Forerunners of the "fur seals"

43

Fighters of the UDT team work on the reef during the landing on Saipan in June 1944, photo: www.history.navy.mil

"Navy Seals" is the traditional Russian-language name for the US Navy SEALs. The name of the special forces is an acronym made up of three words: Sea, Air, Land. The acronym fully reveals the essence of the special forces, the soldiers of which must equally effectively perform combat missions in all environments. In this case, the word seals is translated from English as "seals" or "fur seals". The latter option is also entrenched in Russian-language literature.

The special unit began to form only in 1962. It is believed that after the meeting of the Committee of the Chiefs of Staff of the US Army, an analytical note came to the table of US President John F. Kennedy. The note substantiated the creation of a special unit within the American Navy, which would carry out sabotage and counter-guerrilla activities in the territory controlled by the conditional enemy.



The president, who himself had the combat experience of World War II, supported the idea. As the commander of the PT-109 torpedo boat in the Pacific Ocean, Kennedy was well aware of the value of even small units. He believed that a well-trained David was able to defeat Goliath. The idea of ​​creating SEALs was given the green light, and in the same 1962, the formation of the first detachments of "fur seals" began in the United States.

For American fleet this was not the first special unit.

Even during the Second World War, underwater demolition teams UDT (Underwater Demolition Team) appeared in the fleet. The appearance of such detachments was predetermined by the nature of the military operations of the American army and navy.

It was the UDTs that became the forerunners of the SEALs teams.

Prerequisites for creating UDT commands


As in the First World War, the United States was reliably separated from the main battles in the European Theater of Operations by the Atlantic Ocean. At the same time, sooner or later, a country that entered the war on the side of the USSR and Great Britain had to land its troops on the continent.

Forerunners of the "fur seals"
Demoman officer insignia, image: wikimedia.org

At the same time, another front in the Pacific opened for the United States in World War II. It was the Japanese attack on the base of the US Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 that became the formal reason for the US entry into World War II. The theater of operations in the Pacific Ocean involved the use of the fleet and a series of amphibious operations with landing on numerous islands.

American generals and admirals understood that a series of landing operations would be required for a successful war with Hitlerite Germany and its allies in Europe and North Africa, as well as with the Japanese in the Pacific Ocean. At the same time, any amphibious operation should have been preceded by serious preliminary preparation. The Americans very quickly became convinced of this, having suffered significant losses in a number of landings.

In addition, in the pre-war years, American officers conducted a study of the problems and difficulties encountered by the Entente countries during the landing on the Gallipoli Peninsula during the Dardanelles operation during the First World War. This experience was also taken into account when working out the operations that the American fleet was to carry out in the 1940s.

The landing sites had to be carefully scouted, including directly on the ground. It was also necessary to effectively clear the approaches for the amphibious forces, destroying artificial and natural obstacles at the landing sites. The enemy usually fortified the coast in the places of the proposed landing of troops, setting up mines, gouges, and various metal barriers. In turn, numerous coral reefs have become an additional obstacle in the Pacific Ocean.

So, the landing in November 1943 on the Tarawa Atoll at the first stage turned into a disaster for the Americans. For the first time, the American Marines faced serious resistance from well-trained and well-equipped Japanese troops at the time of the landing. The miscalculation of the American command was the coral reefs and the complex system of ebbs and flows in the atoll area.


American Marines killed while landing on Tarawa Atoll, photo: wikimedia.org

US Marine landing craft literally stuck in coral reefs hundreds of meters offshore. Many soldiers were forced to parachute into the water in full combat gear and simply drowned. Many became victims of the murderous fire of machine guns and artillery, which shot grounded landing craft and the paratroopers themselves trying to get to the coast.

The large losses that the American troops suffered during the landing on Tarawa became the last argument for the creation of specialized combat swimmers in the Navy, which could reconnoiter the landing sites and destroy the underwater obstacles that prevent amphibious means and amphibians from approaching the coast.

After the battle for Tarawa Atoll, Rear Admiral Turner ordered the formation of groups of demolition swimmers.

Operations involving the Underwater Demolition Team


Rear Admiral Richmond Kelly Turner, who was considered the chief amphibious weapons specialist in the US Navy, developed a stormy activity after the end of the battles for Tarawa.

Formation of submarine demolition teams began from the composition of the soldiers of the naval construction battalions (Navy Seabees). It turned out that it was these fighters who had the necessary level of qualifications in engineering. At the same time, only those who had experience with explosives were selected.

Already in November 1943, in the Pacific Ocean, about 7 officers and 30 privates were selected from the 150th Naval Construction Regiment, with whom intensive preparatory work was carried out. Great emphasis was placed on physical strength and endurance. The selected fighters ran and swam a lot. In addition, everyone was taught how to handle inflatable boats and other landing craft.

At the disposal of the demolition squads, in addition to explosives, from weapons there were only knives, this was the only weapon that at that time was completely reliable in the water. Of the equipment at the disposal of the UDT fighters were only primitive swimming masks and fins. There was no question of any scuba gear at that time. Often swimmers went out to the operation in only swimming trunks, since the Pacific theater of military operations allowed this.


Monument to a UDT soldier at Bellows Air Force Base, photo: wikimedia.org

The task of the UDT units was to reconnoitre the landing sites. The swimmers were supposed to quietly, without attracting the attention of the enemy, reach the beaches, conducting reconnaissance and drawing up a map of the depths in the landing area. Immediately before the attack, they had to clear the detected enemy minefields, if any, or blow them up, as well as any obstacles interfering with the landing.

In five weeks, two UDT teams were trained, which in January 1944 took part in the landing on the island of Kwajalein.

Thus began the American offensive against the Marshall Islands. The reconnaissance of the area was successful, during a 45-minute swim near the reefs, the team's fighters were able to measure the depths, clarify the location of the coral reefs and identify some enemy firing points, which were then mapped.

By the end of the war, 21 teams of diving demolition were formed.

They took part in organizing the landings of all landings in the Pacific Ocean since the beginning of 1944. The most ambitious operation with their participation was the battle for Okinawa, in which 8 UDT teams with a total of almost 1 people were used.

This operation had its own specifics.

All previous operations were carried out by swimmers in warm tropical waters, while the water around Okinawa was cool enough to exclude the possibility of long dives. In the absence of thermal protective suits, the fighters of such units required not so much courage as endurance to the cold.


Okinawa Beach Reconnaissance Map from UDT Team # 7, photo: wikimedia.org

Especially to practice a possible invasion of Japan, a training center for training swimmers in cold water was formed as part of the UDT. At the same time, the requirements for the physical condition of the fighters were changed. For example, 9% of the composition was expelled from the composition of UDT No. 70, as they did not meet the new training requirements.

Landing in Normandy


For operations in Europe during the Normandy landings, Naval Combat Demolition Units (NCDU) were used. 34 NCDU teams were involved in Operation Overlord. They had to clear 16 passages to the beaches, destroying numerous obstacles with explosive charges: hedgehogs, gouges and massive metal structures called the "Belgian gates".

The teams were to start working at low tide, clearing 15-meter-wide passages for the landing craft to approach the shore. Unfortunately for the Americans, naval artillery fire and strikes aviation did not suppress the German defenses on the coast, so the NCDU fighters had to engage in engineering clearing of the passages under enemy artillery and machine-gun fire.

Additional difficulties were created by the tide, since it was not possible to cope with the work in the low tide phase in all areas. In addition, directly during the landing, American soldiers used numerous German engineering obstacles on the shore as shelters from fire, preventing the NCDU demolitionists from working.


German anti-amphibious installations off the coast of France

By the evening of D-Day, demolition teams from the NCDU teams were able to open 13 of the 16 planned holes in the engineering barriers ashore. At the same time, the units suffered serious losses. On the beach in the Omaha sector, 52% of the demolition men who landed on the beach dropped out, of the 175 people, 31 were killed and 60 were injured.

Following the completion of the Normandy landings, Admiral Turner requisitioned nearly all of the surviving NCDU fighters, redirecting them to the Pacific, where they became part of the formed UDT teams.

After the war, UDT units were seriously downsized, but not eliminated.

The process of improving their preparation and the search for new use cases continued. At the same time, the fighters of the units received equipment for scuba diving at their disposal, which significantly expanded the options for their use.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -29
    17 December 2021 18: 11
    Sorry, but the history of their parts ... how softer it is, oh, don't give a damn about the goofs. And do we need it? The history of the parts of Napoleon, the Kaiser, someone even Hitler is more interesting. Napoleon and Hitler were also created impudently.request And the history of the military units of our implacable enemies, why? ?
    1. +10
      17 December 2021 19: 06
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Sorry, but the history of their parts ... how softer it is, oh, don't give a damn about the goofs. And do we need it? The history of the parts of Napoleon, the Kaiser, someone even Hitler is more interesting. Napoleon and Hitler were also created impudently.request And the history of the military units of our implacable enemies, why? ?

      How to answer this greediness more delicately ... Maybe something from the classics?
      1. +6
        18 December 2021 02: 07
        Quote: Ashes of Klaas
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Sorry, but the history of their parts ... how softer it is, oh, don't give a damn about the goofs. And do we need it? The history of the parts of Napoleon, the Kaiser, someone even Hitler is more interesting. Napoleon and Hitler were also created impudently.request And the history of the military units of our implacable enemies, why? ?

        How to answer this greediness more delicately ... Maybe something from the classics?

        There is another classic: if a person is a stupid person, then this is forever ...
    2. +11
      17 December 2021 20: 00
      Sorry! But history is always interesting ... even parts of our irreconcilable ones? ", no? And on the Elbe it seems like we met in 45?
    3. +19
      17 December 2021 20: 22
      Probably because the enemy needs to be studied, including its history (for example, the root cause of resistance and readiness for self-sacrifice in WWII among Japanese infantrymen and pilots) in order to develop effective countermeasures and prepare their forces. Or do you think that US seals are such garbage that any of our fat babies from the couch will effortlessly multiply a dozen of their swimmers by zero, even without taking an upright position?
      Underestimating the enemy is the first step towards unjustified losses ...
  2. -25
    17 December 2021 18: 14
    Sorry, but the history of their parts ... how softer it is, oh, don't give a damn about the goofs. The history of the parts of Napoleon, the Kaiser, someone even Hitler is more interesting. request
    1. +4
      18 December 2021 16: 12
      Dear Mauritius!
      Isn't the story of the so-called "tunnel rats" interesting? Just imagine how fearless it is to climb into a narrow and dark hole? Yes. These are guys from the US Army, but what makes a difference? Personal courage does not depend from nationality, right?
      So why not learn more about the brave guys from other armies?
      Especially about such specific ones?
      Best regards, Sergei.
  3. +15
    17 December 2021 18: 27
    landing in November 1943 at Tarawa Atoll
    With the Marines at Tarawa The film won the 1944 Oscar for Best Documentary Short and was presented to the United States Marine Corps.
    1. +3
      17 December 2021 19: 26
      Eh, if Demi Moore's grandmother was filming there, then the KMP would have given ALL 19 Oscars ... in all nominations !!!
  4. +3
    17 December 2021 19: 35
    But, to be honest, the Americans, to be honest, the primacy of the invention of scuba gear is somewhat, much more ..., spanked.
    Thanks for the article, Sergey!
    1. +7
      17 December 2021 19: 48
      And where was the apparatus of US Navy Major Christian J. Lambertsen?
      1. +6
        17 December 2021 19: 57
        Just about, and I'm about the same. Lambertsen invented, but Cousteau patented earlier ...
        1. +8
          17 December 2021 20: 21
          Cousteau and Gagnan created an apparatus that was safe, but posed as air bubbles on the surface of the water.
          And Lambertsen's apparatuses worked according to the isolated breathing scheme.
          And he patented his devices twice. In 1940 and 1944!
    2. +7
      17 December 2021 19: 59
      Hello Anton!
      Yes, this man was ahead of them, he invented the lung governed demand valve during the Second World War. Jacques Yves Cousteau - the legend of the underwater world! smile
      1. +2
        17 December 2021 20: 11
        Uncle Kostya, tell me what Cousteau invented, apart from a comfortable mouthpiece and corrugated hoses?
        1. +7
          17 December 2021 20: 27
          I have already written - "lung governed demand", which provides air supply under the pressure that exists at a specific depth at the moment. And here you do not need to observe the decompression mode when leaving the depth, just do not emerge faster than the air bubbles coming out of the lungs.
          The lung machine of our AVM1M, almost an exact copy of Kustovsky.

          1. +5
            17 December 2021 20: 53
            Vlozi I will disappoint you, but the author of this device, Emil Gonyan
            1. +2
              17 December 2021 21: 05
              You can argue as much as you like, because they worked together.
      2. +5
        17 December 2021 20: 22
        Where is Captain Cousteau's partner - engineer Emile Gagnan?
        They created scuba gear together!
        This is exactly their name!
        1. +7
          17 December 2021 20: 35
          Where is Captain Cousteau's partner - engineer Emile Gagnan?

          Here, more precisely, both of them here.))

          It's just not the right article to lecture on the history of scuba gear. For those who are interested, I advise you to watch the first film by Cousteau - "The Blue Continent", and after it in the "World of Silence".
          1. +7
            17 December 2021 20: 40
            It's just that everything and always does not say Cousteau that, Cousteau that ...
            And about Ganyan, silence ...
            He did not go to the "Calypso" in the seas and Okians and did not shoot the well-known "Odyssey of Cousteau"!
            At that time he was already living in Canada, but continued to improve underwater breathing apparatus.
            1. +1
              17 December 2021 21: 07
              I doubt that Cousteau was specially engaged in self-PR, he was too keen on the person.
              1. +6
                17 December 2021 21: 19
                He looked more like an explorer of depths than a person who was keen on designing complex devices ...
                Personally, my opinion!
                And Ganyang devoted his whole life to this.
                1. +4
                  17 December 2021 22: 11
                  I will not argue, because I respect your opinion. hi
            2. +3
              17 December 2021 21: 10
              Bravo, Alexey!
              1. +3
                17 December 2021 21: 28
                Yeah, bravo ... Ganian, poor fellow, worked hard, and the idler Cousteau, rolling on a yacht, only filmed films. laughing
                "Either eight or eighty" - yes?
                1. +4
                  17 December 2021 21: 39
                  Exactly, exactly. It even reminded me .... the preface to The Golden Calf. bully
                  "How do we write together? ...." bully
                2. +2
                  17 December 2021 21: 45
                  You don't have to grimace, uncle. Scuba Cousteau did not invent. Just took advantage of the "sum of technologies"
                  1. +2
                    17 December 2021 22: 10
                    No need to grimace

                    Do not be rude, it does not decorate a person. And, between us, how many underwater watches do you have?
                    1. +3
                      17 December 2021 22: 18
                      Let us measure ourselves by letters? Not much, an hour and a half.
                      1. +2
                        17 December 2021 22: 26
                        Let us measure ourselves by letters

                        "No matter how you feed the wolf, the elephant still has more." wink
                3. +4
                  17 December 2021 23: 36
                  Cousteau was precisely the explorer of the depths!
                  He showed everyone how beautiful and dangerous the underwater world is. Still poorly understood!
                  And perhaps he himself tested the first samples of breathing apparatus.
                  Perhaps he was the "hegerator of ideas" in the creation of "scuba gear", and Ganyang was "a technical brain and hands"!
                  It's like with airplanes - they are proudly named Tu, Il, La, Pe, An. But few people know those who helped the chief designers create these wonderful cars!
                  1. 0
                    18 December 2021 09: 18
                    Tu, Il, La, Pe, An. But few people know those who helped the chief designers create these wonderful cars!

                    +
                    If you understand, then often the chief designer was like a diploma supervisor, he said what to draw, and checked mistakes, in general, he figured out what to do specifically, and did only the most difficult parts. In fact, each plane is half the brainchild of the chief designer and the entire bureau, they are equally valuable parts. As with the American ar15, which Stoner generally did not do, but he came up with ar10 and chose the cartridge, and without these actions ar15 would not exist.
            3. Aag
              +1
              20 December 2021 15: 03
              Quote: hohol95
              It's just that everything and always does not say Cousteau that, Cousteau that ...
              And about Ganyan, silence ...
              He did not go to the "Calypso" in the seas and Okians and did not shoot the well-known "Odyssey of Cousteau"!
              At that time he was already living in Canada, but continued to improve underwater breathing apparatus.

              ... I remembered: "And Ilyich's light bulb was not invented by Ilyich, but by some kind of Edisson (Yablochkov)!"))) (C) / G. Khazanov, based on folk jokes /

              Apparently, with Smith Wesson, Colt, and even with G. Ford, the situevina was similar (I can be mistaken - the specialists will correct it, I hope).
              hi
          2. +2
            17 December 2021 23: 37
            With Cousteau, not everything is clear, in any case to me. War, Germans, he is a military officer, either on vacation, or a deserter, or something ...
      3. +2
        18 December 2021 02: 14
        Almost off topic ... Once upon a time there was an awesomely illustrated book: "Cousteau's Journey with Wild Whales." Coated paper, excellent photos.
      4. -3
        18 December 2021 07: 59
        Cousteau was in the service of the imperialists, under the guise of science carried out espionage missions and therefore was well equipped and received a lot of money ...
    3. +3
      18 December 2021 01: 22
      Americans, to be honest, the primacy of the invention of scuba gear is somewhat, more ..., spanked
      Yeah ! In the Italian 10th flotilla MAC, Count Borghese was completely better equipped with special equipment! And the combat swimmers from the "Gamma" group (this flotilla) had rubber suits and breathing apparatus ...!
      And here, like the great country of the United States, in fact, only flippers and a mask were added to the outfit of Chingachguk-Big Snake (200 years ago)! And when they began to freeze ... they simply expelled the frozen people! wassat Mdaaaaa ...
      1. 0
        18 December 2021 14: 51
        The Italians had "oxygen equipment", and the staff members had a much wider assortment, the same with the GK - the time is different and it is just as ridiculous to compare the equipment as "Farman" and "Mirage".
        1. +1
          19 December 2021 00: 54
          What it means
          time is different and comparing equipment is as ridiculous as "Farman" and "Mirage".
          It's about one time! Even in the pre-war period, Italians had wetsuits and "oxygenators" ... And in general, in the 30s - early 40s who were armed with breathing apparatus, they were all "oxygenators"! And in the USSR, back in the 30s, the fleet had light diving equipment, in the form of wetsuits and oxygen breathing apparatus! And whatever the "oxygen" was, at that time they fully allowed the Italians and the Red Navy sailors of the Red Banner Baltic Fleet to carry out tasks!
          And the amerikosov (at the same time), chavoy, were dressed, in addition to swimming trunks, only in fins and masks ...! sad
          1. -1
            19 December 2021 04: 55
            And the amerikosov (at the same time), chavoy, were dressed, in addition to swimming trunks, only in fins and masks ...! sad

            Do you seriously think so? laughing They also had an emergency exit from submarine boats in the 30s only in fins and masks? It's not even funny.
  5. +8
    17 December 2021 19: 53
    There was someone to learn from ... Before the Americans, SBS was formed for the same tasks in Britain ...
  6. +6
    17 December 2021 20: 36
    Allow me a question - Will there be an article about the Baltic company of special purpose IV Prokhvatilov?
    Or during the Great Patriotic War in the USSR, there were no military diving units not associated with EPRON?
    And the Soviet underwater breathing apparatus VIA, IPA, ISA?