei 50 billion each, while the surface forces of the Northern Fleet, plus or minus, correspond to the Norwegian, and the Pacific Fleet was not close to the Japanese.
    1. EvilLion
      EvilLion 29 December 2021 19: 54
      0
      The planes can be handed over in January, even if they are ready, there was no news about the transfers.

      Although, if someone uses the word "promised", then the discussion with him must be stopped, because the person is incompetent from the word at all.
  16. Stepan S
    Stepan S 29 December 2021 16: 43
    +2
    I read the comments - a bunch of dissatisfied whiners. Have you ever been satisfied with something? Like women, you whine and whine. Have you managed to do at least something good in your life, something useful and important? Or all the victories on the VO pages?
    1. V means B
      V means B 3 January 2022 11: 38
      0
      Forgive us, sir, we are a dark people, there is no mind to whine and we know how)))) What can we do from universities)))
  17. Escobar
    Escobar 29 December 2021 17: 37
    +1
    Cool, we have leaked all possible dates for the 2011-2020 fleet renewal program. And no one was held responsible for the failure of the plans. https://topwar.ru/99031-programma-korablestroeniya-vmf-rf-ili-ochen-plohoe-predchuvstvie.html
  18. silver_roman
    silver_roman 2 January 2022 08: 07
    0
    Their unofficial nickname is "Carrier Assassins."
    This phrase already prompts Oski.
    It would be interesting to read about the modernization of the runway and about the program for the construction of hangars for airplanes. These are the necessary things.