Afghan army female special forces

64
Afghan army female special forces

In light of the recent events in Afghanistan, it is safe to say that all American hopes of creating a combat-ready Afghan army have failed. Neither the military, nor the state security officers, nor the police offered any serious resistance to the Taliban. Most of them folded easily weapon or sided with the Taliban.

This article will focus (as far as the available information allows) only one unit of the Afghan army, namely: the female tactical platoon FTP (Female Tactical Platoon).



The Afghan government and its US-led NATO allies sought to make joining the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF) an attractive proposition for Afghans, and the presence of women, especially in the special forces, should further contribute to this goal.

Although Afghanistan is far from the gender equality that the West most expects from modern countries, the FTP members viewed their platoon as "a spearhead that opens the minds and hearts of their compatriots."

“We need girls. We need FTP, ”one of the servicemen said in an interview with the Ministry of Defense. "The reason is that we have to serve women, and if women join the army or FTP, that is good because they can serve everything that belongs to women."

The idea for such a unit emerged in 2015 at the same time as the founding of Resolute Support (RS), an organization that is a NATO-led non-combat mission to train, advise and assist the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, which have assumed national responsibility for the security of Afghanistan. ...

Women's mission


The FTP Female Tactical Platoon is a female-only platoon.

He was assigned to the elite Ktah Khas unit of the Afghan Special Forces. The main task of the platoon was to support the Afghan special forces during counter-terrorism operations, specializing in searching, interrogating and providing medical assistance to women and children.


They acted in tandem with their male counterparts and bore the same burdens and risks. The training of the fighters (female military personnel) was carried out by specialists of the special operations forces of the US Army, primarily women.

The platoon was 120 people.

To join the ranks of the female tactical platoon, a woman must already be an officer or non-commissioned officer of the Afghan National Army or the Afghan National Police, be literate and physically prepared. In some cases, applicants were recruited through intensive recruitment from local populations with the right skill set.

The volunteers underwent a weekly assessment of fitness tests such as push-ups, squats and two-mile runs, physical examinations, literacy tests, and other tests.


FTP recruitment was similar to that of most special operations units. The responsibilities of many positions require additional specialized verification and training for critical assignments. Job requirements assume that only the most qualified women are accepted and trained in the program: they must be literate and willing to endure the harsh conditions of service.

According to Lt. Col. Tana Kobra, the first Afghan female commando, joining the army or the police is more daunting for an Afghan woman than in other countries.

“Getting into the army is not easy. Before getting here, they go through many trials. They don't just come and sign a contract like in any other country, she said. - Many young women go through a lot of quarrels with their families. In this case, quarrels with the family can last a week or two. But the women entering the FTP course are tenacious. We had some who trained until they passed out. "

“These women are not driven by money. They don't sign a contract because of the money. They are recorded because of patriotism. They sign up because they are now allowed to work,
- said the adviser on gender issues of the Ministry of Defense. -
They say, "I need to get rid of the terrorists in order to change my country."

However, all these statements, in principle, did not change the problems with recruiting to the unit.

In 2017–2018 alone, 20 women left FTP. The reason turned out to be commonplace for the special forces. In 2017, in Herat, the platoon suffered its first losses - one of the servicemen died, which was the reason for the departure of the above-mentioned number of servicemen.

After the assessment stage, the candidate for the department moved on to an eight-week basic training course. It included such subjects as: physical training and hand-to-hand combat, orientation on the ground, fire training, methods of movement on the ground, observation and camouflage, basic medical training. The initial assessment and basic training were supervised by female counselors from the United States.



This was followed by the basic training course.

The learning process was continuous and consisted of fifteen weekly cycles, which were periodically repeated. They included theoretical studies and practical exercises. The basis was classes in medicine, landing from a helicopter, camouflage and covert movement in the terrain, fire training, the rules for searching people and premises, the basics of interrogation, the ability to negotiate, entering the premises, English and Pashto, etc.


The only way to interrupt training is to deploy to complete a task or "leave." Women served throughout Afghanistan and were regularly sent to densely populated areas in provinces such as Kandahar and Bagram. In these missions, they mainly provided medical assistance, primarily to women and children. They also acted as negotiators and carried out body searches of women. During one such operation in Herat, during failed negotiations with an armed group of Islamists, one of the soldiers was seriously injured and died soon after.


The women worked in a team of 6 people. Once the team has been selected for the upcoming assignment, they must complete 12 practice exercises that support the search, health care, and interviewing requirements, as well as two full mission profile training exercises based on scenarios. Before being sent on the mission, the women's and men's units participated in joint training.

It is important to note that upon completion of the mission, the women received two weeks' leave.
As noted above, women conducted all training and activities together as a group. However, in the future it was planned to divide the unit into two platoons: training and tactical. The women's training platoon was to focus on recruitment, assessment and training, while the women's tactical platoon was to focus on preparing and conducting upcoming operations.

This change is noteworthy.

In essence, it meant institutional support by the Afghan government for the FTP program and long-term investment in the development of a unique component of the Afghan special forces.

According to a NATO Civilian Support Group advisor, Afghan women have been taking on the role of “trainers” in physical training as early as 2019 and 2020.

“We have appointed several girls as physical training sergeants. They conduct training under the supervision of instructors as well as on their own, and I think this is the next step for their future career. "

- said the adviser.


It is also worth mentioning that there were additional opportunities for women from FTP.

They may have participated in the Department of Defense's Gender Professional Opportunity Program: additional training in English, dari, and work skills such as computer literacy, which can also contribute to career development.

FTP fighters at that time, it seemed to them, understood the importance of their mission. They worked and performed duties that filled a critical gap in counterterrorism missions, supporting and streamlining the operations of the Afghan Army's Special Forces.

However, where did their understanding of their mission in the fight against terrorists go when the latter tried to seize power in Afghanistan?

The question remains open.

What happened to the female warriors after the Taliban took over Kabul?

Unknown.

Most likely, they went home. But it is more likely that most of them, along with their families, were evacuated by the Americans. Staying in a country with such a track record would be very dangerous. Although - who knows?
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    4 October 2021 06: 04
    Remember our proverb / folk wisdom ... "a woman with a cart, it's easier for a mare."
    The local people, we can be radicals, as the Westerners consider them, BUT, they do not want such radical changes in their way of life!
    1. +9
      4 October 2021 06: 44
      This is all for PR. In real life, this female special forces against the local mujahideen are about nothing.
      1. +1
        4 October 2021 09: 57
        Quote: Bashkirkhan
        This is all for PR.

        Exclusively. To demonstrate the secularity of the regime, open, like, for democratic values. The cardboardness of these operetta Amazons is striking for everyone. And the Talibos do not touch the protesters in Kabul for a well-known reason - they may be left without handouts from the "world community." But, I suppose, the Middle Ages will soon prevail in the conflict between faith and "democracy".
        1. 0
          4 October 2021 16: 30
          "may be left without handouts:" the world community "seems to be Taliban-2 took into account all the blunders of their predecessors.
          It was reported that the Chinese were reanimating the Bagram airbase. Naturally, the Taliban will "listen to the recommendations" of the same Chinese
      2. 0
        5 October 2021 00: 45
        Quote: Bashkirkhan
        This is all for PR. In real life, this female special forces against the local mujahideen are about nothing.

        Sunglasses and headscarves look especially funny)))
    2. +3
      4 October 2021 06: 46
      "A woman with a cart, it's easier for a mare."

      Well, how can I say it. If the guy with the cart, then it will also be easier for the mare.
      1. +1
        4 October 2021 07: 02
        Of course it's easier. Which is the best: to ride alone or with an additional weight?
    3. +4
      4 October 2021 07: 45
      hi hello, Victor! There were articles on VO about modern Kurdish women warriors.
      1. -1
        4 October 2021 08: 48
        Hi Dmitry soldier
        The striped ones never understood that you shouldn't climb into someone else's chicken coop with your Wishlist, especially the one where a specific rooster commands!
        The Kurds have their own rules, which have been established for a long time ... not only with them, by the way.
        1. +1
          4 October 2021 08: 55
          In my opinion, the states have never bothered with oriental studies. They have one principle for everyone ---divide m conquer
          This is what ours have studied a lot. Although the British have a lot of experience. Different
          1. 0
            4 October 2021 10: 00
            Quote: Reptiloid
            They have one principle for everyone - divide and rule.

            No all, for myself... For everyone, the principle is simple:
          2. +1
            4 October 2021 11: 29
            Quote: Reptiloid
            They have one principle for everyone - divide and rule.

            This zhentelmeny could do something like that ... minke whales are simple guys, their motto is "Soak and rob" .... something like that.
            1. +1
              4 October 2021 20: 40
              NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. The main initiative, as if from the states was
          3. 0
            10 December 2021 04: 45
            Quote: Reptiloid
            In my opinion, the states have never bothered with oriental studies. They have one principle for everyone - divide and rule

            But Putin also divided both Georgia and Ukraine in order to rule over them. Yes, and Modova is divided, so that she was also "on the hook". Or is it not the same "principle"?
    4. -2
      4 October 2021 08: 28
      The Taliban (in their understanding) need suicide bombers and nothing more.
      Gulchetai, don't open your face, coronavirus, however ...
      1. 0
        4 October 2021 08: 52
        They want to keep the way of LIFE that they WANT!
        By the way, where, when, did they use women as suicide bombers ??? FACTS?
      2. +1
        4 October 2021 10: 09
        Quote: knn54
        The Taliban (in their understanding) need suicide bombers and nothing more.

        Why do they want suicide bombs, what nonsense? The place of a woman is prescribed by the Shariah - that's all. They do not accept and do not understand emancipation. It is possible to rewrite the Constitution, not the Koran.
        1. 0
          4 October 2021 10: 38
          let's girls, on the hooks!
          At the Afghan military base in Bagram, abandoned by the Americans back in July, electricity appeared and military aircraft landed. According to the British edition of the Daily Mail, the Chinese have settled at the airbase.
          The publication, citing its own sources, writes that military aircraft have appeared at the Bagram airbase, and the power supply has also been restored. At the same time, according to unconfirmed reports, it may be the Chinese who occupied the former stronghold of the United States.

          The fact that the airbase has received power supply and is functioning again is confirmed by other sources. At the same time, it is noted that the Taliban * (the movement is banned in Russia as a terrorist movement) were hardly able to restore the airbase's functionality, especially to lift heavy military transport aircraft into the air. At the same time, a lot of evidence of several military aircraft taking off and landing at the airbase appeared on social networks.

          The Daily Mail speculates that the Chinese military is stationed at the airbase, especially since the director of the Chinese program at the Stimson Research Institute, Yong Sung, recently said that China would "gladly" occupy Bagram and seize any equipment left over from the United States. Also, remember that the Taliban * called China their "best friend" in the world.
          https://topwar.ru/187702-britanskoe-izdanie...e-samolety.html
          1. +1
            4 October 2021 12: 07
            Well, the Chinese are in Bagram, and how is this quote to the female special forces? because
            Quote: Dead Day
            let's girls, on the hooks!

            what eh?
    5. -1
      4 October 2021 11: 23
      I hope they do not have such a division "would sooner be war, but surrender as a prisoner."
  2. +2
    4 October 2021 06: 08
    It really was a good start. Protectionism is bad, and opportunities are always good.
    As I understand it, in terms of efficiency, the unit did not show itself in the end?
    1. 0
      4 October 2021 07: 24
      Quote: Etherion
      It really was a good start... Protectionism is bad, and opportunities are always good.

      Let's just say, strongly conditionally "good start". By and large, aunts should take care of the house and children, and not rush around the theaters of military operations. I admit their participation as nurses, but I do not understand their realization of this opportunity in the event of an inguinal wound of any uncle. She will then be pelted with cobblestones.
      Quote: Etherion
      As I understand it, in terms of efficiency, the unit did not show itself in the end?

      What is there to say about this unit, if the entire Afghan army, fostered with mattresses, ultimately turned out to be ineffective. Yes
      1. -1
        5 October 2021 02: 16
        She will then be pelted with cobblestones.
        In Russia too? Should women not be allowed to the front in the Second World War?
        1. 0
          8 October 2021 19: 42
          Quote: Etherion
          She will then be pelted with cobblestones.
          In Russia too? Should women not be allowed to the front in the Second World War?

          Misha, what are you talking about?
          Do you really not overlook the meaning of a woman's place in the Christian and Muslim world, or have you decided to cling to words so simply, for everything is the same for you?
    2. +1
      4 October 2021 12: 44
      "in terms of efficiency" the entire Afghan administration and army turned out to be ineffective
  3. -2
    4 October 2021 06: 12
    Everything. Kirdyk to the Taliban.
    The female wild division will sweep away these jackals!
    1. 0
      4 October 2021 07: 03
      So far, that talian demolished everyone
    2. -3
      4 October 2021 07: 05
      But it is more likely that most of them, along with their families, were evacuated by the Americans.

      I doubt it
      They had no time for them. They themselves ate their feet. All nato allies abandoned
  4. +1
    4 October 2021 07: 17
    Comrades, in my opinion the material was late: the Afghan army no longer exists.
    The material appeared, somewhere in April or May, when the army existed and the material was appropriate
  5. +1
    4 October 2021 07: 21
    "tactical platoon" but 120 is a bit too much for a platoon.
    1. +2
      4 October 2021 07: 45
      Quote: vladcub
      "tactical platoon" but 120 is a bit too much for a platoon.

      For certain functions, women are useful. Transfer, search of women ...
      Not a bad idea. If you look at the female warriors of Israel and the Kurds ... not bad.
      1. +2
        4 October 2021 08: 20
        If you look at the female warriors of Israel and the Kurds ... not bad.

        Well, the Jews have nowhere to go, again, there are not female special forces, but technical units, but the Kurds - there are really female units in combat units. By the way, my friend - an Afghan veteran (1981-1983) told (and cited a photo) that in their area there was Fatima - the commander of the local militia, so to speak, "Shindand Etoile" (by analogy with the chieftain from the movie "Bumbarash"). She commanded the men, as in the aforementioned film.
        1. 0
          4 October 2021 09: 45
          Quote: Aviator_
          If you look at the female warriors of Israel and the Kurds ... not bad.

          Well, the Jews have nowhere to go, again, there are not female special forces, but technical units, but the Kurds - there are really female units in combat units. By the way, my friend - an Afghan veteran (1981-1983) told (and cited a photo) that in their area there was Fatima - the commander of the local militia, so to speak, "Shindand Etoile" (by analogy with the chieftain from the movie "Bumbarash"). She commanded the men, as in the aforementioned film.



          I agree, Sergei, Kurdish women warriors are good fighters.



      2. +1
        4 October 2021 11: 25
        "women are helpful" agrees. I said that the number for a platoon is too much
        1. +1
          4 October 2021 18: 10
          Quote: vladcub
          "women are helpful" agrees. I said that the number for a platoon is too much

          Yes, Svyatoslav, maybe they have such a command and control system request I do not know.
  6. 0
    4 October 2021 08: 32
    Well ... "Western pernicious influence"! I mean, the influence of Western democracy ... To what state has this "Western democracy" brought women in the "Western world"? Until the state of the state ... the state of habaloks, "yazhmamoks" in the worst sense of the word, aggressive individuals who have lost their femininity ... Even in Russia, the influence of this "Western democracy" is noticeable! It is becoming more and more difficult to meet a woman whose main advantage is femininity in the traditional sense ... The Internet is filled with "vidos" showing "yazhmamok", other aggressive bitchy individuals in female guise, who believe that they can do anything, but they do not owe anything to anyone ! Once upon a time in the "Western world" there was a movement for the emancipation of women, seeking equality ... Women became equal ... and what then? "Emancipated" women's organizations did not disappear (the most bitchy individuals remained in them, for whom equality was not the main thing from the very beginning!) And began to "fight" for "sameness", which contradicts nature itself and God's scripture ... (if for who does this aspect mean!). It was then that "female" demands (!) Appeared about permission to work for them on a construction site as bricklayers, steelworkers, participate in professional martial arts tournaments with men, serve in the army in combat units and have the opportunity to kill ... the right to punish men legally, those who "dared" to give flowers to women, to give them compliments, who are trying to pay for a woman in a restaurant, cafe ... , then they immediately "remember" that they are "girls" and therefore they cannot be beaten! This is mainly about situations in Russia, for example ... "about" girls "when the police come to the showdown!) And now" Western democracy "begins to get to the last lines of men's defense ... the eastern bastions of male domination! God save us!!
    1. 0
      4 October 2021 10: 52
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      It is becoming more and more difficult to meet a woman whose main advantage is femininity in the traditional sense ... The Internet is filled with "vidos"

      Ah, vidos ... Have you tried to "meet a woman" offline? I do not notice the total lack of "femininity in the traditional sense." And then this is for the "traditional understanding"? Katerina Matvevna from "White Sun ..."? Why hustle?
      1. -1
        4 October 2021 13: 17
        Quote: Ashes of Klaas
        I do not notice the total lack of "femininity in the traditional sense." And then this is for the "traditional understanding"?

        Exactly ! You do not understand what "traditional femininity" is ... (yes, probably, what is femininity, in general!); but at the same time claim that you do not notice the lack of femininity! Means, you have not "grown up" to this concept! Therefore, it makes no sense for me to "talk" with you further ...
        1. +1
          4 October 2021 16: 00
          Easier, grandpa. Such "experts on femininity" occupied all the shops at the entrances.
          1. 0
            4 October 2021 16: 35
            Hmmm ...! As for "traditional femininity", so "do not understand, no be, no me" ... but how to be rude - so "a university with honors"?
            1. 0
              4 October 2021 16: 49
              Quote: Nikolaevich I
              Mdaaa ...!

              And you, bigots, do not deserve more. You want to drive everyone into your redneck framework forever. The relics are soviet.
              1. 0
                4 October 2021 18: 08
                Quote: Ashes of Klaas
                You want to drive everyone into your redneck frames forever

                Well. Certainly ! You are the "new" generation ... the USE generation!
                1. 0
                  4 October 2021 19: 25
                  No, I have a classical Soviet education, but I could not stand your gobbled home-building morality. And do not poke this mr - she has two generations of Soviet habals in her anamnesis. And this gene trash is ineradicable. And you hang all the snot senile with a fringe about the "lost standards of femininity" and dress up as bench experts.
    2. +1
      4 October 2021 11: 39
      Nikolaevich, about emancipation. Probably, you and I are close in age?
      In our time, "rip off" to swear and booze like a man. It was rare. And her niece, she 1975, already in the 6th grade began to "diversify the vocabulary." And every year more and more "tears"
  7. 0
    4 October 2021 11: 24
    It was a mistake, we had to train more women. Perhaps knowing what they will lose, they will fight more than the Afghans.
    1. 0
      4 October 2021 11: 48
      Quote: Decimalegio
      we had to train more women.

      Who are we"?
      1. 0
        4 October 2021 12: 09
        we Westerners had to educate more women than men.
        now the translation is better.
        1. +1
          4 October 2021 13: 24
          Quote: Decimalegio
          we Westerners had to educate more women than men.

          This phrase is tantamount to admitting "we, Westerners, do not know a damn about Sharia and Afghanistan in general." Is it okay that, for a minute, we are talking about a conservative Muslim country?
          Quote: Decimalegio
          Perhaps knowing what they will lose, they will fight more than the Afghans.

          This is pathos and nothing more. First, you need to turn Afghanistan into a secular state, emancipate its inhabitants, and then mold the resulting heroic warriors. The West has failed in either one, or the other, or the third. This march on the Afghan rake could not end in anything else a priori.
          1. 0
            4 October 2021 13: 32
            what do you have against the pathos in question ??? maybe you prefer to use ethos ???
            1. 0
              4 October 2021 13: 34
              maybe if we all used logos it would be better
    2. +1
      4 October 2021 12: 32
      Quote: Decimalegio
      It was a mistake, we had to train more women. Perhaps knowing what they will lose, they will fight more than the Afghans.

      we Westerners had to educate more women than men.
      now the translation is better.

      The mistake was generally getting into Afghanistan. In order to realize this mistake, the mattresses had to kill hundreds of thousands of Afghan civilians, several thousand of their soldiers, 2 trillion dollars and 20 years of thought, that would ingloriously leave and leave the terrorists with weapons worth 80 billion dollars.
      1. 0
        4 October 2021 12: 57
        I don’t like it, but if you want to throw it into politics, I’ll tell you that it was right, it was wrong to stay unnecessarily for so long, and finally it was a mistake how the departure was organized. But let me remind you that the trip to Afghanistan is a mistake, which the Soviet Union also made, of course, it did not persist in this mistake for 20 years, but times were different. hi
        1. +1
          8 October 2021 18: 24
          Quote: Decimalegio
          But let me remind you that the trip to Afghanistan was a mistake, which the Soviet Union also made, of course, he did not persist in this mistake for 20 years, but the times were different.
          Let me disagree with you. In any case, the USSR built factories, schools, roads in Afghanistan, taught Afghan students in engineering, medical, humanitarian universities, etc. and so on, which the Western coalition led by the Americans did not do from the word at all and conscientiously destroyed everything that was built by the union, partially adapting some objects to their needs - the same airbase in Bagram. In addition, to counter the USSR in the 80s, the Americans armed and financed the mujahideen, of which such a movement as Al Qaeda later grew. As for the 20-year presence of the Americans, they existed there autonomously and Russia, unlike the Americans, did not support the Taliban by planting finances and weapons on them. So the "mistake" of mattresses is exclusive and the most stupid, because no one helped them in order to feel what they had put into their own pants.
          1. 0
            10 October 2021 23: 44
            Pakistani intelligence ISI defeated the USSR in Afghanistan with the help of the United States. And ISI has always defeated the USA with the help of the USA. Pakistan has always won in Afghanistan
          2. 0
            10 October 2021 23: 50
            I do not know if it is more stupid to shoot at him, despite all the good things that the USSR did in Afghanistan, or it is better to destroy everything and shoot in any case. feel
      2. +1
        4 October 2021 15: 03
        Something suggests that at least half of these weapons that were supplied to Afghanistan for 80 billion are floating on the black markets of weapons around the world and sold out by other countries in the dark, and all this before the Taliban came to power and their arrival is a very convenient way to write off all the missing weapons.
  8. 0
    4 October 2021 16: 22
    Afghan Army, did you seriously think about them?
    In Afghanistan in 1986, there was also the Afghan army, but as my childhood friends who served there told me, now he is your "shuravi, friend", then they take and withdraw from the line of possible contact with the dushmans.
    They were armed and trained at the expense of the USSR, and officers were trained relatively very well, for that region.
    Then they also did not resist, the invisible moads who entered.
    Again, only the Northern Alliance of the tribes resisted, and they were not a national army, but yesterday's spooks who fought with the "Shuravi" in the Pandsher Gorge.
    It seems that serving in the Army is just a way of income, and they will fight only as part of their clans.

    I noticed nothing new, and there is nothing new in 2021.
  9. 0
    4 October 2021 16: 40
    Comrades that this "platoon" of PR is undoubtedly. This is not the point.
    Whatever one may say, but Afghan society is very conservative and I doubt that such a feminism would be liked. This means that American consultants did not take into account the psychology of society.
    PS. Then they remembered: Israel and the Kurds, and they cannot otherwise
  10. -1
    4 October 2021 17: 05
    I do not believe that in Afghanistan they can recruit anyone at all. There is a Stone Age and the attitude towards women is concomitant. For them, a woman, by definition, cannot say something to a stranger.
    1. +1
      4 October 2021 17: 28
      Quote: APASUS
      For them, a woman, by definition, cannot say something to a stranger.

      Silently shoot? smile
      1. 0
        4 October 2021 21: 49
        good advice. First the woman shoots, and then she asks a question to a stranger. good
  11. 0
    4 October 2021 23: 14
    Women, as a rule, are better motivated than men and rarely reconsider this motivation. It is not for nothing that all the secret services of the world recommend first of all to eliminate terrorists in the instructions, because, unlike men, they do not lay down their arms even in hopeless situations.
    1. 0
      10 October 2021 12: 05
      In other words, women are much more fanatical and not afraid of death. Yes it is.
  12. 0
    5 October 2021 23: 40
    Lebanese girls from Kataib during the war in Lebanon. Not always military women are window dressing. They are fighting and real. They fought in Beirut.