New projects and plans for the development of NATO's strategic missile defense

24
New projects and plans for the development of NATO's strategic missile defense

Operating principles of the SBIRS satellite constellation. United States Air Force graphics

The NATO countries, led by the United States, continue to build and develop their strategic missile defense system. Its various objects and systems have already been deployed in various regions of the planet, as well as in outer space. In addition, the development of new types of equipment and weapons for various purposes is underway right now, with the help of which the existing missile defense system will be strengthened in the foreseeable and distant future.

Space train


In the existing US and NATO missile defense system, the task of early detection of launching missiles of a potential enemy is assigned to the American SBIRS series spacecraft. This satellite constellation is almost completely formed and is on alert as part of an integrated early warning system. In the near future, the launch of the last devices will take place.



The Command of the Space Force and the leadership of the ABM Agency believe that SBIRS in its current and expected full configuration is fully consistent with its tasks. Satellites are capable of detecting the launch of both "traditional" intercontinental missiles and promising hypersonic complexes. At the same time, the development of the SBIRS system will continue. It is necessary to form the estimated composition of the group; the possibility of creating a new echelon in its composition is also being considered.

New satellites of the NG OPIR (Next Generation Overhead Persistent Infrared) system may become an alternative to the new SBIRS echelon. This project proposes the development of SPRN satellites with the same functions as SBIRS, but with higher performance. The development of such devices has already begun, and in 2025 the Space Force plans to launch a lead satellite into orbit.


Operation of the promising satellite HBTSS. Northrop Grumman Graphics

Taking into account the new threats, the development of the HBTSS (Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor) satellite with advanced functions has begun at the request of the ABM Agency. Northrop Grumman and L3Harris are involved in this program. Not later than 2023, they must complete the design and present experimental satellites of a new type.

According to the terms of reference, the HBTSS satellite will operate in low-earth orbit and detect launches of missiles of different classes. At the same time, the main task is to detect hypersonic warheads with subsequent tracking along the entire trajectory and issuing target designation to missile defense weapons.

The European countries of the Alliance are planning to create their own group of SPRN satellites. Since 2019, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and Finland have been developing their strategic missile defense project TWISTER (Timely Warning and Interception with Space-Based Theater Surveillance). As the name suggests, one of the components of the missile defense system will be reconnaissance satellites. However, the development of such devices began recently, and technical details are still lacking.

Radio engineering component


The Alliance missile defense system includes a significant number of ground-based and sea-based radar stations for various purposes. There are several large missile warning radars in the United States, and stations from the Aegis Ashore complex are deployed in European countries. These systems are complemented by combat ships with the Aegis BMD system, which patrol in different regions.


Stationary missile defense system Aegis Ashore. In the foreground is a radar station. Photo US Naval Institute

In the distant future, the ground-based missile defense component will face a major upgrade. Not so long ago, the ABM Agency launched the development of a new radar DARC (Deep Space Advanced Radar Capability). It is reported that three such stations could be built by the end of the decade. Only one of them will operate in the United States. The other two will be built in the UK and Australia. This location of the radar, combined with high technical characteristics, will ensure effective surveillance of all important directions.

It is reported that the DARC-type radar will be a ground-based complex with an area of ​​approx. 1 sq. Km. Its key elements will be 15-20 large-diameter transmitting and receiving antennas. Thanks to powerful transmitters and high-performance computing systems, DARC will be able to detect and track objects the size of a soccer ball at ranges and heights of up to 36 thousand km.

For several years, the possibility of creating fundamentally new radio-electronic and radio-technical means for use in missile defense has been studied. The LTL (Left to Launch) concept provides for the prevention of missile launch using cyberattacks, electromagnetic weapons, means of electronic warfare, etc.


SM-2 Block IIA rocket launch from the ship. Photo of the ABM Agency

As far as is known, while the LTL ideas are at different stages of development and are far from real implementation in the field of missile defense. Nevertheless, certain means of this kind, such as cyber weapons or electronic warfare, already exist and are actively used in other areas. Curiously, the US Missile Defense Agency has shown limited interest in such technologies, in contrast to the UK Department of Defense.

Means of defeat


NATO missile defense so far relies on the means of destruction of the American design. Thus, the SM-3 and SM-6 interceptor missiles are used as part of the Aegis BMD / Ashore complexes, and GBI products are on duty in the United States. In the medium and long term, promising interceptor missiles are expected to appear, and not only of American production.

Currently, the United States is developing a promising NGI (Next-Generation Interceptor) interceptor. The possibility of deep modernization of the existing GBI missile or the creation of a new product with all the necessary capabilities is being considered. As in the previous project, it is proposed to create a multistage missile with a kinetic intercept combat stage. In the absence of difficulty, the first NGIs will be able to go on alert in 2027-28.


Anti-missile GBI. Photo of the ABM Agency

A few weeks ago, the ABM Agency launched the GPI (Glide Phase Interceptor) program, which aims to develop an anti-missile to intercept hypersonic warheads. Leading developers of rocket systems are involved in the program. In the coming months, they will have to explore the available opportunities and work out preliminary projects. The timing of the completion of the program and the launch of GPI combat duty has not yet been announced.

Its own anti-missile missile will be developed for the European complex TWISTER. The highest requirements are imposed on this project. The ammunition will have to develop a speed of at least 5 M and climb to heights of up to 80-100 km. Its targets will be short- and medium-range ballistic missiles, various cruise missiles and even hypersonic warheads. The TWISTER interceptor will be based on land and sea platforms.

A large number of different organizations and companies from all participating countries are involved in the TWISTER project. While they are doing the necessary research and just getting ready for the design. In this regard, even the approximate dates for the appearance of experimental products, not to mention full-fledged combat duty, remain unknown.

Main trends


In general, NATO pays great attention to the issues of strategic and tactical missile defense. In this area, new projects of various kinds are regularly proposed, and some of them soon come to practical implementation and putting on alert. At the same time, the overall complexity of the missile defense direction affects the progress of work and leads to the formation of a characteristic picture.


Possible appearance of a promising NGI anti-missile. Lockheed Martin Graphics

It is easy to see that of all NATO countries, only the United States has demonstrated real successes in the field of strategic missile defense. Possessing a significant scientific and technical base and broad financial capabilities, they have already created and brought into operation a number of anti-missile systems. Systems for their development are deployed both on their own territory and in allied countries.

Moreover, measures are being taken to further develop missile defense. New projects of ground and space assets are being created, and promising anti-missiles are being developed. At the same time, the development of already mastered directions continues, and at the same time completely new ones are being mastered. Due to this, it is planned to improve the general characteristics of the missile defense system, as well as give it the ability to counter new threats.

Until recently, European countries did not pay due attention to the development of their own missile defense systems and relied only on American participation. Now they have changed their minds and are trying to develop a new missile defense system with broad capabilities that can compete with US products. However, a number of obvious factors prevent the rapid and high-quality creation of such a system.

Thus, it should be expected that in the short and medium term - until the end of this decade - NATO's strategic missile defense will gradually develop, but these processes will do without fundamental changes. The basis of such a missile defense system will remain American forces and assets, incl. in someone else's territory. At the same time, they will gradually increase their characteristics and acquire new opportunities. By the end of the decade, the emergence of their own European systems is possible, but their ability to influence the general situation is still in question.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    22 December 2021 06: 04

    New projects and plans for the development of NATO's strategic missile defense
    ... Difficult, expensive and yet not very reliable.
    However, in this thread, everything is in approximately similar positions.
    1. -3
      22 December 2021 06: 26
      NATO's plans and projects are only one ... Russia ... all this is directed against it ... I'm more worried about the advancement of this structure towards our borders.
      1. -2
        22 December 2021 07: 54
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        moving this structure to our borders.

        This is serious, but Russia is large, has different components of vigorous containment ... they simply cannot block everything.
        Therefore, they do not "fly" because they have not yet invented flying machines, safe.
    2. -5
      22 December 2021 07: 34
      This is the Arms Race -2. We must not lag behind and direct more financial resources to defense. And the economy is already dead, why bother with it. He sold gas, oil, metal - he bought weapons and developed new ones. Otherwise, there will be no sovereignty, Russia cannot be under the thumb of the Anglo-Saxon capitalist.
      1. 0
        22 December 2021 07: 56
        This is not good, but otherwise no better.
        The question is ... how should it be?
        Do you have an answer?
        1. -5
          22 December 2021 08: 14
          Quote: rocket757
          This is not good, but otherwise no better.
          The question is ... how should it be?
          Do you have an answer?

          Of course have! Better a horrible end than endless horror. Until the resource of Soviet missiles with nuclear warheads runs out, you need to bang from all the mines. But another answer is "the bosses know better."
          1. 0
            22 December 2021 08: 25
            In the first option ... not optimistic, in the second ... doubtful.
            Those. the same thing - not good, neither here nor there.
            1. -1
              22 December 2021 12: 13
              Quote: rocket757
              In the first option ... not optimistic, in the second ... doubtful.
              Those. the same thing - not good, neither here nor there.

              Your option?
              1. 0
                22 December 2021 12: 20
                He is studying and preparing for the modernization / replacement of the political system in the country ...
                Along the way, remember that ill-considered, hasty actions to destroy the current system can lead to big problems.
                1. -1
                  22 December 2021 12: 33
                  preparing for the modernization \ replacement of the political system in the country

                  I don’t understand how the change of a tsar for another tsar or boyars for other boyars can affect the system itself? People are one and the same.
                  quick action to destroy the current system

                  The operating system itself is doing quite well.
                  can lead to big problems.
                  Well, during the transfer of power to the new king, all the promises and laws of the previous one are nullified. That is, pensions, benefits, salaries, the ruble exchange rate, the state and size of the army. It's unavoidable. So, the longer the GDP is, the longer the gradually decaying "stability" will be, without shocks.
                  The new king will fulfill the program of the previous king:
                  1. Dumps the failure on the previous one.
                  2. Promises to catch up with Portugal.
                  3. Recognizes that the people are not drawn to reforms.
                  4. Zero the dates.
                  1. -1
                    22 December 2021 12: 52
                    Quote: Civil
                    I don’t understand how the change of a tsar for another tsar or boyars for other boyars can affect the system itself? People are one and the same.

                    Did I write that it is necessary to change the ruling and faces sitting around them?
                    This is a palace coup, no more than him ... not interesting, nothing, in principle, can not change.
                    Quote: Civil
                    The operating system itself is doing quite well.

                    We also need to prepare for this ... if the previous ones, the power "drop" it, someone should raise and HOLD it.
                    Accidental "clowns" will be out of place here.
                    Quote: Civil
                    Well, during the transfer of power to the new king,

                    There is no talk about this ...
                2. -2
                  22 December 2021 16: 42
                  "He is studying and preparing for the modernization / replacement of the political system in the country ..."
                  Shaw, back to socialism ?! belay only now factories for peasants, and land for workers? lol

                  According to the article, hypersound rules good adversaries do not yet know how to cope with it bully
                  1. +1
                    22 December 2021 18: 09
                    Socialism, an interesting system ... just to return exactly what was ... no, no, the party bureaucratic administrative apparatus, in the form that it was, will be able to ditch anything, anyone.
                    However, and the current managers, bureaucrats, at least in what it is better ???
                    It turns out that there is something to take for the BASIS, but without modernization, progress, nothing will work successfully.
                    1. +1
                      23 December 2021 00: 06
                      We have a locksmith, whatever the Kalashnikov assault rifle does at the end, it turns out lol
                      The same, which system we do not introduce at the end of the party bureaucratic management comes out recourse
                      "Without modernization, progress, nothing will work successfully." This is how we live, either reforms or revolutions laughing
                      I don’t know, we only succeed in war, maybe it’s who we will go to war, so that life would improve? Then progress and order in the country will come, and everything is clear and understandable with partners without any tricks. bully
      2. 0
        22 December 2021 13: 50
        To have finances, you need to work on the economy. The Chinese have raised the economy, now they are pouring military budgets such that we never dreamed of. With an open border, many young people and promising specialists simply leave. You need a stable, fast-growing economy and high wage growth for such races.
    3. +1
      22 December 2021 11: 52
      Somewhere I saw these computer cartoons, they were drawn in mine by Reagan.
      1. 0
        22 December 2021 12: 04
        Now it is more and more dynamic, it turns out brighter ...
        Computer shooters are great, there is nothing against it.
  2. 0
    22 December 2021 09: 53
    So far, the United States has only a patriot who gets into the air well ... the Saudis piss with boiling water
    1. 0
      22 December 2021 12: 11
      No, no, PETRIOT against winged, atmospheric ... there is an anti-missile system, an IJIS system with an SM 3 anti-missile, and a THAAD complex.
      Not too many ... they have a different concept, they always plan to preempt and destroy enemy systems even before the missiles are launched.
      So far, nothing, even theoretically, this is not possible.
      1. -2
        22 December 2021 12: 20
        In a word, they really have nothing
        1. -1
          22 December 2021 12: 24
          Neither they, no one can win ... but devastation and other "joys", this option does not inspire anyone.
  3. +1
    22 December 2021 12: 36
    For several years, the possibility of creating fundamentally new radio-electronic and radio-technical means for use in missile defense has been studied. The LTL (Left to Launch) concept provides for the prevention of missile launch using cyberattacks, electromagnetic weapons, electronic warfare, etc.

    I think cyberattacks are a utopia and investing in it is stupid. Protection of modern nuclear weapons from EMI at a certain level should be present, taking into account the prospect of massive use of nuclear weapons itself (including in the conditions of a retaliatory strike), so relying on EMP spending on proportionate defense should be simply hellish due to the small radius of effective action of conventional EMP means they would have to be produced in hundreds, despite the fact that the EMP generator at least a couple of years ago was a rather expensive and time-consuming toy). Electronic warfare means would play an extremely limited role in countering the guidance of warheads to targets, which are mostly stationary, with known coordinates that do not require practically adjustment.
    A really effective missile defense against a massive ICBM launch should be located in space with most of the interceptors. If I am right, then in the medium term we will face the collapse of part of the international treaties on outer space.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. 0
    23 December 2021 11: 11
    Is this the same AEGIS Ashore missile defense system that caused Putin to so violently threaten the West?
  6. 0
    23 December 2021 11: 38
    Quote: rocket757

    New projects and plans for the development of NATO's strategic missile defense
    ... Difficult, expensive and yet not very reliable.
    However, in this thread, everything is in approximately similar positions.

    To carry out an attack and defeat a significant part of objects, depending on the size of the country, several hundred shells are needed. (I call it conditionally) And for protection, it will take an order of magnitude more. Cover, after all, it is necessary from all possible directions. A ruinous undertaking. Brzezinski once said that they would drive the Soviets in the arms race like a racehorse. It's time for them to die.