Hypersonic complex or spacecraft. New details of tests in China

10
Hypersonic complex or spacecraft. New details of tests in China
The Changzheng-2C launch vehicle is the alleged carrier of the Chinese hypersonic weapons... Photo CALT

In parallel with other leading powers, China is developing hypersonic weapons. A few days ago it became known that one of the samples of this kind, with special capabilities, was brought to flight tests. New information soon arrived. Now the foreign press reports on several test launches in the past months. At the same time, China denies testing weapons and talks about a peace program.

News and denial


The first to report on the hypersonic tests on October 16 was the American newspaper Financial Times. She learned of these events from several unnamed individuals associated with the US intelligence community. Information from these sources as a whole formed an approximate picture, but they interpreted the information received in different ways.



According to the FT and its sources, at the end of August, China launched the Changzheng-2C launch vehicle with an experienced hypersonic aircraft on board. The prototype ascended to a predetermined altitude outside the atmosphere, circled the Earth, and then headed towards its designated target. It was not possible to hit her - the device missed by 20 miles.

In the wake of the publication in FT, new materials began to appear on specialized resources. In particular, several videos were published in Chinese social networks, allegedly with the flight of an unknown device. They showed how, against the background of the dark evening sky, a bright trail is formed from a certain high-speed object. It is curious that one of these videos was dated at the beginning of September, which does not correspond to foreign data on the test date.


The flight of an unknown device in early September. Frame from video from Weibo / ChDambiev

At first, the official Beijing remained silent and did not comment on foreign news... But on October 18, the first official statement was made. Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian confirmed during a press conference that new technology was indeed tested in August. However, it was not a rocket, but a spaceship. It is built with new technology needed to reduce the cost of space travel. The Foreign Ministry spokesman did not give any details.

According to new data


Meanwhile, the Financial Times contacted other "knowledgeable sources" and received even more interesting information. It was published on October 20 in the article "China conducted two hypersonic weapons tests this summer."

China has reportedly tested new hypersonic missile systems twice this summer. The first test launch took place on July 27, and not in August, as stated in a previous publication. It was an experimental Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) capable of carrying nuclear weapons. The news of this test allegedly made a strong impression on the US military and political leadership.

The second launch took place on 13 August. Details of this event are unknown. FT sources do not know its class, type and characteristics. It could be the same complex that was tested in July - or a completely different system, incl. a different class.


Visualization of the flight of a hypersonic warhead from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

No official comments have yet been received from the Chinese Foreign Ministry or the Chinese Defense Ministry on this matter. This topic can be raised at the next press conferences. It is highly likely that officials will again deny reports of weapons testing and talk about a scientific and civilian project.

In addition, the latest news does not in any way clarify the situation with the videos, allegedly filmed in early September. According to all reports of the Financial Times and statements by a foreign ministry spokesman, tests of new equipment took place in July and August - but not in the first days of autumn. There may have been other tests in the recent past that have not yet made it into the news.

Two versions


Recent reports do not add up to a single consistent picture. The foreign press and the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs agree only that a certain launch actually took place in August, and a prototype of a new class was present on board the launch vehicle. The rest of the news and official statements contradict each other.

It can be noted that both versions, the Chinese American, do not generally contradict the known information about the promising developments of China. However, it will not be possible to establish which of them is more true due to the lack of information and Beijing's unwillingness to share details.


The layout of the reusable spaceplane "Shenlong" is being tested. Photo Bmpd.livejournal.com

It is well known that Chinese science and industry has been studying hypersonic technology for many years. As a result, the appearance of an experimental aircraft and the beginning of its flight tests were only a matter of time. All this can indirectly confirm the latest reports from the FT.

It is curious that now the American newspaper writes about two tests, and we can talk about hypersonic complexes of different types. Such messages do not in principle contradict the available information on ongoing developments. It is quite possible that China is simultaneously working on several directions in the hypersonic region. For example, a FOBS class complex and a system with a planning warhead could be put into testing.

However, one should not forget the statements of the Foreign Ministry, which also look realistic. It is argued that a certain spacecraft was tested on the basis of new technologies that reduce the cost of the flight. Obviously, we are talking about a promising reusable system - and this explanation of the recent launches also has a right to life.

In recent years, the Chinese rocket and space industry has been focusing on reusable ships and is already showing its first successes. So, in September last year, the first flight of the apparatus known as CSSHQ took place. For two days, he remained in orbit, after which he landed. No technical details were disclosed; the second flight of the reusable system has not yet been reported.


Launch of the Changzheng-2F rocket. Photo by Xinhua

It should be noted that the launch of CSSHQ was carried out using the Changzheng-2F launch vehicle, and the alleged ship mod. 2021 flew on a Changzheng-2C rocket. These carriers belong to the same family, but the CZ-2F is significantly larger and heavier, and also carries a greater load. From this it follows that the ship that flew in August is smaller and lighter than last year's CSSHQ, as a result of which it received a lighter rocket.

In all directions


Thus, the news of recent days clearly indicates that China is testing promising missile technology. At the same time, they do not allow us to understand what kind of samples are being discussed. Unofficial foreign sources report military developments and give some details - while Beijing talks about the scientific nature of the project, but does not go into details.

However, some details of the current situation and the current state of affairs are clear and understandable. It is obvious that China is not concentrating efforts in one area and seeks to simultaneously develop several directions. Hypersonic and rocket-space systems for various purposes are being developed, and now these projects are being tested.

All this means that in the medium term, China will receive a whole range of new military and civilian capabilities. The army will be armed with rocket and space complexes with fundamentally different capabilities, and civilian astronautics will master fundamentally new ships. When this will happen is unknown. But all the necessary efforts will be made, and this will definitely happen. And then China will not make a secret of its achievements.
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  2. -3
    25 October 2021 06: 26
    Only we and the PRC have hypersonic missiles, the United States is 2-4 years behind. During this time, we have been "riveting" so much that the United States will become sick at consultations on negotiations on hyper-missiles.
    1. 0
      25 October 2021 07: 16
      As well as the SU-57 as many as 76 units until 2027. laughing
      1. -1
        25 October 2021 07: 22
        Yes, they lagged behind, but in hyper they were ahead, and this is worse than flying stealth.
        1. +3
          25 October 2021 08: 14
          The main idea is not that we have few planes, but that our economies are incomparable, not in our favor
          1. +3
            25 October 2021 08: 22
            They did not forget that the United States has a population of 300 million, and the fact that our military-industrial complex production is several times cheaper. They develop new weapons mainly at the expense of the companies' own funds, and in our country at the expense of the closed part of the budget. If we compare incomes, then our army should be 12 times smaller than the American one in all respects.
            1. +3
              25 October 2021 12: 10
              Quote: tralflot1832
              Do not forget that the US has a population of 300 million

              have not forgotten.
              In the United States, only from 2009 to 2016. manufacturing sector increased by 20%... As a result of the growth of this industry sector, one can note the emergence of 900 thousand new jobs in the period from 2008 to 2016, of which 80 thousand jobs were created as a result of direct return from abroad.
              In terms of GDP, the United States in 2019 retained a stable first place with a volume of 21,5 trillion. dollars (23,6% of world GDP)
              Quote: tralflot1832
              the fact that our production of the military-industrial complex is several times cheaper.

              it is not true.
              We have less wages per worker, but their workers are an order of magnitude less than 9 labor productivity)
              But their management gets less of our "effective"
              They steal from us at times more.
              Energy consumption:
              1.We have 13 months of winter in most of the country, and they have 13 months of summer
              we need to heat workshops, houses, kindergartens, transport, etc., etc. from -15g to 20g C = delta 35 degrees
              they need to be cooled from +40 degrees Celsius to 20 degrees = delta 20 degrees
              if it's stupid then 50% less energy consumption by 1 degree
              2. The air conditioner (taheplovaya machine) is three (or even 5) times more efficient than the air heater.
              1 + 2 they have at least 15m0% cheaper to maintain infrastructure
              3. Logistics: With almost a square, two okyans, a developed fleet, the road network cannot be compared with ours. We are losing at times here
              4. If they need a bolt, a chip, a paper clip: they do not need to engage in "import substitution" there are 480 million more NATO (EEC) residents who will provide them with this. Or Israel
              5 ideas and brains
              as of 2019, the United States accounted for about 50% of all awarded Nobel Prizes in science and 40% of all Nobel Prize winners (300 and 383, respectively). Following them in this indicator, Great Britain, Germany and France are noticeably lagging behind - the corresponding indicators for the number of laureates they have - 132, 108 and 68 scientists. Russia (together with the pre-revolutionary and Soviet Union) - 31 laureates (sixth place)

              Quote: tralflot1832
              They develop new weapons mainly at the expense of the companies' own funds, and in our country at the expense of the closed part of the budget.

              "at the expense of their own" is, on the contrary, a bold "+" they want a return on the dollar laid out of their pocket.
              in 2018, the United States accounted for 25,2% of all global investment in science. Absolute US R&D Expenditures amounted to $ 553 billion, ahead of all other leading countries (China - 475 billion dollars, Japan - 187 billion, Germany - 117 billion, South Korea - 88 billion, India - 83 billion, France - 63 billion, Russia - 59 billion., UK - 50 billion, Brazil - 37 billion)
        2. 0
          25 October 2021 17: 57
          what is scarier?
          takes up more space, flies closer, warheads are smaller, maneuvers worse, radar is more visible.
    2. 0
      25 October 2021 10: 13
      So far, only Russia is in service with hypersonic missiles. The Chinese are more likely to have a planning hypersonic apparatus, an analogue of the Avangard.
      1. 0
        25 October 2021 18: 03
        any ballistic missile is hypersonic. starting with v-1.
        If we take not ballistic ones, it seems that the Indians have brahmos? if from another opera, the amerikosov sm-6 with a booster from sm-2, which was put into service 10 years ago, is also hypersonic.
  3. +1
    25 October 2021 20: 14
    It's easy to find out. If launched from a rubber band, it is a spaceship that was stolen from Russia. If from the launch pad it is a hypersonic missile, which was also stolen from Russia. And if from a trampoline, then a compatible supersonic spacecraft with motors from a supersonic rocket, which were also stolen in Russia through Ukraine.