Electric and Hybrid Powertrains for U.S. Army Vehicles

26

Maintenance of an HMMWV car with a standard diesel power plant. US Department of Defense Photo

The US Army is trying to study and master any new technologies that can provide certain advantages. She recently turned her attention to electric and hybrid powertrains for automobiles. Full-scale research and design work of various kinds has already been launched. If they succeed, the Pentagon may update its plans to develop an army vehicle fleet.

Prospective projects


Leading American developers of military equipment, seeing the interest of the armed forces and other customers, have already proposed several concepts for military electric vehicles. In the presence of real orders, such projects will be developed and tested. The new vehicles will then have a chance to enter supply, although such results are not guaranteed.



One of the first projects proposed was a deep modernization of the serial Oshkosh JLTV armored car. Its developer points to the fundamental possibility of replacing a mechanical transmission with electrical systems driven by a standard diesel engine. If necessary, the hybrid armored car will be able to work as a mobile power plant.

However, the Pentagon has not yet become interested in this proposal, and only vehicles with a standard transmission based on mechanics enter the army. It is not known whether the customer will change his opinion, but it is quite possible that over time the army will come to such a decision. JLTVs are set to be produced within the next 20 years and the hybrid project could get the attention it wants.


Oshkosh JLTV armored car in serial configuration. In the future, it could get a hybrid powertrain. US Department of Defense Photo

Right now, General Motors Defense is mastering the mass production of light multi-purpose vehicles ISV (Infantry Squad Vehicle). In their current configuration, they are equipped with a turbocharged diesel engine and an automatic transmission with four-wheel drive. In this type, the vehicles are delivered to the troops for trial operation.

A few months ago, it became known that GM Defense had developed and built an experimental version of the ISV with an all-electric propulsion system. It is now undergoing factory testing and is scheduled to be presented to the Pentagon. It is possible that some of the vehicles required by the army will eventually be built in an updated electrical configuration.

Last year, GMC unveiled the Hummer EV, an all-electric platform that will power civilian pickups and SUVs. Recently it became known that a multi-purpose military vehicle will be created on the basis of this platform. Such a machine can become a functional analogue of the existing HMMWV: it will be a transport for people and goods, or a carrier of weapons and special equipment.

Scientific approach


As you can see, the American industry is already ready to create new electric vehicles for the Pentagon with sufficiently high performance and wide capabilities. However, the army is in no hurry to accept such proposals and first intends to carefully study new technologies. So, this year, a major study was carried out to determine the real scientific and technical potential of electric vehicles.


A promising family of manned and unmanned vehicles based on the JLTV chassis. Perhaps the project will use hybrid systems. U.S. Department of Defense graphics

The Powering the US Army of the Future study was launched in April at the initiative of the Army's Command of the Future. They were recruited by six commercial companies in the automotive and electrical industries. Within two months, they had to study all the basic concepts of electrical power plants, finding their strengths and weaknesses. They also had to be compared with the JP8 diesel units.

Overall, the study confirmed the already known facts about electrical power plants. It has been re-established that EVs have pros and cons, but the ratio is still far from ideal. Accordingly, such a technique is unlikely to be of interest to the army - both now and in the long term.

It has been confirmed that the electric installation is more economical in financial terms than the diesel one, and also surpasses it in some characteristics. Thus, electric motors improve the dynamics of the car and provide more torque over a wide range of speeds. In addition, they differ in times less acoustic and thermal signature.


A multipurpose vehicle GM Defense ISV with a diesel engine. Photo GM Defense

However, there are significant problems. For example, diesel converts liquid fuel directly into mechanical energy for propulsion. An electric car can be charged from a diesel generator, but in this case an additional stage of energy conversion is added to the overall chain, which reduces the final efficiency of the entire system.

In terms of energy parameters, existing batteries cannot be compared with liquid fuel. For example, the energy from burning 1 gallon (3,8 L) of JP8 fuel is equivalent to charging a 140 lb (63,5 kg) lithium-ion battery. Accordingly, to replace the 87-liter fuel tank "Humvee" requires a battery weighing almost 1,5 tons. Obviously, such "modernization" of the car simply does not make sense.

Unlike a car with an internal combustion engine, an electric car cannot carry fuel cans with it, and needs an energy source to charge it. Thus, at bases or during deployment, additional generation and distribution systems will have to be provided to meet the "demand" for new technology. In addition, in this context, there is a time-consuming problem: filling diesel fuel into the tank takes several minutes, while charging an electric vehicle can take several hours.

The survivability and combat stability of electric vehicles is highly questionable. Traditional propulsion systems are well suited to this type of requirement. Thus, damage to the fuel system does not always lead to an immediate fire, and the engine still retains the ability to work for some time and take the car out of the fire. In the event of similar damage, the battery will at least fail and immobilize the electric vehicle. In addition, there is a high risk of immediate fire or explosion, and modern batteries are extremely difficult to extinguish.


Possible appearance of the Hummer EV in the military configuration. GMC graphics

Directions of development


The main result of the research "Powering the US Army of the Future" was the conclusion about the lack of perfection of "clean" electric power plants. With all their advantages, in terms of the combination of technical, operational and economic characteristics, they are inferior to traditional systems with internal combustion engines.

This lag is based on the insufficient capacity of the current batteries. Despite all the progress of recent years, they are still inferior to liquid fuels. This limits the characteristics of the equipment, and also requires the creation of a special complex infrastructure for it.

The authors of the study believe that in their current form, electric vehicles are not of practical interest to the army. The expected progress in the battery field is unlikely to change this situation in the short and medium term. Nor should the army be expected to be able to create all the necessary infrastructure within a reasonable time frame.

If the army still intends to switch to electric traction, then it should pay attention to hybrid power plants. Chassis with diesel generators, batteries and traction motors differ from "clean" electric vehicles by a better balance of basic functions and capabilities. In addition, the available technologies already make it possible to create a car with an acceptable level of performance.


Three variants of QinetiQ EX-Drive electric transmissions for vehicles of different classes. QinetiQ graphics

It should be noted that the hybrid direction is already developing under the supervision of the army. Right now, several projects of this kind are being implemented in various fields. On an initiative basis and by order of the army, projects of vehicles of different classes are being worked out and the first experiments in the field of armored vehicles are being carried out. How successful they will be will become clear in the near future.

Thus, the Pentagon is seriously interested in promising developments in the field of power plants for ground technology and is doing everything possible to master this direction. So far, work in this area is mainly reduced to the first studies, on the basis of which plans for the future will be drawn up. What these plans will be, how soon and to what extent they will be realized - time will tell. It is quite possible that in the medium term, the US Army, showing interest in any promising technology, will nevertheless begin the transition to electric transport.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    18 December 2021 07: 48
    "Hybrid" is no longer relevant. Give me hydrogen !!!
    1. 0
      18 December 2021 08: 04
      Quote: andrewkor
      "Hybrid" is no longer relevant.

      Uh-huh, a hybrid Abrams, and a trailer with a battery on a trailer.
      Give me hydrogen !!!

      Quite right !!! It burns better wassat
      1. 0
        18 December 2021 11: 34
        So that's why they took care of mobile mini-nuclear power plants!
        The main thing here is that the length of the power supply cable is sufficient.
        1. +1
          19 December 2021 05: 54
          You can remember the series of books "The Huge Black Ship", there were Mega-tanks with a nuclear power plant.
      2. 0
        18 December 2021 23: 58
        And it explodes!
  2. -1
    18 December 2021 12: 00
    the most important thing is not to be disposed of. exploded and exploded. but interestingly, the battery swells strongly in the hybrid
  3. +5
    18 December 2021 12: 01
    The expected progress in the battery field is unlikely to change this situation in the short and medium term.

    And in the long run too. Simple thing. Everyone forgets that when it "burns"
    gasoline (diesel fuel, firewood), then from the atmosphere "for free" they take 1 kg of 3 kg of oxygen on average. So any accumulator obviously loses in joules per kg, since it carries all the components of the conversion of chemical energy into electrical energy with it. And this ratio of 1 to 3 reduces the 100% efficiency of the electric motor.
    to the level of the locomotive.
    So 1 horse and a battery for 20 minutes is the limit of electric toys. Further, all the "charms" (and they are) of the electric drive melt in the required dollars. Unless they come up with a battery that sucks oxygen from the air.
    And it makes sense to put a "hybrid" only where the weight of the transmission (gearboxes, shafts, gearboxes and couplings) is greater than that of electric motors. And without cryogenics for 200 horsepower, you can't step in weight either.
    So go for a ride on e-bikes - that's it. laughing
    1. -1
      18 December 2021 12: 46
      There is already such a battery that consumes oxygen from the air, but it is simply unnecessary.
      The main advantage of batteries, in contrast to fuel, is that they provide electricity, not thermal energy. This means that the efficiency of the engine is 5-6 times higher on average (the efficiency of electric motors is average 95+, for internal combustion engines the efficiency is average below 20%. 40% is there only at ideal speed, which is almost never found). And the size and resource of the engine is an order of magnitude better
      1. +2
        19 December 2021 20: 34
        The main advantage of batteries, in contrast to fuel, is that they provide electricity, not thermal energy.


        But while the main disadvantage of batteries is low energy density of 200 W * h / kg for lithium at best compared to 4 kW * h / kg for diesel fuel, and the efficiency of an electric drive (inverter-asynchronous motor, battery cooling system, motor, inverter) is 90% and the diesel engine is 40%. well, there are still losses on the transmission, but in any case, all this is covered by a twenty-fold difference in the energy density of the fuel.
    2. -2
      18 December 2021 13: 16
      Quote: dauria
      .................. So 1 horse and a battery for 20 minutes is the limit of electric toys.

      ............ A 45 tonne eDumper climbs a 13% incline to transport 65 tonnes of rock to the cement plant. It is so heavy that as he descends into the quarry, the regenerative braking system generates most, or even all of the energy needed to climb the mountain. Clever! According to its creators, eDumper actually produces more power than it consumes. And the use of batteries as a source of energy saves about 50 tons of diesel fuel per year ........
      https://topgearrussia.ru/news/40604-edumper+-+samyiy+bolshoy+elektromobil+v+mire
      1. +8
        18 December 2021 13: 34
        According to its creators, eDumper actually produces more power than it consumes.

        So they need to contact the Paris Academy urgently. They stopped considering projects of "perpetual motion machines" in 1775. wassat
        And even Americans !!!! ceased to issue patents for perpetuum mobile.
        1. -3
          18 December 2021 18: 25
          Quote: dauria
          They stopped considering projects of "perpetual motion machines" in 1775.
          You have not read carefully. The dump truck from the hill is loaded and with electric motors, in the mode of generators, it charges the batteries. And this charge is quite enough to roll the unloaded (already light) car up the hill to the place of loading.
          1. +2
            18 December 2021 22: 04
            Quote: Bad_gr
            You read inattentively.

            Did you read what you wrote yourself?
            45 ton eDumper rises on a 13% slope to take out 65 tons
            when he goes down to the quarry
            1. -3
              18 December 2021 23: 34
              Quote: Tima62
              Did you read what you wrote yourself?
              45 ton eDumper climbs 13% incline, .......
              That is, 45 tons go UP
              Quote: Tima62
              ..... to take out 65 tons
              when he goes down to the quarry
              65 tons are going down. At this moment, he turns the generators, charging the batteries.
              And in the text with the mention of a career, most likely, a typo, and you should read not "B", but "FROM" the career.
              The information on the dump truck is not secret, you can find more links, but I think the meaning of what is written is already clear.
              By the way, what you attribute to me, I did not write, I quoted the following text:
              The .45 tonne eDumper climbs a 13% incline to transport 65 tonnes of rock to the cement plant.
              1. 0
                19 December 2021 00: 01
                Why didn't you use the ore pass?
              2. -1
                19 December 2021 00: 15

                https://dailytechinfo.org/auto/10635-mashiny-monstry-e-dumper-samyy-bolshoy-v-mire-elektricheskiy-avtomobil-kotoromu-prakticheski-ne-trebuetsya-podzaryadka-batarey.html

                https://bespilot.com/news/359-3891767

                https://itc.ua/blogs/elektricheskij-samosval-edumper-blagodarya-rekuperativnoj-sisteme-zaryazhaet-sebya-sam/

                https://knowhow.pp.ua/edumper/
              3. +1
                19 December 2021 01: 11
                It's clear. Initially, you provided not the best link with a lousy translation. In your next links it is written quite clearly - The organization of the quarry gave the E-Dumper a unique opportunity to generate the energy it needed. An empty dump truck climbs a mountain where it is loaded with 60 tons of stones. Driving down a 13-degree slope with a heavy load, the E-Dumper uses its engines as electric generators to charge its huge battery. And the energy generated in one descent is enough for the empty E-Dumper to climb the mountain again for the next loading.
                By the way - 13 degrees is equal to 23%, it's very tough. In our quarry, the permitted lifts for dump trucks are 10%, and then, only lifts to the product warehouse. In trenches, the rise is much less. 20% are allowed only for bulldozers,
          2. +2
            18 December 2021 22: 27
            Quote: Bad_gr
            The dump truck from the hill is loaded and with electric motors, in the generator mode, it charges the batteries. And this charge is quite enough to roll the unloaded (already light) car up the hill to the place of loading.
            Delivering ore to the quarry? An interesting interpretation of mining)
            1. -4
              18 December 2021 23: 47
              Quote: Zufei
              Delivering ore to the quarry? An interesting interpretation of mining)

              This is not my interpretation of mining, but your understanding of my words:
              Dump truck walking down the hill loaded..........., charges the batteries And this charge is enough to unloaded (already light) car roll up on the hill, to the place of loading.

              Next time, I probably will draw up my messages in the form of comics so that I do not receive such comments.
            2. -4
              19 December 2021 00: 10
              Quote: Zufei
              Delivering ore to the quarry? An interesting interpretation of mining)

              Is that so clear, or explain what is drawn?
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +2
      19 December 2021 06: 34
      There is an alternative engine that does not need a gearbox at all or a simple one for two or three gears - a well-forgotten steam engine on liquids boiling at low temperatures, in the twenties did not go due to the lack of effective insulating materials (fast consumption of the working fluid and, as a result, an unpleasant smell)
  4. 0
    18 December 2021 17: 50
    when it descends into the quarry, the regenerative braking system generates most, or even all of the energy needed to climb the hill. Clever! According to its creators, eDumper actually produces more power than it consumes.

    It is very likely that the creators skipped physics classes, both at school and at the institute. They did not pass physics, she passed them unnoticed.
  5. +3
    18 December 2021 18: 06
    Quote: BlackMokona
    The main advantage of batteries, in contrast to fuel, is that they provide electricity, not thermal energy. This means that the efficiency of the engine is 5-6 times higher on average (the efficiency of electric motors is average 95+, for internal combustion engines the efficiency is average below 20%. 40% is there only at ideal speed, which is almost never found). And the size and resource of the engine is an order of magnitude better


    I'll correct it a little. Efficiency 90+ percent, this is the lot of KEM. Plus losses for speed control and conversion. Plus charge / discharge loss. Percent 60-70 maximum.
    But the size and resource will directly depend on the speed.
    1. +2
      18 December 2021 21: 07
      Multiply by the efficiency of the boiler, steam turbine, generator, transformers, batteries, losses in power lines - and where then will the efficiency of a car without an internal combustion engine be? .. This article also says:

      For example, diesel converts liquid fuel directly into mechanical energy for propulsion. An electric car can be charged from a diesel generator, but in this case an additional stage of energy conversion is added to the overall chain, which reduces the final efficiency of the entire system.
  6. -1
    18 December 2021 22: 31
    The Taliban are waiting for new products, they are interested in everything, they are children.
  7. +1
    19 December 2021 20: 29
    Well, a hybrid diesel-electric drive can still be (although why), and a pure electric car with the current energy density of batteries (200 W * h / kg) for SUVs, not to mention the military with armor and other body kit, is a useless idea. The runs will be small, and off-road and completely ridiculous.