Russian arms sales have been falling for the third year in a row. Can this be fixed?

103

Deck multipurpose fighters MiG-29K from Russia buys India, photo: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Specialists of the reputable Stockholm Peace Research Institute (SIRPI) published a press release on sales at the beginning of the week weapons 100 largest defense companies in the world. The published material notes that sales of Russian weapons by companies included in this rating have been falling for the third year in a row.

Published on December 6, 2021, the press release touches on global arms sales in 2020. Despite the coronavirus pandemic, which will not recede in any way, the 100 largest military-industrial companies in the world last year increased their arms sales by 1,3 percent compared to 2019. At the same time, the total volume of arms sales of hundreds of companies reached $ 2020 billion by the end of 531. Compared to 2015, the companies managed to increase sales by 17 percent at once.



The Stockholm Institute has been working with arms sales data since 2015, as this is the first year that sales figures for Chinese military industrial companies have appeared in the SIRPI database. The cumulative arms sales of the world's XNUMX largest defense companies have been growing for the sixth consecutive year, according to researchers.

Arms sales by Russian companies fall for the third year in a row


The SIPRI Top 100 lists 9 Russian military-industrial companies. Their total sales in dollar terms in 2020 fell 6,5 percent to $ 26,4 billion (2019: $ 28,2 billion). According to Swedish experts, this indicates a continuation of the trend that has emerged since 2017 - it was this year that arms sales by Russian companies included in the rating reached their peak.

By comparison, US companies in the SIPRI Top 100 account for 54 percent of all sales, or $ 285 billion. U.S. companies posted 2020 percent sales growth in 1,9. Companies from China accounted for 13 percent or $ 66,8 billion in monetary terms (an increase of 1,5 percent). The share of companies from the UK accounts for 7 percent or $ 37,5 billion in monetary terms (an increase of 6,2 percent).


In the foreground is a support fighting vehicle. tanks "Terminator", BMPT has export potential, photo: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

At the end of 2020, military-industrial companies from Russia accounted for 5 percent of the total sales of companies from the SIPRI Top-100 rating. At the same time, Russian companies showed some of the most significant sales drops. The Stockholm Institute emphasizes that this is directly related to the completion of the large-scale State Arms Program for 2011-2020. Delays in deliveries caused by the spread of the coronavirus pandemic also played a role.

According to SIPRI, sales of the Russian company Almaz-Antey dropped by 2020 percent in 31, and that of Russian Helicopters and United Shipbuilding Corporation by 13 and 11 percent, respectively. At the same time, the United Aircraft Corporation was able to increase sales by 16 percent. Even greater growth was demonstrated by Concern Radioelectronic Technologies (KRET) and Ruselectronics, which managed to increase sales in 2020 by 22 and 39 percent, respectively.

In addition to the cumulative drop in sales, an important feature of Russian military-industrial companies, according to SIPRI experts, is the continuing diversification of product lines. Russian defense companies are working to sell as many civilian as possible, not military products. A state program is being implemented in the country, according to which the share of civilian products in the structure of revenue of defense industry companies should reach 30 percent by 2025 and 50 percent by 2030.

How the decline in sales is explained in Russia


The Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (FSMTC) and Rostec have already called the data published by SIPRI formal. As noted in RBC, Rostec considers this information distorted and does not reflect reality. The main complaint of Russian state-owned companies is that the Swedes tie all payments to the dollar. At the same time, the bulk of the products of the Russian defense industry is accounted for by the state defense order program, payments for which are carried out in rubles. At the same time, SIPRI does not take into account the exchange rate difference.

Indeed, the SIPRI rating brings everything to the dollar as a common denominator, which allows comparison of all companies in the world, in whatever country they operate. In this regard, it is absolutely logical that Russian companies from the SIPRI Top-100 achieved their best results in 2017, when the average annual dollar exchange rate was 58,3 rubles. At the end of 2020, the average annual dollar exchange rate was 72,126 rubles. Such a serious devaluation of the Russian national currency directly affected the sales of Russian weapons in dollar terms.


Mi-8 and its modifications are one of the main products of the Russian defense industry, photo: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

The second claim of Russian companies to the rating does not look so convincing anymore. Russian experts note that the Stockholm Institute relies on data from open sources, without presenting a real picture of sales. The FSMTC also noted that the rating does not take into account statistics on the maintenance of already delivered military equipment, as well as the trade in spare parts for it.

It is quite logical to object to this that the rating itself is based on data from open sources for absolutely all countries, and it equally does not take into account the sale of spare parts and maintenance of military equipment for all companies, not just Russian ones. SIPRI is an institution, not a secret service, so the information provided by Swedish researchers is incomplete for all countries.

Obviously, both Chinese and American companies can conduct deals that do not come to the attention of the Swedes, and there is nothing strange about that. Especially when you consider that even public Chinese civil companies that are listed on American exchanges are not famous for their transparency in their reporting. In this regard, SIPRI tries to conduct research with the information that is available, reducing it to a common denominator and one currency.

With all the pros and cons of this approach, you just have to put up with it, since there is simply no other organization in the world that would conduct research of a similar volume and publish it in the public domain.

Can Russian companies earn more from arms sales?


Russian companies can certainly earn more from arms sales. The volume of sales in dollars could easily be increased simply by strengthening the national currency. However, in the near future, economists do not see any prerequisites for a significant strengthening of the ruble against the dollar.


ZRPK "Pantsir-S1" and the launcher of the S-400 "Triumph" air defense system, Russian air defense systems with good export potential, photo: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

At the same time, the most ambitious in the modern day was completed in the country. stories army rearmament program. The state program for the procurement of weapons for 2011-2020 allowed the Russian armed forces to be brought to a completely new level of power. The downside is that less and less money will be spent on the purchase of weapons and military equipment inside the country.

Export is the only way for Russian military-industrial companies to increase sales. And this very export has been stable in recent years, or, translating from the language of the bureaucracy into Russian, it is stagnating. All recent years, the export of Russian weapons has been revolving around one figure - 15 billion dollars a year, fluctuations from this value are extremely insignificant.

In recent years, US sanctions have also hampered the increase in Russian arms exports. In an interview with Vedomosti, Ilya Kramnik, a researcher at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences, noted that only strong and politically important countries for the United States, such as India, can acquire Russian weapons. Note that, in turn, countries such as Indonesia and the Philippines are forced to refuse purchases of Russian weapons. At one time, the Philippines has already abandoned Russian helicopters in favor of American ones, and Indonesia cannot fulfill its desire to acquire Russian Su-35 fighters.

The second problem, in addition to the sanctions, Kramnik called underrepresentation in the market or our complete absence in popular segments. A prime example is the patrol aviation... For geographical reasons, such aviation is in demand and is actively developing in the regions of Southeast Asia, where there are countries that traditionally buy Russian weapons. But Russia cannot offer them anything today. This direction completely sags, even for the Russian armed forces.

The second observed failure in the international market is unmanned aircraft. UAVs actively growing segment, but Russia produces only small and reconnaissance UAVs. True, here the Russian industry can please with promising developments in the field of strike and strategic drones, which over time can be brought to the world market.


Work Robot demining "Uran-6" in the Syrian Palmyra, photo: Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

The drop in sales of the Russian Helicopters holding is due, among other things, to the fact that the bulk of its sales for many decades has been accounted for by one model - the Mi-8 and its modern modifications. No matter how good this helicopter is, it is necessary to bring an adequate replacement to the international market. It is obvious that the sales of attack helicopters, either in individual terms or in monetary terms, will never be able to bypass the sales of military transport helicopters.

With airplanes, the situation is somewhat different. This is still one of the most important components of domestic military exports, but the fourth generation Su-30 fighter and its modifications were purchased by almost all countries that just wanted it. At the same time, the UAC definitely has something to increase sales: this is, first of all, the export potential of the multipurpose Russian fifth generation fighter Su-57 and the new light tactical fighter Checkmate, in the marketing promotion of which Russian defense companies have already invested heartily.

Russia has the greatest export prospects in the field of hypersonic weapons, where we are one of the world leaders. Russian electronic warfare systems also have good prospects, which is already confirmed by sales. Robotics is also a promising area. In the field of ground systems, Russia in recent years has shown quite a lot of complexes that are able to interest buyers. And Russian sapper robots have shown themselves well in Syria, including when clearing mines in Palmyra.

Traditionally, domestic air defense systems have a high export potential. The Almaz-Antey company has completed a large-scale program of rearmament of Russian troops for the S-400 Triumph system and can now fully focus on its export deliveries. As even the Americans note, at least a dozen countries of the world have a substantive interest in the Russian air defense system. At the same time, Russia already has a trump card in its sleeve in the form of the S-500 air defense system, which, over time, may also be exported.
103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    11 December 2021 05: 24
    Someone says that a weak ruble is a blessing for enterprises and businesses, now the article says that the reason for the fall in sales is a weak ruble ... what however wonderful.
    And so the sale of weapons is comparable to the sale of energy resources at a profit ... even more profitable in terms of developing technologies, jobs, conquering the sales market ... business is nothing personal if we sell the C400 and hyper-missiles profitably to Iran or North Korea.
    1. +26
      11 December 2021 05: 41
      And what has the ruble to do with it? Typical methods of selling Russian weapons are loans and barter. Loans are usually not fully repaid - they are "forgiven", but you know the "barter" - like: palm oil in exchange for fighters .... They are such effective managers ... winked
      1. -9
        11 December 2021 09: 05
        Quote: Snail N9
        Typical methods of selling Russian weapons - loans and barter

        Well, if they are typical, then give a few examples.
        But not from the history of the USSR.
        1. +24
          11 December 2021 11: 24
          Quote: Alexey Sommer
          Well, if they are typical, then give a few examples.
          But not from the history of the USSR.

          2018 year
          A loan to Armenia in the amount of $ 200 million for anti-aircraft and radar systems.
          Bangladesh received a $ 2013 million loan in 800 for training aircraft.
          Cuba also received a $ 50 million loan.
          55% of the four Russian S-400 air defense systems purchased by Turkey for $ 2,5 billion were financed through a Russian loan.
          Loans to Venezuela.
          The first loan of $ 2 billion was received in 2009.
          The second and third loans, worth $ 4 billion each, were disbursed in 2012 and 2014. Each loan was used to purchase tanks, planes, helicopters, missiles and small arms.
          Venezuela is defaulting on its payments, forcing Russia to convert the deal into a 10-year financing plan. And now the country is reportedly lagging behind the adjusted payment schedules.
          Syria receives free or discounted surplus equipment and services from the Russian military.
          An intelligence post was set up in Nicaragua in exchange for free equipment.
          The delivery was generally free, only for the fact that they would vote with Russia at the UN.
          I hope this list suits you.
          1. -8
            11 December 2021 13: 33
            Yes, but just tell me who doesn't? Russia, like everyone else, provides financial loans in extremely limited amounts, always pursuing transparent political goals.
            1. +7
              11 December 2021 14: 18
              Quote: Robert Legoev
              Yes, but just tell me who doesn't?

              Please read below, I gave an example there.
          2. -20
            11 December 2021 17: 02
            and where is the documentary evidence of your chatter ???
            1. +11
              11 December 2021 17: 47
              Quote: Seeker
              and where is the documentary evidence of your chatter ???

              You can contact Rostec and Rosoboronexport with the same request,
              and you can submit documents refuting what is published in Defense News.
      2. -25
        11 December 2021 17: 45
        Russia did not forgive any loans for its deliveries, does not forgive and will not forgive - and barter is only equivalent in value to the supplied goods - it is only the USSR that piled mountains of weapons in mountains of the world for free and thanks.
      3. 0
        12 December 2021 21: 58
        This palm oil eats everything up.
    2. +11
      11 December 2021 07: 03
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      business is nothing personal if we sell profitably S400 and hyper-missiles to Iran or North Korea.

      Russia has the greatest export prospects in the field of hypersonic weapons, where we are one of the world leaders.

      This is generally a complete out !!! Let's sell YARS with Sarmatians right away?
    3. +10
      11 December 2021 08: 36
      "Someone says that a weak ruble is good for enterprises and businesses, now the article says that the reason for the fall in sales is a weak ruble ... what is strange, however."
      You misunderstood! A weak ruble does indeed favor exports as it does. it makes the products cheaper. a weak ruble is the reason for the underestimation of the cost of weapons sold domestically and, as a consequence, the alleged decrease in sales in dollars. Roughly T90 costs 120 million rubles, in 2017 at the rate of 58r / $ it is 2 million dollars, and in 2020 1,5 million. But this is so-so excuse, we really have failures in many areas: patrol aviation is a very vivid example, all light armored vehicles are all Soviet, we are in the tail of UAVs, we are far from being leaders in naval issues, etc.
      1. +10
        11 December 2021 10: 23
        Quote: Eroma
        A weak ruble does indeed favor exports as it does. it makes the products cheaper. a weak ruble is the reason for the underestimation of the cost of weapons sold inside the country and, as a consequence, an alleged decrease in sales in dollars. Roughly T90 costs 120 million rubles, in 2017 at the rate of 58r / $ it is 2 million dollars, and in 2020 1,5 million. But this is so-so excuse

        You are 100% right.
        But not only this, the enterprises of the military-industrial complex receive what part (or we do not fully know this) from the state for production within the country, and possibly for sale abroad, before the conclusion of contracts and budgetary funds are diverted for this that could be spent on others expense items.
        What is not done in other countries.
        Firms do product development at their own expense. And then they look for a buyer in the market or, depending on the purpose and need, are financed from the budget. And only then the state purchases a certain amount of the product, and if it does not meet the requirements, then it does not purchase.
        For example, the same SIRPI report contains such lines.
        Arms sales three top 100 Israeli companies reached $ 10,4 billion, or 2,0 percent of total arms sales.
        At a time when the share of Russian firms accounted for 5,0% of the total arms sales in the TOP-100.
        In Israel, the state has allocated funds to these firms only during the knockdown period and gave permission to work.
        The rest of the time they produce products within the framework of the free market, and the state receives its interest in the form of taxes.
        1. +4
          11 December 2021 13: 03
          I think that other budget items do not suffer from budget spending on arms exports. As it turns out, the bureaucracy is capable of assimilating funds with some efficiency for a result at a certain speed, if they are given more than they can sensibly distribute, the money is simply stolen. feel to improve the situation in other articles, it is necessary to raise the efficiency of the officials responsible for the result, then it will be possible to finance more projects bully
          R&D without prepayment of the customer is not carried out by anyone, it takes a lot of money to develop serious systems, gunsmiths do not have so much
          Personally, I am not against barter transactions, if they don’t know how otherwise.
          1. +4
            11 December 2021 14: 13
            Quote: Eroma
            I think that other budget items do not suffer from budget spending on arms exports.

            In order to produce some kind of weapons, money is needed for everything from raw materials to final products. Facilities
            have been spent from the budget, but the products have not yet been sold.
            In the case when it is bought for cash, everything will be justified.
            And if they don’t buy, or, as is customary, from you, they give the buyer a loan, which will return, and if it does, then when.
            All this is distracted from other budget items.
            Quote: Eroma
            R&D without prepayment of the customer is not carried out by anyone, it takes a lot of money to develop serious systems, gunsmiths do not have so much

            It all depends on how the economic component is built, both the country and the firms.
            Just one example.
            Renowned LORA, the program is funded by several clients and IAI expects more clients to join as it gains traction.
            In 2018, it was put up for sale to the Israel Defense Forces, but no purchase decision was made. And as the media wrote, Azerbaijan has these weapons.
        2. -2
          11 December 2021 22: 58
          What is not done in other countries.
          Firms do product development at their own expense. And then they look for a buyer in the market or, depending on the purpose and need, are financed from the budget. And only then the state purchases a certain amount of the product, and if it does not meet the requirements, then it does not purchase.

          Such a scheme is not effective, and you gave not the best example of Israel, the same Merkava was ordered by the Israeli military, requirements were developed for what the military wanted, and weapons were created for these requirements.
          In the USA, USSR, China, Germany, Britain, everywhere in all developed countries, this system works the same. The military orders what they need and the developers develop it, then test it, and if the sample matches, then the weapons go into production. The same sample that was ordered by their military is offered to foreign buyers, who in turn can add their own requirements. And I don't know to develop for my own money that no one will
          1. +6
            12 December 2021 07: 11
            Quote: ramzay21
            Such a scheme is not effective and you gave not the best example Israel, the same Merkava was ordered by the military of Israel,

            I want to argue with you.
            This is not the best example you gave.
            There are strategic weapons, which he orders for the protection of the state, and this is only for internal use, and not for sale.
            The tank you named is so, here you can add Jericho, the ARROW missile defense complex, etc.
            Another example.
            There are about 20 companies in Israel that are engaged in the development of drones, for money
            who are attracted to the free market.
            When the army needs it, a tender is announced and only then money is invested in production.
      2. +2
        11 December 2021 12: 58
        And if you just tie any sales not through the floating exchange rate of the ruble, but through a stable monetary unit? Swiss franc, for example.
        1. +3
          11 December 2021 14: 17
          Quote: SKVichyakow
          Swiss franc, for example.

          Maybe gold? Always in the price.
          1. +1
            11 December 2021 14: 20
            Quote: bairat
            Quote: SKVichyakow
            Swiss franc, for example.

            Maybe gold? Always in the price.

            It's not about the price, it's about stable prices.
    4. -1
      12 December 2021 19: 19
      A weak ruble is just PROFITABLE for Russian exporters ...
    5. 0
      12 December 2021 19: 27
      In general, in order to really increase the export of weapons (and not only ...), it is necessary to give REAL freedom to SMEs in the Russian Federation, and not "freedom" from the hands of officials with unreasonable checks, corruption, kickbacks, etc. ... stable (for decades ...) tax policy - one should learn from China, and not suffer from legislative itching in the Duma several times a year ... By the way, it is the frequently changing laws in the tax (and not only) sphere that create good ground for corruption ... Accident or ... ???
  2. +2
    11 December 2021 06: 44
    Quote: Snail N9
    palm oil in exchange for fighters

    well at least not for panamas wink
    1. 0
      11 December 2021 12: 12
      Palm tree, at least we got something. Not bad loans and endless restructuring.
  3. 0
    11 December 2021 06: 53
    Despite the coronavirus pandemic, which will not recede in any way,

    And what does a pandemic have to do with it? request
    Weapons like viruses do not get sick and do not tolerate them, and even more so they do not infect anyone
    1. +7
      11 December 2021 09: 29
      you can blame everything on a pandemic
  4. +5
    11 December 2021 07: 07
    Why fix it? By and large, selling weapons is a strange way of making money, although it is accepted everywhere. The state and the national bank are pouring funds into the creation of high-tech products that go abroad. And in exchange they receive money for which you can buy something for yourself; more simple and necessary goods at home. Instead of making them right away at home ..... You can even buy palm oil ... Of course, a certain owner-master "becomes from this a billionaire, but is it not disgusting for someone else to look at such a cat?
    1. +11
      11 December 2021 09: 19
      Quote: ivan2022
      why fix? By and large, selling weapons is a weird way to make money ...

      I disagree with you. The development of modern types of weapons and ammunition is only possible for a state with a strong science and advanced industry. Accordingly, science pushes weapons forward, and those, in turn, push science forward. This time.
      Arms exports tie the buyer to the seller for a long time. And this is also important. Politics...
      The proceeds from the sale of weapons can be invested in the same science and the development of a high-tech industry, not on "clothes and toys." These are three.
      Export is also useful by increasing serial production, which means reducing the cost of one unit. A small batch may be enough for your army, and export increases it.
      And as for the stagnation of sales in Russia, there is nothing surprising in this. Permanent strong trading partners (China and India) buy less than before, and the rest are not so rich or are under the political and economic pressure of Democrats.
      Competitors do not sit idly by, so more and more need to be spent on R&D from year to year, and this is science, and it comes from education, and with education, the difficulties are well-known to everyone. There are not many truly breakthrough technologies, but they cost a lot, and it will not work to sell them to "everyone you meet" either. The basis of the military-industrial complex is the modernization of the Soviet reserve. But it will also end someday ...
      1. +6
        11 December 2021 13: 22
        It is best to tie buyers to yourself by releasing a cheap and high-quality product for any purpose. And before selling weapons, it is reasonable to bind a partner to yourself in advance by tying it to political commitments and military alliances. This is what everyone does except us. You have to be with great developmental peculiarities in order to sell the best weapons to the Turks or India. Better to just work better and harder, like China or Japan.
        1. +5
          11 December 2021 15: 14
          Quote: ivan2022
          And before selling weapons, it is reasonable to bind a partner to yourself in advance by tying it to political commitments and military alliances.

          It is very difficult, and often unrealistic ... What are the agreements with the same Turkey or China, Algeria or Malaysia ..?
          Quote: ivan2022
          to sell the best weapons to the Turks or India ...

          This is capitalism, unprincipled real capitalism. "Business and nothing personal" ...
          Quote: ivan2022
          Better to just work better and harder, like China or Japan.

          Of course better.
          Only this is where to find hundreds of millions of hardworking and law-abiding population, and a nationally minded leadership, for whom their own country is the highest goal ...
          Quote: ivan2022
          It is best to tie buyers to yourself by releasing a cheap and high-quality product for any purpose.

          Controversial. For high quality and not cheap is unique. Yes, and tying with socks and toys, irons and buckets is unlikely to work "seriously and for a long time", but tanks and planes need to be serviced for decades, and changing the serviceman is almost impossible, because it is very difficult and expensive ...
          1. 0
            11 December 2021 17: 37
            Quote: Doccor18
            tying with socks and toys, irons and buckets is unlikely to work "seriously and for a long time",

            Quote: Doccor18
            but tanks and planes need to be serviced for decades, and changing the serviceman is almost impossible, because it is very difficult and expensive ...

            It is, but for a time of peace... And it is also possible to direct the weapon against the one who sold it. As one friend of mine used to say: "Why do you need a lot of shells? You won't even have time to release these." In the hot period, long service staff is absolutely not required!

            A good trader is one who has much more with him than he sells. And can Russia boast of this? There is a favorite tale in our propaganda about "echelons with raw materials that went to Germany until the very beginning of the Second World War." So what is being done now is much cooler.
            1. -7
              11 December 2021 17: 52
              There is a favorite tale in our propaganda about "echelons with raw materials that went to Germany until the very beginning of the Second World War." So what is being done now is much cooler. This is called a business and there are no tales - we give them goods, they give us money, they also open their own production facilities in our country, and so the accumulated foreign investments in the Russian economy for 2021 amounted to 740 billion dollars.
              1. +2
                11 December 2021 22: 12
                Quote: Vadim237
                The Russian economy in 2021 was 740 billion.

                As it does not add up.
                Therefore, the Central Bank's data differ from KPMG's calculations: inbound direct investments in Russian assets in the first six months of 2021 amounted to $ 11,3 billion after an outflow of $ 1 billion in the first six months of 2020 and an inflow of $ 16,7 billion over the same period in 2019.

                Moreover, the more direct investment leaves the country than it comes in.
                According to the calculations of Dmitry Polevoy, Investment Director of Loko-Invest Management Company, for the first 9 months of 2021 (the calculation for the third quarter was made on the basis of preliminary data on the balance of payments) the volume of incoming direct investments is estimated at $ 16,2 billion against $ 2,5 billion for the same period of a year ago, that is, for the last 4 quarters - this is $ 24 billion. Outgoing investments from Russia in January-September amounted to $ 26,8 billion against almost zero a year ago, the amount for the last 4 quarters - $ 33,7 billion. " Therefore, the balance of direct investments since the beginning of the year is this is $ 10,6 billion against + $ 2,7 billion in 2020, which indicates a significant deterioration in the dynamics ", - emphasizes Polevoy.
                https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2021/12/09/899826-vlozheniya-fondov-pryamih-investitsii
            2. +5
              11 December 2021 18: 26
              Quote: ivan2022
              ... And it is also possible to direct the weapon against the one who sold it.

              Quote: ivan2022
              A good trader is one who has much more with him than he sells.

              You can't argue with that. Absolutely agree.
              Quote: ivan2022
              ... And can Russia boast of this?

              In Russia there is a very large percentage of pious believers in the absolute invulnerability and total superiority of our Strategic Missile Forces. They are referred to every time the conversation comes to a logical dead end: "Then we will bang, and the whole world is in dust" ...
      2. +3
        11 December 2021 13: 37
        There is an international ranking of countries - - arms sellers. China - 6% of the market. Russia - - 25% of the market. Compare the GDP of China and Russia and you will see where there is reason, and where is not a reasonable desire to sell at least something just to sell. Even to the detriment of yourself. Fantasy !
        1. -3
          11 December 2021 18: 00
          The Chinese authorities are going to significant financial losses, trying to squeeze their competitor, the Indian light fighter Tejas, from the international market. So we saw where is the mind and where is the reasonable desire to sell at least something just to sell - at a disadvantage for yourself. And yes, Chinese defense products are not in mass demand, since for the most part they are of poor quality, in contrast to Russian, hence the difference is 19%.
          1. +3
            12 December 2021 01: 31
            The Chinese authorities are going to significant financial losses, trying to squeeze their competitor, the Indian light fighter Tejas, from the international market.

            It's funny, did it take a long time to come up with it? Tejas cannot even beat the JF-17 in sales, it is not a competitor. List in service of which countries Tejas is in order to call it a competitor to anyone.
        2. +4
          12 December 2021 01: 07
          There is an international ranking of countries - - sellers of weapons. China - 6% of the market. Russia - - 25% of the market.


          For the first time, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute ranked China above Russia in the list of the world's largest arms manufacturers. According to SIPRI, in 2017 the largest US companies sold weapons for $ 226,6 billion, Chinese - for $ 54,4 billion, Russian - for $ 37,7 billion.
          China overtook Russia to become the world's second largest arms producer after the United States. This is evidenced by a new study on the largest arms manufacturers.

          https://www.forbes.ru/newsroom/biznes/391983-sipri-vpervye-postavil-kitay-vyshe-rossii-v-reytinge-mirovyh-proizvoditeley
  5. +13
    11 December 2021 07: 30
    Mi-8 and its modifications are one of the main products of the Russian defense industry,

    Mi-8 .. first flight on June 24, 1961.
    The Soviet groundwork is the basis of our weapons ... no matter what they say.
    1. 0
      11 December 2021 13: 27
      But I don’t really understand why MI-8 and its modifications did not please? Put on a new dviglo and electronics - and he will show himself wow. One hell - nothing particularly breakthrough in the helicopter industry has yet been observed. What then is the point of making a completely new carcass?
      1. +2
        11 December 2021 14: 34
        Quote: paul3390
        But I don’t really understand why MI-8 and its modifications did not please?

        fellow Everyone was pleased. Masterpiece. Exactly what is the point - Soviet masterpiece.
        Namely - Simple and inexpensive, but extremely efficient and versatile machine.
  6. +4
    11 December 2021 07: 55
    The United States is putting pressure on the exporting countries of Russian weapons, it is clear that sales will fall, if not puff and swagger, but any sane person understands that the weight of the United States, at least for the time being, still has and the loot put into the budget for the fight against Russia is working.
    1. +1
      11 December 2021 10: 11
      Learn ... it will come in handy ...
      (exporting countries, do not swagger, sane at least)
      But the thoughts are correct! good
      1. 0
        11 December 2021 13: 50
        Importers, well, I was wrong.
  7. +8
    11 December 2021 08: 00
    ... Russian arms sales fall for the third year in a row

    Despite the fact that the consumption of weapons in the world is growing. Sales in other countries are growing. Turkey has increased the export of military products tenfold in three years. And he is not going to stop there.
    1. 0
      11 December 2021 09: 07
      Quote: Stas157
      Turkey has tenfold increased export of military products in three years

      This is growth from "0".
      Here you can grow 100 times.
    2. +2
      11 December 2021 09: 13
      Quote: Stas157
      increased tenfold in three years

      Well Duc, if you count from almost zero, then it is not surprising.
      And 15 yards should be multiplied, this is perhaps in the case of some kind of apocalypse,
      1. +2
        11 December 2021 14: 42
        There is a wonderful scene for this occasion:
  8. -5
    11 December 2021 08: 26
    so maybe the peoples have gone to war?
    1. +15
      11 December 2021 09: 43
      Every year the world arms market beats a record. There are those same F-35s that fail, according to Topvar, make 150+ units and want to expand to 180 annually. For comparison, the Su-57 hopes to make 4 pieces a year, under the tree. For the first time in a long time, the Germans had a queue of export ships at ThyssenKrup - now 2 for Egypt, then they cut steel by 3 for Algeria, then on the site of the pumped out 4 they will build 2 for Algeria and XNUMX more for Egypt in anticipation.


      Spain is busy with Arabs, Leonardo is recording record profits, and the Fiancanteri shipyards are 100% busy.
      1. +6
        11 December 2021 10: 43
        Every year the world arms market beats a record. There are those same F-35s that fail, according to Topvar, make 150+ units and want to expand to 180 annually. For comparison, the Su-57 hopes to make 4 pieces a year, under the tree. For the first time in a long time, the Germans had a queue of export ships at ThyssenKrup - now 2 for Egypt, then they cut steel by 3 for Algeria, then on the site of the pumped out 4 they will build 2 for Algeria and XNUMX more for Egypt in anticipation.

        Long-term factors of the collapse of the USSR began to operate.
        The time has come to update the equipment not only in Russia, but also in those countries where we sold 30 years ago.

        Why does Algeria buy ships from the Germans? Because 3 TFR project 1159 of the "Dolphin" type and 3 MRK project 1234 "Ovod" of the Algerian fleet of the 80s. It's time to change.

        So it is with the rest of the weapons in other countries, planes for the Bulgarians, tanks for the Poles, etc.
        The 30-40 year cycle of operation of Soviet weapons is coming to an end and a battle is underway for this market. fellow
      2. -12
        11 December 2021 18: 08
        This F 35 product was invented for the scattering of suckers - its NATO allies for dozens of design flaws, expensive operation and maintenance; low engine resource is 15% less than declared, and so on, and its combat effectiveness remains at the level of 4 generations of fighters.
  9. Eug
    +4
    11 December 2021 09: 45
    In the sale of any complex technical products with a long service life, there is such a concept as cyclicality. Maintenance and repair of already delivered weapons and military equipment can only smooth it out. And barter is very appropriate, but it requires the most thorough economic and financial elaboration. In the context of sanctions, as for me, an interesting method for expanding foreign supplies, potentially expanding the circle of customers and reducing risks.
  10. -6
    11 December 2021 09: 51
    It is foolish to be surprised at the drop in Russian weapons sales, given that the United States has a huge influence on many countries in the world, both direct and indirect, with the United States declaring an unspoken war on Russia on all fronts except the hot one. So if you remove the pressure and coercion of the United States to choose Russian weapons by many countries, then Russia would become equal to the United States.
  11. +1
    11 December 2021 09: 54
    Decline in sales of Russian Helicopters holding due, among other things, to the fact that the bulk of its sales for many decades has been accounted for by one model - the Mi-8 and its modern modifications.

    Or maybe because in 2015, Doctor of Economics Anatoly Eduardovich Serdyukov was added there:
    On December 11, 2015, he joined the Board of Directors of the Russian Helicopters holding (part of the Rostec State Corporation).
    Since May 10, 2016 - Chairman of the Homeowners' Association "Molochny-6", which manages one elite club house of six apartments (two of which belong to Serdyukov, three to his sister Galina Puzikova).
    In 2017, he was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors of PJSC Rostvertol and a member of the Management Board of PJSC United Aircraft Corporation (UAC).
    On May 8, 2019, he was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors of the UAC, under his leadership, a reform of the country's aviation industry is being prepared.
    1. +11
      11 December 2021 10: 32
      And until 2015, of course, there were Napoleonic plans? Without personalities, what did he do or did not do?

      Kazan themselves profiled their own Mi-8. Now they sell only to full homeless people and on state loans, that is, they take the board at a minimum price and alarm clocks in the cockpit - that is, the plant receives a minimum of money from such a helicopter, is forced to cry into a vest every year and ask for money for salaries and government orders. The Mi-38 has yet to make itself known, and the production of a single series of zero series does not bring any money. Ansat is either alive or dead. While the series is being held on artificial life, the Ministry of Defense said enough, now he was shoved into the NSSA, although competitors from the Manturov team (UZGA) and Bell are collecting from the box in the same place.


      Ulan-Ude is great. On the other hand, they make candy from their Mi-8. However, objectively they do not have the strength for NG. Maybe if A3 shoots for the oil and gas industry, they will pick up and together with Mil they will carry out the long-awaited global modernization of the Mi8.


      Rostov - they continue to rape Crocodile, but export orders are decreasing and decreasing, despite a serious increase in firepower and means of detection. In fact, in terms of shock capabilities, it was brought to the Mi-28N.

      They continue to make the Mi-28NE - but the export flow has dried up. They continue to make GOZ. They continue to make the Mi-26T, but again there is no money. Thanks to Algeria that it partially financed T2, to which the Ministry of Defense has now come running ready. However, again, the sales stream is gone + nothing good for the engines.


      Kumertau - here I must say thanks to Serdyukov. He just raised the question, whether you are optimizing and reducing, or spinning and we will even give money for specific projects. As a result, they spun and finally released something good. True, certification in 23 is already too slow. There, of course, a lot has been updated inside + a modern aerobatic complex, but it's really long time to certify it for 1,5 years.


      Arseniev - everything is bad traditionally. The Ka-62 is behind the times, all potential clients have already invested in Augusta (a screwdriver in Russia). Now only crumbs, and with the price oriented towards the rich oil industry, he cannot really pick up these crumbs. Well, they are doing the Ka-52.
      1. +2
        11 December 2021 10: 38
        Quote: donavi49
        Kumertau - here I must say thanks to Serdyukov. He just raised the question, whether you are optimizing and reducing, or spinning and we will even give money for specific projects.

        Excuse me, this phrase is too expensive for the country:
        So, for 2019, he reported, indicating in his declaration income in the amount of 170 million rubles, which is 14,2 million rubles per month and 233 times higher than the average earnings of UAC employees (61 thousand rubles). And for 2018, Serdyukov's declaration indicated an amount of 213 million rubles - a million for each working day of an "effective manager" with a criminal past.
        1. +7
          11 December 2021 10: 40
          Well, does Sechin earn less? And Miller? And Gref who also flies into scandals.
          1. +7
            11 December 2021 10: 42
            So I say:
            - Nothing costs us so dearly or appreciated so cheaply as the work of effective managers. Yes
            1. +2
              11 December 2021 17: 33
              Quote: ROSS 42
              - Nothing costs us so dearly or appreciated so cheaply as the work of effective managers.

              Everything is relative. And today even Serdyukov is beginning to look not so bad in relation to the current leaders.
              1. +2
                11 December 2021 18: 35
                Everything is relative. And today even Serdyukov is beginning to look not so bad in relation to the current leaders.

                If the embezzler who almost destroyed the army starts to look good against the background of someone, then for our country this is the final station.
                1. +3
                  11 December 2021 18: 39
                  This is what we are talking about. Complaints about the dominance of ostentation suggest that the army during the war 8.8.8 looked both more aggressive and simply better.
                  1. 0
                    13 December 2021 17: 18
                    Serdyukov ceased to be defense minister in 2012, almost 10 years ago. So the window dressing, which really flooded the MO, has a very indirect relationship to it.
                    Army 8.8.8. - this is a "mad max" on the wreckage of Soviet weapons of the 80s. She still had enough for Georgians, of course ...
                2. +3
                  13 December 2021 17: 21
                  Serdyukov himself is an extremely odious person, but he by no means destroyed the army. On the contrary, from the completely decomposed corpse of the Soviet Armed Forces, they have made something new. I recall the opinion about Minister Sukhomlinov:
                  "... No matter how you relate to them, it should be recognized that the new Minister of War did a great service to the Russian army, removing it from the anarchy and insanity it was in. Before the arrival of Sukhomlinov, there was a disorganized armed impotence, with the advent of Sukhomlinov it became organized armed force (albeit far from perfect). "
                  This, in my opinion, is also true of Serdyukov.
      2. -7
        11 December 2021 18: 30
        The problems with the global economy associated with the pandemic will end and orders from foreigners will again appear for all this equipment. And according to the new state defense order, up to 2033, they will pledge from 20 to 30 trillion rubles.
  12. +4
    11 December 2021 09: 57
    Russian arms sales have been falling for the third year in a row. Can this be fixed?

    At the current stage of the historical process - NO !!!
    It is in vain that there are collected "the best of the best" minds of effective management ... feel
  13. +18
    11 December 2021 10: 46
    ... The real reason for the fall in arms exports is that Soviet technologies have become obsolete for 30 years and the current authorities are not able to develop a new one, such work must be financed continuously, and not on holidays.
    The rearmament program has been disrupted completely, to replace the Su-27 with its own modifications that the Indians did not buy due to the fact that they are already outdated, this is not rearmament, but patching holes. It is necessary to re-equip on the Su-57, and the regiments are both Su-27 and Su-30 and Su-35, this process must go on continuously, and it is necessary to produce at least 30-40 Su 57 per year, then the cost price will also be reduced in 10 years it is possible to re-equip all air regiments of heavy fighters, and at the same time develop the next generation aircraft and the export modification of the Su-57.
    There was no rearmament of light Su-29 fighters at all, since there is nothing to re-equip, it is necessary to create a light MiG fighter of the 5th generation, from the backlog of the Su-57, with characteristics close to the F-35 in terms of EPR and avionics capabilities, and not drag around the show with wooden models.

    What rearmament of the army, if not a single modern AWACS aircraft, not a single tanker entered service, there is no and a new ASW aircraft is not being developed, these aircraft, especially AWACS and PLO, are the basis of any modern army.

    With the rearmament of the fleet, everything is even worse, instead of combat-ready frigates and corvettes, the fleet received non-combatable MRKs, instead of a series of inexpensive corvettes capable of carrying out anti-aircraft defense and air defense, funderwales are being built at the price of a destroyer.
    1. +4
      11 December 2021 11: 49
      The real reason for the fall in arms exports is that Soviet technologies have become obsolete for 30 years and the current authorities are not able to develop a new one, such work must be financed continuously, and not on holidays.

      Yes. But also the absence of real management, which we so love to talk about.
      Third world countries need weapons mainly for prestige and fight with each other. They still won't pull against the States.

      So. For export to Nicaragua and Cameroon, if you take aviation, you need the cheapest plane with one engine, cannon, 4 suspensions, the easiest to operate. 20 million bucks maximum.

      But we will have a business in Russian. We will give Cameroon a loan of a billion, and for this loan a dozen Su-35s.

      And then we will understand and forgive. love
      1. -13
        11 December 2021 18: 31
        Russia has not forgiven anything and will not forgive in terms of supplies and payments - stop writing crap.
        1. +2
          11 December 2021 18: 49
          Russia has not forgiven anything and will not forgive in terms of supplies and payments - stop writing crap.

          Cuba, Uzbekistan, Syria, Kyrgyzstan, Nicaragua and many other countries have been forgiven debts by our leadership for many billions of dollars in order to again supply these countries, including weapons, they talk about this very quickly and once in the news, but you either do not remember or are lying wassat
    2. +3
      11 December 2021 18: 21
      Quote: ramzay21
      The real reason for the fall in arms exports is that Soviet technologies have become obsolete for 30 years and the current authorities are not able to develop a new one.


      good
    3. -9
      11 December 2021 18: 42
      "The real reason for the fall in arms exports is that Soviet technologies have become obsolete for 30 years and the current authorities are not able to develop a new one."
      the same aircraft and missile weapons.
      The rearmament program was completely disrupted This is where nothing was disrupted in aviation, according to the program, the renewal and modernization of the park was laid by 70%; it was carried out by the Strategic Missile Forces up to 90% by ground forces 70% in the air defense up to 80% - and only with the fleet there are problems.
      And not to drag around the show with wooden models. "And no one on the show with wooden mock-ups" And the Su 75 was not dragged along by the ready-made glider demonstrator for static tests there and the real engine is AL 41 and the avionics of the landing gear cockpit and everything else - the flight copy will be assembled in 2023, and before that, a few more copies for static tests.
      1. +9
        11 December 2021 22: 38
        This is what in aviation, nothing was disrupted there according to the program, the renewal and modernization of the park by 70% was laid

        Where did you count 70%?
        The Russian Air Force had about 500 Su-27 and MiG-29 fighters, and 70% of this figure should be about 300 Su-57 aircraft, and in fact 1 Su-57, this is 0,5%
        In strategic aviation there were 16 Tu-160s, 16 of the same Tu-160s were upgraded 0%
        In MRA and DA there were several hundred Tu-22M2 / M3 not replaced with new ones, this is 0%
        In VTA, not a single An-26, An-12, An-124, An-22 has been replaced with a new one, several modernized Il-76s have come to replace the Il-76, this is less than 1%
        IL-38 PLO aircraft, not a single new PLO aircraft has come to replace it, development is not being carried out 0%
        Il-78 tankers no new aircraft arrived, this is 0%
        AWACS A-50 aircraft, not a single new aircraft arrived, this is 0%
        We completed the rearmament program only for fire support helicopters, Ka-52 and Mi-28, and that's all in aviation. For other planes it is about 0 or 0. What if not a failure?
        1. 0
          16 December 2021 03: 55
          On the whole, I agree, but in terms of fighters, we have a priority in the direction of 4th generation vehicles. They have been collected enough for now.
          1. +1
            20 December 2021 06: 52
            Generation 4 fighters are not being assembled because of such a plan, but because it is not possible to produce Generation 5.
            You have to be a complete idiot to collect generation 4, while the whole world is moving to the 5th generation. In 10 years, a couple of thousand F-35s will be produced, the Chinese will produce several hundred of their 5th generation aircraft, and our generation 4 air forces will be at the level of African countries in terms of their capabilities.
            1. 0
              20 December 2021 08: 57
              France does not buy the 5th generation, Germany does not buy the 5th generation, Turkey, Sweden also does not buy the fifth generation. All developed countries of Europe do not purchase the 5th generation)))). Buy vassals like Japan. South Korea and then its 4.5 sculpts. I'm not sure that everything is as you say.
              1. 0
                20 December 2021 09: 04
                Quote: sportline
                France does not buy the 5th generation, Germany does not buy the 5th generation, Turkey, Sweden also does not buy the fifth generation. All developed countries of Europe do not purchase the 5th generation)))). Buy vassals like Japan. South Korea and then its 4.5 sculpts. I'm not sure that everything is as you say.

                Well, France and Germany are understandable - it is for them to bury their plane (eurofighter). And about developed countries - you just wrote nonsense
                Canada, Japan, Italy, England, Israel, Holland Australia, etc. - not developed?
                What reality do you live in?
                1. 0
                  20 December 2021 09: 21
                  These are not developed countries. High technology is lacking in these countries. There is no nuclear technology, no aircraft construction, no engine construction. Except for anime and shoes, they don't release anything.
                  As for me, I think that the life cycle cost of the F-35 after purchase is 670 million dollars. Let them buy these planes and spend the entire military budget on their maintenance. We are a tank country, and the F-35 in general will have to fight the S-400 and S-500. Well, in the confrontation with these systems, it has long been clear that the F-35 has no advantage.
                  1. 0
                    20 December 2021 09: 40
                    Quote: sportline
                    These are not developed countries. High technology is lacking in these countries. There is no nuclear technology, no aircraft construction, no engine construction. Except for anime and shoes, they don't release anything.
                    As for me, I think that the life cycle cost of the F-35 after purchase is 670 million dollars. Let them buy these planes and spend the entire military budget on their maintenance. We are a tank country, and the F-35 in general will have to fight the S-400 and S-500. Well, in the confrontation with these systems, it has long been clear that the F-35 has no advantage.

                    Sorry baby talk, check out these countries' industries
                  2. +1
                    21 December 2021 03: 21
                    There is no nuclear technology, no aircraft construction, no engine construction. Except for anime and shoes, they don't produce anything.

                    You do not know, of course, that the Japanese produce the Kawasaki P-1, the best PLO aircraft in the world, as well as other excellent aircraft.
                    We are a tank country

                    This concept was outdated in the late 1970s.
                    and the F-35 in general will have to fight the S-400 and S-500. Well, in the confrontation with these systems, it has long been clear that the F-35 has no advantage.

                    The F-35 in conjunction with the E-2 Hokkai will fire off our complexes with anti-radar missiles beyond the visibility range of our S-400s, limited by the radio horizon, that is, about 100 km. At the same time, both E-2 and F-35 will be in complete safety.
                    1. 0
                      21 December 2021 11: 38
                      The concepts don't change. One tactical nuclear strike destroys everything that is based on it. And Japan, lacking a normal air defense and missile defense system, is an easy target with its entire fleet. It would be another matter if the mattresses were supplied by THAAD. But only the USA has THAAD. Consequently, the rest of the missile defense protection does not have.
                      Further. I do not consider developed countries like Japan. There are no nuclear technologies, there are no defense technologies with rare exceptions, and there are no resources. But there is a huge national debt.
                      If a country does not build a submarine for itself, does not build a nuclear power plant, does not have space technologies, does not have defense technologies and aircraft construction, then I do not consider it developed.
                      Because consumer goods do not need to make a lot of mind. And it is not necessary. And what I have mentioned above gives the main thing - SOVEREIGNTY.
                      1. +1
                        21 December 2021 18: 59
                        Do you at least read about Japan before making such statements. The Japanese have one of the most advanced air and anti-aircraft defense systems in the world, and their submarines are some of the best.
                        Their air defense is saturated with a large number of ground antenna posts, short, medium and long-range air defense systems, as well as F-15 fighters, all these delights are controlled by AWACS aircraft, and therefore the actual range of detection and destruction of air targets is much greater than the detection range of our S-400 limited by the radio horizon.
                        The truth is that their air force is capable of breaking through our air defense, but we do not have their air defense.
                        Their submarines can easily overcome our PLO and our submarines will not be able to overcome their PLO.
                        And the Japanese have space technologies, they have been launching rockets into space for a long time.
                    2. 0
                      21 December 2021 11: 42
                      Just a strange skew looms. France, which meets all the criteria of a developed country and a superpower, does not have American garbage in its arsenal, as does Germany. And all the satellites and vassals, without sovereignty, buy it avidly.
  14. -10
    11 December 2021 11: 56
    It is not correct to compare the methods of selling their weapons to the United States and Russia. The United States sells whatever it wants to its allies, and sometimes instead of its own allies. France is an example of this.
    1. -13
      11 December 2021 18: 44
      In this matter, the United States still has those craftsmen.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. +6
    11 December 2021 21: 41
    They don't think so. They do not want to use Rosstat's methods. Sales are growing, we are overtaking America, the ruble is strengthening, prices are falling. If you don't believe me, ask Putin.
  17. +3
    12 December 2021 00: 48
    The main problem of the Russian Federation in the arms business is that since Soviet times, in modern terms, a client base has been formed from "progressive countries" that are building socialism, or non-aligned. But somehow it so happened that these countries in economic terms (with few exceptions, India, China) were untenable in terms of economics. And today they remain so. And the technique is changing. It, in contrast to the simple and understandable combat vehicle of the 50-70s, has become high-tech and expensive. You can't put an Ethiopian ace in the cockpit of the Su-57 and F-35 ... And they have money ... The problem with the development of the S-300 in Syria is a clear confirmation of this. Far from being the most modern system, but what are the difficulties with the development. Well, if only to produce an African version of the Su-75 for 20 million greens and exchange for bananas ... Someone buys 80 Raphales for 80 lard, someone F-35 for 10 lard. But we do not have such clients (no longer) - those who create their own with their heads and money and compete with us (China), someone leaves us for shopping in the West-India - patrol aircraft from the USA, land and sea air defense systems from South Korea and Israel, avionics from Israel, Rafali from France .. There is no Warsaw Pact either ... Prospects are not very good. Unless to sell Iskander to daddy, he will pay with a bulb!
    1. 0
      16 December 2021 03: 52
      We hardly invest in development. The completion of the Su-57 will soon reach 15 years by 2027. It's a shame. What's going on in shipbuilding? A shame. And so everywhere. The queue is only for air defense.
  18. +4
    12 December 2021 08: 40
    HM. If its own army does not need its own pieces of iron (well, or it cannot afford them), who cares about them?
  19. +1
    12 December 2021 08: 42
    Quote: Gunter Preen
    It is not correct to compare the methods of selling their weapons to the United States and Russia. The United States sells whatever it wants to its allies, and sometimes instead of its own allies. France is an example of this.

    Colleague, who prevents the homeland from forming its client base?
  20. +1
    12 December 2021 10: 40
    nothing powerful ruler of the regime because
  21. 0
    13 December 2021 16: 26
    In my opinion, there is a generational change in the military-industrial complex. The old generation is leaving and the backlog of the USSR ends, and the new generation cannot show itself .............. Because they are sharpened for another, for them patriotism or Motherland are empty words.
  22. 0
    16 December 2021 03: 48
    Rather, the point is that we will send money to support the business of the aligarkhat, instead of investing in design research. As a result, our technology does not keep pace with the generally accepted trends and our products are late with the market launch.
    But aligarhat has its own fleet and does not lose profit when foreign markets are closed.
  23. -3
    16 December 2021 14: 16
    "Russian arms sales have been falling for the third year in a row. Can we fix this?" - raise the level of computer graphics and replace the voice of the announcers with a more confident one.