The birth of the Soviet missile defense system. Kartsev and Chelomey are building "Star Wars"

37
History Kartseva, like Yuditsky, is closely connected with the defense industry. All of his best works have been devoted to this topic, and as a result, his amazing talent and incredible genius were ineptly squandered by the party bureaucrats. In addition, Kartsev (like Lebedev) stood at the very origins of domestic computer engineering - he also found M-1 Brook!

With this we will begin our story.



Note that many of the machines mentioned here have already been described earlier, so we'll just refer the reader to the relevant articles.

The path to computer science for Kartsev began, as for a true veteran, back in 1951. The family, fortunately, did not reward him with relatives - enemies of the people, so he had no problems with the origin and training.

Kartsev was born in Kiev in 1923, his father was lucky to die a year after his birth and thus deftly avoid becoming a potential pest in the thirties. After the death of the breadwinner, the family moved to Odessa, then to Kharkov, then returned to Kiev, where Kartsev successfully finished school in 1941 and was immediately drafted to the front.

He fought desperately, as part of the Southwestern, Southern, North Caucasian and 2nd Ukrainian fronts, was a tanker, went through the entire war and was demobilized only in 1947. Took part in the liberation of Romania, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Austria. As a result of the war, the twenty-year-old foreman received the Order of the Red Star, medals "For Courage" and "For the capture of Budapest," so he showed himself worthy.

After the demobilization, Kartsev did not go along the party line, like our locksmiths-ministers, but moved to Moscow and entered the Moscow Power Engineering Institute at the radio engineering faculty, studied even too well - in the third year he passed exams as an external student and for the fourth, and as one of the best students In 1950, MEI was among the chosen ones, whom Brook took directly from the fifth year to the laboratory of electrical systems of the Energy Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences (ENIN) for the construction of the first / second (depending on how you count, see article about M-1) computer in the USSR - M-1.

M-2


Kartsev worked diligently and showed such abilities that in 1952, after graduation, he did not have to worry about work - the talented graduate immediately got a job at the ENIN of the USSR Academy of Sciences for a permanent job, designing the M-2 machine. For her, he had already become the main developer, the productivity of the car was about 2 KIPS - at that time a decent figure, as we remember, the monstrous "Arrow" had the same. Compare, however, the parameters.

The birth of the Soviet missile defense system. Kartsev and Chelomey are building "Star Wars"

Still assembled almost from scrap metal (ENIN employees were actively dismantling German trophies for spare parts, as we already mentioned), the miniature and easy-to-use M-2 made the NIEM development monster in all respects. Knowing the USSR, it's easy to guess what went into the series. As we remember, Strela was the worst of the three designs of machines from 1952-1954 - the BESM was 1,5 times smaller and three times faster, and the M-2 was 6 times smaller and simpler at the same speed. In fact, the tradition of looking not at the characteristics, but at the proximity to the party was built into the domestic computer industry right at the time of its creation.

The most interesting thing is that the M-2 did not even have a chance to get into the series. The car was made in a completely blasphemous way for the USSR - it was not in the State Planning Committee and TZ was not lowered onto it. It was not ordered or approved by officials, in fact, Brook, as in the case of the M-1, was engaged in the development of a computer almost clandestinely.

As a result, absolutely everything that needed to be made and assembled was made handicraft, on the knee and in parts. M-2 was several times larger than M-1, it was impossible to build it by the laboratory. Naturally, no plant could take up its production without a party decree, as a result, it was necessary to carry out production in parts, negotiating here and there throughout Moscow through Brook's personal contacts.

For example, the pedestal of the machine was made at the pilot plant of the Institute of Fossil Fuels of the USSR Academy of Sciences, RAM - at the plant of medical equipment, logic blocks were mounted in the experimental workshops of the Moscow Power Engineering Institute. The manufactured parts were sent to the laboratory for assembly and adjustment, and a new batch of documentation was sent to production, etc. Working in this way, after 19 months it was possible to assemble an arithmetic device and a control device, another month was spent on a power supply unit and a magnetic drum. Finally, by December 1953, the RAM cabinet was plugged in and the car started up.

Surprisingly, this story repeated itself, in general, in all the developments of Brook himself, his cars were created all the time in a pirate way, without government support. His only patron was the director of the ENIN of the USSR Academy of Sciences Academician Gleb Maximilianovich Krzhizhanovsky, the creator of GOELRO, an exemplary old Bolshevik and a friend of Lenin, who, by some incredible miracle, was not cleaned up by Stalin in the 1930s (despite his personal dislike for him). As Alexander Zalkind recalled,

work on the computer ... was carried out semi-legally, today they would say that this is the work manager's hobby and nothing more.

As we have already said, in the early 1950s, machine time in the USSR was so valuable that applications for the use of a computer were submitted through ministers, M-2 had an advantage in this regard. Finding itself in a kind of legal vacuum, not formally attached to anyone, it was used outside the standard hierarchy to solve problems personally approved by Brook.

Naturally, the use of such a thing, unique for the Union of those years, as a computer, could in any case generate politics around the machine. Brook set aside time for those tasks that seemed interesting to him (well, for those people who could contribute to his election to full academicians, as we remember, he was already a member of correspondent by that time). For the convenience of the visiting scientists, he even organized a group of programmers, gradually developing a library of useful subroutines.

Experts from the Institute of Atomic Energy, ITEP, FIAN USSR, Central Institute of Forecasts, State Astronomical Institute named after V.I. Sternberg, Moscow Aviation Institute, Institute of Oil, Gas and Chemistry. Gubkin, Faculty of Physics and Mechanics and Mathematics of Moscow State University and others. It should be noted that this machine really brought a lot of benefits - from calculating the supports of the Bratsk hydroelectric power station and wells in the Stavropol gas field to purely theoretical studies in the field of elementary particles.

Then, as we said, politics began. Brook was closely acquainted with the fathers of Russian cybernetics - Sobolev, Lyapunov, Kantorovich and Kitov. By cybernetics, we mean its classical meaning - the science of optimal methods of systems control. Kantorovich and Lyapunov were world-class mathematicians and were engaged in economic models, Sobolev, as the head of the Department of Computational Mathematics of the Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics of Moscow State University, supported them in every possible way, and Kitov came up with a brilliant idea at that time - to create an extensive computer network for the State Planning Commission, in fact the Soviet Internet, connecting a variety of control computers into a single system.

We will come back to this idea later, because it cost dearly to everyone who supported it, we note for now that Brook also became infected with the concept of a computer network and began to promote it (as it turned out later, in vain).

So, Brook would not have been himself if he had not tried to derive some personal benefit from the M-2, he hoped that in the next elections to the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Sobolev, seeing what benefit the machine brings him, would vote for him. For unknown reasons, Sobolev chose Lebedev - he suddenly ascended into the pantheon of Soviet scientific superheroes, and Brook was left with nothing. As a result, Brook took offense and later flatly refused to cooperate with Moscow State University, and stopped giving them his car.

This is how N.P. Brusentsov, the designer of the world's only serial ternary computer "Setun", recalls this:

Then the task was very simple: we had to get our own M-2 machine for Moscow State University, which was made in Brook's laboratory. But it turned out to be a problem. At the elections of academicians, Sergei Lvovich Sobolev, our leader, voted not for Brook, but for Lebedev. Brooke was offended and did not give the car. I came to Sobolev and asked: what am I going to do now? He answers me: let's make our own car.

In general, it is not entirely clear what Nikolai Petrovich had in mind, the M-2 existed in a single copy and no one was going to replicate it. Probably, Sobolev discussed with Brook the possibility of making another copy for Moscow State University, or moving the M-2 to the country's main university? In any case, the cooperation between ENIN and Moscow State University ended on this sad note, and Brusentsov began a project of a ternary computer, with which there were also monstrous political and bureaucratic torments, nevertheless, in 1958 "Setun" successfully started working.

The maximum benefit that Brook got from the M-2 was the reorganization of ENIN in 1956 into an independent Laboratory of Control Machines and Systems of the USSR Academy of Sciences (LUMS of the USSR Academy of Sciences) under his leadership.

Interestingly, Brook also conducted the country's first experiments with computer networks. In 1957, at the first industrial exhibition in the pavilion of the Academy of Sciences at VDNKh, the remote control of the M-2 computer was connected by a telephone line with a machine located on Leninsky Prospekt. The machine solved the tasks set from the remote control and issued printouts to the teletype, the whole exhibition gathered to look at such a miracle.

A little later, these experiments helped Kartsev in the development of the M-4 complex for remote work with radars. The machine itself worked for 15 years, of course, being hopelessly outdated, which once again shows the level of computerization of the Union - even old computers were worth their weight in gold. After that, alas, a typical fate awaited her - scrap metal.

It is surprising that long before Google, with its practice of allocating paid working hours to employees for the implementation of their personal ideas and projects, Brooke introduced a similar undertaking. Taking advantage of the fact that the M-2 machine was in fact his personal computer, he (at the time when academics literally fought during machine time) by a strong-willed decision allocated Sunday for the entertainment of programmers. As a result, the employees programmed game tasks, system diagnostics tasks, and others. From these entertainments, the first in the USSR original algorithms for enumeration, construction of reference systems with logarithmic notation and search, etc., grew up.

M-3


The M-3 machine, the successor of the first two, passed by Kartsev, it was developed by N. Ya.Matyukhin's group since 1954 (Matyukhin was a strong engineer, although not such a genius as Kartsev, he specialized in small computers, and the intelligent leader Brook, not wanting to squander his subordinates in vain, he gave him his own task, so Kartsev went to make M-4, and Matyukhin - M-3).


Above - most likely, the only surviving photos of the M-2 and M-3 vehicles from the INEUM archives (http://www.ineum.ru). Below is a mock-up of the M-3 machine in the museum of the Minsk Computing Machinery Production Association (photo https://museum.dataart.com).

Brooke was just an inveterate anarchist, so the work was done again without a special decree, again on an initiative basis! In fact, nothing would have happened the third time if three academicians were not interested in Series M at once - V.A. Ambartsumyan (Academy of Sciences of Armenia), A.G. Iosifyan (VNIIEM) and S.P.

As we remember, in the mid-1950s, the number of computers in the entire USSR numbered a dozen and not a single one of them (with the exception of the Ukrainian MESM) was in the Union republics, naturally, the prospect of getting at least one piece greatly inspired them. In 1956, three copies of the M-3 were made at the pilot production of VNIIEM, they were divided by the project participants: VNIIEM itself, Korolev and the Yerevan Mathematical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of Armenia.

Naturally, not a single plant undertook to make it in series, since it was not in the plans, but a lucky chance helped.

At the same time, the Belarusians were completing the construction of the Minsk Computer Engineering Plant, they offered to make the car at home, and the State Planning Committee suddenly gave the go-ahead (as we can see, in the days before the Ministry of Radio Industry and the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, issues of production were solved somehow easier).

Remembers B.M.Kagan, who informally led the joint development group:

... Since the work on the creation of the M-3 computer was proactive and was not included in any plans, the State Commission headed by Academician N. G. Bruevich with the participation of M. R. Shura-Bura showed character and did not want to accept the machine: they say , was born illegally. But they accepted it anyway. And for two years it was not possible to solve the issue in a state-like manner - to launch it into serial production. At this time, the Yerevan Institute of Mathematical Machines was organized, and according to our documentation on the M-3 computer, this institute built its first computers. In those same years, a plant was built in Minsk, but it turned out that he had nothing to do. Minsk residents learned that Iosifyan has a car, which no one agrees to put on the series. And only then it was decided to transfer the documentation for the M-3 from VNIIEM to this plant. So the work on the creation of the M-3 computer became the basis for the development of mathematical mechanical engineering in Yerevan and Minsk.

M-3 continued the command system of previous machines, was miniature (3 cabinets + power supply, total area of ​​about 3 sq. M, power consumption 10 kW, only 774 lamps and 3000 diodes) and had a slightly lower performance - about 1 KIPS (in the version with memory of a healthy person, on ferrites, in the version with a magnetic drum - no more than 0,03 KIPS).

In general, the desire for miniaturization (which resulted in extremely successful models of small computers) was born in Brook not from a good life.

As we remember from the M-1 (which had to be assembled on trophy cuproxes), ENIN had a huge strain with lamps, and getting even 200-300 pieces was just the highest aerobatics of Soviet blat and penetration (at the same time, a total of more 50 thousand, not greedy).

A.B. Zalkind, one of the participants in the creation of the M series, recalls that the quote characterizes that time so amazingly that it deserves to be quoted in its entirety:

Machine time on the first computers was extremely important for the department, where Boroda [Kurchatov] was at the head. The famous scientist S.L.Sobolev was the right hand of Boroda, responsible for mathematics. He often visited the M-1 computer, strongly supporting our work. For his team, it was required to carry out inversion of high-dimensional matrices ... At this time, we began to receive the first domestic 6X4 pentodes. An attempt to replace German pentodes with domestic ones failed, since the spread of the cutoff voltage of our pentodes was very large ... The operation of the M-1 computer, even during tests, stopped. This was very unpleasant for Sobolev. And for our development team, it was a disaster. I was sent to Leningrad to the Svetlana plant with the task of bringing a batch of several hundred 6X4 lamps that had passed special control.
For this, a simple stand was made with a mains plug and with one lamp panel, a power circuit for a pentode and a TT tester for measuring current.

We prepared a regular letter: “In order to provide technical assistance, please allow the representative to reject your 6X4 lamps. We guarantee payment ... "

Before our departure, S. L. Sobolev visited us. He told me: “If there are difficulties, you should call by phone ... At the beginning of the conversation, say a word (Sergei Lvovich gave the name of a flower known to all). After such preparation, with trepidation I stepped onto the carpet of the office of the chief engineer of the Svetlana plant Gavrilov. I was still stomping at the entrance when Gavrilov, without getting up from his chair, asked: "Pick up the lamps?" I replied, "Yes." In response I heard: "Get out of here! .."

Sadly I trudged off to the hotel, and then I remembered Sergei Lvovich's parting words. I called. After answering, the subscriber named the flower. A voice in the receiver said the number of an apartment in a residential building on Nevsky Prospekt, opposite the knitwear studio. Came to this address. Outwardly, an ordinary apartment. They let me in, listened carefully and said: “We act only at the level of the third secretary of the regional committee. You will have to wait two days and call us in the same way. " Two days later my call was answered: “Everything is all right with Gavrilov. You can visit him. " On the Svetlana, Gavrilov smiled, held out his hand and gave instructions to do everything I needed. I took three hundred 6X4 lamps to Moscow.

A story worthy of "Seventeen Moments of Spring" to gain a couple of hundred pentodes.

As a result, Brook learned to masterfully save on everything he could, and thus an extremely successful project of small cars was born. The M-3 series was produced in Minsk from 1958 to 1960 in a simplified version (with memory on a primitive magnetic drum), 16 machines were manufactured, and in 1960 they managed to make 10 more with ferrite memory. In the same year, the plant switched to "Minsk" - their own version of the M-3 (the developer was G.P. Lopato, a total of 10 versions of this architecture were created, and Lopato himself then wound around the Union and even abroad, helping to debug their machines M -series).

In Yerevan, the car served as the basis for "Aragats", "Hrazdan" and "Nairi". Most notably, in the mid-1950s, international and intra-union cooperation was surprisingly more effective than in the 1960s. Copies of the documentation on the M-3 were received not only by Armenians and Belarusians, but also by Academician V.A. and even the Chinese! However, the history of early Chinese military computers is beyond the scope of this story and, if there is interest from the readers, deserves a separate article, especially since there is no information about this in Russian at all.


Engineers debug the program on the "Minsk-1" computer in LITMO. Computer "Aragats" in the computing center of Perm State University. "Hrazdan-2" is the factory version of the M-3, modified by the Yerevan Research Institute of Mat. machines. Early 1960s (photo https://museum.dataart.com).

M-4


And what was Kartsev doing at this time?

Of course, he built the M-4! The director of the Radio Engineering Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Academician A.L. Mints, already known to us on the topic of missile defense, in 1957 turned to Brook with a proposal to develop a computer for radar, designed to work in conjunction with the radar of Yu.V. Polyak. Brook, of course, agreed, and in the best traditions of the Soviet classics, he became the general designer, and, of course, Kartsev became the developer.

The machine was already semiconductor and architecturally adapted for specific signal processing algorithms, for example, the processor supported hardware square root extraction, double comparisons, etc. Kartsev in M-4 was the first to propose solutions that later became classical - firmware with algorithms, channel I / O coprocessors and other architectural features of 1960-1970 air defense / missile defense computers.

For the M-4 computer, two versions of the ALU were designed: the U-1 parallel type on static triggers using a pulse-potential system of elements (P-16B transistors) and the U-2 series U-2 type using a purely pulse system on dynamic triggers with diffusion transistors P403 and delay lines. Both were made, but a parallel one went into series.

Kartsev, in addition to the general architecture, was personally responsible for the development of the control device. The machine turned out, again, rather compact, all the equipment was placed in 4 cabinets and 2 racks. A year later, the work was completed, and the documentation arrived at the Zagorsk Electromechanical Plant (ZEMZ), by 1960, two prototypes were manufactured and installed at the Radio Engineering Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences for tuning and docking with the radar. For the convenience of work, the team headed by Kartsev was assigned to the Special Laboratory No. 2. These people later entered the Kartsev Research Institute.

At this time in Kazakhstan, at the Balkhash test site, the first tests of the prototype of System "A" - the Kisunko anti-missile defense system were already in full swing. For control and interfacing, an ersatz was used, quickly converted by Burtsev from BESM-2 - the M-40 machine, manufactured by ITMiVT.

In general, Burtsev, as we have already said, was incredibly lucky - without expecting it, Lebedev's student managed, without participating in any battles, to automatically become the only developer of actually working missile defense computers in the USSR, mass-produced, taken on combat duty and working in such quality. As a result, 99 percent of people who are minimally involved in the topic of domestic missile defense development will confidently name Burtsev when asked who was the protagonist in the development of missile defense computers.

Judge for yourself - when in 1955 Kisunko was looking for a computer for his system, there were only Strela at hand (it makes no sense to even think about this), M-2 (similarly, the power is not nearly the same), Kartsev's machines are not yet in the project it was, BESM-2, the work of the master Lebedev himself, was also not suitable, fortunately, he found an intelligent student - Vsevolod Burtsev, who already had experience with computers for radars (project "Diana", 1953).

As a result, Kisunko was forced in 1959 to be content with his bundle of M-40 and M-50, and it was they who participated in the epoch-making successful experiment of intercepting a ballistic missile.

Further in 1961, he develops an improved version of the M-50 - 5E92b, which, again, is put on the prototype of the A-35 system in anticipation of Yuditsky's machine, which, as we already know, is canceled in 1971. And voila - Burtsev again, by the will of fate, becomes the author of the first missile defense computer in the USSR, put on alert. Further, the Kisunko project is closed along with all the work of Kartsev and Yuditsky, and the new A-135 missile defense system receives the Elbrus computer to work ... yes, Burtsev again.

Elbrus-2, moreover, functioned as part of the complex back in 1995, which as a result led to a persistent myth: ITMiVT is the only greatest developer of world-class supercomputers in the USSR from the moment of its foundation until the collapse of the Union, Lebedev (in the most old-school version of the myth) / Burtsev (in the version close to reality) are the greatest fathers of Soviet supercomputer technologies, so cool that their machines defended our skies from enemy missiles for 50 years. However, we still have a long and interesting conversation about ITMiVT and their machines.

Now let's return to Kartsev again.

The most interesting thing is, what was the M-4 system intended for?

The reader might think that the Sary-Shagan training ground on Lake Balkhash in Kazakhstan in 1961-1962 means the "A" system and anti-missile defense. Nothing of the kind, as we remember - Mints ordered the car to Kartsev, who did not want to have anything to do with the anti-missile heresy. The test site was used for a bunch of various tests, and in the early 1960s, research was carried out there on Chelomey's absolutely schizo-technical project - the "Satellite Fighter" system.

As a result, the life and work of Kartsev turned out to be, to the very end, connected in one way or another with this project.

In general, Chelomey was an epochal and great person, he definitely deserves a separate article, which, and not just one, has already been written about him. Therefore, here we will only touch on the project itself, for which the M-4 was created and its background.

As you know, Chelomey's whole life was spent in a continuous confrontation with Sergei Korolev. Korolev's talent as a designer can be discussed for a long time, but as a manager and even a top manager, as they would say now, he was absolutely brilliant (and he was excellent at working with the Soviet bureaucracy, being able to lubricate a critically important gear at any moment). Chelomei was indeed a brilliant scientist, mechanic and mathematician, but at the same time transverse, almost like Kisunko, and the party battles were given to him with difficulty.

What was more important in the conditions of the USSR can be judged by 1945.

By this time, Chelomey, being a simple student, was giving a course of lectures on the dynamics of structures to the engineers of the Zaporozhye Motor-Building Plant, a year before the flow he graduated with honors from Kiev aviation Institute, in parallel at the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, attended a course of lectures on mechanics and mathematics by the great Italian scientist Tullio Levi-Civita, the father of the mathematical part of general relativity, who worked with Einstein, communicated and studied with such outstanding mathematicians and mechanics as academician Grave and famous Krylov. At the age of 22 he wrote his first university textbook (published!) On vector analysis, by the age of 25 he published 14 articles and became a candidate of sciences, having defended himself at the Institute of Mathematics of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, in 1940, among the 50 best young scientists of the Union, he was admitted to a special doctoral program at Academy of Sciences of the USSR (26-year-old Chelomey is the youngest in this fifty elite).

At the age of 26, he becomes a doctor of sciences and receives a Stalin scholarship in the amount of 1500 rubles, a huge amount for those times, more than the salary of a professor. In 1942, the Central Institute of Aviation Motors. P. Baranova Chelomey invents and builds the world's first pulsating jet engine, and by 1945 his cruise missile 10X, the first in the USSR and the second in the world, was adopted.

By this time, Sergei Korolev graduated from a technical school in Moscow, builds gliders and flies on them, in 1933 somehow manages to get into the Jet Research Institute of the NK of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs and by 1935 become the head of the rocket aircraft department. And then his career was tragically interrupted - the leadership of the Jet Institute fell under the purge, including himself. In the famous sharashka, TsKB-29 helps another inmate, Tupolev, to design the Pe-2 and Tu-2, in the second sharashka, OKB-16 attaches a jet accelerator to the Pe-2, and was released ahead of schedule in 1944. And then the career flooded.

As a result, by 1950, Korolev became the chief and chief designer of the OKB-1 NII-88 MV USSR, created for him, and Chelomey was summoned to the carpet to Stalin on a denunciation of the futility of all his work. Chelomey is kicked out from everywhere, his design bureau is taken away, his plant is transferred to A.I. In February 1953, he personally went to Stalin.

According to Chelomey,

everything was at stake. The tension is extreme. But I had one advantage: I was young.

As a result, a miracle happened, and from the leader's office Chelomey went not to the Gulag, but back home, somehow convincing Stalin that he was not a pest. A month later, Stalin dies, and Chelomey, still in shock from what happened, meets Khrushchev.

Having experienced such a turning point, people usually learn valuable life lessons, and Chelomey also learned. He forever realized that more important than all real developments are the real patrons in the party. In February 1958, a graduate of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University Sergei Nikitich Khrushchev was assigned to one of the most promising organizations of the military-industrial complex - OKB-30 to our friend Kisunko. However, at that moment he was on the rise, had a whole bunch of applications and, even without looking at the list, announced the search and refused to hire another group of graduates.

His deputy Elizarenkov noticed the name of Khrushchev, but, knowing the character of the chief, did not object. So the priceless list landed on the table of the chief designer of the then little-known OKB-52 of the State Committee for Aviation Engineering of Chelomey, and he instantly realized that such a treasure should not be missed. The son of the secretary general was immediately adopted, and in the same year Chelomey was elected a corresponding member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, in 1959 he was appointed general designer of aviation equipment of the USSR, without delay and hesitation, his first missile system P-5 was adopted by submarines. Immediately after the death of the aircraft designer Polikarpov, Chelomey occupied his well-equipped experimental plant on Khodynka.

As we already remember, he is trying to declare his missile defense project, a bit manic and providing for massive thermonuclear air explosions of anti-missiles in the North Pole, from where the main wave of attacking ICBMs was supposed to go, but, realizing the absurdity of the idea, he rejects it. His eternal rival Korolev at this time launches the first satellite, and Chelomey is struck by an interesting idea - in opposition to his opponent, to submit the idea of ​​an anti-satellite weapons... Well, at the same time, it was necessary to load its design bureau with a government order - the niches of the air and missile defense were occupied by Raspletin and Kisunko, the anti-satellite topic remained free. Moreover, on February 28, 1959, the United States launched the first military-experimental reconnaissance satellite, Discoverer 1, into orbit. Khrushchev immediately declared that no foreign reconnaissance satellites dare to desecrate the space of the USSR, someone threw in the crazy idea that there could be a nuclear bomb on board the satellite , in the end, it is easy to guess that Chelomey received carte blanche for any of his experiments.

Then a typical corps de ballet began, similar to the one with anti-missile defense, only with anti-satellite. The satellite had to be shot down with a satellite, it was necessary to launch the aforementioned anti-satellite into orbit with a heavy rocket (for the combat satellite of those years, according to the project, had a mass of under two tons), which means it was necessary to build a heavy rocket. Here KB Korolev and Yangel have already boiled - Chelomey climbed into their domain.

Yangel even had an R-16 rocket ready with a launch weight of about 140 tons (about as much as needed). Hearing about the project, Mikoyan pulled himself up, and even Kisunko offered his help, but Khrushchev rejected them all in favor of OKB-52. At the same time, in order to overwhelm the Queen, it took additional efforts of Marshal Ustinov himself, who could tolerate him and promoted him as a competitor to Yangel. Note that the marshal did not forgive him for the victories of Chelomey and until the end of his career he put a spoke in the wheels, especially after the death of Khrushchev.

When Khrushchev was flooded in 1964, Chelomey almost fell under the skating rink of repression for the second time, fortunately, the times were already herbivorous, so everything was limited to the typical undercover struggle "who will have time to cover whose projects before." As a result, this resulted in the fact that the commission headed by Keldysh and with the support of Ustinov hacked to death the Chelomeev Proton project in favor of the insane design of Korolev, the technoschizophrenic H-1 rocket, all 4 launches of which ended in phenomenal failure, including the most powerful explosion in the history of astronautics in five (!) kilotons, which completely destroyed not only the rocket and the launch pad, but everything within a radius of half a kilometer from the launch point (surprisingly, history later restored justice - "Proton" became one of the best missiles in the world, the pride of the USSR and Russia, used a lot years and performed an uncountable number of flights).

In 1979, Ustinov gave Chelomey, he was restricted in his activities, the manned flight programs developed by him were closed, the already completely finished and debugged first automatic station "ALMAZ-T" for all-weather sensing and radar of the Earth was removed from launch.

In 1981 Ustinov will say about Chelomei:

He became very independent.

After that, a decree of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the USSR Council of Ministers is issued, which actually prohibits all the work of Chelomeev's NPO Mashinostroenie related to space exploration. Three years later, Chelomey dies, he is forgotten for many years, the only legendary creator of the Soviet space program in all textbooks is Sergei Korolev, ranked among the pantheon of official geniuses of the USSR. And only in the early 2000s, this version begins to gradually burst at the seams.

Returning to the M-4 project, we note that, naturally, the PSO complex also required the entire ground harness - command-measuring complexes and radars. Chelomei did not quarrel with Raspletin and Mintz, unlike Kisunko, and therefore received their full support in one and the other. Naturally, this was only the beginning. The memoirs of the scientific director of the Central Research Institute "Kometa", academician A. I. Savin will help to feel the atmosphere of those years and those meetings.

By the beginning of my work in KB-1, the main responsibilities were distributed as follows. S. L. Beria, A. A. Kolosov and D. L. Tomashevich led the systems "Comet" and ShB-32, PN Kuksenko and A. A. Raspletin - the system "Berkut". Soon I was appointed deputy chief designer of S. L. Beria for the enterprise. After the resignation of S. L. Beria and P. N. Kuksenko, Deputy Chief Designer for Science A. A. Raspletin was appointed chief designer for anti-aircraft missile topics, and I was his deputy ...

Quite difficult times soon came for our design team.

On the one hand, after NS Khrushchev's statement about the futility of strategic aviation, work began to curtail on aircraft systems of jet weapons - our main topic.

On the other hand, the head of state's excessive enthusiasm for rocketry led to the rapid growth of missile design bureaus. Kisunko was engaged in an experimental missile defense system, and an influx of personnel from Raspletin and Kolosov began to him. Seeing the growing authority of Grigory Vasilyevich literally by leaps and bounds, specialists went to work for him. He accepted them willingly, especially since the staffing of his SKB-30 was constantly increasing. Alexander Andreevich was engaged in the modernization of the air defense system of Moscow, and the country's leadership treated his activities favorably.

We found ourselves under the threat of closure. It was necessary to save the team. While developing aviation, anti-aircraft and anti-tank systems, I drew attention to a completely new and, as it seemed to me, space theme very close to us. Our weapons were designed to combat moving targets - aircraft carriers, airplanes, tanks... Defeating a maneuvering target is a difficult task, so we focused on the creation of missile control and guidance systems. A unique team of high-class specialists was gradually formed. There were no such specialists among the developers of ballistic missiles, since ballistic missiles are designed to deal with stationary targets.

Reflecting on the prospects of our design bureau, I realized: either we will switch to the space theme, or we will cease to exist as a collective. Having called VN Chelomey, I asked to receive me. Vladimir Nikolaevich immediately set the time, and soon we met at his design bureau. I prepared thoroughly for the meeting, drew diagrams with which I illustrated my story. Chelomey listened attentively, but did not give a final answer. The meeting ended. I was waiting.

Rumors began to be heard that several leading designers had approached Chelomey with space ideas. Will my proposals be accepted?

Finally, I was informed that V.N. Chelomey had appointed a meeting. When I arrived, Raspletin, Kisunko and Kalmykov were already sitting in his office. Chelomey began the meeting, not paying any attention to me. Listening to him, I felt that the soil was leaving from under my feet. At the end of his speech, he announced that the anti-satellite system was entrusted to Kisunko, and the naval space reconnaissance to Raspletin. I got up and started to defend myself. I don't remember what exactly I was talking about then. I was very worried. Having finished, he sat down and prepared for the verdict.

I can't say how I took Chelomey, but his final speech had the effect of a bomb. Changing his decision to the opposite, he said that he was entrusting our SKB-41 with both space reconnaissance and anti-satellite defense.

No one objected to him. Kolosov left his post, and I was appointed acting chief designer of SKB-41. In the fall of 1960, we started developing a preliminary design for the Satellite Fighter system. We were entrusted with the ground complex, the onboard complex, part of the satellite's automation and the control program.

By the way, Kisunko also did not forgive Chelomey for this decision and later (in parallel fighting off his persecution by the Ministry of Radio Industry) took part in the persecution of Chelomey, perpetrated by Kisunko's patron Marshal Ustinov. Scorpions in a bank can serve as a good model of the life path of many Soviet general designers, regardless of their genius. Unfortunately, the reality of their existence was such that practically no one managed to get dirty in one way or another. And, looking at those times and those actions, now only the immortal lines of Nikolai Gogol from Dead Souls come to mind:

All Christ sellers. There is only one decent person there: the prosecutor; and that, if you tell the truth, a pig.


Above - the irreconcilable opponents, Chelomey and Korolev, were even outwardly a bit alike, usually smiling Chelomey could also be serious and tough, and the gloomy and strict Korolev could be charming and smiling. Below are children with a difficult fate, Sergei Khrushchev and Sergo Beria. Both worked with rockets, both were designers, both, after the fall of their fathers, were accused of taking their place solely thanks to the patronage of their parents and without it they would be nothing (photo http://www.npomash.ru, http: // deduhova .ru, https://comp-pro.ru, https://ru.wikipedia.org/)

Since in the development of the IS system, the main and most difficult were two tasks, completely analogous to the problems of missile defense: to select an enemy satellite and point its own anti-satellite at it with high accuracy, then no less powerful computers were required to solve this problem.

So Kartsev received his order, and an M-4 appeared at the Sary-Shagan training ground with a good performance of about 50 KIPS.

During the implementation of the machine, valuable experience was gained, and literally in the process of implementation, it was decided to build an improved version of the machine - M-4M, by adding specific nodes for the primary processing of radar data to it: a sector switch, a code converter, a drive, a threshold device, a buffer memory, transcoding devices, coordinate determination device, buffer registers, etc. The set was named the primary processing device (UPD) and was supposed to occupy one more typical cabinet from M-4. In the process, I had to try pretty hard, get new high-frequency diffusion transistors, but in the end, the modernization turned out as planned.

The UPO cabinet was ready by October 1962 and by 1963 the M-4M (some sources use the M4-2M index originally proposed by Kartsev) was installed at the Balkhash test site. Both machines were in operation at the facility until 1966.

Everywhere they write that the M-4M was produced in series, in practice it turned out a little differently.

Precisely, 8 copies of the kit were made (according to the number of Dnestr radars, 2 stations of 4 units, one near Irkutsk, Mishelevka, OS-1 node and at Cape Gulshat of Lake Balkhash in the Kazakh SSR, Sary-Shagan, OS-2 node). The kits were in operation for only 4 years until 1966, when the Dniester system became obsolete and was replaced by Dniester-M, and later - Dnipro.


The only canonical photo M-4M, a complete set of cabinets, 4 - for the main machine, 5th - UPO cabinet, 6th - interface equipment. Drawing of the project of the radar "Dniester" (photo http://www.icfcst.kiev.ua/, https://ru.wikipedia.org/)

One more important fact should be noted.

Acquaintance with the radar operators later turned out to be very bad for Kartsev. The fact is that the development of radar equipment was raked up by the same great and terrible Ministry of Radio Industry, formed in 1965, and Kartsev with his research institute, since he had already worked on the relevant topics, was automatically assigned to the subordination of Kalmykov. Knowing all the parts of the previous history, it is easy to guess that such submission could not end with anything good for the unfortunate Kartsev, it never ended.

Hack and predictor Aviator


Summing up the turbulent fifties, we can say the following, of course, on the basis of discussion.

The very idea of ​​a Satellite Destroyer from the point of view of the concept was much more insane and useless than missile defense. As already mentioned, it was precisely the fact that the Soviet anti-missile missile was the first in the world to be able to stop an ICBM attack that very qualitatively cooled many hotheads of the Pentagon, who were struggling with their desire to poke red buttons throughout the second half of the 1950s.

The importance of the air defense system is even more stupid to deny, so the investment of manpower and resources in their development was fully justified.

As for the PSO system, it is almost impossible to come up with an adequate case for its use.

The idea that a satellite could carry a nuclear bomb was absurd by the standards of 1950s technology - many times more reliable, cheaper and safer for themselves to use conventional rockets. Shooting down other people's satellites (even potential spies) in peacetime is difficult to imagine a greater absurdity, both from the point of view of the international situation and simple logic - exactly the same our own satellites fly over the territory of foreign countries in the same way.

In the event that the conflict reaches a stage of such a level that it will be necessary to destroy everything on which it is written Made in USA, then satellites will certainly not become a primary target, because at the same time a hail of nuclear missiles will fall on us. As a result, the usefulness of the satellite extermination system (as well as the general control system of outer space for the passage of these satellites) is an extremely controversial thing.

It is all the more annoying that the ingenious works of Kartsev were used only exclusively for this project, which absorbed an unimaginable amount of money.

In the next part, we will conclude our conversation about the M-series cars and find out how this epic ended.

To be continued ...
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    10 September 2021 19: 09
    Milestones in history. This is how the air shield of our country was born.
  2. +8
    10 September 2021 19: 25
    Cool continuation of the series !!! good
    The more I read, the more I am convinced that I do not know anything about the formation of a computer. wassat what
    1. +5
      10 September 2021 19: 30
      Quote: Corona without virus
      The more I read, the more I am convinced that I do not know anything about the formation of a computer.

      And you are not the only one.
    2. +2
      10 September 2021 20: 42
      The same story! Thanks to the author hi
    3. -2
      15 September 2021 13: 46
      Well no ...

      We have a banal continuation by the author of the aforementioned "cycle", collecting gossip from all available Network resources. And nothing more ...

      Moreover, in an obvious "park", and attempts to cover up his previous conceptual failure (talking about the mythical "destruction" of the evil Soviet nomenclature of the "domestic missile defense", the author, out of amateurism, missed the topic of the missile defense system, inextricably linked with the topic of missile defense. , the forum was reminded, hastily rushed to "catch up", presenting his puncture as a "planned" continuation of the topic ...).

      And he began to do this without any elementary, critical approach to the materials that he "dumps" on the portal ...

      Do you need "examples"? .. And here they are, thanks to the author, this is his opus ...

      "Hearing about the project, Mikoyan pulled himself up, and even Kisunko offered his help, but Khrushchev rejected them all in favor of OKB-52. At the same time, to overwhelm the Queen, it took additional efforts of MARSHAL Ustinov, who could tolerate him and promoted him as a competitor. Yangel. ... "

      The author, Dmitry Fedorovich Ustinov, became Marshal and Minister of Defense of the USSR in 1976. The aforementioned Khrushchev, by that time ALREADY MORE THAN TEN YEARS, had been "out of work" ...

      The Soviet space technology designer and rocket engineer Sergei Korolev died in 1966. Also FOR TEN YEARS, BEFORE "Marshal Ustinov", allegedly, "was involved in order to" promote "Yangel ...

      For this, which can not be spanked only in the "fascinating paroxysms" of chronic anti-Sovietism. Fortunately, there is someone to take an example from. Also a fugitive Rezun, say ...

      The main thing is that the audience, which is "not in the subject", was "interested" ...
      1. 0
        15 September 2021 19: 55
        Well, actually, that Ustinov promoted Yangel and drowned the Queen: I know that for a very long time !!! And without the cycle of these articles. wassat
        And the series of articles is very informative, I thought that I knew everything myself - it turns out nothing)))))
        1. +1
          16 September 2021 15: 08
          But I myself, never thought that I "know everything" ...

          My commentary is not about something that you "have known for a long time", but about something that is elementary, which the author does not know. Exactly DOES NOT KNOW, and not "sealed" or "confused".

          For, in the context of the development of the Soviet state, its political system, science and technology, the time of D.F. half of the 70s), these are already DIFFERENT EPOCHS.

          It's just on "autopilot", those who, in the first half of the 60s, at least started going to school and watching TV, should remember. Not that something is there, specifically, "from history" to study ...

          The author enthusiastically collecting memoir (and therefore subjective) opinions of individual participants and online gossip, "loads" them on the foundation of his anti-Soviet emotions and "presents" to the forum as a "historical sketch" on the development of Soviet electronics and computer technology. Passing it off as some signs of the "general inertia" of the Soviet system.

          Being a dilettante (albeit a passionate one) in both the first and second question ...

          In his passages in relation to Yu.V. Osokin (who developed his series of microcircuits according to the correct, in general, advanced for that time, technological concept (approach), but ABSOLUTELY IMPRESSIVE for the mass, serial, cost-effective production of highly reliable microcircuits material - germany) , which was allegedly "undeservedly forgotten", and an example for the commendably operational timeframe from the development of the first prototypes to the serial production of computing systems for the first stations of the Soviet PRN system (the existence of which the author, in general, did not know ...) I clearly showed.

          I can only remind you once again that the fugitive Rezun, who was read in the early 90s, the public, which allegedly "opened their eyes" to the "real" pre-war policy of the USSR, also wrote "very informative". And the author's approach to highlighting the topics raised is a banal tracing paper from the approach of the fugitive Rezun ...

          A "bunch" of deliberately, tendentiously selected textures imbued with the author's, subjective, anti-Soviet emotions. More, alas, is not visible ...
          1. 0
            16 September 2021 16: 36
            1. About Ustinov, to "close the question" tongue
            Ustinov "ruled missiles" (and those who developed them) since 1946, and promoted Yangel in every possible way - this is a historical fact, against him, as they say, "you can't trample" !!!

            2. About the "anti-Soviet" Author stop
            I did not see this in any of the articles of the cycle, on the contrary, as if he describes how programs and computers were developed during my youth, change names and places, and so 1: 1 good
            "There is no need to nod at the mirror, since the face is crooked" (c) Russian folk proverb
  3. +4
    10 September 2021 19: 29
    Thank you, the article is amazing, I learned a lot about something that was not written about at that time.
  4. +4
    10 September 2021 19: 38
    Throughout the series of articles, the power of the USSR appears as such a structure that absolutely inhibits or destroys scientific and technological progress. Of course, this is not always the case, or rather not for everything, probably. But, in general, based on the results - the destruction of the state - the negative role of the existing system of power seems undeniable.
  5. +3
    10 September 2021 19: 56
    Gorgeous of course a series of articles. I express my sincere gratitude to the author hi
    The people who know the thread, is there a separate publication where all the articles are collected?
    1. Fat
      +1
      11 September 2021 10: 34
      Quote: Mityai65
      The people who know the thread, is there a separate publication where all the articles are collected?

      hi I will join, a luxurious series of articles turns out, pulls already for a decent book Yes
  6. +2
    10 September 2021 21: 12
    AMET JAANMERETNI
    Quote: rocket757
    Milestones in history. This is how the air shield of our country was born

    In fact, the tradition to look not at the characteristics, but at the proximity to the party was built into the domestic computer industry right at the moment of its creation.

    Straight to the root of the system.
  7. +2
    10 September 2021 21: 53
    In some ways, all this reminds the libertarian thesis that, like in the Second World War, the Soviet people won in spite of Stalin and the party, which only poured everything out and harmed everything ..

    So here too - you read, it seems that even then some enemies of the people, stupid ghouls and absolute mediocrities were in power ... And only by the incredible efforts of single ingenious designers - the USSR somehow managed to keep up with its main rival - the USA ... Where, of course, everything was completely different, and their road to progress was shining and free from vile obscurantists.
  8. +1
    10 September 2021 22: 15
    Alexey Eremenko- Respect for a series of articles on the difficult beginning of Soviet computers. As a student of St. Petersburg PF LKI in the mid-70s, I myself came into contact with Nairi and ES1020.
    I found a lot of interesting things in these materials for myself
  9. +3
    11 September 2021 01: 52
    crazy design Korolev, technoschizophrenic rocket N-1, all 4 launches of which ended in phenomenal failure, including the most powerful explosion in the history of astronautics of five (!) kilotons

    five kilotons of what, if there is ~ 1 tons of fuel in N-2500? If we assume +500 tons of residue on the ground, then no more than 3 kTn of a kerosene-oxygen poorly mixed cocktail. And why is this "technoschizophrenic" rocket? The author, in my opinion, is generally better not to meddle in rocketry.
    1. +1
      11 September 2021 13: 41
      Quote: MBRBS
      five kilotons of what, if there is ~ 1 tons of fuel in N-2500?

      well, this is the conversion of joules to kT
      The author probably meant it
      The second start of the N-1 (copy 5L) took place on July 3, 1969. at 23 h 18 min 32 s Moscow time. A quarter of a second before the separation from the launch pad, a metal object (presumably - a steel diaphragm of the pressure pulsation sensor) got into the oxidizer pump, the liquid-propellant engine No. 8 of block "A" exploded. Interrupted the on-board cable network, damaged nearby engines and telemetry equipment. The lower part of the step began to collapse. After 0,5 s0,5 * after the command "lift contact", the KORD system began to turn off the liquid-propellant engines Nos. 7,8, 19, 20 and 21; at the ninth second - engine No. 9 (opposite to LPRE No. 18). After another couple of seconds, all engines were turned off, except for rocket engine No. XNUMX, which continued to work.
      Not having time, due to the destruction of the power cable network, to work out the command to turn on the course, the rocket, which was rising almost vertically, reached an altitude of about 200 m, then also began to fall vertically onto the launch pad. At the 15th second of the flight, the emergency rescue system of the descent vehicle of the unmanned vehicle 7K-L 1S, which was part of the head unit of the rocket, was activated. The only working rocket engine gradually turned the carrier around the axis, and after a 23-second "flight" the rocket fell almost flat on the start and exploded. It destroyed the launch facility No. 1, completely destroyed the rotating service tower, and seriously damaged the underground premises of the launch complex.

      -> The first stage of 30 NK-15 (11D51) engines with a thrust on the ground of 150 tf each
      fuel 1880-130 = 1750 tons / 120 seconds = 14,6 tons per second about 15 tons per second for 30 or 0,5 tons per liquid
      1750 -0,5 * 0,5 * 30- (30-4) * 0,5 * 0,5 * 9- (30-5) * 0,5 * 0,5 * 1- (30-29) * 0,5 * 0,5 * 9 = 1675 tone left after 29 out of 30 rocket engines were disconnected.
      1 worked for another 23 seconds.
      1675 tons-23 * 0,5 = let 1660 tons = 1660 000 kg
      -> the specific heat of combustion of kerosene is 43000 ± 1000 kJ / kg.
      total we get the heat of "explosion" = 73380 gJ = 17,538240917782 kilotons in TNT equivalent
      recourse if you have not screwed up in the calculations (giga per kilo, etc.)
      taking into account the fact that:
      - poured from the pipelines and the hull, while it flew and fell
      - combustion stoichiometry is not ideal
      -spilled on the ground and did not burn
      -just "flew off" somewhere to the side
      the conclusion
      Quote: author
      including the most powerful in the history of astronautics explosion in five (!) kilotons

      quite so - pulls on the truth
      "leaving a funnel with a diameter of 30 m and a depth of 15 m on the ground. The fragments of the 6L carrier scattered over an area of ​​several" square kilometers.

      Quote: MBRBS
      ... And why is this "technoschizophrenic" rocket?

      1.Archaic design with hanging tanks, return to V-1
      2.Theory (and practice): Stability of rocket stages
      to engine failures. To minimize the probability of a missile stage failure, the number of engines should be as small as possible (ideally, one).
      And we have -30!
      The SAZ of the N-1 is simply, in fact, at that level of development of technology and on-board computers, it is simply not able to solve the task
      3. Hot stage separation ...
      1. +2
        11 September 2021 17: 35
        your calculations are similar to the truth, Duc, the author stated about
        the most powerful in the history of astronautics, an explosion of five (!) kilotons

        and power, as you know, is energy per unit of time. Therefore, such an estimate in ktn for the total energy release, in the case of ideal combustion, through the TNT equivalent, misleads people. Because if even 1000 tons of TNT were detonated at the launch pad, the destruction would be much more terrible.
        One can argue about the design of the H-1:
        1. Suspended tanks are still in use, but then there was simply no equipment and technologies for the manufacture of load-bearing tanks of this size at the cosmodrome.
        2. "Stability of rocket stages to engine failures." - if we talk about the stability of the stages, then redundancy is preferable, for retraction of the rocket from the launch site in the event of a failure, or even putting the load into orbit (as in LV Energia). And this is 5+ engines.
        And it was still necessary to launch the fifth rocket on the more reliable NK-33, and then draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the SAZ.
        3. Hot separation of stages ... - well, you don't need to save the spent one.
        In general, I do not see any schizophrenicity in H-1. The rocket of its time, she just had no luck. (I didn’t slap the cons to you)))
        1. +2
          12 September 2021 11: 16
          Quote: MBRBS
          and power, as you know, is energy per unit of time. Therefore, such an estimate in ctn

          good
          and I didn’t pay attention. Well, it was impossible to write:
          the most energetic (most energetic) explosion in the history of astronautics, five (!) kilotons

          on the other hand6 the author needed this
          the most powerful explosion in the history of astronautics in five (!) kilotons per 1 secondsу

          E = integral (@P, x (0), x (1))
          1. And where are suspended ones used?
          "Suspended" nowadays is like a frame car, like tube tires ...
          2.there you are somewhat confused
          https://www.energia.ru/ktt/archive/2015/02-2015/02-02.pdf
          3. in the spent stage there is always: the remains of fuel components, and it does not contribute to the conclusion to the exact reference.
          Which is good for ballistic throw, does not roll for orbital launch.
          Korolev did not go for it out of a good life. He lacked specific impulse
          Quote: MBRBS
          (I didn’t slap the cons to you)))

          and I couldn't think of you.
          - such "minuses" are good, they show the level of the minus: they are accustomed to the back, and to knead the recumbent crowd with their feet. It is an indicator of a person's decency.
          -minuses are molded by Tiksi-3 and the same "organisms".
  10. 0
    11 September 2021 02: 30
    Good article. Thanks.
    I remembered school childhood, how Uncle Vova (the father of my classmate) gave us a lift from school, on the black Volga of Chelomey (he worked as his personal best man). Well, in general, I have a lot in my life connected with the plant. Khrunichev and KB Salyut.
  11. +3
    11 September 2021 12: 08
    After the demobilization, Kartsev did not go along the party line, like our locksmiths-ministers, but moved to Moscow and entered the Moscow Power Engineering Institute at the Faculty of Radio Engineering

    In order not to look unfounded, could you name the locksmiths-ministers (in the plural) with an indication of their education?
    1. 0
      17 December 2021 18: 49
      It was in earlier articles. Shokin is a locksmith, Kalmykov is an electrician, if I'm not mistaken, both graduated from technical schools, according to the author. The author wrote of both of them as leaders who had advanced along the party line.
  12. -6
    11 September 2021 15: 30
    The article was written by a man who angrily hates the USSR and everything Soviet ... the feeling of filth and distortion does not leave you while reading:
    [quote] [/ quote] his amazing talent and incredible genius were ineptly squandered by party bureaucrats [quote] [/ quote] ... and how many geniuses were raised by the Soviet regime. ... exactly like this
    [quote] [/ quote] The family, fortunately, did not award him with relatives - enemies of the people, so he had no problems with the origin and training.
    Kartsev was born in Kiev in 1923, his father was lucky to die a year after his birth and thus deftly avoid becoming a potential pest in the thirties later, and now at 30, none of them, and indeed of their many acquaintances, suffered ... because the people's power did not fight against the people ... this is a tale of liberals and other traitors
    [quote] [/ quote] As a result of the war, the twenty-year-old foreman got the Order of the Red Star, medals "For Courage" and "For the capture of Budapest" [quote] [/ quote] got ??? ... the author is that a complete bastard ... respected awards obtained by courage and blood ... and here it is dismissively acquired
    [quote] [/ quote] After the demobilization, Kartsev did not go along the party line, like our locksmiths-ministers [quote] [/ quote] ... another portion of empty malice ... and in fact, that's the whole text of the article is built ... well, that's an abomination ...
    There are good articles about Lebedev and how the liberal-minded elite in power (the Gvishiani thugs, opportunists and double-dealing Viktor Zorza ... B. Milner ... political scientist G. Arbatov and other agents of influence) simply destroyed the project of Soviet computers that could become the standard in the world and the pride of the country of Soviets ... and with the introduction of the State Planning Commission into the system, it is possible that the collapse of the USSR was prevented
    The article and the author intertwining information and anger is a fat minus
  13. +3
    12 September 2021 02: 45
    I'll try to insert my 5 kopecks. Since 1985 he worked as a system programmer with ES computers, as well as with PCs, which appeared a little later. I can say that working with the ES computer was sheer torment. Constant crashes, reboots several times a day. This applied to EU-1045, EU-1061, etc. At the same time, the ES-1022, although outdated and low-powered, worked well. All this was due to the poor quality of the microcircuits. But not only that. Since 1986, with the premiere of Ryzhkov, a new line ES-1036, ES-1046 has gone. As well as new operating systems (SVM). Tellingly, the stability of these computers was an order of magnitude better. As well as characteristics for speed, RAM capacity, occupied area, and so on. And then the first PK 1840, 1841, Iskra appeared. These worked reliably, but slowly, with little RAM, and either floppy disks or imported hard disks (none of which were available). That is, there is obviously a connection between the leaders of the USSR economy and the quality of computer technology. For me personally, those 6 years (since 1985) were very successful. He made good money on the implementation and maintenance of the deduction. processes. Moreover, both a system programmer and a simple programmer. Then there was a break for the terrible 90s, and then under Putin, life began again. I returned to my profession, which is what I'm glad about.
    1. 0
      15 September 2021 15: 01
      Quote: zimzinov
      And then the first PK 1840, 1841, Iskra appeared. These worked reliably

      Had little business since 1840 (or 1841? I don't remember anymore) at one time. There is no need to talk about reliability. And there is no maintainability at all. And I remember an article in one of the magazines of that time (seemingly "Electronics") devoted to just an analysis of the reasons for the unreliability of the EU 1840. From the details I remember only a couple of points:
      1. The machine was designed for production on certain equipment. By definition, the hardware compatibility of the boards with other PCs is out of the question.
      2. In the EU 1840, an imported IC was used with a foot pitch of 2,54 mm. But these ICs were installed in a Soviet "crib" with a step of 2,5 mm. The IC was long, incl. reliability problems were laid down from the beginning

      I had a chance to touch Iskra, but not much. It was also a kind of hardware machine, but it left an impression much better than the 1840, but it had a drawback: incomplete software compatibility with IBM PC XT, not all programs could be launched.

      But the Bulgarian "Pravets" against the background of EC1840 / 41 and "Iskra" looked much better, although the Bulgarians should not have dealt with computers within the framework of the CMEA.
    2. 0
      3 January 2022 18: 55
      There were no two identical copies at the same plant, so the reliability data differ.
  14. +2
    12 September 2021 11: 35
    The electronics engineer himself, though a communicator, has always been interested in the history of the development of electronics and, in particular, computers. I have never met more interesting articles and even more so a large series on this topic. Yes, even if I did not understand anything in electronics, but the history of personalities, under the carpet struggle, competition and other passions inherent in the era of the USSR and not only and in addition to the author's personal opinion on this matter, this is something new. Alexey thank you and naturally look forward to the continuation!
  15. -1
    12 September 2021 19: 09
    The most interesting thing is that the M-2 did not even have a chance to get into the series. The car was made in a completely blasphemous way for the USSR - it was not in the State Planning Committee and TZ was not lowered onto it. It was not ordered or approved by officials, in fact, Brook, as in the case of the M-1, was engaged in the development of a computer almost clandestinely.

    As a result, absolutely everything that needed to be made and assembled was made handicraft, on the knee and in parts. M-2 was several times larger than M-1, it was impossible to build it by the laboratory. Naturally, no plant could take up its production without a party decree, as a result, it was necessary to carry out production in parts, negotiating here and there throughout Moscow through Brook's personal contacts.

    For example, the pedestal of the machine was made at the pilot plant of the Institute of Fossil Fuels of the USSR Academy of Sciences, RAM - at the plant of medical equipment, logic blocks were mounted in the experimental workshops of the Moscow Power Engineering Institute.


    To put it bluntly, all the materials for the crafting were stolen from various factories. And there were hundreds of thousands of such cases ... This is how the USSR was destroyed ...
  16. 0
    13 September 2021 11: 01
    If the conflict reaches such a level that it will be necessary to destroy everything on which Made in USA is written, then satellites will certainly not become the primary target, because at the same time a hail of nuclear missiles will fall on us. As a result, the usefulness of the satellite extermination system (as well as the general control system of outer space for the passage of these satellites) is an extremely controversial thing.


    If there is a "cool mess", then something will have to be done with the satellites. The amerikosov have cool satellite constellations in all directions (communications, reconnaissance, navigation, etc.) and something will have to be done about it. Launching ISs is not an idea, there will be no time for this and no one will allow it to be done. Yes, and the satellites are now becoming small, but more and more in number.
    It seems to me (this is purely my opinion) that only nuclear explosions in space will be effective. True, EMP does not distinguish where its satellite is, where is the enemy, and who is not in business at all ... But this is an extreme case, when everything is at stake. In any case, our so-called. "partners" have more to lose than we do.
  17. +1
    15 September 2021 14: 42
    Mixed feeling from the material.
    On the one hand, it seems interesting, but ... how the author starts about party bureaucrats, it is not clear how it happened that in space the Americans were catching up with us, and not we.
    And the author got into the rocket topic clearly in vain. And Chelomey to oppose the Queen, I think there was no reason. You read and get the impression that "Chelomey is YES !!!, not like the Queen, but they pressed talent !!!". And Chelomeev's author remembered "Proton" how many years it has been flying. And as for the Soyuz, the Queen is silent, although he started flying early and will fly, unlike the Proton. And about the Chelomeev's tricks with cruise missiles - silence, it is just casually mentioned that Chelomey had some difficulties because of the vile slander of ill-wishers. Are they slanderous?
    In general, everything was lousy in the USSR: talents are squeezed, the best examples of technology are smuggled, etc.
    1. 0
      16 September 2021 18: 37
      On the other hand, it is very interesting to learn about relationships among the elites, the higher elites, for example, I did not know the lion's share of the material in this vein at all. There are moments of the highest sociology of the past, in the context of the corresponding system, of a kind.
  18. 0
    16 September 2021 18: 32
    > Invents and builds the world's first pulsating jet engine

    If we are talking about a ramjet, then it was still invented much earlier.

    > technoschizophrenic rocket N-1

    Not so schizophrenic than Saturn, what could not be debugged due to the closure of the project is another matter. Modernity has proven the viability of the coordinated operation of many first stage engines. With all due respect to Chelomey and Proton, of course.

    Thank you very much. We will wait for the Chinese moment in the computer in the future, very interesting!
  19. 0
    21 September 2021 12: 24
    Thanks! Very interesting. So far, the topic of highly specialized vehicles has been covered very little, as, indeed, the topic of missile defense. I look forward to continuing. If only someone wrote about the Urals ... At our school there was a Ural-2, non-working, by the way. What for? Who knows. In the boarding school of Moscow State University, it seems, was the same. And we programmed in machine codes BESM-2
  20. 0
    11 October 2021 17: 08
    At this time, we began to receive the first domestic 6X4 pentodes. An attempt to replace German pentodes with domestic ones failed, since the spread of the cutoff voltage of our pentodes was very large ...

    Here either someone is lying or is mistaken.
    A 6X4 lamp cannot be a pentode. according to the designation, this is a double diode. Moreover, it is a lamp, according to the designation "with an octal base, which in the mid-50s was already obsolete and was used mainly for high-power lamps. Besides, Svetlana has produced various pentodes since pre-war times.
  21. 0
    11 October 2021 17: 20
    In 1942, the Central Institute of Aviation Motors. P. Baranova Chelomey invents and builds the world's first pulsating jet engine

    And what then did the FAU-1 fly?
  22. 0
    29 October 2021 19: 38
    To say "Through hardships - to the stars" means simply to offend THEM! Poor soveyskaya power, was created "for", but existed "in spite of" ... All that it (the government) did - specifically killed the enthusiasm of the people, replacing it with a burp of the Unified State Exam and stupid (but grasping) managers.
  23. 0
    23 March 2022 02: 14
    "By this time, Sergei Korolev graduated from a technical school in Moscow, builds gliders and flies on them, in 1933 somehow manages to get into the Jet Research Institute of the NK VMD of the USSR and by 1935 become the head of the rocket aircraft department." From the text it is clear that Korolev is a birder who slipped above his strength, but this is a Moscow school ... named after Bauman! This is Baumanka, the author! Korolev graduated from the Bauman and defended his graduation project of the SK4 aircraft from Tupolev! The author also does not know about GIRD and how it turned into RNII. You can not continue here, but "" The son of the Secretary General was immediately accepted, and in the same year Chelomey was elected a corresponding member of the USSR Academy of Sciences, in 1959 he was appointed general designer of aviation technology of the USSR, without delay and hesitation, his first missile system P-5. Immediately after the death of the aircraft designer Polikarpov, Chelomey occupied his well-equipped experimental plant on Khodynka. Polikarpov died in 44, and then the young and daring Chalomey snatched off all his design bureau and base, but in 60, Myasishchev's coat was sewn to the button of the 52nd design bureau of the daring Chalomey - design bureau and base in Fili. Korolev became an eternal competitor so much after UR 200, when he got something missile and needed by the military. The author does not swim at all in the history of rocket science, he jumps like a drunken jerboa. If all his past articles on computers are just as accurate, then they are worth absolutely = nothing. Specifically, in this publication - anti-Sovietism vulgaris with bright epithets and tales interspersed with fantasies and inaccuracies. Yes., the Soviet system of the military-industrial complex and the development of high-tech industry had mistakes and very serious, powerful wars shuddered all the design bureaus and ministries of the military-industrial complex from the very foundation of the USSR. From rocket to tank. It was there too, behind the puddle. How many advanced technologies were discarded only because of momentary, political ones. bureaucratic and tactical decisions. that have affected the industry for decades. But if they fought for billions behind a puddle, then we fought for power in the apparatus, who will offer here and now a quick solution that will help catch up with the rich. a very rich and well-equipped opponent - gets all the goodies in the form of posts. orders and state dachas, but this is not a personal dacha. this is Mrs. property. But it was not the originality of the technical approach that was put at the forefront, but the survival of the country. The speed of acceptance into production is more important than the perfection of the design. Not to fat - to be alive. It must be understood that both in terms of the level of technology and the number of competent engineers, we have always been far behind the United States and its allies - that is, the rest of the technically scientifically developed world throughout the existence of the Union. But at the same time, neither in tanks, nor in the navy, nor in aviation did we manage to keep up far behind, and in places even noticeably surpass our "friends". How, if the whole system is against it? So they have the whole system against original and cheap solutions - it needs to be expensive, very expensive to have a percentage, and the longer it takes to develop, the better the story with Bradley and all sorts of Daina Sora. And do not forget that there is no extra money in the USSR; for example, Avtovaz was built on credit. We built one large automobile plant under an Italian loan, the state simply did not have its own free funds in the 60s. Oil rubles did not really have time to affect the development of new technology, to change the approach to development, the generation of qualified, or at least educated in their field leaders of the new generation did not have time to come - Perestroika came with beads and mirrors. The author's tendency to reduce everything to the tricks of the evil commies Morlocks is striking. against the Eloi engineers.