Hypersonic Lockheed Martin SR-72: the problem of technologies and solutions

55

Lockheed Martin hypersonic aircraft concept

According to various reports and sources, since the end of the 72s, Lockheed Martin, through its special Skunk Works division, has been developing a promising hypersonic aircraft. The machine, known as the SR-XNUMX, will be able to show the highest flight performance and solve special combat missions. Very little is known about this project, if it is indeed being developed. However, it is clear that the most modern and promising technologies and components will be needed to solve the set tasks.

Secret hypersound


The first mentions of the SR-72 project date back to 2007, and then it was reported that development had been going on for several years. Subsequently, new publications of an unclear degree of reliability about the goals and technologies of the project, as well as the timing of its implementation, repeatedly appeared in specialized publications. Until a certain time, there was no official information.



However, the statements of representatives of "Lockheed-Martin" did not clarify the situation. So, for a long time, it has been repeatedly mentioned that the company is conducting research into hypersonic technologies. In mid-2017, the media reported on the first flight tests, but then the development company indicated that such an aircraft could only be created in the early twenties.

Already in February 2018, information about plans to create the SR-72 was denied. At the time, it was argued that key technologies remain immature, and the development of the aircraft is impractical. However, in November of the same year, information from a source in Lockheed Martin appeared in foreign media, according to which the first flight of the SR-72 could take place until 2025. At the same time, they reported about the possibility of using the new aircraft as an interceptor armed with hypersonic air-to-air missiles ".

Hypersonic Lockheed Martin SR-72: the problem of technologies and solutions

Concept revealed in one of the Pentagon reports

According to open publications, the SR-72 will be able to reach speeds of the order of 6M. High speed will ensure its combat stability, and therefore less attention will be paid to the glider stealth issues. Special engines are being developed for hypersonic flight. The aircraft can be unmanned or optionally manned.

The resulting SR-72 can be used as a high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft, well protected from the interception of modern air defense, or as an interceptor capable of quickly reaching the line of use of weapons. Impact functions are also not excluded. At the same time, combat modifications will be able to carry hypersonic weapons for various purposes.

New stealth


The SR-72 aircraft, capable of speeds up to M = 6, needs a special glider. It must accommodate all the necessary components and assemblies, the crew (optional) and the payload. In this case, the aerodynamic appearance must meet the requirements of hypersonic flight, and the structure must withstand the arising mechanical and thermal loads.

A glider that meets all these requirements will have to be created from scratch, although the design will be based on existing research and developments. The airframe can be made of heat-resistant steel alloys, titanium and other metals with the desired combination of strength and durability. It is also possible to use modern and advanced composites, ceramics, etc. The stability of the structure should be increased by cooling systems for surfaces and units experiencing high thermal loads.


One of the versions of the SR-72's appearance and the design of its power plant. Graphics Thedrive.com

In recent years, a large scientific work has been carried out in the United States to find the optimal options for the aerodynamic appearance of hypersonic aircraft. Obviously, the results of these studies are used in the hypothetical SR-72 project. Thus, the future aircraft may outwardly resemble some of the previous missiles.

Perhaps the exterior of the SR-72 will be formed by smooth or smoothly curved surfaces and clear edges. The aircraft can have a swept or delta wing, and the fuselage will have to receive bucket air intakes with a wedge. For obvious reasons, the entire payload, regardless of the tasks being solved, will be transported inside the fuselage.

It is clear that a glider of this kind will not be inconspicuous in the usual sense. In addition, in flight at hypersonic speed, the aircraft will unmask itself. However, this is said to be not a problem. Hypersonic flight in itself will become the main defense method. Intercepting a maneuvering target at 6M speed is at least extremely difficult - if not impossible with current or future technology.

Engine issue


A separate problem in the SR-72 project is the creation of a power plant. The characteristics of turbojet engines are insufficient for hypersonic flight, and ramjets require initial acceleration means. The use of rocket engines for various purposes is impractical. In this regard, it is necessary to develop a fundamentally new propulsion system.

It should be recalled that the SR-71 reconnaissance aircraft at one time used Pratt & Whitney J58-P4 engines with turbojet and direct-flow circuits. At speeds up to 1,6M, the main part of the thrust was created by the turbojet part, and further acceleration was carried out using the direct-flow one. At the same time, the engines were extremely complex and expensive, and also needed a special grade of fuel, special lubricants, etc.


Reconnaissance SR-71A landing. Photo by NASA

Since the mid-58s, Lockheed Martin and Aerojet Rocketdyne have been working on a promising J4-PXNUMX combined cycle engine. It included a direct-flow circuit capable of providing hypersonic flight. The profile press reported successful design and some testing, but the finished engine has not yet been presented. This fact can indicate both the lack of significant success and the unwillingness to disclose a breakthrough project ahead of time.

Equipment and armament


The manned or unmanned version of the SR-72 needs advanced electronic equipment for various purposes. First of all, it is necessary to ensure effective flight control at all speed modes, regardless of the presence of a pilot. Automation must monitor flight parameters and respond in a timely manner to dangerous changes. In particular, she will have to prevent overly energetic maneuvers and the occurrence of unacceptable overloads.

Special requirements apply to unmanned vehicles. During hypersonic flight, radio communication with the operator is practically impossible, and the autopilot must be able to independently fly the aircraft and solve the assigned tasks in the most critical modes.

The publications on the topic mention the use of the SR-72 as a reconnaissance agent. However, optical reconnaissance by aircraft forces at present and in the future does not seem appropriate. In addition, it is unclear how aerial cameras can take pictures through the plasma "envelope" around the aircraft. The presence of plasma virtually excludes electronic reconnaissance.

Application as a fighter or missile carrier looks more reasonable, although it leaves some questions. First of all, it is a drop in combat load. Launching a missile from an internal compartment at a supersonic or hypersonic speed is a very complex engineering task, on the solution of which the very possibility of the aircraft's combat use depends. In turn, braking to acceptable speeds before dropping negates the advantages of hypersonic flight.


Motorcycle nacelle SR-71. The movable cone was responsible for the distribution of air between the two circuits of the J58-P4 engine. Photo Wikimedia Commons

Uncertain Future


Thanks to research in recent decades, the United States has accumulated a certain amount of experience in the field of hypersonic technology. Right now, it is being implemented in projects for guided missiles and warheads for various purposes. In addition, according to various reports, the issue of creating a full-fledged aircraft on this basis is being worked out. However, missiles and warheads are already on display in open materials, while the aircraft design remains secret - if it exists at all.

It is easy to see that Lockheed-Martin and related enterprises have technologies, materials and ideas for solving part of the tasks within the framework of the proposed SR-72 project. At the same time, other questions of no less importance remain unanswered. Perhaps such solutions already exist, but they are not disclosed for reasons of secrecy. However, there may be another explanation associated with the lack of the necessary technologies.

Whether the Pentagon is supporting the SR-72 is unknown. Obviously, the multipurpose hypersonic aircraft is of great interest to the Air Force. However, the real combat capabilities and promising prospects of such a machine remain uncertain, as well as the feasibility of supporting the project.

Thus, the US hypersonic program in recent years has reached the stage of developing military systems, but so far it can show only limited results. Warheads and missiles of a new class have been created and are being tested, while a hypersonic aircraft, at its best, has not yet left the stage of designing and testing individual components. Whether Lockheed Martin and other organizations will be able to find all the necessary technology and build the expected SR-72 - time will tell.
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -7
    1 October 2021 18: 11
    everyone has been talking about this old record about supersonic airplanes for 25 years, but there is no airplane. the dreamers
    1. 0
      1 October 2021 22: 59
      Achieving such speeds on airplanes flying through the atmosphere requires a revolution in materials science! And she's not there yet, there is nothing to talk about! An airplane is not a disposable rocket, it must have some kind of resource. So far we have rested in 3-3,5M. Titanium is also not a panacea - hypersound in the atmosphere will not survive. We are waiting for the appearance of new refractory materials with the required characteristics and cost.
      1. +4
        2 October 2021 02: 52
        Quote: Timon2155
        Achieving such speeds on airplanes flying through the atmosphere requires a revolution in materials science!
        Yes, to hell with it, with speed, combat use is interesting ... in my humble opinion, this is a dead-end direction, at 5-6 max what can be used?
        1. +1
          2 October 2021 11: 10
          Zircon flies wonderfully in an atmosphere with
          speed as much as 7 MAX belay
          Why can't an American get 5 MAX?
          1. +3
            3 October 2021 00: 13
            Have you been informed about Zircon's flight profile? Is it exactly in the atmosphere? And at what altitude in the atmosphere? If the earth is one thing, in the upper layers at the border of space is another.
            1. 0
              3 October 2021 01: 05
              "If the earth is one thing, in the upper layers at the border of space is another" ///
              ----
              At the border of space, cruise missiles cannot fly. No lift.
              And there is no oxygen to power the ramjet engine.
              Iskander-type ballistic missiles fly there.
              So the Zircon is not a cruise missile?
              1. +2
                3 October 2021 01: 35
                Why are you snatching only part of my answer and commenting on it? I have given you the possible flight altitudes hidden under the broad concept of "atmosphere". The flight profile can be different: start from the surface, climb 50-70 km to the ceiling (is it close or far to space? A rhetorical question) and then dive or low-altitude flight. What is wrong? Why, in your opinion, a ramjet engine cannot operate at altitudes, for example, 70 km? But science says that ramjet engines work there. Whom to believe?
          2. 0
            3 October 2021 22: 51
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Zircon flies wonderfully in an atmosphere with
            speed as much as 7 MAX belay
            Why can't an American get 5 MAX?

            Because the Zircon is a small disposable rocket, and the "American" is not a small (optional crew) aircraft. wink
          3. 0
            4 December 2021 15: 46
            Zircons and other rockets are not returned back for landing.
        2. 0
          3 October 2021 00: 14
          There would be speed, how to use it, they will find a way.
          1. +2
            3 October 2021 09: 23
            Building speed is as easy as shelling pears. smile
            A solid-propellant booster will accelerate any vehicle / rocket to hypersound at an altitude of 20-50 km.
            The problem is to maintain this speed in level flight in the atmosphere.
            And not to burn out at the terminal site when descending into the dense layers of the atmosphere.
            And yet - the most important thing! - for the GOS to work with such overheating of the apparatus.
            1. 0
              3 October 2021 10: 12
              So that's what I'm writing about. Do not burn = materials are needed that can withstand such a regime for a long time. There will be such a problem will be solved. According to the GOS, there are stationary targets, external target designation. Not a cake, but for the first time it will do.
      2. +2
        2 October 2021 16: 29
        Quote: Timon2155
        Achieving such speeds on airplanes flying through the atmosphere requires a revolution in materials science! And she's not there yet, there is nothing to talk about!

        ========
        Timur! As a person who has been dealing with exactly questions for more than a quarter of a century materials science, in your place - I would not be so categorical!
        Believe me - there are such materials! Suffice it to recall the Shuttles and Buran!
        For a long time, there have been both "ceramics" and "carbon fibers" and "fiberglass" possessing both incredible heat resistance and equally incredibly low thermal conductivity! They are! And for a long time!
        The problem is different: such materials are very difficult to manufacture and extremely expensive, and therefore - an aircraft equipped with such a "skin" (and it must be "composite" - that is, multi-layer!) Will cost, not even tens of millions $, and at least an order of magnitude more expensive! Those. - the cost of such a reconnaissance UAV may be close to the cost of an AIRCRAFT CARRIER!
        1. +1
          3 October 2021 00: 06
          Have you read my post carefully? There is just about the cost at the very end. Do you really think America was discovered by Buran and the Shuttle? So you can jokingly suggest making an airplane out of tungsten, they say, there are materials that were invented a long time ago)))) You yourself understand, this is stupidity. We need not just new materials, but also that they are inexpensive (relatively, of course), more or less reliable (ceramics, there were cases, peeled off, cracked, not very reliable), technological for production, had the required resource, etc. Otherwise it can not be! And then they would have made a 6M interceptor long ago, for example. Or a scout. So, you are somewhat wrong. How else to explain that there are no such planes yet !? And yes, the comparison with the shuttle is incorrect: the shuttle experiences a rather short-term effect of high temperatures when braking in the atmosphere. The plane, on the other hand, must fly at speeds of ~ 6M for a fairly long time.
      3. 0
        2 October 2021 19: 42
        Quote: Timon2155
        Achieving such speeds on airplanes flying through the atmosphere requires a revolution in materials science!
        Or fuel cooling
        1. 0
          3 October 2021 00: 07
          The specific heat of the fuel is finite. To cool the structure on 6M, its heat capacity is not enough.
          1. 0
            3 October 2021 15: 47
            Enough for 6M
            another way to reduce airframe heating by using a magnetic field
      4. 0
        3 October 2021 15: 37
        Heat-resistant materials are complete - and technical solutions for cooling the most heat-loaded surfaces are available fuel circuits with circulation of a mini-nozzle with the supply of argon or helium to the heated surfaces.
        1. 0
          4 October 2021 00: 27
          Listen to you, everything is invented and available. Only now the designers cannot make such an airplane yet. It turns out that something is missing. Theory is a good thing, in practice everything is not so simple.
          1. 0
            4 October 2021 18: 53
            Everything, as always, depends on money, and hypersound with a man on board was created back in the early 60s of the last century X 15, no matter how more than 7200 km per hour, it was dispersed in 2004, the X 43 glider with a scramjet engine began to be tested, the third flight set a speed record of 11 850 km / h the problem remained only with sustainable management in Russia, it seems to have already been solved, and then TsAGI and the project of a hypersonic airliner rolled out for joint work with the EU and Australia
            in 10 years, such aircraft will be realized in metal, including the SR 72.
            1. 0
              4 October 2021 22: 05
              You are killing me with your knowledge))) Have you seen the photos of the X series devices? How do you like the straight wing? Do you really think that they would have developed such a speed at an altitude of, say, 25 km? And here's a fact for you - they reached such a speed at an altitude of about 100 km! Consider space in its purest form! Of course, there is no question of any heating. Well this is a rocket with wings: a rocket plane, they were called that. What do these experimental devices have to do with airplanes? Maybe then the BOR "bast shoe" will be considered a hypersonic aircraft? Further, about 10 years)))) Do you really think that within this period they will make an aircraft with 6M? Nope. And they won't do it for 20.
  2. +1
    1 October 2021 18: 37
    But somewhere there are developments on the Tu-230 / Tu-244.
  3. KCA
    -6
    1 October 2021 18: 52
    While they are hospitable, they have rockets, not only that they do not fly on hypersonic, they are afraid to fall off from the carrier, but there, the plane is already on the runway, give only a trillion, well, two is better
  4. +2
    1 October 2021 19: 17
    The SR-71 spoiled our nerves a lot, we had to meet three times for the service. I hope by the time the Pentagon or the CIA buys SR-72 (if they do of course) we will already have a ready answer not only from the ground (C-500 at M = 9) but also from the air. PAK DP? The declared speed of the SR-72 is 6390 km / h, this is a decent speed, even with a developed advanced military-industrial complex in the United States, manufacturers will have problems
  5. +6
    1 October 2021 20: 53
    In addition, it is unclear how aerial cameras can take pictures through the plasma "envelope" around the aircraft. The presence of plasma virtually excludes electronic reconnaissance.

    Author, Do not confuse this device with hypersonic gliding warheads. At altitudes of 20-30 km at such speeds, there will be no plasma envelope, and below it will never reach hypersound.
    1. -2
      2 October 2021 11: 30
      Quote: Aviator_
      At altitudes of 20-30 km at such speeds, there will be no plasma envelope

      Why, actually?
      1. +5
        2 October 2021 17: 13
        Quote: DenVB
        Why, actually?

        When air molecules are decelerated, their thermal energy increases, i.e., the temperature of the gas near the surface of a moving body increases the maximum temperature to which the gas can heat up in the vicinity of the moving body is close to the so-called. braking temperature:
        T0 = ​​Tn + v ^ 2/2 * cp,
        where Тн is the temperature of the incoming air, v is the flight speed of the body, cp is the specific heat capacity of the gas at constant pressure.
        Specific heat capacity of air at different temperatures

        whatever one may say, at M = 6 it will be up to 700grC
        at this temperature: no plasma is formed
        1. +1
          2 October 2021 18: 38
          Yeah, thanks for the formula. True, according to my calculations, it turned out to be about 1600 degrees. But still not enough for ionization.
          1. +1
            2 October 2021 21: 37
            Quote: DenVB
            True, according to my calculations, it turned out to be about 1600 degrees.

            yes not for that.
            I probably messed up the square in my mind. your truth.
            But there it is somewhat different.
            This formula is valid for М <= 5
            then other processes come into play. that's why they divide supersonic / hypersound
            At M = 5, collisions respond in the molecules themselves. Two atoms in the molecules of the main gases of air, nitrogen and oxygen, begin to resonate with impacts and vibrate, approaching and diverging. During deceleration, kinetic energy is transformed into intramolecular energy. They add their energy to the molecule, along with the energy that begins to manifest itself of another new movement - the rotation of the molecules. These innovations are added to the heat capacity of the gas, storing more and more heat and increasing the energy of the processes.


            through the density of air must be considered, in another way, through the heat flux
            q = 0,5 * po * V ^ 3 * cos (beta)
            where q is the heat flux W / mXNUMX, v is the speed, po is the air density AT a given altitude, beta is the angle between the vector of the flow velocity and the normal to the surface that it flows around.
            At this altitude, po = 0,018 kg / m30 per 0,09 km and 20 per XNUMX km.
            To calculate the beta for up to the angle of the cone of the aircraft to know. There will be about 70-75 gr.
            But below 10 km, it is really hard for the air density to reach 0.4 and almost linearly increase to 1.2 kg / mXNUMX at the Earth's surface.
            for Mk.12A in 6-7 with a decrease from 50 to 35 km, the amount of heat per sq. cm surface exceeds 30 kJ, plasma is generated. Further, with a decrease from 35 to 20 km in 15.3 seconds, each square cm of the surface will receive at least 100 KJ of heat.
            the speed will decrease from 3000 m / s (by 50 km) to about 5 M, then the plasma will disappear
            Yes
      2. 0
        2 October 2021 20: 19
        Why, actually?

        Because at a speed of 6M and a density of 0,01841 kg / m3 (height 30 km), there is no plasma layer around the device.
        1. +1
          4 October 2021 09: 40
          Is there enough oxygen at an altitude of 30 km to power a ramjet engine?
          1. +1
            4 October 2021 18: 56
            It seems like enough
  6. 0
    1 October 2021 23: 56
    They have enough funds to make a reply. I wrote about it (was minus). But the main thing is that we have a remedy against AUG.
  7. +2
    2 October 2021 00: 49
    Motorcycle nacelle SR-71. The movable cone was responsible for the distribution of air between the two circuits of the J58-P4 engine. Photo Wikimedia Commons

    Cyril, I don't know if your phrase is under the photo. Only the cone was responsible for the general braking of air to subsonic speed before entering the first stage of the compressor. This is the so-called "external deceleration" by an oblique shock wave. And the division along the contours went after the fourth stage. The first circuit, as usual, is a combustion chamber, a turbine, an afterburner (aka a ramjet engine), and a nozzle. The second circuit from the 4th stage past the turbine directly into the afterburner. There was no combustion in the supersonic flow.
    This is the stone on the road to hypersound. Useless air braking just to make the fuel burn. And again accelerate before the expiration with a higher speed than you fly. After all, the main working fluid is nitrogen, and we brake it in vain and accelerate it again just for the sake of the oxygen we need.
    1. +1
      2 October 2021 20: 25
      Aleksey, when the hypersonic flow is decelerated to subsonic, the temperature in the traditional spent combustion chamber will be too high, causing fuel dissociation, there will be no reactions there. For hypersonic flight, it is necessary to work out supersonic combustion. Supersonic combustion chambers have been engaged in for more than a dozen years (we were told about this in our 3rd year back in 1975), but the problem is very complicated.
      1. 0
        3 October 2021 15: 52
        In modern realities, all these problems are quite solvable.
  8. -4
    2 October 2021 01: 13
    Did they create SCP-092 too ???
  9. +1
    2 October 2021 05: 00
    For a long time I even read a whole magazine dedicated to the SR-71. A unique car with unique engines. In terms of maximum speed, it even surpassed our MIG-25/31.
  10. +1
    2 October 2021 09: 51
    "Let's improve what can be improved, preserve what can be saved .."
    Strongly reminiscent of Umbridge's speech in the Order of the Phoenix.))
    They seem to be doing something, but no one knows what. The dates are postponed, as with the conquest of the moon.
    "I myself sometimes doubt whether I am or not."
  11. -2
    2 October 2021 20: 52
    About the crew (optional). When performing aerobatics, the speed of a sports aircraft is somewhere between 500-600 km / h. Its pilot experiences (and fights valiantly) overloads of up to 12g. What is the speed of a hypersonic car? The speed of sound is averaged 300m / s. 60 seconds - 1800m. 60 minutes - 1080 km / h. Sorry for the childish details, but you have to be descriptive) So, one Mach, this is an average of 1000 km / h. Six swings, where hypersound begins, is 6000 km / h. Which is ten times more than a sports plane.
    Maybe if the acceleration is very, well, just very smooth, the crew will endure it. But during the maneuver, the overload will reach 120G! I would like to know if this ingenious machine comes with a bucket with a scoop. Optional. For scrubbing the crew off the floor and various hard-to-reach places. Are you fucking serious ?! What is this nonsense?
    Until physics appears on earth again, and those strange shamans who now pose as scientists will not be convicted of fraud, there is no need to talk about any such flights. When (and if) physicists return again, they will have to invent something fundamentally new, completely unknown now, in order to somehow stabilize living organisms at such speed drops.
    Now hypersonic devices can only and exclusively carry something inert, firmly fixed, insensitive to colossal overloads, and six handfuls of electronics, which are very old and very reliable circuits, duplicated fifty times. Most of them at the end of the flight with maneuvering just crumble nafig.
    Hare is delirious, not funny.
    1. 0
      5 October 2021 12: 57
      Just increase the radius of maneuver a hundred times and the acceleration will not go beyond the normal range. This is physics, grade 8 - a = V ^ 2 / R
      1. 0
        5 October 2021 14: 23
        Only a hundred times?) At speeds of 6000 km / h? Take a look at school geometry. Maneuvering curves like this doesn't make sense at all. Easier to go on foot. Walking is more efficient for completing the mission and avoiding anti-aircraft weapons.
        1. 0
          6 October 2021 11: 32
          Well, pay attention to the speed! The lead distance linearly depends on the speed, therefore, the lead must be given 10 times more, therefore, when maneuvering the target, the guidance error (i.e. acceleration) 10 times faster (roughly, of course). Why do you think the Americans are so whining about the difficulties of fighting hypersonic missiles that they wanted to ban them?
          1. 0
            6 October 2021 18: 42
            Nice to read. So I see a stubbornly stubborn Red Army soldier with a pair of Maksimov, looking at the sky through the sight of that time ... I have already talked with the current pro on a similar topic. He looked a lot like a general. But he strengthened to realize that knocking down toys worth a thousand dollars with a two-million-dollar rocket, he would win in all skirmishes until he ran out of missiles and the country would not die of hunger after him. Air defense personnel are not taught this, yes ...
            In general, the processor will calculate the trajectory. Within thousandths of a second, he will determine the type of enemy, and, therefore, the maneuvers available to him. Then everything will depend on drives, barrels and other heavy iron. If HyperLA writes gigantic anti-G curves in the sky, nothing will save it. He cannot do absolutely anything against a more or less decent system.
            Moreover, at its speed it is not even necessary to shoot a rocket, a handful of ordinary shot will destroy it, as our "partners" overkill say. Only the hyper-maneuverability inherent in hyperspeed can save such an aircraft. And the variant described by you is unambiguously inferior to a one-legged invalid on crutches and with a backpack. A disabled person has more chances to complete the task ...
            1. 0
              8 October 2021 10: 10
              It's clear. You are not friends with physics, you are not friends with geometry either - is it hard to imagine that in order to hit a moving target, you need to shoot in front of it? And the faster it moves, the further forward you need to move the sight? That is, they did not serve in the army, you have no idea about the use of weapons. What to talk about?
              1. 0
                9 October 2021 10: 18
                Ilya, how old are you)? Okay ... Well, you see, modern technology is cool. Only now people are not cool at all, as they said in my time - "neither mind nor fantasy." Previously, it was such an expression of a joke, but now it is a description of rough reality.
                We shoot towards the target. She begins an evasion maneuver. At this moment, the computer starts calculating the options - what kind of goal we have, and where it is going. As soon as the maneuver along the anti-G curve begins, the calculation will immediately go to the command of the complex. Because you can't get off the curve. Impossible, the crew is finished.
                Think about it, please. We have a huge segment of the trajectory on which we know absolutely exactly how the target will go. To choose a lead on it even for a simple microprocessor is a trifle trifle). That is why I am writing what I am writing, and you all do not catch up and do not catch up. Improve yourself, Ilya, develop yourself.
            2. 0
              20 November 2021 16: 43
              Michael 3. There are such similar ones not anywhere else, only in Russia. All-directional rockets powered by stars. It doesn't explode or fire. And she has a circular saw in her nose. She catches up with any rocket and circular saws any product onto boards. Then she catches up with the next one and cuts, and everything takes a fraction of a thousandth of a second. In a minute, it can halve a thousand rockets flying in space. What flies below the Cosmos pushes those to the ground with special wheels, bangs and smashed to smithereens. Then it rises again into Space and is charged by the Solar wind, or a bunch, and again can guard the borders of the country for a whole year exactly along the lines on the map.
              1. 0
                20 November 2021 22: 59
                Was it thin yumar or fat? I didn't quite understand) To make a selection of signs and give a command to the actuators - this was first used by weavers, with the help of metal slotted drums, to make jacquard fabric. Google what century it was)
                Yes, now it is not the USSR, we no longer have a scientific and engineering elite engaged in defense. So, pitiful scraps among the rabid thieves ... But the technique has also changed. Previously, everything described was a miracle of science and technology. And now you sadly sculpt a couple of hundred lines of program for a simple process, test your mistakes, and you're done.
                The only problem now is that people do not pull - their brains are weakened, imagination has disappeared. Now people cannot cope with the tools that they themselves have created. But for these trifles, the current scanty cerebellums are quite enough.
                1. 0
                  20 November 2021 23: 05
                  The program is a program, but they will never guess to put a circular saw on a heavy-duty military facility. I just forgot to put the device for sharpening the circular. You, please, put it somewhere. Sharpened, she will cut smoothly and without pain, and dull will just stupidly kill the enemy. There are no analogues, as well as analogue.
                  1. 0
                    20 November 2021 23: 09
                    I should have thumped yesterday, today it’s not comme il faut somehow) Sorry, but I only have one life. Wasting it on humor of this level is stupid.
  12. -1
    3 October 2021 06: 15
    When commentators on VO say that we will not succeed, this is normal.
    However, when people who are knowledgeable enough say that Lockheed Martin will not work, it is a bit intimidating.
    1. +1
      3 October 2021 15: 53
      Yes, everything will work out for them - over time.
  13. 0
    20 November 2021 16: 36
    Nicely drawn. Even if it does not fly, it is still beautifully drawn. In truth, the United States could borrow the necessary planes from Hollywood and do things with them on the screen that others have never dreamed of. There are no analogues even in other film studios.
  14. -1
    10 December 2021 23: 03
    What kind of hyper-sound on an airplane? They have not yet been able to go into hypersonic missiles, but here the 6M is on the plane. Das ist fantastical!