NATO Black Sea Exercise: Maneuvers, Reconnaissance And Risks

19

Based on its plans and strategies, NATO maintains a strong interest in the Black Sea region. Directly in the Black Sea and on the territory of the neighboring countries of the Alliance, various events are regularly held with the involvement of various forces and means - according to the official version, to practice countering the "Russian aggression". Moreover, such maneuvers are often themselves aggressive in nature and directly threaten our security.

In recent weeks


The next potentially dangerous actions of NATO, accompanied by unfriendly statements, could be observed from the end of October until the last days. New international naval exercises were held in the Black Sea with the involvement of ships and aviation several countries in the region. In addition, other activities were carried out in parallel in the surrounding areas, incl. in the order of full deployment and combat service.



In late October and early November, several US Navy pennants from the 6th fleet... These were the command ship USS Mount Whitney (LCC-20), the destroyer USS Porter (DDG-78) and the tanker USNS John Lenthall (T-AO-189). The ships made friendly visits to the ports of Turkey, Georgia and Romania, and then headed to the area of ​​future exercises. There they were joined by the Romanian frigate Mărășești and the Turkish Yavuz.

Curiously, the recent exercise was not pre-planned. Despite this, within a few days the international ship detachment gathered and completed all the main tasks. Joint maneuvering, target search, etc. were carried out. The skills of an auxiliary character were also tested. For example, American sailors refueled the destroyer Porter from the escort tanker.


During training events, the ships of the three naval forces constantly interacted with aviation. With its help, illumination of the situation, reconnaissance of the forces of a conditional enemy, etc. It is curious that the planes and helicopters operated not only within the designated sea range. NATO aviation was also spotted in other areas, incl. far enough from the ships.

For example, on November 10, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported that on the previous day, our Aerospace Forces had detected and escorted a number of air targets. An E-8C reconnaissance and control aircraft, an RC-135 strategic reconnaissance aircraft and a P-8A patrol aircraft belonging to the US armed forces were spotted directly over the Black Sea. In addition, a French C-160G aircraft operated from one of the Romanian air bases. Outside the naval range, over the territory of Ukraine on the same day, a reconnaissance U-2 of the American Air Force was noticed and escorted.

The recovered NATO aircraft kept their distance from Russian airspace. At the same time, individual sections of their route approached our borders by 30-70 km, which is quite enough for conducting certain types of reconnaissance. In addition, NATO aircraft operated not only on November 9, but also on other days.

The exercise took several days, and the participants reportedly coped with all the tasks. On November 15 and 16, US Navy ships routinely left the Black Sea and headed for the Mediterranean to continue their voyage. Thus, the American ship detachment completed the necessary measures and did not violate the terms of the existing agreements on the length of stay in the Black Sea.

Russian reaction


The appearance of American ships in the Black Sea region did not go unnoticed by the Russian armed forces. Entry of ships into the Black Sea, all movements and actions, incl. within the framework of the exercises, they were constantly monitored by ground, ship and air assets of the Russian ground forces, the Navy and the Aerospace Forces. At the same time, no active steps were taken.


Against the background of these events, a number of important statements were made describing the current situation, its features and emerging risks. So, on October 31, when American ships entered the Black Sea, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov noted that the demonstration of the US flag in the region does not add stability to the world. However, Russia is ready for any threat and is capable of ensuring security in the region. Moreover, our country stands for cooperation, not confrontation.

On November 7, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu spoke about the current situation. According to him, the military constantly monitors and escorts foreign ships. At the same time, there is an understanding that any provocation may follow at any moment, and this should not be allowed. Shoigu called the exercises as a whole almost constant attempts to test the Russian defense on the Black Sea coast and in the southern direction.

The next day, the Foreign Minister named the reasons for the current exercises. They are connected with the desire of the United States and NATO to increase the policy of containing Russia - in violation of all the statements of the past. On November 9, an even more interesting statement was made by the press service of the Ministry of Defense. She described the current exercise as an attempt to study a potential theater of war.

On November 11, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov called the NATO exercise a provocation. He also recalled that Russia regularly calls on the US and NATO to take risks into account, but they continue to test our determination to defend their interests. Such assessments are given by the Ministry of Defense: on the same day, it called the current exercises aggressive actions on the part of the United States.

Clear threat


The United States and its NATO allies continue to conduct regular joint exercises in the Black Sea and in the surrounding regions - practically at the borders of Russia. At the same time, they simply ignore Russian warnings and continue to bend their line, which does not contribute to an improvement in the military-political situation both in the region and in Europe.


The recent exercise is broadly similar to the previous exercise, but it has several important features that should be noted. Some of them are perplexing, while others may well be perceived as an additional threat to our national security.

First of all, it is necessary to note the composition of the international naval squadron. It was based on only three warships - an American destroyer and frigates from Romania and Turkey. Obviously, the strike potential of such a group is very limited, although in this case there will be obvious benefits from the exercises. The battleships were escorted by a tanker, and some of them were able to work out the transfer of fuel at sea.

However, of greatest interest is the presence of the USS Mount Whitney (LCC-20) command ship, equipped with an advanced radio-technical complex. This pennant is able to independently and in interaction with other means monitor the situation in a large area, process the entire volume of incoming data and issue information to various consumers. The main task of the ship is to control the naval groupings, as well as to ensure their interaction with other branches of the armed forces.

It is necessary to pay attention to the activity of aviation. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, NATO planes and helicopters were almost constantly present in the exercise area and in the surrounding regions. It is noteworthy that these were mainly special aviation complexes with the possibility of reconnaissance and control.


All this makes it possible to determine the approximate goals of the past unscheduled exercises. It seems that the main tasks were working out joint actions under the leadership of the American command ship, as well as conducting reconnaissance and collecting data on the Russian defense in the Black Sea region. Joint maneuvering, refueling, etc. in this case, they were secondary tasks to cover the main events.

According to intelligence ...


It is easy to see that the latest exercises of foreign navies in the Black Sea are of particular importance for NATO strategists. With their help, it was possible to clarify some issues of interaction between the fleets, and also, probably, to collect additional information on the state of Russian defense in the region. Obviously, the collected data is used in the finalization of existing plans or in the creation of new documents.

Even the very fact of the presence of ships and aircraft of a potential enemy near our borders worries the military and political leadership. An additional cause for concern is the apparent attempts to conduct reconnaissance and open defenses. As a result, Russian officials rightly point out that NATO's Black Sea exercises do not help preserve peace and are even a provocation.

How successful the data collection operation combined with the exercise was is unknown. However, it can be assumed that its results will not please NATO strategists. Aircraft and ships could again establish that a full-fledged "zone of prohibition and restriction of access and maneuver" A2 / AD has been created and is operating in the Black Sea region. And this means that any rash actions and open aggression will not remain without an extremely painful response - and therefore, even exercises in the Black Sea should be carried out with great caution.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    17 November 2021 05: 28
    A full-fledged "zone of prohibition and restriction of access and maneuver" has been created and operates in the Black Sea region A2 / AD

    Because Crimea is Russia's unsinkable aircraft carrier!
  2. -4
    17 November 2021 05: 30
    ***
    “And the Dnieper will flow into the Pont Sea with three zherela, Ruskoe... "...

    Increase the time.
    ***
  3. +1
    17 November 2021 05: 44
    "Today we can look at this ship not only through binoculars, but also through the sight of defensive systems."
    (Vladimir Putin)

    NATO is fulfilling its tasks, the Russian army and navy are fulfilling theirs.
    Partners, however wassat
    1. 0
      17 November 2021 17: 22
      In the president's dictionary, the word "partner" means "potential adversary."
  4. +2
    17 November 2021 07: 03
    "High, high relationship" (c) Partners ... We look at each other through the eyepieces of the sights.
  5. -4
    17 November 2021 07: 07
    It's time to check the US shores for safety!
    1. +3
      17 November 2021 08: 01
      Who forbids?
      Inflate the mattress and go!
      1. -5
        17 November 2021 09: 04
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Who forbids?
        Inflate the mattress and go!

        Mattresses are inflated by your favorite youkrayna .. And Russia is always present there ... Nuclear submarines are on alert ... And that's enough.
        1. -2
          17 November 2021 10: 58
          Quote: 30 vis
          Russia is always present there ... Nuclear submarines are on alert ... And that's enough.

          Why are we minus? That our boats are not there !? Or don't you like the presence of Russian nuclear submarines off the coast of the United States?
          1. -1
            17 November 2021 23: 08
            That our boats are not there !? Or don't you like the presence of Russian nuclear submarines off the coast of the United States?

            Our boats have long been off the coast of the United States. You are confusing the fleet of the USSR superpower and the fleet of the Russian Federation.
            1. -1
              18 November 2021 08: 30
              Quote: ramzay21
              Our boats have long been off the coast of the United States. You are confusing the fleet of the USSR superpower and the fleet of the Russian Federation.

              I don’t confuse anything .. They forgot to tell us where the submarines of the Russian Federation are.
              1. -1
                18 November 2021 09: 35
                I don’t confuse anything .. They forgot to tell us where the submarines of the Russian Federation are.

                You have ironclad arguments! Our boats cannot leave the bases unaccompanied by NATO nuclear submarines, and you mean some trips to the shores of the United States.
                Yes, and we have very few combat-ready boats left,
                1. -1
                  18 November 2021 16: 34
                  Understood ! You are sitting in Gen. The headquarters and you know about everything .. How was it at Papanov's - The boss is gone! Pts. looks like your essays!
                  1. 0
                    18 November 2021 21: 54
                    In order to think with your own head, you do not need to be an employee of the General Staff. The real state of our fleet in general and the submarine in particular is known to everyone who is interested, and it is far from the state of the Soviet Navy, which was a real force.
                    If you prefer living in the world of pink ponies and hiding from reality, then this is your right, but not everyone wants it that way.
                    In 1905, there were also capricious moods, divorced from reality and bawled bravura about our mighty and strong fleet, two squadrons of which had been drowned by a country that had used rice instead of money 20 years earlier.
                    Now the situation is much worse than in 1905, and the US Navy is not the Imperial Japanese Navy of the 1905 model.
      2. -4
        17 November 2021 10: 51
        .Who prohibits?
        Inflate the mattress and go!
        It is too costly and inefficient. It is much easier to conduct at this time the exercises of our long-range aviation with access to the maritime borders of the United States and Canada, and instantly their interest in the Black Sea will disappear. This has been proven by decades of our confrontation, and always has a sobering effect.
        1. 0
          17 November 2021 17: 26
          Yes, a combined landing in the North Pole area is simpler and more useful. And the experience will be gained, and the North Americans will be well distracted from the Russian Sea.
        2. 0
          17 November 2021 23: 21
          It is much easier to conduct at this time the exercises of our long-range aviation with access to the maritime borders of the United States and Canada, and instantly their interest in the Black Sea will disappear.

          The United States has F-22 fighters in Alaska and E-3 aircraft, some will detect our few strategic bombers in time, others will take aim at them, from a distance at which the radars of our Tu-95 or Tu-160 will not even detect the F-22.
          The United States has more than six dozen destroyers, and the presence of one of them in the Black Sea will in no way affect the combat effectiveness of their fleet. Another point is that out of modern warships we have only two combat-ready frigates 22350, with much more modest capabilities than American destroyers, and if one of them is sent to the Caribbean Sea, then, firstly, the so modest combat capability of our Northern Fleet will sharply drop, and secondly , due to the lack of bases in that region, it is necessary to send a tanker and a tug together with the frigate, and it will look more like a joke than a detachment of warships.
          1. 0
            18 November 2021 17: 57
            ... The United States has F-22 fighters in Alaska and E-3 aircraft, some will detect our few strategic bombers in time, others will take aim at them, from a distance at which the radars of our Tu-95 or Tu-160 will not even detect the F-22.
            We have in service with strategic aviation cruise missiles with a flight range of up to 5 thousand km, and this allows them not to enter the US air defense zone. It will be too expensive for the United States to use fighters on long-term reconditioned patrols, and this is obvious.
            and it will sound more like an anecdote than a detachment of warships.
            You yourself confirm that sending our ships to the coast of America will be an empty undertaking.
  6. +4
    17 November 2021 09: 08
    What did this article forget in the "weapons" section? The site seems to have more than one section, doesn't it?