Chinese air defense systems in the Korean War

58
Chinese air defense systems in the Korean War

After the liberation of the territory of China from the Japanese invaders, peace did not come to the country. The former allies - the Kuomintang and the Communist Party - clashed in mortal combat.

The US supported the Chinese nationalists right up to their flight to Taiwan. The best material and technical equipment of the Kuomintang troops up to a certain point allowed them to take over the armed formations of the Chinese communists. However, the support of a large part of the population in the countryside and assistance from the USSR allowed the CCP to change the balance of power and achieve victory in the civil war.



Due to the fact that the Chinese communists had almost no military aviation, the anti-aircraft guns available to the Kuomintang were used exclusively against ground targets. At the first stage, anti-aircraft units in the CPC troops were almost completely equipped with captured Japanese anti-aircraft guns, which were actively used both against Kuomintang aviation and to provide fire support to ground units.

Anti-aircraft machine guns



After the introduction of Chinese People's Volunteers in Korea in October 1950, the question of covering them from air strikes arose. From the first days of the participation of Chinese troops in hostilities in Korea and until the conclusion of the armistice in July 1953, rifle-caliber machine guns were actively used against the aviation of the UN forces.


At first, these were captured Japanese Type 96 and Type 99 light machine guns produced at Chinese enterprises ZB-26, Canadian-made Bren machine guns repulsed from the Kuomintang, American M1918A2, Japanese Type 92 machine guns, Chinese clones of the German MG 08 machine gun, American Browning M1917A1 and M1919 ...


Later, the Soviet DP-27 light machine guns and the SG-43 easel machine guns were added to them. The Chinese infantry units also had a significant number of Maxim machine guns arr. 1910/30 on an infantry wheeled machine. However, due to the large weight and design features of the machine, these machine guns were practically not used for anti-aircraft fire.


In most cases, the available light machine guns for firing at air targets were operated from improvised supports.


Some of the rifle-caliber heavy machine guns available to the Chinese volunteers allowed anti-aircraft fire from standard machines.


Machine gun SG-43 in position for anti-aircraft fire

According to Chinese sources, captured Japanese Type 1950 13,2-mm anti-aircraft machine guns were used to provide anti-aircraft cover for Chinese infantry units that crossed the Yalu River in the late autumn of 93. But in the spring of 1951, the surviving Japanese-made heavy machine guns returned to China.

By the time China entered the war on the side of the DPRK, the PLA had several dozen 12,7-mm Browning M2NV machine guns. These machine guns were supplied by the Americans to Chiang Kai-shek's troops and became the trophies of the communists after the victory in the civil war.

The Browning M2NV machine gun with a heavy barrel, adopted in 1938, is still in service in the armies of many countries, it can be successfully used against manpower, fight light armored vehicles and hit low-flying air targets. The body weight of the machine gun is 38 kg. Rate of fire 480-550 rds / min. At a distance of 500 m, an armor-piercing 12,7 mm bullet would normally penetrate 16 mm armor.


During the fighting on the Korean Peninsula, American-made 12,7-mm machine guns were repeatedly captured by Chinese people's volunteers.


However, trophy large-caliber "Browning" was used to a limited extent for anti-aircraft cover. Shooting at an air enemy required a large expenditure of ammunition and special preparation of calculations, which, after the start of mass deliveries of Soviet 12,7-mm DShK machine guns, did not make much sense.


Chinese crew with 12,7 mm DShK machine gun

In terms of combat effectiveness, the DShK was not inferior to the American Browning M2NV, but at the same time the Soviet machine gun was more reliable and easier to operate. The main disadvantage of the 12,7 mm DShK machine gun mod. 1938 was a large mass. The body of the machine gun weighed 33,5 kg. The mass of the machine gun on a universal wheeled machine is 157 kg. Rate of fire - 550-600 rds / min. The maximum range for air targets is 2 m, the effective range is up to 400 m. In terms of armor penetration, the DShK and Browning M1NV were approximately at the same level.

Soviet-made large-caliber DShK machine guns were very widely used in Korea for anti-aircraft cover for Chinese troops.


There are many photographs of Chinese calculations from the Korean War period with DShK machine guns prepared for firing at air targets.

Large-caliber anti-aircraft machine guns usually covered places of concentration of troops, battalion and regimental headquarters, warehouses, transport hubs, and small bridges. Attempts to use anti-aircraft DShK installed on trucks to escort transport convoys did not have much success. American attack aircraft and fighter-bombers almost completely blocked transport links in the frontal zone during the day.


After the front line stabilized, the American command, when planning attacks on Chinese and North Korean positions, had to reckon with the enemy's presence of several hundred large-caliber anti-aircraft machine guns, which posed a mortal threat to fighter-bombers delivering bomb and assault strikes.

Small-caliber rapid-fire anti-aircraft guns


At the initial stage of hostilities on the Korean Peninsula, the Chinese people's volunteers had German and Japanese anti-aircraft guns at their disposal.

Judging by the available photographs and fragmentary information published on the Chinese segment of the Internet, at the beginning of 1951, Chinese people's volunteers used 20-mm 2,0 cm FlaK 30 anti-aircraft guns in Korea.


The origin of these 20mm assault rifles is unclear. They could be recaptured from the Kuomintang, or the Chinese communists received them from the USSR from among the trophies captured from the Germans.

During the Sino-Japanese War, the CPC troops were able to recapture several Type 20 98-mm anti-aircraft guns from the Japanese, which were most often installed in the back of trucks and on railway platforms to protect against aviation and attacks from sabotage groups. The Japanese command placed a number of dual-use rapid-fire installations in China along the perimeter of fortified bases.


20-mm Type 98 anti-aircraft gun in a firing position

The principle of operation of the Type 98 automatics was repeated by the French 13,2 mm Hotchkiss M1929 machine gun. For shooting from the Type 98, a 20x124 mm shot was used. An armor-piercing tracer projectile with a mass of 109 g left the barrel with an initial speed of 835 m / s and at a distance of 250 m it could penetrate 30-mm armor.

In the combat position, the anti-aircraft gun was hung out on three supports. If necessary, the fire could be fired from the wheels, but the accuracy of the fire dropped. Weight in firing position - 373 kg. Food was supplied from a store for 20 shells. Rate of fire - 300 rounds / min. Combat rate of fire - up to 120 rds / min. The effective firing range against air targets did not exceed 1 m.


20-mm Type 98 anti-aircraft gun at the War Museum of the Chinese Revolution

After the surrender of the Kwantung Army, the USSR handed over several dozen 20-mm Japanese-made anti-aircraft guns to the troops of Mao Zedong, which in the second half of the 1940s waged an armed struggle against the Kuomintang. A number of Type 98 installations remained in service with the PLA until the mid-1950s. However, in Korea, Japanese-made 20-mm anti-aircraft guns were used very limitedly and only at the initial stage of the war.

During World War II, the most common in the Japanese armed forces were 25-mm anti-aircraft guns. Until August 1945, about 33 000-mm Type 25 anti-aircraft guns were produced.

The Type 96 artillery unit was developed in 1936 on the basis of the Mitrailleuse de 25 mm contre-aéroplanes gun of the French company Hotchkiss. The most serious difference between the Japanese model and the original was the equipment of the German company Rheinmetall with a flame arrester. In addition to the Type 96 single-barreled anti-aircraft guns, during the Second World War in Japan, twin and triple anti-aircraft guns were also produced.

Single-barreled and twinned 25-mm anti-aircraft guns were used mainly on land, while triple-barreled ones were installed on ships and stationary positions. Single-barreled units were often transported in the back of a truck, and paired ones were towed by vehicles with a carrying capacity of at least 1,5 tons.


25-mm Type 96 anti-aircraft gun at the Military Museum of the Chinese Revolution

A single-barreled 25-mm anti-aircraft gun weighed 790 kg and could be rolled by a crew of 4 people. In the combat position, the wheel drive was separated. Food was supplied from a store for 15 shells. Rate of fire - up to 250 rds / min. Practical rate of fire - up to 120 rds / min. Effective firing range - up to 3 m. Height reach - 000 m.

Used ammunition dimension 25x163 mm. The ammunition load could include: high-explosive incendiary, fragmentation tracer, armor-piercing, armor-piercing tracer shells. At a distance of 250 meters, an armor-piercing projectile weighing 260 g with an initial speed of 870 m / s pierced 35 mm armor.


Japanese twinned 25mm anti-aircraft gun at the War Museum of the Chinese Revolution

The twinned 25-mm unit was mounted on a four-wheeled vehicle with a detachable wheel travel. Its weight in combat position was 1 kg. Calculation - 110 people.

After the surrender of the Kwantung Army, among the trophies taken by the Red Army, there were about 400 single-barreled and paired 25-mm anti-aircraft guns and a significant amount of ammunition. Most of these anti-aircraft guns with ammunition were donated to the Chinese communists.

Subsequently, the Type 96 installations were used against the Chiang Kai-shekists and during the hostilities on the Korean Peninsula. Captured Japanese 25-mm anti-aircraft guns were in service with the PLA until the second half of the 1950s, when they were finally supplanted by Soviet and Chinese anti-aircraft guns.

By the beginning of the Korean War, the PLA had more than 250 operational 25-mm Japanese anti-aircraft guns, and they actively fought until the summer of 1951. After that, the Type 96 installations were taken to the deep rear. After several months of active use, a shortage of 25-mm shells began to be felt, and many anti-aircraft guns needed repair.

The main burden of protecting Chinese units from air strikes fell on 37 and 85-mm Soviet-made anti-aircraft guns, the mass delivery of which began shortly after the entry of PLA units into Korea.

Chinese anti-aircraft artillery units deployed in the DPRK in February 1951 were armed with more than a hundred 37-mm automatic anti-aircraft guns of the 1939 model (61-K). Subsequently, their number reached 300 units. Soviet 37-mm machine guns quickly ousted 20 and 25-mm anti-aircraft guns in units fighting in Korea.


37-mm anti-aircraft gun model 1939 in a firing position

A number of sources say that the Soviet Union, in addition to the 37-mm anti-aircraft guns mod. 1939, also handed over to the PRC a batch of 40-mm Bofors L60 installations, received by the Soviet side under Lend-Lease during the Second World War. But it was not possible to find confirmation of this information.

The Soviet 37-mm automatic anti-aircraft gun was created on the basis of the Swedish 40-mm Bofors anti-aircraft gun and was very close to it in terms of its characteristics. Until 1947, more than 18 000-mm anti-aircraft guns mod. 37.

37-mm anti-aircraft gun mod. 1939 of the year could hit air targets at a distance of up to 4 m and an altitude of 000 m. The effective range of anti-aircraft fire was approximately half the size. Rate of fire - 3 rounds / min. The mass of the gun in a combat position without a shield was 000 kg. Calculation - 160 people.


The 61-K anti-aircraft guns were the most effective ground-based air defense weapons available to the Chinese People's Volunteers. One hit of a 37-mm fragmentation-tracer projectile into a single-engine combat aircraft in most cases was enough to destroy it or ensure its incapacitation.

These 37-mm guns had a sufficiently high rate of fire, accuracy, range and height reach to force piston and jet combat aircraft that deliver missile and bomb strikes against point targets to abandon their combat missions in the zone of effective fire.

With the proper level of preparation, the calculations of 37-mm assault rifles in a number of cases managed to achieve high results. So, in the course of repelling enemy air raids on Kaesong, a separate 11th anti-aircraft artillery battalion of the Chinese Volunteer Army shot down 35 American aircraft. According to the official Chinese version, the calculation of one anti-aircraft gun hit 10 aircraft.


Z7-mm automatic anti-aircraft gun mod. 1939 at the War Museum of the Chinese Revolution

To what extent this is true is unknown. In a battle, when all the anti-aircraft guns of a battalion are firing at enemy aircraft, it is impossible to determine whose shell hit this or that target. Nevertheless, the 37-mm cannon mod. 1939 with 10 stars on a splinter shield is displayed at the Military Museum of the Chinese Revolution in Beijing.

75 and 85 mm anti-aircraft guns


At the initial stage of the introduction of Chinese troops into Korea, 75-mm Japanese-made Type 88 anti-aircraft guns were used to provide cover from bombers operating at medium and high altitudes.


75-mm anti-aircraft gun Type 88 in firing position

The 75 mm Type 88 anti-aircraft gun was adopted by the Imperial Japanese Army in 1928. In the transport position, the Type 88 gun weighed 2 kg, in the combat position - 740 kg.

The process of transferring from transport to combat position and vice versa was very time consuming. Particularly inconvenient for deploying an anti-aircraft gun in a combat position was such a structural element as a five-beam support, in which it was necessary to move four beds apart and unscrew five jacks. Dismantling two transport wheels also took a lot of time and effort from the crew.

The maximum reach in height was 9 km, the range for anti-aircraft fire was 12 km. Rate of fire - up to 20 rounds / min.

In addition to a fragmentation grenade with a remote fuse and a high-explosive fragmentation projectile with a shock fuse, the ammunition load could include an armor-piercing projectile weighing 6,2 kg. Having left the barrel with an initial speed of 740 m / s, at a distance of 500 m, when hit at a right angle, an armor-piercing projectile could penetrate 110 mm thick armor.


75-mm anti-aircraft gun Type 88 at the Military Museum of the Chinese Revolution

The first anti-aircraft unit equipped with 75mm Type 88 guns appeared in the Northeastern CPC Army in March 1946. The 16th Anti-Aircraft Artillery Brigade of the Liaodong Military District had 75-mm Japanese-made anti-aircraft guns, German and Japanese 20-mm machine guns, as well as 13,2-mm Japanese anti-aircraft machine guns.
This unit provided air defense for the cities of Harbin, Jiamusi, Mudanjiang and Jilin.

During the siege of Changchun, a Kuomintang C-75 transport aircraft was shot down by 47-mm anti-aircraft guns. In 1949, Type 88 guns were used in the air defense of Wuhan and Guangzhou. In the spring of 1950, they participated in the battle for the liberation of Hainan Island, defending the troops and ships concentrated on the coast near Xuwen.

By the time the Chinese people's volunteers entered Korea, the PLA had two anti-aircraft artillery regiments armed with Type 88 anti-aircraft guns. Although these 75-mm anti-aircraft guns were pretty outdated by the early 1950s, the Chinese used them for lack of a better one.


A major drawback of the Type 88 guns was that their height reach did not allow firing at American B-29 Superfortress heavy bombers flying at an altitude of 9 m. In addition, the fragmentation effect of 000-mm shells was relatively small, and Japanese remote fuses did not differ high reliability.


On October 8, 1950, two divisions of 75-mm anti-aircraft guns crossed the Yalu River in the Kuandyan district to take part in hostilities in the DPRK. Another division was deployed on the Chinese side of the river to cover the ferry and the railway bridge.

Although the effectiveness of the Type 88 guns was low, the presence of anti-aircraft cover in the area of ​​the Yala crossing limited the activity of American aviation. In Korea, part of the 75-mm batteries were placed on the tops of the hills, which gave the best opportunities for firing low-flying aircraft.

In early 1951, anti-aircraft units equipped with 75 mm Type 88 guns returned to China. The anti-aircraft regiment arrived in the city of Jinzhou, where the 61st and 62nd anti-aircraft artillery divisions were created on its base. Each division had one regiment equipped with 85mm anti-aircraft guns and two regiments with 37mm machine guns. Each anti-aircraft artillery regiment had 16 85 mm or 32 37 mm cannons and 12 to 16 12,7 mm anti-aircraft machine guns. By the end of 1952, the 63rd, 64th and 65th anti-aircraft divisions were additionally formed.

After mastering the 85-mm Soviet anti-aircraft guns KS-12 mod. In 1944, the capabilities of the Chinese air defense in terms of countering combat aircraft flying at medium and high altitudes increased significantly.


85mm anti-aircraft guns at the Museum of the Chinese Revolution

The KS-12 gun was created after comprehending the experience of the combat use of the 85-mm anti-aircraft gun 52-K mod. 1939. The new 85-mm anti-aircraft gun has become easier and cheaper to manufacture. Due to an increase in the mass of the powder charge in the case and a longer gun barrel, the initial velocity of the projectile weighing 9,2 kg increased from 800 to 870 m / s, which increased the range and reach in height. The mass of the gun in the firing position was about 5 kg. Height reach - up to 000 km. A well-trained crew could fire up to 12 shells in a minute.


The 85-mm KS-12 was a completely modern anti-aircraft gun for that time. Its range and reach in height, even in a small radius of action, was still enough to fire on American B-29 bombers. In addition, the area of ​​the fragmentation field generated by the detonation of an 85-mm grenade was approximately 1,5 times larger than the 75-mm projectile of the Type 88 anti-aircraft gun.

Combat use of Chinese anti-aircraft artillery in Korea


At the first stage (October 1950 - June 1951), the Chinese anti-aircraft artillery did not differ in high efficiency, although it had a certain chilling and deterrent effect on the aviation of the UN forces. Medium-caliber anti-aircraft guns were used to cover important objects: airfields, railway stations and bridges.

Small-caliber rapid-fire anti-aircraft guns of three divisions, armed with 20-25-mm machine guns and 13,2-mm machine guns, were most often located closer to the front line and for the most part fired at American combat aircraft operating at low altitudes.

From January to April 1951, the 61st, 62nd, 63rd and 64th anti-aircraft artillery divisions, the 524th anti-aircraft artillery regiment and 30 separate anti-aircraft artillery divisions arrived in the DPRK. Each division had 12 rapid-fire 37 mm anti-aircraft artillery mounts and 4 12,7 mm machine guns.

Separate anti-aircraft battalions mainly covered the Chinese troops in the front line.

Faced with the fire of small-caliber artillery guns and large-caliber anti-aircraft machine guns, American pilots began to avoid low-altitude attacks, drop bombs and launch NAR from an altitude of at least 1 m, which reduced the effectiveness of airstrikes and did not allow aimed fire from aircraft machine guns. The cruising altitude was at least 500 m.

Batteries of 85 mm anti-aircraft guns created a danger zone at medium altitudes within a radius of 8 km.


In the second stage (July 1951 - July 1953), the number of Chinese anti-aircraft artillery deployed on the Korean Peninsula increased dramatically.

According to Chinese sources, by the time of the ceasefire, the air defense of ground units in the frontline zone and rear North Korean facilities was provided by 5 anti-aircraft divisions (61st, 62nd, 63rd, 64th and 65th), 21 anti-aircraft artillery regiment and 64 separate anti-aircraft artillery battalions.


In August 1951, the American command, taking advantage of the flooding in the DPRK, aimed up to 80% of its aviation to organize an air blockade. The main targets were railway stations and bridges.

The command of the Chinese forces in North Korea had to send most of the anti-aircraft guns to protect stations and bridges.

In the second half of 1952, the Americans, having failed to achieve victory on the battlefield, reoriented strike aircraft to air attacks on important industrial enterprises, bridges, large warehouses and transport hubs located in the depths of the DPRK.

When covering rear objects, the Chinese used a combination of stationary positions with the organization of anti-aircraft ambushes on the routes of enemy aircraft.

Quite often, the battles of the Chinese anti-aircraft gunners with enemy aircraft took on a fierce character. So, in the battle of Shanganling (November-December 1952), the 601st anti-aircraft artillery regiment, as well as the 20th and 35th separate anti-aircraft artillery battalions, shot down 43 and knocked out 50 enemy aircraft within 154 days.


Faced with strong anti-aircraft resistance, American bombers went into action at night.

In this situation, searchlights and radars began to play an important role. The combat work of the Chinese anti-aircraft artillery units was provided by 5 searchlight battalions, 2 air surveillance regiments and 1 radar battalion.

The main goal of anti-aircraft artillery and searchlights was not so much the destruction of enemy aircraft as disrupting the execution of a combat mission by enemy aircraft, preventing them from reaching guarded objects and forcing them to leave the battlefield or drop bombs anywhere, without reaching their targets.

Another way to protect objects from attacks by enemy bomber aviation was the setting of barrage fire, which consisted in creating a high-density fragmentation curtain along the front, depth and height. Which, in turn, led to an increased consumption of anti-aircraft shells.

Until the second half of 1951, a situation often developed when the anti-aircraft batteries of the Chinese People's Volunteers could not open fire due to the lack of ammunition.

The Soviet Union ensured the delivery of the required amount of ammunition to the PRC, but the American twin-engine B-26 Invader bombers, operating in the dark, actively interfered with the regular supply. These aircraft hunted down transport convoys carrying supplies to the front lines. They fired heavy machine guns at cars and trains, dropped bombs and napalm tanks.

One of the most successful countermeasures against road-hunting night pirates has been the creation of nomadic anti-aircraft groups consisting of a searchlight platoon and a battery of 37mm cannons.

Each such group received its own road sections and changed positions every day. The enemy, not knowing where he would meet fire this time, was forced to raise the flight altitude, which immediately negatively affected the effectiveness of dropping bombs and napalm tanks.

In the end, this is the main thing weapon The B-26 lost its effectiveness, and machine gun fire became useless altogether.

Anti-aircraft artillery played a very important role not only in the defense, but also in the offensive.

In May 1953, the Chinese command deployed 18 anti-aircraft artillery regiments and 5 separate anti-aircraft artillery battalions in addition to the 14 anti-aircraft battalions available in the frontline zone to cover the advancing units of the first line. Thanks to this, the density of 13 anti-aircraft guns per kilometer was achieved in the offensive zone.

Anti-aircraft artillery was mainly used to cover places of concentration of troops before an attack, command posts, artillery positions, bridges, warehouses and other targets in the depth of the defense, as well as to provide offensive actions. The main focus was on stopping attacks by American fighter-bombers and countering enemy aircraft conducting reconnaissance and correcting artillery fire.

Anti-aircraft artillery units repelled more than 5 air attacks and shot down 000 enemy aircraft, allowing Chinese artillery to fire from undefended positions, while transport convoys were able to deliver supplies to advancing troops without hindrance.

After re-equipping with Soviet-made anti-aircraft guns, gaining the necessary experience and qualifications by calculations, Chinese anti-aircraft artillery became a formidable force that had a significant impact on the course of hostilities. According to information published in the PRC, the anti-aircraft artillery of the Chinese people's volunteers shot down more than 2 enemy aircraft in Korea.

The experience gained during the war on the Korean Peninsula had a decisive influence on the further development of the air defense of the People's Liberation Army of China.

Продолжение следует ...
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    30 September 2021 18: 30
    Thank you, it is interestingly written, the photos are good, the phrase "UN forces" in the case of the Korean war is not entirely correct, although formally it is correct, the United States and its allies are closer to reality.
    1. +3
      1 October 2021 10: 36
      Quote: polpot
      the combination of "UN force" in the case of the Korean war is not entirely correct

      quite correctly.
  2. +15
    30 September 2021 19: 19
    Thanks to the author for the article and a lot of photos!
    the number of Chinese anti-aircraft artillery deployed on the Korean Peninsula has increased dramatically.
    I would like to note the participation of our anti-aircraft gunners. In early April 1951, the Minister of War and the Chief of the General Staff sent a directive to the commander of the country's air defense forces on the preparation and dispatch of anti-aircraft artillery divisions and one searchlight regiment to China and North Korea.
    At the beginning of June 1951, the 87th and 92nd anti-aircraft artillery divisions and the 10th searchlight regiment, manned by wartime staff, were sent to China. By the decision of the Soviet government of December 16, 1952, 87th and 92 The 10st Anti-Aircraft Artillery Divisions and the 1953th Searchlight Regiment departed for the Soviet Union in early January 28. The departing divisions were replaced by the 35th and 20th Anti-Aircraft Artillery Divisions and the 1954th Searchlight Regiment, which carried out the combat missions of their predecessors as part of the corps until the end of the Korean War. In November 25 alone, anti-aircraft artillery divisions and a searchlight regiment returned to their homeland.During the hostilities, from June 1951, 27 to July 1953, 153, anti-aircraft artillery formations shot down 212 enemy aircraft (according to some reports, anti-aircraft gunners shot down XNUMX aircraft). This is due to the fact that many of the downed enemy aircraft fell into the Gulf of Korea and there is no material evidence on them, and, in view of this, the issue of crediting the anti-aircraft units of these aircraft to the combat account has not yet been finally resolved.
    F-86-30 - 5 units;
    F-86 - 35 units;
    F-84 - 25 units;
    F-80 - 47 units;
    F-51 - 5 units;
    B-26 - 17 units;
    B-29 - 7 units;
    others - 12 units.
    Losses - 68 people were killed, 165 people were wounded. Lost guns - 6 units, searchlights - 1 unit.
    1. +14
      30 September 2021 20: 14
      Quote: Crowe
      I would like to note the participation of our anti-aircraft gunners

      In this Korean mess, our anti-aircraft gunners had to actively "master" the use of radar detection and gun guidance ... At first, the "radars" had a hard time ... they lacked combat experience; at the same time, the Americans had combat experience in suppressing German air defense radars using Electronic warfare ... later the "radar workers" got used to it ... gained experience ... learned to recognize radio interference ...
    2. +12
      1 October 2021 07: 24
      Quote: Crowe
      Thanks to the author for the article and a lot of photos!
      the number of Chinese anti-aircraft artillery deployed on the Korean Peninsula has increased dramatically.
      I would like to note the participation of our anti-aircraft gunners. In early April 1951, the Minister of War and the Chief of the General Staff sent a directive to the commander of the country's air defense forces on the preparation and dispatch of anti-aircraft artillery divisions and one searchlight regiment to China and North Korea.
      At the beginning of June 1951, the 87th and 92nd anti-aircraft artillery divisions and the 10th searchlight regiment, manned by wartime staff, were sent to China. By the decision of the Soviet government of December 16, 1952, 87th and 92 The 10st Anti-Aircraft Artillery Divisions and the 1953th Searchlight Regiment departed for the Soviet Union in early January 28. The departing divisions were replaced by the 35th and 20th Anti-Aircraft Artillery Divisions and the 1954th Searchlight Regiment, which carried out the combat missions of their predecessors as part of the corps until the end of the Korean War. In November 25 alone, anti-aircraft artillery divisions and a searchlight regiment returned to their homeland.During the hostilities, from June 1951, 27 to July 1953, 153, anti-aircraft artillery formations shot down 212 enemy aircraft (according to some reports, anti-aircraft gunners shot down XNUMX aircraft). This is due to the fact that many of the downed enemy aircraft fell into the Gulf of Korea and there is no material evidence on them, and, in view of this, the issue of crediting the anti-aircraft units of these aircraft to the combat account has not yet been finally resolved.
      F-86-30 - 5 units;
      F-86 - 35 units;
      F-84 - 25 units;
      F-80 - 47 units;
      F-51 - 5 units;
      B-26 - 17 units;
      B-29 - 7 units;
      others - 12 units.
      Losses - 68 people were killed, 165 people were wounded. Lost guns - 6 units, searchlights - 1 unit.

      Thanks for the table! But unfortunately, it appears to be incomplete, and perhaps not entirely reliable.
      There are no 20-25 mm anti-aircraft guns and 13,2 mm machine guns that the Chinese also used. In addition, there are reasonable doubts about the 76mm anti-aircraft guns. In 1939, the production of anti-aircraft guns of this caliber in the USSR ceased. The guns that survived the Second World War were extremely worn out, and the stock of conditioned shots for them was minimal.
      1. +10
        1 October 2021 09: 33
        Than I can ... Thank you for your efforts and the wish to write more often, very informative and perfectly illustrated! Health and success!
      2. +9
        1 October 2021 10: 24
        Sergey personal thanks! I read it in three steps, in the evening I will have to read it for pleasure !!!
        Regards, Vlad!
  3. +7
    30 September 2021 19: 32
    The US supported the Chinese nationalists right up to their flight to Taiwan.
    The Americans raised the banner lowered by the Germans. Until 1938, when the Germans changed their priorities in the Southeast Asian region, they closely patronized Chiang Kai-shek. Some of them, for example Stennes, remained faithful to the chosen course until 1945.
    Thank you, Sergey!
    1. Rin
      0
      2 October 2021 06: 18
      Taiwan is a very highly developed island, a democratic country.
  4. +6
    30 September 2021 19: 34
    A very interesting article with a lot of little-known information.

    > The Chinese infantry units also had a significant number of Maxim machine guns arr. 1910/30 on an infantry wheeled machine.
    I note that China also produced its own Maxim, and it looks like it is in the photo in the article, a tripod and a narrow cooling neck on the casing (based on the Kaiser's MG-08). He and others in the book The Infernal Mower appear, who is interested.
    1. +7
      1 October 2021 07: 26
      Quote: Victor Tsenin
      I note that China also produced its own Maxim, and it looks like it is in the photo in the article, a tripod and a narrow cooling neck on the casing (based on the Kaiser's MG-08). He and others in the book The Infernal Mower appear, who is interested.

      These machine guns were mentioned in the publication
      Chinese anti-aircraft machine guns in the Sino-Japanese War
      https://topwar.ru/186277-kitajskie-zenitnye-pulemety-v-japono-kitajskoj-vojne.html
      hi
      1. +5
        1 October 2021 08: 47
        Many thanks, missed this article.
  5. +7
    30 September 2021 19: 44
    Sergey, as always, is interesting.
    Especially attracted the attention of a photo where one Chinese fighter holds the DP by the bipod over his head .... I wonder if he knows that hot casings can I pour him by the collar ?! laughing
    They, exactly, are extradited down when firing ...
  6. +7
    30 September 2021 19: 45

    Sergei, these are not Chinese, these are South Korean marines.
    1. +7
      30 September 2021 19: 53
      Crap! YUK also had a "Marine Corps" ?!
      1. +8
        30 September 2021 20: 00
        Yes, the Republic of Korea Marine Corps was founded in April 1949.
        1. +6
          30 September 2021 20: 23
          "Cannon fodder" at that time?
          1. +7
            30 September 2021 21: 05
            Why "cannon fodder"? After the first fights, they received the nickname Ghost Killers. They showed themselves very worthy.
            1. +6
              30 September 2021 21: 11
              Not in the know, and therefore the "question mark" at the end of the sentence.
              1. +5
                30 September 2021 21: 28
                Do not know,


                Look at the e-mail.
                1. +6
                  30 September 2021 21: 34
                  Thank you!
    2. +8
      1 October 2021 07: 29
      Quote: Undecim
      Sergei, these are not Chinese, these are South Korean marines.

      Victor, welcome!
      Thanks for the clarification! But in serious enough Chinese sources, this photo is signed as "Chinese volunteers with a heavy M2 machine gun." So trust the Chinese after that ... request
      1. +8
        1 October 2021 07: 40
        Good morning. Yes, there are Chinese resources claiming to be Chinese. But this photograph is from the archives of Edward Holton, and this is a very reliable source.
  7. +9
    30 September 2021 20: 14
    From the first days of the participation of Chinese troops in hostilities in Korea and until the conclusion of the armistice in July 1953, rifle-caliber machine guns were actively used against the aviation of the UN forces.

    Among these machine guns were the German MG-34 and MG-42.

    1. +9
      1 October 2021 07: 30
      Quote: Undecim
      Among these machine guns were the German MG-34 and MG-42.

      The funny thing is that I knew about this, but somehow missed to mention in the publication ... my mistake. feel
      1. +7
        1 October 2021 07: 41
        If the authors did not miss anything - what would the readers write comments about?
  8. +13
    30 September 2021 20: 54
    Comrades! Perhaps I have an "autumn depression", but it seems to me alone that Sergey's materials are the last oasis of thought on the resource?
    1. +5
      30 September 2021 21: 03
      Base?
      1. +6
        30 September 2021 21: 08
        Statistics.
      2. +4
        1 October 2021 00: 10
        Hello, Sergey! smile
        But you don't spoil us with your articles. request
    2. +12
      30 September 2021 22: 23
      Sergey's materials - the last oasis of thought on the resource?

      I would put it a little differently: "Oases of thought on a resource are very rare."
      Another cycle by Alexei Eremenko about Soviet air defense can be credited to the "oases".
      The thought arises that the thought is becoming unpopular. Agitprop, which does not require any thought, is in favor.
      1. +8
        30 September 2021 22: 34
        I judge by myself. The materials under which I can blather something clever now appear once a week. A couple of years ago - once a day. Well, this is probably my dementia, not the resource.
        1. +10
          30 September 2021 22: 44
          No no no. I’m not here for the first time either. Previously, a couple of articles a day at least aroused interest and a desire to discuss something, add something.
          Today, such moments are extremely rare, and articles that carry some kind of new information are even rarer.
        2. +10
          1 October 2021 00: 08
          Hello Anton. hi It's kind of sad all this.
          Can I joke a little about the Chinese in the spirit of the anecdotes of the sixties? smile

          The personnel of the air defense observers of the Chinese People's Army at work during tactical exercises as close as possible to the "combat situation". laughing
          1. +7
            1 October 2021 07: 23
            Post VNOS ...
            "Large" battalions of "Chinese volunteers" saved North Korea.
    3. +9
      1 October 2021 07: 34
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      Comrades! Perhaps I have an "autumn depression", but it seems to me alone that Sergey's materials are the last oasis of thought on the resource?

      Anton, hello!
      But what about "science fiction analyst" Damantsev? I always discover a lot of new things in his articles. Then he will tell you about the use of the air defense system C-200 в Iraq, then it suddenly turns out that SAMs with a radar homing system are used on the S-300PS air defense systems ... wassat An inexhaustible storehouse of knowledge and humor ... smile
      1. +4
        1 October 2021 12: 00
        Hello Sergey!
        Apparently it's a matter of personal preferences. I'm not a techie and more "graze" in the "History" section, and there with the authors "horror-horror"
        1. +5
          1 October 2021 13: 13
          Quote: 3x3zsave
          Apparently it's a matter of personal preferences. I'm not a techie and more "graze" in the "History" section, and there with the authors "horror-horror"

          For most of my conscious life, I work with rather peculiar means of communication, and "writing" is just fun for me, but it hurts my eyes when the author, having taken up any topic, absolutely does not know it. Unfortunately, in recent years on VO this "all the time".
          1. +5
            1 October 2021 13: 18
            As Shpakovsky says - the main thing is clickbait and the density of information flow. Alas, this is becoming an axiom.
            1. +5
              1 October 2021 13: 26
              Quote: 3x3zsave
              As Shpakovsky says - the main thing is clickbait and the density of information flow.

              This is extremely sad. sad I even had disputes about this with the administration of the VO. In my opinion, it doesn't matter how many views an article has scored, if it contains false information, or even more frank nonsense.
              1. +6
                1 October 2021 13: 39
                I even had disputes about this with the administration of the VO.
                There is nothing we can do about it, except to ignore this most blatant nonsense.
                1. +7
                  1 October 2021 13: 46
                  Quote: 3x3zsave
                  There is nothing we can do about it, except to ignore this most blatant nonsense.

                  Or write an ironic comment ...
                  1. +2
                    2 October 2021 12: 14
                    hi
                    Well, or write an ironic headline: "A difficult path to the victory of air defense over Western aviation." Or, in principle, use the words USA, Great Britain, Ukraine, Syria, Stalin (if very harsh - use the words "mattress", "insolent", "Judeo-Bandera", the great leader of the Soviet people, Generalissimo Stalin, etc.). For these key posts, a sea of ​​bot farm employees will run up, screams will be heard without speakers, and there will be Everest comments!
                    Verified
  9. +6
    1 October 2021 07: 24
    Will there be articles about the PRC Army Air Force?
    1. +7
      1 October 2021 07: 38
      Quote: hohol95
      Will there be articles about the PRC Army Air Force?

      Hello! I have already written about the PLA Air Force and Air Defense. If you wish, you can search my profile. hi
      1. +3
        1 October 2021 11: 08
        I’ll look.
        The following information speaks about the good effectiveness of the air defense of the Chinese volunteers - in April 1951, the American 39th and 40th squadrons flew 4 sorties in 400 days and lost, most likely from ground fire, 25 Mustang-class vehicles!
        From the book of S. V. Ivanov "P-51 Mustang".
        And according to the website airwar.ru, 409 Mustangs were lost in the form of a fighter-bomber and 68 in the form of a reconnaissance aircraft.
  10. +4
    1 October 2021 13: 24
    hi
    “... the calculations of 37-mm machine guns in a number of cases managed to achieve high results. anti-aircraft guns hit 11 aircraft. " Something is hard to believe ... but is there any data from the other side about losses? Or maybe there are links to any sources on the Korean War in the air? It seems that there was something in the History of Aviation, but then the IA was still on paper ...
    1. +6
      1 October 2021 13: 45
      Quote: Wildcat
      “... the calculations of 37-mm machine guns in a number of cases managed to achieve high results. anti-aircraft guns hit 11 aircraft. " Something is hard to believe ... but is there any data from the other side about losses? Or maybe there are links to any sources on the Korean War in the air? It seems that there was something in the History of Aviation, but then the IA was still on paper ...

      Good evening!
      I wrote: "According to the official Chinese version" for a reason. In my opinion, the achievements of the Chinese anti-aircraft gunners are certainly overestimated. I also do not really believe that they managed to shoot down "more than 2 enemy aircraft" during the war on the Korean Peninsula. This is very different from the figures published by authoritative sources. But frankly speaking, I don’t want to go into the jungle and engage in deep analysis. This is a topic for a separate publication, and I’m unlikely to tackle it.
      The point is not even how many planes were shot down by the Chinese anti-aircraft gunners, but how reliably they managed to cover their troops from air strikes. At the final stage of the war, they generally coped well with this task.
      1. +4
        1 October 2021 16: 37
        Sergey, fireworks and best wishes! drinks
        Finally, I was given the opportunity to read the article to the end. I have absolutely nothing to add here, "everything has already been stolen before us" smile
        I got a charge of good mood, although I read in fits and starts with a break for a day. good
        A bow from me to your wife. smile love
      2. +2
        2 October 2021 00: 55
        Good evening!
        Yes, the question of losses is interesting and it is not clear where to look at the sources ...

        The Russian Wiki generally gives: "In total, during the hostilities in Korea, anti-aircraft artillery and anti-aircraft machine guns of the DPRK Armed Forces shot down about 500 enemy aircraft, and 104 aircraft were shot down by fighter aircraft. For the first time in the history of wars, the contribution of ground-based air defense systems to its overall effectiveness exceeded the contribution of fighter aircraft."

        V. Morozov and D. Kondratkov in IA2004 No. 2 write: “... according to official North Korean data, the KPA in 1950-1953 destroyed 5729 enemy aircraft, damaged 6484 and captured 11 as trophies. line of achievement of fighter aircraft, anti-aircraft gunners and “shooters-hunters.” According to Soviet-Chinese statistics, in air battles, units of the 64th IAK Air Defense Forces of the USSR shot down 1097 enemy aircraft, BOTH pilots shot down 212 enemy aircraft, and hunters "of the KPA and the" Corps of Chinese People's Volunteers "account for 1284 enemy aircraft (that is, almost five times less than declared by the North Koreans). hunters ".
        The Americans generally confirm the above stated figures of their aviation losses in Korea (a total of 2864 aircraft), while Western historians do admit that the largest number of aircraft they lost was not in air battles, but directly above the front line from small-caliber anti-aircraft guns and small arms fire. weapons (ie, "shooters-hunters"). "

        Where this figure - 2864 - comes from is not clear. What is the official North Korean data ...
        request
        The range is "from about 500 + 104 to 5729" ...
    2. +2
      1 October 2021 15: 32
      If the "UN Army" Air Force lost 409 "Mustangs" in the role of a fighter-bomber, does this count towards the calculations of the Chinese anti-aircraft guns?
      And then I recently read that the presence of a radio range finder at the "Saber" made it possible to shoot the MiG-15 from a distance of 2500 m !!!
      The Americans themselves are not inclined to indicate the exact losses ...
      1. +2
        1 October 2021 16: 02
        Quote: hohol95
        If the "UN Army" Air Force lost 409 "Mustangs" in the role of a fighter-bomber, does this count towards the calculations of the Chinese anti-aircraft guns?
        And then I recently read that the presence of a radio range finder at the "Saber" made it possible to shoot the MiG-15 from a distance of 2500 m !!!
        The Americans themselves are not inclined to indicate the exact losses ...

        We must see how much the Americans have lost in total. In Korea, not only the Chinese fought, but also the North Koreans, as well as Soviet pilots and anti-aircraft gunners.
        1. 0
          1 October 2021 17: 26
          On one side were Soviet, Chinese and North Korean pilots.
          Their opponents were South Korean, American, British, Australian (who flew on Mustangs and Meieors)! Canadian and Turkish pilots flew transport aircraft and did not participate in battles.
          It is also necessary to look at their reporting on losses, and not just the American one.
        2. -1
          2 October 2021 22: 49
          The air group of the British aircraft carrier "Triamph" flew combat missions from July 3 to September 20, 1950. It is indicated that 2 aircraft were lost due to combat impact, 21 aircraft were decommissioned for technical reasons.
          The used aircraft models are "Seafire", "Firefly". 12 pieces of each model. But before the first sortie on July 3, 12 and 9 vehicles were available.
  11. +3
    2 October 2021 00: 23
    I found interesting quotes from Korean documents: "Order No. 238" On the Establishment of Plane Hunter Groups "dated December 29, 1950, signed by Kim Il Sung, which said:
    “In order to strengthen the struggle of ground forces against enemy aircraft, I ORDER:
    1.All corps commanders and military commissars, commanders of divisions, regiments and political workers, deputy commanders of corps, divisions and regiments for artillery units - take air defense measures in accordance with the rules of the military regulations and at the same time create no later than January 5, 1951 in all rifle regiments 2 –3 groups of aircraft hunters.
    To equip groups of aircraft hunters with large-caliber machine guns, anti-tank rifles on a special installation request , heavy machine guns designed by Goryunov, rifles, captured weapons and other types of weapons. "
  12. +2
    2 October 2021 00: 26
    Conversation with the leading personnel of the headquarters of the Supreme High Command of the KPA "On strengthening air defense" dated July 13, 1953:
    “Today I would like to talk with you about some of the problems associated with strengthening air defense ...
    Under the crushing blows of our People's Army units, the American imperialists suffered shameful defeat after defeat. And finally, being in a panic state, they were forced to turn to our side with a proposal to hold negotiations on an armistice.
    The US imperialists act in the most disgusting manner in these negotiations, trying to take revenge for the military-political defeat at the front, on the one hand, and on the other, under the guise of negotiations, are building up their forces for a new military offensive ...
    In order to disrupt the work of our rear, they send a mass of their air vultures to destroy power plants, reservoirs, railways and bridges, barbarously bomb Pyongyang, Wonsan, Hamhung, Chongjin, Sariwon, Hezhu, Nampo, Shinichzhu and other large cities and towns, ruthlessly killing innocent residents.
    The current situation urgently requires us to further strengthen our air defense. This is a very important task that does not tolerate the slightest delay due to the fact that the enemy, relying on his air superiority, is building up his air forces on a large scale in order to take revenge for failure in ground battles.
    The most important thing in strengthening air defense is the creation of a harmonious command and control system, which makes it possible to concentrate in one hands the coordination and management of air defense affairs.
    Until recently, at the Headquarters of the Supreme Command there was no department that would be in charge of air defense affairs in a uniform manner. In other words, the air defense did not have its own master. The other day we organized an air defense department at the General Headquarters. Our main goal is to establish a single harmonious air defense control system. The new department is called upon to lead the air defense in a unified manner, both in the front-line units and in the rear ...
    The next task is to further intensify the movement of aircraft hunters.
    The Airplane Hunter Movement is the most superior method of mass combat against enemy aircraft. Groups of aircraft hunters can be easily organized in any area. They can contribute to the operational struggle to destroy an airborne enemy. The mass organization of groups of aircraft hunters has great economic efficiency. It was noted that now hundreds of anti-aircraft shells are being spent on the destruction of one enemy aircraft. But if you organize a large number of groups of hunters for enemy aircraft, which shoot them down using small arms, then you can save a fair amount of anti-aircraft shells.
    Overestimating the role of anti-aircraft artillery and aviation and underestimating the role of small arms-armed aircraft hunter groups is the wrong view of air defense. In air defense, of course, an important role belongs to anti-aircraft artillery and aviation. But we are unable to place anti-aircraft guns on all mountain peaks, and there is no need for that. In the mountainous conditions of our country, the best means of fighting enemy aircraft is the mass organization of groups of aircraft hunters. "

    Female crew of the DShK heavy machine gun in position in the mountains
  13. +3
    2 October 2021 00: 34
    Continuation of the conversation with the leading personnel of the headquarters of the Supreme High Command of the KPA "On strengthening the air defense" of July 13, 1953: "Along with the widespread deployment of the movement of hunters for aircraft, it is necessary to continuously strengthen anti-aircraft artillery and aviation.
    Antiaircraft artillery plays an important role in air defense. For the defense of the most important objects, it is necessary to strengthen anti-aircraft artillery and place it in a concentrated manner.
    If we consider the state of Pyongyang's air defense, then the anti-aircraft artillery units there are somewhat dispersed, which makes it difficult to destroy enemy aircraft. Anti-aircraft guns must be concentrated to guard the most important objects. Anti-aircraft artillery of medium and small caliber must be placed, depending on the nature of the covered objects, in such a way that organic fire interaction can be ensured. With a separate arrangement of an artillery unit armed with medium-caliber anti-aircraft guns, it must be given a weapon capable of destroying low-flying aircraft and covering anti-aircraft gunners. Recently, enemy aviation has been carrying out a massive bombardment of Pyongyang, in connection with which it is necessary to thoroughly monitor the state of the city's air defense and take specific measures.
    Aviation should also be strengthened ...
    Further, it is necessary to ensure close interaction of anti-aircraft artillery, aviation and groups of aircraft hunters. This is very important for air defense. ..
    The next task is to thoroughly study the nature of actions and tactical techniques of the air enemy and, in this connection, apply the appropriate methods of conducting air defensive combat.
    Without studying the nature of hostilities and the tactics of the enemy, we will not be able to apply suitable methods of combat in any battles - whether in land, sea or air. So, in the national wrestling "sirim", a wrestler who has studied the techniques of his partner in advance, can, taking into account his weaknesses, pick up his right leg with his right foot or perform a throw over himself. The same is the case in the fight against an air enemy. Only with a good knowledge of the nature of actions and tactics of enemy aircraft, it is possible to apply suitable methods of combat and strike at its vulnerable spots. "

    "The most effective of the KPA shooters is considered the DPRK Hero Sergeant Yu Ki Ho, whose crew shot down five enemy aircraft and damaged more than 10. In the 90s, Yu Ki Ho, being a pensioner, lived in Pyongyang."
    Source (for all 3 posts): Aviation History 2004 No. 2 "Not an anti-aircraft gunner and not a pilot, but a hero no worse than them ..."
    https://coollib.com/b/233202-zhurnal-istoriya-aviatsii-istoriya-aviatsii-2004-02/read#t10
  14. 0
    2 October 2021 12: 18
    hi
    And about DREAMS, radar and 100mm anti-aircraft guns in the Korean War, will there be anything?