SpinLaunch project. Centrifugal into space

84

Experienced launcher Suborbital Accelerator

The forces of small private enterprises in the United States are now working on various options for systems for delivering cargo to orbit, incl. with unusual principles of work. For example, the California-based startup SpinLaunch has developed and tested a "suborbital accelerator" using the centrifugal principle of launching a load. The pilot plant successfully completed its first launch a few weeks ago.

Looking for an alternative


SpinLaunch (literally "spin launch") was founded in 2014 in Sunnyvale, California. From the very beginning, the company's only task was to develop a fundamentally new system of space launches, which has advantages over traditional rocket and space technology. Instead of chemical-fueled rockets and engines, the SpinLaunch system must use centrifugal force.



Over the next several years, the company carried out the necessary research and development work. Projects were created for the pilot and full-size SpinLaunch installations. The technology demonstrator, which has limited capabilities, received its own name Suborbital Accelerator ("suborbital accelerator"). The full-size system is accordingly called an orbital accelerator.


Under construction: installation of a vacuum chamber

Unlike other space startups, SpinLaunch hasn't paid much attention to advertising. Most of the work was carried out without much noise and regular loud News... However, by the beginning of 2020, she managed to get financial support from several investors and even interest the Pentagon.

2019-20 SpinLaunch has begun preparations for future tests. In particular, the headquarters of the startup moved to Long Beach, and for practical events they rented the space of the Spaceport America cosmodrome in the US. New Mexico. To date, an experimental launcher has been built there. On October 22, its first tests took place with the successful launch of a rocket simulator.

Centrifugal principle


The principle of operation of the SpinLaunch installation is quite simple, but its implementation is quite complicated in technical terms. At the same time, the successful solution of design problems allows one to obtain certain advantages of a technical, energy and even environmental nature.


Centrifuge drive design

The main and largest element of the SpinLaunch installation is a cylindrical vacuum chamber. Inside it is a centrifuge for accelerating the payload, and outside there is a guide tube running along a tangent, the upper end of which is hermetically sealed by a membrane. The complex also includes a support device, electric drives of a centrifuge, a pumping unit, etc. Depending on the required orbit, the tube chamber can be installed both vertically and tilted.

Inside the chamber is a centrifuge with a payload rocket holding device. During launch, it must pick up the design speed, imparting the required kinetic energy to the rocket. Then, at a given moment in time, the rocket is released, it enters the guide tube and leaves the installation through it, breaking through the membrane.


Centrifuge during operation

A special launch vehicle is offered for SpinLaunch. It is a reusable two-stage small-sized product with a payload compartment and its own limited-power propulsion system. The payload of such a rocket would reach 400 pounds (181 kg) for low Earth orbit.

As conceived by the developers, a full-size launcher should "spin up" and eject a rocket at a speed of more than 2200 m / s. Due to the accumulated energy, it will be able to rise to an altitude of more than 60 km in a minute, where its own engine will be launched for further flight into orbit. After the launch of the payload, the rocket should return to Earth to prepare for the next launch.

At different scales


To date, SpinLaunch has built a Suborbital Accelerator prototype and started testing it. This complex has a total height of approx. 50 m and ensures the launch of the rocket vertically upward. A smaller version of the rocket with a length of approx. 3 m. It does not have an engine, and the payload is made in the form of control equipment.


At the helm

The first launch from the pilot plant took place on October 22. Using 20% ​​of the rated power, the installation accelerated the rocket to a speed of "thousands of miles per hour", which raised it to an altitude of "tens of thousands of feet." At the same time, the exact characteristics of the launch and flight are not named.

In the coming months, the company plans to continue testing its "suborbital accelerator". It is planned to carry out up to 30 suborbital launches to test all systems. Then a transition to orbital launches is possible - if the real characteristics of the system allow it.

In the future, the company will complete the development and begin construction of a full-size "accelerator". It will be roughly three times the size of the prototype and will show corresponding performance characteristics. It is expected that this variant of SpinLaunch will be able to launch a real load into orbit and will be able to enter the launch services market.


A future launch vehicle for SpinLaunch

Advantages and disadvantages


According to calculations, already partially confirmed by tests, the centrifugal launch system has some advantages over traditional rocket and space complexes. However, there are also characteristic drawbacks, overcoming which turns out to be an extremely difficult task.

First of all, the calculated advantage of SpinLaunch is economy and energy efficiency. Unlike a launch vehicle, the centrifuge accelerates the payload smoothly and using an economical electric motor. Accordingly, acceleration and lift-off require less energy. According to calculations, such a launch will cut the amount of fuel required for further ascent into orbit by a factor of four.

An important advantage of SpinLaunch is the relative ease of preparation for launch. It is expected that such a system will be able to carry out several launches per day with a minimum interval. High productivity will have a noticeable impact on economic performance.


The ecological features of the project are also noted. So, the main work of the system will be performed with the help of electricity, which may have a "pure" origin. In the presence of a rocket with an engine, combustion products are generated in the minimum required amount and are emitted only in the upper atmosphere, where they pose a minimum danger to the environment.

The development company claims that new technical solutions can significantly reduce the cost of launching in comparison with traditional launch vehicles. According to calculations, this parameter can be increased to 500 thousand dollars per launch - less than 3 thousand dollars per 1 kg of load. Such a low cost will surely attract the attention of customers and contribute to an increase in the number of starts, which will also help to reduce prices.

To achieve these goals, however, several major challenges need to be addressed. First of all, this is the overall complexity of the design. Building a vacuum chamber tens of meters in diameter is not an easy task. At the same time, the operability and reliability of such a unit is critical for the entire starting system. Any crack and break in the vacuum can have the most serious consequences.


The second drawback of the system and the concept as a whole is the limited energy capacity. Even a full-size SpinLaunch system will be able to send less than 200 kg into low orbits, which will seriously limit the range of potential loads and customers. In addition, there is virtually no scope for scaling. The increase in the output load is associated with an increase in the size of the launcher, which already turns out to be excessively large and complex.

At the test stage


Apparently, the developers of the SpinLaunch system are well aware of all the strengths and weaknesses of their project. Talking about it, they focus on the advantages, while trying to figure out the disadvantages “behind closed doors”. How successful this work will be and whether it will be possible to obtain the optimal ratio of all characteristics - tests will show.

The first launch of a simplified "rocket" with test equipment took place a few weeks ago, and the tests will not stop there. For the coming months alone, approx. 30 launches with certain tasks. And based on the results of these activities, the ways of further development of the project will be determined. Of course, if the pilot plant confirms the calculated characteristics and shows the general feasibility of the project.
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    12 November 2021 05: 55
    Well done!
    This is an unusual approach to the issue of launching small satellites.
    1. +4
      12 November 2021 06: 52
      Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi
      An unusual approach

      1. +2
        13 November 2021 16: 34
        I give the guys an idea: to hide the installation inside a suitable Himalayan peak and launch immediately from a height of 9 km.
    2. -2
      12 November 2021 22: 31
      This is an unusual approach to the issue of launching small satellites.
      Crap. What a blinkeredness. Small and robust satellites can also be launched according to the Jules Verne principle. It is easier and more technologically advanced to provide tightness and gradual acceleration. And it is more economical as !!!! What is difficult to make an inclined curved trunk? Easily. And I'm not talking about gunpowder at all. They don't do that. Overcomplicating unnecessarily. Sending cargo is generally a nice thing.
      1. 0
        19 December 2021 00: 11
        or like Winnie the Pooh ... in a hot air balloon, current products can lift 1 kilos to an altitude of 400 km winked
  2. 0
    12 November 2021 06: 16
    More on meter monitors was spent in my opinion ... The stability of such an installation is questionable.
    1. +6
      12 November 2021 06: 52
      Quote: Wedmak
      More on meter monitors was spent in my opinion ... The stability of such an installation is questionable.

      We took an ancient Greek catapult, added some electronics and got no one knows what laughing
      Everyone has seen how astronauts are trained on centrifuges. The human limit is about 9G. And here, for a radius of 15 meters and a linear velocity of 2200 m / s, the centrifugal acceleration acting on the body will exceed 32 G. What structure of the satellite will withstand this? The same problem as for electromagnetic guns.
      1. -5
        12 November 2021 06: 57
        Well, rather not a catapult, but a sling. Principle 1: 1 in this case. What is strong in the West is the money spent on all sorts of not very adequate experiments in hardware. Sometimes it even works for a while, with the infusion of the same money in wagons.
        1. 0
          12 November 2021 07: 00
          Quote: Wedmak
          Well, rather not a catapult, but a sling.

          Both the catapult and the sling work on the same principle. It's just that the catapult provides for some mechanization, as in this case lol
        2. +10
          12 November 2021 07: 04
          Quote: Wedmak
          What is strong in the West is the money spent on all sorts of not very adequate experiments in hardware.

          "Americans always find the only right solution. After trying everyone else."
          Winston Churchill
        3. +14
          12 November 2021 07: 49
          What kind of drink in this case are we talking about? It is clear from the article that a private company is engaged in the development and manufacture of the installation. Moreover, he does it at his own peril and risk, as well as at his own expense. Yes, it, like any private company, hopes for profit in the future, but so far it has only losses. And potential customers, including the US Department of Defense, are looking at these works with interest, but they are in no hurry to spend budget money on them. It should also be noted that R&D in the West refers to high-risk projects, but in this case, a private company took the entire risk. So what about cutting you in vain. We should cut our cuts. And they, as a rule, are financed from the state budget, that is, from taxpayers' money, that is, from our money. No magic bedside table where money comes out of nowhere.
          1. -8
            12 November 2021 13: 22
            Not on their own, but on the money of stupid investors.
      2. +2
        12 November 2021 08: 00
        Tz EM cannons and conventional artillery pieces successfully fired smart projectiles
      3. +5
        12 November 2021 08: 19
        And here, for a radius of 15 meters and a linear speed of 2200 m / s, the centrifugal acceleration acting on the body will exceed 32 G

        Thanks for counting. Checked -32925, 17 ... Well, what then? Will not go into space - sold as a juicer. Freshly squeezed birch sap or maple syrup will do.
        1. 0
          12 November 2021 18: 14
          32000 G. I wonder what material the centrifuge is made of?
      4. +3
        12 November 2021 13: 34
        Quote: Cube123
        Everyone has seen how astronauts are trained on centrifuges. The human limit is about 9G. And here, for a radius of 15 meters and a linear velocity of 2200 m / s, the centrifugal acceleration acting on the body will exceed 32 G. What structure of the satellite will withstand this? The same problem as for electromagnetic guns.

        It never happened, and now again))) another expert on centrifuges, in the eyes of someone who had not seen read the article through a paragraph and ... I did it as usual))) screwed up)
        Written in black and white, in Russian, in printed type: tests of a prototype-layout of small sizes, to test the technology's performance, missed the brain)
        It is a pity that more and more comments on the content are more and more like the degrading Ukrainians ... Indeed, fraternal peoples. Only they write about the Russians, the Russians about the Americans. And so the content is almost the same - stupid, backward, sawing, can not do anything, substitute the right side and that's it.
        1. AUL
          +3
          12 November 2021 15: 02
          Quote: JD1979
          It is a pity that more and more comments on the content are more and more like degrading Ukrainians ...

          Yes, lately, the level of intelligence in the comments has been falling rapidly, unfortunately. And the level of articles too ...
      5. 0
        12 November 2021 17: 14
        What kind of satellite design will it withstand? The same problem as for electromagnetic guns.

        A flying radar will survive, for example. For radars, bowls are often made of metal mesh.
        The grid will easily withstand a release into the atmosphere or into low orbit and will allow you to look beyond the horizon for many hours, using it as a mirror - if equipped with a balloon. Well, or metal film.
        In addition, it is a cheap replacement for AWACS - if you launch not a huge and expensive plane with many people into a dangerous atmosphere, but a small computer and a mesh antenna.
  3. +1
    12 November 2021 06: 18
    But we have Robot Fedor! (Or was what )
    1. -2
      12 November 2021 08: 50
      it is developing very successfully now, already 50 pieces have been riveted in different configurations
  4. -4
    12 November 2021 06: 48
    Well done! Finally, we read Arthur Clarke's fantasy novel "Fountains of Paradise" in 1979. The novel describes in detail a space elevator for launching into space, operating using the centrifugal force of the earth's rotation.
    And immediately they decided to "cut down" the money. Why - read Clark. He describes in great detail all the complexities of this project.
    1. +4
      12 November 2021 07: 00
      acting using the centrifugal force of the earth's rotation.

      The elevator does not use this force, the elevator rises with the help of its motors along a "rope" fixed in geostationary orbit. Centrifugal force has nothing to do with it, and it will not be able to overcome the gravity of the Earth.
      1. +5
        12 November 2021 07: 14
        Quote: Wedmak
        Centrifugal force has nothing to do with it


        What does it have to do with it. It is she who pulls the cable so that the cart can move on it.
        1. +1
          12 November 2021 14: 21
          Generally speaking, the pull of the cable is the force of the Earth's gravity, that is, gravity. She also holds the point of anchoring the cable to the GSO. Centrifugal force is the apparent force that acts on an object in a direction away from the center of the circle.
          1. +5
            12 November 2021 15: 47
            Generally speaking, the pull of the cable is the force of the Earth's gravity, that is, gravity. She also holds the point of anchoring the cable to the GSO. Centrifugal force is the apparent force that acts on an object in a direction away from the center of the circle.


            Sorry, but this is a school physics course. Yes, your definition of centrifugal force is absolutely correct, but you don't understand how it all works. Let's take your example with a sling. The rope in a free state is soft and you cannot send an elevator along it. There is nothing to rely on. Now, you start to unwind the sling. The rope is pulled - two oppositely directed forces act simultaneously on it - centrifugal, created by the stone, and centripetal, created by your hand. It is the interaction of these forces that stretches the rope. Gravity is not important here. The sling can be twisted at any angle to the surface. And the rope will be taut. In the middle of the rope, you can hang a load and it will not fall. But it is worth stopping the rotation and the load will collapse. This load is the model of the "car" of the elevator.

            The space elevator is supposed to work the same way. One end of the cable is tied to the surface of the Earth (somewhere at the equator). There is simply nothing to tie the other end of the cable to. Therefore, as in the sling, a "stone" is tied, which will stretch the rope. In order for this "rock" to be above one point on the surface and stretch the cable, it must be placed in a geostationary orbit, or a little further. And it will spin in sync with the Earth's surface. If it is closer, the "stone" with a rope will fall to the ground. If a little further, the rope will stretch like a sling rope. Gravity is involved here only in that the diameter of the geostationary orbit is determined by the gravity of the planet.
            1. 0
              12 November 2021 18: 09
              Let me argue, though, that I don’t understand how it works. In this case, gravity plays the role of a rope. Only now, if the "stone" were hanging on the rope due to centrifugal force, the length of the rope would not play a role. No. At least 100 km, at least 30 thousand. Everything would depend on the angular velocity. In space, between objects, there is only one interaction - gravitational (radiation pressure, heating, etc. will now be omitted as insignificant). And it only attracts. The finding of the "stone" at one point above the Earth's surface in the GSO is explained by the same angular velocities of the Earth's rotation in this orbit, that's all. Our planet still attracts the "stone" and the elevator cable will need to be lowered from the stone, and not pulled from the Earth (if centrifugal force was acting). The sling principle doesn't work here.
              The problem of lowering the cable is of course still fun ...
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. +1
                  12 November 2021 20: 21
                  The fact of the matter is that for an elevator, the angular velocity must be fixed. And it should be equal to the angular velocity of the Earth's rotation. This condition is fulfilled ONLY in geostationary orbit.

                  That's right ... that's exactly what I said. Only the force acting on the satellite is not centrifugal, but gravitational. In space, nothing else, in principle, can act at a distance. And what you call centrifugal is the interaction of the planet's gravity and the mass of the satellite.
                  When the angular velocity is equal to the angular velocity of the Earth, the load in a closer orbit will fall to the ground, and in a more distant orbit, the load will leave the Earth if it is not held by a cable. This follows from the formula for the first cosmic velocity.

                  At equal angular velocities, in a closer orbit, the load will leave the Earth, because its relative speed will be greater than necessary. Most likely it will rotate in an ellipse. In a deeper orbit, the payload will approach the Earth until its orbit becomes stable, it will not have enough speed to stay higher. Again, an ellipse, with a period of hundreds, if not thousands of years. The farther the orbit, the greater the speed of the object must be in order to stay on it. Up to the 2nd space, here we are already entering the near-solar orbit. There, in general, it is already necessary to take into account the theory of relativity together with the influence of the nearest planets.
                  I advise you to see how the spacecraft are put into orbit. To raise the orbit, any spacecraft needs to accelerate, for this two impulses are made, the first "lifts" the orbit, the second stabilizes it, so that the spacecraft does not go into an elliptical orbit, with a possible stuck into the Earth.

                  Once again, centrifugal force is apparent force. It is used when there is a calculation of the interaction in non-inertial frames of reference. Only one force acts on a satellite in the GSO (and in any other orbit) - the gravity of the planet. And movement in orbit gives it inertia, i.e. its mass.
                  1. 0
                    12 November 2021 23: 13
                    Only the force acting on the satellite is not centrifugal, but gravitational.

                    Okay, there is no point in arguing further. If you want to understand the issue - here is a link to the Ph.D. thesis of Anna Borisovna Nuralieva at the Institute of Applied Mathematics. M.V. Keldysh RAS "ABOUT THE SPACE ELEVATOR CABLE DYNAMICS".
                    https://keldysh.ru/council/1/nuralieva-diss.pdf

                    There is a history of the issue and specific calculations. Quoting from there (pp. 4-5):
                    "One of such methods, very simple in principle, is to give the lifted load energy and momentum of orbital motion due to the rotation of the Earth. stretch the cable from the Earth behind the geostationary and deliver goods along it, while the body released from the cable will already have an initial speed. Gravitational and centrifugal forces keep the structure taut... A balancing mass is placed at the upper end to keep the structure in balance. it
                    space elevator concept. Despite the fact that the idea is not very new and, in the opinion of many experts, does not have insurmountable obstacles to its implementation, its development is progressing slowly. In the first decade of this century, there is no significant progress either in the original concept
                    design of the CL (2000), many of the shortcomings of which are now visible, nor in the study of dynamics. Therefore, this work, which proposes the development of the modern concept of CR and a fairly detailed study of its dynamics, seems relevant. "

                    (p. 12)
                    "Yu. N. Artsutanov in 1960 wrote an article" Into Space - on an electric locomotive "[3], which was published in" Komsomolskaya Pravda ", where he proposed a cable stretched from the surface of the Earth for geostationaryto move loads into space on it. Artsutanov pointed out that the cable should be extremely strong and of variable width. Later he developed his idea [4,5, XNUMX], presenting it already in popular science journals. Artsutanov's work was not known abroad, but the idea was apparently in the air. "

                    Further, the whole history of the development of the idea and specific calculations.
            2. 0
              12 November 2021 22: 45
              If a little further, the rope will stretch like a sling rope.

              If the cable is replaced with a chain and new links are hooked up, then the efficiency of the engine increases as the load moves away from the surface of the Earth. And energy comes from the rotation of the planet. Just don't tell Greta that the Earth can be stopped.
      2. +4
        12 November 2021 09: 50
        Centrifugal force has nothing to do with it, and it will not be able to overcome the gravity of the Earth.

        The centrifugal force of rotation of the earth "according to Clark" pulls the "cable" along which the carts with the load move. So the centrifugal force is very much to do with it.
    2. +2
      12 November 2021 11: 41
      Arthur Clarke took the idea of ​​a space elevator from Soviet engineer Yuri Artsunatov, which he described in 1960.
      1. +1
        12 November 2021 11: 55
        More precisely, Artsutangova. Clark acknowledged Artsutanov's authorship.
        1. 0
          12 November 2021 12: 31
          "More precisely, Artsutanova." Sori, wrong. drinks
        2. +1
          12 November 2021 16: 25
          And this is how Andrei Platonov represented it in the story "Moonlight bean" in 1926

          platonov
          1. +1
            13 November 2021 11: 20
            More precisely, Lunar boмba wassat
            1. +2
              13 November 2021 23: 08
              Yeah м lagged behind
            2. +1
              14 November 2021 11: 17
              Quote: Outsider V.
              More precisely, Lunar boмba wassat

              hi Greetings to all! I liked the article.
              I read the moon bomb. Yeah, Kreutzkopf is a nasty guy.
              And in my opinion, the most original way to reach the Moon was invented by Cyrano de Bergerac. Well, and also the heroine of the novel "Operation Moon" by Paul Anderson. There, a witch flew to the moon on a broomstick! Only she was mistaken, and instead of the Moon, her broom flew to an asteroid from the Kuiper Belt. I came to my senses on the approach to Neptune ...
              1. +1
                14 November 2021 11: 24
                Let's add "The First Men on the Moon" by H. Wells and, of course, "Dunno on the Moon" by N. Nosov.
                1. +1
                  14 November 2021 11: 38
                  Quote: Outsider V.
                  Let's add "The First Men on the Moon" by H. Wells and, of course, "Dunno on the Moon" by N. Nosov.

                  "Dunno on the Moon" is a good thing! Shows the ulcers of the bourgeois system.
                  And "The First People on the Moon" is super! The description of an ideal society, however, is too peaceful.
                  And sometimes I watch online an old Soviet cartoon on this topic. (True, I forgot the name). There, due to a misunderstanding, a schoolboy, a pioneer, got on a space rocket and, accordingly, on the moon. And just as accidentally discovered the missing First Expedition. good
                  1. +1
                    14 November 2021 14: 10
                    The Soviet cartoon about the pioneer was called "Flight to the Moon", 1953. But he had a predecessor in 1935 - the full-length film Space Voyage. In both films, there was a pioneer in the carriage, and they steered towards the moon with the help of a large steering wheel.

                    And one cannot but recall the film "Journey to the Moon" by Georges Méliès in 1902 (!). However, this is more of a parody.
                    1. 0
                      14 November 2021 14: 47
                      Quote: Outsider V.
                      The Soviet cartoon about the pioneer was called "Flight to the Moon", 1953. But he had a predecessor in 1935 - the full-length film Space Voyage. In both films, there was a pioneer in the carriage, and they steered towards the moon with the help of a large steering wheel.

                      And one cannot but recall the film "Journey to the Moon" by Georges Méliès in 1902 (!). However, this is more of a parody.

                      You know, somehow you can't remember right away ...
                      Space voyage, isn't this the movie where the rabbit and the cat appeared, and where the frozen oxygen was found on the moon ???
                      And Méliès's film, isn't it the one where the main character killed am devils umbrella ??? I will try to watch the films you listed! good
                      1. +1
                        14 November 2021 14: 59
                        I don’t remember a rabbit or a cat, but I found a scene of steering to the moon with the steering wheel (or is it thrust control?): Https://youtu.be/SHKviXaXZZ4?t=2082.

                        You were right about the umbrella and the devils: https://youtu.be/XZpgpr-P2C4?t=550. am
                      2. 0
                        14 November 2021 17: 36
                        ... about the umbrella and ..

                        laughing I watched for a long time, I'll try to see it tomorrow. Thank you.
  5. +3
    12 November 2021 06: 48
    In the 30s, a machine gun was tested on a similar principle. Did not go. Those. the bullets were round steel balls, the barrel is naturally smooth, so there was no accuracy.
    And the idea seems to be nothing too. What is the saving of metal due to the absence of casings, the absence of gunpowder, one might say an environmentally friendly weapon. The truth is quite cumbersome.
    1. +3
      12 November 2021 09: 50
      Quote: YOUR
      And the idea seems to be nothing too. What is the saving of metal due to the absence of casings, the absence of gunpowder, one might say an environmentally friendly weapon.

      A good overview of the implementations of this idea
      https://topwar.ru/2365-metateli-pul.html

      The first cannon based on this principle appeared in Russia in 1908. laughing
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. 0
    12 November 2021 08: 02
    I wonder if the centrifuge is physically implemented?
    A magnetic suspension and acceleration by a linear electric motor suggests itself.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +8
    12 November 2021 09: 28
    At least I see several colossal technical problems:
    1) Centripetal acceleration from 20 to 33 thousand g, with a radius of 25 and 15 m, respectively. Like an artillery piece. Moreover, the load on the projectile is not axial, but transverse, which the structures of the cylinder-ogival aerodynamic shape can withstand much worse. That is, this is an increase in the mass of the rocket hull structures. For comparison, conventional launch vehicles must withstand only 5-10 g in the axial direction, and a high-explosive projectile, not designed for fragmentation, has a body mass designed for such, and also longitudinal, accelerations of 50-60% of the total.
    2) Hooking and releasing the projectile. A rocket with a payload of 180kg, to reach the first spacecraft from 2200m / s, will have a mass of at least 2 tons. With the above accelerations, this means a load on the hook from 40000 to 66000 tf. Taking into account the safety margin, the aircraft carrier can be suspended. And it also has to work with millisecond precision.
    3) Load on the bearing. Its design does not matter, even though the brass bushing ( wassat ), although magnetic levitating, but it will need to perceive the imbalance of the rotor after separation of the projectile, and the loads there will also be appropriate - thousands of tons. Consider the recoil when fired with a two-ton projectile with an initial speed of 2200 m / s, but without the possibility of rolling back the "barrel"
    4) Acceleration must withstand not only the body, payload and electronics of the rocket, but also its engines. When using a solid-propellant engine, this will require completely new approaches to the design of fuel sticks, such as channel placement perpendicular to the engine axis, or the implementation of purely end combustion of the stick. And in the case of liquid-propellant rocket engines, its layout and design of units designed for lateral acceleration of 20-33 thousand g, which is also not even a problem, but a problem.
    1. -4
      12 November 2021 10: 30
      Was an eyewitness when in a centrifuge 20 g the rotor with the tested products scattered due to imbalance. Everything is fine powder.
      There is no point in even talking about the overloads that the launched object must withstand.
      The American project is an excellent "chainsaw" to "saw" many, many green pieces of paper.
      1. +4
        12 November 2021 10: 41
        Quote: prior
        Was an eyewitness when a rotor flew in a 20 g centrifuge

        Have you seen a movie about exploding rockets?
        [
      2. +2
        12 November 2021 11: 43
        Yes, they will cut their own money - this is a private office and private money.
        1. -4
          12 November 2021 11: 48
          Many American firms are private, and the money is sawing quite budgetary, for example, for defense needs.
          PR today - money tomorrow.
    2. +5
      12 November 2021 12: 04
      All these problems regarding solid-propellant electronic checkers withstanding large overloads of 40000g have long been solved in guided artillery shells and the material of this kinetic rocket is much stronger than that of conventional rockets, in fact, this rocket is the same artillery active rocket projectile only of large dimensions and the hook is most likely made of a tungsten alloy magnetically axial holding of the rocket from the side; the magnet holds the rocket in the tail; it holds the support. The bearing is most likely the same unusual magnetic filled with a special hydraulic fluid to soften the loads at the time of separation of the kinetic rocket. And yes, a rocket for several kilometers with the help of such a system has already been launched.
    3. +1
      12 November 2021 21: 25
      Quote: Max PV
      Moreover, the load on the projectile is not axial, but transverse, which the structures of the cylinder-ogival aerodynamic shape can withstand much worse. That is, this is an increase in the mass of the rocket hull structures.

      Generally speaking, you can accelerate the projectile in any position that is convenient for this. And deploy at the moment of the throw, when the acceleration is zero.
  10. +3
    12 November 2021 10: 31
    Not so long ago, I remember, opinions on the impossibility of a kinetic launch were heard at VO. So, the road will be mastered by the walking one, if they succeed, we also need it!
  11. 0
    12 November 2021 11: 03
    It is strange that the article did not mention military application of technology:
    https://twitter.com/Robotbeat/status/1458466630888050692
    A little quicker, and this thing will make a decent weapon. Can carry out partial orbital bombardment from the continental United States at a cost-effective ratio, similar to firing cruise missiles from the Aegis cruiser close to the target. Similar time from launch to impact.
    1. -1
      12 November 2021 12: 07
      In this regard, artillery guns are more suitable for firing missiles - shells that, with the help of deployable aerodynamic rudders, will be able to glide in the upper layers of the atmosphere.
      1. 0
        12 November 2021 12: 10
        so this is exactly the artillery piece! It just looks extremely unusual and the principle of operation is different. But PN typical for artillery suits very well for SpinLaunch, not afraid of 10.000G
  12. -2
    12 November 2021 11: 05
    Yes, you sho! Why ... a rubber slingshot is no longer Fenshi? (I once heard that the Chinese launched "something" into space with a big ... very large slingshot!) And the Clarke lift? Forgotten too? request
  13. -3
    12 November 2021 11: 49
    2 km / s is far from the first space mission, and launching space rockets from an air platform has long been mastered. In this case, there are no difficulties either with overheating or with existing overloads. With such a total weight in space, only a few kilos of cubesat can be taken out, and then most of the weight will be on thermal protection and a reinforced structure. In general, the idea is not viable for developed countries. If only the Ukrainians pick up.
    1. 0
      12 November 2021 12: 12
      Specifically, what is in the article is a prototype. For testing and demonstrating technologies, without the task of reaching orbital speeds on it. The next project is ready for it, but it is not being built yet.
  14. 0
    12 November 2021 13: 20
    There is such a method of waging an economic war. Start demonstratively toil with foolishness and thereby force the enemy to toil with this foolishness too. It is necessary to have the appearance of great work and the creation of something worthwhile and, most importantly, very promising. As soon as the enemy gets bogged down in this garbage, calmly close the project. And let him suffer and be amazed. This is how the Americans killed the Soviet cosmonautics, forcing them to first climb into the lunar, and then into the shuttle race. Clearly beyond our economic capabilities. As a result, with a colossal exertion of forces, ours created masterpieces of science and technology that were not needed by anyone: Н1 and Energy-Buran. And the end of the Soviet cosmonautics came. As well as the USSR itself.
    1. 0
      12 November 2021 17: 48
      This topic does not apply to this development here, a private office with specific intentions to create an economical system for launching mini satellites and make money on it. In general, the idea is quite promising for this segment of the space load.
      1. -4
        12 November 2021 22: 48
        Yes, everything will burn to the kuyam.
        above in the comments wrote about the tungsten cladding.
        sawing money.
        drank like electromagnetic guns, Artemis and so on
        1. 0
          13 November 2021 02: 08
          Will not burn the rocket will be coated with either graphite or tantalum carbide or heat-resistant ceramics.
          1. 0
            14 November 2021 07: 40
            melting / boiling point of tungsten - 3400/5500, graphite -3800/4200, tantalum -3000/5500.
            if tungsten burns, everything else burns.
  15. 0
    12 November 2021 18: 20
    I read the article, I was dizzy, nauseated. I don’t remember this carousel.
  16. +2
    12 November 2021 21: 31
    Simple but tasteful! The author is great! I found an interesting and very non-standard material. A visual reminder, you do not need to blink and run into one single way to solve the problem! There are always unexpected workarounds.

    By the way, I was the only one who remembered Jules Verne and his "From the Cannon to the Moon"? good
  17. -1
    13 November 2021 09: 54
    Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi
    An unusual approach

    Well, yes.
    If you look at the history of throwing weapons, the sling was invented before the bow. Well what can I say. started with the theory of jet propulsion, finish with slingshots? The degradation of civilization is evident.
    You shouldn't have laughed at Rogozin when he mentioned trampolines. Why don't we laugh at this sling? This is an ordinary sling. Well technologically advanced, but a sling.
    1. +1
      13 November 2021 16: 24
      This method of launching a payload is cheaper than a conventional rocket, this is its plus, and no matter what kind of technology there is another office wants to launch vehicles with a payload using an electromagnetic springboard.
  18. 0
    17 November 2021 22: 42
    Quote: AKuzenka
    according to the Jules Verne principle

    It seems like they built one in Iraq under Hussein, but they brought "democracy" there and they don't think about any space anymore in that country.
  19. 0
    14 December 2021 14: 18
    An interesting idea, but, unfortunately, clearly utopian. If only because at the declared speed of the satellite exit from the installation of 2200 m / s, the satellite itself by the end of the acceleration will experience colossal loads. Electronics are unlikely to withstand this. The exact numbers cannot yet be named due to, in fact, the lack of input data, but at least approximately:
    The final linear speed inside the centrifuge is 2000 m / s (the declared speed is 2200 m / s, we make a discount)
    The diameter of the installation and the ring itself, where the rocket accelerates, is 100 meters (quite feasible, as for me), the radius is 50 meters.
    So, according to the formula known to us in school, the centrifugal acceleration of a body is equal to its linear velocity squared, divided by the radius of the circle along which the body moves. Substitute numbers into it and we get crazy 80000 m \ s ^ 2, or ~ 8150 g. How much is the general standard of permissible loads for unmanned flights, up to 10 g? To keep within it, without reducing the speed, it is necessary to expand the radius of the ring to 40 km. And do not forget that this is only a quarter of the minimum delta for launching into orbit, not even counting the loss in the atmosphere. The most elementary school physics opposes this method of launching satellites into orbit.
    No, the future belongs only to the many kilometers of electromagnetic accelerators-railguns.
    1. 0
      27 December 2021 18: 33
      Quote: Pavel73
      There is such a method of waging an economic war. Start demonstratively toil with foolishness and thereby force the enemy to toil with this foolishness too

      I completely agree with you, this is nonsense and primitive is designed for monkeys that they will imitate. Even if you dig an inclined tunnel at an angle of 45 * to a depth of 1 km and a length of 1.42 km, pump out the air from it and then disperse it according to the principle of the Gauss cannon, or build a similar tunnel along the slope of the mountain (where to find such a mountain with a long, even slope at the desired angle in the desired direction) and the power of several CHP plants will not be enough for the peak load .. special energy storage units will be required .... is it not easier to improve conventional missiles