LCAC hovercraft landing craft

22

LCAC boats in exercise, 2011

The US Navy has a developed amphibious fleethaving different landing vehicles. One of the main ones is the LCAC hovercraft landing craft, capable of transporting people, equipment up to tanks and various cargoes. These boats have been supplying the fleet since the mid-eighties and have proven themselves well over the past decades. However, they managed to become obsolete morally and physically, and therefore their gradual replacement is planned.

Creation processes


The study of the creation of an air-cushion landing craft started in the early seventies at the initiative of the US Navy and the USMC. A number of preliminary projects of such equipment have been developed by the forces of several naval and commercial organizations. JEFF B from Bell Aerospace showed the best results, combining already known solutions from ready-made projects and new ideas.



On the basis of JEFF B, by the end of the seventies, a new version of the landing boat was developed, after which the process of construction and testing of experimental equipment began. By this time, the new boat received the designation Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC), under which it became widely known. The tests were successful and confirmed the calculated performance. The boat received a recommendation for supply.

In the early eighties, all technical and organizational issues were settled, after which the Pentagon issued the first production contracts. Starting in 1982, it was planned to build boats at a slow pace, and later, when the desired results were obtained, to launch full-scale production.


The LCAC boat approaches the dock camera of the USS Kearsarge (LHD-3)

The first stage of production was entrusted to two contractors at once. Textron Marine & Land Systems (TMLS) and Avondale Gulfport Marine (AGM) have received separate orders for 15 boats as part of their "early production at a slow pace." It was planned to continue this stage until 1986, after which the Navy was going to select the most efficient manufacturer and entrust him with the next construction.

Production rate


The laying of the first LCACs at two shipyards took place in 1982. Already in 1984, the boats were handed over to the customer. Two years later, the first unit at LCAC reached initial operational readiness. At the same time, the re-equipment of other units of the fleet was carried out and preparations for full-fledged deployment and operation were carried out.

The first 30 boats were completed and handed over to the customer in 1986-87. At the same time, the fleet decided that further construction would be carried out by the TMLS company. However, they soon had to look for a new contractor. It was the Lockheed Shipbuilding Company. In the future, all new boats were built by the forces of two enterprises, which made it possible to fulfill all plans within a reasonable time.

In the late 48s, two contractors received orders for 91 production boats. Subsequently, new contracts were concluded for additional lots of different volumes and values. As a result, by the mid-nineties, the total number of serial LCACs under construction and planned reached 27 units. The average cost of a boat at that time reached $ 28-XNUMX million.


The landing craft rises into the docking chamber of the USS Portland (LSD-37) Anchorage class

The construction of LCAC boats was completed in 2001. For almost 20 years of production, the main customer, the US Navy, received all the required products in the amount of 91 units. It should be noted that the number of vehicles in combat units has always been less. So, at the beginning of the 72s, only XNUMX boats were present in the ranks. Subsequently, their number decreased again: by the end of the tenth years, there were about fifty boats in service.

In 1994, TMLS began production of LCACs for the first order of the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Forces. Then several new contracts followed, and by the beginning of the two thousandth the Japanese fleet received six boats. Other countries did not buy such equipment.

Technical features


The LCAC boat is a hovercraft with a total length of 26,4 m and a width of 14,3 m.The curb weight does not exceed 89 tons, full with a maximum load of up to 185 tons. superstructures with control posts, power plant elements, etc.

LCACs in the basic configuration were equipped with four Lycoming TF-40B turboshaft engines with a total capacity of 16 thousand hp. In the course of further modernization, modern Vericor Power Systems ETF-40B engines with a digital control system were introduced. The power is distributed to four lift fans and two propellers in the annular ducts.

The normal load of the LCAC is 54 tons, the maximum is 68 tons. This allows the boat to carry up to 180 soldiers, one main tank or other cargo of the corresponding mass and size. Maximum load speed exceeds 40 knots; technically achievable speeds over 70 knots. The cruising range, depending on speed and load, is 200-300 miles.


Unloading a tank ashore

The boats are equipped with modern radio-electronic equipment for navigation and communication. A crew of five works in two cockpits, whose ergonomics are reminiscent of airplanes. For self-defense, there are two units of barrel armament - machine guns of normal or large caliber, or an automatic grenade launcher.

Boats in service


In 1986, the first naval unit at LCAC reached initial readiness. The following year, such boats were first lifted aboard the USS Germantown (LSD-42) landing craft as part of a deployment. In the future, boats of a new type were regularly involved in various exercises, military and humanitarian operations.

Depending on the tasks assigned, LCAC boats could be used independently or together with landing ships. The dimensions and displacement of the boat were determined taking into account the capabilities and limitations of the amphibious fleet. They could and can be transported by amphibious dock ships and more modern UDC. So, dock ships of the old Anchorage type could carry up to four LCACs, and the larger Whidbey Island - up to 5 units. UDCs such as San Antonio or Wasp carry 2 or 3 boats, respectively.

Thus, the LCAC landing craft quickly enough were able to become a large, effective and flexible component of the landing force. First of all, this was facilitated by a high level of tactical and technical characteristics.


Old and new: LCAC boat testing NMESIS missile system

It is curious that the number of LCAC combatants did not equal the number of boats produced. Already in the nineties, processes began that reduced the possible number of boats in operation. So, two units were transferred to the category of experimental vessels for various tests. Another 17 were written off due to damage, resource depletion or for disassembly for parts. As a result, after the completion of the construction of the series, the total number of LCACs in the US Navy was only 72 units.

Extension of terms


The intended life of the LCAC boat was originally 20 years. As a result, the Pentagon and TLMS have been working on the Service-Life Extension Program (SLEP) since the mid-nineties. It was developed and approved in 2000 - a few years before the expected date of decommissioning the oldest boats. The proposed measures made it possible to extend the service life of the boat by 10 years.

The SLEP program has been divided into two phases. The first provided for the replacement of electronic equipment with modern designs. These measures were implemented during the first few years and had a positive impact on the operation of boats, incl. in terms of cost. During the second stage, a major overhaul is carried out with partial replacement and renovation of the hull structures. In addition, the boat again receives modern equipment.

In the tenths, several new renovation and modernization projects were carried out in succession. Once again, we modernized the electronics, modified the body and skirt, and also updated the power plant. Further upgrades are no longer planned due to the development of a completely new landing craft.

LCAC hovercraft landing craft
The lead boat of the new type SSC is being tested

The SLEP program has generally met its objectives. Without it, the oldest LCAC boats would have to be decommissioned in 2004-2005, and after a major overhaul they served until 2015. All measures to update the existing equipment were completed in 2020, so that the most recent samples can remain in service until 2030.

Perspective replacement


To maintain the amphibious forces at the proper level, in 2011 the Navy launched the Ship-to-Shore Connector (SSC) program, the goal of which is to create a modern analogue of the LCAC with higher tactical and technical characteristics. In 2012, TMLS became the winner of the competitive part of the program.

The SSC project provides for the use of the proven architecture and a number of solutions of the LCAC project. At the same time, new materials, components and solutions have been introduced, due to which the boat has a normal load of 75 tons and shows higher running characteristics. Another goal of the project was to simplify and reduce the cost of operation.

The construction of the first batch of SSC began in 2014, and since the beginning of 2020, the equipment has been handed over to the customer. Construction is planned to continue until the early thirties; in parallel, obsolete LCACs will be decommissioned. In total, 80 new boats will be built, of which 72 are intended for combat units.

In this way, story LCAC is slowly but surely approaching its completion. A new project of a boat with improved performance has already been created, and now the Navy can plan to write off old equipment. In the coming years, the boats of the two types will be used in parallel, and by the thirties, the well-deserved but outdated LCACs will finally give way.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    3 October 2021 05: 09
    What always amazed Americans was the scale! Our "Zubr" is better, but it cannot be compared in terms of quantity ... it's a shame, somehow.
    1. -2
      3 October 2021 05: 52
      Quote: aleks neym_2
      What always amazed Americans was the scale! Our "Zubr" is better, but it cannot be compared in terms of quantity ... it's a shame, somehow.

      What's better? These are generally watercraft of a different class.
      The Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC) is a high-speed landing craft from large landing craft docks.
      https://topwar.ru/27421-kater-na-vozdushnoy-podushke-lcac.html
      1. +14
        3 October 2021 07: 30
        Kamrad got excited manenko. lol
        But, nevertheless, in the Soviet Navy there were similar to the American LCAC (only larger - 108 tons of standard displacement and 114 tons of full) landing KVP project 1206 "Kalmar".
        And they are also. could be used as part of the large landing craft project 1174 "Rhino".
        Exit of the Project 1206 hovercraft from the docking chamber of the Soviet large landing ship "Ivan Rogov". 1981 year
        1. +3
          3 October 2021 10: 29
          And now we do not have a connection Landing ship-dock - DKVP, and tasks for such a connection can always be found
          1. +3
            3 October 2021 11: 58
            It may well be that the project 23900 UDC of the Ivan Rogov type will include Murena-M landing craft of project 12061M - in fact, the updated Murena-E of project 12061E, which were built at the Khabarovsk Shipyard for South Korean Navy (pictured below).
            As if they are going to build 8 such boats (4 for each helicopter carrier).
        2. +2
          3 October 2021 16: 51
          There were a lot of things in the USSR. But the noneshnih leaders have a lot of plans. And a sea of ​​kickbacks. Into your pocket.
      2. +4
        3 October 2021 10: 21
        1. Landing boat project 21820 "Dugong"
        2. Landing boat of project 12061 "Murena". It is also used by maritime border guards
        1. +1
          3 October 2021 17: 49
          "Dugong" on the air cavity. There is another way of raising the boat above the water; it is, in fact, going to planing at speed with the help of an air cavity formed under the bottom.
          It's a good thing, but after an independent exit to land, it can return back to the water only with outside help. lol
    2. 0
      3 October 2021 07: 29
      Our "Zubr" is better, but it cannot be compared in terms of quantity ... it's a shame, somehow
      Our "Zubr" is not a boat, does that mean anything to you?
      Although at the request of more, I agree with you.
      1. +3
        3 October 2021 10: 00
        Where did I say / wrote that the ZUBR DKVP is a BOAT? DKVP - amphibious assault ship on an air cushion - read carefully and do not attribute what is not ...
        1. +2
          3 October 2021 10: 29
          Quote: aleks neym_2
          Where did I say / wrote that the ZUBR DKVP is a BOAT? DKVP - amphibious assault ship on an air cushion - read carefully and do not attribute what is not ...

          You compare them landing craft with our DKVP ... Any questions?
          Write carefullyso that we don't read hi
    3. +2
      3 October 2021 09: 24
      Quote: aleks neym_2
      What always amazed Americans was the scale! Our "Zubr" is better, but it cannot be compared in terms of quantity ... it's a shame, somehow.

      ======
      Don't be upset! It's just that the doctrines are different: for the United States, the marines are one of the main branches of the military (and independent!). The total number of KMP - exceeds 200 thousand people, or almost 14% of the total number of the armed forces!). And our MP - is included, as a component of the Navy, its role, tasks and numbers are much more modest: from 12.5 to 35 thousand people (according to various sources), which is only 1.3-3.5% from the strength of the RF Army. Hence the much more modest needs for amphibious assault vehicles! So that everything is natural! hi
      1. +1
        3 October 2021 10: 08
        I agree with you: what tasks, then such means - you don't need too much ... (Maybe drive a nuclear aircraft carrier into the Black Sea? With humor!)
        1. 0
          3 October 2021 13: 25
          Quote: aleks neym_2
          Can a nuclear aircraft carrier be driven into the Black Sea? with humor!

          =========
          "It can fly in" ...... But WHAT will be left of him after that? Well, maybe the zone radioactive infection ?! request
          1. +2
            3 October 2021 14: 00
            The same one, and he is already standing: as Hitler (if I'm not mistaken) said - THE CRIMEA IS A UNSWASHED AIRCRAFT CARRIER! He served in air defense - you can see far from Ai-Petri, and the whole Black Sea is in full view + Middle-earth with Israel and Suez ... and nuclear, in my time, and in Balaklava was enough ...
            1. +1
              3 October 2021 19: 58
              Quote: aleks neym_2
              as Hitler (if I'm not mistaken) said - THE CRIMEA IS A UNSWASHED AIR CARRIER!

              ========
              good I've never heard Hitler say that, but it doesn't change the essence! I have a friend (not a very stupid person, by the way!), To whom, well, I just can't explain the "elementary" truth: "who controls Crimea - he controls the ALL Black Sea "! He believes that in the presence of ICBMs and KR "Caliber" - Crimea has lost its strategic importance, and he cannot understand in any way that BRK "Bastion" and OTRK "Iskander" - from Crimea "reach" ANY NATO port, not to mention Bosphorus! And the S-400, together with the aforementioned "Bastions" and "Iskander", allows you to keep at gunpoint EVERYTHING that floats and flies in / over this water area! About the fact that Belbek, together with the planes, is almost in the middle of this water area, I’m not even talking about it ...hi
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. 0
                    4 October 2021 15: 11
                    The point is: Yalta, an air mattress, a light evening breeze ... and he is in Turkey in three days! There is nothing good, like brainwashing (if any) by traveling in splendid isolation on the sea-okiyanu: in the struggle for life, all bad thoughts go somewhere ...
      2. +4
        3 October 2021 10: 31
        This is rather a flaw in our doctrine. We have Kamchatka, Chukotka and almost the entire coast of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, in fact, islands, as well as Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands
        1. +3
          3 October 2021 11: 12
          Exactly. Many believe that the means of amphibious assault are needed only for offensive operations. Although, in fact, the same landing craft / hovercraft will greatly help in the transfer of reinforcements to protect the remote areas of the Far East. Moreover, with the ability to land troops on an unprepared shore.
          1. +1
            3 October 2021 11: 35
            Quote: Comrade Y
            Although, in fact, the same landing craft / hovercraft will greatly help in the transfer of reinforcements to protect the remote regions of the Far East

            Although we also had landing operations on a huge scale (the same Crimea in the Second World War), it would seem, no matter how we understand this
  2. -2
    3 October 2021 13: 18
    All this American beauty is suitable only for landing on paradise beaches. I don’t know about the Far East, but in the European part of Russia it is Taman to Gelendzhik, Eastern Crimea, the coast of the Azov Sea, Kaliningrad Region, Leningrad Region, Rybachy Peninsula and Arkhangelsk Region. But there still need to walk, and organize the supply of landings, so that it does not work out as in Dunkirk and unas as with the landing on m Pikshuev.
  3. 0
    3 October 2021 17: 43
    During the second stage, a major overhaul is carried out with partial replacement and renovation of the hull structures. In addition, the boat again receives modern equipment.


    Probably, the engines turned out to be very successful, since neither the Americans nor the Japanese complained and did not try to change them radically. We only changed what is becoming obsolete due to the natural course of progress and wear and tear.